1 East Midlands Scrutiny Network Meeting 29 September 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

1 East Midlands Scrutiny Network Meeting 29 September 2017 East Midlands Scrutiny network meeting 29 September 2017 Attendees Bassetlaw District Council Joanne Wilson Bassetlaw District Council Cllr John Shephard Bassetlaw District Council Cllr Madelaine Richardson Blaby District Council Linda McBean Bolsover District Council Lynne Cheong Charnwood Borough Council Michael Hopkins Chesterfield Borough Council Rachel Appleyard Chesterfield Borough Council Cllr Peter Innes Chesterfield Borough Council Cllr Kate Sarvent Chesterfield Borough Council Charlotte Kearsey East Midlands Councils Kirsty Lowe Erewash Borough Council Lynne Ghent Erewash Borough Council Angela Taylor Erewash Borough Council Angelika Kaufhold Erewash Borough Council Cllr Richard Harris Gedling Borough Council Helen Lee Gedling Borough Council Cllr Meredith Lawrence Gedling Borough Council Cllr Marje Paling Kettering Borough Council Cllr Mick Scrimshaw Leicester City Council Kalvaran Sandhu Leicester City Council Cllr Elly Cutkelvin Lincolnshire County Council Nigel West Apologies Blaby District Council Cllr Louise Richardson Blaby District Council Cllr LEs Philimore Rutland County Council Natasha Brown Charnwood Borough Council Karen Widdison Welcome and introductions Cllr Meredith Lawrence welcomed network members to Long Eaton and thanked Erewash Borough Council for hosting the network meeting. He informed the network that this is his first meeting as chair of the East Midlands Scrutiny Network. A round of introductions followed. Minutes from the last The minutes of the last meeting were agreed. NHS England’s proposals for congenital heart disease services - Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland’s Scrutiny Committees approach Cllr Elly Cutkelvin, Leicester City Council provided an introduction to the Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland’s Scrutiny review of the Glenfield Heart Centre. Cllr Cutkelvin informed the network that she is the chair of the Leicestershire, Leicester and Rutland Joint Health Scrutiny Committee. 1 Cllr Cutkelvin provided context to the review, including the need to work with outside agencies and the additional powers of Health Scrutiny Commission to refer to Secretary of State. She informed the network that it has been an issue since 2013, and that they were coming to end of the formal consultation of the unit, with a lot of interest from the press, patients’ groups, MPs, Councillors and Unions. She informed the network that the purpose of the meeting was to listen to patients and their experience. At the end of the process letters were written to the Secretary of State and a formal submission to the consultation was made. Kalvaran Sandhu from Leicester City Council provided a detailed presentation on the joint scrutiny approach of Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland councillors. The presentation covered; Review of all 11-12 children’s heart units across the country, ongoing for 4-5 years Safe and sustainable review, referral to secretary of state, by Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland and Lincolnshire. Independent reconfiguration panel to look into the decision, to go back and look into the plans. Larger consultation period, joint meeting Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland The aim was to have a balanced view that would hear from other stakeholders Met in March 2017 and invited NHS England to come back Tried to hear as many views as possible and invited NHS England to be part so that they could hear from stakeholders too. Issues identified as part of the review With the closure of the Leicester Glenfield Heart Centre, patients would be referred to Birmingham or Leeds, which would mean that Lincolnshire is particularly affected Lack of transparency to decision making process Inequality of treatment for Leicestershire compared to other units Didn’t meet the recommendations from reconfiguration panel Performance of Units, greater weight given to surgery standards, Leicester isn’t the only service not current achieving this standard Personal conflicts of interest in the review Particular gap - decommissioning of services in Leicester would mean that the East Midlands would be the only regional not to have this service within their region Current position At present the final decision will be announced on 30 November The Hospital trust can refer for Judicial Review if decision to close Cllr Lawrence thanked Cllr Cutklevin and Kalvaran for the informative presentation, he invited questions from the network. A discussion followed on the requirement to form a joint committee of Leicester, Leicestershire and Rutland. Colleagues from Bassetlaw District Council provided details of their recent cross boarder issues with STP plans. Nigel West, Lincolnshire County Council informed the network that Lincolnshire did submit a response to the formal consultation. He sighted the geographical gap, lack of consultation, and the impact of the General Election had an impact on the time frame to respond. The network reflected on the importance of scrutiny and the effort that is put into the important reviews such as this. Cllr Lawrence reflected on the fact that Gedling Borough Council has never done any cross boundary reviews, but that it could be an opportunity to enhance scrutiny. 2 Promoting Scrutiny internally and externally Rachel Appleyard from Chesterfield Borough Council and Vice Chair of the East Midlands Scrutiny Network provided a presentation on promoting scrutiny and a recent project undertaken by Chesterfield Borough Council. Rachel provided context to the project undertaken at Chesterfield that involved presentations to all service managers, following changes in scrutiny and within the corporate management team. She informed the network that it was seen as an opportunity to explain scrutiny. The presentation covered; What is scrutiny, the legislative background Some of the managers had not experienced scrutiny before Focus on scrutiny as internal consultancy - Chesterfield BC tend to do pre-decision scrutiny Tried to create a friendly face of scrutiny, building on the idea of working together Cllr Peter Innes from Chesterfield BC provided details of how scrutiny is done at Chesterfield, including details of committees and the scrutiny processes. He provided details of the Scrutiny Project Groups, where anyone can be a member of these groups, Councillors and Officers. This group is currently looking at HS2 and the impact on Chesterfield. The presentation covered; Setting work programme - two working days, to engage cabinet, backbenchers and invited Heard from portfolio holders as to what they have coming up in their work programmes Development of a long list Consult on the work programme Promote working together and increasing engagement Varied work programme Role of Members Marketed that it is something that everyone can get involved with, opportunity to raise ward issues - Cabinet, Scrutiny and other elected members Role of officers and managers - need for evidence based and cooperation Unique selling point of scrutiny - internal consultancy Success stories, to be aware of what they had done - Fees and Charges Review was a success story that was explained to managers. Looked into the variety of approaches, engagement with the public. Corporate concessions policy - now a consistent approach and has increased income HS2, Town Centre and Development of the old QPSC A discussion followed on the Scrutiny project groups and how do they work constitutionally. Rachel informed the network that it is allowed in the constitution to have cabinet members on the Scrutiny Project groups. Rachel invited the network to break into small groups to discuss examples of work done to promote scrutiny, challenges faced and what has worked well; Experience of managers coming to meetings Challenges faced - political challenges, keeping it a-political Support for scrutiny, dedicated scrutiny officers Scrutiny commissioners and their role Talked further on Chesterfield approach 3 Promote scrutiny - large changes in councillors and officers, this was seen as an opportunity to promote scrutiny Discussions followed that covered; Challenge in changes in resources Being inventive in terms of reoccurring topics, ensure remain effective - use of criteria in selecting topics Discussed trying to get more interest in scrutiny Advance questions to cabinet More involvement from elected members Committees looking at HS2 across the region Preparing questions in advance Select committee members - planning in advance in terms of the approach Need to acknowledge that scrutiny is hard work. Scrutiny update from around the region Leicester City Council Health and STP - will be looking at it jointly Ofsted in Children Services with Leicester End of Life Care - Adult Social care Bus services act Political changes with Cllr Rory Palmer, who is leaving to become an MEP Bassetlaw District Council Management and Licensing HMOs Delivery of affordable housing Private rented sector - how can work Worked with CCG, extending access to closer general practice Work on health, STP. Challenges to do it because of being a lower tier authority Lincolnshire County Council Review of scrutiny last year, restructured Scrutiny panels set up - street lighting scrutiny Use of it to enhance work of front line Health - STPs - looking at EMAS and rural officers nature of Lincolnshire and need to improve response times Bolsover District Council Personnel changes within Scrutiny Income generation - fees and charges 3 scrutiny committees - dog fouling, litter - Transformation programme look at
Recommended publications
  • Ashfield District Council
    Dear sir/madam, 1 - Could you please confirm if you have carried out the compounding of any recycling banks belonging to 3rd parties promoting textile and or shoe recycling? 2 - if answer to (1) above is yes, could you confirm if you hold these containers in storage? Thank you for your Freedom of Information Request. The response from the department is as follows: These recycling banks are not normally on the adopted highway , and usually in supermarket car parks or on Borough or District Council Land. There used to be these ones, but they were taken out by the borough council years ago - https://goo.gl/maps/78cbiBF1Yei7v9mFA I would suggest that the District & Borough Councils may be able to provide you with further information, you can contact them at the following addresses: Ashfield District Council: [email protected] Bassetlaw District Council: [email protected] Broxtowe Borough Council: [email protected] Gedling Borough Council: [email protected] Mansfield District Council: [email protected] Newark & Sherwood District: [email protected] Rushcliffe Borough Council: [email protected] Nottingham City Council: [email protected] I hope this now satisfies your request, and should you have any further enquiries please do not hesitate to contact me directly on the details below. In addition to this and for future reference Nottingham County Council regularly publishes previous FOIR,s and answers on its website, under Disclosure logs. (see link) http://site.nottinghamshire.gov.uk/thecouncil/democracy/freedom-of-information/disclosure-log/ You can use the search facility using keywords.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 East Midlands Scrutiny Network Meeting 1 July 2016 Attendees
    East Midlands Scrutiny Network Meeting 1 July 2016 Attendees Bassetlaw District Council Cllr Madeline Richardson, Vanessa Cookson Blaby District Council Cllr David Jennings, Cllr Les Philimore Charnwood Borough Council/Leicestershire CC Cllr Richard Shepherd East Midlands Councils Kirsty Lowe Erewash Borough Council Angela Taylor, Angelika Kaufhold Gedling Borough Council Helen Lee, Cllr Meredith Lawrence Leicester City Council Jerry Connolly Lincolnshire County Council Nigel West Northamptonshire County Council Cllr Allen Walker, James Edmunds Nottingham City Council Cllr Glynn Jenkins, Rav Kalsi Apologies Blaby District Council Linda McBean Charnwood Borough Council Michael Hopkins Chesterfield Borough Council Cllr Tricia Gilby, Anita Cunningham Corby Borough Council Cllr Judy Caine Daventry District Council Cllr Colin Morgan East Northamptonshire Council Cllr Jake Vowles Leicester City Council Alex Sargeson City of Lincoln Council Cllr Jackie Kirk North East Derbyshire District Council Cllr Tracy Reader, Sarah Cottam Notes Welcome and introductions Cllr Walker welcomed network members and thanked Nottingham City Council for hosting the network meeting. Minutes from the Last meeting The minutes from the last network meeting were agreed. Impact of Gambling on Vulnerable Communities…. A Review Cllr Walker welcomed Jerry Connelly from Leicester City and thanked him for agreeing to present on the recent review of Gambling at Leicester City Council. The presentation covered; Context and structure of Scrutiny at Leicester City Council and
    [Show full text]
  • SCRUTINY NETWORK Friday 1 February 2019, 10:00 – 12:30
    SCRUTINY NETWORK Friday 1 February 2019, 10:00 – 12:30 Rutland County Council Attendees Blaby District Council Linda McBean Bolsover District Council Joanne Wilson Bolsover District Council Cllr Karl Reid Charnwood Borough Council Michael Hopkins Chesterfield Borough Council Amanda Clayton Chesterfield Borough Council Rachel Appleyard Chesterfield Borough Council Cllr Kate Sarvent East Midlands Councils Kirsty Lowe Erewash Borough Council Angelika Kaufhold Gedling Borough Council Cllr Marje Paling Lincolnshire County Council Nigel West Northampton Borough Council Cathrine Russell Northampton Borough Council Tracy Tiff Rutland County Council Natasha Taylor Rutland County Council Jo Morley University of Birmingham John Cade Apologies Bassetlaw District Council Richard Gadsby Bassetlaw District Council Cllr John Shepherd Blaby District Council Suraj Savant Chesterfield Borough Council Cllr Peter Innes Gedling Borough Council Helen Lee Hinckley and Bosworth Borough Council Rebecca Owen Kettering Borough Council Cllr Mick Scrimshaw Northampton Borough Council Cllr Graham Walker South Northamptonshire and Cherwell Emma Faulkner South Northamptonshire and Cherwell Lesley Farrell South Northamptonshire and Cherwell Natasha Clark Notes Welcome from Cllr Karl Reid, Chair of the East Midlands Scrutiny Network Cllr Karl Reid welcomed network members to Oakham and thanked Rutland County Council for hosting the network meeting. Minutes from the last meeting The minutes of the last meeting were agreed. CfPS Scrutiny Guidance Workshop John Cade from the Institute of Local Government Studies at the University of Birmingham provided an overview of the recent Centre for Public Scrutiny workshop on the Government guidance that is due to be published in the coming weeks. John provided an update on the guidance and the journey so far, from the initial Select Committee review into Local Government Overview and Scrutiny.
    [Show full text]
  • TO LET 47 GATEFORD ROAD, 41 Sq M (444 Sq
    TO LET Retail unit with residential accommodation 47 GATEFORD ROAD, WORKSOP, NOTTINGHAMSHIRE S80 1DZ 41 sq m (444 sq ft) • Well proportioned retail unit • Self-contained one bedroom flat PICTURE • Short-term lease available • Competitive rent NG Chartered Surveyors Holland House | 43 Loughborough Rd | West Bridgford | Nottingham | NG2 7LA 47 GATEFORD ROAD Worksop, Nottinghamshire S80 1DZ LOCATION TOWN & COUNTRY PLANNING The property is located on Gateford Road, on the edge of Interested parties are advised to make their own planning Worksop town centre. Worksop is the largest town in the enquiries of Bassetlaw District Council (Tel. 01909 535 149) in Bassetlaw District of Nottinghamshire and lies between respect of any proposed use prior to entering into negotiations. Nottingham and Doncaster. The surrounding area consists of a mix of local retailers and residential dwellings. BUSINESS RATES Charging Authority: Bassetlaw District Council DESCRIPTION Description: Betting shop & Premises The premises comprise a two-storey building of traditional brick Rateable Value: £3,550 construction under a pitched roof. Period: 2020/21 At ground floor level there is an open plan refurbished retail unit. TENURE The property also benefits from a self-contained one bedroom flat situated on the first floor. The property is available by way of an assignment or sub-letting. For further details please contact the marketing agents. ACCOMMODATION RENT The property has the following approximate net internal floor area, measured in accordance with the RICS Code of Measuring The property is available at a rental of £7,354 per annum Practice:- exclusive. Accommodation sq m sq ft VAT Ground Floor NIA 41 444 VAT is applicable at the prevailing rate.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016-2017.Pdf
    Executive Summary Veolia Environmental Services Nottinghamshire Ltd (Veolia) has been operating Nottinghamshire’s waste and recycling services for Nottinghamshire County Council (NCC) since 2005 through the 26 year PFI contract. This annual report covers the period April 2016 to March 2017, the eleventh year of the PFI project agreement. Veolia Nottinghamshire invoiced NCC £26.6m (excluding VAT) for waste management services during this review period. Contract year eleven was an exciting and challenging year during which Veolia finalised a proposal for a treatment solution for non-recyclable waste arisings in the administrative districts of Ashfield and Mansfield. Following extensive negotiations NCC accepted Veolia’s proposal for the construction of a modern refuse derived fuel (rdf) facility at Welshcroft Close, Kirkby in Ashfield. Planning permission for the facility was obtained in July 2016 and construction commenced during September 2016, the facility was built over the following seven months and was ready to receive commissioning waste during March 2017. A permit to operate was issued by the Environment Agency at the beginning of March 2017. The non-recyclable waste will be shredded, baled and wrapped at the facility and then exported for thermal treatment with energy recovery. During this review period the quality of the co-mingled dry recyclables delivered to the Contract MRF was subjected to a targeted project in Mansfield District. The project considered the best method to provide education and support to residents to reduce contamination in kerbside collections. In partnership with Mansfield District Council Veolia designed information leaflets, wheeled bin stickers and tags and used social media and focus groups to target a collection round that had high levels of contamination.
    [Show full text]
  • Nottinghamshire
    Rates Retention Scheme: Pooling Proposal 1. Pool title or description Nottinghamshire County Pool – all local authorities in Nottinghamshire (excluding Nottingham City Council, Nottinghamshire Fire Authority and Nottinghamshire Police Authority) 2. Lead Contact for pool; Paul Simpson Director of Finance & Procurement Nottinghamshire County Council County Hall West Bridgford, Nottingham, NG2 7QP 01159 773441 [email protected] 3. Local authorities included in pool: Nottinghamshire County Council, Ashfield District Council, Mansfield District Council, Gedling Borough Council, Bassetlaw District Council, Broxtowe Borough Council, Newark & Sherwood District Council and Rushcliffe Borough Council. 4. Counties and / or Local Enterprise Partnership(s) pool covers: The pooling area covers Nottinghamshire County, being the two-tier area comprising the County Council and the District Councils of Ashfield, Bassetlaw, Broxtowe, Gedling, Mansfield, Newark & Sherwood and Rushcliffe. At this time, the pool excludes Nottingham City Council and the Nottinghamshire Police and Fire authorities. The pooling area reflects longstanding relationships and service integration between the County and District levels and in part, relationships with the D2N2 Local Enterprise Partnership (LEP). 5. What is the aim / rationale for the pool? Please briefly describe: As referenced above, the pool builds on the already strong and well-established service relationships, with the overall aim of growing the local economy. Specifically, opportunities will be exploited to enhance the pool through links to wider funding sources such as the D2N2 LEP’s Growing Places Funding and potentially, European Funding where that exists. This will allow the partners to prioritise activity that increases the competitiveness of the area and stimulates private sector economic growth. It will also allow for the planning of economic growth across the functional economic area covered by the pool rather than being constricted by local authority administrative boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Everton Parish Draft Neighbourhood Development Plan V2 – Winter 2017
    Everton Parish Draft Neighbourhood Development Plan V2 – Winter 2017 1 Everton Parish Draft Neighbourhood Development Plan V2 – Winter 2017 Prepared by the Neighbourhood Plan Steering Group on behalf of the Parish Council With assistance from Supported by grant funding from 2 Everton Parish Draft Neighbourhood Development Plan V2 – Winter 2017 Table of Contents Section Page Stage 2 Regulation 14 Formal Consultation - How to Comment on this Document 4 Executive Summary 5 1.0 What is a Neighbourhood Development Plan (NDP)? 7 2.0 A NDP for Everton Parish 10 3.0 Key Planning Issues 12 4.0 Vision and Objectives 14 5.0 Protecting and Enhancing our Environment 17 6.0 Providing Housing 44 7.0 Supporting Business and the Local Economy 69 8.0 Protecting and Improving Recreational and Community Facilities 72 9.0 Improving Local Infrastructure 77 10.0 Next Steps 79 Appendices 80 Appendix I Extracts from Landscape Character Assessment – 81 Bassetlaw, Nottinghamshire 2009 Appendix II Listed Buildings 85 Appendix III Housing Developments in Everton Parish since the 1950s 89 Appendix IV Everton planning applications as at 03/10/2017 90 Appendix V List of Local Businesses in Everton Parish 92 Appendix VI Letter from Metcalfe Trust 94 Appendix VII CIL and Developer Contributions 96 Appendix VIII Summary of Characteristics of Character Zones 97 3 Everton Parish Draft Neighbourhood Development Plan V2 – Winter 2017 Stage 2 Regulation 14 Formal Consultation Friday 27th October to 5pm Friday 15th December 2017 How to Comment on this Document We would like to hear your views on the revised and updated draft planning policies and proposed site allocations set out in Draft Neighbourhood Development Plan (NDP) V2 for Everton Parish.
    [Show full text]
  • Nottinghamshire
    LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REVIEW OF NON-METROPOLITAN COUNTIES THE COUNTY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE SOUTH YORKSHIRE LINCOLNSHIRE Mansfield -\> / ?y: **mjf NOTTINGHAMSHIRE DERBYSHIRE LEICESTERSHIRE REPORT NO. 609 -LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND REPORT NO. 609 LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN MR G J ELLERTON CMC, MBE MEMBERS MR K F J ENNALS CB MR G R PRENTICE MRS H R V SARKANY MR C W SMITH PROFESSOR K YOUNG A THE RT HON MICHAEL HESELTINE MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT REVIEW OF NON-METROPOLITAN COUNTIES THE COUNTY OF NOTTINGHAMSHIRE AND ITS BOUNDARIES WITH DERBYSHIRE, HUMBERSIDE, LEICESTERSHIRE, LINCOLNSHIRE AND THE METROPOLITAN BOROUGH OF DONCASTER COMMISSION'S FINAL REPORT 1. On 2 September 1986 we wrote to Nottinghamshire County Council announcing our intention to undertake a review of the County under section 48(1) of the Local Government Act 1972. Copies of the letter were sent to the principal local authorities and constituent parishes in Nottinghamshire and in the surrounding counties of Derbyshire, Humberside, Leicestershire, Lincolnshire and South Yorkshire; to the National and County Associations of Local Councils; to Members of Parliament with constituency interests; and to the headquarters of the main political parties. In addition, copies were sent to those government departments, regional health authorities, water authorities, and electricity and gas boards which might have an interest; and to British Telecom, the English Tourist Board, the local government press, and local television and radio stations serving the area. 2. The County Councils were requested, in co-operation as necessary with other local authorities, to assist us in publicising the start of the review by inserting a notice for two successive weeks in local newspapers.
    [Show full text]
  • Young People Growing Stronger and More Resilient
    Young People Growing Stronger and More Resilient Voices, Views, Experiences and Ideas from 125 Young People (aged 6 - 12 years) who are Take Five Ambassadors and Leaders at seven schools in Worksop, Nottinghamshire Take five is bought to you by: Supported and funded by: Event partners: EACH AMAZING BREATH Not for profit Community Interest Company based in Nottinghamshire Let’s celebrate! On 29th June 2016, 125 young people aged 6-12 years, from seven North Nottinghamshire schools came together at the beautiful Rufford Abbey Country Park to celebrate being Take Five Ambassadors and Take Five Leaders. They were delighted to receive an Ambassador/Leader Certificate at the event from Councillor Yvonne Woodhead, Chair of the County Council, and Councillor Sue Shaw, Portfolio holder for Community Safety, Health and Wellbeing at Bassetlaw District Council. The event celebrated the work of the children and their schools, and showcased their collaboration and training with Each Amazing Breath CIC throughout the previous school year. The children had all completed a 6 session Take Five Ambassador or Leadership training programme. Each Amazing Breath CIC partnered with The Sherwood Forest Trust, Nottinghamshire County Council and Bassetlaw District Council to run the event. This picture shows all the guests, teachers and Take Five Ambassadors/Leaders as they arrive at beautiful Rufford Abbey Country Park, in the heart of the ancient Sherwood Forest. This picture shows all the guests, teachers and Take Five Ambassadors/Leaders as they arrive at beautiful Rufford Abbey Country Park, in the heart of the ancient Sherwood Forest. About the schools involved Each Amazing Breath CIC have been working with the schools Each of the schools has worked proactively with Each Amazing involved at the event for the last 12 months.
    [Show full text]
  • D2N2 Local Enterprise Partnership People and Skills Advisory Board
    D2N2 Local Enterprise Partnership People and Skills Advisory Board Date: Wednesday 22nd April 2020, 10:00-11.30 Venue: Zoom Meeting MINUTES OF MEETING Attendees Kath Mitchell (Chair) University of Derby Jane Howson (Deputy Chair) Autism East Midlands Andrew Marsh Derbyshire County Council Emma Moorcroft-Robinson Derbyshire County Council Harminder Matharu AELP Joe Battye Derbyshire County Council Julie Richards Chesterfield College Karen Manuel DWP Veronica Dennant Newark and Sherwood District Council Mike Firth Education and Skills Funding Agency Natalie Gasson D2N2 LEP Nicola Caley Murray Park School Nicola Lees South Derbyshire District Council Nicola McCoy-Brown Nottinghamshire County Council Nick Booth Uniper Nicki Jenkins Nottingham City Council Peter Brammall The Futures Group Rachel Quinn D2N2 LEP Richard Kirkland D2N2 LEP Sajeeda Rose D2N2 LEP Sarah O’Hara University of Nottingham Sonja Smith Nottinghamshire County Council Sue Fielding DWP Trudi Waldram Food and Drink Forum Will Morlidge D2N2 LEP Maureen Vieyra (note taker) D2N2 LEP Apologies Cate Edwynn PHE – Derby David Wright BEIS Gary Parsons Talk Staff Iain Peel Derby City Council Ian Bond Inspire Culture Julie Beresford Bassetlaw District Council Katrina Starkie Purpose Media This project is part-funded by the European Structural and Investment Funds Growth Programme 2014-2020 in England. Sensitivity: Internal Mandy Ramm Nottinghamshire County Council Nathan Clements Boots Pauline Anderson Derby City Council Sian Rebourg Laing O’Rourke 1. Welcome and introductions The Chair welcomed everyone to the meeting. SR advised the meeting how the D2N2 LEP was working. She also advised that the LEP was now starting to focus on recovery and what that might look like.
    [Show full text]
  • Project Commitments
    Project Commitments Priority Organisation Project ERDF (£) Public (£) Private (£) Total (£) P1 Nottingham Trent University Rural Knowledge and Enterprise Centre £356,869.74 £469,500.42 £0.00 £826,370.16 P1 De Montfort University Regional SME Design Support £390,025.00 £585,037.00 £0.00 £975,062.00 P1 Lincolnshire County Council Innovation Lincolnshire Phase 2 £986,666.00 £1,480,000.00 £0.00 £2,466,666.00 P1 University of Loughborough The Lachesis Fund 2 £1,991,633.60 £2,987,450.40 £0.00 £4,979,084.00 P1 Connect Midlands - University of Warwick Investment Readiness - Connect InvoRed £1,060,346.82 £976,708.07 £613,815.11 £2,650,870.00 P1 University of Lincoln Innovation for Productivity and Competitiveness £268,133.00 £402,200.00 £8,667.00 £679,000.00 P1 University of Northampton Modelling and Visualisation Centre £2,449,046.25 £4,107,174.95 £314,588.46 £6,870,809.66 P1 East Midlands Development Agency Grant for Research and Development £2,549,879.00 £3,824,821.00 £0.00 £6,374,700.00 P1 Arts Council England Creative Innovation Initiative £429,000.00 £643,500.00 £0.00 £1,072,500.00 P1 Pera Innovation Limited The Growth Readiness Investment Programme £641,960.00 £962,940.00 £0.00 £1,604,900.00 P1 De Montfort University ProspectIP £389,355.00 £597,500.00 £0.00 £986,855.00 P1 University of Nottingham Environmental Technology Centre - 4 £1,659,015.01 £2,488,522.99 £0.00 £4,147,538.00 P1 Nottingham Trent University Centre for Innovation & Technology Exploitation £236,389.00 £354,582.00 £0.00 £590,971.00 P1 East Midlands Incubation Network Enterprise Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Water Resources Management Plan
    Draft Water Resources Management Plan List of organisations consulted. The following list details all the organisations consulted following the publication of our Draft Water Resources Management Plan on 10 May 2013. Consultation with the listed organisations included one or more of the following: 1. Formal written notification of consultation publication. 2. Notification by e-newsletter. 3. Attendance at stakeholder event on 25 June 2013. In addition customers have been involved through campaigns run through out the region and interactive resources on the Severn Trent Water website. Accord Housing Association Act on Energy Advice UK - West Midlands Age Concern Powys Age UK Derby and Derbyshire Age UK Herefordshire & Worcestershire Age UK Leicestershire & Rutland Age UK North Staffordshire Age UK Northamptonshire Age UK Oxfordshire Age UK Shropshire Telford & Wrekin Age UK South Staffordshire Age UK Warwickshire Age UK Gloucestershire Amber Valley Borough Council Anglian Water Angling Trust Ashby Civic Society Ashfield District Council Ashram Housing Association Asra Midlands Housing Association Association of Inland Navigation Authorities Aston University Avon Navigation Trust Avon Wildlife Trust Banner Homes Banner Homes Midlands Barratt Homes Barratt Homes and David Wilson Homes - North Midlands Bassetlaw District Council BCHS Beacon Energy Limited Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire, Northamptonshire Wildlife Trusts Beeston CAB Bellway Ben Bailey Homes Berkeley Group Beth Johnson Housing Association Birmingham & Black Country Wildlife Trust
    [Show full text]