Changing Serbian Ethnic Patterns in the 20Th Century Within the Borders

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Changing Serbian Ethnic Patterns in the 20Th Century Within the Borders pzc GEOGRAPHICA ANNONICA No7; p 27-30 icant Serbian population to move towards Hungary. Up until the Turkish Occupation Changing Serbian Ethnic – when the Serbian ethnic area reached its largest extent in present-day Hungary – there was a growth in the number and ratio Patterns in the 20th Century of the Serbian-speaking population of or- thodox religion, which contributed to their Within the Borders of gradual ethnic expansion. As a result of these migration processes, their ethnic pat- terns mark three well-defined, connected Present-day Hungary1 territories of various sizes. Since the 18th century - in parallel with Bottlik, Z* the more intensive migration of the Serbs towards the further South - then after World War I due to the options, then the lin- Abstract The main aim of the present paper uring the last three centuries the guistic assimilation to a smaller extent, the is to show the time - space dynamics of history of Serbs living in the cen- Serbs’ ethnic areas have gradually been de- the Serbian ethnic territory during the Dtre of the Balkans has been rath- creasing in present-day Hungary. This can 20th century in the present-day area of er stormy and burdened with wars. This be seen from sources since the beginning of Hungary, and also the changes and present shows in the considerable changes of their the 18th century – though sometimes insuf- state of their population number, their pro- ethnic territory as well. During the ad- ficient– and data from regular censuses. portion and linguistic-(ethnic) boundaries vancing of the Ottoman Army, the Serbs The bloody events of World War I and on regional and settlement level.In the last found themselves in the front line which the following peace treaties created a com- chapter we try to highlight the connection resulted in the relocation of their ethnic pletely new situation. Whereas approxi- between the ethnicity and the minority territories mainly to North and West. This mately half million Hungarian-speaking self-government system of the Serbian process lasted until the 18th century, dur- communities living in one block in Bácska minority in Hungary, too. ing which a considerable number of Serbs became part of the newly formed Kingdom settled down in Hungary and in various of Serbs-Croats and Slovenes (later Yugo- Key words ethnic geography, Serbian parts of Croatia, where having enjoyed a slavia), the majority of the Serbian settle- minority, Hungary, minority self-govern- special legal status, they became residents ments also became part of the new state. It ment bodies of the so-called military frontier zone. is only a couple of communities with signif- Meanwhile, due to their continous migra- icant Serbian population along the Dan- tion, a reduction of their original territo- ube (in the vicinity of Budapest), to the ries can be observed in Kosovo, Methohila East of Baranya county and South-East and in the territories of the later Sandžak Hungary forming part of our research, (Jelavich, B. 1996). that stayed within the borders of present- After World War I, following the estab- day Hungary. (Figure 1.) lishment of the Kingdom of Serbs-Croats After the withdrawal of the Serbian and Slovenes (later Yugoslavia), the Ser- Army and the exploitation of the possi- bian ethnic area expanded mainly with- bilities of options, Serbs mainly living in in the territories of the new state, where- the Eastern part of Baranya county and in as outside the borders – in Hungary and the Tisza-Maros region, left the country in Romania – a considerable number of Serbs large numbers and moved to the other side found themselves in minority (Mihajlović, of the borders (Urosevics, D. 1969; Oltvai, 1919). Their more rapid regression can still F. 1991). Therefore only a small number of be seen. This process is primarily due to Serbs are still inhabitants of the 93.030 sq. the repatriations and options within the km present-day Hungary. borders of present-day Hungary. The drastic drop in their numbers is The disintegration of Tito’s Yugosla- demonstrated by data from 1920 and even via from 1991, then its entire collapse better from 1930, since it was due to the significantly rearranged the Serbian eth- options given that a significant number nic settlement pattern. As a result, on the of Serbs in Hungary could move to the independent territories of the former Yu- newly established SHS Kingdom 8later goslavia – Croatia, Bosnia and in the au- Yugoslavia)(Popović, D.I. 1957). (Figure tonomus Kosovo within Serbia until 1989 2.) As a result their numbers were 5443 – the number and proportion of Serbs in 1941 and there are only 36 settlements have drastically dropped, whereas in Ser- on the studied area where the ratio of Ser- bia, above all in Voivodina, the opposite bian native speakers is at least 1%. Among can be seen. these it is just Lórév where they are in ab- solute majority with a ratio of 69%. Their 1910-1990 number is also significant in Szigetcsép The first smaller Serbian minority groups where 14% of the population is of Serbian in Hungary could already be traced in the mother tongue. Their ratio is more than * Zsolt Bottlik, Research Fellow, Geographical Middle Ages, however, it was the advancing 10% in four settlements (Deszk, Battonya, Research Institute of Hungarian Academy of of the Ottoman (Turkish) Empire to North Százhalombatta, Újszentiván) and they Sciences, Department of Human Geography and North-West that caused the first signif- live in diaspora with a ratio of 1-10% in 13 27 GEOGRAPHICA ANNONICA pzc Century Within th the Borders of Present-day Hungary Present-day of the Borders Changing Serbian Ethnic Patterns in the 20 Figure 1 The ratio of Serbs in Hungary and their bigger settlements according to their mother tongue in 1910; Source: Hungarian census data 1910 (mother tongue - native language) other settlements. Due to their big loss- in favour of the existence of the minori- area as well, therefore their settling process es it is only in the case of Battonya where ty groups with smaller numbers and ratio could cause the breaking up of the minor- their numbers exceed 1000 inhabitants. living in Hungary. It is especially true of ity communities, providing more opportu- The population of the other 11 larger Ser- the Serbian minority with more than nities for the Hungarian assimilation pres- bian groups is between 100 and 350. 5000 persons. Only the years preceding sure, eg., in case of the former settlements During and after World War II the eth- the change of regime bring some altera- in the vicinity of Budapest and Szeged with nic settlement pattern of the Serbs already tion and bigger publicity to these minori- a significant number of Serbs (Kocsis, K. living sporadically in present-day Hunga- ties. The reason for the decrease in number 1989). On the other hand, the economical- ry does not show a significant change. The and ratio of Serbian minority and also that ly more underdevelopped territories urge ethnic data in the 1949 census do not in all of their ethnic area is due to the weaken- the younger generation to migrate causing cases show the real situation, however, the ing of their national self-awareness which not only the decrease of their number and data referring to religion provide a more re- was caused by their assimilation. ratio but the disasterous ageing of the eth- liable picture. Based on the above mentioned The Serbs’ strong identity-conscious- nic population (eg., in East Baranya). data, the number of Serbs living in Hungary ness, the above-mentioned assimilation Studying the data from 1990 it becomes decreased only by 284 in eight years. Accord- processes and their numbers are partly re- obvious that the once so significant Serbian ing to census data, their ratio in their settle- lated to the geographical environment of presence has reduced. Although their ap- ments shows an average 2-3% change. There their settlements. The question is whether pearance in new settlements manifests it- existed 12 settlements with more than 100 their place of residence is the urban region, self in a slight change, the significant de- Serbs. The biggest settlement was Battonya which is the primary source of the main so- crease since the end of World War II is due with 485 Serbs and there were four settle- cial-economic modernization, or is it the to the linguistic assimilation. It can be ments with more than 300 Serbs (Magyarc- severely underpriviledged peripheral areas, seen that from the 18th century the ratio sanád, Lórév, Pomáz and Deszk). which offer worse living conditions. The of the Serbs undergoes a gradual decrease, The proletarian internationalism of aformentioned urban territories are obvi- there are less settlements where they are the period following World War II was not ously the majority of Hungarians’ target in majority, in fact , by 1990, with the ex- ception of Lórév, it falls below 25% in all PPP their settlements (Hoóz, I.-Kepecs, J.-Klin- ger, A. 1985). The greatest loss, over 10%, is in Lórév and Battonya, whose settlements are the most important in the Serbian eth- nic territory. In the case of Pomáz, Csobán- ka, Lippó, Szigetcsép and Százhalombat- ta the loss is 5-10%. This process requires the usage of the Hungarian language which might in a while result in the Serbian moth- Figure 2 Changes in the number of Serbs in present-day area of Hungary (1773-2001) er tongue being pushed into the back- 28 pzc GEOGRAPHICA ANNONICA Bottlik, Z. ground. Studying the position of the Ser- bian communities shows that they live in a rather scattered settlement pattern.
Recommended publications
  • The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800S-1900S
    The Shaping of Bulgarian and Serbian National Identities, 1800s-1900s February 2003 Katrin Bozeva-Abazi Department of History McGill University, Montreal A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 Contents 1. Abstract/Resume 3 2. Note on Transliteration and Spelling of Names 6 3. Acknowledgments 7 4. Introduction 8 How "popular" nationalism was created 5. Chapter One 33 Peasants and intellectuals, 1830-1914 6. Chapter Two 78 The invention of the modern Balkan state: Serbia and Bulgaria, 1830-1914 7. Chapter Three 126 The Church and national indoctrination 8. Chapter Four 171 The national army 8. Chapter Five 219 Education and national indoctrination 9. Conclusions 264 10. Bibliography 273 Abstract The nation-state is now the dominant form of sovereign statehood, however, a century and a half ago the political map of Europe comprised only a handful of sovereign states, very few of them nations in the modern sense. Balkan historiography often tends to minimize the complexity of nation-building, either by referring to the national community as to a monolithic and homogenous unit, or simply by neglecting different social groups whose consciousness varied depending on region, gender and generation. Further, Bulgarian and Serbian historiography pay far more attention to the problem of "how" and "why" certain events have happened than to the emergence of national consciousness of the Balkan peoples as a complex and durable process of mental evolution. This dissertation on the concept of nationality in which most Bulgarians and Serbs were educated and socialized examines how the modern idea of nationhood was disseminated among the ordinary people and it presents the complicated process of national indoctrination carried out by various state institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbian Language in Education in Hungary
    The Serbian language in education in Hungary European Research Centre on Multilingualism and Language Learning hosted by SERBIAN The Serbian language in education in Hungary c/o Fryske Akademy Doelestrjitte 8 P.O. Box 54 NL-8900 AB Ljouwert/Leeuwarden The Netherlands T 0031 (0) 58 - 234 3027 W www.mercator-research.eu E [email protected] | Regional dossiers series | t ca r cum n n i- ual e : Available in this series: This document was published by the Mercator European Research Centre on Multilingualism Albanian; the Albanian language in education in Italy and Language Learning with financial support from the Fryske Akademy and the Province Asturian; the Asturian language in education in Spain (2nd ed.) of Fryslân. Basque; the Basque language in education in France (2nd ed.) Basque; the Basque language in education in Spain (2nd ed.) Breton; the Breton language in education in France (2nd ed.) Catalan; the Catalan language in education in France Catalan; the Catalan language in education in Spain (2nd ed.) © Mercator European Research Centre on Multilingualism Cornish; the Cornish language in education in the UK and Language Learning, 2014 Corsican; the Corsican language in education in France (2nd ed.) Croatian; the Croatian language in education in Austria ISSN: 1570 – 1239 Frisian; the Frisian language in education in the Netherlands (4th ed.) 1st edition Friulian; the Friulian language in education in Italy Gaelic; the Gaelic language in education in the UK The contents of this dossier may be reproduced in print, except for commercial purposes, Galician; the Galician language in education in Spain provided that the extract is proceeded by a complete reference to the Mercator European German; the German language in education in Alsace, France (2nd ed.) Research Centre on Multilingualism and Language Learning.
    [Show full text]
  • AFTER DAYTON: Lessons of the Bosnian Peace Process
    AFTER DAYTON: Lessons of the Bosnian Peace Process A Council Symposium COUNCIL ON FOREIGN RELATIONS AFTER DAYTON: Lessons of the Bosnian Peace Process A Council Symposium Ruth Wedgwood, Editor The Council on Foreign Relations, Inc., a nonprofit, nonpartisan national organization and think tank founded in 1921, is dedicated to promoting understanding of international affairs through free and civil exchange of ideas. The Council's members are dedicated to the belief that America's peace and prosperity are firmly linked to that of the world. From this flows the Council's mission: to foster America's understanding of other nations—their peo- ples, cultures, histories, hopes, quarrels, and ambitions—and thus to serve our nation through study and debate, private and public. From time to time books, reports, and papers written by members of the Council's research staff or others are published as a "Council on Foreign Relations Publication." THE COUNCIL TAKES NO INSTITUTIONAL POSITION ON POLICY ISSUES AND HAS NO AFFILIATION WITH THE U.S. GOVERNMENT. ALL STATEMENTS OF FACT AND EXPRESSIONS OF OPINION CONTAINED IN ALL ITS PUBLICATIONS ARE THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUTHOR OR AUTHORS. For further information on Council publications, please write the Council on Foreign Relations, 58 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021, or call the Director of Communications at (212) 434-9400. Or visit our website at www.cfr.org. Copyright © 1999 by the Council on Foreign Relations, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. This book may not be reproduced, in whole or in part, in any form (beyond that copying permitted by Sections 107 and 108 of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Yugoslavia | International Encyclopedia of the First World War
    Version 1.0 | Last updated 18 July 2016 Yugoslavia By Ljubinka Trgovčević The idea for the unification of the Southern Slavs emerged in the 19th century and the strength of its appeal varied over the course of its development. During the First World War, unification became the main war aim of the government of the Kingdom of Serbia as well as the Yugoslav Committee. In different ways, these two groups advocated for Yugoslav unification, resulting in the creation of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes at the end of the war. Table of Contents 1 Introduction 2 Early ideas about the Unification of Southern Slavs 3 Triune Croatian Kingdom 4 On the Eve of War 5 Unity as a War Aim: 1914-1918 6 Montenegrin and Yugoslav Unity 7 Conclusion Notes Selected Bibliography Citation Introduction The origins of Yugoslavism, or the idea of the cultural and political unification of the Southern Slavs (“jug”, i.e.Y ug means “south”) can be traced back to the 1830s and the emergence of the Illyrian movement. At that time, a group of Croatian intellectuals, in order to resist the Magyarisation and Germanisation carried out by the Habsburg Monarchy, developed a program which aimed, on the one hand, to unify Croats and, on the other hand, to gather Southern Slavs into a single cultural and ethnic entity. During the 19th century, Southern Slavs lived in the large, multinational Habsburg and Ottoman empires as well as in Serbia and Montenegro, which had emerged as small, independent nation-states by 1878. Croats envisioned their unification either within the Habsburg Monarchy as the Triune Croatian Kingdom or within the framework of an independent Southern Slav state; the Slovenes took a similar position.
    [Show full text]
  • Serbs in Romania Relationship Between Ethnic and Religious Identity
    Aleksandra Djurić-Milovanović DOI: 10.2298/BALC1243117D Original scholarly work Institute for Balkan Studies Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts Belgrade Serbs in Romania Relationship between Ethnic and Religious Identity Abstract: The paper looks at the role of religion in the ethnic identity of the Serbs in Romania, based on the fieldwork conducted in August 2010 among the Serbian communities in the Danube Gorge (Rom. Clisura Dunării; loc. Ser. Banatska kli- sura), western Romania. A historical perspective being necessary in studying and understanding the complexities of identity structures, the paper offers a brief histori- cal overview of the Serbian community in Romania. Serbs have been living in the Banat since medieval times, their oldest settlements dating back to the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. Today, they mostly live in western Romania (Timiş, Arad, Caraş-Severin and Mehedinţi counties), Timişoara being their cultural, political and religious centre. Over the last decades, the community has been numerically declin- ing due to strong assimilation processes and demographic trends, as evidenced by successive census data (34,037 in 1977; 29,408 in 1992; 22,518 in 2002). The major- ity belong to the Serbian Orthodox Church (Diocese of Timişoara), but a number of neo-Protestant churches have appeared in the last decades. The research focuses on the role of the Orthodox religion among the Serbian minority in Romania and the role of new religious communities in relation to national identity. The role of the dominant Serbian Orthodox Church in preserving and strengthening ethnic identity is looked at, but also influences of other religious traditions which do not overlap with any particular ethnic group, such as neo-Protestantism.
    [Show full text]
  • 24 Serbs in Hungary by Peter Miklos
    24 Serbs in Hungary by Peter Miklos Some South Slav population already existed in the southern and south- eastern part of the Carpathian Basin when the Magyar Conquest occurred at the turn of the 9-10 th century. These ethnic Serbian and Bulgarian groups -- professing the Orthodox religion -- formed part of the population of the southern territory governed by Ajtony who rebelled and lost (in 1028) against King Saint Stephen, organizer of the Christian state and its first king. Over time, there were several dynastic links between the ancient Magyar rulers of the House of Arpad and the Serb nobility. The most significant moment was the marriage of Bela II (the Blind) who ruled between 1131 and 1141, and Ilona, daughter of the Serb grand župan (ruling prince), Uros. The matrimonial ties between the ruling Magyar and Serb families and the political elite resulted in an influential Serb community in the country which, however, did not lead to a significant influx of immigrants. Significant arrival into Hungary of Serbs occurred in the 14 th century as a result of the expansion of the Ottoman Empire. The immediate reason for their northward migration was the termination of the independent Serbian state. This was preceded by battle loss to the Turks in 1389 at the Battle of Kosovo (Hung: Rigómez ő), where Lazar, the Serb ruler, also fell. This battle became the center of Serb national memory and the birth of national identity, its recollection featuring prominently in literature, ballads and folk songs, reminding the Christian Serbs of their struggle against Turkish Islam.
    [Show full text]
  • Hungary and the Hungarians
    S.J. MAGYARÓDY Hungary and the Hungarians MATTHIAS CORVINUS PUBLISHERS Editor: Szabolcs J. Magyarody Principal translators: Péter Csermely, István Hegedűs Dr. Csaba Horváth, Judit Jókay Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 1-882785-23-1 Library of Congress Control Number: 2012947893 All expenses were contributed by North-American Hungarians No governments or government supported organizations contributed a single penny to the publication of this book and CD 2 CONTENTS FOREWORD ................................................................................................ 5 WHO ARE WE? ........................................................................................... 7 C. A. Macartney D. Litt. HUNGARY – A SHORT HISTORY * .................... 9 Fritz-Konrad Krüger HUNGARY AND WORLD WAR I. .......................... 18 László Gulyás A SHORT HISTORY OF THE TREATY OF TRIANON ..... 26 Yves De Daruvar THE TRAGIC FATE OF HUNGARY ............................ 33 John Flournoy Montgomery OPINION OF AN AMERICAN DIPLOMAT 38 J. F. Montgomery HUNGARIAN DECLARATION OF WAR ..................... 42 S.J. Magyaródy THE CENTRAL EUROPEAN SYNDROME .................... 47 RECOVERY OF LOST TERRITORIES ...................................................... 50 Dr. Edward Chászár THE FIRST VIENNA AWARD ................................. 52 RETAKING SUBCARPATHIA ................................................................... 54 THE SECOND VIENNA AWARD .............................................................. 56 TERRITORY CEDED BY ROUMANIA
    [Show full text]
  • Mathematics in the Austrian-Hungarian Empire
    Mathematics in the Austrian-Hungarian Empire Aleksandar M. Nikolić Mathematical education in the province of Vojvodina within the Habsburg Monarchy In: Martina Bečvářová (author); Christa Binder (author): Mathematics in the Austrian-Hungarian Empire. Proceedings of a Symposium held in Budapest on August 1, 2009 during the XXIII ICHST. (English). Praha: Matfyzpress, 2010. pp. 109–124. Persistent URL: http://dml.cz/dmlcz/400824 Terms of use: © Bečvářová, Martina © Binder, Christa Institute of Mathematics of the Czech Academy of Sciences provides access to digitized documents strictly for personal use. Each copy of any part of this document must contain these Terms of use. This document has been digitized, optimized for electronic delivery and stamped with digital signature within the project DML-CZ: The Czech Digital Mathematics Library http://dml.cz MATHEMATICAL EDUCATION IN THE PROVINCE OF VOJVODINA WITHIN THE HABSBURG MONARCHY ALEKSANDAR M. NIKOLIĆ Abstract: In the history of education in Vojvodina and the history of mathematics as its part, the Serbs play the most prominent role until the end of World War II. In the Habsburg Monarchy, and in Vojvodina as its province, the school curricula, text-books and teaching methods were determined by the monarch’s order. The main characteristics of mathematics education in Vojvodina during this period were that it was not conducted by trained mathematicians and that the prevailing methodology was oriented towards the practice of doing calculations without the theoretical bases in algebra or geometry. AMS Subj. Class. 01A50, 01A55, 97-03 Key words: mathematics, education, teaching, Habsburg Monarchy, Vojvodina, Serbs 1 Introduction Vojvodina, as a multinational and multicultural southern part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, was regarded as a province by all its citizens but the Serbs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of National Minorities in Serbia and EU Negotiations: the Role of Neighbouring Countries
    NATIONAL MINORITIES IN SERBIA’S RELATIONSHIP WITH THE NEIGHBOURS The Status of National Minorities in Serbia and EU Negotiations: The Role of Neighbouring Countries Belgrade, March 2017 National Minorities in Serbia’s Relationship with the Neighbours The Status of National Minorities in Serbia and EU Negotiations: The Role of Neighbouring Countries Belgrade, March 2017 Kraljice Natalije 45/VII 11000 Beograd, Srbija +381 11 36 20 804 [email protected] • www.fer.org.rs This Policy Paper has been prepared as part of the “Status of National Minorities in Serbia and EU Integrations: The Role of Neighboring Countries” project, supported by the British Embassy Belgrade, and the “Minority Policy and European Integrations – the Role of Bilateral Relations” project, supported by the Open Society Foundation Serbia. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the donors. FORUM CIP - Каталогизација у публикацији Народна библиотека Србије, Београд Year 7, issue nr. 1 Publisher 323.1 Forum za etničke odnose, Beograd FORUM / glavni urednik Nenad Đurđević. - Editor in chief God. 3, br. 2 (2013)- . - Beograd : Forum Nenad Đurđević za etničke odnose, 2013- (Beograd : Dosije studio). - 30 cm Proofreading Štrikla Povremeno. - Preuzima numeraciju engl. izd. Prepress - Ima izdanje na drugom jeziku: Forum - Forum Atelje, Beograd for Ethnic Relations = ISSN 1451-6357 ISSN 2335-0490 = Forum (Forum za etničke Printing odnose) Dosije studio, Beograd COBISS.SR-ID 207523340 Published periodically Contents Introduction ........................................................................5 1. Context information .......................................................7 2. The minority policy of the Republic of Serbia and the improvement of the status of national minorities ..........9 2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Aleksandra Djurić-Milovanović Serbs in Romania
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Serbian Academy of Science and Arts Digital Archive (DAIS) Aleksandra Djurić-Milovanović DOI: 10.2298/BALC1243117D Original scholarly work Institute for Balkan Studies Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts Belgrade Serbs in Romania Relationship between Ethnic and Religious Identity Abstract: The paper looks at the role of religion in the ethnic identity of the Serbs in Romania, based on the fieldwork conducted in August 2010 among the Serbian communities in the Danube Gorge (Rom. Clisura Dunării; loc. Ser. Banatska kli- sura), western Romania. A historical perspective being necessary in studying and understanding the complexities of identity structures, the paper offers a brief histori- cal overview of the Serbian community in Romania. Serbs have been living in the Banat since medieval times, their oldest settlements dating back to the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. Today, they mostly live in western Romania (Timiş, Arad, Caraş-Severin and Mehedinţi counties), Timişoara being their cultural, political and religious centre. Over the last decades, the community has been numerically declin- ing due to strong assimilation processes and demographic trends, as evidenced by successive census data (34,037 in 1977; 29,408 in 1992; 22,518 in 2002). The major- ity belong to the Serbian Orthodox Church (Diocese of Timişoara), but a number of neo-Protestant churches have appeared in the last decades. The research focuses on the role of the Orthodox religion among the Serbian minority in Romania and the role of new religious communities in relation to national identity. The role of the dominant Serbian Orthodox Church in preserving and strengthening ethnic identity is looked at, but also influences of other religious traditions which do not overlap with any particular ethnic group, such as neo-Protestantism.
    [Show full text]
  • Political Rights of the Serbs in the Region 2018 REPORT SUMMARY
    Political rights of the Serbs in the region 2018 REPORT SUMMARY Belgrade, 2018. POLITICAL RIGHTS OF THE SERBS IN THE REGION 2018 REPORT SUMMARY Publisher NGO Progresive club Zahumska 23B/86, 11 000 Belgrade, Serbia www.napredniklub.org, [email protected] For publisher Čedomir Antić Editor Čedomir Antić Written by Čedomir Antić Milan Dinić Ivana Leščen Miloš Vulević Vladimir Stanisavljev Aleksa Negić Branislav Tođer Aleksandar Ćurić Branko Okiljević Igor Vuković Translated by Miljana Protić Editorial board Miljan Premović Print and graphic design Pavle Halupa Jovana Vuković Printed by Shprint ISSN 1821-200X Print in: 1000 copies Progressive club POLITICAL RIGHTS OF THE SERBS IN THE REGION 2018 REPORT SUMMARY (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Republic of Croatia, Montenegro, Republic of Macedonia (FYRM), Albania, Republic Slovenia, Hungary, Romania, Kosovo and Metohija – Kosovo - UNMIK) Report for 2017/2018. No. 10 Belgrade, 2018. CONTENTS: Introduction . 7 Republic of Albania . 18 Bosnia and Hezegovina – The Republic of Srpska . 32 Republic of Croatia . .65 Hungary . .97 Kosovo and Metohija – Kosovo-UNMIK . 109 Republic of Macedonia (Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia) . 119 Montenegro . 153 Romania . 171 Republic of Slovenia . 181 Conclusion . 190 6 INTRODUCTION The Progressive Club, a Belgrade-based civil society organization, has been publishing reports on the political rights of the Serbian people in the region since 2009. This is its tenth annual report. Serbs are the largest nation based and concentrated in the territory of the Balkans, a large peninsula in Southeast Europe. The Balkans is the only European peninsula where geographic and historical reasons have always precluded the creation of a unified and functional modern state gov- erned by the domicile population.
    [Show full text]
  • Austro-Hungarian War Aims in the Balkans During World War I
    BOOK FORUM Austro-Hungarian War Aims in the Balkans during World War I, by Marvin Benjamin Fried, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2014, 294 pp., £63.00 (hardback), ISBN 978-1- 137-35900-1 The empire strikes back John Paul Newman [email protected] ©John Paul Newman I am delighted to accept the invitation from the editorial board of the Journal of Genocide Research to discuss Marvin Fried’s new book. I have read the book as carefully and closely as possible. Nevertheless, as is often the case, my comments are to a great extent a reflection of my own research interests and their intersections with Fried’s book. The book made me think again about the critical relationship between Austria-Hungary and Serbia, and it also got me thinking about the trajectories between the First and Second World Wars in the Balkan region, and of the possibility of comparing cultures of violence in 1914–18 with those of 1941–45. There is much more to be said about the many topics that Fried’s book raises, and no doubt other contributors will pick up on points that go unmentioned here. Let me first give the work its due praise. Fried’s monograph is a fine example of the small renaissance taking place in the field of diplomatic history in recent years. It is based on meti- culous research conducted in archives across central Europe and in several languages. Fried demonstrates a keen understanding of the discussions about how and why political and mili- tary elites conduct war in the modern period.
    [Show full text]