DOCSLIB.ORG

Report from the 2011 Israel Symposium: Reflections on a Country in Turmoil

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report from the 2011 Israel Symposium: Reflections on a Country in Turmoil Report from the 2011 Israel Symposium: Reflections on a Country in Turmoil Israel is experiencing momentous changes, both domestically and in its foreign relations, and the developments of the next few months are likely to shape the country for decades to come. This is the overall impression I bring back from my 10-day working trip to Israel and Palestine, including 7 days with Meretz USA’s incomparable travel- and-learning program, the Israel Symposium. Having met more than 50 individuals – Jewish and Arab; Israeli and Palestinian; left, right and center; senior politicians, activists, intellectuals, journalists and ‘regular folk’ – in over a dozen locations, my mind is still awash with fresh information, new data, contrasting assessments and conflicting narratives. Here are some of my unbleached reflections: 1. The “Arab Spring” is an opportunity that must not be wasted. By and large, the pro-democracy movement sweeping across North Africa and the Middle East is not preoccupied with Israel or Israeli policy, and it certainly has no built-in anti-Israeli agenda. But that is not to say that the citizenry there is indifferent to the fate of the Palestinians. Like almost the entire rest of the world, they are fed up with Israeli settlement, and want to see the occupation end with an independent state of Palestine. As new Arab governments begin to take power, their immediate focus will be domestic issues, and their foreign policy will still be malleable. Israel has an opportunity to lay the foundation for solid neighborly relations if it swiftly joins the effort to reach an equitable resolution to the Israeli- Palestinian conflict. Failure to do so – reliance on American support to try and maintain the untenable status quo, or perhaps worse – could poison relations with a new generation of Arab leaders for years to come. 2. The battle for (and against) Israeli democracy has been joined. It has taken time for Israeli centrists to wake up to the true danger to Israeli democracy represented by Avigdor Lieberman, Danny Danon, Michael Ben Ari and other members of Knesset. Now that they are starting to, they are helping to energize Israel’s pro-democracy and pro-human rights community, which in January produced the left’s largest rally in recent years (which hundreds of you supported through Meretz USA’s online campaign). Indeed, following the assault launched by the Im Tirtzu movement (the group that depicted Naomi Chazan with a horn on her head) against Israel’s human rights NGOs, these organizations have seen a sharp uptick in their Israel-based fundraising. But before we uncork the champagne, it’s important to remember that Israel’s anti-democrats are still the stronger force, exploiting the fear and lethargy of much of Israel’s mainstream to advance legislation such as the just- approved “Admissions Committee” law. This anti-democratic law, passed while I was in Israel, thanks to the decision of Kadima party Knesset members to stay neutral, allows rural, Jewish-majority communities to reject Palestinian Arab citizens (or others) for residency on the basis of a vague, subjective “social unsuitability” criterion. 3. The threat to democracy is creating a New Left in Israel. The assault on Israel’s democratic principles, and the understanding that this is no longer “just” about anti-Arab discrimination, is creating a new awareness among Israeli democrats, Jewish and Arab, that they need to unite around their shared citizenship, rather than remain divided along ethnic/national/religious lines. Allegiance to ideals is trumping allegiance to the tribe. Israel’s human rights community is thus moving past the old ‘co-existence’ model to embrace the more inclusive, integrative ideal of a ‘shared society’ in which Arabs and Jews work, learn and struggle together. This is the sensibility that is guiding the organizers of the Sheikh Jarrah Solidarity movement, for example, and the founders of the bilingual Jewish-Arab Hagar school in Beersheva. Though this is by no means a mass movement, it boasts an impressive array of young, up-and-coming leaders who are arriving at different answers because they are asking different questions. When one such Jewish Israeli leader was asked, for example, whether her ideas still allow her to support the two- state solution, she replied that regardless of whether it was one, two or ten states, the more important issue was whether the state in which she lived cherished true equality, democracy and human rights for all. 4. Expect major shifts in Israel’s parliamentary center-left: The politicians and parties representing Israel’s left-of-center community have reached the conclusion that they are far too splintered and far too small, and that they need to come together to create a significant parliamentary bloc. But that doesn’t mean that this will necessarily come to fruition. As we were reminded during the trip, politicians also have agendas and egos, and the question of who will lead and who will follow, and of which campaign themes will be out-front and which relegated to a small mention in the platform might get in the way of the much-discussed union. The other question still in play is who will be part of this new party or electoral list. Most of the people we spoke to suggested that the new party will be “between Kadima and Hadash” – i.e., that it will be composed of Meretz, the remnants of Labor, the Green Movement and other smaller groups. But other possibilities were raised as well – that the new party could draw off some of the left-wing members of Kadima; or that the new party would be based on Meretz and Hadash, rather than Meretz and Labor. Although, by law, elections don’t have to take place until late 2013, there is a prevailing sense that political developments could force elections to occur much sooner (see next entry). The parliamentary center-left knows this, and is getting ready. 5. September 2011 will be a turning-point. With Israeli-Palestinian negotiations indefinitely in mothballs, the Palestinian Authority (PA) has decided that rather than wait for a new, hopefully moderate, government to emerge in Israel, it will turn to the international community as a way of jumpstarting diplomatic movement. It is almost definite that this September, the PA will appeal to the UN for admission as a member-state, the “State of Palestine”, which would be defined as including all the land beyond the Green Line: East Jerusalem, the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Should this occur, Israel would no longer be regarded as the occupier of ‘disputed territory’, but of the sovereign territory of another UN member. Although no one is yet sure how this move will play out, the potential repercussions for Israel could be severe – including a level of international isolation unlike anything we have seen to date. Meanwhile, the PA figures with whom we met, including Yasser Abd Rabbo and Nabil Sha’ath, are displaying pride and confidence: They seem invigorated by the feeling that they have taken their future into their own hands and are no longer begging for ‘scraps’ at the ‘Israeli table’. They are also employing a refreshing discourse of non-violence, state-building and ‘post-victimhood’. The choices made by the Israeli government, and Israeli people, come September will be crucial to the nation’s future. 6. Americans – particularly American Jews – can help. It was instructive to see how much impact a group like ours could have – just by showing up in Israel and representing our values and beliefs. Senior politicians with whom we met informed our organizer what a strong impression we had made with them. Palestinian workers patiently awaiting their turn to cross into Israel via the Kalandia checkpoint in northern Jerusalem wanted us to know that our appearance there, together with Hanna Barag of Machsom Watch, had made Israeli security treat them much more humanely that day. The residents of the unrecognized Bedouin village of Al Araqib, fighting eviction, were strengthened not only by the funds we raised for them, but by our readiness to show our solidarity with them in searing 90-degree heat. I come away from these last two weeks reinforced in the belief that for pro- peace, pro-democracy American Jews to play an influential role, we need to put our feet on the ground as often as possible and involve ourselves first- hand with the building of a more progressive Israel. In Jerusalem and Tel Aviv-Jaffa, in Haifa, in Sderot, Beersheva and Nazareth, as interns, professional volunteers, students, interlocutors, and observers – as partners with an embattled Israeli left fighting for the country’s future. Shabbat Shalom, Ron Skolnik Executive Director Meretz USA.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Post-Election Coalition Scenarios, Part II by David Eden
    Post-Election Coalition Scenarios, Part II by David Eden Two other parties that may be possible coalition partners: · United Torah Judaism – Essentially, it is only concerned with internal issues. Its real demand is maintaining social services and allowances for their constituents. Other issues: Maintaining the powers of the Orthodox Rabbinical Courts over civil issues such as marriage, divorce, burial, etc. are among their top priorities, along with maintaining the Sabbath laws preventing work on the “Holy Day”, laws keeping ultra-Orthodox youth out of army service, etc. Although their constituency is sympathetic to the settlers and the Right, the leadership stresses that they are willing to support any coalition that accedes to their demands. As Olmert does not need them to guarantee the stability of the coalition, he won’t be “courting” them. Some of the issues that may affect their position in coalition negotiations are their rivalry with Shas and their often-confrontational relations with Meretz and groups within the Labor party over freedom of religion. · Meretz – The party that is the Israeli equivalent of the “Democratic wing of the Democratic Party”, Meretz and its predecessors have been at the forefront of not only the contacts that led to direct negotiations between Israel and the PLO (and the ensuing Oslo Accords), but from the earliest days after the creation of the State of Israel also have led the struggle for equal rights for Israel’s Arab citizens, labor & union rights, women’s rights, freedom of the press and freedom of religion issues, gay rights, etc. It endorses negotiated withdrawal from almost all of the West Bank, including parts of Jerusalem.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict
    Leap of Faith: Israel’s National Religious and the Israeli- Palestinian Conflict Middle East Report N°147 | 21 November 2013 International Crisis Group Headquarters Avenue Louise 149 1050 Brussels, Belgium Tel: +32 2 502 90 38 Fax: +32 2 502 50 38 [email protected] Table of Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................... i Recommendations..................................................................................................................... iv I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 II. Religious Zionism: From Ascendance to Fragmentation ................................................ 5 A. 1973: A Turning Point ................................................................................................ 5 B. 1980s and 1990s: Polarisation ................................................................................... 7 C. The Gaza Disengagement and its Aftermath ............................................................. 11 III. Settling the Land .............................................................................................................. 14 A. Bargaining with the State: The Kookists ................................................................... 15 B. Defying the State: The Hilltop Youth ........................................................................ 17 IV. From the Hills to the State ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of the Center
    In Search of the Center By Dahlia Scheindlin After the Second Intifada (2000-2005), Israel appeared to be hurtling towards rightwing politics with no end in sight. From 2009, the towering figurehead of the right, Benjamin Netanyahu, won election after election. As public sentiment veered to the right, parties competed for extreme nationalist and expansionist policies, and there seemed to be no stopping the trend. Yet the party that finally came close to beating Netanyahu in April 2019, then surpassed Likud in a second round in September that year, was not a competitor from the right but a rival from the Israeli center. Blue and White was an unlikely challenger. The party was cobbled together ad hoc ahead of the April 2019 elections, led by three former generals with no obvious political ideology, party institutions or base of support beyond the voters of one of the constituent parties in its joint slate, Yesh Atid. The latter was largely viewed as center-left. Yet somehow, voters knew instinctively where Blue and White fit on Israel’s map – the center. The party’s own leaders worked hard to convey a centrist image as their brand, as well. But do centrist political movements ever succeed in Israel? Can a centrist party become a defining force of Israeli politics, and if so, what exactly does centrism mean in Israel? The Pull of the Center On the face of it, centrist politics sound like a potential antidote to Israel’s notoriously polarized, fragmented, and aggressive political culture. A center party could become a vehicle to promote moderation and pragmatic policies, in theory.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Ultra-Orthodox Political Parties in Israeli Democracy
    Luke Howson University of Liverpool The Role of Ultra-Orthodox Political Parties in Israeli Democracy Thesis submitted in accordance with the requirements of the University of Liverpool for the degree of Doctor in Philosophy By Luke Howson July 2014 Committee: Clive Jones, BA (Hons) MA, PhD Prof Jon Tonge, PhD 1 Luke Howson University of Liverpool © 2014 Luke Howson All Rights Reserved 2 Luke Howson University of Liverpool Abstract This thesis focuses on the role of ultra-orthodox party Shas within the Israeli state as a means to explore wider themes and divisions in Israeli society. Without underestimating the significance of security and conflict within the structure of the Israeli state, in this thesis the Arab–Jewish relationship is viewed as just one important cleavage within the Israeli state. Instead of focusing on this single cleavage, this thesis explores the complex structure of cleavages at the heart of the Israeli political system. It introduces the concept of a ‘cleavage pyramid’, whereby divisions are of different saliency to different groups. At the top of the pyramid is division between Arabs and Jews, but one rung down from this are the intra-Jewish divisions, be they religious, ethnic or political in nature. In the case of Shas, the religious and ethnic elements are the most salient. The secular–religious divide is a key fault line in Israel and one in which ultra-orthodox parties like Shas are at the forefront. They and their politically secular counterparts form a key division in Israel, and an exploration of Shas is an insightful means of exploring this division further, its history and causes, and how these groups interact politically.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As Of, January 27, 2015) Elections • in Israel, Elections for the Knesset A
    Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As of, January 27, 2015) Elections In Israel, elections for the Knesset are held at least every four years. As is frequently the case, the outgoing government coalition collapsed due to disagreements between the parties. As a result, the Knesset fell significantly short of seeing out its full four year term. Knesset elections in Israel will now be held on March 17, 2015, slightly over two years since the last time that this occurred. The Basics of the Israeli Electoral System All Israeli citizens above the age of 18 and currently in the country are eligible to vote. Voters simply select one political party. Votes are tallied and each party is then basically awarded the same percentage of Knesset seats as the percentage of votes that it received. So a party that wins 10% of total votes, receives 10% of the seats in the Knesset (In other words, they would win 12, out of a total of 120 seats). To discourage small parties, the law was recently amended and now the votes of any party that does not win at least 3.25% of the total (probably around 130,000 votes) are completely discarded and that party will not receive any seats. (Until recently, the “electoral threshold,” as it is known, was only 2%). For the upcoming elections, by January 29, each party must submit a numbered list of its candidates, which cannot later be altered. So a party that receives 10 seats will send to the Knesset the top 10 people listed on its pre-submitted list.
    [Show full text]
  • Kadima for Half Price? the Formation of a National Unity Government in Israel
    Israel Office_____________________________ Kadima for half price? The formation of a national unity government in Israel . The formation of a national unity government strengthens Prime Minister Netanyahu and gives him new leeway during negotiations. Kadima’s entry to the government strengthens moderate forces and weakens the hardliners. There will be no real change in policy. Kadima failed in opposition, and as a government party it will be even less able to push through a different policy. The agreement between Mofaz and Netanyahu was motivated in the main by domestic political reasons. This is the primary field in which moderate changes will take place rather than in foreign policy. There will be new Israeli offers of talks in the peace process, but no real progress should be expected, together with no surmounting of the present stalemate. It is not clear whether Mofaz will join the moderates or the hardliners in Netanyahu’s security cabinet over the Iran question. Dr. Ralf Hexel FES Israel, May 17, 2012 1 More political power for Netanyahu secure an influential ministerial position for himself? Or is he seeking a change in policy? In a surprise move on May 8, 2012, the opposi- tion Kadima party (28 seats), led by former No early elections - a national unity gov- army head and defense minister Shaul Mofaz, ernment instead joined prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s right leaning-religious government coalition (66 When the Knesset convened on the morning of out of 120 seats). Netanyahu now has a gov- May 7, parliamentarians and public were abso- ernment comprising seven parties; this has a lutely sure that the votes needed to hold early parliamentary majority of 94 and can rightly be elections on September 4, 2012 and to dissolve called a national unity government.
    [Show full text]
  • Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949-2019
    WID.world WORKING PAPER N° 2020/17 Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949-2019 Yonatan Berman August 2020 Inequality, Identity, and the Long-Run Evolution of Political Cleavages in Israel 1949{2019 Yonatan Berman∗ y August 20, 2020 Abstract This paper draws on pre- and post-election surveys to address the long run evolution of vot- ing patterns in Israel from 1949 to 2019. The heterogeneous ethnic, cultural, educational, and religious backgrounds of Israelis created a range of political cleavages that evolved throughout its history and continue to shape its political climate and its society today. De- spite Israel's exceptional characteristics, we find similar patterns to those found for France, the UK and the US. Notably, we find that in the 1960s{1970s, the vote for left-wing parties was associated with lower social class voters. It has gradually become associated with high social class voters during the late 1970s and later. We also find a weak inter-relationship between inequality and political outcomes, suggesting that despite the social class cleavage, identity-based or \tribal" voting is still dominant in Israeli politics. Keywords: Political cleavages, Political economy, Income inequality, Israel ∗London Mathematical Laboratory, The Graduate Center and Stone Center on Socio-Economic Inequality, City University of New York, [email protected] yI wish to thank Itai Artzi, Dror Feitelson, Amory Gethin, Clara Mart´ınez-Toledano, and Thomas Piketty for helpful discussions and comments, and to Leah Ashuah and Raz Blanero from Tel Aviv-Yafo Municipality for historical data on parliamentary elections in Tel Aviv.
    [Show full text]
  • A Threshold Crossed Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution WATCH
    HUMAN RIGHTS A Threshold Crossed Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution WATCH A Threshold Crossed Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution Copyright © 2021 Human Rights Watch All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America ISBN: 978-1-62313-900-1 Cover design by Rafael Jimenez Human Rights Watch defends the rights of people worldwide. We scrupulously investigate abuses, expose the facts widely, and pressure those with power to respect rights and secure justice. Human Rights Watch is an independent, international organization that works as part of a vibrant movement to uphold human dignity and advance the cause of human rights for all. Human Rights Watch is an international organization with staff in more than 40 countries, and offices in Amsterdam, Beirut, Berlin, Brussels, Chicago, Geneva, Goma, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Moscow, Nairobi, New York, Paris, San Francisco, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto, Tunis, Washington DC, and Zurich. For more information, please visit our website: http://www.hrw.org APRIL 2021 ISBN: 978-1-62313-900-1 A Threshold Crossed Israeli Authorities and the Crimes of Apartheid and Persecution Map .................................................................................................................................. i Summary ......................................................................................................................... 2 Definitions of Apartheid and Persecution .................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Increasingly Polarised and Fragmented Party System in Israel Will Make It Difficult for a Stable Government to Emerge from This Month’S Elections
    blo gs.lse.ac.uk http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2013/01/14/israel-elections-2013-israeli-party-system/ The increasingly polarised and fragmented party system in Israel will make it difficult for a stable government to emerge from this month’s elections. Blog Admin Israel’s next parliamentary elections are due to be held on 22 January. As part of EUROPP’s coverage of the European neighbourhood, André Krouwel and Daniel Rajmil give an overview of the country’s highly fragmented party system, noting that the results are likely to be significantly different from those in the last election in 2009. New parties have emerged in the last four years, while the largest party in the current parliament, Kadima, could well lose all of its seats. Of all established democracies, Israel has the highest electoral change per election over the post-war period. Only new democracies in Eastern Europe are more electorally volatile. On average almost a quarter of the Israeli electorate shif ts party allegiance per election. One of the main reasons f or this exceptional electoral volatility is that Israeli elections are held under a system of proportional representation (PR). This means that many political parties will enter the f ray, as it is relatively easy to enter parliament compared to majoritarian electoral systems. Parties will gain a number of seats equal to the proportion of the vote they gained in the election, albeit that Israel has introduced a 2 per cent threshold to avoid too much parliamentary f ragmentation. Nevertheless, over the last decade between 12 and 15 parties entered the Knesset in each election.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel in the Synagogue Dr. Samuel Heilman, Professor of Jewish Studies and Sociology, City University of New York
    Israel in the Synagogue Dr. Samuel Heilman, Professor of Jewish Studies and Sociology, City University of New York Israel in Our Lives is a project sponsored by The CRB Foundation, The Joint Authority for Jewish Zionist Education Department of Jewish Education and Culture in the Diaspora, and The Charles R. Bronfman Centre for the Israel Experience: Mifgashim. In cooperation with Jewish Education Service of North America and Israel Experience, Inc. Israel In Our Lives Online was funded in part through a generous grant from the Joint Program for Jewish Education of the Jewish Agency for Israel and the Ministry of Education and Culture of the State of Israel. The editors would like to thank all the authors, advisors, and consultants of the Israel In Our Lives series— educational leaders who have brought their considerable insights and talents to bear on this project. In addition to those already mentioned in these pages, we extend our appreciation to those who helped in shaping the project concept: Dr. Zvi Bekerman, Gidon Elad, Dr. Cecile Jordan, Rachel Korazim, Clive Lessem, Caren Levine, Dr. Zev Mankowitz, Dr. Eliezer Marcus, & Susan Rodenstein. Part 1 While no one would suggest that the synagogue and Israel are duplicates of one another - and indeed the differences between them are legion - they have in this generation increasingly represented (especially for North American Jewry) two important, parallel symbols of Jewish identity. This is because both are special "places" in which being a Jew constitutes an essential pre-requisite, perhaps even a sine qua non, for affiliation. Additionally, both are places where one expects to find Jews in the overwhelming majority and in charge, where Jewish concerns are paramount, and where Hebrew is spoken.
    [Show full text]
  • Livni's Outlook: Political and Policy Options in Israel
    PolicyWatch #1403 Livni's Outlook: Political and Policy Options in Israel By David Makovsky September 23, 2008 In the wake of Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni's narrow Kadima party victory over Shaul Mofaz last week, Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert resigned on Sunday night. The following day, Israeli president Shimon Peres asked Livni to form a new governing coalition, but if she is unable to do so in the next six weeks, Israel will head for new elections. Regardless of the coalition's makeup, prospects remain bleak in the short term for a breakthrough on either the Palestinian or Syrian track. Political Options If Livni successfully puts together a coalition, Israel would be the only known country where women head all branches of government. Dalia Itzik and Dorit Beinish -- both women -- lead the Israeli parliament and supreme court respectively. Furthermore, a Livni coalition would mark the first time a woman has been an Israeli prime minister in the thirty-four years since Golda Meir. Livni's best prospect for cobbling together the needed sixty-one parliamentarians would be to replicate the existing coalition comprising Kadima (twenty-nine), Labor (nineteen), Shas (twelve), and the Pensioners (seven). As Livni heads into negotiations, she has several advantages. In terms of character, Israelis view her as a counterpoint to Olmert, who is facing a swirl of corruption allegations. And since Mofaz's decision to take a "time out" from Israeli politics, opposition to her within Kadima seems to have quickly dissipated. Moreover, the parties comprising the current government seem to have little interest in challenging the political order because of the significant uncertainty in early elections.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Sense of the Israeli Election
    Non-Profit Organization U.S. Postage PAID Norwich, CT 06360 Permit #329 Serving The Jewish Communities of Eastern Connecticut & Western R.I. CHANGE SERVICE RETURN TO: 28 Channing St., New London, CT 06320 REQUESTED VOL. XLV NO. 8 PUBLISHED BI-WEEKLY APRIL 12, 2019/7 NISAN 5779 NEXT DEADLINE APRIL 19, 2019 16 PAGES HOW TO REACH US - PHONE 860-442-8062 • FAX 860-443-4175 • EMAIL [email protected] • BY MAIL: 28 CHANNING STREET, NEW LONDON, CT 06320 What is Making sense of Besere the Israeli election By Herb Keinon, Jerusalem Post Velt? Al Davis, the iconic owner of the NFL Oakland Raiders football The 25th East- team, had a well-known mott: “Just win, baby!” ern CT Int’l Film It is not important how you win, just that you win. This sentiment Festival opening is Sunday, May 19, Green Bay Packers coach Vince Lombardi, who once said, “Winning 2:00 pm at The isn’treflected everything, the motto it is theof an only even thing.” earlier fabled NFL legend, this time Garde Arts Center A Besere Velt, Boston Workmen’s Circle in New London. It Community Chorus will be featured during Yom truly will be a gala the Jewish Federation’s Gala Opening of the What is true on the football field, is even truer in politics. And opening to cele- its 25th Anniversary Eastern CT Int’l Film Fes- Ha’atzmaut knowsPrime Ministerhow to win. Benjamin He has Netanyahu,the political who antennae is poised to know for the what fifth it takes time brate the festival’s tival on Sunday, May 19, 2 pm at The Garde celebration to yetwin, again what be is tabbedneeded by to theenthuse president his base, to set and up then the next goes government, after it – no quarter century.
    [Show full text]