DOCSLIB.ORG

For Immediate Release

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
For Immediate Release TheThe Hoffman Hoffman ResearchResearch Group TheTheTheTheA A Hoffman Division Hoffman DivisionHoffman Hoffman of of Gateway Gateway ResearchResearch Research CommunicationsResearchCommunications Group Inc.GroupGroup AA DivisionA DivisionA Division Division of of Gatewayof Gatewayof Gateway Gateway CommunicationsCommunications CommunicationsCommunications Inc. Inc.Inc. FORFORFOR IMMEDIATE IMMEDIATE IMMEDIATEIMMEDIATE RELEASE RELEASE ObamaObama Maintains Maintains Five Five Point Point AdvantageAdvantage Over RomneyRomney inin Oregon Oregon ObamaObama Maintains Maintains Five Five Point Point Advantage Advantage Over Over Romney Romney in in Oregon Oregon ObamaObamaOn Maintains Wednesday Maintains October Five Five 24Point thPointth and AdvantageThursday Advantage October Over Over 25, 2012,Romney Romney The Hoffman in in Oregon Oregon On Wednesday October 24th and Thursday October 25, 2012, The Hoffman On Tuesday April 26th and Wednesdayth April 27th, The Hoffman Research Group ResearchOn Tuesday Group April surveyed 26th aand cross Wednesday sectionth th of AprilOregon 27th, voters The to Hoffman ascertain Research voter preferences Group ResearchFromOn TuesdayOn Group ThursdayOn Wednesday Wednesday Aprilsurveyed September 26th October aOctober andcross 29th Wednesday 24 section th24 ththroughand and Thursdayof Thursday OregonApril Saturday 27th, October voters October October The to25, Hoffman 25,ascertain 2012, 1st, 2012, The The Research The voterHoffman Hoffman Hoffman preferences Group Research ResearchsurveyedOn OnGroup aWednesday cross Wednesday surveyed section October Octoberof a crossOregon 24 section24 Republicanand and Thursday of Thursday Oregon voters October votersOctober to ascertain to 25, ascertain25, 2012, 2012, their The Thepreferencesvoter Hoffman Hoffman preferences in the surveyedinResearchin theResearch the 2012 2012 a crossGroup Presidential GroupPresidential section surveyed surveyed ofelection. election. Oregona crossa cross section Republican section of ofOregon Oregon voters voters to voters ascertain to toascertain ascertain their voter preferences voter preferences preferences in the GroupResearchin2016Research the 2012Presidentialsurveyed Group GroupPresidential asurveyed cross Primarysurveyed section election. a Election. crossa cross of section Oregon section of voters ofOregon Oregon to ascertain voters voters to toascertaintheir ascertain preferences voter voter preferences inpreferences the 2016 2016inin thePresidential the 2012 2012 Presidential Presidential Primary election. Election. election. Presidentialinin the the 2012 The2012 PresidentialElection resulting Presidential and data election. their election.found position President on BarackOregon’s Obama Measure currently 97. leading Governor The resulting data found President Barack Obama currently leading Governor Mitt The RomneyThe surveyThe resulting resulting by is a based 47% data data toon found42% landlinefound margin. President President and cellphone Barack Barack Obama interviews Obama currently currently with 555leading leading randomly Governor Governor chosen MittThe RomneyThe surveyThe resulting resulting by is a based 47% data data toon found42% landlinefound margin. President President and cellphone Barack Barack Obama interviews Obama currently currently with 555leading leading randomly Governor Governor chosen likelyMittMittThe TheRomneyOregon surveyRomneyThe resulting resulting Republicanbyis by baseda 47% adata 47% data on to found toPrimary42% landlinefound 42% margin.President margin.President voters. and cellphone AttentionBarack Barack Obama interviews Obamawas given currently currently towith Oregon’s 605555leading leading randomly randomly rural Governor Governor and chosen chosen urban likelyMittMitt RomneyOregon RomneyWhen voters.Republicanby pushed, by a 47%a 47%Attention undecidedto toPrimary42% 42% margin.was margin. votersvoters. given broke toAttention Oregon’s toward was Mittrural given Romney and to urban Oregon’s almost divide 2rural to within 1. and sevenurban divideWhen within pushed, seven geographic undecided regions. voters broke The survey toward also Mitt maintained Romney almostappropriate 2 to balances1. geographicdivide withinWhenWhen regions. seven pushed, pushed, geographicThe undecided survey undecided alsoregions. voters maintainedvoters Thebroke broke survey toward appropriatetoward also Mitt Mittmaintained Romney balancesRomney almost appropriate almostwith 2regard to2 to1. balances1. to age, with regardWhenTheWhen random topushed, pushed,age, gender sample undecided undecided and of 615vote voters Oregon voters propensity. broke brokevoters toward toward surveyed Mitt Mitt 42% Romney Romney Democrats, almost almost 34%2 to2 to1. 1. genderwith regard TheWhenandWhen random voteto pushed, age, pushed,propensity. gender sample undecided undecided and of 615vote votersOregon propensity.voters broke brokevoters toward towardsurveyed Mitt Mitt 42% Romney Romney Democrats, almost almost 234% to2 to1. 1. RepublicansTheThe Therandom random andrandom 24% sample sample sampleUnaffiliated of of 615 of615 615 Oregon Oregon voters. Oregon voters votersThe voters statistical surveyedsurveyed surveyed margin 42% 42% Democrats,Democrats, ofDemocrats, error for 34% 34%this 34% survey RepublicansTheThe survey random and has24% sample a Unaffiliatedmargin of 615of error Oregon voters. of plus votersThe or statistical minus surveyed 4.16 margin 42% at a Democrats,95% of errorconfidence for 34% this level. survey RepublicansRepublicansis RepublicansplusThe orThe randomminus andrandom and and 24% 3.9%.24% sample 24% sampleUnaffiliated UnaffiliatedAttention Unaffiliated of of615 615 Oregonwas voters. voters.Oregon voters.given voters TheThe tovoters The Oregon’sstatisticalstatistical surveyedstatistical surveyed rural margin 42% margin 42% or Democrats, urban of ofDemocrats, of errorerror error divide for for for 34%this thisand 34%this survey survey survey Republicansis plusThe or survey minus and has 3.9%.24% a margin UnaffiliatedAttention of error was voters. ofgiven plus The to or Oregon’sstatistical minus 4%4.16 rural margin at at a ora 95% 95% urbanof errorconfidence confidence divide for this and level. level. survey Republicansis ismaintainedRepublicansplus isplus plus or or minus or minus and minus appropriate and 3.9%.24% 3.9%. 24% 3.9%. UnaffiliatedAttention AttentionUnaffiliated balancesAttention was was withvoters. was voters.given given regardgiven The to toThe toOregon’stoOregon’sstatistical Oregon’sstatisticalparty, gender rural margin rural margin oror and or urban urbanof urban age oferror error withindivide divide divide for for this and sevenand thisand survey survey maintainedHeadquartered appropriate in Portland, balances OR, with The regard Hoffman to party, Research gender Group, and age a division within sevenof Gateway ismaintained maintainedgeographicisplus maintainedplus or or minus minus appropriate regions. appropriate appropriate 3.9%. 3.9%. Attention balancesAttention balances balances was with with was with given regardgivenregard regard to to toOregon’sto Oregon’s toparty,party, party, gender rural gender rural or andand orandurban urbanageage age within withindivide within divide seven andseven sevenand geographicCommunicationsHeadquartered regions. Inc., in Portland, has conducted OR, The hundreds Hoffman of Researchpolitical tracking Group, surveysa division and of market Gateway maintainedgeographicgeographicmaintainedgeographic regions. appropriate regions. appropriate regions. balances balances with with regard regard to toparty, party, gender gender and and age age within within seven seven CommunicationsThe Hoffman Inc., Research has conducted Group, hundreds a division ofof politicalGateway trackingCommunications surveys and Inc. market has Communicationsgeographicresearchgeographic projects regions. regions. Inc.,since has 1984. conducted hundreds of political tracking surveys and market researchbeen Themeasuring Theprojects TheHoffman Hoffman Hoffman since the Research views Research 1984. Research and Group, Group,opinions Group, a a division divisionaof division Oregonians ofof ofGateway Gateway since Communications Communications1984. Communications Inc. Inc. Inc. has has has beenbeenbeen measuring Themeasuring Themeasuring Hoffman Hoffman the the theviews Research views Research views and and and Group,opinions opinions Group, opinions a divisiona ofof division ofOregoniansOregonians Oregonians of ofGateway Gateway since since Communications 1984.1984. Communications1984. Inc. Inc. has has beenbeen measuring measuring the the views views and and opinions opinions of ofOregonians Oregonians since since 1984. 1984. For moreFor information,more information, please please contact contact Tim Nashif, Tim Nashif CEO atof TheGateway Hoffman Communications, Research Inc. ForGroup moreForFor Fordirectlymore Forinformation,more more moreinformation, information,at information, 503-257-0100 information, please please503-257-0100 please contactplease please or contact email contact contact Timcontact [email protected] • TimNashif, [email protected] TimNashif Nashif CEONashif at at ofThe at TheGateway The .Hoffman HoffmanHoffman Hoffman Communications, Research Research Research Research Group Inc. 503-257-0100 • [email protected] GroupGroupGroup Fordirectly directlyFor moredirectly more at information,at 503-257-0100 information,at503-257-0100directly 503-257-0100 at503-257-0100 503-257-0100please please or or emailor email contact email contact [email protected]@gatewayci.com•
Load more

Recommended publications
  • City of Portland's Petition For
    2/7/2019 4:23 PM 19CV06544 1 2 3 4 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON 5 FOR THE COUNTY OF MULTNOMAH 6 In the Matter of: Case No. 7 Validation Proceeding to Determine the CITY OF PORTLAND’S PETITION FOR Legality of City of Portland Charter Chapter 3, COMMENCEMENT OF VALIDATION 8 Article 3 and Portland City Code Chapter 2.10 PROCEEDING UNDER ORS 33.710 AND Regulating Campaign Finance and Disclosure. 33.720 9 10 Exempt from Filing Fee Pursuant to ORS 20.140 11 12 Petitioner alleges as follows: 13 1. 14 The City of Portland (the “City”) is a municipal corporation for purposes of ORS 33.710 15 and 33.720. 16 2. 17 The Portland City Council (the “Council”) is the governing body of the City of Portland. 18 3. 19 The City seeks a judgment from this Court under ORS 33.710 as to the legality of the 20 City of Portland Home Rule Charter (the “Charter”) Chapter 3, Article 3 (the “Charter 21 Amendment”) and of Portland City Code Chapter 2.10 (the “Code Amendment”), enacted by 22 implementing Ordinance No. 189348 (the “Ordinance”). See ORS 33.710(2)(e-g); Exhibit 1 23 (Charter Chapter 3, Article 3); Exhibit 2 (Ordinance No. 189348 “Authorize changes to City 24 Code to implement Campaign Finance in Candidate Elections Charter amendment and request 25 initiation of validation action”), Exhibit 3 (Portland City Code Chapter 2.10). Specifically, the 26 Page 1 – CITY OF PORTLAND’S PETITION FOR COMMENCEMENT OF VALIDATION PROCEEDING UNDER ORS 33.710 AND 33.720 PORTLAND CITY ATTORNEY’S OFFICE 1221 SW 4TH AVENUE, RM.
    [Show full text]
  • Voters' Pamphlet General Election 2020 for Jackson County
    Voters’ Pamphlet Oregon General Election November 3, 2020 Certificate of Correctness I, Bev Clarno, Secretary of State of the State of Oregon, do hereby certify that this guide has been correctly prepared in accordance with the law in order to assist electors in voting at the General Election to be held throughout the State on November 3, 2020. Witness my hand and the Seal of the State of Oregon in Salem, Oregon, this 21st day of September, 2020. Bev Clarno Oregon Secretary of State Oregon votes by mail. Ballots will be mailed to registered voters beginning October 14. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE ELECTIONS DIVISION STEPHEN N. TROUT BEV CLARNO DIRECTOR SECRETARY OF STATE 255 CAPITOL ST NE, SUITE 501 SALEM, OREGON 97310 (503) 986-1518 Dear Oregon Voter, The information this Voters’ Pamphlet provides is designed to assist you in participating in the November 3, 2020, General Election. I know it is hard to know what information to trust with all the information and misinformation we experience in our lives today, especially during a presidential election. Yours is a difficult job to sort through it all to make an informed decision. And while I know it is hard, I know you can and will do it. We recognize that with unlimited sources of information it can be challenging to find informa- tion that is accurate and trustworthy. Fortunately, there are some simple questions you can ask yourself to help identify misinformation: 1) Is there any data or evidence presented to support the information? 2) Does this information seem designed to push my political buttons? 3) Is there something about this information that doesn’t seem right or too bizarre to be true? 4) Who is sharing this information? 5) Does this individual or group have an agenda? Be an informed voter and don’t believe everything you see or hear.
    [Show full text]
  • Advisory Opinion 2012-39
    FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Washington, DC 20463 January 31, 2012 CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED ADVISORY OPINION 2012-39 Audrey Clement, Ph.D. Co-Chair, Green Party of Virginia Green Party of Virginia P. O. Box 7316 Falls Church, VA 22040 Dear Ms. Clement: We are responding to your inquiry regarding the status of the Green Party of Virginia as a State committee of a political party under the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (the “Act”), and Commission regulations. The Commission concludes that the Green Party of Virginia is a State committee of a political party because: (1) the Green Party of the United States is a political party; (2) the Green Party of Virginia is part of the official structure of the Green Party of the United States; and (3) the Green Party of Virginia is responsible for the day-to-day operations of the Green Party of the United States at the State level. Background The facts presented in this advisory opinion are based on your letter received on December 14, 2012 and other publicly available information. The Green Party of Virginia is a political committee that is registered with, and reports to, the Commission. In 2001, a representative of the Green Party of Virginia executed on its behalf a document entitled, “Official Affiliation Agreement between the Green Party of Virginia and the Green Party of the United States” (“Affiliation Agreement”). In it, the Green Party of Virginia agreed to affiliate with, and abide by the bylaws of, the Green Party of the United States; to elect delegates from Virginia to represent it on the Coordinating Committee of the Green Party of the United States; to use its best efforts to support ballot access for national candidates nominated by the AO 2012-39 Page 2 Green Party of the United States; and to nominate candidates for State, local and Federal election.
    [Show full text]
  • October 1,2009 AO DRAFT COMMENT PROCEDURES The
    October 1,2009 AO DRAFT COMMENT PROCEDURES The Commission permits the submission of written public comments on draft advisory opinions when on the agenda for a Commission meeting. DRAFT ADVISORY OPINION 2009-24 is available for public comments under this procedure. It was requested by John Ailey, treasurer on behalf of the Illinois Green Party. Draft Advisory Opinion 2009-24 is scheduled to be on the Commission's agenda for its public meeting of Thursday, October 8, 2009. Please note the following requirements for submitting comments: 1) Comments must be submitted in writing to the Commission Secretary with a duplicate copy to the Office of General Counsel. Comments in legible and complete form may be submitted by fax machine to the Secretary at (202) 208-3333 and to OGC at (202) 219-3923. 2) The deadline for the submission of comments is 12:00pm noon (Eastern Time) on October 7, 2009. 3) No comments will be accepted or considered if received after the deadline. Late comments will be rejected and returned to the commenter. Requests to extend the comment period are discouraged and unwelcome. An extension request will be considered only if received before the comment deadline and then only on a case-by-case basis in special circumstances. 4) All timely received comments will be distributed to the Commission and the Office of General Counsel. They will also be made available to the public at the Commission's Public Records Office. CONTACTS Press inquiries: Judith Ingram (202)694-1220 Commission Secretary: Mary Dove (202) 694-1040 Other inquiries: To obtain copies of documents related to AO 2009-24, contact the Public Records Office at (202) 694-1120 or (800) 424-9530 or visit the Commission's website at www.fec.gov.
    [Show full text]
  • John Rensenbrink 2020
    number 40 winter/spring • 2020 first issue of volume xvii Newsstand $5ºº green horiZon Magazine .….….….… .….….….… AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL PUBLISHED BY THE GREEN HORIZON FOUNDATION a tribute to John Rensenbrink . table of contents The Green Horizon Team ............ 2 A Special Appeal The Primacy of Ecology ............. 3 STEVE WELZER John Rensenbrink’s Green praxis ...... 4 TONY AFFIGNE for a Special Issue A Fearless and Enthusiastic Educator .. 8 John Rensenbrink started Green Horizon just providing funding; they also request BARRY MILLS as a newsletter during the 1990s and then multiple copies of the magazine for Pathfinder Toward a expanded it into a notable international distribution to colleagues or for tabling Transformational Politics ............ 9 journal seventeen years ago. It’s now the at events. TED BECKER only major print magazine in the United A special way to honor John would be to States that features the coverage of Green sign up as a Sustainer. This would be an Friend, Mentor, Role Model. 10 CHARLES BROWN politics and the broad “greening” social- opportune time to do so because Green transformation movement. Horizon Foundation is making plans to John Played Key Role in Early US Green For the sake of maximum circulation branch out. We’re considering publishing Electoral Strategy ................. 13 we mail out copies to anyone who pamphlets and books, sponsoring conferences, MIKE FEINSTEIN requests to be on our Receivers List. In and hosting webinars. It would take Letter to the Green Parties that way it reaches some of the most additional resources for us to start reaching of the World ..................... 15 influential activists in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Voters' Pamphlet Candidates November 2008
    2of 2 Voters’ Pamphlet Candidates Oregon General Election November 4, 2008 Bill Bradbury Oregon Secretary of State This Voters’ Pamphlet is provided for assistance in casting your vote by mail ballot. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE ELECTIONS DIVISION BILL BRADBURY JOHN LINDBACK DIRECTOR SECRETARY OF STATE 255 CAPITOL ST NE, SUITE 501 JEAN STRAIGHT SALEM, OREGON 97310 DEPUTY SECRETARY OF STATE (503) 986-1518 My Fellow Oregonians: Once again, it’s time for Oregon voters to make good on the bargain we make for living in a free country. It’s time to vote. In these pages, you will see the candidates running for office this year. These are the words they’ve chosen to represent themselves to you. Read them carefully and evaluate what they have to say because the decisions made by our elected officials make a difference in our lives. Voting is only one of the duties we share in preserving our blessings of liberty. We serve on juries. We pay our taxes. We serve in the armed forces. We don’t litter. And we vote. Voting is no mere footnote to democracy. It’s what separates us from tyrants, a practice we’ve nurtured and encouraged for more than two centuries and preserve today as a bulwark in keeping our country safe and free. It’s already been an exciting year. In the spring, Oregon saw a huge surge in voter registration and we may well set new records in November for turnout. Registering, remember, is only half the process and doesn’t mean a lot unless you actually vote.
    [Show full text]
  • Voters' Pamphlet General Election 2020 for Multnomah County
    Voters’ Pamphlet Oregon General Election November 3, 2020 Certificate of Correctness I, Bev Clarno, Secretary of State of the State of Oregon, do hereby certify that this guide has been correctly prepared in accordance with the law in order to assist electors in voting at the General Election to be held throughout the State on November 3, 2020. Witness my hand and the Seal of the State of Oregon in Salem, Oregon, this 21st day of September, 2020. Bev Clarno Oregon Secretary of State Oregon votes by mail. Ballots will be mailed to registered voters beginning October 14. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE ELECTIONS DIVISION STEPHEN N. TROUT BEV CLARNO DIRECTOR SECRETARY OF STATE 255 CAPITOL ST NE, SUITE 501 SALEM, OREGON 97310 (503) 986-1518 Dear Oregon Voter, The information this Voters’ Pamphlet provides is designed to assist you in participating in the November 3, 2020, General Election. I know it is hard to know what information to trust with all the information and misinformation we experience in our lives today, especially during a presidential election. Yours is a difficult job to sort through it all to make an informed decision. And while I know it is hard, I know you can and will do it. We recognize that with unlimited sources of information it can be challenging to find informa- tion that is accurate and trustworthy. Fortunately, there are some simple questions you can ask yourself to help identify misinformation: 1) Is there any data or evidence presented to support the information? 2) Does this information seem designed to push my political buttons? 3) Is there something about this information that doesn’t seem right or too bizarre to be true? 4) Who is sharing this information? 5) Does this individual or group have an agenda? Be an informed voter and don’t believe everything you see or hear.
    [Show full text]
  • The Oregonian Portland City Officials Ask for More Police Positions
    The Oregonian Portland City Officials Ask for More Police Positions, Money For Renter Services, Less Graffiti Spending By Jessica Floum January 31, 2018 In the run-up to creating the city of Portland’s budget for the coming year, officials from the city’s 27 bureaus submitted budget requests Monday that spell out positions, programs and equipment they would like to add. They also proposed cuts to their departments’ spending to comply with Mayor Ted Wheeler's directive to name which 5 percent they would put on the chopping block for fiscal year 2018- 2019 in anticipation of a deficit. Scroll down to read about some of this year’s asks and proposed cuts. Housing Bureau Commissioner in charge: Wheeler The Housing Bureau, whose profile has risen amid the housing crisis, asked for $800,000 a year to run a new Office of Renter Services. The mayor promised during his campaign to create an office to help mediate disputes between landlords and tenants, but not much has materialized, aside from a name change for what used to be the Office of Landlord-Tenant Affairs. Bureau officials also asked for $1.2 million in one-time funding to pay for culturally- and language-specific outreach to inform Portland renters of all backgrounds and languages of the renter protection rule the council adopted in February 2017. According to the budget request many renters of color are unaware of the rule, which requires landlords to pay $2,900 to $4,500 to renters they evict without cause or who must move as a result of a rent increase of 10 percent or more.
    [Show full text]
  • Eihibitll United Progreuivei for Victory Pren and Media
    NH fl O O O Eihibitll United Progreuivei for Victory Pren and Media. Homt * Who We Are ' Get Involved ' Get Informed ' Press & Media Media Contecte Press contact PRESSQUPF un AIAMC. K1 ORGANIZATION: DM PHONE: SubmaOmry j RepofleShwlle^ O AaPiQgreaaheaPaaartllBClBr.Riglftttnip October 28,2004 WASHINGTON - Ralph Nader has received mom ttwi $125,000 from GOP dorwrs and consultants Jr^^ Veterans for Truth a larger figure than previously reported, United Progressives for Victory said today. UPfofVtatory.com's teteat research draws on press lapoito art Fadanri Electim CommMm tuiKflxibutMmeoe by the GOP in drculaUng arid defending Nao^ • 8wHI Boat Vaterana far Nader? Eight donors to trie Wanwjs Swift Boat Vtetenvm tor Truth 527, who have given $3^ Kenya military service, neve ateo given Nader $11.250. [FEC] • rao^^nu. Corporate SuppOftFto of the lafgertd targeted moderate RapuHcana, have given $7,500 to Nadar. They nave grven $450,000 to trie Club for Growth in the past I cydes. Seven contributors to tr*Pro-Giow» Action Teem, sr^^ [FEC] i Stave Werk raised $30.000 for Choices for America, a group that paid for aignatui Neder^ ballot effort in Nevada. [Las Vegas Review Journal, B/2&VD4] m New Hampshire, Republican consultant David Carney, htov^ ami his bustoessassm to Nader to cover the coat of petition gathering that Can»*MHBtedonNadartbarwlf.TI^ in George H.W. Bush's White House, responsible for 3 out of every 6 o^tara that ntedarraiaad in tnaGianlte State. In MUfgan, lha Rapubiein party made a S3.4W iri« baaot them after the RapubVcane turned in 46,000 signatures foe Wm end vi^ent to court for him.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon Public Broadcasting October Statewide Survey
    October 2016 Oregon Public Broadcasting October Statewide Survey Crosstabs Prepared by DHM Research 503.220.0575 239 NW 13th Ave #205 Portland, OR 97209 www.dhmresearch.com 1 Oregon Public Broadcasting October Statewide Survey October 6-13, 2016; N=600 How to Read Crosstables: In the example chart (left), rows represent the three possible response options to the question “All in all, do you think things are headed in the right direction, or are things pretty much on the wrong track?” The three response options are: “right direction,” “wrong track,” and “don’t know.” The amounts in each response category sum to the amount in the “total” row at the top of the table. The first column, or banner, is the “Total” column. It reflects the overall results. The next two columns reflect the results of a subgroup, “Gender.” The gender subgroup is composed of Males and Females, each with their own column. Both gender groups are assigned a letter (Male=B, Female=C). These two columns show how male’s attitudes compare to female’s attitudes. As shown in the chart, 69% of the full sample thinks things are headed in the right direction. Looking at the gender subgroup, 71% of women think things are headed in the right direction, compared to 66% of males. Statistically Significant Differences: If a pair of cells has a difference which is statistically significant, the larger of the two cells is flagged with the letter of the opposite column. The test shows the difference in female’s attitudes about things being headed in the right direction is statistically significantly different than those of male’s, which is signified by a “B” (the letter given to Males) next to female’s results for “right direction.” The footnote indicates the level of significance (sig=.05).
    [Show full text]
  • Election: Biden Pushes Closer to Victory
    e SUNNYEdition 67 • 44 | THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2020 | theworldlink.com Follow us online: facebook.com/theworldnewspaper twitter.com/TheWorldLink instagram.com/theworldlink Election: Biden pushes closer to victory WASHINGTON (AP) — dle. To reach 270, he needed to Election Day “will not be count- Georgia, Pennsylvania, Nevada struck a chord with white work- Democrat Joe Biden was pushing claim all four remaining battle- ed,” a move that if implemented and North Carolina were tight ing-class voters and he captured closer to the 270 Electoral grounds: Pennsylvania, North would affect military ballots, as with votes still being tabulated. all three in 2016 by a combined College votes needed to carry the Carolina, Georgia and Nevada. his campaign propagated base- The Trump campaign said total of just 77,000 votes. White House, securing victories With millions of votes yet to less allegations of fraud. it was confident the president The candidates waged a fierce in the “blue wall” battlegrounds be tabulated, Biden already had Elections are run by indi- would ultimately pull out a fight for the states this year, of Wisconsin and Michigan and received more than 71 million vidual state, county and local victory in Arizona, where votes with Biden’s everyman political narrowing President Donald votes, the most in history. At governments and Trump’s public were also still being counted, in- persona resonating in blue-col- Trump’s path. an afternoon news conference comments have no impact on cluding in Maricopa County, the lar towns while his campaign With just a handful of states Wednesday, the former vice the tallying of votes across the state’s most populous area.
    [Show full text]
  • AGENDA 1Tell SUBMITTED LATE
    AGENDA DOCUMENT NO. 08-25 .. ; c. ;'/ ,_, .,' . L",·/.L ELECT!' . C'JMMISSION U , SECRETARIAT Z008 SEP 2'1 P ): 2q FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION Washington, DC 20463 September 29, 2008 AGENDA 1tELl MEMORANDUM For Meeting 81;../ [) -. .. ~~ f.~:~ TO: The Commission SUBMITTED LATE FROM: Thomasenia P. Dunca~1) General Counsel Rosemary C. Smithee} Associate General Counsel Robert M. Knop nAAA ~ Assistant General ~~~~;el Joshua S. Blume JS{3 Attorney Subject: Draft AO 2008-13 Attached is a proposed draft of the subject advisory opinion. We request that this draft be placed on the agenda for October 2, 2008. Attachment 1 ADVISORY OPINION 2008-13 2 3 Mr. Patrick Driscoll DRAFT 4 Treasurer 5 Pacific Green Party ofOregon 6 454 Willamette Street 7 Eugene, OR 97401 8 9 Dear Mr. Driscoll: 10 11 We are responding to your advisory opinion request regarding the status ofthe 12 Pacific Green Party of Oregon (the "PGPO"), as a State party committee of a political 13 party under the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended (the "Act"), and 14 Commission regulations. The Commission concludes that the PGPO qualifies as a State 15 party committee because: (1) the Green Party ofthe United States (the "GPUS") qualifies 16 as a political party; (2) the PGPO is part ofthe official GPUS structure; and (3) the PGPO 17 is responsible for the day-to-day operation ofthe GPUS at the State level. 18 Background 19 The facts presented in this advisory opinion are based on your letter received on 20 August 25, 2008, an e-mail received from the PGPO dated September 2, 2008, an e-mail 21 from the GPUS dated September 8, 2008, telephone conversations with Commission 22 attorneys, and publicly available information on the Commission's and other websites.
    [Show full text]