Skeena River Showing the Known Dis• Tribution of Rocky Mountain ( ) and Eastern Whitefish (#) 7 Fig

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Skeena River Showing the Known Dis• Tribution of Rocky Mountain ( ) and Eastern Whitefish (#) 7 Fig 6,1,-tSn A STUDY OF LIMNOLOGICAL CONDITIONS OF SKEENA LAKES AS THEY AFFECT THE DISTRIBUTION AND ABUNDANCE OF THE 1HITEFISHES COREGONUS AND PROSOPIUM By Harold Godfrey A Thesis submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of ZOOLOGY THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA April, 1949. ii ABSTRACT Limnological conditions in lakes of the Skeena drainage, British Columbia,have been examined to asoertain what factors may be restricting the distribution and/or abundance of the Eastern and Rooky Mountain whitefishes. The Eastern whitefish is known to be in only four Skeena lakes, and the Rooky. Mountain whitefish in all Skeena lakes which have been investigated. It is probable that the Eastern whitefish has not entered other Skeena lakes because the lake conditions are not suitable for its establishment. Such conditions are mainly warm waters, shallow depths, and small area; and are sometimes the heavy silting of the water, and the resultant poor food supply. It is not numerous in any of the four lakes, probably because of the relative poor abundance of bottom food organisms, particularly in the absence of such organisms as the amphipod Ppntoporeia. Conditions are apparently most favourable for Eastern whitefish in oligotrophia lakes. Rocky Mountain whitefish appear to favour eutrophic lakes, and are most abundant in lakes where a good supply of bottom food is assured by the absence of such potential competitors as the Peamouth chub and Squawfish. There is no evidence of any heavy predation on either of the two whitefish. It is improbable that any physioal barrier has limited the distribution of these fish. • • • * ooo .•.• TABLE OF CONTENTS» Page. Abstract ii Introduction 1 Acknowledgements 2 Systematic Position 3 Distribution in North America 4 The Skeena Drainage 6 Distribution of Eastern and Rocky Mountain IShitefish 8 Climate 13 Geology of the Skeena Lakes 16 Morphometrical and Physioo-Chemioal Characteristics .... 20 Introduction 20 Materials and methods 20 Lakelse lake 22 Babine lake 28 Morrison lake 33 Other lakes 37 Summary and significance 38 The Bathymetric Distribution of Eastern and Rocky Mountain TOiitefish 45 Introduction 45 Treatment of netting data ....... 46 Distribution of Rocky Mountain whitefish in Lakelse lake 49 Distribution of Rooky Mountain whitefish in Babine lake 52 Distribution of Eastern whitefish in Babine lake 55 Catoh of both species in different Positions in Babine lake 58 Distribution of Eastern whitefish in Morrison lake 62 Summary and comparisons 65 The Pood of the Whitefishes 68 Materials and methods 66 Food of Rocky Mountain whitefish in Lakelse lake 69 Food of Rocky Mountain whitefish in Babine lake 74 Food of Rocky Mountain whitefish in Morrison lake 78 Discussion 80 Food of Eastern whitefish in Babine lake ....... 81 Food of Eastern whitefish in Morrison lake ...... 84 Discussion 86 Summary 88 Bottom Fauna 91 The bottom fauna of Lakelse lake 91 Introduction • 91 Methods and materials 91 Results 94 TABLE OF CONTENTS. Cont'd. Page_. Characteristics of the distribution of six major groups 94 Abundanoe of bottom fauna in relation to distance from shore 100 Further considerations on the distribution of bottom fauna 102 The bottom fauna of Babine lake 104 The bottom fauna of Morrison lake 107 Comparison with other lakes 108 The Food of the Whitefishes in Relation to Supply 112 Lakelse lake 112 A Note on Mysis 115 Competitors for Food of Whitefish 117 Introduction 117 Materials and methods 118 Peamouth chub . 119 Squawfish 125 Cutthroat trout 131 Dolly Varden char 140 Northern and Common suckers ....... 140 Summary 148 Predation on Eastern and Rooky Mountain whitefish 150 Introduction 150 Cutthroat trout 151 Squawfish 153 Dolly Varden char . 154 Lake Trout 154 Rainbow trout 154 Burbot V 157 Discussion 157 Growth Rates 161 Growth of the Eastern whitefish in Babine and Morrison lakes 161 Growth of the Rooky Mountain whitefish in Lakelse and Babine 163 Comparisons of Body Proportions . 165 Factors Limiting Distribution 167 Rocky Mountain whitefish 167 Eastern whitefish ... 167 Summary • 174 Factors Limiting Abundanoe 175 Rocky Mountain whitefish 175 Eastern whitefish 180 TABLE OF CONTENTS. Cont'd. Page. Summary and. Conclusions ... 186 Literature oited • 193 Appendix 197 .•.. OOO •.•• LIST OF FIGURES. Page. Fig. 1. Map of the Skeena river showing the known dis• tribution of Rocky Mountain ( ) and Eastern whitefish (#) 7 Fig. 2. Average monthly precipitation and air temperatures at various points within the Skeena drainage ... 14 Fig. 3. Map of Lakelee lake showing bottom contour lines and dredging lines 23 Fig. 4. Water temperatures of Lakelse lake, 1946 - 1948 25 Fig. 5. Map of Babine lake showing bottom contour lines 29, Fig. 6. Water temperatures of Babine lake, Divisions II and III, 1946 31 Fig. 7. Map of Morrison lake showing bottom contour lines 34 Fig. 8. Catch per net-night per mesh of Rooky Mountain whitefish at different depths in Lakelse lake. Data of 1946 and 1947 oombined 51 Fig. 9. Catch per net-night per mesh of Rocky Mountain whitefish at different depths in Babine lake. Data of Divisions I and II for 1946 and 1947 combined 54 Fig. 10. Catch per net-night per mesh of Eastern whitefish at different depths in Babine lake. Data of Divisions I and II for 1946 and 1947 oombined 57 Fig. 11. Catch per net-night per mesh of Eastern whitefish at different depths in Morrison lake. Data of 1946 and 1947 oombined . 64 Fig. 12. The relative abundance of six major groups of bottom organisms at different depths in Lakelse lake, 1946 97 Fig. 13. The distribution of the Ephemerida, the Chironomidae and the Gastropoda in Lakelse lake, 1945 99 Fig. 14. The distribution of the Peleoypoda, the Trichoptera, and the Amphipoda in Lakelse lake, 1945 101 Fig. 15. The relative abundance of bottom fauna in Lakelse lake at different distances from shore, and showing the average depths of such distances, 1945 103 Fig. 16. Catch per net-night per mesh of Cutthroat trout, Squawfish and Peamouth ohub at different depths in Lakelse lake. Data of 1946 and 1947 oombined 123 Fig. 17. View of Lakelse lake from the east shore. Lakelse river a little right of oentre. 198 Fig. 18. Aerial view of Lakelse lake and Lakelse river. 198 Fig. 19. Aerial view of Babine lake. The north-west arm in the background ..... ..... 199 Fig. 20. View of Babine lake. Looking towards Old Fort 199 ..•. ooo .•*. INTRODUCTION. Sinoe 1944 the Pacific Biologioal Station has conducted investigations concerned -with the Skeena river salmon populations. It has long been rea• lized that the mortality of young salmon is particularly high during their lacustrine phase, and the investigators, therefore, have direoted considerable effort and attention towards the conditions obtaining in the Skeena's lakes and streams. This has made possible the collection of muoh_data and Z .material pertaining to other freshwater fishes, and in particular, has provided for this present study of the whitefishes of the Skeena drainage. Sinoe, however, the whitefishes were not of especial importance to the salmon investigations, there are many occasions in which the data necessary for their thorough study are meagre or lacking. The two whitefishes present in the Skeena are the Common or Eastern whitefish, Coregonus clupeaformis (Mitohill), and the Rooky Mountain white- fish, Prosopium williamsoni (Girard). The Common whitefish is apparently limited in its distribution to only four of the Skeena lakes; the Rocky Mountain whitefish on the other hand is of universal occurrence throughout the drainage, though in places it is not particularly abundant. The present problem has been to determine what faotors may be limiting the abundance and distribution of the two whitefishes in certain of the Skeena lakes. This has been approached by examining the available material and data pertinent to the identification and distribution of the two speoieB throughout the drainage, and by defining their ecological dis• tribution, food and relative abundance of food, competition for food, predation, and the physical, ohemioal and biological conditions obtained in the waters they inhabit. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS. Dr. R. E. Foerster, Director of the Paoifio Biological Station at Nanaimo, and Dr. A. L. Pritchard, until recently in oharge of the Skeena salmon investigations, and now Director of Fish Culture Development at Ontario, have generously permitted the use of the material and data neoessary for the preparation of this paper. The writer would like to thank Dr. W. A. Clemens, Dr. P. A. Larkin and Dr. W. S, Hoar of the Department of Zoology of this University for their kind assistance and for helpful critioism of these efforts. Mr. J. A. McConneH of the staff of the Pacific Biological Station made many of the fish stomach analyses used here, and has frequently been of great help in collecting various data. The writer is pleased to acknowledge the generous help of his fellow field workers. While in attendance at this University during the past year, the writer has received a Bursary from the National Researoh Counoil of Canada, and he would like to take this opportunity to express his thanks to the Council. •... ooo •••. 3 SYSTEMATIC POSITION. Th» family Salmonidae were formerly divided into two sub-families, the Salmoninae and the Coregoninae. Recent American practice reoognizes the two distinct families Salmonidae (salmon and trout) and Coregonidae (white- fish and lake herring). Regan and most other European ichthyologists included within the genus Cpregonus all the known species of whitefish and lake herring. Jordan and Evermann(l91l), however, have given generic or sub-generic status to several minor groups of species, placing the whitefishes in the genus Cpregonus, under the subgenera Cpregonus and Prosopium. Koelz (1927) recognizes the three groups Leuoichthys, Cpregonus and Proaopium as distinot genera, and disregards the sub-genera of Jordan and Evermann.
Recommended publications
  • Pacific Northwest LNG Project
    Pacific NorthWest LNG Project Environmental Assessment Report September 2016 Cover photo credited to Pacific NorthWest LNG Ltd. © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of Environment and Climate Change Catalogue No: En106-136/2015E-PDF ISBN: 978-1-100-25630-6 This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part for non-commercial purposes, and in any format, without charge or further permission. Unless otherwise specified, you may not reproduce materials, in whole or in part, for the purpose of commercial redistribution without prior written permission from the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0H3 or info@ceaa- acee.gc.ca This document has been issued in French under the title: Projet de gaz naturel liquéfié Pacific NorthWest - Rapport d’évaluation environnementale Executive Summary Pacific NorthWest LNG Limited Partnership (the proponent) is proposing the construction, operation, and decommissioning of a new facility for the liquefaction, storage, and export of liquefied natural gas (LNG). The Pacific NorthWest LNG Project (the Project) is proposed to be located primarily on federal lands and waters administered by the Prince Rupert Port Authority approximately 15 kilometres south of Prince Rupert, British Columbia. At full production, the facility would receive approximately 3.2 billion standard cubic feet per day, or 9.1 x 107 cubic metres per day, of pipeline grade natural gas, and produce up to 20.5 million tonnes per annum of LNG for over 30 years. The Project would include the construction and operation of a marine terminal for loading LNG on to vessels for export to Pacific Rim markets in Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • Collections of DNA Baseline Tissues from Chinook Salmon in the North Coast of British Columbia in 2004
    Collections of DNA baseline tissues from Chinook Salmon in the North Coast of British Columbia in 2004 Ivan Winther Fisheries & Oceans Canada Science Branch, Pacific Region 417-2nd Avenue West Prince Rupert, British Columbia V8J-1G8 February, 2005 A project funded by the Northern Boundary and Transboundary Rivers Restoration and Enhancement Fund 2004. ii CONTENTS Abstract..........................................................................................................................................iii List of Tables .................................................................................................................................iii List of Figures................................................................................................................................iii Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 1 Methods........................................................................................................................................... 2 Results............................................................................................................................................. 2 Discussion....................................................................................................................................... 3 Acknowledgements......................................................................................................................... 3 References......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Department Of· Fisheries of Canada Vancouver, B. C
    DEPARTMENT OF· FISHERIES OF CANADA VANCOUVER, B. C. 1968 This booklet lists the names and shows the locat·ions of all main stem salmon spawning streams in British Columbia, exclusive of those streams draining through Southeastern Alaska. Not all tributary streams have been included in the listing. I I This material represents a portion of the information being . ' collected for the preparation of an inventory of salmon bearing streams in the Pacific Region. PREPARED BY RESOURCE DEVELOPMENT BRANCH IN COLLABORATION ·WITH CONSERVATION & PROTECTION BRANCH Edited by C. E. Walker DEPARTMENT OF FISHERIES OF CANADA PACIFIC AREA MAP SHOWING PROTECTION DISTRICTS AND STATISTICAL ,l\.REAS '- ·-" " . ~--L~-t--?.>~1> ,j '\ "·, -;:.~ '-, ~ .., -" '.) \ 'Uppe_r Arrow Loire \ ) \ ' ('ZC:t;I ;-Koafenoy ;:Lower (!~ LoJ<e Cranb~~"\ \Arrow ',\ ·• ·~ ·\. 1 i 1.AP NU. P. DIS1 • STA'rI3TICAL lAREAS LOCA'rION ..... ··-· ..... -~ ...... ... ~- ............... .. - . ................. ~ .. - ····-·~ --· ·---' --~ .. -'•··--·--·---- .. ·--""'· .. ..._..-~ ...-- ....... ..~---·-··-.-·- ... ---·· l 1 Sub-~District Cari boo ') 1 Sub-District Prince GeorGe ') .) 1 3ub-·-DJ.strict Kamloops.--Lj_llooet· 2 ~issioti-Harrison: Chilli.'wa ck--HoyJe Lower Fraser River ~~ 28 & 29 Howe Sound: New Jestminster 6 3 17, 18, 19 & 20 Nanaimo, Duncan, Victoria c.: 'Port San Juan 7 3 l~· Comox 8 3 15 Toba Inlet (~estview) () ,/ 3 16 Pender Harbour 10 Li- 22 & 23 Nitinat & Barkley Sound 11 Li- 24 Clayoquot Sound 12 l+ 25 Nootka Sound 13 l+ 26 Kyuquot Sound 14 5 J.l Seymour - Belize 15 5 12 Alert Bay (Broughton) 16 5 12 Alert Bay (Knight Inlet) , 1 ..... 17 5 --J Campbell River .., () ..L ~) 5 27 Quatsino Sound 6 9 &·10 Rivers Inlet & Smith Inlet ,..., ,.. 20 ( 0 Butedale (Fraser I\each) 21 '7 6 Butedale (Ki tima t Ar::.1) ') ') l.-t·- '7 7 Bella Bella r'"J ( 8 Bella Coola 8 3 Nass ..
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Limiting Juvenile Sockeye Production and Enhancement Potential for Selected B.C
    Fisheries and Oceans Pêches et Océans Science Sciences C S A S S C C S Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Secrétariat canadien de consultation scientifique Research Document 2001/098 Document de recherche 2001/098 Not to be cited without Ne pas citer sans permission of the authors 1 autorisation des auteurs 1 FACTORS LIMITING JUVENILE SOCKEYE PRODUCTION AND ENHANCEMENT POTENTIAL FOR SELECTED B.C. NURSERY LAKES K.S. Shortreed, K.F. Morton, K. Malange, and J.M.B. Hume Fisheries and Oceans Canada Marine Environment and Habitat Science Division 4222 Columbia Valley Highway Cultus Lake Laboratory, Cultus Lake, B.C. V2R 5B6 1 This series documents the scientific basis for 1 La présente série documente les bases the evaluation of fisheries resources in scientifiques des évaluations des ressources Canada. As such, it addresses the issues of halieutiques du Canada. Elle traite des the day in the time frames required and the problèmes courants selon les échéanciers documents it contains are not intended as dictés. Les documents qu’elle contient ne definitive statements on the subjects doivent pas être considérés comme des addressed but rather as progress reports on énoncés définitifs sur les sujets traités, mais ongoing investigations. plutôt comme des rapports d’étape sur les études en cours. Research documents are produced in the Les documents de recherche sont publiés dans official language in which they are provided to la langue officielle utilisée dans le manuscrit the Secretariat. envoyé au Secrétariat. This document is available on the Internet at: Ce document est disponible sur l’Internet à: http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/csas/ ISSN 1480-4883 Ottawa, 2001 ABSTRACT In this report we present summaries of our current knowledge of freshwater factors limiting sockeye production from 60 B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Minister of Mines PROVINCE of BRITISH COLUMBIA
    Minister of Mines PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA ANNUAL REPORT For the Year ended Rlst December 1947 BRITISH COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF MINES VICTORIA, B.C. Hon. R. C. MACDONALD, Minister. JOHN F. WALKER, Deputy Minister. JAMES STRANG, Chief Inspector of Mines. G. CAVE-BROWNE-CAVE, Chief Analyst and Assayer. HARTLEY %GGxNT, Chief MinEng Engineer. P. J. MULCAHY, Chief Gold Commissioner. To His Honour CHARLES ARTHUR BANKS, C.M.G., Liezctenant-Governor of the Provilce of British Columbia. MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOUR: The Annual Report of the Mining Industry of the Province for the year 194’7 is herewith respectfully submitted. R. C. MACDONALD, Minister of Mims. Minister of Mines Off&, June, 1948. A6 REPORT OF THE MINI,STER OF MINES, 1947. ILLUSTRATIONS, PHOTOGRAPHS. (After page 52.) I.-A. West side of Asitka Valley, showing cirques and horns. B. Diamond-drill camp, No. 3 level, Rambler mine. IL-A. Emerald mill, near Salmo. B. Atkinson dredge near Princeton. 111.-A. Plant of Clayburn Co., Ltd. B. Richmix Clay Co., fireclay mine at Kilgard. IV.-A. Dozer-loader excavating clay near Grand Forks. B. Power-shovel loading coal at Michel. ANNUAL REPORT OF THE MINISTER OF MINES, 1947. Review of the Mining Industry. By Hartley Sargent. The value of British Columbia mineral production in 1947 was more than $113,000,000, a record which far exceeds the value of production in any preceding year. Many factors contributed toward the record value, but by far the most impor- tant was the high price for most products. The price of gold we.9 lower than for any year since 1937, the price of silver, although high, was somewhat lower than the 1946 price, but the price for copper was the highest for any year since 1918, the price for lead exceeded substantially the price in any preceding year, and the price for zinc was much higher than for any year except 1915 and 1916.
    [Show full text]
  • Botanical and Physiographic Reconnaissance of Northern British Columbia
    Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biological Series Volume 14 Number 4 Article 1 9-1971 Botanical and physiographic reconnaissance of northern British Columbia Stanley L. Welsh Department of Botany, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84601 J. Keith Rigby Department of Geology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah 84601 Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byuscib Part of the Anatomy Commons, Botany Commons, Physiology Commons, and the Zoology Commons Recommended Citation Welsh, Stanley L. and Rigby, J. Keith (1971) "Botanical and physiographic reconnaissance of northern British Columbia," Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biological Series: Vol. 14 : No. 4 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byuscib/vol14/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biological Series by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. r?. J Brigham Young University haivm u .UJMlVERSiTvirj Science Bulletin BOTANICAL AND PHYSIOGRAPHIC RECONNAISSANCE OF NORTHERN BRITISH COLUMBIA by Stanley L. Welsh and J. Keith Rigby BIOLOGICAL SERIES — VOLUME XIV, NUMBER 4 SEPTEMBER 1971 BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY SCIENCE BULLETIN BIOLOGICAL SERIES Editor: Stanley L. Welsh, Department of Botany, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah Members of the Editorial Board: Vernon J. Tipton, Zoology Ferron L. Anderson, Zoology Joseph R. Murdock. Botany Wilmer W. Tanner, Zoology Ex officio Members: A. Lester Allen, Dean, College of Biological and Agricultural Sciences Ernest L. Olson, Chairman, University Publications The Brigham Young University Science Bulletin, Biological Series, publishes acceptable papers, particularly large manuscripts, on all phases of biology.
    [Show full text]
  • Conserving Skeena Fish Populations and Their Habitat 2002
    Conserving Skeena Fish Populations and their Habitat Allen S. Gottesfeld, Ken A. Rabnett, and Peter E. Hall November, 2002 Skeena Fisheries Commission Box 229, Hazelton, BC 250 842-5670 © Skeena Fisheries Commission 2002 The authors’ opinions do not necessarily reflect the policies of the Skeena Fisheries Commission. Comments, corrections, omissions, and information updates are welcome and may be forwarded to the authors. Cover: Coho at Stephens Creek, Kispiox Watershed September 2001. Photo Credit: A. S. Gottesfeld Back Cover: Skeena Watershed Map, Scale 1:2,000,000 Cartography by Gordon Wilson, Gitxsan Watershed A uthorities GIS Dept. Skeena Stage I Watershed-based Fish Sustainability Plan Conserving Skeena Fish Populations and Their Habitat Allen S. Gottesfeld, Ken A. Rabnett, and Peter E. Hall Skeena Fisheries Commission Table of Contents Abstract...................................................................................................................1 The Skeena WFSP Process.....................................................................................2 Context................................................................................................................2 Scope.......................................................................................................................3 Skeena WFSP Planning Process.............................................................................4 Stage I: Establishing Skeena Watershed Priorities.................................................5 Biophysical Profile:
    [Show full text]
  • Landforms of British Columbia 1976
    Landforms of British Columbia A Physiographic Outline bY Bulletin 48 Stuart S. Holland 1976 FOREWORD British Columbia has more variety in its climate and scenery than any other Province of Canada. The mildness and wetness of the southern coast is in sharp contrast with the extreme dryness of the desert areas in the interior and the harshness of subarctic conditions in the northernmost parts. Moreover, in every part, climate and vegetation vary with altitude and to a lesser extent with configuration of the land. Although the Province includes almost a thousand-mile length of one of the world’s greatest mountain chains, that which borders the north Pacitic Ocean, it is not all mountainous but contains a variety of lowlands and intermontane areas. Because of the abundance of mountains, and because of its short history of settlement, a good deal of British Columbia is almost uninhabited and almost unknown. However, the concept of accessibility has changed profoundly in the past 20 years, owing largely to the use of aircraft and particularly the helicopter. There is now complete coverage by air photography, and by far the largest part of the Province has been mapped topographically and geologically. In the same period of time the highways have been very greatly improved, and the secondary roads are much more numerous. The averagecitizen is much more aware of his Province, but, although knowledge has greatly improved with access,many misconceptions remain on the part of the general public as to the precise meaning even of such names as Cascade Mountains, Fraser Plateau, and many others.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology, Exploration and Mining Inbritish Columbia 1974
    Geology, Exploration and Mining inBritish Columbia 1974 British Columbia Department of Mines and Petroleum Resources DECEMBER, 1975. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1 INTRODUCTION ....... 5 2 METALMINES ............................................ 11 Contents ........................................... 11 General Review of Exploration and Metal Mining ............ 14 Reports on Metal Mines ................................ 27 3 PLACER .................................................. 357 Contents ........................................... 357 General Review of Placer Mining ......................... 357 Reportson Placer Operations ............................ 358 4 STRUCTURALMATERIALS AND INDUSTRIAL MINERALS ...... 369 Contents ........................................... 369 General Review of Structural Materials and Industrial Minerals . 370 Reworts on Commodities ............................... 370 5 COAL .................................................... 405 Contents ........................................... 405 General Review of Coal Mining and Exploration ............. 406 Reportson Coal Mines ................................. 411 3 INTRODUCTION PREFACE The first Minister of Mines of the Province of British Columbia was appointed in 1874. One of his responsibilities was “the duty of collecting information on the subject of the mining industries of the Province.” This material, which consisted of reports by the Gold Commissioners and Mining Recorders ofthe Province, was published inthe Annual Report of the Minister of Mines. A Bureau of
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Skeena Fish Passage Culvert Inspection
    Upper Skeena Fish Passage Culvert Inspection Ken Rabnett & Tim Wilson Gitksan Watershed Authorities February 2008 Upper Skeena Fish Passage Culvert Inspections 2 Gitksan Watershed Authorities February 2008 Upper Skeena Fish Passage Culvert Inspections Summary The purpose of this report is to present background information and survey results for fish passage inspections along the B.C. Rail grade located in the upper Skeena Watershed. In 2007, Gitksan Watershed Authorities (GWA) was retained by the Pacific Salmon Commission to conduct a Fish Passage and Culvert Inspection (FPCI) on all non-bridged B.C. Rail crossings of fish bearing streams in the upper Skeena Watershed. The upper Skeena Watershed fish passage assessment is the final component of a regional effort to improve fish passage limited by highways, secondary roads, and railway grades throughout high and very high value fish habitat in the Skeena Basin. This fish passage inspection project focused on the BC Rail grade, which enters the Skeena Watershed a few kilometres south of Bear Lake, traverses Bear Lake and River, passes Sustut River on the north bank, and goes upstream on the Skeena River northbank passing into the Stikine drainage. The B.C. Rail grade is 195 km in length within the Skeena Watershed. The primary objective of this project was to focus on increasing the abundance of fish stocks by opening freshwater habitat to salmon spawning and rearing. This project utilized the fish passage culvert inspection procedure developed to evaluate one of the most easily addressed fish habitat constraints: access to existing habitat. The methodology is based on the BC Government fish passage protocol outlined in Fish Passage – Culvert Inspection Procedures.
    [Show full text]
  • Coupled Via Continuous
    S1 Text – Stable Isotope Analysis δ13C and δ15N were measured with an elemental analyzer (EA) coupled via continuous flow to an isotope ratio mass spectrometer (CF-IRMS) at The University of British Columbia (UBC) (Vancouver, BC) and at Trent University (TU) (Peterborough, ON). A Vario MICRO cube EA coupled to an Isoprime IRMS (Elementar, Hanover, Germany) was used at UBC and n EA 300 (Eurovector, Pavia, Italy) coupled to a Horizon IRMS (Nu Instruments, Wrexham, UK) was used at TU. Isotopic measurements were calibrated relative to VPDB (δ13C) and AIR (δ15N) using USGS40 and USGS41 (Qi, et al. 2003) or USGS41a (Qi, et al. 2016) (Table 1). Internal check standards (Table 1) with known long-term averages were used to monitor analytical accuracy. Table 2 shows the standard deviations (1σ) and number of analyses for calibration standards for each analytical session. Table 3 shows mean and standard deviation (1σ) of δ13C and δ15N for check standards for all analytical sessions. Analytical 13 15 uncertainty was calculated following (Szpak, et al. 2017). For δ C and δ N random errors (uR(w)) was 13 15 calculated to ±0.08 ‰ and ±0.15 ‰, respectively, systematic errors (u(bias)) for δ C and δ N were calculated to be ±0.10 ‰ and ±0.15 ‰, respectively.. Standard uncertainty was calculated to be ±0.13 for δ13C and ±0.21 for δ15N. Isotopic composition, elemental concentration, and contextual data for samples analyzed in this study are shown in Table 5. Table 1. Accepted δ values for calibrations standards and long-term averages (with 1σ) for collagen check standards used in this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Skeena Fish Passage Culvert Inspection
    Upper Skeena Fish Passage Culvert Inspection Ken Rabnett & Tim Wilson Gitksan Watershed Authorities April 2008 Upper Skeena Fish Passage Culvert Inspections © Gitksan Watershed Authorities 2008 ii Gitksan Watershed Authorities April 2008 Upper Skeena Fish Passage Culvert Inspections Summary The purpose of this report is to present background information and survey results of fish passage inspections along the B.C. Rail grade located in the upper Skeena Watershed. In 2007, Gitksan Watershed Authorities (GWA) was retained by the Pacific Salmon Commission to conduct a Fish Passage and Culvert Inspection (FPCI) on all non-bridged B.C. Rail crossings of fish bearing streams in the upper Skeena Watershed. The upper Skeena Watershed fish passage assessment is the final component of a regional effort to investigate fish passage restrictions to high value fish habitat in the Skeena Basin by highways, secondary roads, and railway grades. This fish passage inspection project focused on the BC Rail grade, which enters the Skeena Watershed a few kilometres south of Bear Lake, traverses Bear Lake and Bear River, passes down Sustut River on the north bank, and goes upstream on the Skeena River north bank passing into the Stikine drainage. The B.C. Rail grade is 195 km in length within the Skeena Watershed. The primary objective of this project was to focus on the potential of increasing the abundance of fish stocks by opening freshwater habitat to salmon spawning and rearing. This project utilized the fish passage culvert inspection procedure developed to evaluate one of the most easily addressed fish habitat constraints: access to existing habitat.
    [Show full text]