Arxiv:1907.13284V1 [Cond-Mat.Other] 31 Jul 2019 Ative Charge Is Broken
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Theory of generalized Josephson effects Aron J. Beekman∗ Department of Physics, and Research and Education Center for Natural Sciences, Keio University, 3-14-1 Hiyoshi, Kohoku-ku, Yokohama 223-8522, Japan (Dated: August 1, 2019) The DC Josephson effect is the flow of supercurrent across a weak link between two superconduc- tors with a different value of their order parameter, the phase. We generalize this notion to any kind of spontaneous continuous symmetry breaking. The quantity that flows between the two systems is identified as the Noether current associated with the broken symmetry. The AC Josephson effect is identified as the oscillations due to the energy difference between the two systems caused by an imposed asymmetric chemical potential. As an example of novel physics, a Josephson effect is pre- dicted between two crystalline solids, potentially measurable as a force periodic in the separation distance. The prediction by Josephson [1] of a DC current flow- (see Fig. 1). The only assumption is that the order pa- ing between two superconductors separated by a small rameters of the two systems couple to each other in a way distance, with zero voltage bias, revealed two important that favors a uniform configuration. This assumption is concepts. First, the order parameter can rightfully be very plausible if one considers the two systems as parts of regarded as a quantum field with an equation of motion, one large system that therefore prefers to break the sym- that does not vanish abruptly at the edge of a sample metry uniformly. Explicitly, the coupling Hamiltonian but must fall off in a continuous fashion. Second, it set- takes the form: tled the debate around broken symmetry in superconduc- K y y tors [2, 3]. It may then be expected that a similar effect HK = − O OR + O OL : (1) 2 L R occurs in any system with spontaneously broken symme- try, since the only prerequisite seems to be a coupling This term must be compensated by HK0 = KjOLjjORj between two systems whose order parameters take dif- so that the energy vanishes when the order parameters ferent values. Indeed, such generalizations have been ex- on left and right are the same. The coupling parameter plored. Of course the phenomenon shows up in helium-4 K > 0 is small with respect to other energy scales. superfluidity because the broken symmetry is essentially Without the coupling Eq. (1), the Hamiltonian H0 is the same as in superconductors, barring the coupling to invariant under a continuous symmetry group G. We gauge fields [4]. Josephson tunneling is also found in can consider the two systems independently, with sym- a a superfluid helium-3, which breaks a non-Abelian symme- metry generators QL and QR, where a runs over the di- try [5]. The Josephson effect has further been generalized mensions of the Lie algebra of G. A symmetry genera- to SO(5)-symmetry proposed for high-Tc superconduc- tor is the volume integral of a Noether charge density: a R a tivity [6, 7]. A spin current flowing between two fer- QL;R = V 2L;R jt (x; t), and the Noether currents are lo- a a romagnets [8{11] or antiferromagnets [12{14] is another cally conserved @tjt (x; t) + r · j (x; t) = 0. We assume manifestation of the Josephson effect. that the symmetry is broken down spontaneously to a Nevertheless, the Josephson effect as an intrinsic prop- subgroup H ⊂ G, due to formation of the order param- erty of spontaneous symmetry breaking has received little eters mL, mR. These order parameters transform under attention, apart from Esposito et al. [15]. They elegantly some representation of G, where the generators Qa are a describe the Josephson effect of a system with inter- represented by Hermitian matrices T ij, so that a general a nal symmetry group O(N) as the appearance of pseudo- transformation generated by QL is parametrized as Goldstone modes due to the explicit but weak breaking iαT a of the doubled symmetry group O(N) × O(N) that gov- mL;i ! e ij mL;j; α 2 R; (2) erns the two uncoupled systems, to the diagonal subgroup and the same for the right system. For convenience we O(N) that leaves the total charge invariant while the rel- have chosen mL, mR to transform under a vector rep- arXiv:1907.13284v1 [cond-mat.other] 31 Jul 2019 ative charge is broken. This method has been applied to resentation, but this is not necessary for anything that spinor Bose{Einstein condensates [16]. We derive the Josephson effect purely in terms of sym- metry transformations of the order parameter operator O. Suppose there are two systems on the left (L) and right (R) in states j Li, j Ri which break some symme- try by the formation of uniform order parameter expec- tation values mL = h LjOLj Li and mR = h RjORj Ri FIG. 1. Typical Josephson setup. Two systems left and right are separated by a small distance w so that their order pa- rameters are coupled. Josephson current I can flow from one ∗ [email protected] system to the other. 2 follows. This transformation is equivalent to the two systems. This can be made more explicit, by writing the left-hand side of Eq. (6) as h[Qa ; O ]i = hT aO i = T a m ; (3) L L L ij L;j Z Z a 3 a 3 a a h@tQLi = d x h@tjL;ti = − d x hr · jLi where by abuse of notation we have also used T as the V V linear transformation acting on the operator O. By Her- I y y y a a ay a = − dS · hjLi = −Iboundary: (8) mitian conjugation [Q ; OL] = −OLT = −OLT be- cause Qa and T a are Hermitian. @V a The space of values that the order parameters mL and The change of Noether charge hQLi is caused by flow of a mR can take is isomorphic to the quotient space G=H, Noether current hjLi through the boundary @V , and the and Eq. (2) can be considered as a rotation in that space. sign of I denoting flow out of the left system (see Fig. 1). We are interested in the situation where mL and mR take This connects with the aforementioned work by Espos- different values in G=H. All the symmetry groups we ito et al. [15] since the broken Noether charge density consider are transitive, which implies that we can always excites Goldstone modes. It also demonstrates that the choose the generators T a in such a way that a single spin Josephson current between two ferromagnets and generator T r connects the right system to the left: that between two antiferromagnets is the same, because they break the same symmetry, even though their or- iαT r mL = mLm0; mR = mRe m0: (4) der parameters are different. Consequently there is no difference in DC Josephson effect between systems with Here m0 is some unit vector, and mL, mR are the mag- type-A or type-B Goldstone modes. nitudes of the order parameters. Most importantly, this result affirms that the Joseph- DC Josephson effect. Turning on the coupling Eq. (1), son effect is general for any type of spontaneous sym- a a the Hamiltonian no longer commutes with QL and QR metry breaking, depending only on ground state order a a separately, although it does commute with QL + QR. We parameters. can now calculate the expectation value with respect to AC Josephson effect. Compared to the DC effect, the the zero-coupling ground state j Li ⊗ j Ri of the time AC Josephson effect is even more ubiquitous. As soon as derivative of the Noether charge of one system, say the one regards the order parameters mL and mR as quan- left, using the Heisenberg equation of motion: tum fields with their own dynamics, it is obvious that there will be an oscillation ∼ eiµt due to an imposed a 1 a h@tQLi = − h[H; QL]i energy difference / µ between left and right systems. In- i~ deed, the AC Josephson effect does not even require su- K y a y a perconductivity and has been suggested to occur in nor- = h [OL;QL]OR + OR[OL;QL] i 2i~ mal metals [17]. In the general setting, it follows from K y a y a adding an asymmetric chemical potential: = h OLT OR − ORT OL i 2i~ K H = µ(Qr − Qr ): (9) = my T am − my T am : (5) µ R L 2i L R R L ~ This term clearly commutes with the symmetry gener- r r Here we have used the fact that OL and OR commute ators QL, QR separately and does not modify the DC and act on different parts of Hilbert space, so we can effect. The order parameter operators OL, OR in most take expectation values of their products trivially. The cases do not commute with the Hamiltonian H0, which last line immediately shows that there is no current if naively implies a time dependence. This is associated mR=mR = mL=mL. But if the order parameter of the with the Anderson tower of states and leads to an ex- right system is rotated with respect to the left and takes tremely slow oscillation of the order parameter expecta- the form of Eq. (4) we find the general form of the DC tion value with time scale that grows with the volume, Josephson effect: and which vanishes in the thermodynamic limit [18]. We will neglect this trivial time dependence, and calculate: a K y a −iαT r iαT r a h@tQ i = mLmRm T e − e T m0: (6) L 2i 0 iµ r ~ @tmL;R = h@tOL;Ri = ∓ h[QL;R; OL;R]i ~ In all cases of interest the right-hand side is only non-zero iµ r when a = r, for which the equation simplifies to = ± T mL;R: (10) ~ r K y r r If we take the order parameters to be mL;R = h@tQ i = − mLmRm T sin(αT )m0: (7) r L 0 iαL;RT ~ mL;Re m0, neglecting higher-order effects by set- ting @tm0 = 0, @tmL;R = 0, we can derive the equations Eqs.