DOCSLIB.ORG

Affordable Housing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Affordable Housing Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) Program Year 2017 July 1, 2017 – June 30, 2018 Submitted to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for Approval on September 28, 2018 Prepared by Develop Louisville - Office of Housing and Community Development Jeff O’Brien, Director, Develop Louisville Gabriel Fritz, Director, Office of Housing and Community Development Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government Greg Fischer Mayor Louisville Metro Council Members 2018 District 1 Jessica Green District 14 Cindi Fowler District 2 Barbara Shanklin District 15 Marianne Butler District 3 Mary C. Woolridge District 16 Scott Reed District 4 Barbara Sexton Smith District 17 Glen Stuckel District 5 Cheri Bryant Hamilton District 18 Marilyn Parker District 6 David James District 19 Julie Denton District 7 Angela Leet District 20 Stuart Benson District 8 Brandon Coan District 21 Vitalis Lanshima District 9 Bill Hollander District 22 Robin Engel District 10 Pat Mulvihill District 23 James Peden District 11 Kevin Kramer District 24 Madonna Flood District 12 Rick Blackwell District 25 David Yates District 13 Vicki Aubrey Welch District 26 Brent Ackerson TO: The General Public DATE: September 14, 2018 RE: Program Year 2017 CAPER (DRAFT) Each year Louisville Metro Government prepares a draft Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) and makes it available to the Public for review and comment. This report summarizes the activities carried out under four U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) entitlement grant programs from July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018. The grant programs are: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), and Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS (HOPWA). Written comments concerning the draft CAPER will be accepted from September 14, 2018 until September 28, 2018. Comments may be submitted via email to [email protected] or via USMail to: Shelby Miles, Grants Contracts Coordinator Office of Housing and Community Development Develop Louisville 444 S. 5th Street, 5th Floor Louisville, KY 40202 CR-05 - Goals and Outcomes Progress the jurisdiction has made in carrying out its strategic plan and its action plan. Louisville Metro Government receives annual grants on a formula basis to carry out a wide range of activities geared toward housing rehabilitation and development, public improvements, economic development, public services, maintaining and improving neighborhoods, and homeless support. The five-year Consolidated Plan is Louisville Metro’s comprehensive planning document and application for funding from four formula grant programs administered by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) Office of Community Planning and Development: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), and Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS (HOPWA). Louisville Metro submitted the 2015-2019 Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government Five-Year Consolidated Plan (Consolidated Plan) on May 15, 2015 and HUD approved it on July 22, 2015. In addition to preparing a five-year strategic plan, Louisville Metro Government is required to submit an annual Action Plan before the start of each Program Year. The Action Plan describes the resources available, the programs/projects to be funded, and the proposed accomplishments for the Program Year. Louisville Metro is also required to provide an assessment of its accomplishments utilizing CDBG, HOME, ESG, and HOPWA entitlement funds at the end of each program year. This Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) summarizes the activities carried out under the final Action Plan for Program Year 2017, which covered the period from July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018. Entitlement allocations for Program Year 2017 included: CDBG funds of $ 10,946,311, HOME funds of $2,831,394, ESG funds of $928,273, and HOPWA funds of $668,960. Estimates of carry-forward funds and program income in the final Action Plan included: estimated CDBG program income of $165,000 and carry-forward/reallocated funds of $424,000; and estimated HOME program income of $75,000 and carry/forward reallocated funds of $54,000. Actual program income received totaled $181,241.23 for CDBG and $374,690.69 for HOME. Table 1 provides an overview of expected accomplishments based on funding proposed in the Program Year 2017 Action Plan and actual accomplishments during the Program Year. These accomplishments include programs assisted with CDBG, HOME, ESG, and HOPWA. The figures in the column for Expected - Strategic Plan refer to the five-year goals set forth in Metro’s 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan. Comparison of the proposed versus actual outcomes for each outcome measure submitted with the consolidated plan: Table 1 - Accomplishments – Program Year & Strategic Plan to Date CAPER 1 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Goal Category Source / Indicator Unit of Expected Actual – Percent Expected Actual – Percent Amount Measure – Strategic Complete – Program Complete Strategic Plan Program Year Plan Year Clearance of Non-Housing vacant or CDBG: Buildings Community Buildings 300 258 72 156 abandoned $904,900 Demolished 86.00% 216.67% Development structures Expand Household Affordable Homeowner homeownership $0 Housing 160 80 0 0 Housing Housing Added 50.00% opportunities Unit CDBG: Expand Direct Financial Affordable $100,000 / Households homeownership Assistance to 0 36 46 68 Housing HOME: Assisted 147.83% opportunities Homebuyers $712,989 Improve existing Homeowner Household Affordable CDBG: owner-occupied Housing Housing 1000 1313 212 308 Housing $2,000,000 131.30% 145.28% units Rehabilitated Unit Increase and CDBG: Household Affordable $1,270,000 Rental units retain affordable Housing 500 0 412 0 Housing HOME: constructed 0.00% 0.00% units Unit $1,739,600 Increase and CDBG: Household Affordable Rental units retain affordable Included Housing 250 3 70 3 Housing rehabilitated 1.20% 4.29% units Above Unit Increase and HOME: Household Affordable Homeowner retain affordable Included Housing 50 17 4 0 Housing Housing Added 34.00% 0.00% units above Unit Micro-enterprise Economic CDBG: Businesses Businesses assisted 125 51 42 23 development Development $350,000 Assisted 40.80% 54.76% Micro-enterprise Economic CDBG: Businesses technical Businesses assisted 500 379 100 206 Development $231,000 Assisted 75.80% 206.00% assistance CAPER 2 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Provide homeless CDBG: Homelessness Persons prevention Homeless $10,000 1100 6741 160 6694 Prevention Assisted 612.82% 4,183.75% services ESG: $45,000 Public service Provide activities for homeownership Affordable CDBG: Households Low/Moderate 7620 3729 950 879 counseling Housing $80,100 Assisted 48.94% 92.53% Income Housing services Benefit Public Facility or Infrastructure Provide Non-Housing CDBG: Activities other than Persons improvements to Community 50000 19590 10000 19590 $2,500,000 Low/Moderate Assisted 39.18% 195.90% public facilities Development Income Housing Benefit Provide rapid re- Tenant-based rental ESG: Households housing for Homeless assistance / Rapid 350 46 39 0 $257,025 Assisted 13.14% 0.00% diversion Rehousing Affordable Tenant-based rental Provide rental HOME: Households Housing assistance / Rapid 250 83 39 34 assistance $350,000 Assisted 33.20% 87.18% Homeless Rehousing Provide street outreach for Homeless ESG: $94,100 Other Other 1000 2000 350 1662 200.00% 474.86% homeless citizens Provide STRMU to Non-Homeless HOPWA: persons with Other Other 800 211 175 52 Special Needs $74,500 26.38% 29.71% HIV/AIDS Provide supportive Non-Homeless HOPWA: services to Other Other 3750 4889 1300 3229 Special Needs $257,000 130.37% 248.38% persons with AIDS Provide TBRA to Tenant-based rental Non-Homeless HOPWA: Households persons with assistance / Rapid 120 72 32 41 Special Needs $195,811 Assisted 60.00% 128.13% HIV/AIDS Rehousing CAPER 3 OMB Control No: 2506-0117 (exp. 06/30/2018) Remove barriers Non-Homeless CDBG: for persons with Other Other 500 75 78 135 Special Needs $200,000 15.00% 173.08% disabilities Public service Shelter operations CDBG: activities other than & case $1,481,200/ Persons Homeless Low/Moderate 80000 33787 18000 2658 management for ESG: Assisted 42.23% 14.77% Income Housing homeless $462,437 Benefit Small business Economic CDBG: Businesses Businesses assisted 15 4 2 4 development Development $200,000 Assisted 26.67% 200.00% Assess how the jurisdiction’s use of funds, particularly CDBG, addresses the priorities and specific objectives identified in the plan, giving special attention to the highest priority activities identified. The 2017 Action Plan included programs/projects to address the priorities and specific objectives identified in the 2015-19 Consolidated Plan and 2017 Action Plan. Progress toward Metro’s housing goal was made during Program Year 2017 through CDBG and HOME-funded activities geared toward homeownership assistance, education, and counseling, housing rehabilitation, and affordable housing development. Through these various programs, 68 households received down payment assistance (including 8 purchasers of homes developed through the CHDO or Affordable Housing Development Program and an additional 34 households through the Metro-wide Down Payment Assistance program), 879 persons received education and counseling services, 308 households
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A 10-Year Perspective of the Merger of Louisville and Jefferson County, KY: Louisville Metro Vaults from 65Th Th to 18 Largest City in the Nation
    A 10-Year Perspective of the Merger of Louisville and Jefferson County, KY: Louisville Metro Vaults From 65th th to 18 Largest City in the Nation Jeff Wachter September, 2013 Over the past 50 years, the idea of merging a city with its neighboring or surrounding county has been contemplated in many American cities, voted upon in a few, and enacted in even fewer. The most prominent American mergers have been Jacksonville, FL; Indianapolis, IN; Nashville, TN; and Lexington, KY. Other cities—including Pittsburgh, PA and Memphis, TN— have attempted mergers, but failed at various stages in the process. City/county consolidation has been a controversial topic, with advocates and opponents pointing to different metrics that support their expectations for the consequences of a merger. Louisville, KY, which merged with Jefferson County on January 1st, 2003, is the most recent example of a city/county consolidation executed by a major American city. This report examines how Louisville Metro has performed over the past decade since the merger took effect by analyzing the city’s economy, population, government spending and efficiency, and public opinion about the merger. In the late 1990s, business and political leaders came together in an attempt to address some of the issues facing the Louisville region, including a long declining population and tax- base, escalating government spending, and multiple economic development organizations fighting to recruit the same businesses (often to the detriment of the greater Louisville region at- large). These leaders determined that a merger of the Louisville and Jefferson County governments was in the best interests of the region, despite the contentious nature of merger debates.
    [Show full text]
  • LOUISVILLE DOWNTOWN Revitalization Team ACTION PLAN
    LOUISVILLE DOWNTOWN Revitalization Team ACTION PLAN 1 FOREWORD This Action Plan showcases the work of a 100+ member team of Louisvillians committed to accelerating downtown Louisville’s recovery following 15 months of the COVID-19 pandemic, including social justice protests, both of which changed our collective lives in downtown. On January 14, 2021, Mayor Greg Fischer announced the creation of the Downtown Revitalization Team at his annual State of the City address, laying out some of the hopes, challenges, and opportunities in the new year ahead. Mayor Fischer called on Louisvillians to reimagine, revitalize, and restore downtown to a thriving and inclusive place for residents, employers, and tourists. The Team is a diverse group of business owners, industry leaders, residents, and community partners who came together in six committees over the course of six months to tackle some of downtown’s most challenging problems. After agreeing to a charter which guided the formation of this Action Plan, committees met at least twice a month, first in small break out groups to discuss issues ranging from public safety, vacant and underutilized office space, tourism, arts & culture, diversity, equity & inclusion, small businesses, downtown residents, and the messaging and perception of downtown. During the second monthly meetings, committee leaders shared the ideas that had emerged during committee discussion, committee goals, and the action steps needed to be taken to move from concept to reality. As the depth of work increased, so did the cross-collaboration across committees, which was anchored by the guidance of the project Steering Committee, a group of twelve dedicated community leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • Board of Directors Meeting September 3, 2008 9:00 A.M. EST Kentucky International Convention Center Louisville, KY
    Board of Directors Meeting September 3, 2008 9:00 a.m. EST Kentucky International Convention Center Louisville, KY Directors in Attendance: Mr. Larry Bisig, Mr. Todd Blue, Mr. Junior Bridgeman, Mr. Tim Corrigan, Ms. Reba Doutrick, Mr. Lanny Greer (Ex Officio) (via telephone), Mr. Eric Gunderson, Vice Chairman Larry Hayes, Ms. Alice Houston, Ms. Cissy Musselman, Metro Council President Jim King (Ex Officio), Mr. James Patterson, Ms. Lindy Street, Mr. William Summers V, Mr. Dan Ulmer, Mr. Robert Woolery, and Chairman Jim Host Directors Absent: Consultants and Staff of Arena Authority: Mr. Harold Workman, Executive Director; Mr. Mark Sommer, General Counsel; Mr. Greg Carey and Mr. Tom Rousakis, Goldman Sachs Special Guests: Governor Steve Beshear; Mayor Jerry Abramson; Dr. James Ramsey, President, University of Louisville Welcome: Chairman Host Chairman Host declared a quorum and convened the meeting. DISCUSSION ITEM: Acceptance of the Minutes of August 28, 2008 Board Meeting – Chairman Host Ms. Doutrick moved to accept the Minutes of the August 28, 2008 Arena Authority meeting. The Motion was seconded by Mr. Bridgeman, and the Motion passed unanimously with no abstentions. DISCUSSION ITEM: Bond Issuance Update – Chairman Host Chairman Host introduced Mr. Tom Rousakis, who provided an update on the Arena financing. Mr. Rousakis announced that on August 26, 2008, $349 million in fixed rate bonds were priced, the financing closed on the morning of September 3, and the funds were delivered to the Arena Authority. Mr. Rousakis explained that closing on the bonds in the current market was monumental. He discussed numerous factors that resulted in the successful closing, including the Arena’s reduced construction cost.
    [Show full text]
  • AP-05 Executive Summary
    AP-05 Executive Summary Introduction Louisville-Jefferson County Metro Government (Louisville Metro) is a consolidated city/county government with an estimated population of 755,809 (2015 American Community Survey 5-year estimate). Louisville Metro participates in four U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) entitlement grant programs: Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA). • CDBG funds are used to contribute to the development of viable urban communities by providing decent housing, suitable living environments, and expanded economic opportunities, principally for low- and moderate-income persons. • HOME funds are used for a wide range of activities including acquiring, developing, and/or rehabilitating affordable housing for rent or homeownership or providing direct rental assistance to low-income people. • ESG funds are used to: engage homeless individuals and families living on the street; improve the number and quality of emergency shelters for homeless individuals and families; operate shelters; provide essential services to shelter residents; rapidly re-house homeless individuals and families; and prevent homelessness. • HOPWA funds provide housing assistance and related supportive services for low-income persons living with HIV/AIDS and their families. HUD requires that local jurisdictions receiving entitlement funds complete a Consolidated Plan every three to five years that describes the jurisdiction’s affordable housing and community development priorities and multiyear goals, based on a needs assessment and market condition analysis. The purpose of the Consolidated Plan is to provide guidance for decisions regarding the use of these federal resources. Louisville Metro’s current Consolidated Plan was approved by HUD on July 22, 2015 and covers the period from July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • International Relocation Guide
    international relocation guide Funding provided by: Welcome! We’re glad you chose to Live in Lou! Whether you’re an immigrant professional, a student enrolled in one of our universities, or a foreign-born worker transferring to Louisville, we’re happy to help you learn how you can actively participate in and enjoy your life in greater Louisville. This Relocation Guide – funded by UPS – is meant to support your transition to our community and lead your journey to enjoying a fulfilling life in Louisville. For expanded information on these and a variety of other topics, visit LiveInLou.com. Table of Contents Page 3............................................................ What Is Greater Louisville? Page 4.........................................................................................Our History Page 5............................................................................Metro Government Page 6 .........................................................Louisville Metro Council Map Page 7....................................................................................Build Your Life Page 8 ..............................................Start Your Life In Greater Louisville Page 9...............................................................................Helpful Numbers Page 10...............................................Support and Transition Resources Page 11 ..............................................................................................Schools Page 12.............................................................................................Children
    [Show full text]
  • Vision Russell TRANSFORMATION PLAN Louisville, Kentucky
    ADOPTED SEPTEMBER 12, 2019 ORDINANCE 40, 2019 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development | Choice Neighborhoods Initiative Vision Russell TRANSFORMATION PLAN Louisville, Kentucky Submitted to Louisville Metro Planning Commission by Louisville Metro Housing Authority July 2019 Prepared for: Prepared by: MAYOR’S MESSAGE What you will see in the Vision Russell Transformation Plan is the culmination of two years of planning by neighborhood residents and stakeholders, city leaders and organizations, along with consultants and staff from Louisville Metro Government (LMG) and the Louisville Metro Housing Authority (LMHA)—all of whom have worked tirelessly to develop this roadmap for Russell’s future. What you will also see is passion and commitment. Passion, because our partners—more than 600 individual residents and organizations who took part in nearly 90 community meetings and events—have shared their vision for the Russell neighborhood and their future. And those ideas and ideals are now reflected in this Transformation Plan. Commitment, because LMG, LMHA and all the partners involved in the Choice Neighborhoods planning process are on board, several with funding in hand, and already working to realize these plans. Many of these partners have been involved in efforts to revitalize Russell for decades or even generations, having laid the foundation for what we are now building upon with our Choice Neighborhoods endeavors. Our momentum in Russell continues to grow thanks to the Department of Urban and Housing Development’s (HUD) deep investment in the neighborhood—first with $425,000 to complete this comprehensive roadmap, then with $1 million to help rebuild community confidence in Russell through highly visible “Action Activities” that will be completed during 2017, and most recently, with the award of a $29.575 million Choice Neighborhoods Implementation grant, which will fund key elements of the Transformation Plan over the next six years, including redevelopment of the Beecher Terrace housing community.
    [Show full text]
  • Louisville Metro Council
    Fiscal Year 2020-2021 Louisville Metro Recommended Executive Budget Greg Fischer, Mayor Ellen Hesen, Deputy Mayor Metro Council District 1 Jessica Green District 2 Barbara Shanklin District 3 Keisha Dorsey District 4 Barbara Sexton Smith District 5 Donna L. Purvis District 6 David James District 7 Paula McCraney District 8 Brandon Coan District 9 Bill Hollander District 10 Pat Mulvihill District 11 Kevin Kramer District 12 Rick Blackwell District 13 Mark H. Fox District 14 Cindi Fowler District 15 Kevin Triplett District 16 Scott Reed District 17 Markus Winkler District 18 Marilyn Parker District 19 Anthony Piagentini District 20 Stuart Benson District 21 Nicole George District 22 Robin Engel District 23 James Peden District 24 Madonna Flood District 25 David Yates District 26 Brent Ackerson https://louisvilleky.gov/ i This Page Left Intentionally Blank ii https://louisvilleky.gov/ OFFICE OF THE MAYOR LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY GREG FISCHER MAYOR April 23, 2020 Dear fellow Louisvillians and Metro Council Members: The FY21 Recommended Budget is the 10th and, in many ways, most difficult budget proposal that I’ve had to present to you as our city, commonwealth, country, and planet struggle with the devastating COVID-19 pandemic. Its health and economic impacts are staggering in scope and still developing as I present this proposal. And the true impact is further complicated by an evolving federal response for providing relief to different segments of our community, economy, and Louisville Metro Government. Given the number of unknown factors, I thought it prudent to present a continuation budget, knowing that we will undoubtedly need to revise it to achieve a structurally balanced and fiscally responsible plan that represents our city values.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013Jeffcodatabook Final.Pdf
    See more of Kentucky Youth Advocates’ work at www.kyyouth.org, follow us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/KentuckyYouthAdvocates, and on Twitter @kyyouth. Please consider making a secure, online tax-deductible donation to help us continue our work. Jefferson County KIDS COUNT Data Book Child Well-Being Across Louisville Metro Council Districts Copyright © 2013 Kentucky Youth Advocates. All rights reserved. Permission to duplicate is granted, provided the source is cited as: Jefferson County KIDS COUNT Data Book: Child Well-Being Across Louisville Metro Council Districts, Kentucky Youth Advocates, Jeffersontown, KY. Content and research by Kentucky Youth Advocates. Data collection and processing by the Kentucky State Data Center at the University of Louisville and by Kentucky Youth Advocates. Kentucky Youth Advocates thanks the James Graham Brown Foundation for their funding of the Jefferson County KIDS COUNT Data Book but acknowledges that the findings and conclusions presented in this report are those of the authors alone and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the Foundation. For additional copies, contact Kentucky Youth Advocates: 11001 Bluegrass Parkway, Suite 100 | Jeffersontown, KY 40299 | Telephone: (502) 895-8167 | Fax: (502) 895-8225 | www.kyyouth.org Acknowledgements Many individuals and organizations devoted Dr. LaQuandra Nesbitt, Louisville Metro Kentucky Justice and Public Safety Cabinet, significant time and energy to the creation of this Department of Public Health & Wellness Department of Juvenile Justice book, and
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Budget and EIP (PDF
    LOUISVILLE DOWNTOWN MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 2020 BUDGET & ECONOMIC IMPROVMENT PLAN LOUISVILLE DOWNTOWN PARTNERSHIP PAGE | 02 To our Downtown Stakeholders A MESSAGE FROM THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR The Louisville Downtown Partnership (LDP) was formed in 2013 and is comprised of two long-standing organizations: The Louisville Downtown Management District (LDMD) and The Louisville Downtown Development Corporation (LDDC). LDMD is Kentucky’s first Business Improvement District (BID), established on August 27, 1991 to promote the economic, residential, and cultural vitality of the core of Downtown. LDMD’s mission is to promote Downtown’s quality of life by creating a safer, cleaner, and more enjoyable environment, and by providing services that are designed to enhance the physical environment of the Downtown, including improvements for better security, maintenance, cleanliness, and marketing (Economic Development, Special Projects, BID Services, Marketing, Communications, and Events). In addition to annual property taxes, Downtown property owners pay a special assessment on parcels located within the Business Improvement District (BID) to fund the Louisville Downtown Management District. The BID provides supplemental services in the public right of way beyond those provided by Louisville Metro Government, as well as additional community enhancements such as beautification of the streetscape and public art installations. Our commitment to these services is one of the cornerstones of Downtown Louisville’s significant growth and positive momentum into
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 State of Metropolitan Housing Report Shows: Fair Housing
    STATE OF METROPOLITAN2014 HOUSING REPORT UT Y IL IT IT L I A E PERTIES U S RO Q P NT L A A C T A V N E M N O R I V N E L AN N D O D I E T V A E T L R O O P P M S E N N T A R C T O D E A LOOK BACK A LOOK FORWARD METROPOLITAN HOUSING COALITION letter to MHC MEMBERS SINCE 1989, THE METROPOLITAN HOUSING COALITION (MHC) Jewish Family and Career Services (JFCS) has been a great HAS BEEN AT THE FOREFRONT of policy that promotes fair partner with MHC and our two agencies are poised, thanks housing for all and affordable housing for low wage families, to generous community support, to open a Community those on fixed incomes, and all whose incomes do not support Development Financial Institution (CDFI) that focuses basic shelter. The first State of Metropolitan Housing Report on micro-business lending and housing in a U.S. Treasury- was published in 2003 with the format of annual measures designated area of Louisville with a lower median income of fair and affordable housing along with a topic for in-depth level. MHC and JFCS have collaborated on this project for research and analysis. MHC developed policy and advocacy over two years and are now prepared to put in place the positions from these reports and continues to work to change final pieces needed to earn U.S. Treasury certification in stagnant policies that prevent housing choice or the ability to the coming year.
    [Show full text]
  • Louisville Metro Council
    Fiscal Year 2019-2020 Louisville Metro Recommended Executive Budget Greg Fischer, Mayor Ellen Hesen, Deputy Mayor Metro Council District 1 Jessica Green District 2 Barbara Shanklin District 3 Keisha Dorsey District 4 Barbara Sexton Smith District 5 Donna L. Purvis District 6 David James District 7 Paula McCraney District 8 Brandon Coan District 9 Bill Hollander District 10 Pat Mulvihill District 11 Kevin Kramer District 12 Rick Blackwell District 13 Mark H. Fox District 14 Cindi Fowler District 15 Kevin Triplett District 16 Scott Reed District 17 Markus Winkler District 18 Marilyn Parker District 19 Anthony Piagentini District 20 Stuart Benson District 21 Nicole George District 22 Robin Engel District 23 James Peden District 24 Madonna Flood District 25 David Yates District 26 Brent Ackerson https://louisvilleky.gov/ i This Page Left Intentionally Blank ii https://louisvilleky.gov/ OFFICE OF THE MAYOR LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY GREG FISCHER MAYOR April 25, 2019 Dear Fellow Citizens and Metro Council Members: The FY20 Recommended Budget I present to you manages the impact of a $35 million deficit, driven largely by repeated 12 percent annual increases in the city’s state pension costs, while minimizing the impact on our city’s most vulnerable. A majority of Metro Council members voted March 21, 2019 against a proposal to generate new revenue that would have fully addressed this year’s deficit and those anticipated in future years due to state-driven pension increases. This plan translates that vote into a budget. FY20 is the second of at least five fiscal years during which Louisville Metro Government’s (LMG) pension obligation will dramatically increase due to revised assumptions made by the Kentucky Retirement Systems in July 2017 and April 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • RAISE Narrative 2021
    Table of Contents I. Project Description ................................................................................................................................ 1 Challenges and Solutions .......................................................................................................................... 1 Broader Context of Project ....................................................................................................................... 4 II. Project Location .................................................................................................................................... 7 Connections to Existing Transportation Infrastructure ............................................................................ 9 III. Grant Funds, Sources, and Uses of Project Funds .......................................................................... 10 IV. Selection Criteria ............................................................................................................................. 11 Safety ...................................................................................................................................................... 11 Environmental Sustainability .................................................................................................................. 16 Quality of Life .......................................................................................................................................... 18 Economic Competitiveness ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]