DOCSLIB.ORG

Sherfield-On-Loddon North Hampshire

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sherfield-On-Loddon North Hampshire Gladman Developments Ltd and Sentinel Housing Association Sherfield-on-Loddon North Hampshire Landscape and Visual Impact Appraisal January 2016 FPCR Environment and Design Ltd Registered Office: Lockington Hall, Lockington, Derby DE74 2RH Company No. 07128076. [T] 01509 672772 [F] 01509 674565 [E] [email protected] [W] www.fpcr.co.uk This report is the property of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd and is issued on the condition it is not reproduced, retained or disclosed to any unauthorised person, either wholly or in part without the written consent of FPCR Environment and Design Ltd. Ordnance Survey material is used with permission of The Controller of HMSO, Crown copyright 100018896. Rev Issue Status Prepared / Date Approved/Date - Draft 1 JJ / 09.07.2014 Draft 2 JJ / 06.01.2015 Draft 3 JJ / 07.07.2015 Draft 4 JJ / 22.07.2015 Draft 5 JJ / 11.01.2016 Landscape and Visual Appraisal fpcr CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 METHODOLOGY .................................................................................................................. 5 3.0 BASELINE CONDITIONS ................................................................................................... 11 4.0 PLANNING CONTEXT ....................................................................................................... 23 5.0 SCHEME DESCRIPTION AND LANDSCAPE MITIGATION ............................................. 33 6.0 ASSESSMENT OF EFFECTS ............................................................................................ 35 7.0 SUMMARY .......................................................................................................................... 43 FIGURES Figure 1: Site Location Figure 2: Aerial Photograph Figure 3: Topography Figure 4A: National Landscape Character Figure 4B: Hampshire County Character Assessment Figure 4C: BDBC Character Types Figure 5: Designations & Policy Figure 6: Photo Viewpoint Locations & Zone of Visual Influence Figures 7: Photograph Viewpoints Figure 8: Site Photographs Figure 9: BDBC Green Infrastructure Strategy Figure 10: BDBC Landscape Capacity Study APPENDICES Appendix A: Landscape Effects Schedule Appendix B: Visual Effects Schedule J:\6300\6346\LANDS\LVIA\6346 LVIA.docx 1 Landscape and Visual Appraisal fpcr PAGE LEFT DELIBERATELY BLANK J:\6300\6346\LANDS\LVIA\6346 LVIA.docx 2 Landscape and Visual Appraisal fpcr 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 This is a Landscape and Visual Impact Appraisal prepared by FPCR Environment and Design Ltd as part of an Outline Planning Application for residential development on land north of Goddards Lane, Sherfield-on-Loddon, North Hampshire. 1.2 Gladman Developments Ltd proposes a residential development and associated green infrastructure with public open space. The proposed development is described within the Design and Access Statement submitted as part of the planning application. 1.3 The site location and its context are shown in Figures 1 and 2. 1.4 For ease of description and for clarity, the report refers to the application site as the site and the development proposals as presented by the outline planning application and by the Masterplan as the Proposed Development. 1.5 The purpose of the report is to provide an assessment of the Proposed Development and the resulting landscape and visual effects on the receiving landscape and visual resource. The landscape and visual effects have been considered in relation to the proposed land uses and parameters that are defined on the application’s Masterplan. J:\6300\6346\LANDS\LVIA\6346 LVIA.docx 3 Landscape and Visual Appraisal fpcr PAGE LEFT DELIBERATELY BLANK J:\6300\6346\LANDS\LVIA\6346 LVIA.docx 4 Landscape and Visual Appraisal fpcr 2.0 METHODOLOGY Principles and Overview 2.1 The report is undertaken as a standalone ‘appraisal’ and is based upon the guidance contained within the Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment, Third Edition (GLVIA3)1, published by the Landscape Institute and the Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment, April 2013. 2.2 In summary the GVLIA3 states : "Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment (LVIA), is a tool used to identify and assess the significance of, and the effects of, change resulting from development on both landscape as an environmental resource in its own right and on people's views and visual amenity (1.3)" LVIA may be carried out either formally as part of an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), or informally, as a contribution to the 'appraisal' of development proposals and planning applications. Both are important and the broad principles and the core of the approach is similar in each case (1.3). As a standalone 'appraisal' the process is informal and there is more flexibility, but the essence of the approach -specifying the nature of the proposed change or development; describing the existing landscape and the views and the visual amenity in the area that may be affected; predicting the effects, although not their likely significance; and considering how these effects might be mitigated- still applies (3.2) 2.3 There are two components which are described separately within this report:- Assessment of landscape effects; assessing effects on the landscape as a resource in its own right; and Assessment of visual effects; assessing effects on specific views and on the general visual amenity experienced by people. 2.4 The GLVIA3 recognises that professional judgement is a very important part of the process, and states that whilst there is some scope for quantitative measurements of some relatively objective matters, much of the assessment must rely on qualitative judgements (para 2.23). 2.5 In terms of baseline studies, the assessment provides an understanding of the landscape in the area to be affected, its constituent elements, character, condition and value. For the visual baseline this includes an understanding of the area in which the Proposed Development may be visible, the people who may experience views, and the nature of views. 2.6 Effects are determined by making judgement about two components:- The nature of the receptor likely to be affected (known by the shorthand 'sensitivity') and; The nature of the effect likely to occur (known by the shorthand 'magnitude'). 2.7 Judgements on sensitivity are made by considering:- The susceptibility of the receptor to the type of change arising from the specific proposal; and The value attached to the receptor. 2.8 Judgements on magnitude are made by considering:- 1 Guidelines for Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment, Landscape Institute and the Institute of Environmental Management and Assessment, April 2013 J:\6300\6346\LANDS\LVIA\6346 LVIA.docx 5 Landscape and Visual Appraisal fpcr The size and scale of the effect, for example whether there is a complete loss of a particular element of the landscape or a minor change; The geographical extent of the area that will be affected; and The duration of the effect and its reversibility. 2.9 In terms of mitigation, primary measures to prevent/avoid, reduce and, where possible, offset or remedy any adverse effects are developed through the iterative design process of the Proposed Development. This is described by the report and is included within the overall assessment of effects. Assessment of Landscape Effects 2.10 GLVIA3 states that “An assessment of landscape effects deals with the effects of change and development on landscape as a resource”. 2.11 The baseline landscape is described by reference to existing landscape character assessments, and by a description of the site and its immediate context. 2.12 A range of landscape effects can arise through development. These can include: Change or loss of elements, features, aesthetic or perceptual aspects that contribute to the character and distinctiveness of the landscape; Addition of new elements that influence character and distinctiveness of the landscape; and Combined effects of these changes. 2.13 These are discussed in the assessment. Susceptibility to Change and Value of the Landscape Receptor 2.14 The characteristics of the existing landscape resource are considered in respect of the susceptibility of the landscape resource to the change arising from the development. 2.15 The value of the existing landscape is also considered. GLVIA3 indicates information that contributes to understanding landscape value. This information is set out in paragraph 5.20 of the GLVIA3 and includes:- Information about areas recognised by statute such as National Parks and Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty; Information about Heritage Coasts, where relevant; Local planning documents, for local landscape designations; Information on individual or groups of features such as conservation areas, listed buildings, special historic or cultural sites; Art and literature identifying value attached to particular areas or views; and Material on landscape of local or community interest. 2.16 Where there is no clear existing evidence on landscape value, an appraisal is made based on the following factors, based on the guidance in GLVIA3:- J:\6300\6346\LANDS\LVIA\6346 LVIA.docx 6 Landscape and Visual Appraisal fpcr Landscape quality (condition); Scenic quality; Rarity; Representativeness; Conservation interest; Recreation value; Perceptual aspects; and Associations. Magnitude of Landscape Effects 2.17 Each effect on landscape receptors is assessed in terms of size or scale, geographical extent of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Old Basing and Lychpit 3
    O LD B ASING &LYCHPIT V ILLAGE D ESIGN S TATEMENT 2006 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 PARISH MAP 2 HISTORY OF OLD BASING AND LYCHPIT 3 LANDSCAPE AND SURROUNDINGS 6 The countryside around the village 6 Views into and out of Old Basing and Lychpit 7 Significant features of the local ecology 7 Guidelines 7 PATTERN AND CONTENT OF THE SETTLEMENT 9 Important open spaces 9 Other amenities 10 Trees, hedgerows and boundaries 10 Footpaths 11 Guidelines 12 BUILDINGS AND MATERIALS 13 Style and form 13 The Conservation Area 13 1940s-70s developments 14 Late 20th century developments 14 Significant historical buildings 14 Significant modern buildings 15 Materials 15 Guidelines 16 TRAFFIC AND VEHICLES 17 Guidelines 17 Other traffic related issues of local concern 18 APPENDIX 19 Consultation of residents Questionnaire July 2005 - Summary of Findings ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 1 INTRODUCTION Purpose of the Village Design Statement The Borough Council will continue to work with the residents This Village Design Statement describes the natural and and Parish Council of Old Basing and Lychpit to adopt the man-made features of Old Basing and Lychpit, which its VDS as a supplementary planning document in the future. residents regard as especially distinctive. Location Its purpose is to guide future developments and changes so Old Basing and Lychpit is a large and historic village set in the that they respect and maintain the character and integrity of valley of the River Loddon 5 kilometres east of the town of the village and its community. Basingstoke in northeast Hampshire. A significant part of the settlement lies within the Old Basing Conservation Area.
    [Show full text]
  • Newnham: a History of the Parish and Its Church
    NEWNHAM: A HISTORY OF THE PARISH AND ITS CHURCH SUMMARY Newnham is a long-established community. It dates from well before 1130, which is the earliest written reference. It has some unusual features, for example being built on a ridge away from water. Its church, despite being renovated by the Victorians, yet contains many interesting elements, including a wonderful Norman chancel arch and a carved-in-stone memorial to a priest of the 13th century – comparable to a brass but in this case perhaps unique in Hampshire. Its oldest bell has been ringing over the land since Henry VII was king (1485-1509). It is a charming backwater, aside from the mainstream of headlong 'progress'. A place where the generations have made their contribution and laid their bones – the very essence of rural England. SETTING Newnham, as it exists today, lies on a ridge of high ground above and to the east of the river Lyde. The central feature is The Green enclosed on three sides by a cluster of houses. Here four lanes meet at the crossroads, a fifth leads to the church and a sixth branches away, past the pub. Along these lanes are scattered many dwellings: some very old, others newer. The highest point is the church which stands about 95m or 312 ft above sea level, the Green itself is a little lower. The soil is Plateau Gravel with London Clay preponderating in the surrounding area as it falls away in each direction; immediately along the Lyde the soil is Alluvium (1). The geology to some extent explains the location of the settlement: the plateau gravel lies above a 'saucer' of clay so that rainfall percolates through to the impermeable clay where it is retained; when a well is sunk through the gravel, water is found fairly close to the surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation Sincs Hampshire.Pdf
    Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) within Hampshire © Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre No part of this documentHBIC may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recoding or otherwise without the prior permission of the Hampshire Biodiversity Information Centre Central Grid SINC Ref District SINC Name Ref. SINC Criteria Area (ha) BD0001 Basingstoke & Deane Straits Copse, St. Mary Bourne SU38905040 1A 2.14 BD0002 Basingstoke & Deane Lee's Wood SU39005080 1A 1.99 BD0003 Basingstoke & Deane Great Wallop Hill Copse SU39005200 1A/1B 21.07 BD0004 Basingstoke & Deane Hackwood Copse SU39504950 1A 11.74 BD0005 Basingstoke & Deane Stokehill Farm Down SU39605130 2A 4.02 BD0006 Basingstoke & Deane Juniper Rough SU39605289 2D 1.16 BD0007 Basingstoke & Deane Leafy Grove Copse SU39685080 1A 1.83 BD0008 Basingstoke & Deane Trinley Wood SU39804900 1A 6.58 BD0009 Basingstoke & Deane East Woodhay Down SU39806040 2A 29.57 BD0010 Basingstoke & Deane Ten Acre Brow (East) SU39965580 1A 0.55 BD0011 Basingstoke & Deane Berries Copse SU40106240 1A 2.93 BD0012 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood North SU40305590 1A 3.63 BD0013 Basingstoke & Deane The Oaks Grassland SU40405920 2A 1.12 BD0014 Basingstoke & Deane Sidley Wood South SU40505520 1B 1.87 BD0015 Basingstoke & Deane West Of Codley Copse SU40505680 2D/6A 0.68 BD0016 Basingstoke & Deane Hitchen Copse SU40505850 1A 13.91 BD0017 Basingstoke & Deane Pilot Hill: Field To The South-East SU40505900 2A/6A 4.62
    [Show full text]
  • Sherfield on Loddon Neighbourhood Development Plan
    SHERFIELD ON LODDON NEIGHBOURHOOD DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2011 TO 2029 SUBMISSION VERSION AUGUST 2017 Sherfield on Loddon Parish Council Sherfield on Loddon Neighbourhood Development Plan 2 Sherfield on Loddon Neighbourhood Development Plan SUMMARY OF CONTENTS 1 .. About this document ................................................................................................. 10 2 .. Introduction ............................................................................................................... 11 3 .. About Sherfield on Loddon ........................................................................................ 16 4 .. Community Engagement ............................................................................................ 26 5 .. The future of Sherfield on Loddon ............................................................................. 30 6 .. Policies for Sherfield on Loddon ................................................................................ 35 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS DOCUMENT Abbreviation/Term Explanation BDBC Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council CIL Community Infrastructure Levy HCC Hampshire County Council HQ Household Questionnaire NPPF National Planning Policy Framework NPWP Sherfield on Loddon Neighbourhood Plan Working Party NDP Sherfield on Loddon Neighbourhood Development Plan PC Parish Council SoL Sherfield on Loddon SINCs Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation SPA Thames Basin Heaths Special Protection Area SAPF Hampshire County Council Small Area Population Forecasts
    [Show full text]
  • Loddon Catchment Implementation Plan
    Loddon Catchment Implementation Plan January 2012 – FOR COMMMENT (Version C2) Glossary.....................................................................................................................3 1 Introduction...................................................................................................6 2 Loddon catchment summary.......................................................................9 2.1 General Description .....................................................................................9 2.2 Catchment map........................................................................................... 10 3 Water body information ............................................................................. 11 3.1 Classification.................................................................................................. 11 3.2 Heavily Modified Water Bodies..................................................................... 11 4 Actions ........................................................................................................ 11 4.1 Operational monitoring (2010-12) ............................................................. 12 4.2 Investigations (2010-12)............................................................................. 12 4.3 Improvement actions (in place by 2012)................................................... 12 4.3.1 ‘Day Job’ activities.............................................................................................. 13 4.3.2 Field actions ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Display PDF in Separate
    T h ^ j ^ c j NRA Thames 249 1‘ DATE OUT : THE BLACKWATER RIVER CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FIRST ANNUAL REVIEW 95/96 DRAFT DOCUMENT 1 ENVIRONMENT AGENCY ■ ■ 111 122688 CONTENTS Section: Page No 1.0 Executive Summary v 1.1 Thames 21 2.0 Vision for the Catchment 3.0 Introduction 4.0 Catchment Overview 5.0 Summary of Progress 5.1 Cove Brook Landscape Assessment 5.3 Environmental Impact Assessment on the Blackwater River 5.4 Water Quality 5.5 Watersports within the catchment 5.6 Pollution Incidents in the Blackwater Catchment 5.7 Oil Care Campaign 5.8 Public Involvement 6.0 Monitoring Report 6.1 Format 7.0 Additions to the Action Tables 7.1 Additional Issues 7.2 Additional Actions 8.0 Activities - (The Action Tables) 9.0 Future Reviews Appendices: I Contacts IV Water Quality II Abbreviations V Pollution Incidents III Progress of Development Plans y> NOTE : THIS PAGE IS TO CONTAIN AN APPROPRIATE STATEMENT RE :THE FORMATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL AGENCY TOGETHER WITH THE NRA ’MISSION STATEMENT’. For further information regarding this CMP Review, please contact : Mark Hodgins National Rivers Authority Riverside Works Sunbury-on-Thames Middlesex TW6 6AP (Tel: 01932 789833) 3 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY One of the main objectives of an Animal Review h to record the progress of Catchment actions as identified la the Blackwater River Catchment Management Han * Final Plan (renamed the Actioultai)* The progression of activities within the catchment as of November 1994 onwards has been generally vety good* fit total there were,.* actions identfed in the Blackwater Final Plan, for the period 1994 and 1999* ,.., of these actions have been successfully completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Display PDF in Separate
    www.environment-agency.gov.uk Further Surveys to Elucidate the Distribution of the Fine-Lined Pea M ussel Pisidium tenuilineatum Stelfox, 1918 Technical Report W 1 - 0 5 4 / T R ENGLISH NATURE Environm ent A g e n c y Further surveys to elucidate the distribution of the fine-lined pea mussel Pisidium tenuilineatum Stelfox, 1918 R&D Technical Report W1-054/TR Ian Killeen and Martin J. Willing Research Contractor: Malacological Services Publishing Organisation: Environment Agency, Rio House, Waterside Drive, Aztec West, Almondsbury, Bristol BS12 4UD Tel: 01454 624400 Fax: 01454 624409 © Environment Agency 2004 ISBN: 1 844321142 All rights reserved. No part of this document may be produced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior permission of the Environment Agency. The views expressed in this document are not necessarily those of the Environment Agency. Its officers, servants or agents accept no liability whatsoever for any loss or damage arising from the interpretation or use of the information, or reliance upon views contained herein. Dissemination status Internal: Released to Regions External: Publicly Available Statement of use This report is an integral part of the UK Biodiversity Action Plan for the fine lined pea mussel Pisidium tenuilineatum. It is to enable conservation staff and those managing water and land to be alerted to the presence of the species and preliminary guidance on its protection. The report is a foundation for research to determine the species’ ecological requirements definitively as a basis for effective guidance on protecting the species.
    [Show full text]
  • The State of England's Chalk Streams
    FUNDED WITH CONTRIBUTIONS FROM REPORT UK 2014 The State of England’s Chalk Streams This report has been written by Rose O’Neill and Kathy Hughes on behalf of WWF-UK with CONTENTS help and assistance from many of the people and organisations hard at work championing England’s chalk streams. In particular the authors would EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 like to thank Charles Rangeley-Wilson, Lawrence Talks, Sarah Smith, Mike Dobson, Colin Fenn, 8 Chris Mainstone, Chris Catling, Mike Acreman, FOREWORD Paul Quinn, David Bradley, Dave Tickner, Belinda by Charles Rangeley-Wilson Fletcher, Dominic Gogol, Conor Linsted, Caroline Juby, Allen Beechey, Haydon Bailey, Liz Lowe, INTRODUCTION 13 Bella Davies, David Cheek, Charlie Bell, Dave Stimpson, Ellie Powers, Mark Gallant, Meyrick THE STATE OF ENGLAND’S CHALK STREAMS 2014 19 Gough, Janina Gray, Ali Morse, Paul Jennings, Ken Caustin, David Le Neve Foster, Shaun Leonard, Ecological health of chalk streams 20 Alex Inman and Fran Southgate. This is a WWF- Protected chalk streams 25 UK report, however, and does not necessarily Aquifer health 26 reflect the views of each of the contributors. Chalk stream species 26 Since 2012, WWF-UK, Coca-Cola Great Britain and Pressures on chalk streams 31 Coca-Cola Enterprises have been working together Conclusions 42 to secure a thriving future for English rivers. The partnership has focused on improving the health A MANIFESTO FOR CHALK STREAMS 45 of two chalk streams directly linked to Coca-Cola operations: the Nar catchment in Norfolk (where AN INDEX OF ENGLISH CHALK STREAMS 55 some of the sugar beet used in Coca-Cola’s drinks is grown) and the Cray in South London, near 60 to Coca-Cola Enterprises’ Sidcup manufacturing GLOSSARY site.
    [Show full text]
  • Winchfield to Bramley
    Introduction This section links two railway stations which are connected via Basingstoke. There is also a bus service between Basingstoke and Bramley via Sherfield on Loddon. Always check the latest times at www.travelinesw.com. Parking is limited at both ends: at Winchfield weekend parking can be found at the station, at Bramley either side road parking near the railway station or west of the railway line at the recreation ground. This section of the Brenda Parker Way includes some attractive riverside scenery, particularly along the Rivers Whitewater and Loddon valleys, but also some World War Two defences and picturesque farms houses. The Explorer map 144 is required. The Route Winchfield to West Green Leave Winchfield railway station from the north side and turn left along the roadside pavement, round the corner to the left onto the B3016 and past the bus stop. At the railway bridge cross the road and take the footpath which runs beside the railway, then down some steps, under the M3 and up the other side. At the track, Old Potbridge Road, turn left and then right before the railway bridge. Follow this track, keeping the high deer fence on your left and at the gate the track turns right and passes a Second World War pill box. Follow this green lane towards the A30 and after crossing a small stream look out for a path to the right over a stile. Take this footpath to the A30, carefully cross the dual carriageway to a stile a little to your right. Follow the path around a pumping station and along the field edge to a path junction beside another pill box.
    [Show full text]
  • River Lyde – Manor Farm
    River Lyde – Manor Farm An advisory visit carried out by the Wild Trout Trust – July 2009 1. Introduction This report is the output of a Wild Trout Trust advisory visit undertaken on the River Lyde at Manor Farm. The advisory visit was undertaken at the request of Mr. John Lewin on behalf of his father, Mr. Colin Lewin who is the owner of Manor Farm. Comments in this report are based on observations on the day of the site visit and discussions primarily with John and Colin Lewin. Throughout the report, normal convention is followed with respect to bank identification i.e. banks are designated Left Bank (LB) or Right Bank (RB) whilst looking downstream. 2. Catchment overview Rising from chalk aquifer near Mapledurwell and old Basing in North Hampshire, the River Lyde is a delightful chalkstream tributary of the River Loddon. The Lyde is approximately 8km in length and joins the Loddon about 1km upstream of Sherfield on Loddon. The Manor Farm beat is approximately 1km in length and lies roughly in the central section of the river. The Lyde is a true chalkstream and along with the Loddon and Whitewater form a network of north Hampshire chalk rivers. Although these streams are not as famous by reputation as some of the larger Hampshire chalkstream fisheries, they are, none the less, extremely valuable and productive. The Lyde has been assessed as having excellent quality water and is rated as class A under the Environment Agency’s General Quality Assessment. Abstraction pressures are mainly confined to a non consumptive abstraction supplying water for the Andwell Mill Trout Farm.
    [Show full text]
  • Walks Booklet Cover
    Walks around the Parish of Old Basing Published by : The Footpath Committee, Old Basing Parish Council, The Pavilion, The Recreation Ground, The Street, Old Basing, BASINGSTOKE, Hants., RG24 7DA £2.00 © 1998-2020, Old Basing Parish Council Legend and Notes Legend FP Old Basing Footpath 1 BFP Basingstoke Footpath CFP Chineham Footpath MFP Mapledurwell Footpath NFP Newnham Footpath SFP Sherfield On Loddon Footpath SJFP Sherborne St. John Footpath TFP Tunworth Footpath MFP Mapledurwell Footpath Look to the Left Look to the Right PH Public House Lime[1] Trees and plants to be seen on the walk whose location is shown on the map, identified by the number within the square brackets. e.g. [1] Notes : 1. The walks described herein comply with the latest known information on rights of way, and supersedes details which can be seen on the last edition of the Ordnance Survey maps for the area. All walks have been checked during 1997. 2. Paths across working farms are often subject to change depending on agricultural requirements, therefore stiles and gates may be interchanged as required. 3. The Footpath Committee wish to acknowledge the help and assistance, kindly given by Brian Tarling and Alec Jackson, in compiling this booklet. 4. Dogs. Dogs are not permitted on the Old Basing Recreation Ground. Therefore parties with dogs who are following walks which cross this land will have to use the following alternative. They should keep right whilst crossing Oliver’s Battery and in far corner pass into The Street, and walk in front of Recreation Ground then turn left into Riley Lane.
    [Show full text]
  • The Loddon Catchment Proposals for Statutory Water Quality Objectives
    mm NRA THAMES 64 The Loddon Catchment THAMES REGION Proposals for Statutory Water Quality Objectives NRA National Rivers Authority Guardians of the Water Environment En v ir o n m e n t A g e n c y NATIONAL LIBRARY & INFORMATION SERVICE HEAD OFFICE Rio House, Waterside Drive, Aztec West, Almondsbury, Bristol BS32 4UD aj£4 Published by National Rivers Authority Rivers House Waterside Drive Aztec West Almondsbury Bristol BS12 4UD Tel 01454 624 400 March 1996 © National Rivers Authority All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the National Rivers Authority. The Loddon Catchment INTRODUCTION TO THIS CONSULTATION DOCUMENT This document sets out the proposals the proposed quality targets. We have also • of the National Rivers Authority (NRA) taken account, where appropriate, of the and the Environment Agency (the Agency) levels of investment by the water industry for Statutory Water Quality Objectives that were agreed by Government for the (SWQOs) for stretches of river in the purpose of setting revised price limits from Loddon catchment. Its purpose is to 1995 onwards. Our existing River Quality provide local organisations and individuals Objectives (RQOs) largely reflect our view with the opportunity to comment before of, and longer-term agreements on, the more formal Government consultations needs of river stretches. In general, we have take place. This is the start of a process therefore proposed SWQOs that are which may ultimately lead to the setting of consistent with RQOs in keeping with our SWQOs by the Secretary of State.
    [Show full text]