Science Fiction, Gender, and Race

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Science Fiction, Gender, and Race Science Fiction, Gender, and Race: How Star Trek Has Failed to Live Up to its Progressive Ideals Justin Grays GNDR 360I-02 2 May 2012 Dr. Laura McCartan Grays 1 Table of Contents Section One: Introduction to Paper ​ Section Two: A Brief History of Star Trek ​ ​ Section Three: Gender, Race, and Intersection. ​ Section Four: Why Media Matters ​ rd Section Five: The 23 ​ Century: A Progressive Beginning ​ ​ Section Six: Problems in the Bright Future ​ th Section Seven: The 24 ​ Century: The Future is Less Bright ​ ​ nd Section Eight: The 22 ​ Century: Progress is Lost ​ ​ rd Section Nine: Rebook: A New Take on the 23 ​ Century ​ ​ Section Ten: Conclusion ​ Section Eleven: Works Cited ​ Grays 2 INTRODUCTION Star Trek, created by Gene Roddenberry, has been viewed as a progressive ​ franchise when the first television series, now recognized as Star Trek: The Original ​ Series, and the first spin-off series, Star Trek: The Animated Series, were compared to ​ ​ ​ the social and political stances of gender and race in the society of the era. When keeping the views of American society of the 1960s in mind, The Original Series and ​ The Animated Series had main characters, secondary characters, and supporting roles that alternated between defying traditional views of gender and race in society of that era. The Star Trek television shows made commentary about social and ​ ​ political mores of that time period. Because of television censor rules of what could and could not be shown on the air, Star Trek producers and writers had to find ways ​ to appease the network executives so that the Star Trek series’ could be aired on ​ American television. Though The Original Series and The Animated Series lasted only five seasons ​ ​ ​ combined, the following Star Trek feature films continued with the theme of taking ​ on issues of the human condition, featuring ideas about human growth, eugenics, religion, and politics. However, Star Trek: The Next Generation attempted to make ​ similar commentary for the 1980s and 1990s as The Original Series and The ​ ​ Animated Series did for the 1960s and 1970s. The Next Generation had a harder time ​ ​ with making said gendered and racial commentary due to attempting to identify itself as being farther in the future than The Original Series was. There was also the ​ ​ Grays 3 changed role of Roddenberry’s position in the production of the series and his eventual death, and the differing views of gender and race from the new production staff members who had taken over from Roddenberry. Though a couple of episodes ​ of The Next Generation were taken from scripts that were to have been used for the ​ ​ aborted Star Trek: Phase II, the aforementioned differences between The Original ​ ​ ​ Series and The Next Generation are apparent in the roles given to the main ​ characters. As the Star Trek franchise grew over time, into the creation of Star Trek: Deep ​ ​ Space Nine (1993-1999) and Star Trek: Voyager (1995-2001), the commentary ​ ​ about gender and race in society tended to come in at a more gradual pace, despite the fact that the commanding officer on Deep Space Nine was African-American with ​ a female first officer, and the commanding officer of Voyager was female with a ​ Native American Indian first officer. Generally, the actors had to make suggestions and changes to keep the writers and producers from stereotyping gender and racial roles in the Star Trek franchise. However, the last Star Trek television series, ​ ​ Enterprise (2001-2005), and the latest film, Star Trek XI (also known as Star Trek), ​ ​ ​ ​ took a step backwards in the roles of gender and race for main characters in the series. The progressive stance of the Star Trek franchise began to evaporate ​ throughout Enterprise, and became even more apparent when comparing Star Trek ​ ​ ​ XI (which is a reboot of the Star Trek franchise) to Star Trek: The Original Series. ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ HISTORY Grays 4 Eugene “Gene” Roddenberry created Star Trek in 1964, when he presented ​ his idea of a “wagon train to the stars” to television studios. Desilu Studios picked up the series and presented it to NBC, and the first pilot episode, “The Cage,” was produced, followed by the second pilot, “Where No Man Has Gone Before,” produced st in 1965. On April 21 ,​ 1966, Star Trek entered production and lasted for three ​ ​ seasons, when it had been canceled for the perception of having low viewership; though the series had a Neilson rating of between 20 and 24, which would be a hit today, having a 30 share was iffy (Gross, 65). The fan base for Star Trek was ​ powerful enough to bring back Star Trek in an animated form for two seasons, ​ th starting September 8 ,​ 1973 (Gross, 79-80; Reeves-Stevens, 16). ​ The television franchise in the 1970s paused at the end of The Animated ​ Series. In 1977, Paramount Pictures attempted to create a new television network, ​ with Star Trek: Phase II as the flagship program, collapsed (Reeves-Stevens, 34). ​ After the network deal collapsed, what was to be the feature-length pilot became the first Star Trek film: Star Trek: The Motion Picture. Star Trek continued to make films ​ ​ ​ ​ throughout the early and mid 1980s, but did not return to television until Star Trek: ​ The Next Generation premiered in September of 1987. Star Trek: Deep Space Nine ​ premiered in January 1993, running concurrently through the final two seasons of The Next Generation and the first five seasons of Star Trek: Voyager, which ​ ​ premiered in January of 1995. Grays 5 Star Trek: Enterprise, the only television prequel, aired September 26, 2001, ​ after Voyager had completed its final season. The final episode of Enterprise aired on ​ ​ th May 13 ,​ 2005, making 2006 to be the first year in 19 years to not have a Star Trek ​ ​ television series in production. Years later, the Star Trek film franchise was ​ th re-launched with Star Trek XI premiering on May 8 ,​ 2009, and an expected release ​ ​ th date for Star Trek XII being May 17 ,​ 2013. The Star Trek movie and film franchise ​ ​ ​ comes to being over 530 hours (or 22 days) of Star Trek. ​ ​ GENDER, RACE, AND INTERSECTION Gender is the set of social standards and expectations that are associated with and represent each sex (Dines, 4; Kesselman, 9; Peach, 2); it is not to be confused with sex, which is the physical or biological characteristics that make up a physical body. Race is the social or cultural concept that describes people based on visual clues from physical appearances and behaviors (Anthropological; Dines, 4), part of which is determined by ethnicity and common heritage, but not restricted to those commonalities. In this paper, gender is looked at over sex because social interaction is based off of the perceived gender of a person, or how the person represents their gender publically, and race is used over ethnicity because the social interactions used in this society because of the visual cues used to assign stereotypes to groupings of individuals. Grays 6 Race is gendered and gender is raced: the barriers in place in society that affect those not of the dominant gender also effect those not of the dominant race. Though there are differences in the privileges provided or denied between gender and race, the provisions and denials of the two are interlinked; however, gender and race are often not considered together when recognizing barriers. Audre Lorde provides an example, pointing out the “absence of the experience of women of color as a resource for women’s studies courses. The literature of women of color is seldom included in women’s literature courses and almost never in other literature courses, nor in women’s studies as a whole” (Peach, 72), citing the presence of William Shakespeare and Fyodor Dostoyevsky in literature, but showing that the works of authors, such as Zora Neale Hurston and Gwendolyn Brooks, are not included in literature selections. When considering concepts of gender and race in society, and the reflections that are shown in media, the intersection between gender and race needs to be considered, for oppression is an additive quality, placing members of disadvantaged groups at a further disadvantage. WHY MEDIA MATTERS To understand the impact that the Star Trek franchise has had on society, one ​ must first recognize that the media’s representation of the world helps shape the views of a society. Because “media images help shape our view of the world and our deepest values: what we consider good or bad, positive or negative, moral or evil” Grays 7 (Dines, 9), a society will learn to accept or begin to demonize due to the images that are presented to them by those who control what is seen and recognized. The ideas represented in various forms of media affects members of society across gender, racial, and class lines. An idea of what creates gender and race, and what it means to be of a gender or race, is perpetrated through media sources. Myths and mysticisms about what normal gender roles and the placement of gender in society is dictated by what is observed and repeated in the media, through the use of commercialization and political and religious convenience. Portrayals of race and the cultural appropriations of history that create what it means to be of a certain ethnicity or background are repeated in televised and printed stories and are often repeated for the viewing audience to take in and mimic. These ideas and portrayals are then copied and reproduced as the viewership and readers come to expect to see what they see, as the mindset of those following the media become used to what is being seen and start to expect it.
Recommended publications
  • STEPHEN MARK, ACE Editor
    STEPHEN MARK, ACE Editor Television PROJECT DIRECTOR STUDIO / PRODUCTION CO. DELILAH (series) Various OWN / Warner Bros. Television EP: Craig Wright, Oprah Winfrey, Charles Randolph-Wright NEXT (series) Various Fox / 20th Century Fox Television EP: Manny Coto, Charlie Gogolak, Glenn Ficarra, John Requa SNEAKY PETE (series) Various Amazon / Sony Pictures Television EP: Blake Masters, Bryan Cranston, Jon Avnet, James Degus GREENLEAF (series) Various OWN / Lionsgate Television EP: Oprah Winfrey, Clement Virgo, Craig Wright HELL ON WHEELS (series) Various AMC / Entertainment One Television EP: Mark Richard, John Wirth, Jeremy Gold BLACK SAILS (series) Various Starz / Platinum Dunes EP: Michael Bay, Jonathan Steinberg, Robert Levine, Dan Shotz LEGENDS (pilot)* David Semel TNT / Fox 21 Prod: Howard Gordon, Jonathan Levin, Cyrus Voris, Ethan Reiff DEFIANCE (series) Various Syfy / Universal Cable Productions Prod: Kevin Murphy GAME OF THRONES** (season 2, ep.10) Alan Taylor HBO EP: Devid Benioff, D.B. Weiss BOSS (pilot* + series) Various Starz / Lionsgate Television EP: Farhad Safinia, Gus Van Sant, THE LINE (pilot) Michael Dinner CBS / CBS Television Studios EP: Carl Beverly, Sarah Timberman CANE (series) Various CBS / ABC Studios Prod: Jimmy Smits, Cynthia Cidre, MASTERS OF SCIENCE FICTION (anthology series) Michael Tolkin ABC / IDT Entertainment Jonathan Frakes Prod: Keith Addis, Sam Egan 3 LBS. (series) Various CBS / The Levinson-Fontana Company Prod: Peter Ocko DEADWOOD (series) Various HBO 2007 ACE Eddie Award Nominee | 2006 ACE Eddie Award Winner Prod: David Milch, Gregg Fienberg, Davis Guggenheim 2005 Emmy Nomination WITHOUT A TRACE (pilot) David Nutter CBS / Warner Bros. Television / Jerry Bruckheimer TV Prod: Jerry Bruckheimer, Hank Steinberg SMALLVILLE (pilot + series) David Nutter (pilot) CW / Warner Bros.
    [Show full text]
  • The Changing Definition of Security by James Sperling and Emil Kirchner
    The Changing Definition of Security by James Sperling and Emil Kirchner Paper delievered at the ECSA Conference Charleston, South Carolina, 11-14 May 1995 The Changing Definition of Security A reconfiguration of Europe's strategic landscape and a redefinition of security have taken place in Europe. The security concerns of individual states and the NATO alliance have expanded and now embrace not only the preoccupation with territorial integrity and military security, but also include issues ranging from macroeconomic stability to environmental degradation. This broadened redefinition of security raises an important question: what connections are there between the military and these broader nonmilitary elements of security? For the greater part of the cold war era, security was conceived primarily, if not exclusively, in terms of military security, in terms of sustaining the nuclear balance of terror between the superpowers and the conventional balance of power on the Eurasian landmass. Despite the heavy emphasis upon the military element of national security, attention was paid to the economic underpinnings of military prowess. Nonetheless, economic issues were subordinated and treated as an adjunct to the more important and pressing issue of military security. Economic security was not a relevant analytical category until the late 1960s. Economic issues grew more salient in the late 1960s and were increasingly treated as important political and broader architectural elements of both national security and the larger security order. A few studies of the western alliance in the late 1960s and early 1970s emphasized the importance of economic relations between the members of the Atlantic alliance; they focused on the importance of those economic relationships as critical struts undergirding the Atlantic Alliance and the security of its member-states.1 The growing remoteness of a military threat to European security combined with an increased frequency of economic conflict within the Atlantic area during the 1970s and 1980s.
    [Show full text]
  • GARRET DONNELLY EDITOR TELEVISION PAINKILLER (Limited Series) Netflix Prod: Eric Newman, Micah Fitzerman-Blue Dir: Peter Berg Noah Harpster
    GARRET DONNELLY EDITOR TELEVISION PAINKILLER (Limited Series) Netflix Prod: Eric Newman, Micah Fitzerman-Blue Dir: Peter Berg Noah Harpster NARCOS: MEXICO (Season 1-3) Netflix Prod: Eric Newman, Tim King Dir: Josef Kubota Wladyka Amat Escalante Andres Baiz NOS4A2 (Season 2) AMC Prod: Jami O’Brien Dir: Craig William MacNeill KNIGHTFALL (Season 2) The History Channel Prod: Aaron Helbing, Josh Appelbaum Dir: Rick Jacobson Andre Nemic, Jeff Pickner David Wellington Scott Rosenberg HEATHERS (Season 1) Paramount Network Prod: Jason Micallef, Tom Rosenberg Dir: Adam Silver Gary Lucchesi, Annie Mebane Jessica Lowrey Keith Raskin THE NIGHT SHIFT (Season 4) Sony TV/NBC Prod: Jeff Judah, Gabe Sachs, Tom Garrigus Dir: Various 24: LEGACY (Season 1) 20th Century Fox/FOX Prod: Evan Katz, Manny Coto, Jon Cassar Dir: Nelson McCormick Howard Gordon, Stephen Hopkins Jon Cassar TYRANT (Seasons 2-3) 20th Century Fox/FX Prod: Chris Keyser, Howard Gordon Dir: Various Glenn Gordon Caron, David Fury SECOND CHANCE (Season 1) 20th Century Fox/FOX Prod: Rand Ravich, Donald Todd Dir: Various Howard Gordon, Brad Turner HOMELAND (Episodes 401, 412) Fox 21/Showtime Prod: Alex Gansa, Howard Gordon Dir: Lesli Linka Glatter RAY DONOVAN (Episode 204) Showtime Prod: Ann Biderman Dir: Tucker Gates ASSISTANT EDITOR (TELEVISION) PROOF (Season 1) TNT Productions/TNT Prod: Rob Bragin, Jessica Grasi, Rose Lam Dir: Allison Anders HOMELAND (Seasons 1-4) Fox 21/Showtime Prod: Alex Gansa, Howard Gordon Dir: Various RAY DONOVAN (Pilot, Seasons 1-2) Showtime Prod: Ann Biderman Dir: Allen Coulter (P) Various THE KILLING (Season 2) Fox 21/AMC Prod: Veena Sud Dir: Various CHAOS (Season 1) 20th Century Fox/CBS Prod: Tom Spezialy Dir: Various MEDIUM (Seasons 3-7) CBS Studios/NBC Prod: Glenn Gordon Caron Dir: Various FEATURES BROKEN BOY SOLDIER (Short) Burnside Entertainment Prod: Seth William Meier Dir: Travis Donnelly 405 S Beverly Drive, Beverly Hills, California 90212 - T 310.888.4200 - F 310.888.4242 www.apa-agency.com .
    [Show full text]
  • Star Trek" Mary Jo Deegan University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected]
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UNL | Libraries University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Sociology Department, Faculty Publications Sociology, Department of 1986 Sexism in Space: The rF eudian Formula in "Star Trek" Mary Jo Deegan University of Nebraska-Lincoln, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub Part of the Family, Life Course, and Society Commons, and the Social Psychology and Interaction Commons Deegan, Mary Jo, "Sexism in Space: The rF eudian Formula in "Star Trek"" (1986). Sociology Department, Faculty Publications. 368. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/sociologyfacpub/368 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Sociology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Sociology Department, Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. THIS FILE CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING MATERIALS: Deegan, Mary Jo. 1986. “Sexism in Space: The Freudian Formula in ‘Star Trek.’” Pp. 209-224 in Eros in the Mind’s Eye: Sexuality and the Fantastic in Art and Film, edited by Donald Palumbo. (Contributions to the Study of Science Fiction and Fantasy, No. 21). New York: Greenwood Press. 17 Sexism in Space: The Freudian Formula in IIStar Trek" MARY JO DEEGAN Space, the final frontier. These are the voyages of the starship Enterprise, its five year mission to explore strange new worlds, to seek out new life and new civilizations, to boldly go where no man has gone before. These words, spoken at the beginning of each televised "Star Trek" episode, set the stage for the fan­ tastic future.
    [Show full text]
  • Any Gods out There? Perceptions of Religion from Star Wars and Star Trek
    Journal of Religion & Film Volume 7 Issue 2 October 2003 Article 3 October 2003 Any Gods Out There? Perceptions of Religion from Star Wars and Star Trek John S. Schultes Vanderbilt University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf Recommended Citation Schultes, John S. (2003) "Any Gods Out There? Perceptions of Religion from Star Wars and Star Trek," Journal of Religion & Film: Vol. 7 : Iss. 2 , Article 3. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol7/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UNO. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Religion & Film by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@UNO. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Any Gods Out There? Perceptions of Religion from Star Wars and Star Trek Abstract Hollywood films and eligionr have an ongoing rocky relationship, especially in the realm of science fiction. A brief comparison study of the two giants of mainstream sci-fi, Star Wars and Star Trek reveals the differing attitudes toward religion expressed in the genre. Star Trek presents an evolving perspective, from critical secular humanism to begrudging personalized faith, while Star Wars presents an ambiguous mythological foundation for mystical experience that is in more ways universal. This article is available in Journal of Religion & Film: https://digitalcommons.unomaha.edu/jrf/vol7/iss2/3 Schultes: Any Gods Out There? Science Fiction has come of age in the 21st century. From its humble beginnings, "Sci- Fi" has been used to express the desires and dreams of those generations who looked up at the stars and imagined life on other planets and space travel, those who actually saw the beginning of the space age, and those who still dare to imagine a universe with wonders beyond what we have today.
    [Show full text]
  • Word Search Bilquis (Yetide) Badaki Unite Call (972) 937-3310 © Zap2it
    Looking for a way to keep up with local news, school happenings, sports events and more? 2 x 2" ad 2 x 2" ad April 28 - May 4, 2017 We’ve got you covered! waxahachietx.com The quest for the A L Y R E L J Q A R A B V A H 2 x 3" ad S A Q I S M A U M C S H A N E Your Key P U D Y H C E A W F E L B E W To Buying Triple Crown begins T R U K A R H A F I M K O N D M A P V E W A R W G E S D B A and Selling! 2 x 3.5" ad B R O W N I N G E A K A Y U H I D O L Z T W H W I T T G K S L P U G U A B E S M B Q U I Q Q E S N Q S E E D A W E A V I U B H X I W L T E N Q O R E P I K A U K T I K M B E L D Y E S A C D T V E T A W R S I S E A B E I A D V T D E R G D U M P E H A V K E S H A D O W A N T W A M C A I L A V Y H L X Y “American Gods” on Starz (Words in parentheses not in puzzle) Shadow (Moon) (Ricky) Whittle (Neil) Gaiman Place your classified Solution on page 13 (Mr.) Wednesday (Ian) McShane Bodyguard ad in the Waxahachie Daily 2 x 3" ad Laura (Moon) (Emily) Browning Believe Light, Midlothian1 xMirror 4" ad and Mad (Sweeney) (Pablo) Schreiber Power Ellis County Trading Post! Word Search Bilquis (Yetide) Badaki Unite Call (972) 937-3310 © Zap2it The 143rd Kentucky Derby airs Saturday on NBC.
    [Show full text]
  • Materialism for the Masses: Cosmos Reboot Distorts the History of Science and Scrubs the Evidence for Intelligent Design
    CHRISTIAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE PO Box 8500, Charlotte, NC 28271 Feature Article: JAF3374 MATERIALISM FOR THE MASSES: COSMOS REBOOT DISTORTS THE HISTORY OF SCIENCE AND SCRUBS THE EVIDENCE FOR INTELLIGENT DESIGN by Casey Luskin This article first appeared in the CHRISTIAN RESEARCH JOURNAL, volume 37, number 04 (2014). For further information or to subscribe to the CHRISTIAN RESEARCH JOURNAL, go to: http://www.equip.org/christian-research-journal/. SYNOPSIS In the original 1980 Cosmos series, Carl Sagan famously declared, “The cosmos is all that is, or ever was, or ever will be.” This spring, a new thirteen-episode Cosmos series aired on Fox, aiming to bring Sagan’s materialistic message to a new generation. Hosted by atheist astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson, and executive produced by atheist comedian Seth MacFarlane and atheist Star Trek writer Brannon Braga, the series has an unhidden antireligious agenda. The Cosmos reboot has been sharply criticized—even by evolutionists—for inventing stories about religious persecution of scientists while whitewashing religion’s positive historical influence on science. It promotes “unguided” and “mindless” evolution while omitting scientific evidence that challenges neo-Darwinism or supports intelligent design. It promotes the Copernican Principle, claiming it is a “delusion” to believe Earth occupies a “privileged position.” The series seeks to inspire an atheistic scientific utopian vision of the future by throwing off the shackles of religion, and branding dissenters from the “consensus” as unthinking “deniers” who lack “scientific literacy,” and threaten human progress. Ironically, the show endorses nonconsensus views, such as panspermia and the multiverse. While the new Cosmos boasts high quality computer-generated imagery and offers lucid explanations of uncontroversial scientific topics, it was created by celebrity CRI Web: www.equip.org Tel: 704.887.8200 Fax:704.887.8299 atheists seeking to advance a materialistic worldview and public policies consistent with their ideology.
    [Show full text]
  • The Human Adventure Is Just Beginning Visions of the Human Future in Star Trek: the Next Generation
    AMERICAN UNIVERSITY HONORS CAPSTONE The Human Adventure is Just Beginning Visions of the Human Future in Star Trek: The Next Generation Christopher M. DiPrima Advisor: Patrick Thaddeus Jackson General University Honors, Spring 2010 Table of Contents Basic Information ........................................................................................................................2 Series.......................................................................................................................................2 Films .......................................................................................................................................2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................3 How to Interpret Star Trek ........................................................................................................ 10 What is Star Trek? ................................................................................................................. 10 The Electro-Treknetic Spectrum ............................................................................................ 11 Utopia Planitia ....................................................................................................................... 12 Future History ....................................................................................................................... 20 Political Theory ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing the Rhetoric of JFK's Inaugural Address
    Analyzing the Rhetoric of JFK’s Inaugural Address Topic: John F. Kennedy’s Inaugural Address Grade Level: 9-12 Subject Area: English Language Arts Time Required: 1-2 class periods Goals/Rationale An inaugural address is a speech for a very specific event—being sworn into the office of the presidency. The speeches of modern presidents share some commonalities in referencing American history, the importance of the occasion, and hope for the future. Each president, however, has faced the particular challenges of his time and put his own distinctive rhetorical stamp on the address. In the course of writing this address, John F. Kennedy and Theodore Sorensen, his advisor and main speechwriter, asked for and received suggestions from advisors and colleagues. (To see the telegram from Ted Sorensen dated December 23, 1960, visit http://tinyurl.com/6xm5m9w.) In his delivered speech, Kennedy included several sections of text provided by both John Kenneth Galbraith, an economics professor at Harvard University and Adlai Stevenson, former governor of Illinois and Democratic presidential candidate in 1952 and 1956. In this lesson plan, students consider the rhetorical devices in the address JFK delivered on January 20, 1961. They then analyze the suggestions made by Galbraith and Stevenson and compare them to the delivered version of the speech. Students then evaluate the impact of the changes on the resonance of the speech. Essential Question: How can the use of rhetorical devices enhance a speech? Objectives Students will: identify rhetorical terms and methods. examine the rhetorical devices of JFK’s inaugural address. analyze the effects of the rhetorical devices on the delivered speech.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nuclear Taboo Paradox: Destabilizing Consequences of the Norm
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 4-2012 The Nuclear Taboo Paradox: Destabilizing Consequences of the Norm Andrew Bryan Bessler College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the International Relations Commons Recommended Citation Bessler, Andrew Bryan, "The Nuclear Taboo Paradox: Destabilizing Consequences of the Norm" (2012). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 489. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/489 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Andrew Bessler CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION Following the 1972 Easter Offensive, President Nixon is recorded discussing the nuclear option with Kissinger, stating that he would rather use the nuclear bomb against a strategic target than conventionally bomb Vietnam’s dike system. A nuclear attack on a different site, Nixon mused, would likely kill less Vietnamese than the proposed conventional bombing yet create a powerful “psychological” impact on the Soviets and the North Vietnamese.1 A few days later, Nixon observed to Kissinger that “the only place where you and I disagree…is with regard to the [nuclear] bombing. You’re so goddamned concerned about the civilians and I don’t give a damn. I don’t care.” Kissinger responded, “I’m concerned about the civilians because I don’t want the world to be mobilized against you as a butcher.”2 This exchange is a curious one, at least for advocates of traditional realist theories of nuclear deterrence and mutually assured destruction (MAD).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27
    Case 2:15-cv-09938-RGK-E Document 1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 1 of 19 Page ID #:1 1 LOEB & LOEB LLP DAVID GROSSMAN (SBN 211326) 2 [email protected] JENNIFER JASON (SBN 274142) 3 [email protected] 10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 2200 4 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Telephone: 310.282.2000 5 Facsimile: 310.282.2200 6 LOEB & LOEB LLP JONATHAN ZAVIN (pro hac vice pending) 7 [email protected] 345 Park Avenue 8 New York, NY 10154 Telephone: 212.407.4000 9 Facsimile: 212.407.4990 10 Attorneys for Plaintiffs PARAMOUNT PICTURES 11 CORPORATION and CBS STUDIOS INC. 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 PARAMOUNT PICTURES Case No.: __________ CORPORATION, a Delaware 17 corporation; and CBS STUDIOS INC., a Delaware corporation, COMPLAINT FOR: 18 1. COPYRIGHT Plaintiffs, INFRINGEMENT; 19 2. CONTRIBUTORY v. COPYRIGHT 20 INFRINGEMENT AXANAR PRODUCTIONS, INC., a 3. VICARIOUS COPYRIGHT 21 California corporation; ALEC PETERS, INFRINGEMENT; AND an individual, and DOES 1-20, 4. DECLARATORY 22 JUDGMENT Defendants. 23 DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL 24 25 26 27 28 Loeb & Loeb LA2466220.9 A Limited Liability Partnership COMPLAINT Including Professional 202828-10048 Corporations Case 2:15-cv-09938-RGK-E Document 1 Filed 12/29/15 Page 2 of 19 Page ID #:2 1 Plaintiffs Paramount Pictures Corporation (“Paramount”) and CBS Studios 2 Inc. (“CBS”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), by their attorneys, hereby bring this 3 complaint against Axanar Productions, Inc. (“AP”), Alec Peters (“Peters”), and 4 Does 1-20 (collectively, “Defendants”), and allege as follows: 5 NATURE OF THE ACTION 6 1.
    [Show full text]
  • FOX and National Geographic Release Exclusive First Look at Highly Anticipated “COSMOS: POSSIBLE WORLDS” at San Diego Comic-Con 2018
    FOX and National Geographic release exclusive first look at highly anticipated “COSMOS: POSSIBLE WORLDS” at San Diego Comic-Con 2018 Executive Producer, Writer, Director and Creator Ann Druyan; Executive Producers Seth MacFarlane, Brannon Braga and Jason Clark; and Renowned Astrophysicist and Host Neil deGrasse Tyson Shared the Sneak Peek with San Diego Comic-Con Attendees during Panel New Season of COSMOS to Premiere in March 2019; 13-Part Series to be Broadcast Worldwide across National Geographic and in the US on FOX and National Geographic HONG KONG, JULY 24, 2018 – FOX and National Geographic today released a first look at the highly anticipated return of the Emmy Award-winning worldwide phenomenon COSMOS. Executive producer/writer/director Ann Druyan (who won an Emmy Award for writing the 2014 series and a Peabody Award for producing it) and executive producers Seth MacFarlane (FAMILY GUY, THE ORVILLE, “COSMOS: A SpaceTime Odyssey”), Brannon Braga (THE ORVILLE, “COSMOS: A SpaceTime Odyssey,” “Terra Nova”) and Jason Clark (THE ORVILLE, “COSMOS: A SpaceTime Odyssey”), along with series host Neil deGrasse Tyson, the famed pop-culture icon, astrophysicist and host of the Emmy Award-nominated “StarTalk,” were all on hand to share the sneak peek during their panel at San Diego Comic-Con 2018. COSMOS: POSSIBLE WORLDS is set to premiere on FOX and National Geographic in March 2019. Watch/share the sneak peek here: https://youtu.be/mXako3rIAr8 Following a wildly successful run in 2014 as the most-watched series ever on National Geographic Channels internationally, and seen by more than 135 million people worldwide on National Geographic and FOX, the new season will once again premiere in the U.S.
    [Show full text]