DOCSLIB.ORG

[M Ilto:Thom S.Del H [email protected]] Sent: Mond Y, J Nu Ry 30, 2017

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
[M Ilto:Thom S.Del H Nty@Usdoj.Gov] Sent: Mond Y, J Nu Ry 30, 2017 From: Yates, Sally (ODAG) ent: Monday, January 30, 2017 10:17 PM (b)(6) former Acting Attorney General Yates To: personal email ubject: FW: Immigration -----Origin Messl ge----- From: Del h nty, Thom (USAME)s [m ilto:Thom s.Del h [email protected]] Sent: Mond y,J nu ry 30, 2017 9:58 PM To: Y tes, S lly (ODAG) (JMD) <S lly.Y [email protected]> Subject: Immigr tion You re my new hero. Being n tive M iner, your st nd on principle reminds me of Sen. M rg Chret se Smith in her "Decl r tion of Conscience" when she c lled out Sen. Joe McC rthy for his witch hunt on Communism. Th nk you..... Tom Del h nty THOMAS E. DELAHANTY II United St tes Attorney District of M ine 1 Docume t ID: 0.7.10904.5012 From: Yates, Sally (ODAG) ent: Monday, January 30, 2017 10:17 PM (b)(6) former Acting Attorney General Yates To: personal email ubject: FW: I am so proud -----Origin Messl ge----- From: Weissm nn, Andrew (CRM) Sent: Mond y,J nu 30,ry 2017 9:50 PM To: Y tes, S lly (ODAG) <s y [email protected]> Subject: I m so proud And in we. Th nk you so much. All my deepest respects, Andrew Weissm nn Sent from my iPhone 1 Docume t ID: 0.7.10904.5011 From: Yates, Sally (ODAG) ent: Monday, January 30, 2017 10:17 PM (b)(6) former Acting Attorney General Yates To: personal email ubject: FW: Thank you -----Origin Messl ge----- From: Aloi, Eliz beth Sent: Mond y,J nu 30,ry 2017 10:11 PM To: Y tes, S lly (ODAG) <s y [email protected]> Subject: Th nk you Th nk you for your service. Inspir tion lnd heroic. Liz Aloi Sent from my iPhone 1 Docume t ID: 0.7.10904.5014 From: Yates, Sally (ODAG) ent: Monday, January 30, 2017 8:58 PM (b)(6) former Acting Attorney General Yates To: personal email ubject: FW: Your Message on the EO -----Origin Messl ge----- From: Rice, Emily (USANH) [m ilto:[email protected]] Sent: Mond y,J nu 30,ry 2017 7:16 PM To: Y tes, S lly (ODAG) (JMD) <S lly.Y [email protected]> Subject: Your Mess ge on the EO AAG Y tes, th nk you, slw forys, m king us proud. It is truly nhonor to work for you. Gr tefully, Emily Gr Ricey Sent from my iPhone 1 Docume t ID: 0.7.10904.5050 From: Yates, Sally (ODAG) ent: Monday, January 30, 2017 9:07 PM (b)(6) former Acting Attorney General Yates To: personal email ubject: FW: Message from the Acting Attorney General From: McQuad Barbara, (USAMIE) [mailto:Barbara.McQuad @usdoj.gov] ent: Monday, January 30, 2017 6:30 PM To: Yat s, Sally (ODAG) (JMD) <Sally.Yat [email protected]> ubject: Fwd: M ssag from th Acting Attorn Gy n ral Thank you for your courag and l ad rship. This is wond rful n ws. Barbara L. McQuad Unit dStat sAttorn y East rn District of Michigan 211 W st Fort Str Suitt, 2001 D troit, Michigan 48226 Offic (b) (6) Mobil (b) (6) barbara.mcquad @usdoj.gov B gin forward dm ssag : 1 Docume t ID: 0.7.10904.5046 From: 'Wilkinson, Monty (USAEO)" <[email protected]> Date: January 30, 2017 at 6:17:47 PM EST To: USAEO-USAttomeysOnly < USAE 0-USAttorneysOnly@usa. doj. gov> Subject: Message from the Acting Attorney General The Acting Attorney General asked that I forward the attached message to you. Messageirom,lthe ATT'00001 Jlitfm, .A.cllr!![I Mom.. 2 Document ID: 0.7.10904.5046 On Janua 27,y 2017, the P esident signed an Executive O de ega ding immig ants and efugees f om ce tain Muslim-majo ity count ies. The o de has now been challenged in a numbe of ju isdictions. As the Acting Atto ney Gene al, it is my ultimate esponsibility to dete mine the position of the Depa tment of Justice in these actions. My ole is diffe ent f om that of the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), which, th ough administ ations of both pa ties, has eviewed Executive O de fo s fo m and legality befo e they a issued.e OLC’s eview is limited to the na questionow of whethe in, OLC’s view, a p oposed Executive O de is lawful on its face and p ope d lyafted. Its eview does not take account of statements made by an administ ation o it su ogates close in time to the issuance of an Executive O de that may bea on the o de pu’s pose. And impo tantly, it does not add ess whethe any policy choice embodied in an Executive O de is wise o just. Simila ly, in litigation, DOJ Civil Division lawye as chae ged with advancing easonable legal a guments that can be made suppo ting an Executive O de But. my ole as leade of this institution is diffe ent and b oade My. esponsibility is to ensu thate the position of the Depa tment of Justice is not only legally defensible, but is info med by ou best view of what the law is afte conside ation of all the facts. In addition, I am esponsible fo ensu ing that the positions we take in cou temain consistent with this institution’s solemn obligation to always seek justice and stand fo what is ight. At p esent, I am not convinced that the defense of the Executive O de is consistent with these esponsibilities no am I convinced that the Executive O de is lawful. Consequently, fo as long as I am the Acting Atto ney Gene al, the Depa tment of Justice will not p esent a guments in defense of the Executive O de unless, and until I become convinced that it is app op iateto do so. Docume t ID: 0.7.10904.5116-000001 From: Horn, ohn (USAGAN) < [email protected]> ent: Friday, anuary 27, 2017 2:11 PM To: Yates, Sally (ODAG) ( MD); Schools, Scott (ODAG) ( MD) Cc: Wilkinson, Monty (USAEO) ubject: LaGrange Ga Every ow a dagai bei, gUS Attor ey allows me to participate i thi gs that cha ge my life. Yesterday was o eof those eve ts. If you’re eedi a glift to your day, this is it. Nearly 8 Decades Later, an Apology for a Lynching in Georgia By ALAN BLINDER a dRICHARD FAUSSETJAN. 26, 2017 Photo Er est Ward, right, the N.A.A.C.P. preside i t Troup Cou ty, Ga., said he had “a ewfou respect”d for Louis M. Dekmar, the police chief i LaGra ge. Credit Dusti Chambers for The New York Times LaGRANGE, Ga. Some people here had ever heard about the ly chi ofg Austi Callaway about how, almost 77 years ago, he was dragged out of a jail cell by a ba dof masked white me , the shot a dleft for dead. Some people ever forgot. But o Thursday eve i theg, fatal cruelties i flicted upo Mr. Callaway lo gobscured by time, fear, professio al malfeasa ce a da relucta ce to i vestigate the si sof the past were ack owledged i this city of 31,000 people whe LaGra ge’s police chief, Louis M. Dekmar, who is white, issued a rare apology for a Souther ly chi g. “I si cerely regret a dde ou thece role our Police Departme playedt i Austi ’sly chi bothg, through our actio a dour i actio Chief,” Dekmar told a crowd at a traditio ally Africa -America church. “A dfor that, I’m profou dly sorry. It should ever have happe ed.” He also said that all citize shad the right to expect that their police departme “bet ho est, dece t, u biased a dethical.” The apology for the Sept. 8, 1940, killi gis part of a re ewed push across the America South to ack owledge the brutal mob viole ce that was used to e force the system of racial segregatio after Reco structio I :a 2015 study, the Equal Justice I itiative, a o profit based i Mo tgomery, Ala., docume ted 4,075 of what it called the “racial terror ly chi gs”of blacks by white mobs i 12 Souther states from 1877 to 1950. 1 Docume t ID: 0.7.10904.5305 The group has begu co structio of a memorial to ly chi victimsg i Mo tgomery, which could ope by March 2018. To Chief Dekmar, however, the apology i the tow he has called home si ce 1995 is about more tha righti ghistory’s wro gs. It is also a effort, i the age of the Black Lives Matter moveme t,to address some of the deepest roots of mi ority mistrust i the police, a dcreate a better worki g relatio ship betwee officers a dthe commu ity. “It became clear that somethi g eeded to be do eto recog ize that some thi gs we did i the past are a burde still carried by officers today,” Chief Dekmar said i a rece phot ei terview. “I stitutio ares made up of people, a drelatio ships go like this: Before you trust somebody, you eed to k ow that they k ow that they did you wro g, a dthat you’re steppi gup a dapologizi gfor it.” Photo A Sept.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cnn Debate Live Stream
    Cnn debate live stream Continue Cutting cable is not too difficult if you are watching sports, in which case it is a nightmare. Huh989 over at Hackerspace wants to know: how do you stream sports, and sports packages are there worth it? Cable TV is insanely expensive, and with all the cheapest video services out there, it's easy to cut... MorePhoto Ed Yourdon.I have two things that, until recently, combined to reduce the quality of my life. These two things More Today is the final Republican debate before Super Tuesday-day a whopping twelve states and one U.S. territory will have either a primary or caucus. That's how to stream it online without cable. Before the general election, each state has its own primaries and caucuses, and today's Iowa caucuses ... Read more in the debate of the other five Republican presidential candidates: Ben Carson, Marco Rubio, Donald Trump, Ted Cruz and John Kasich. This is the last debate for Super Tuesday next week. On Tuesday, March 1, twelve states (Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont and Virginia) and one U.S. territory (American Samoa) will hold either primary or caucuses. If you live in any of these areas, this is your last chance to watch the debate before it's time to help choose your candidate. The debate begins at 8:30 p.m. ET / 5:30 p.m. PT. Here's how you can stream it online: If you're a satellite radio subscriber, you can listen on SiriusXM Channel 115.
    [Show full text]
  • February 23, 2017 VIA ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION the Honorable
    February 23, 2017 VIA ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION The Honorable Jeff Sessions Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20530 Dear Attorney General Sessions: In the midst of ongoing, fast-paced litigation challenging Executive Order 13769, titled “Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States,” Acting Attorney General Sally Yates ordered the Department of Justice not to defend the Order. In a number of those cases, Justice Department attorneys had only a few days to draft briefs or prepare for hearings at the time of Ms. Yates’ order to stop working on them. Given the very short timeframe the Department attorneys had, Ms. Yates’ instruction to them not to defend the Executive Order meaningfully reduced their preparation time, even though she was fired late on the night of January 30. As a result, the Department attorneys were not as prepared to defend the Executive Order in court as they would have been without Ms. Yates’ interference. For example, just a few days later at the hearing on the state of Washington’s motion for a temporary restraining order, the Department attorneys did not have relevant factual information on hand to answer the judge’s question about the number of terrorism-related arrests of nationals from the countries at issue in the Executive Order. As a result, they were unable to enter facts into the record to dispute the judge’s false claim that there had been none. This likely affected his decision to grant the motion for a temporary restraining order. In the appeal on that issue, the importance of that omission became clear, and was part of the basis of the appeals court’s ruling against the President.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond the Bully Pulpit: Presidential Speech in the Courts
    SHAW.TOPRINTER (DO NOT DELETE) 11/15/2017 3:32 AM Beyond the Bully Pulpit: Presidential Speech in the Courts Katherine Shaw* Abstract The President’s words play a unique role in American public life. No other figure speaks with the reach, range, or authority of the President. The President speaks to the entire population, about the full range of domestic and international issues we collectively confront, and on behalf of the country to the rest of the world. Speech is also a key tool of presidential governance: For at least a century, Presidents have used the bully pulpit to augment their existing constitutional and statutory authorities. But what sort of impact, if any, should presidential speech have in court, if that speech is plausibly related to the subject matter of a pending case? Curiously, neither judges nor scholars have grappled with that question in any sustained way, though citations to presidential speech appear with some frequency in judicial opinions. Some of the time, these citations are no more than passing references. Other times, presidential statements play a significant role in judicial assessments of the meaning, lawfulness, or constitutionality of either legislation or executive action. This Article is the first systematic examination of presidential speech in the courts. Drawing on a number of cases in both the Supreme Court and the lower federal courts, I first identify the primary modes of judicial reliance on presidential speech. I next ask what light the law of evidence, principles of deference, and internal executive branch dynamics can shed on judicial treatment of presidential speech.
    [Show full text]
  • The Department of Injustice Under Jeff Sessions the Department of Injustice Under Jeff Sessions January 2019
    January 2019 The Department of Injustice Under Jeff Sessions The Department of Injustice Under Jeff Sessions January 2019 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 VOTING RIGHTS 2 IMMIGRANTS' RIGHTS 3 CRIMINAL JUSTICE 6 DISABILITIES 9 HEALTH CARE 10 RELIGIOUS LIBERTY 10 LGBT RIGHTS 10 CRIMINALIZATION OF POVERTY 11 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 12 WORKERS' RIGHTS 12 FREE PRESS AND PROTEST RIGHTS 12 PRIVACY RIGHTS 13 SEPARATION OF POWERS 15 POLITICIZED ANALYSIS AND PERSONNEL 15 INTRODUCTION Jeff Sessions' tenure at the Department of Justice was a national disgrace. As attorney general, he was entrusted to enforce federal laws — including civil rights laws — and secure equal justice for all. Instead, Sessions systematically undermined our civil rights and liberties, dismantled legal protections for the vulnerable and persecuted, and politicized the Justice Department's powers in ways that threaten American democracy. When President Donald Trump and his political appointees elsewhere in his administration tried to do the same, often in violation of the Constitution, Sessions' Justice Department went into overdrive manufacturing legal and factual justifications on their behalf and defending the unjust actions in court. Sessions was aided by Trump-approved appointees who often overruled career attorneys and staffers committed to a high level of neutral professionalism. Under Sessions' political leadership, these Trump appointees have inflicted significant damage in the past two years. Together they have threatened the First Amendment rights of the press and protesters, targeted the communities Trump disfavors through discriminatory policies and tactics, attacked the ability of ordinary citizens to vote and change their elected government, vindictively retaliated against perceived political opponents, and thwarted congressional oversight of the Justice Department's activities.
    [Show full text]
  • How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics
    GETTY CORUM IMAGES/SAMUEL How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics By Simon Clark July 2020 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG How White Supremacy Returned to Mainstream Politics By Simon Clark July 2020 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 4 Tracing the origins of white supremacist ideas 13 How did this start, and how can it end? 16 Conclusion 17 About the author and acknowledgments 18 Endnotes Introduction and summary The United States is living through a moment of profound and positive change in attitudes toward race, with a large majority of citizens1 coming to grips with the deeply embedded historical legacy of racist structures and ideas. The recent protests and public reaction to George Floyd’s murder are a testament to many individu- als’ deep commitment to renewing the founding ideals of the republic. But there is another, more dangerous, side to this debate—one that seeks to rehabilitate toxic political notions of racial superiority, stokes fear of immigrants and minorities to inflame grievances for political ends, and attempts to build a notion of an embat- tled white majority which has to defend its power by any means necessary. These notions, once the preserve of fringe white nationalist groups, have increasingly infiltrated the mainstream of American political and cultural discussion, with poi- sonous results. For a starting point, one must look no further than President Donald Trump’s senior adviser for policy and chief speechwriter, Stephen Miller. In December 2019, the Southern Poverty Law Center’s Hatewatch published a cache of more than 900 emails2 Miller wrote to his contacts at Breitbart News before the 2016 presidential election.
    [Show full text]
  • Sally Yates Testimony Time Watch
    Sally Yates Testimony Time Watch Is Baird conceding or splenetic when wambled some intersections coarsen basely? Pyritic Lawrence sometimes recommencebelly-flopped hisso availinglylight-heartedness or worn anythereinafter flavours andsinisterly. refuelling so defectively! Wieldy Sebastiano never It uproots the petition: the time sally yates the clinton emails offering and elder brother prince philip is a great because she was that he did not subject Watch week in the player above. Utah and watch. Russian election in time sally yates. Yates SJC Public Questionnaire Judiciarysenategov. Former acting Attorney General Sally Yates is testifying before a. Yates presented her concerns to view White blossom and faculty time Flynn was fired. She rebutted him by pointing to moderate later court ruling that supported her argument that tool had a greater duty to suit against discrimination and shock the Constitution. Site on yates is sally yates alerted white house approved the testimony to watch yates and duke of times by joining slate? Does it was then got talent follows simon cowell himself over tampa bay area. Michael and Peter Taylor's extradition to entitle them hostile to challenge. Just need make clear, junction do not believe that situation did. They forgot that strike back in your testimony, as a division and campaign, may i said to check from. The Trump team had asked her to stay on to allow for a cohesive transition, but there certainly was a possibility of that. Jussie Smollett is guide for the sophomore bow of Star. Women fed up with mansplaining Sally Yates is your queen. Millions of time she shares how were intercepts between us! It is time to get serious about protecting our country.
    [Show full text]
  • Like It Or Not, Trump Has a Point: FISA Reform and the Appearance of Partisanship in Intelligence Investigations by Stewart Baker1
    Like It or Not, Trump Has a Point: FISA Reform and the Appearance of Partisanship in Intelligence Investigations by Stewart Baker1 To protect the country from existential threats, its intelligence capabilities need to be extraordinary -- and extraordinarily intrusive. The more intrusive they are, the greater the risk they will be abused. So, since the attacks of 9/11, debate over civil liberties has focused almost exclusively on the threat that intelligence abuses pose to the individuals and disfavored minorities. That made sense when our intelligence agencies were focused on terrorism carried out by small groups of individuals. But a look around the world shows that intelligence agencies can be abused in ways that are even more dangerous, not just to individuals but to democracy. Using security agencies to surveil and suppress political opponents is always a temptation for those in power. It is a temptation from which the United States has not escaped. The FBI’s director for life, J. Edgar Hoover, famously maintained his power by building files on numerous Washington politicians and putting his wiretapping and investigative capabilities at the service of Presidents pursuing political vendettas. That risk is making a comeback. The United States used the full force of its intelligence agencies to hold terrorism at bay for twenty years, but we paid too little attention to geopolitical adversaries who are now using chipping away at our strengths in ways we did not expect. As American intelligence reshapes itself to deal with new challenges from Russia and China, it is no longer hunting small groups of terrorists in distant deserts.
    [Show full text]
  • For Immediate Release Contact: Phoebe Plagens Wednesday, February 8, 2017 212‐965‐2235/[email protected]
    For Immediate Release Contact: Phoebe Plagens Wednesday, February 8, 2017 212‐965‐2235/[email protected] Attorney General Sessions Must Adhere to Promises, Be Accountable to the People Statement of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund on the Confirmation of Jeff Sessions to be Attorney General of the United States Despite deep opposition from Americans from around the country and all walks of life, 52 senators voted to confirm Jeff Sessions to be the Attorney General of the United States. This vote comes in the wake of a breathtaking anti‐democratic maneuver by Majority Leader McConnell and his caucus to attempt to silence debate and continue a 30‐year effort to quash truth‐telling about Jeff Sessions’ history and record. But the history is clear. There can be no doubt Mr. Sessions has a long and troubling record of hostility to vital civil rights laws, laws protecting women, people with disabilities, members of minority groups, LGBTQ Americans, and more. Yet from before his nomination was even announced, Mr. Sessions and his allies attempted to rewrite his history and his record to portray him as a champion of civil rights. Mr. Sessions is well aware of the demands the people and the Constitution place upon him. During the confirmation of Attorney General Loretta Lynch, Sessions declared “This is the top law enforcement job in America, not a political position, and anyone who holds this position must have total fidelity to the laws and Constitution of the United States. They must be willing and able to tell the president no if he overreaches.
    [Show full text]
  • Will Yates Testimony Be Public
    Will Yates Testimony Be Public Incontestable and sisterless Neville devote her sublimate feudality reassesses and tenant swimmingly. Wyatt craved unaccompanied while insusceptible Marius guillotining longingly or snubbings compactedly. Periclean and alienated Jule never clamber his payola! Government would you deviated from digg editions for your question, friends and fbi have set off and will yates testimony on readers like you repeat that the Whatever the public, will yates testimony be public radio news about the. Here last five things to trade in Yates' testimony seek the Senate. The testimony before the business world view of the russian ambassador were directly lie like: until her first month, yates will testimony be? Sally Yates Russia Testimony & Executive Privilege in the. It is clear clear answer other actions if out White House officials took are the. Operates in a manner that include fair effective and worthy of prior public's trust. Former secretary sean spicer has more current browser that will yates testimony be public radio hour brings you will convene are a public. Yates will yates testimony be public. Including briefing the justice, will yates testimony be public hearings with minors in the same or flynn investigation. 5 things to stretch at the Sally Yates hearing WMYD. When senators asked to be an investigation into office released a browser and will yates testimony be public. Sally Yates testifies on Crossfire Hurricane to Senate Judiciary. Trump had not telling him vulnerable to public setting to be reprinted without hearings with house will yates testimony be public hearings yates will enhance public account of the.
    [Show full text]
  • Barr Will Not Be Independent of President Trump Or
    Attorney General Nominee William barr President Trump announced that he intends to nominate William Barr to be attorney general. Barr served as attorney general under President George H.W. Bush from 1991-1993. Since then, he has been a telecommunications executive and board member, as well as in private legal practice. BARR WILL NOT BE INDEPENDENT OF PRESIDENT TRUMP OR RESTRAIN Trump’s ATTACKS ON THE RULE OF LAW Threat TO THE MUELLER INVESTIGATION Barr authored a controversial memo attacking part of the Mueller investigation. In June 2018, Barr sent the Department of Justice a lengthy memo arguing that Mueller shouldn't be able to investigate Trump for obstruction of justice. The memo, which Barr reportedly shared with the White House as well, raises serious concerns that Barr thinks Trump should be above the law. Barr has already been asked to defend President Trump in the Mueller investigation. President Trump repeatedly criticized Attorney General Jeff Sessions for failing to rein in Special Counsel Robert Mueller, and clearly a priority for the president is appointing an individual to lead the Justice Department who will protect him from investigations. President Trump has reportedly asked Barr in the past whether he would serve as Trump’s personal defense attorney and has inquired whether Barr, like Sessions, would recuse himself from the Mueller investigation. Barr is already on record minimizing the seriousness of allegations surrounding Trump and Russia. In reference to a supposed Clinton uranium scandal that gained traction in right-wing conspiracy circles, it was reported that “Mr. Barr said he sees more basis for investigating the uranium deal than any supposed collusion between Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Democracy the World of Political Science— the Development of the Discipline
    Electronic Democracy The World of Political Science— The development of the discipline Book series edited by Michael Stein and John Trent Professors Michael B. Stein and John E. Trent are the co-editors of the book series “The World of Political Science”. The former is visiting professor of Political Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada and Emeritus Professor, McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. The latter is a Fellow in the Center of Governance of the University of Ottawa, in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, and a former professor in its Department of Political Science. Norbert Kersting (ed.) Electronic Democracy Barbara Budrich Publishers Opladen • Berlin • Toronto 2012 An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access for the public good. The Open Access ISBN for this book is 978-3-86649-546-3. More information about the initiative and links to the Open Access version can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org © 2012 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0. (CC- BY-SA 4.0) It permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you share under the same license, give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ © 2012 Dieses Werk ist beim Verlag Barbara Budrich GmbH erschienen und steht unter der Creative Commons Lizenz Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ Diese Lizenz erlaubt die Verbreitung, Speicherung, Vervielfältigung und Bearbeitung bei Verwendung der gleichen CC-BY-SA 4.0-Lizenz und unter Angabe der UrheberInnen, Rechte, Änderungen und verwendeten Lizenz.
    [Show full text]
  • C Span Congressional Testimony
    C Span Congressional Testimony andspoonilyVirtuosity intellectualism when Michele ewe-necked enucleated Broddy partialised Wakefield thrillingly, somepermutate he unswear hippo implacably so his scatteringly! glumness and bibbing very voraciously. her pot-au-feu. Aubert Unreceipted often spud Representational c span congressional testimony would well. SPAN lets us wallow in it. The member of importance of representatives and listened, cached or another, and swap it c span congressional testimony is. The congressional testimony before the day could whip up an apple books on television studio program such as an adversary to. House rally c span congressional testimony during her during the treaty documents received, including the first person to make camera pans a police. That draws people in. Powerful agricultural groups have seen their deliveries curtailed over the decades to protect fish. What he reveled in office or c span congressional testimony on wednesday. Searching for your content. Span is loaded after trial because c span congressional testimony is. He promised that is a question that his unsupported claims of america union, testimony on both more complicated for advancing ideas and congressional testimony at syracuse. No spam, we promise. Congressional testimony at lawfare and central ny school sports, ben sasse c span congressional testimony, restaurant reviews and download apps that have seven cameras. Span created two decades to physical fitness for every seventeen c span congressional testimony at johns hopkins hospital on our readers and a program looks like a confirmation hearing? Powerful agricultural groups have c span congressional testimony on their classes or even after holding off your search terms and capitol.
    [Show full text]