DOCSLIB.ORG

VIA HAND DELIVERY Sandra Squire Executive Secretary Public Service Commission 201 Brooks Street Charleston, WV 25301 Re: Caseno

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
VIA HAND DELIVERY Sandra Squire Executive Secretary Public Service Commission 201 Brooks Street Charleston, WV 25301 Re: Caseno THOMASN. HANNA Attorney at Law 1206 VIRGINIA STREET, EAST, SUITE 201 CHARLESTON, WV 25301 MAILING ADDRESS: TELEPHONE (304)342-1687 P. 0. BOX3967 March 10,2006 FAX (304)342-8761 CHARLESTON, wv 25339 e-mail: thannalawQcharter.net VIA HAND DELIVERY Sandra Squire Executive Secretary Public Service Commission 201 Brooks Street Charleston, WV 25301 Re: CaseNo. 06aL046 Sprint Long Distance, Inc., a corporation. Application for consent and approval to transfer control of Sprint Long Distance, Inc., from Sprint Nextel Corporation to Embarq Corporation. Dear Ms. Squire: On behalf of Sprint Long Distance, Inc., a corporation, I hand you herewith for filing the original and twelve (12) copies of their Application for consent and approval to transfer control of Sprint Long Distance, Inc., from Sprint Nextel Corporation to Embarq Corporation. Please note that expedited action in this filing is requested upon approval of Sprint Long Distance’s application for a certificate to provide resold intrastate interexchange telecommunications services within West Virginia, which application was filed simultaneously herewith. If you need anything further, please let me know. Thomas N. Hanna WV State Bar # 1581 TNH/th Enclosure cc: B. Atkinson, Esq. PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON PETITION OF ) 1 SPRINT LONG DISTANCE, INC. 1 FOR THE CONSENT AND APPROVAL TO 1 TRANSFER CONTROL OF 1 Case No. SPRINT LONG DISTANCE, INC. FROM SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION TO 1 EMBARQ CORPORATION EXPEDITED APPLICATION FOR AUTHORIZATION FOR TRANSFER OF CONTROL Comes now the above-named Sprint Long Distance, Inc. (“SLDI” or “petitioner”), petitioner herein, and through counsel respectfully shows the Commission as follows: 1. That the name and address of the petitioner are: Sprint Long Distance, Inc. 6200 Sprint Parkway Overland Park, Kansas 6625 1 Correspondence regarding this application should be directed to: Julie Corsig Davis Wright Tremaine LLP 1500 K Street, N.W. Suite 450 Washington, D.C. 20005 (202) 508-6628 j uliecorsin@,dwt.com Thomas N. Hanna Attorney at Law P.O. Box 3967 Charleston, WV 25339 ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~William R. Atkinson Sprint Nextel 3065 Cumberland Circle Mailstop GAATLD0 602 Atlanta, Georgia 303 39 (404) 649-4882 (0) -m -m 2. That the name and address of the utility whose property is sought to be acquired are: Sprint Long Distance, Inc. 6200 Sprint Parkway Overland Park, Kansas 6625 1 3. That the financial condition of the petitioner and of the utility whose property is sought to be acquired are: Attached as Exhibit A is a balance sheet and income statement for SLDI as of January 3 I, 2006. See Paragraph 6 below regarding the financial condition of the acquiring company, Embarq Corporation. Both SLDI, as the operating company, and Embarq Corporation, as the acquiring company, are financial capable to ensure quality services are provided to the residents of West Virginia. 4. Description of the transaction and the parties to the transaction. Commission approval is requested to transfer control of Sprint Long Distance, Inc. from its current parent company, Sprint Nextel Corporation (“Sprint Nextel”), to Embarq Corporation (“Embarq”). Petitioner requests expedited Commission approval of the proposed transaction no later than April 17,2006. The following is a description of the entities involved in the proposed transaction: Sprint Nextel Corporation. Sprint Nextel is a publicly-traded Kansas corporation with executive headquarters at 200 1 Edmund Halley Drive, Reston, Virginia 201 91 and operational 2 ~~ headquarters at 6200 Sprint Parkway, Overland Park, Kansas 6625 1.* Sprint Nextel is a global communications company providing wireless, long distance, and local communications services. Sprint Nextel’s ILECs provide a full portfolio of communications services, including local, long distance, high-speed data, wireless and video in approximately 18 states. Sprint has no ILEC operations in West Virginia. As of December 3 1,2004, Sprint Nextel’s ILEC operations served approximately 7.7 million local access lines in 18 states. Embarq Corporation. Embarq, a newly formed subsidiary of Sprint Nextel, is a Delaware corporation with its corporate headquarters in the Kansas City metropolitan area, at 5454 11 Ofh Street, Overland Park, Kansas 6621 1. Upon the transfer of control, Embarq will realize control of the Sprint ILEC entities in other states (Le., not in West Virginia) as well as SLDI in West Virginia. At that time, Embarq will operate independently from Sprint Nextel and will have its own management team and board of directors. Upon the separation from Sprint Nextel, Embarq is expected to be a NYSE-listed company with approximately $6 billion in annual revenues, rank among the Fortune 500 and serve as the fifth largest local communications company in the United States based on the company’s 7.4 million access lines as of September 30,2005. The company will provide a suite of communications services, consisting of local and long distance voice and data services, including high-speed Internet access. Sprint Long Distance, Inc. SLDI is a Delaware corporation with principal offices located at 6200 Sprint Parkway, Overland Park, Kansas 6625 1. SLDI is currently a wholly-owned ~~ On December 15,2004, Sprint Corporation and Nextel Communications, Inc. (Nextel) entered into a merger agreement pursuant to which, upon obtaining requisite Sprint and Nextel stockholder approval and satisfaction of the other conditions to the merger, Nextel would merge with and into a wholly owned subsidiary of Sprint. By letter filed February 16,2005, Sprint and Nextel advised this Commission of the planned merger, which did not require Commission approval. The conditions of the merger were satisfied and the merger closed on August 12,2005. The corporation’s new name is “Sprint Nextel Corporation.” In the merger agreement, Sprint and Nextel agreed to use their reasonable best efforts to separate the ILEC business of Sprint, by means of a tax-free spin-off to the then-existing stockholders of Sprint Nextel. 3 subsidiary-of~ Sprint Nextel. On March 10,2006, Sprint Long Distance, Inc. filed an Application for a Certificate of Convenience and Necessity to provide intrastate interexchange services in West Virginia. SLDI anticipates receiving its authorization to provide interexchange services in West Virginia in April, 2006. As discussed herein, SLDI has been created for the purpose of providing intrastate interexchange services for the customers of Embarq’s ILECs that have multi- state locations/offices (including in West Virginia). This transfer of control application is being filed in anticipation of SLDI receiving its authorization to provide services in West Virginia prior to the transfer of control taking place. 5. Terms and conditions of transfer and copy of any agreements. Sprint Nexte12 intends to separate its wireline local service operation into an independent, standalone operation. As part of that transaction, a new holding company, Embarq Corporation, has been created and control of the Sprint Nextel operating companies serving local customers - essentially, Sprint Nextel’s ILEC operations -- will be transferred to that holding company. The transfer of control of SLDI to Embarq is associated with, and an incidental aspect of the primary transfer of control of the Sprint Nextel ILECs (in other states) from Sprint Nextel to Embarq. For instance, SLDI is being established to provide long distance service to Embarq’s ILEC customers. Although Sprint Nextel does not have ILEC operations in West Virginia, in some cases, Sprint Nextel ILECs in other states serve business customers with multi-state offices, some of which are in West Virginia, and which require long distance services between or among On December 15,2004, Sprint Corporation and Nextel Communications, Inc. (Nextel) entered into & merger agreement pursuant to which, upon obtaining requisite Sprint and Nextel stockholder approval and satisfaction of the other conditions to the merger, Nextel would merge with and into a wholly owned subsidiary of Sprint. By letter filed February 16,2005, Sprint and Nextel advised this Cowmission of the planned merger, which did not require Commission approval. The conditions of the merger were satisfied and the merger closed on August 12,2005. The corporation’s new name is “Sprint Nextel Corporation.” In the merger agreement, Sprint and Nextel agreed to use their reasonable best efforts to separate the ILEC business of Sprint, by means of a tax-free spin-off to the then-existing stockholders of Sprint Nextel. 4 _the_offiicles._TheseSpri~~C~~usinesscustomers who have business locations in West Virginia will receive interexchange services from SLDI.3 Additional information related to the transaction is provided in paragraph 7, below. The parties consider the underlying Agreement related to the transfer of control of the entities from Sprint Nextel to Embarq to be confidential. To the extent the Commission determines that more details regarding the terms of the transaction are necessary in order to approve the transaction, Applicants will provide the Commission with relevant additional information subject, as needed, to the terms of an acceptable Protective Order. 6. The effect of the proposed transaction upon the service of the parties thereto. There will be no changes to SLDI’s operations in West Virginia nor any transfer of the operating authority held by the company. Embarq will operate independently fiom Sprint Nextel and will have its own management team and board of directors.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Improving Public Safety Communications in the 800 Mhz Band; Consolidating the 900 Mhz Industrial/Land Transportation and Business Pool Channels, WT Docket No
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 04-168 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Improving Public Safety Communications in the ) 800 MHz Band ) WT Docket 02-55 ) Consolidating the 800 and 900 MHz ) Industrial/Land Transportation and Business Pool ) Channels ) ) ET Docket No. 00-258 Amendment of Part 2 of the Commission’s Rules ) to Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHz for Mobile ) and Fixed Services to Support the Introduction of ) New Advanced Wireless Services, including Third ) RM-9498 Generation Wireless Systems ) ) Petition for Rule Making of the Wireless ) Information Networks Forum Concerning the ) RM-10024 Unlicensed Personal Communications Service ) ) Petition for Rule Making of UT Starcom, Inc., ) Concerning the Unlicensed Personal ) ET Docket No. 95-18 Communications Service ) ) Amendment of Section 2.106 of the Commission’s ) Rules to Allocate Spectrum at 2 GHz for use by ) the Mobile Satellite Service REPORT AND ORDER, FIFTH REPORT AND ORDER, FOURTH MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, AND ORDER Adopted: July 8, 2004 Released: August 6, 2004 By the Commission: Chairman Powell, Commissioners Abernathy, Copps, and Adelstein issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 1 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................... 8 III. MAJOR FINDINGS
    [Show full text]
  • Virgin Mobile USA Response to Commission Staffs Fi
    2000 I'NC PI ALA 500wtSl ILIILl?SONSII<L.tl 1 OUISVILI L..KY 40202-2828 DIR~C~bAX 502-333-6099 MAIN (502) 33<-6000 doughs brcnt@skolirm corn I AS (502) 333-6090 www skolirni coni May 2,201 1 Jeffrey LleKouen Executive Director Kentucky Public Service Coinmission 21 1 Sower Boulevard P.O. BOX615 Frankfort, KY 40601 RE: The Petition qf Virgin Mobile USA, L.P. jor Designation us an Eligible Telecommunications Currier in the Commonwealth oj'Kentucky Llear Mr. DeRouen: Enclosed please find the original and ten copies of Virgin Mobile USA, L.P.'s Response to Coinmission Staff's First Data Requests. A verification will be filed separately. Please indicate receipt of this filing by placing your file stamp on the extra copy and returning to me via our runner. Sincerely yours, J1- Douglas F. Brent c: Susan J. Berlin LlFI3: jms Enclosures I I 1993 138842/668928 1 LEXINGTON4 LOUISVILLE4 FRANKFORT4 HENDERSON COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY BEFQRE TI-IE PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION MAY 02 2011 PlJBLlC SERVICE IN THE MATTER OF: COMMISSION PETITION OF VIRGIN MOBILE USA, L.P. ) FOR LIMITED DESIGNATION AS AN ) Case No. 20 10-00524 ELIGIBLE TELECOMMUNICATIONS 1 CARRlER ) VIRGIN MOBILE USA, L,.P.'S RESPONSE TO COMMISSION STAFF'S FIRST DATA REQUESTS REQUEST 1. Kentucky currently requires that all Eligible Telecommunications Carriers ("ETCs") perform an audit of all customers receiving Lifeline benefits. Each customer must provide proof of eligibility. Does Virgin Mobile agree to audit all Lifeline customers each year rather than conduct a yearly audit of only a sample of customers? Responsible Party: Elaine Divelbliss RESPONSE: Virgin Mobile agrees to audit all Kentucky Lifeline customers each year, subject to any alternate processes implemented as a result of the FCC's pending Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on Lifeline and Link-'CTp Reform and Modernization (WC Docket No.
    [Show full text]
  • Nextel History Page 1 of 3
    Nextel History Page 1 of 3 ABOUT NEXTEL ........................................... NEXTEL HISTORY >Corporate Overview ........................................... > Executive Team Get the latest on our wireless innovation or take a .................................... look at past events. > History 2003 See what we've done in 2004: 2002 1999-2001 1987-1998 December 2004 ............................. Sprint and Nextel announce that their boards of directors have Corporate Governance ................................. unanimously approved a definitive agreement for a merger of equals. 5 Inclusion and Diversity ~ .................................... Nextel's youth iifesye brand, Boost Mobile. signs up its one-millionth I > Community Outreach customer. Nextel offers Direct Taikm, a unique service that provides a back-up off- network walkie-talkie service for use when customers are outside Nextel network coverage areas. Nextel is the first national carrier to offer this type of off-network Service integrated directly into a cellular handset. November 2004 Nextel achieves a perfed Swre on the Washington Posts annual cellular phone service test for the Second year in a row, surpassing all other wireless carriers. in its first year as the title sponsor of racing's premier series, the NASCAR NEXTEL Cup Series", Nextel is honored with the 2004 Horizon Award for Best Sports Business Integrated Marketing Pian. October 2004 Nextel and Trimblejoin forces to offer heonly outdoor recreation produd that uses mobile phones for navigation and trip planning. Nextel announces the availability of the Motorola i860. the first phone with a built-in camera to offer Nextel's premier walkie-talkie services. September 2004 Nextel. in partnership with NASCAR, unveils the first NASCAR NEXTEL Cup Trophy, which will be awarded to the 2004 NASCAR NEXTEL Cup Series" champion.
    [Show full text]
  • Considering All the Options for Replacing Nextel Push-To-Talk Communications Services
    WHITE PAPER: Considering All the Options for Replacing Nextel Push-to-Talk Communications Services Executive Summary Contents The long-awaited shutdown of the Nextel National Network is upon us, and a significant number of organizations across the nation are Executive Summary . 1 still considering exactly how they will replace their fleets of Nextel push-to-talk phones. What’s Happening and Why . 2 Push-to-talk capabilities have extensive applications in all manner of commercial environments, fostering both one-to-many and one-to- What Nextel Users Can Do . 3 one communication. But not all push-to-talk solutions are created equal, and organizations should not limit their considerations strictly Considering Options . 3 to phones. This white paper describes a range of options available to those who Sprint . 4 will be impacted by the Nextel network shutdown. These options extend beyond phones and beyond ownership of a phone fleet. Verizon Wireless . 4 AT&T. 5 Motorola Solutions . 5 The Rental Option . 6 Choosing a Dealer. 7 www.BearCom.com 1 WHITE paper: Considering All the Options for Replacing Nextel Push-to-Talk Communications Services What’s Happening and Why At businesses across the country, June 30, 2013, is circled on the calendar. That’s the day that the Nextel National Network is scheduled to go down. As it does, a generation of Nextel push-to-talk phones—once among the most versatile wireless communications options available—will cease to operate. Nextel Communications, builders of the Nextel network, began as FleetCall, and it specialized in wireless communications for fleet and dispatch customers.
    [Show full text]
  • SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 or TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 1-04721 SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) KANSAS 48 -0457967 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 6200 Sprint Parkway, Overland Park, Kansas 66251 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (800) 829-0965 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Series 1 common stock, $2.00 par value New York Stock Exchange Guarantees of Sprint Capital Corporation 6.875% Notes due 2028 New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 1-04721 SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) KANSAS 48 -0457967 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 2001 Edmund Halley Drive, Reston, Virginia 20191 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant ’s telephone number, including area code: (703) 433 -4000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock, Series 1, $2.00 par value, and Rights New York Stock Exchange Guarantees of Sprint Capital Corporation 6.875% Notes due 2028 New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 or TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission file number 1-04721 SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) KANSAS 48 -0457967 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 6200 Sprint Parkway, Overland Park, Kansas 66251 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (800) 829-0965 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Series 1 common stock, $2.00 par value New York Stock Exchange Guarantees of Sprint Capital Corporation 6.875% Notes due 2028 New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Attachment 1 to ITC Application for Transfer of Control of Sprintcom
    Attachment 1 to Application for Transfer of Control of SprintCom, Inc. from Sprint Nextel Corporation to Starburst II, Inc. Answer to Question 10: Please see attached Joint Application for Consent to Transfer International and Domestic Authority Pursuant to Section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended (“Joint Application”) at 3 for responses to paragraphs (c) and (d) of Section 63.18 with respect to the transferor and the transferee. Answer to Question 11: See Joint Application at 4-5 for the name, address, citizenship, and principal businesses of each person or entity that directly or indirectly owns at least ten (10) percent of the equity of the transferee, and the percentage of equity owned by each of those persons or entities. Answer to Question 12: The transferee has no interlocking directorates with a foreign carrier at this time, and has answered Question 12 “no.” Following consummation of the transaction, the transferee’s answer to this question may change to “yes”; see Joint Application at 5. Answer to Question 13: See Joint Application at Exhibit 2 for a narrative of the means by which the proposed assignment or transfer of control will take place. Answer to Question 14: See Joint Application at 6. Answer to Question 15: See Joint Application at 6. Answer to Question 16: See Joint Application at 6. Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Applications of Sprint Nextel Corporation, ) Transferor ) ) SOFTBANK CORP., and Starburst II, Inc., ) Transferees ) File No. _______________ ) Joint Application for Consent to Transfer ) International and Domestic Authority Pursuant to ) Section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, ) as amended ) JOINT APPLICATION FOR CONSENT TO TRANSFER INTERNATIONAL AND DOMESTIC AUTHORITY PURSUANT TO SECTION 214 OF THE COMMUNICATIONS ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED Pursuant to Section 214 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended (the “Communications Act”), 47 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Sprint Corporation Affiliate Index
    3/31/2015 SPRINT CORPORATION Incorporated October 5, 2012 in Delaware as Starburst II, Inc. Name changed to Sprint Corporation on July 10, 2013 (Direct Subsidiary) SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Incorporated November 15, 1938 in Kansas as United Utilities, Incorporated; Name changed to United Telecommunications, Inc. June 2, 1972 Name changed to Sprint Corporation February 26, 1992 Name changed to Sprint Nextel Corporation August 12, 2005 Certificate of Merger of Starburst III, Inc. into Sprint Nextel Corporation (survivor) and name changed to Sprint Communications, Inc. July 10, 2013 (Subsidiaries below) Ownership Interest Held Jurisdiction of By Its Incorporation Immediate Name or Organization Parent Alamosa Holdings, Inc. Delaware 100 Subsidiaries: AirGate PCS, Inc. Delaware 100 Subsidiaries: AGW Leasing Company, Inc. Delaware 100 AirGate Service Company, Inc. Delaware 100 SFE 7, LLC Delaware 100 Alamosa PCS Holdings, Inc. Delaware 100 Subsidiary: Alamosa (Delaware), Inc. Delaware 100 Subsidiaries: Alamosa Holdings, LLC Delaware 100 Subsidiary: Alamosa PCS, Inc. Delaware 100 Subsidiaries: Alamosa Wisconsin GP, LLC Wisconsin 100 Subsidiary: Alamosa Wisconsin Limited Partnership (see Wisconsin 1 Alamosa PCS, Inc.) Subsidiaries: Alamosa (Wisconsin) Properties, LLC Wisconsin 100 SFE 6, LLC (see Texas Telecommunications, Delaware 20.57 L.P.) Alamosa Limited, LLC Delaware 100 Subsidiary: Texas Telecommunications, LP Texas 99 Subsidiaries: Alamosa Properties, LP Texas 99 SFE 6, LLC (see Alamosa Wisconsin Limited Delaware 79.43 Partnership) Alamosa
    [Show full text]
  • I860 Boost Mobile Phone User's Guide
    i860 Boost MobileTM Phone User’s Guide Contents Boost Walkie-TalkieTM Calls® ........................21 Receiving Calls ..............................................22 Introduction................................................ 1 Choosing a Number to Call............................23 Welcome to Boost MobileTM — Wireless Missed Phone Calls .......................................25 for a New Generation....................................... 1 Using Speakerphone .....................................25 Using Mute.....................................................25 Getting Started........................................... 2 Making Emergency Phone Calls....................25 Battery ............................................................. 4 Activating Service ............................................ 9 Call Alerts ................................................ 27 Powering On and Off ....................................... 9 Sending Call Alerts ........................................27 Enabling Over-the-Air Security ...................... 10 Receiving Call Alerts......................................27 Finding Your Phone Number ......................... 11 Using the Call Alert Queue ............................27 Phone Basics................................................. 11 SIM Security .................................................. 15 Recent Calls............................................. 29 Calls and Call Alerts.......................................29 Locking the Keypad ....................................... 17
    [Show full text]
  • December 10, 2008 Ms. Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal
    December 10, 2008 Jenner & Block LLP Chicago 1099 New York Avenue, NW New York Suite 900 Washington, DC Washington, DC 20001 Tel 202-639-6000 www.jenner.com Ms. Marlene H. Dortch Mark D. Schneider Tel 202 639-6005 Secretary Fax 202 661-4945 Federal Communications Commission [email protected] 445 Twelfth Street, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 Re: Application to Transfer of Control of Domestic Authorizations Held by Embarq Corporation to CenturyTel, Inc. Under Section 214 of the Communications Act, WC Docket No. 08-238 Dear Ms. Dortch: In response to the Wireline Competition Bureau’s request, the attached exhibits list the providers that Embarq and CenturyTel have identified through several databases in the markets where they operate in adjacent exchanges. Because each company uses different sources to identify providers, we have separated the lists into two exhibits, one for Embarq and one for CenturyTel. Embarq’s provider list is compiled from five sources: (1) the MediaPrints database; (2) Ported Line Reports dating back to August 2006; (3) UNE LOOP & UNEP Reports; (4) internal wholesale reseller accounts; and (5) cell tower sites. CenturyTel’s provider list is compiled from four sources: (1) wholesale billing accounts; (2) internal marketing data; (3) Port Away reports dating back to December 2006; and (4) data from USAC. In addition, we have attached an exhibit containing maps of all adjacent exchanges. For your convenience, the two competitor list exhibits reference the map number where each adjacent exchange is located. Please let
    [Show full text]
  • (202) 514-2007 Tdd (202) 514-1888
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE AT WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 3, 2005 (202) 514-2007 WWW.USDOJ.GOV TDD (202) 514-1888 STATEMENT OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE ANTITRUST DIVISION ON THE CLOSING OF THE INVESTIGATION OF SPRINT CORPORATION’S ACQUISITION OF NEXTEL COMMUNICATIONS INC. Investigation Focused on Whether Merger of Two Mobile Wireless Carriers Would Lessen Competition WASHINGTON, D.C. – The Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division issued the following statement today after the Department announced the closing of its investigation into Sprint Corporation’s proposed acquisition of Nextel Communications Inc.: “The Division thoroughly investigated Sprint’s proposed acquisition of Nextel. Based on the facts, the Division found that the Sprint-Nextel merger would not give the companies market power in the areas in which they compete. Purchasers of mobile wireless services will continue to have a number of other carriers from which to choose after the merger. Although we did not find a need to challenge this merger to preserve competition, we did require divestitures in the recent ALLTEL-Western Wireless and Cingular Wireless-AT&T Wireless mergers, and we will continue to be vigilant in our enforcement of the antitrust laws with respect to any further proposed consolidation in this area. “The Division focused its investigation on mobile wireless telecommunications services that Sprint and Nextel currently offer, as well as on developing products such as advanced wireless broadband services where the companies are potential competitors. None of the theories of competitive harm that the Division considered were ultimately supported by the facts. The Division found no substantial proof that the merged company could unilaterally exercise market power postmerger or that there likely would be competitive harm from coordinated interaction among the merged company and other remaining providers.
    [Show full text]