DOCSLIB.ORG

Sprint Corporation Affiliate Index

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sprint Corporation Affiliate Index 3/31/2015 SPRINT CORPORATION Incorporated October 5, 2012 in Delaware as Starburst II, Inc. Name changed to Sprint Corporation on July 10, 2013 (Direct Subsidiary) SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. Incorporated November 15, 1938 in Kansas as United Utilities, Incorporated; Name changed to United Telecommunications, Inc. June 2, 1972 Name changed to Sprint Corporation February 26, 1992 Name changed to Sprint Nextel Corporation August 12, 2005 Certificate of Merger of Starburst III, Inc. into Sprint Nextel Corporation (survivor) and name changed to Sprint Communications, Inc. July 10, 2013 (Subsidiaries below) Ownership Interest Held Jurisdiction of By Its Incorporation Immediate Name or Organization Parent Alamosa Holdings, Inc. Delaware 100 Subsidiaries: AirGate PCS, Inc. Delaware 100 Subsidiaries: AGW Leasing Company, Inc. Delaware 100 AirGate Service Company, Inc. Delaware 100 SFE 7, LLC Delaware 100 Alamosa PCS Holdings, Inc. Delaware 100 Subsidiary: Alamosa (Delaware), Inc. Delaware 100 Subsidiaries: Alamosa Holdings, LLC Delaware 100 Subsidiary: Alamosa PCS, Inc. Delaware 100 Subsidiaries: Alamosa Wisconsin GP, LLC Wisconsin 100 Subsidiary: Alamosa Wisconsin Limited Partnership (see Wisconsin 1 Alamosa PCS, Inc.) Subsidiaries: Alamosa (Wisconsin) Properties, LLC Wisconsin 100 SFE 6, LLC (see Texas Telecommunications, Delaware 20.57 L.P.) Alamosa Limited, LLC Delaware 100 Subsidiary: Texas Telecommunications, LP Texas 99 Subsidiaries: Alamosa Properties, LP Texas 99 SFE 6, LLC (see Alamosa Wisconsin Limited Delaware 79.43 Partnership) Alamosa Delaware GP, LLC Delaware 100 Subsidiaries: Alamosa Properties, LP Texas 1 Texas Telecommunications, LP Texas 1 Alamosa Wisconsin Limited Partnership (see Alamosa Wisconsin 99 Wisconsin GP, LLC) 1---3/31/2015 Ownership Interest Held Jurisdiction of By Its Incorporation Immediate Name or Organization Parent (Alamosa Holdings, LLC subsidiaries continued) Alamosa Missouri, LLC Missouri 100 Subsidiaries: Alamosa Missouri Properties, LLC Missouri 100 SFE 11, LLC (see Southwest PCS, L.P.) Delaware 35.81 Washington Oregon Wireless, LLC Oregon 100 Subsidiaries: SFE 11, LLC (see Alamosa Missouri, LLC) Delaware 28.41 Washington Oregon Wireless Properties, LLC Delaware 100 SWLP, L.L.C. Oklahoma 100 Subsidiary: Southwest PCS, L.P. (see SWGP, L.L.C.) Oklahoma 99 SWGP, L.L.C. Oklahoma 100 Subsidiary: Southwest PCS, L.P. (see SWLP, L.L.C.) Oklahoma 1 Subsidiaries: SFE 11, LLC (see Washington Oregon Wireless, LLC) Delaware 35.78 Southwest PCS Properties, LLC Delaware 100 American Telecasting, Inc. Delaware 100 Subsidiary: (1) SN UHC 3, Inc. (see People’s Choice TV Corp. for SN UHC 3, Inc. subs; see endnote) Delaware 29.06 Atlanta MDS Co., Inc. Georgia 100 Subsidiary: (2) SN UHC 2, Inc. (see Sprint WBC of New York, Inc. for SN UHC 2, Inc. subs; see endnote) Delaware 4.42 Caroline Ventures, Inc. Delaware 100 C FON Corporation Delaware 100 (3)(4a) Clearwire Corporation (see SN UHC 1, Inc.) Delaware 89.26 Subsidiary: (3)(4b) Clearwire Communications LLC (see SN UHC 1, Inc.) Delaware 36.06 Subsidiaries: Clearwire Finance, Inc. Delaware 100 Clearwire IP Holdings LLC New York 100 Clearwire Hawaii Partners Spectrum, LLC Nevada 100 Clearwire Legacy LLC Delaware 100 Subsidiaries: Clearwire International, LLC Washington 100 Subsidiaries: Clearwire Europe B.V. Netherlands 100 Subsidiary: Clearwire Europe S.a.r.l. (see Clearwire International, LLC) Luxembourg 92.78 Clearwire Europe S.a.r.l. (see Clear Share I, LLC) Luxembourg 4.93 Subsidiary: Imagine Communications Group Limited Ireland 0.44 2—3/31/2015 Ownership Interest Held Jurisdiction of By Its Incorporation Immediate Name or Organization Parent (Clearwire International, LLC subsidiaries continued) Clear Share I, LLC Delaware 100 Subsidiary: Clearwire Europe S.a.r.l. (see Clear Share II, LLC) Luxembourg 0.002 Clear Share II, LLC Delaware 100 Subsidiary: Clearwire Europe S.a.r.l. (see Clear Share III, LLC) Luxembourg 0.002 Clear Share III, LLC Delaware 100 Subsidiary: Clearwire Europe S.a.r.l. (see Clearwire Europe B.V.) Luxembourg 0.002 MVS Net, S.A. de C.V. Mexico 26.27 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings LLC Nevada 100 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II LLC Nevada 100 Clearwire Telecommunications Services, LLC Nevada 100 Fixed Wireless Holdings, LLC Delaware 100 Clear Management Services LLC Nevada 100 Clearwire Spectrum Holdings III LLC Nevada 100 Clear Wireless LLC Nevada 100 Subsidiaries: Clear Global Services LLC Nevada 100 Clear Partner Holdings LLC Nevada 100 Subsidiary: Xanadoo Broadband LLC (Inactive) Delaware 20 Clearwire XOHM LLC Delaware 100 Subsidiaries: Alda Wireless Holdings, LLC Delaware 100 American Telecasting Development, LLC Delaware 100 American Telecasting of Anchorage, LLC Delaware 100 American Telecasting of Bend, LLC Delaware 100 American Telecasting of Columbus, LLC Delaware 100 American Telecasting of Denver, LLC Delaware 100 American Telecasting of Fort Myers, LLC Delaware 100 American Telecasting of Ft. Collins, LLC Delaware 100 American Telecasting of Green Bay, LLC Delaware 100 American Telecasting of Lansing, LLC Delaware 100 American Telecasting of Lincoln, LLC Delaware 100 American Telecasting of Little Rock, LLC Delaware 100 American Telecasting of Louisville, LLC Delaware 100 American Telecasting of Medford, LLC Delaware 100 American Telecasting of Michiana, LLC Delaware 100 American Telecasting of Monterey, LLC Delaware 100 American Telecasting of Redding, LLC Delaware 100 American Telecasting of Santa Barbara, LLC Delaware 100 American Telecasting of Seattle, LLC Delaware 100 American Telecasting of Sheridan, LLC Delaware 100 American Telecasting of Yuba City, LLC Delaware 100 3—3/31/2015 Ownership Interest Held Jurisdiction of By Its Incorporation Immediate Name or Organization Parent (Clearwire XOHM LLC subsidiaries continued) ATI of Santa Rosa, LLC Delaware 100 ATI Sub, LLC Delaware 100 ATL MDS, LLC Delaware 100 Bay Area Cablevision, LLC Delaware 100 Fresno MMDS Associates, LLC Delaware 100 NSAC, LLC Delaware 100 Subsidiaries: Broadcast Cable, LLC Delaware 100 Kennewick Licensing, LLC Delaware 100 WBSY Licensing, LLC Delaware 100 PCTV Gold II, LLC Delaware 100 PCTV of Salt Lake City, LLC Delaware 100 PCTV Sub, LLC Delaware 100 People’s Choice TV of Albuquerque, LLC Delaware 100 People’s Choice TV of Houston, LLC Delaware 100 People’s Choice TV of St. Louis, LLC Delaware 100 SCC X, LLC Delaware 100 Speedchoice of Detroit, LLC Delaware 100 Speedchoice of Phoenix, LLC Delaware 100 Sprint (Bay Area), LLC Delaware 100 TDI Acquisition Sub, LLC Delaware 100 Transworld Telecom II, LLC Delaware 100 Wavepath Sub, LLC Delaware 100 WBS of America, LLC Delaware 100 WBS of Sacramento, LLC Delaware 100 WBSFP Licensing, LLC Delaware 100 WCOF, LLC Delaware 100 Wireless Broadband Services of America, LLC Delaware 100 (REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT BLANK) 4—3/31/2015 Ownership Interest Held Jurisdiction of By Its Incorporation Immediate Name or Organization Parent (Sprint Communications, Inc. subsidiaries continued) iPCS, Inc. Delaware 100 Subsidiaries: Bright PCS Holdings, Inc. Delaware 100 Subsidiary: Bright Personal Communications Services, LLC Ohio 100 Subsidiary: SFE 15, LLC iPCS Wireless, Inc. Delaware 100 Subsidiaries: iPCS Equipment, Inc. Delaware 100 SFE 12, LLC Delaware 100 Horizon Personal Communications, Inc. Ohio 100 Subsidiary: SFE 14, LLC Delaware 100 IWO Holdings, Inc. Delaware 100 Subsidiary: Independent Wireless One Corporation Delaware 100 Subsidiary: Independent Wireless One Leased Realty Corporation Delaware 100 SFE 10, LLC Delaware 100 Los Angeles MDS Company, Inc. California 100 Subsidiary: (2) SN UHC 2, Inc. (see Sprint WBC of New York, Inc. for SN UHC 2, Inc. subs; see endnote) Delaware 8.59 New York MDS, Inc. Delaware 100 Subsidiary: (2) SN UHC 2, Inc. (see Sprint WBC of New York, Inc. for SN UHC 2, Inc. subs; see endnote) Delaware 21.58 Nextel Communications, Inc. Delaware 100 Subsidiaries: Dial Call Midwest, Inc. Delaware 100 NCI 900 Spectrum Holdings, Inc. Delaware 100 Subsidiaries: ACI 900, Inc. Delaware 100 Velocita Wireless Holding Corp. Delaware 100 Subsidiaries: Machine License Holding, LLC (see Velocita Wireless Holding, LLC) Delaware 96.17 Velocita Wireless Holding, LLC Delaware 100 Subsidiary: Machine License Holding, LLC (see Velocita Wireless Holding Corp.) Delaware 3.83 5—3/31/2015 Ownership Interest Held Jurisdiction of By Its Incorporation Immediate Name or Organization Parent (Nextel Communications, Inc. subsidiaries continued) Nextel Finance Company Delaware 100 Subsidiaries: FCI 900, Inc. Delaware 100 Nextel of California, Inc. Delaware 100 Subsidiaries: Boost Mobile, LLC Delaware 100 Nextel Boost of California, LLC Delaware 100 Nextel Communications of the Mid-Atlantic, Inc. Delaware 100 Subsidiary: Nextel Boost of the Mid-Atlantic, LLC Delaware 100 Nextel License Acquisition Corp. Delaware 100 Nextel of New York, Inc. Delaware 100 Subsidiary: Nextel Boost of New York, LLC Delaware 100 Nextel Operations, Inc. Delaware 100 Subsidiary: Nextel Retail Stores, LLC Delaware 100 Nextel South Corp. Georgia 100 Subsidiaries: Nextel Boost South, LLC Delaware 100 Nextel Systems Corp. Delaware 100 Nextel of Texas, Inc. Texas 100 Subsidiary: Nextel Boost of Texas, LLC Delaware 100 Nextel West Corp. Delaware 100 Subsidiaries: Nextel Boost West, LLC Delaware 100 Nextel West Services, LLC Delaware 100 Nextel of Puerto Rico, Inc. Puerto Rico 100 Sprint Nextel Holdings (ME) Corp. Delaware 100 Tower Parent Corp. Delaware 100 Unrestricted Subsidiary Funding Company Delaware 100 Subsidiaries: Nextel 220 License Acquisition Corp.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ITIF Files Comments Supporting T-Mobile-Sprint Merger
    Before the FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Washington, DC 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Applications of T-Mobile US, Inc. and Sprint ) WT Docket No. 18-197 Corporation for Consent to Transfer Control of ) Licenses and Authorizations ) OPPOSITION TO PETITIONS TO DENY OF ITIF The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (“ITIF”)1 appreciates this opportunity to comment in support of the pending merger of T-Mobile US, Inc. (“T-Mobile”) and Sprint Corporation (“Sprint”).2 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY ITIF supports this transaction with the belief that the merger advances innovative wireless broadband services, offers significant benefits that will ultimately flow to consumers, and presents few concerns in terms of competition. The merger offers significant scale and operational efficiencies that will help accelerate the transition to next generation, 5G networks, intensifying competition, and bringing numerous benefits that flow throughout the economy. An honest examination of the facts should find this merger in the public interest under sections 214(a) and 310(d) of the Communications Act.3 Petitions to deny the merger do not fully appreciate the synergies of the transaction and take too myopic a view of how competition functions in today’s media and telecommunications landscape. Some critics of the merger focus narrowly on the number of competitors, decrying this merger as a 4 to 3 reduction. This view does not appreciate companies on the cusp of wireless entry, such as cable firms, or, more importantly, the 1 The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) is a non-partisan research and educational institute – a think tank – whose mission is to formulate and promote public policies to advance technological innovation and productivity internationally, in Washington, and in the states.
    [Show full text]
  • The Konkurrenz Group Washington, Dc
    THE KONKURRENZ GROUP WASHINGTON, DC Allen P. Grunes 202-644-9760 | [email protected] REDACTED—FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION May 31, 2019 Marlene H. Dortch Federal Communications Commission 445 Twelfth Street S.W. Washington, D.C. 20554 RE: Ex Parte Notice. Applications of T-Mobile, US, Inc. and Sprint Corporation for Consent to Transfer Control of Licenses and Authorizations. WT Docket No. 18-197. Dear Ms. Dortch: The Communications Workers of America (“CWA”) submits this written ex parte letter in response to the May 20, 2019 letter from T-Mobile and Sprint (“Applicants”) that describes the Applicants’ proposed commitments related to their proposed merger (“Commitment Letter”).1 The Commitment Letter fails to address the significant competitive harm, spectrum consolidation, and loss of 30,000 jobs that would result from the transaction. Further, the Applicants’ unverifiable rural deployment commitments would leave as many as 39.2 million rural households without access to the “New T-Mobile’s” high-speed 5G network. Moreover, the so-called “voluntary contributions” the Applicants proffer for failure to meet deployment commitments are toothless; not only are they tax-deductible as “voluntary contributions” to the U.S. Treasury, they represent an infinitesimal portion of the $74 billion 2018 pro forma revenue of the combined T-Mobile/Sprint. 1 Letter from Regina M. Keeney and Richard Metzger, Counsel to Sprint Corporation, and Nancy J. Victory and Michael Senkowski, Counsel to T-Mobile US Inc. to Ms. Marlene H. Dortch, Secretary, WT Docket No. 18-197 (May 20, 2019) (“Commitment Letter”). 5335 Wisconsin Ave., N.W. | Suite 440 | Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2016
    SoftBank Group Corp. ANNUAL REPORT 2016 Corporate Philosophy Information Revolution – Happiness for everyone Vision The corporate group needed most by people around the world SoftBank Group Corp. ANNUAL REPORT 2016 001 A History of Challenges A History of Challenges The view is different when you challenge yourself Continuing to take on new challenges and embrace change without fear. Driving business forward through exhaustive debate. This is the SoftBank Group’s DNA. SoftBank Group Corp. ANNUAL REPORT 2016 002 A History of Challenges Established SoftBank Japan. 1981 Commenced operations as a distributor of packaged software. 1982 Entered the publishing business. Launched Oh! PC and Oh! MZ, monthly magazines introducing PCs and software by manufacturer. 1994 Acquired events division from Ziff Communications Company of the U.S. through SoftBank Holdings Inc. 1996 Acquired Ziff-Davis Publishing Company, U.S. publisher of PC WEEK magazine and provider of leading-edge information on the PC industry. SoftBank Group Corp. ANNUAL REPORT 2016 003 A History of Challenges Established Yahoo Japan through joint investment with Yahoo! Inc. in the U.S. 1996 Began to develop into an Internet company at full scale. Yahoo Japan Net income* 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 FY (Note) Accounting standard: JGAAP up to fiscal 2012; IFRSs from fiscal 2013 onward. * Net income attributable to owners of the parent. SoftBank Group Corp. ANNUAL REPORT 2016 004 A History of Challenges Made full-scale entry into the telecommunications business. 2000s Contributed to faster, more affordable telecommunications services in Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • T-Mobile Complaint
    Case 1:20-cv-10998 Document 1 Filed 05/22/20 Page 1 of 37 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS CHICAGO INSTRUCTIONAL TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC., DENVER AREA EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS CONSORTIUM, INC., INSTRUCTIONAL Case No. __________________ TELECOMMUNICATIONS FOUNDATION, INC., NORTH AMERICAN CATHOLIC EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMMING JURY TRIAL REQUESTED FOUNDATION, INC., PORTLAND REGIONAL EDUCATIONAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION, TWIN CITIES SCHOOLS’ TELECOMMUNICATIONS GROUP, INC., Plaintiffs, v. CLEARWIRE SPECTRUM HOLDINGS II LLC, CLEARWIRE LEGACY LLC f/k/a CLEARWIRE CORPORATION, T-MOBILE US, INC., Defendants. COMPLAINT Plaintiffs Chicago Instructional Technology Foundation, Inc., Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium, Inc., Instructional Telecommunications Foundation, Inc., North American Catholic Educational Programming Foundation, Inc., Portland Regional Educational Telecommunications Corporation, and Twin Cities Schools’ Telecommunications Group, Ind. by and through their undersigned attorneys, allege upon personal knowledge and belief as follows: NATURE OF THE ACTION 1. Plaintiffs seek injunctive relief to stop Defendants from unlawfully pirating their spectrum and damages from Defendant T-Mobile US, Inc. (“T-Mobile”) for its wrongful taking of Case 1:20-cv-10998 Document 1 Filed 05/22/20 Page 2 of 37 that spectrum. Plaintiffs are six nonprofit organizations that have been granted more than 60 licenses by the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) to operate Educational Broadband Service (“EBS”) channels in the 2.5 GHz spectrum band for educational purposes in markets across the country. In furtherance of their educational purposes, Plaintiffs agreed in July 2006 to lease their excess EBS spectrum capacity (“Spectrum”) to Defendants Clearwire Spectrum Holdings II LLC and Clearwire Legacy LLC (together, “Clearwire”) for commercial use over a thirty-year term.
    [Show full text]
  • Virgin Mobile USA to Acquire Helio for Approximately $39 Million in Equity
    Virgin Mobile USA to Acquire Helio for Approximately $39 Million in Equity - Additional strategic investment totaling $50 million made by Virgin Group and SK Telecom at $8.50 per share - Improved capital structure through increased liquidity and $50 million paydown of senior secured credit facility - Incremental $60 million added to revolving credit facility - Maximum assumption of $10 million debt and $15 million net working capital liabilities - Net debt reduction of approximately $35 million upon closing - Approximately 170,000 Helio customers with approximately $80 ARPU - Entry into postpaid segment through acquisition of highly sophisticated customer platform supporting unique user applications - Improved network rates and ability to realize significant operational synergies - Adjusted EBITDA accretive in 2008, excluding non-recurring transition costs Note: Virgin Mobile USA will host a conference call today for investors and analysts to discuss the details of the transaction and its ongoing growth strategy. The call will be broadcast live on the Internet at 11:00 A.M. EDT on Friday, June 27, 2008. Det WARREN, N.J., June 27 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Virgin Mobile USA, Inc. (NYSE: VM), a leading national provider of wireless communications services, today announced that it has entered into an agreement to acquire Helio, a joint venture between SK Telecom and EarthLink, Inc. (NASDAQ: ELNK) providing highly advanced postpaid products and services with unique user applications. Under the terms of the agreement, Virgin Mobile USA will acquire Helio from SK Telecom and EarthLink for limited partnership units equivalent to 13 million shares of Virgin Mobile USA class A common stock, with a value of $39 million based on the closing price of Virgin Mobile USA's class A shares on June 26, 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, D
    “We recognized that a shift was occuring in consumer mindset from some of the extravagances of the previous few years to a focus on value.” 1 Virgin Mobile USA 2008 Annual Report 2008 WAS A TRANSFORMATIONAL YEAR AT VIRGIN MOBILE USA. In late 2007 we began to see early signs of the global recession in our customer base. As gas prices began to rise and budgets tightened, our customers cut back on their mobile usage in order to optimize spending. We recognized that a shift was occuring in consumer mindset from some of the extravagances of the previous few years to a focus on value. At Virgin Mobile USA, we have always focused on providing value and fl exibility to our customers, allowing them to change plans according to their budgetary needs so they can get the most from their wireless service. We realized that now more than ever, we needed to emphasize our value proposition and focus our message on the value we off er to consumers. And so we began to implement a number of strategic and operational initiatives in 2008 that focused on value – on the value we bring to consumers, as well as putting the right operational initiatives in place to build shareholder value. Virgin Mobile USA 2008 Annual Report 2 1. CHANGE THE DIRECTION OF OUR HEADLINE NUMBERS 2. DRAMATICALLY IMPROVE OUR COST STRUCTURE 3. OFFER OUR CUSTOMERS A FULL SUITE OF SERVICES, INCLUDING A POSTPAID PRODUCT 4. IMPROVE OUR BALANCE SHEET AND LIQUIDITY As many of our customers had reduced their usage 2008. These initiatives showed an immediate impact due to the emerging economic challenges, we began in the third quarter, helping to improve our gross add 2008 with negative trend lines in many metrics, trend lines from a decline of 10% year over year in including revenues, customer acquisition and Adjusted Q1, to positive 8% growth in Q3 and fl at gross adds in Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Q4 within a diffi cult retail environment.
    [Show full text]
  • 2008 International Telecommunications Data (Filed As of October 31, 2009)
    2008 International Telecommunications Data (Filed as of October 31, 2009) March 2010 Strategic Analysis and Negotiations Division Multilateral Negotiations and Industry Analysis Branch International Bureau This report is available for reference in the FCC’s Reference Information Center at 445 12th Street, S.W., Courtyard Level. Copies may be purchased by calling the FCC’s duplicating contractor, Best Copy and Printing, Inc., 445 12th Street, S.W., Room CY-B402, Washington, DC 20554, telephone 1-800-378-3160, facsimile 202-488-5563, or via e-mail www.bcpiweb.com. The report can also be downloaded [file name: CREPOR08.ZIP or CREPOR08.PDF] from www.fcc.gov/ib. 2008 International Telecommunications Data March 2010 Introduction This is the Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC’s) annual report compiling data on telecommunications service between the United States and international points. The data compiled in this report are for the year 2008. The data are compiled from reports submitted to the FCC by U.S. carriers pursuant to Section 43.61 of the Commission's rules.1 Section 43.61(a) directs carriers to file reports by July 31 which summarize international telecommunications service provided during the preceding calendar year. Carriers submit corrections of the data by October 31. The specific filing requirements are set forth in the Manual for Filing Section 43.61 Data (June 1995). Statistical Findings • U.S.-billed minutes increased 7.0% from 70.0 billion in 2007 to 74.9 billion in 2008. • In 2008, 77 U.S. facilities-based and facilities-resale carriers (see definitions on page 3) together reported that they billed $6.5 billion for international telephone service, and $816 million for international private line and other miscellaneous services, compared to $6.5 billion and $717 million, respectively, in 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Wireless Emergency Alerts Mobile Penetration Strategy
    WIRELESS EMERGENCY ALERTS MOBILE PENETRATION STRATEGY August 2013 Task Lead Daniel Gonzales Task Staff Edward Balkovich Brian Jackson Jan Osburg Andrew Parker Evan Saltzman Ricardo Sanchez Shoshana Shelton Chuck Stelzner Dulani Woods Henry H. Willis Director, Homeland Security and Defense Center National Defense Research Institute Jack Riley Vice President and Director, National Security Research Division Director, National Defense Research Institute Acknowledgments The National Defense Research Institute, a division of the RAND Corporation, performed this analysis for the Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate. The NDRI team extends its deep appreciation to members of the emergency response and wireless communications communities for their cooperation, information, and feedback; their contributions are the foundation of this report. Further, the NDRI team offers its gratitude to the emergency responders whose dedication and commitment ensure the safety of our families, our communities, and our nation. This report is a tribute to their service. In addition, we would like to extend our appreciation for constructive peer reviews provided by Marvin Sirbu of Carnegie Mellon University and by David Senty. NDRI Publication Number: PR-594-OSD iii Preface The objective of this analysis, performed for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Science and Technology Directorate, was to independently assess the coverage and penetration of the Wireless Emergency Alert (WEA) system, and to offer recommendations to improve the availability, coverage, and penetration of WEA to the U.S. public. The intended audience of this report is U.S. government decision makers; commercial mobile service providers; mobile wireless device manufacturers; and federal, state, local, and tribal alert originators.
    [Show full text]
  • HNI Entity 310-010 Verizon Wireless 310-012 Verizon
    HNI Entity 310-010 Verizon Wireless 310-012 Verizon Wireless 310-013 Verizon Wireless 310-014 TEST IMSI HNI 310-016 Cricket Communications 310-020 Union Telephone Company 310-030 AT&T Mobility 310-035 ETEX Communications, LP (d/b/a) ETEX Wireless 310-050 Alaska Communications 310-060 Consolidated Telcom 310-070 AT&T Mobility 310-080 AT&T Mobility 310-090 Cricket Communications, LLC 310-100 New Mexico RSA 4 East Limited Partnership 310-110 Pacific Telecom Inc. 310-120 SPRINTCOM, INC. 310-130 Carolina West Wireless 310-140 GTA Wireless LLC 310-150 AT&T Mobility 310-160 T-Mobile USA 310-170 AT&T Mobility 310-180 West Central Wireless 310-190 Alaska Wireless Communications, LLC 310-200 T-Mobile USA 310-210 T-Mobile USA 310-220 T-Mobile USA 310-230 T-Mobile USA 310-240 T-Mobile USA 310-250 T-Mobile USA 310-260 T-Mobile USA 310-270 T-Mobile USA 310-280 AT&T Mobility 310-290 NEP Cellcorp, Inc. 310-300 Blanca Telephone Company 310-310 T-Mobile USA 310-320 Smith Bagley, Inc. dba CellularOne 310-330 Wireless Partners LLC 310-340 Limitless Mobile, LLC 310-350 Verizon Wireless 310-360 Cellular Network Partnership dba Pioneer Cellular 310-370 Docomo Pacific, Inc. 310-380 AT&T Mobility 310-390 TX-11 Acquisition, LLC 310-400 Wave Runner LLC 310-410 AT&T Mobility 310-420 Cincinnati Bell Wireless, LLC 310-430 GCI Communications Corp 310-440 Numerex Corp 310-450 North East Cellular Inc. 310-460 Newcore Wireless 310-470 Sprint 310-480 Wave Runner LLC 310-490 T-Mobile USA 310-500 Public Service Cellular, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Public Safety Communications in the 800 Mhz Band; Consolidating the 900 Mhz Industrial/Land Transportation and Business Pool Channels, WT Docket No
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 04-168 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Improving Public Safety Communications in the ) 800 MHz Band ) WT Docket 02-55 ) Consolidating the 800 and 900 MHz ) Industrial/Land Transportation and Business Pool ) Channels ) ) ET Docket No. 00-258 Amendment of Part 2 of the Commission’s Rules ) to Allocate Spectrum Below 3 GHz for Mobile ) and Fixed Services to Support the Introduction of ) New Advanced Wireless Services, including Third ) RM-9498 Generation Wireless Systems ) ) Petition for Rule Making of the Wireless ) Information Networks Forum Concerning the ) RM-10024 Unlicensed Personal Communications Service ) ) Petition for Rule Making of UT Starcom, Inc., ) Concerning the Unlicensed Personal ) ET Docket No. 95-18 Communications Service ) ) Amendment of Section 2.106 of the Commission’s ) Rules to Allocate Spectrum at 2 GHz for use by ) the Mobile Satellite Service REPORT AND ORDER, FIFTH REPORT AND ORDER, FOURTH MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, AND ORDER Adopted: July 8, 2004 Released: August 6, 2004 By the Commission: Chairman Powell, Commissioners Abernathy, Copps, and Adelstein issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................. 1 II. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................... 8 III. MAJOR FINDINGS
    [Show full text]
  • The Town of Willington's Permitting System Requires Applicants to Have
    Town of Willington Land Use and Building Department Willington Town Office Building 40 Old Farms Road Willington, CT 06279 The Town of Willington’s permitting system requires applicants to have a valid email address to apply for permits, receive approvals and other permit documents. This is also the primary contact point for communicating to an applicant regarding building inspections or additional information needed during the permit review process. This email address not only allows the applicant to communicate directly with department staff, but it also allows Town staff to transmit permit documents, approvals and certificates directly to the applicant. The Town of Willington does not mail paper copies of permit approvals and/or certificates. If you do not have an email address, but do have a mobile phone that is capable of receiving text messages, that can be used in lieu of a traditional email address.. Every wireless carrier in America allows emails to be sent as text messages to a mobile phone (standard text messaging rates will apply). The only information you need is the phone number and the wireless carrier. The mobile email address for each carrier is listed below: T-Mobile [10-digit phone number]@tmomail.net Example: [email protected] AT&T Wireless (formerly Cingular) [10-digit phone number]@txt.att.net Example: [email protected] Verizon [10-digit-number]@vtext.com Example: [email protected] Boost Mobile [10-digit phone number] @sms.myboostmobile.com Example: [email protected] Cricket Wireless [10-digit phone number]@sms.mycricket.com Example: [email protected] Town of Willington Land Use and Building Department Willington Town Office Building 40 Old Farms Road Willington, CT 06279 Sprint [10-digit phone number]@messaging.sprintpcs.com Example: [email protected] Tracfone or Straight Talk The address varies.
    [Show full text]
  • Sprint Nextel Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2010 Results
    Sprint Nextel Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2010 Results Company Release - 02/10/2011 07:00 Added nearly 1.1 million total wireless subscribers including net postpaid subscriber additions – both bests in nearly five years – and highest ever fourth quarter prepaid net subscriber additions ● Best ever fourth quarter and annual postpaid churn results ● Twelfth consecutive quarter of improvement in Customer Care Satisfaction and First Call Resolution ● Sequential and year-over-year total quarterly net operating revenue growth ● Free Cash Flow* of $913 million in the fourth quarter and $2.5 billion for 2010 The company’s fourth quarter and full year 2010 earnings conference call will be held at 8 a.m. EST today. Participants may dial 800-938-1120 in the U.S. or Canada (706-634-7849 internationally) and provide the following ID: 38599868, or may listen via the Internet at www.sprint.com/investor. OVERLAND PARK, Kan.--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- Sprint Nextel Corp. (NYSE: S) today reported that during the fourth quarter of 2010, the company achieved its best total company wireless subscriber additions and net postpaid additions since the first and second quarters of 2006, respectively. The company added nearly 1.1 million total wireless subscribers driven by net postpaid subscriber additions of 58,000, which include net subscriber additions of 519,000 for the Sprint brand - and the company’s best ever fourth quarter prepaid net subscriber additions of 646,000. The company delivered postpaid churn of 1.86 percent - the best postpaid churn result Sprint has reported in the fourth quarter of any year.
    [Show full text]