DOCSLIB.ORG

Acadia National Park Revegetation Program 2000

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Acadia National Park Revegetation Program 2000 ACADIA NATIONAL PARK REVEGETATION PROGRAM 2000 ANNUAL REPORT ANPNATURALRESOURCEREPORT GENEVA E. CHASE LINDA L. GREGORY ACADIA NATIONAL PARK PO BOX 177 BAR HARBOR, ME 04609 Acadia National Park Natural Resources Report 2001-07 TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents / ii Executive Summary / iii Introduction / 1 2000 Program Goals and Accomplishments / 1 Revegetation Program Staff / 2 NRCS Activities / 2 V olunteer Groups / 3 Junior Ranger Days / 3 Native Plant Nursery / 3 Sites Receiving Additional Plantings /5 2000 Revegetation Projects / 11 Tables Table 1. Volunteer Group Hours / 3 Table 2. Previously Revegetated Sites receiving Additional Plantings / 5 Table 3.2000 Revegetation Projects / 11 . Appendices Appendix A. List of Revegetation Projects / 26 Appendix B. Quantitative Monitoring Form / 27-28 Appendix C. NRCS Distribution and Delivery Records / 29 Appendix D. NRCS 2000 Annual Report / 30 Appendix E. Native Plants Journal Articles / 31 Appendix F. Nursery Inventory / 32 11 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY During 2000, the Acadia National Park Revegetation Program staff worked on 43 park sites, totaling an area of just over two acres. This included sixteen new sites that were revegetated with genetically native plants and seed, and additional plantings made at nine sites where revegetation projects were undertaken in previous years. Maintenance work such as weeding, pruning and erecting barriers was conducted at 18 sites that were revegetated in previous years. Revegetation Program goals included restoring native vegetation following construction and trail maintenance, mitigating safety concerns and visitor use degradation, and establishing screening. A total of 157 trees, 255 woody shrubs, 1310 herbaceous plants, 177 pounds of grass seed, and 1.6 pounds of wildflower seed were planted. Plant materials were obtained via two cooperative agreements with the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). The park received 79.5 pounds of grass and wildflower seed, 982 container plants, and 3060 plugs, all propagated from seed or cuttings from park lands. Plant materials were stored at the park's native plant nursery, which was actively maintained between May and October. Plants received and not used were over-wintered at the nursery. Volunteer groups, the Acadia Youth Conservation Corps, Acadia Resource Management staff, and a Student Conservation Association volunteer (SCA) assisted with revegetation projects. All sites were watered and cared for throughout the summer. Digital photos were taken to document the current conditions of each site. A pilot quantitative monitoring program to assess revegetation success was initiated. To date, a total of 84 sites have been revegetated in Acadia since the inception of the revegetation program in 1994. 111 INTRODUCTION This report documents the work accomplished during the 2000 season at each project site. It lists each site by name and number, and includes a summary of any previous work performed at the site, a list of vegetation planted, revegetation methods, and notes on any remaining work to be completed. 2000 PROGRAM GOALS & ACCOMPLISHMENTS Sixteen new sites, numbered 69 through 84, were revegetated using genetically native plants and seed. Additional plant material was added to nine previously revegetated sites, and maintenance work continued at 18 previously revegetated sites. Revegetation was conducted in an area of just over 2 acres (this area does not include the 18 maintained sites where no additional plantings were made). Revegetation program goals for 2000 focused on using native plant materials to revegetate high priority projects. Natural Resources staff developed a list of possible revegetation projects with input from other divisions (see Appendix A). Several projects related to new construction including trailhead restrooms and sewer line replacements. Projects not completed this year will be considered for 2001. We experimented with jute erosion mat at two sites, one at the Sand Beach Erosion Area (Site 70) and another at the Otter Point Overlook (Site 78). At both sites, native Red Fescue seed was hand spread directly on the ground, then raked into the soil and watered. At the Sand Beach Erosion Area, a Goldenrod and Annual Rye seed mixture was spread. The jute mats were spread over the seeded areas and held down with metal staples and rocks. Revegetation success was monitored at all sites completed between 1994 and 1999 (numbered 1 through 68). Visual observations were made to determine overall revegetation success. Quantitative notes concerning the overall success of each site are recorded on a Revegetation Monitoring Form (Appendix B). Resource Management staff continues to work on revising the monitoring forms which were used for the first time during the 2000 season. Due to time constraints, global positioning system (GPS) points for 2000 revegetation sites were not made. This data will be collected in 2001 and added to the existing revegetation data layer. 1 REVEGETATION PROGRAM STAFF The 2000 Revegetation Program staff consisted of Park Botanist, Linda Gregory, who oversaw the program and two Biological Technicians, Geneva Chase and Jesse Wheeler, who conducted all revegetation projects and associated activities. The Maintenance division and trail crew assisted with revegetation projects when needed. In July, trail crew provided revegetation staff with a second water barrel for the revegetation truck, raising the water carrying capacity to 100 gallons. Prior to the start of Acadia Youth Conservation Corps (A YCC) summer season, Resource Management staff met with Trails Foreman, Gary Stellpflug, and Chief of Maintenance, Jim Vekasi, to discuss which revegetation projects would require AYCC assistance. Four members of the AYCC and their crew leaders assisted with various revegetation projects throughout the summer. In addition, Justin Baker, a Student Conservation Association (SCA) intern from Minuteman National Monument, and Lynne Stephenson, a former A YCC member, volunteered a week each to assist with revegetation and other projects. Acadia National Park employees Brady Dixon, from the Entrance Station, and lifeguards Chris James and John McElrath, volunteered a few hours to assist with projects, as well. NRCS ACTIVITIES In May park staff met with Natural Resources Conservation Service (NCRS) staff from Big Flats Plant Materials Center and NRCS Coordinators for the NPS from the Denver Service Center. The goals for the meeting were to review existing inter-agency cooperative agreements; review upcoming projects within the next 3-5 years that will require a revegetation component; discuss ways to meet those revegetation needs, especially for the large campground rehabilitation projects; and plan for new cooperative agreements. The NRCS provided the park with native "plugs" and container plants propagated from seed or cuttings collected in the park. The NRCS propagation program is funded via two existing cooperative agreements between the NPS and NRCS. A total of3060 plugs, 982 container plants, and 79.5 lbs. of red fescue seed were received for revegetation projects. A complete list of amounts of plant and seed species received is found in NRCS Distribution and Delivery Records (Appendix C). A copy of the NRCS annual report can be found in Appendix D. Lastly, two articles highlighting NRCS work in Acadia appeared in the newly published Native Plants Journal: "Vegetated Erosion Control Mats for Site Stabilization" (van der Grinten and Gregory 2000) and "Harvesting Native Seeds with a Gas Hedge Trimmer" (van der Grinten 2000) (See Appendix E). 2 VOLUNTEER GROUPS Volunteer groups worked 216 hours assisting with revegetation projects. Each group was provided instruction on revegetation methods and techniques and the importance of using native plant materials. The project goals were explained. The names of each group, the number of participants, hours worked and location of project sites are listed in Table 1. Table 1. Volunteer Group Hours Volunteer Group Hours & Participants Location St. Louis Priory School 12 people/3 hours=36hrs Otter Point (Site 56) Trailmark 13 people/3 hours=39hrs South Bubble Summit (Site 75) Landmark 14 people/6 hours=84hrs Native Plant Nursery and Schooner Head Overlook (Site 5A) Becket Chimney Comers 15 people/3 hours=45 hrs Pullout by One Way (Site 76) Greenbrier Outdoor 6 people/2 hours = 12hrs Seawall Housing Unit (Site 32) Adventures Total Hours & 60 people for 216 hrs. Participants: JUNIOR RANGER DAYS Junior Ranger Days are coordinated by the Interpretation Division and consist of a day of activities for elementary school children from the local communities held at either Seawall or Thompson Island Picnic Areas. Children clean beaches, plant trees, and learn how to become "Junior Rangers." This year revegetation staff assisted with three Junior Ranger Days by providing plants and assisting Junior Rangers with planting them within the Seawall Campground Area (Sites 49 and 51) and at Thompson Island Restroom (Site 55). Revegetation staff determined which sites would be planted and provided tools, fertilizer, and peat moss. NATIVE PLANT NURSERY The native plant nursery behind Sand Beach was actively maintained between May and October. In May, all plants under the lathe house were organized according to species and pot size. The plant material was weeded and those that did not survive the winter were disposed of. The field surrounding the nursery was cleaned of debris. Branches and leaves were picked up, garbage was collected, and the grass was
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Willows of Interior Alaska
    1 Willows of Interior Alaska Dominique M. Collet US Fish and Wildlife Service 2004 2 Willows of Interior Alaska Acknowledgements The development of this willow guide has been made possible thanks to funding from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service- Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge - order 70181-12-M692. Funding for printing was made available through a collaborative partnership of Natural Resources, U.S. Army Alaska, Department of Defense; Pacific North- west Research Station, U.S. Forest Service, Department of Agriculture; National Park Service, and Fairbanks Fish and Wildlife Field Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior; and Bonanza Creek Long Term Ecological Research Program, University of Alaska Fairbanks. The data for the distribution maps were provided by George Argus, Al Batten, Garry Davies, Rob deVelice, and Carolyn Parker. Carol Griswold, George Argus, Les Viereck and Delia Person provided much improvement to the manuscript by their careful editing and suggestions. I want to thank Delia Person, of the Yukon Flats National Wildlife Refuge, for initiating and following through with the development and printing of this guide. Most of all, I am especially grateful to Pamela Houston whose support made the writing of this guide possible. Any errors or omissions are solely the responsibility of the author. Disclaimer This publication is designed to provide accurate information on willows from interior Alaska. If expert knowledge is required, services of an experienced botanist should be sought. Contents
    [Show full text]
  • A Walk in the Park and Silver Maple, with the Best Features of Each
    11. Autumn Blaze Maple (Acer x Freemanii) 16. Northern Red Oak (Quercus rubra ) Memorial Tree. This tree is a hybrid cross of red Similar in size to the white oak but has leaves A Walk in the Park and silver maple, with the best features of each. that have 5-11 lobes with pointed tips Freeman maple cultivars typically grow fast and tapered from a broad base. Acorn is 1 inch Nature’s Canopy at have deeply lobed leaves with good structural long, with shallow cup and bitter taste. A Maple Street Park stability, and great fall color (like the red maple). It tree can produce 1,500 acorns annually. Bark grows well in challenging urban conditions. is smooth on young trees, has unbroken Essex Junction, Vermont vertical ridges on older ones. It needs lots of 12. White Pine (Pinus strobus ) A stately tree that is sunlight and is competitive on sandy soils. the only pine in the East with 5 needles in each Not a common city tree because it is difficult bundle. It reaches heights of 140 ft. and lives up to to grow successfully from a seedling. Wildlife 20 years. In pre-revolutionary times they were the love it because of the nutrients its acorns used for ship masts. It is often split into multiple provide. Red oak is a key host of gypsy stems high up due to the feeding of the terminal moths. bud by the white pine weevil ( Pissodes strobe ). Trees with this form are called cabbage pines. 17. Paper Birch (Betula papyrifera ) A pioneer 13.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Moose (Alces Alces) Browsing on Paper Birch (Betula Papyrifera) Mor- Phology and Potential Timber Quality
    Silva Fennica 45(2) research articles SILVA FENNICA www.metla.fi/silvafennica · ISSN 0037-5330 The Finnish Society of Forest Science · The Finnish Forest Research Institute Impacts of Moose (Alces alces) Browsing on Paper Birch (Betula papyrifera) Mor- phology and Potential Timber Quality Roy V. Rea Rea, R.V. 2011. Impacts of Moose (Alces alces) browsing on paper birch (Betula papyrifera) morphology and potential timber quality. Silva Fennica 45(2): 227–236. Although moose browsing effects on the growth and morphology of birch are well studied, effects of moose browsing on potential timber quality of birch have received little attention. Here, an assessment was made of the impacts of moose (Alces alces L.) damage to Paper Birch (Betula papyrifera Marsh.) trees from a 20-year old clear cut area in a sub-boreal spruce forest within the Aleza Lake Research Forest, near Prince George, British Columbia, Canada. Specifically, differences in overall tree architecture and in the internal characteristics of trees that had been severely damaged and suppressed by moose winter browsing were compared to birch trees that had not been damaged by moose in this way and were considered free-to- grow. The average stem diameter, number of annular growth rings, and height of stem breaks made by moose on suppressed birches at the point of breakage was 17.9 ± 6.6 mm, 4.6 ± 1.2, and 141.8 ± 32.0 cm, respectively. Stem diameters and the heights above-the-ground of stem breaks made by moose during sequential breakage events were not significantly different (all p ≥ 0.05) from one another.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Growth and Light Interception of Balsam Fir and White Birch Saplings Following Precommercial Thinning D Pothier, a Margolis
    Analysis of growth and light interception of balsam fir and white birch saplings following precommercial thinning D Pothier, A Margolis To cite this version: D Pothier, A Margolis. Analysis of growth and light interception of balsam fir and white birch saplings following precommercial thinning. Annales des sciences forestières, INRA/EDP Sciences, 1991, 48 (2), pp.123-132. hal-00882742 HAL Id: hal-00882742 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00882742 Submitted on 1 Jan 1991 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Original article Analysis of growth and light interception of balsam fir and white birch saplings following precommercial thinning D Pothier A Margolis Centre de Recherche en Biologie Forestière, Faculté de Foresterie et de Géomatique, Université Laval, Ste-Foy, Québec, Canada G1K 7P4, (418) 656-7120 (Received 14 May 1990; accepted 15 January 1990) Summary — A precommercial thinning was conducted on young balsam fir (Abies balsamea (L) Mill) and white birch (Betula papyrifera Marsh) trees. Changes in light environment and growth re- sponse of the trees were followed during the next 2 growing seasons. The relative growth rate (RGR) of thinned balsam firs increased during both the first and the second growing season.
    [Show full text]
  • Wood Identification of Commercially Important North American Species of Birch (Betula)
    IAWA Bulletin n.s., Vol. 10 (4), 1989: 364-373 WOOD IDENTIFICATION OF COMMERCIALLY IMPORTANT NORTH AMERICAN SPECIES OF BIRCH (BETULA) by Regis B. Miller and Eric Cahow USDA Forest Service. Forest Products Laboratory, One Gifford Pinchot Drive, Madison, WI 53705-2398, U. S. A. Summary The wood anatomy was studied of the key, however, was not incorporated into text­ four commercially important North American books or later cited by authors. Panshin and species of birch: Betula alleghaniensis, B. De Zeeuw (1970, 1980) and Panchin et al. lenta, B. nigra, and B. papyrifera. Although (1964) grouped five North American tree the wood from these species is fairly homo­ species of birch and made no mention of geneous. it appears that B. papyrifera can be diagnostic features for species separation. separated from B. nigra; B. alleghaniensis Core et al. (1976, 1979) stated ‘the various and B. lenta, though indistinguishable from birches cannot be separated.’ To determine if each other, can be separated from both B. reliable diagnostic features are present to papyrifera and B. nigra. The diagnostic fea­ separate species or species groups, we stud­ tures are as follows: ray width, ray and ray ied the wood anatomy of the following four cell shape as viewed on the tangential longi­ commercially important North American spe­ tudinal section, average number of bars per cies of birch: yellow birch, B. alleghaniensis perforation plate, and contents of axial paren­ Britton (= B. lutea Michx. f.); sweet birch, chyma cells. In addition to these species, two B. lenta L.; river birch, B. nigra L.; and pa­ commercially important European species (B.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetland Forest Habitat Type Classification System for Northern
    (Photo from Department of Natural Resources Archives) Region 2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Region 2 encompasses Bayfield and Douglas Counties. The entire region was glaciated during the last part of the Wisconsin Glaciation. It can be characterized by four distinct ecological landscapes: the Superior Coastal (Clay Plain) bordering Lake Superior and extending to a maximum of 15 miles inland, the Northwest Sands extending across the region in a belt of outwash sands and gravel from southwest to northeast, the North Central Forest, and Northwest Lowlands. Region 2: Bayfield and Douglas Counties Section 3: Region 2 • 2-1 (Photo from Kemp Natural Resources Station Archives) This region, with its variety of landscapes, has a mix of forested wetlands as a reflection of it variety in soils and landscape. Boreal swamp conifer (balsam, cedar, black spruce) exist on the clay, nutrient poor peatland of black spruce and tamarack on the sandy outwash and some black ash swamps on deep organic muck soils. WETLAND FOREST HABITAT TYPES OF REGION 2 PmLLe • Picea-Larix/Ledum • Black Spruce-Tamarack/Labrador Tea PmLNe • Picea-Larix/Nemopanthus • Black Spruce-Tamarack/Mountain Holly ThAbFnIx • Thuja-Abies-Fraxinus/Ilex • Northern White Cedar-Balsam Fir-Black Ash/ Winterberry FnAbI • Fraxinus-Abies/Impatiens • Black Ash-Balsam Fir/Spotted Touch-me-not Section 3: Region 2 • 2-2 REGION 2 Key to Wetland Habitat Types (Scientific Names) 1 Two or more present: Rubus pubescens • Onoclea sensibilis • Caltha palustris • Athyrium filix-femina • Fraxinus nigra YES NO 2 3 Any of These these present: dominant or Athyrium filix-femina common: Ribes spp. Sphagnum spp. Arisaema spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Classification and Mapping Project Report
    U.S. Geological Survey-National Park Service Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park, Maine Project Report Revised Edition – October 2003 Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the U. S. Department of the Interior, U. S. Geological Survey. USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park U.S. Geological Survey-National Park Service Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park, Maine Sara Lubinski and Kevin Hop U.S. Geological Survey Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center and Susan Gawler Maine Natural Areas Program This report produced by U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center 2630 Fanta Reed Road La Crosse, Wisconsin 54603 and Maine Natural Areas Program Department of Conservation 159 Hospital Street 93 State House Station Augusta, Maine 04333-0093 In conjunction with Mike Story (NPS Vegetation Mapping Coordinator) NPS, Natural Resources Information Division, Inventory and Monitoring Program Karl Brown (USGS Vegetation Mapping Coordinator) USGS, Center for Biological Informatics and Revised Edition - October 2003 USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Acadia National Park Contacts U.S. Department of Interior United States Geological Survey - Biological Resources Division Website: http://www.usgs.gov U.S. Geological Survey Center for Biological Informatics P.O. Box 25046 Building 810, Room 8000, MS-302 Denver Federal Center Denver, Colorado 80225-0046 Website: http://biology.usgs.gov/cbi Karl Brown USGS Program Coordinator - USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Phone: (303) 202-4240 E-mail: [email protected] Susan Stitt USGS Remote Sensing and Geospatial Technologies Specialist USGS-NPS Vegetation Mapping Program Phone: (303) 202-4234 E-mail: [email protected] Kevin Hop Principal Investigator U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Trees to Avoid Planting in the Midwest and Some Excellent Alternatives
    Trees to Avoid Planting in the Midwest and Some Excellent Alternatives Dr. Laura G. Jull Dept. of Horticulture, UW-Madison Trees provide us with many environmental, aesthetic, functional, and economic benefits. Tree selection is one of the most important considerations when a homeowner, nurserymen, or landscaper is deciding what species to grow or plant. Many questions need to be answered including size, location, site characteristics, aesthetic features, pest susceptibility, hardiness, and maintenance considerations. Some trees can become a maintenance headache due to their inherent pest problems or lack of structural integrity. The trees represented in this story have not generally performed well in urban and suburban areas of the Midwest. Some are susceptible to insects and diseases, and some have severe structural problems such as being weak- wooded or prone to girdling roots or included bark formation. Others have cultural problems such as intolerance to high pH, road salt, drought, and poor drainage. A few tree species are invasive and should be avoided near sensitive areas or seed dispersal into woodlands could occur. Some of these trees may do quite well in other parts of the U.S., so my intention is not to apply a blanket statement for all these trees to all situations. Invasiveness and pest susceptibility can vary geographically. The article is based on more than 25 years of field experience and data collected from numerous states’ plant disease and insect diagnostic clinics, and conversations with arborists, nurseries, landscapers, and extension personnel. There are alternative species that can be used and are mentioned here. These alternative tree species have performed well in USDA Cold Hardiness Zone 4b.
    [Show full text]
  • Acadia National Park Revegetation Program 2006 Annual Summary
    i J ACADIA NATIONAL PARK REVEGETATION PROGRAM 2006 ANNUAL SUMMARY By Geneva E. Langley 2006 Acadia National Park Natural Resources Report 2006-15 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY \ 1 INTRODUCTION \ 2 PERSONNEL\3 11 LI VOLUNTEER GROUPS \ 3 11 NATIVE PLANT NURSERY \ 4 i j NRCS ACTIVITIES \ 4 REVEGETATION SITE MAP AND KEY 2006 \ 5-6 2006 REVEGETATION SITE SUMMARIES \ 7 NEW SITES \ 7 153 Blackwoods Campground Rehabilitation Project \ 7 Blackwoods A Loop (Sites 11-152) \ 7 Blackwoods BLoop \ 144 Blackwoods Group Sites \ 147 Blackwoods Utilities \ 151 154 Lower Mountain Roadside \ 168 155 Thunder Hole Gift Shop \ 168 156 Sieur de Monts Walkway \ 169 157 Sieur de Monts Nature Center \ 169 158 Cadillac Summit Accessibility Trail \ 170 159 Fabbri Restroom \ 171 SITES REQUIRING ADDITIONAL PLANTINGS \ 172 154 Blackwoods Campground Rehabilitation Project \ 172 133 Seawall Campground Rehabilitation Project \ 176 95 Frazer Point \ 178 103 Precipice Slope \ 179 113 Kebo Connector TraillLoop Road \ 179 116 Fabbri Overlook \ 180 130 Sieur de Monts Restroom \ 180 132 Beehive Trailhead \ 181 137 Duck Brook Bridge \ 181 I . 139 Jordan Pond Dam Bridge \ 182 I 140 Waterfall Bridge \ 182 142 Hemlock Bridge \183 143 Amphitheater Bridge \ 183 146 TriadlDay Mountain Carriage Road Bridge \ 184 147 Western Point Wall \ 184 148 EchoLake Restroom \ 185 149 Schoodic Point Restroom \ 186 I j OTHER SITE WORK \ 187 160 Flying Mountain Trail \ 187 161 Giant Slide Trail \ 188 162 Beech Cliff Trail \ 189 163 Long Pond Trail \ 190 164 Bubble Pond Carriage Road Bridge \ 191 . flI • 165 Jordan Pond Carry Trail \ 192 t j 166 Park Loop Road Roadsides \ 193 167 Deer Brook Trail \ 193 ['I I ! !.
    [Show full text]
  • Betula Papyrifera Paper Birch1 Edward F
    Fact Sheet ST-96 November 1993 Betula papyrifera Paper Birch1 Edward F. Gilman and Dennis G. Watson2 INTRODUCTION A native to northern areas that is grown for its beautiful white bark (Fig. 1). An additional ornamental trait is the yellow fall leaf color. The tree is best adapted to wet and moist sites -- watch out for pests if grown in an unsuitable site. The tree will grow to 50 feet or more and spread about half that amount. Paper birch has excellent cold tolerance and will grow in USDA hardiness zone 2. It is rarely successful in zones warmer than USDA hardiness zone six. In landscapes it may be grown as a single stemmed tree or in a multi-stemmed clump. GENERAL INFORMATION Scientific name: Betula papyrifera Pronunciation: BET-yoo-luh pap-ih-RIFF-er-uh Common name(s): Paper Birch, Canoe Birch Family: Betulaceae USDA hardiness zones: 3 through 6 (Fig. 2) Origin: native to North America Uses: specimen Availability: somewhat available, may have to go out of the region to find the tree Figure 1. Young Paper Birch. DESCRIPTION Foliage Height: 45 to 60 feet Spread: 20 to 35 feet Leaf arrangement: alternate (Fig. 3) Crown uniformity: irregular outline or silhouette Leaf type: simple Crown shape: oval Leaf margin: double serrate Crown density: moderate Leaf shape: ovate Growth rate: medium Leaf venation: pinnate Texture: fine 1. This document is adapted from Fact Sheet ST-96, a series of the Environmental Horticulture Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Publication date: November 1993.
    [Show full text]
  • "Big Tree – Paper Birch"
    "Big Tree – Paper Birch" By Anne Krantz, NH Big Tree Team UNH Cooperative Extension Paper birch, also known as canoe birch and white birch, is prized for its distinctive peeling white bark. It’s popular as both an ornamental landscaping tree and a striking woodland tree – its snow white trunks brightening up the forest. The light, waterproof, and durable bark provided the Native Americans with a material they used in many ingenious ways, from the classic birch bark canoes to covering for wigwams, and decay proof containers. The peels of papery bark provide reliable tinder in the wettest weather and the hard wood is an excellent fuel wood. Today the decorative bark is a popular material for New Hampshire souvenir items – baskets, bowls, candle holders. Collect bark only from fallen trees, as stripping the white bark from live trees leaves a permanent black patch. The fine-grained, light-colored wood is used today for everything from clothes pins and Popsicle sticks to furniture and decorative wooden ware. As saplings, paper birches don’t have white bark. They are disguised for about their first decade with indistinctive brown bark that makes them difficult to identify. When the trees are about 10 years old, 15-20 feet tall and two to three inches in diameter, the brown, papery layers begin to peel off revealing the unexpected, fresh white bark beneath. The New Hampshire legislature declared the paper birch (betula papyrifera) the Granite State's official tree in 1947 on the suggestion of the New Hampshire Federation of Garden Clubs, who noted that: ‘There are several reasons for choosing the paper birch for the state tree.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Alder Is the Most Common Hard- Wood in the Pacific Northwest and the Largest of the American Alders
    Red An American Wood United States Department of Agriculture Alder FS-215 Red alder is the most common hard- wood in the Pacific Northwest and the largest of the American alders. It is a fast-growing, pioneer species and has nitrogen-fixing nodules on its roots. The wood is diffuse-porous, moderately light, and soft. It has excellent turning and polishing characteristics and takes glue, paint, and stain well. Major uses are for furniture, cabinets, and pallets, but substantial amounts are also used to make paper. F-320966 An American Wood Red Alder (Alnus rubra Bong.) Constance A. Harrington1 Distribution The range of red alder extends from southern California (latitude 34 ° N.) to southeastern Alaska (60 ° N.) (fig. 1). Red alder is not commonly found east of the Cascade or Sierra Nevada Ranges, although there are several isolated populations in northern Idaho. The species develops best at low eleva- tions (below 1,500 ft) in northern Oregon, Washington, and British Co- lumbia. In the central part of its range, scattered trees occur as high as 3,300 feet, but most stands are below 2,500 feet. Red alder grows in humid or superhumid climatic conditions. Throughout the tree’s range, annual precipitation varies from 16 to 220 inches, with most falling as rain during winter. Low winter temperatures and lack of precipitation during the growing season appear to be the main limits to the range of the species. For good tree development, annual precipitation should exceed 25 inches, or tree roots should have access to ground water. The best stands grow on deep, well- drained loams or sandy loams of alluvial or volcanic origin.
    [Show full text]