DOCSLIB.ORG

Onondaga County Lakeview Am

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Onondaga County Lakeview Am DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE LAKEVIEW AMPHITHEATER Onondaga County, New York Lead Agency: Onondaga County 401 Montgomery Street Room 407 Court House Syracuse, New York 13202 Contact: David Coburn Phone: (315) 435-2647 Prepared By: C&S Companies 499 Col. Eileen Collins Boulevard Syracuse, New York 13212 Contact: Bob Palladine Phone: (315) 455-2000 and Environmental Design & Research, Landscape Architecture, Engineering & Environmental Services, D.P.C. 217 Montgomery Street, Suite 1000 Syracuse, New York 13202 Contact: Ben Brazell Phone: (315) 471-0688 Date Accepted by Lead Agency: July 1, 2014 Online Access: http://www.ongov.net/environment/amphitheater.html Public Comment Period: July 9, 2014 – August 11, 2014 Public Hearing: July 23, 2014; 11:00 a.m.; Legislative Chambers (Room 407 Court House) TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS .......................................................................................................... viii FIRMS/ORGANIZATIONS INVOLVED IN THE PREPARATION OF THE DEIS .......................................... ix 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION ....................................................................................... 10 2.1 SITE DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED ACTION ......................................................... 14 2.3 PROJECT PURPOSE, NEED, AND BENEFITS .......................................................................... 14 2.4 PROJECT CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION ........................................................................ 15 2.4.1 Pre-Construction Activities .................................................................................................... 15 2.4.2 Site Construction .................................................................................................................. 16 2.5 REVIEWS, APROVALS, AND OTHER COMPLIANCE DETERMINATIONS ............................... 17 2.5.1 SEQR Process ...................................................................................................................... 18 2.5.2 Agency and Public Review ................................................................................................... 20 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS, POTENTIAL IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION MEASURES ...................... 23 3.1 GEOLOGY, SOILS, AND TOPOGRAPHY ................................................................................... 23 3.1.1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................... 23 3.1.1.1 Geology............................................................................................................................. 23 3.1.1.2 Soils .................................................................................................................................. 23 3.1.1.3 Topography ....................................................................................................................... 24 3.1.2 Potential Impacts .................................................................................................................. 24 3.1.2.1 Construction ...................................................................................................................... 24 3.1.2.2 Operation .......................................................................................................................... 24 3.1.3 Proposed Mitigation .............................................................................................................. 25 3.2 WATER RESOURCES ................................................................................................................. 26 3.2.1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................... 26 3.2.1.1 Surface Waters ................................................................................................................. 26 3.2.1.2 Wetlands ........................................................................................................................... 27 3.2.1.3 Groundwater ..................................................................................................................... 28 3.2.1.4 Floodplains and Floodways ............................................................................................... 29 3.2.1.5 Stormwater ........................................................................................................................ 29 3.2.2 Potential Impacts .................................................................................................................. 30 3.2.2.1 Construction ...................................................................................................................... 30 3.2.2.2 Operation .......................................................................................................................... 31 3.2.3 Proposed Mitigation .............................................................................................................. 31 3.3 CLIMATE AND AIR QUALITY ...................................................................................................... 32 3.3.1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................... 32 3.3.1.1 Climatic Conditions ........................................................................................................... 32 3.3.1.2 Air Quality ......................................................................................................................... 33 3.3.2 Potential Impacts .................................................................................................................. 34 3.3.2.1 Construction ...................................................................................................................... 34 3.3.2.2 Operation .......................................................................................................................... 35 3.3.3 Proposed Mitigation .............................................................................................................. 35 3.3.3.1 Construction ...................................................................................................................... 35 3.3.3.2 Operation .......................................................................................................................... 37 Draft Environmental Impact Statement ii Lakeview Amphitheater 3.4 BIOLOGICAL, TERRESTRIAL, AND AQUATIC ECOLOGY ........................................................ 37 3.4.1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................... 37 3.4.1.1 Vegetation ......................................................................................................................... 37 3.4.1.2 Fish and Wildlife ................................................................................................................ 42 3.4.2 Potential Impacts .................................................................................................................. 56 3.4.2.1 Construction ...................................................................................................................... 56 3.4.2.2 Operation .......................................................................................................................... 60 3.4.3 Proposed Mitigation .............................................................................................................. 62 3.4.3.1 Vegetation ......................................................................................................................... 62 3.4.3.2 Fish and Wildlife ................................................................................................................ 63 3.4.3.3 Threatened and Endangered Species............................................................................... 64 3.5 VISUAL AND AESTHETIC RESOURCES ................................................................................... 65 3.5.1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................... 65 3.5.1.1 Visually Sensitive Resources ............................................................................................ 66 3.5.2 Potential Impacts .................................................................................................................. 71 3.5.2.1 Construction ...................................................................................................................... 71 3.5.2.2 Operation .......................................................................................................................... 71 3.5.3 Mitigation .............................................................................................................................. 78 3.6 HISTORIC, CULTURAL, AND ARCHEOLOGICAL RESOURCES ............................................... 79 3.6.1 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................................... 79
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Brownfield Cleanup Program Citizen Participation Plan for the Smith Building
    Brownfield Cleanup Program Citizen Participation Plan for The Smith Building July 2020 BCP Site #C734148 500 Erie Boulevard East City of Syracuse Onondaga County, New York www.dec.ny.gov Contents Section Page Number 1. What is New York’s Brownfield Cleanup Program? ............................................. 3 2. Citizen Participation Activities................................................................................ 3 3. Major Issues of Public Concern .............................................................................. 8 4. Site Information ........................................................................................................ 9 5. Investigation and Cleanup Process ..................................................................... 10 Appendix A - Project Contacts and Locations of Reports and Information ...................................................................................................... 14 Appendix B - Site Contact List ................................................................................... 15 Appendix C - Site Location Map................................................................................. 17 Appendix D - Brownfield Cleanup Program Process ............................................... 19 * * * * * Note: The information presented in this Citizen Participation Plan was current as of the date of its approval by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Portions of this Citizen Participation Plan may be revised during the site’s investigation
    [Show full text]
  • “From Clean Lake to 'Witch's Brew'” Robert W. Andrews Syracuse Post
    MEDIA CONSTRUCTIONS OF SUSTAINABILITY: FINGER LAKES STUDENT READING ONONDAGA LAKE LESSON 23, ACTIVITY 1 “From Clean Lake to ‘Witch’s Brew’” Robert W. Andrews Syracuse Post-Standard first in a five-part series Onondaga Lake: October 14, 1985 A Paradise Lost? On the west shore of Onondaga Lake, a shorter. Another, in the ‘60s, suggested it be terraced hillside of chalky chemical waste rises filled with garbage. 80 feet above the barren shore. Scattered patches of tangled brush cling to the white, Onondaga Lake and its west shore: abandoned, spongy slope. written off, and neglected. It is quiet here, and desolate. yet less than a How did it happen? And can such a lake ever be football field away, cars and trucks rush past on clean again? Interstate 690. Across the way is the village of Liverpool. And off to the right, across the water, During months of research and discussions with are the city skyline and the Carrier Dome. dozens of scientists, bureaucrats, politicians, and people who know the lake, The Post- It was along this shore in the 1890s that many Standard sought answers about Onondaga Lake of the grand resorts and hotels flourished, – about its past, its present, and its future. drawing thousands for weekend recreation – swimming, fishing, dancing, watching Among the answers that emerged: vaudeville or just enjoying the rides, games, • Allied Chemical Co., once Solvay Process and grand times. Co., is by far the lake’s worst polluter. One by one, the west shore resorts lost their When the company began producing soda ash allure.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions from Faith Heritage to Common Athletic Venues
    Directions from Faith Heritage to Common Athletic Venues Following are directions from the school to common opponent athletic venues. Not every away site will be listed, but the following list will cover almost all regular season games. Directions to Baldwinsville 29 East Oneida Street, B’ville 81 North to 690 West to Van Buren Road exit. Turn right on Van Buren, go about 1 mile and turn left on Route 48. Go through the 4 corners and turn right onto Oneida Street. The entrance to the B’ville campus is just ahead on the left. _____________________________________________________________ Directions to Bishop Grimes 6653 Kirkville Road, East Syracuse 481 North to Kirkville Road exit. Take Kirkville Road West and go through the first intersection. Bishop Grimes is immediately past the intersection on the right. Enter the gym from the parking lot behind the school. Fields are behind the school. ________________________________________________________________________ Directions to Bishop Ludden 815 Fay Road, Syracuse Route 173 West (West Seneca Turnpike) up Onondaga Hill. Stay on 173 at the top of the hill. 2.7 Miles, take right hand fork onto Fay Road (at split Rock-near Immanuel Nazarene Church). 1 Mile to Bishop Ludden. ________________________________________________________________________ Directions to Blessed Virgin Mary (BVM) 2656 Warners Road, Warners, NY 81 North to 690 West to the Camillus bypass (Route 695, which turns into Route 5), just past the state fairgrounds. Take the exit for Newport Road. Turn right onto Newport. Go about 3 miles on Newport (this will include a right hand turn – stay on Newport – at about 2 miles). Turn right on Warners Road/Route 173.
    [Show full text]
  • Solvay Process Company and a Portion of the Village of Solvay Which Grew up Company to Use Their Process
    :«:..' :•' Telephone 2-3111 Telephone 2-3111 SYRACUSE JOTJRNAIi Saturday, July 28, 193C Page 8 - SOLVAY PROCESS AMONG STATE'S MIGHTIEST PLANTS MUM) NIK BURNS BRIGHTLY AIRVIEW OF THE SOLVAY PROCESS PLANT WHICH GREW FROM WILLIAM COGSWELL'S IDEA N HISTORY OF VAST IRKS j (This is the fifth of a series of articles whhb willjg <«.»r weklv in the Saturday edition of The Syracuse • ^ourZ^topermitSyracusaJto become iamiliar with the journal, to P"™;*' industrial and commercial enter- inside story of the great industrial a™ * develoo- \ prises which have played important parts in the develop lent of the city.) _ By BICHAKD B. WELCH. Bountiful Nature which supplied Syracuse with huge qnan- Itie* of salt and limestone coupled with the lewdness 0£ a Central New Yorker who saw the l-kto»tta.-* •btainahle raw materials gave Syracuse the.S*j'««- r^™*™™ ATIP of the largest heavy industries in the state. C°T^»M£nk of the history of the Solvay Process r™J»,»T« * subsidiary of the Allied Chemical and Dye Corp- STCE* tSTo William Browne Cog^eUmw, brain tie idea' of utilizing the resources of this section first KenXhdcredit for the formation and progress' »* tfe ^|My industry must also go to Bow and1 Hazard first P^nt tfthe company, and his son, Frederick B. Hazard, who succeeded him. SH; names which burn brightly in the industrial history 01 SMrCCog^ell was born in Oswego, Sept 22,1834 of a lixie- ,ge which dated back to Sir John Cogswell in If5- He was educated in Hamilton Academy at Oneida and in private schools of Syracuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2017.Pmd
    Town of Geddes, 1000 Woods Road, Solvay, NY 13209 www.townofgeddes.com Summer 2017 INSIDE THIS ISSUE: Town of Geddes • Recreation Program and News - Summer Playground Program - Summer Concert Series Summer Concert - Trips and more! • News from the Town Departments Series - Recycling and Garbage Guidelines Concerts are Thursdays from 6:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. - Construction Debris & Brush Pickup Rules, etc. July 13 .......... Mario DeSantis Orchestra ...................................Variety At Woods Road Gazebo, Solvay • Senior Citizens Corner Co-Sponsor: Solvay Bank • Community News July 20 .......... Soda Ash Six ...................................................... Dixieland At Cherry Road School, Westvale Co-Sponsor: Lakeland Winery YOUTH LACROSSE CLINIC – July 27 .......... The Rhythm Method ............................................... Rock GIRLS & BOYS AGES 4 TO 8 At Lakeland Park, Lakeland This is an introductory lacrosse program for children ages 4-8 years of age. No Co-Sponsor: Pope’s Grove Golf Course pads and helmets are required. All drills are done with a soft lacrosse ball, so all drills Aug. 3 ........... The Other Guise Band ................................ Oldies/Rock are kid-friendly. Each child must provide his or her own stick. Due to ER Youth At Woods Road Gazebo, Solvay Lacrosse being unable to offer their program this summer, we are offering this program. Aug. 10 ......... Fritz’s Polka Band ................................................Variety Monday through Friday, July 17 to 21 from 6:00 to 7:00 p.m. At Lakeland Park, Lakeland Cherry Road School Field Aug. 17 ......... Flyin’ Column .................................................. Irish, Folk Fee: $25 Geddes residents, $30 nonresidents At Cherry Road School, Westvale Instructors: Camille and Clara O’Kane, Co-Sponsor: Geddes Federal Savings & Loan OCC Lazers Womens’ Lacrosse team members FOR MORE INFORMATION, CALL GEDDES RECREATION DEPT.
    [Show full text]
  • 3. Site Description (Fwia Step I)
    ~ 3. SITE DESCRIPTION(FWIA STEPI) ~ '" This section of the BERA addresses the requirements of Step I ofNYSDEC's Fish and Wildlife Impact Analysis (FWIA) for Inactive Hazardous Waste Sites. According to NYSDEC (1994a), the objectives of Step I are to: . Identify the fish and wildlife resources that presently exist at the site and that existed there before contaminant introduction. Provide information necessary for the design of a remedial investigation (RI). Step I of the FWIA (NYSDEC, 1994a) includes preparation of various site maps, description offish and wildlife resources, description of fish and wildlife resource values, and identification of applicable fish and wildlife regulatory criteria. The contents of this section are also consistent with the component of Ecological Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund (ERAGS) Step 1 (see Chapter 4) that addresses the environmental setting (USEPA, 1997a). 3.1 Site Maps The site maps required for Step I of a FWIA include topographic, wetland, drainage, and covertype (NYSDEC, 1994a). The topographic map for the site is presented in Figure 3-1 and includes the following information: . Demarcation of the 2-mi (3.2-km) area around the site. Topographic features. Surface waters (i.e., streams and lakes). Stateand federal wetlands. General locations of rare plant species and communities listed in the New York Natural Heritage Program (NYNHP) database. Roads and settlements (urban and residential). As required by FWIA guidance, a drainage map depicting surface flows after hydrological events is presented in Figure 3-2. Wetlands regulated by NYSDEC and those documented by the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) are presented in Figure 3-3, and are discussed in detail in Section 3.2.4.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Introduction
    1. INTRODUCTION Honeywell Intemational Inc. (fonnerly AlliedSignal, Inc.; referred to herein as Honeywell), is conducting aremedial investigation and feasibility study (RI/FS) for Onondaga Lake, which is located near S)'Tacuse, New York (site definition is discussed in Section 1.2 of this RI). The RIfFS is being conducted under the direction of the State ofN ew York and pursuant to the terms of a Consent Decree (Index #89-CV -815) entered into with the State of New York dated January 9, 1992, and associated stipulations (Consent Decree). Onondaga Lake was placed on the USEP A National Priorities List (NFL) (CERCLIS ill number NYD986913580) on December 16, 1994. This NPL listing means that the lake is among the nation's highest priorities for remedial evaluation and responseunder the federal Superfillld law for ~iteswhere there has been a release ofhazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants. Honeywell submitted a draft RI report in May 1998. Upon review and comment by the US Environmental Protection Agency (USEP A), the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC), and the New York State Department of Health (NYSDOH), the NYSDEC and the New York State Department of Law (NYSDOL) disapproved this draft document and provided comments to Ho~eywell in August 1999. After completing additional sampling in 1999 and 2000, Honeywell submitted a revised RI report in April 2001 (Exponent, 2001 c). This revised report was similarly disapproved by NYSDEC and NYSDOL in July 2001. Thereafter, pursuant to the Consent Decree, NYSDEC/T AMS Consultants, Inc. (TAMS) prepared this reMite of Honeywell' s revised RI report, with the assistance ofNYSDOH and USEP A.
    [Show full text]
  • Focus on Onondaga Lake
    F.O.C.U.S. O N ON O NDAGA LAKE A roadmap to facilitate reconnecting the lake with the community Photo courtesy of Parsons Corporation Prepared by F.O.C.U.S. Greater Syracuse, Inc. December 2012 F.O.C.U.S. on Onondaga Lake December 2012 F.O.C.U.S. ON ONONDAGA LAKE: A ROADMAP TO FACILITATE REcoNNECTING THE LAKE WITH THE COMMUNITY DECEMBER 2012 Prepared by: F.O.C.U.S. Greater Syracuse, Inc. City Hall Commons 201 E. Washington Street; Suite 704 Syracuse, New York 13202 www.focussyracuse.org [email protected] F.O.C.U.S. on Onondaga Lake December 2012 … our beautiful lake, on all its beautiful shores and borders, will present a view of one continuous villa, ornamental with its shady groves and hanging gardens and connected by a wide and “ “ splendid avenue that should encircle its entire waters, and furnish a delightful drive to the gay and prosperous citizens of the town, who will, towards the close of each summer’s day, throng it for pleasure, relaxation, or the improvement of health … — Harvey Baldwin, first mayor of Syracuse, 1847 F.O.C.U.S. on Onondaga Lake December 2012 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 1928, one of the first proposals was produced reconnect Onondaga Lake with its community, for the future of Onondaga Lake. In that report, F.O.C.U.S. felt it was obligated to deliver on it stated that Onondaga Lake would never be behalf of the hundreds of thousands of Onondaga cleaned until the “public demand is strong.” It has County residents that have voiced their desire for taken more than 84 years, but for the first time a clean Onondaga Lake over the past century.
    [Show full text]
  • Phase 1A Archaeological Sensitivity Assessment
    Phase 1A Archaeological Sensitivity Assessment I-81 Viaduct Project City of Syracuse and Towns of Salina, Cicero, and Dewitt, Onondaga County, New York NYSDOT PIN 3501.60 Prepared for: Prepared by: Environmental Design & Research, Landscape Architecture, Engineering & Environmental Services, D.P.C. 217 Montgomery Street, Suite 1000 Syracuse, New York 13202 P: 315.471.0688 F: 315.471.1061 www.edrdpc.com Redacted Version - November 2016 Phase 1A Archaeological Sensitivity Assessment (redacted version) I-81 Viaduct Project City of Syracuse and Towns of Salina, Cicero, and Dewitt, Onondaga County, New York NYSDOT PIN 3501.60 Prepared for: And Prepared by: Environmental Design & Research, Landscape Architecture, Engineering, & Environmental Services, D.P.C. 217 Montgomery Street, Suite 1000 Syracuse, New York 13202 P: 315.471.0688 F: 315.471.1061 www.edrdpc.com November 2016 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY PIN: 3501.60 NYSORHP Project Review: 16PR06314 DOT Project Type: Highway demolition, reconstruction, and/or replacement Cultural Resources Survey Type: Phase 1A Archaeological Sensitivity Assessment Location Information: City of Syracuse and Towns of Salina, Cicero, and Dewitt Onondaga County Survey Area: Project Description: Reconstruction of I-81 and adjacent roadways in Syracuse, N. The Project is considering 2 alternatives – a Viaduct Alternative and Community Grid Alternative, described herein. Project Area: Area of Potential Effect (APE) for Direct Effects totals 458.9 acres USGS 7.5-Minute Quadrangle Map: Syracuse East, Syracuse West, Jamesville,
    [Show full text]
  • Onondaga Lake Educational Unit
    Onondaga Lake Educational Unit Onondaga Lake Educational Unit Supplemental Curriculum Materials for Secondary Teachers and Students in Science, Social Studies, English, and Technology Heidi Busa, John Birmingham, Richard Beal, and KBB Sobering ESF Educational Outreach 129 Bray Hall- Outreach, SUNY ESF 1 Forestry Drive Syracuse, NY 13210 (315) 470-6817 FAX (315) 470-6818 Email: [email protected] Copyright © 2004 SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry. All rights reserved. SUNY ESF 1 Onondaga Lake Educational Unit Instructor Overview The Onondaga Lake Educational Unit is a series of lessons designed to investigate issues related to Onondaga Lake. The lessons are interdisciplinary and have been correlated to the New York State Standards for Math, Science and Technology, and Social Studies; the lessons meet the needs of both teachers and students. Collaboration between teachers can show students that the issues overlap many subject areas. The impact of humans on their environment is easy to observe in the case of Onondaga Lake. The health of this important resource is severely compromised and this series of lessons investigates the many variables involved in returning it to a healthier state. The lessons may be presented in any order or used individually to emphasize topics of interest to the class. The Onondaga Lake Educational Unit is intended to illustrate how humans can impact an environment and the issues involved in correcting problems created by this impact. SUNY ESF 2 Onondaga Lake Educational Unit Onondaga Lake Educational Unit Instructor Overview Course Objective: The ESF Environmental Science Educational Units provide high school teachers with student-centered, interdisciplinary lessons that cover the New York State Standards for Math, Science, and Technology, and Social Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure 1-1. Location of Onondaga Lake S Creek E C a R L N E R E Il I V M W Lake Outlet a S
    CANADA VERMONT Lake Ontario Lake Erie NEW YORK MASSACHUSETTS PENNSYLVANIA CONNECTICUT Oswego Oneida River OSWEGO COUNTY River Oneida Lake Seneca Seneca River Cross River Cross Lake Lake Onondaga Lake SYRACUSE Ninemile Creek Green Lake FAYETTEVILLE ONONDAGA COUNTY Skaneateles MADISON COUNTY CAYUGA COUNTY CAYUGA Otisco Lake Lake CORTLAND COUNTY Source: Exponent, 2001c Figure 1-1. Location of Onondaga Lake S Creek e c a r ll n e R e i i v m w Lake Outlet a S Liverpool ,'90 k o ro B dy o Mattydale lo Onondaga B Lakeland Lake Galeville k e N e inem r ile C Cr y eek 690 e ,' L Wes t F T lum r e ib k u o ta o r Onondaga Creek r y M B 5 A e s tr e o Unnamed Creek d d East Flume e H G ar bo Syracuse Solvay r B 695 ro ,' o k Fairmount k o o r Westvale B r bo ar H ,'81 LEGEND River or brook River or brook (below grade) Major road Minor road 0 1 2 Miles 0 1 2 3 Kilometers Source: NYSDOT (no date) Modified from Exponent, 2001c Figure 1-2. Onondaga Lake Area Tributaries and Roads LEGEND Creek a Approximate Location Sawmill and Extent Lake Outlet LIVERPOOL Brook Bloody O n o n d a g a L a k e GALEVILLE Dredge Spoils Areaa LAKELAND Creek Ninemile Creek Ley Former Willis Brook In-lake West Avenue Plant Semet Waste SYRACUSE East Deposita Flume Residue Flume Ponds Tributary Onondaga Geddes 5A Creek Metro Former Mathews LCP Bridge Main Plant Brook Ave.
    [Show full text]
  • Consent Order As Appendix A
    , STATE OF NEW YORK: DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION In the Matter of the Alleged Violations of Articles 3, 11, 15, 17, 24, 27 titles 7 and 13, and Article 40 of the Environmental Conservation Law of the State ofNew York, and of Title 6 Official CONSENT Compilation of Codes, Rule and Regulations ORDER of the State ofNew York filedpursuant thereto Index No. D-7-0001-02-03 - by - Site No. 7-34-076 Honeywell International Inc., (Solvay Wastebeds 9-15) Respondent. --c---------------------- WHEREAS, 1. The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation ("the Department") is an executive department of the State of New York with jurisdiction over the environmental policy and laws of this state and has the power to provide forthe prevention and abatement of all water, land, and air pollution under, inter alia, the Environmental Conservation Law ("ECL") §3-0301.1.i. The Depaiiment is also responsible forthe enforcement ofECL articles 3, 11, 15, 17, 24, 27 titles 7 and 13, and aiiicles 40 and 71. 2. Honeywell InternationalInc., formerlyknown, in part, as AlliedSignal Inc. and the Solvay Process Company ("Respondent"), is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware and is a "person" as defined, inter alia, in ECL §§ I 7-0105(1) and 27-0303(3), and at 6 NYCRR subparts 360-1.2(b)(l 17) and 750-1.2(64). 3. Respondent owns property in New York State located in the Towns of Geddes and Camillus, Onondaga County, and identifiedby Respondent as Wastebeds 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15.
    [Show full text]