Minimizing Pesticide Risk to Bees in Fruit Crops

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Minimizing Pesticide Risk to Bees in Fruit Crops Extension Bulletin E3245 • New • May 2015 Minimizing Pesticide Risk to Bees in Fruit Crops Photos by Zachary Huang (first two, left) and Jason Gibbs (second two, right), MSU Entomology Emily May, Julianna Wilson and Rufus Isaacs. Department of Entomology, Michigan State University. INTRODUCTION SUMMARY Pollinating insects, of which bees are the most important, 1. Bees are essential for pollination of many fruit crops. contribute significantly to the yield and quality of fruit crops in the United States. Pollination services provided by bees 2. Bees and other pollinators can be harmed by some are worth billions of dollars annually to fruit crop industries pesticides used to manage insects, mites and diseases across the nation. Fruit crops vary in their need for bees to in fruit crops. deliver pollen for pollination, but most — including apples, 3. Growers can reduce pesticide risk to bees through blueberries, cherries, strawberries and raspberries — will these approaches: produce larger and more even fruit if their flowers are well - Develop and implement a pollination contract with visited by bees. For all these crops, having healthy bees your beekeeper. to provide pollination is essential for their production, so - Use integrated pest management (IPM) to reduce protecting bees from pesticide risk is an important part of the need for sprays. growing fruit crops. - Avoid pesticide sprays during crop bloom. This document provides information to help growers - Apply pesticides after sunset or before sunrise, or make informed decisions about how to minimize the risk when air temperature is below 50°F. of pesticides to bees. A list of insecticides and fungicides - Select the least toxic pesticides and formulations that are registered for use in the north central region of the when possible. United States is provided in the back of the document. - Reduce drift onto areas outside crop fields. Types of bees that provide pollination - Remove flowering weeds from crops. Fruit plantings are typically pollinated by a combination of - Provide bee-friendly habitat away from crops. wild and managed bees (Figure 1). More than 500 species of bees are present in the Midwest, and about 30 to 50 species are important contributors to the pollination of fruit crops. 2 Minimizing Pesticide Risk to Bees in Fruit Crops Figure 1. Overlap of the activity periods of various wild and managed bee species with spring crop bloom, and their potential activity periods through the rest of the season. Photos by Jason Gibbs Most fruit plantings are visited by a community of wild parasitic mites. Now fruit growers typically rent honey bee bees that live in and around the farms and gardens where hives from beekeepers for pollination and arrange to have fruit crops are grown. The main bee species managed for hives delivered when crop plants are at early bloom and pollination is the European honey bee (Apis mellifera). Some removed at petal fall. growers may also keep managed populations of solitary In addition to managed honey bees, some growers manage mason bees (Osmia species) or purchase commercially solitary mason bees (Osmia species) for pollination of available bumble bee colonies (Bombus impatiens). tree fruit. Mason bees can be induced to nest in paper or Many types of bees contribute to the pollination of fruit cardboard tubes or in holes drilled in wood, where they crops. Some of these are wild and unmanaged, providing overwinter and emerge the following spring or summer. This a natural source of pollination. Others can be managed emergence can be timed to coincide with flowering of the using nesting structures that enable growers to have a high crop, and the bees then remain active for up to 4 weeks. abundance of bees in the local area (Figure 2). Some growers purchase colonies of bumble bees from The honey bee is by far the most important species for commercial suppliers that continuously rear these bees. fruit crop pollination because hives are portable and can be Colonies are purchased in time for the pollination needs of transported into and out of fruit plantings. In the past, feral the target crop, providing an active workforce in the field or unmanaged colonies of honey bees played a major role during bloom. These colonies generally remain active for in pollination, but populations have declined because of about 6 to 8 weeks. Michigan State University Extension 3 Figure 2. Three types of managed bees that can be used to pollinate fruit crops. L-R: honey bee hives, bumble bee colonies, and mason bees. Photos by Rufus Isaacs, MSU Entomology A variety of wild bee species are active throughout the Social bees have the advantage of having many foraging growing season, and some of them are well-suited to bees across the landscape; if some bees die while foraging, provide pollination of crop flowers. Most of these species the colony is likely to have other bees available to take their cannot be commercially managed because they nest in the place. If a solitary bee is killed while foraging, there are no ground. Some have been found nesting in the grass-free other adult females that can take her place. strips under the fruit crop or in adjacent habitat. These bees can fly to blooming crop plants within their flight range. PESTICIDE EFFECTS ON BEES Pesticide application is an important consideration for both Bee biology and behavior may affect responses beekeepers and fruit growers because both have a stake to pesticides in maintaining healthy bee populations. This requires an Bee body size, nest location (above or below ground), flight integrated approach to pest management by growers, who season (what time of year the bee is active) and sociality need to control target insects while doing the least harm to (whether a bee is solitary or social) can all affect how bees the pollinators. Bees are sensitive to many of the chemicals are exposed to and affected by pesticides. used to control pests, whether on the plants that they visit Large-bodied bees, such as honey bees and bumble bees, to collect nectar and pollen or in the areas where they are can generally fly greater distances than smaller bees in nesting. search of pollen and nectar resources. Honey bees have Pollinator stewardship, as part of an overall IPM strategy, can been found to fly more than a mile in search of rewarding allow growers to manage diseases and insect pests in their flower patches, but many smaller wild bees fly no farther crop while also minimizing risk to pollinators. than the length of a football field in search of food. Larger bees may also be able to tolerate higher levels of certain Which pesticides affect bees? pesticides than smaller bees, but their broader flight range Growers use many groups of pesticides to protect their means that they cover more ground and have the potential crops, including insecticides for controlling pest insects, to be exposed to a wider variety of pesticides. miticides for pest mites, fungicides for fungal diseases and The social structure of bees is another important aspect that herbicides for weeds. These pesticides are important tools determines how they respond to pesticides. Honey bees are for managing crop pests in fruit plantings, but they may also the classic example of social bees that have a single queen pose a risk to bees. laying eggs for the colony and many adult female offspring Insecticides are the pesticides most likely to be toxic to (workers) taking care of other tasks such as caring for brood bees. Bees can be exposed to insecticides when materials and foraging for nectar and pollen. In contrast, many wild are sprayed directly onto them or drift onto or near hives, bee species are solitary, meaning that a single adult female when bees come into contact with residues on plant lays eggs, cares for offspring and makes foraging trips. surfaces, or when bees collect chemicals while foraging for 4 Minimizing Pesticide Risk to Bees in Fruit Crops food or water. By law, and as described in the restrictions Tank mixes of pesticides may cause increased risk to bees on labels, the use of insecticides toxic to bees is restricted through synergistic effects, which make the toxicity of the during crop bloom when bees are actively foraging. Each mixture greater than that of the individual components. label will provide specific guidance on the restrictions, There is evidence that fungicides in the Fungicide Resistance which are based on the insecticide’s toxicity to bees. Table 1 Action Committee (FRAC) Group 3 can make insecticides provides information on the toxicity of various insecticides more toxic to bees. More recently, laboratory studies with used in fruit crops, ranked from very low risk to high risk to newer products have demonstrated this synergism for bees. additional combinations of pesticides. Research on the Fungicides are generally considered of limited risk to impacts of tank mixes on bees and their colonies under field bees, and thus their use during bloom has been assumed conditions is still ongoing. to be relatively safe to pollinators. Recent research For all pesticide applications, be sure to follow the label suggests, however, that certain fungicides, used alone or instructions on safety to bees and other pollinators. in combination with other pesticides, can have direct or Labels can be found at www.cdms.net/. See below for indirect harmful effects on bees. They may disrupt adult bee more details. foraging behavior or, when residues are brought back to hives and fed to larvae, they can affect bee development. What is the risk? To minimize the exposure of adult and immature bees The risk of toxic effects from pesticides is a combination of to fungicides, growers should follow integrated disease the toxicity of the pesticide — its inherent ability to harm management practices including the use of risk models to a bee — and the amount of exposure that a bee receives.
Recommended publications
  • Potential Spray Drift Damage: What Steps to Take?
    [email protected] • (479) 575-7646 www.nationalaglawcenter.org An Agricultural Law Research Publication Potential Spray Drift Damage: What Steps to Take? by Tiffany Dowell Lashmet Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service This material is based upon work supported by the National Agricultural Library, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. An Agricultural & Food Law Consortium Project Potential Spray Drift Damage: What Steps to Take? Tiffany Dowell Lashmet Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Service As many farmers know all too well, applications of various pesticides can result in drift and cause damage to neighboring property owners. In recent years, incidences of spray drift damage have been frequent and well-publicized. In the event a farmer discovers damage to his or her own crop, it is important for the injured producer to know some steps to take. Document, Document, Document First and foremost, any farmer who suspects possible injury from drift should document all potential evidence, including taking photographs or samples of damaged crops or foliage, keeping a log of spray applications made by neighboring landowners, noting any custom applicators applying pesticide in the area, documenting environmental conditions like wind speed, direction, and temperatures, and getting statements from any witnesses who might have seen recent pesticide applications. Photographs should be taken continually for several days, as the full extent of damage may not occur for several weeks after application. The more documentation a landowner has, the better his chances of recovery will be; whether it is from the offender, the offender’s insurance or potentially even the injured party’s insurance.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Pesticide Drift1 F
    PI232 Managing Pesticide Drift1 F. M. Fishel and J. A. Ferrell2 Introduction may drift and whether it is harmful depends on interrelated factors that can be complex. The drift of spray from pesticide applications can expose people, plants and animals, and the environment to Drift is a significant legal concern in Florida. During pesticide residues that can cause health and environmental 2009–2010, the Florida Department of Agriculture and effects and property damage. Agricultural practices are Consumer Services (FDACS), which is the state pesticide poorly understood by the public, which causes anxiety and regulatory agency, initiated 39 investigations in response sometimes overreaction to a situation. Even the application to allegations of drift. Where significant drift does occur, of fertilizers or biological pesticides, like Bt or pheromones, it can damage or contaminate sensitive crops, poison bees, can be perceived as a danger to the general public. Drift pose health risks to humans and animals, and contaminate can lead to litigation, financially damaging court costs, soil and water in adjacent areas (Figure 1). Applicators are and appeals to restrict or ban the use of crop protection legally responsible for the damages resulting from the off- materials. Urbanization has led to much of Florida’s agri- target movement of pesticides. It is impossible to eliminate cultural production being in areas of close proximity to the drift totally, but it is possible to reduce it to a legal level. general public, including residential subdivisions, assisted The purpose of this guide is to discuss factors influencing living facilities, hospitals, and schools. Such sensitive sites drift and provide common-sense solutions for minimizing heighten the need for drift mitigation measures to be taken potential drift problems.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Organochlorine Pesticides and Metals in Ring-Tailed Lemurs (Lemur Catta) at Beza Mahafaly Special Reserve, Madagascar
    American Journal of Primatology 71:998–1010 (2009) RESEARCH ARTICLE Assessment of Organochlorine Pesticides and Metals in Ring-Tailed Lemurs (Lemur catta) at Beza Mahafaly Special Reserve, Madagascar THOMAS R. RAINWATER1Ã, MICHELLE L. SAUTHER2, KATHERINE A.E. RAINWATER3, RACHEL E. MILLS3, FRANK P. CUOZZO4, BAOHONG ZHANG1, LES N. MCDANIEL1, MICHAEL T. ABEL1, ERIC J. MARSLAND1, 5 6 7 1 MARTHA A. WEBER , IBRAHIM ANTHO YOUSSOUF JACKY , STEVEN G. PLATT , GEORGE P. COBB , AND TODD A. ANDERSON1 1Department of Environmental Toxicology, The Institute of Environmental and Human Health, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas 2Department of Anthropology, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado 3School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California 4Department of Anthropology, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, North Dakota 5Department of Animal Health and Nutrition, St. Louis Zoo, St. Louis, Missouri 6De´partement de Sciences Biologie, Universite´ de Toliara, Toliara, Madagascar 7Department of Biology, Sul Ross State University, Alpine, Texas Like most of Madagascar’s endemic primates, ring-tailed lemurs (Lemur catta) face a number of threats to their survival. Although habitat loss is of greatest concern, other anthropogenic factors including environmental contamination may also affect lemur health and survival. In this study, we examined ring-tailed lemurs from the Beza Mahafaly Special Reserve (BMSR), southern Madagascar for exposure to organochlorine (OC) pesticides and metals and examined differences in contaminant concentrations between sexes and among age groups, troops, and habitats. A total of 14 pesticides and 13 metals was detected in lemur blood (24 individuals) and hair (65 individuals) samples, respectively. p,p0-DDT, heptachlor, aldrin, heptachlor epoxide, endrin aldehyde, and endrin were among the most prevalent pesticides detected.
    [Show full text]
  • Ep 0154508 A2
    Europaisches Patentamt European Patent Office © Publication number: 0 154 508 Office europeen des brevets A2 © EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION © Application number: 85301334.0 © Int. CI.4: C 07 C 149/437 A 01 N 47/34 ^ © Date of filing: 27.02.85 © Priority: 27.02.84 JP 36882/84 © Applicant: Takeda Chemical Industries, Ltd. 27, Doshomachi 2-chome Higashi-ku Osaka-shi Osaka, 541(JP) @ Date of publication of application: 11.09.85 Bulletin 85/37 @ Inventor: Nagase, Hiroshi 19-6, Daiwahigashi 1-chome © Designated Contracting States: Kawanishi Hyogo 666-OKJP) AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI LU NL SE © Inventor: Sato, Yasuo 16-5, Ichijojihayama-cho Sakyo-ku Kyoto 606IJP) © Representative: Laredo, Jack Joseph et al, Elkington and Fife High Holborn House 52/54 High Holborn London, WC1V6SH(GB) © Thiophenylureas, their production and use. New insecticidal oriand ovicidal benzoylurea derivatives of the formula: wherein X1 is hydrogen or halogen; X2 is halogen; Y1. Y2 and Y3 are independently hydrogen, halogen or alkyl, whereby at least one of Y1, Y2 and Y3 is other than hydrogen; and R is hydrogen or a group represented by the formula -CFaZbH(3-a-d) wherein a and b are independently 0, 1, or 3, with a + b @ 3 and Z is halogen, their production and use. The present invention relates to benzoylurea derivatives of the formula: wherein X1 is hydrogen or halocgen; X2 is halogen; Y1, Y2 and Y3 are independently hydroaen, halogen or alkyl, whereby at least one of Y1, Y2 and Y3 is other than hydrogen; and R is hydrogen or a group represented by the formula -CFaZbH(3-a-b) wherein a and b are independently 0, 1, 2 or 3, with a + b < 3 and Z is halogen,which are novel compounds processina excellent insecticidal activities, to processes for producing the same, and to insecticides containing the same.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Spray Drift Workgroup
    April 17, 2007 Spray Drift Workgroup – Final Report to PPDC Executive Summary The Spray Drift workgroup to the Pesticide Program Dialogue Committee met five times over the course of the last year in response to EPA’s request for input on how to mitigate risks to water from pesticide use. The workgroup was pleased that the OW and OPP are working together on this issue. The workgroup decided to focus primarily on: • Labeling to mitigate spray drift; • The role of education, training, and stewardship; and • Practices and equipment to mitigate drift and adverse effects from drift. Issues the EPA decided were beyond the scope of this workgroup include: 1) the content of EPA’s proposed rule concerning whether use of a pesticide requires a National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit (because the rule concerned aquatic pesticide applications, not pesticide spray drift, and because the comment period for the rule was closed and it was still in internal Agency review) and 2) the off­target movement of pesticides through volatilization. In addition, the workgroup discussed “complex issues” surrounding spray drift, including: • What constitutes “harm” from spray drift? • Design standards vs. performance standards • Tailoring regulatory restrictions to local conditions, and • Determining the real world impacts of pesticide labeling The following report for each of these topics presents a summary of what the workgroup did, consensus findings, and, where possible, consensus recommendations to EPA to be considered by the full PPDC. Where consensus was not achieved, individual workgroup members provided additional comments for EPA consideration. These comments do not reflect the position of the workgroup as a whole but are included to provide EPA with a complete range of views on the topic.
    [Show full text]
  • Banners in Heraldic Art
    Banners in heraldic art Magnus Backrnark Abstract The banner is very useful to heraldic art. It is a carrier of charges and colours, just like its coun­ terpart the shield. But where the shield can be seen as crude, heavy, flat and robust - its purpose being taking hits- the banner is brilliant, swift, full of I ife and motion. Its purpose is spiritual. It is lifted above anyone's head, above dust and confusion, for inspiration and guiding. Something of this character, I will with this article try to show by examples that the heraldic artist, if lucky, can translate in his or her work. First, we could though take a quick glance at the historical development of banners. The term banner approves, as we shall see, to a specific kind of flag, but in a wide sense of the word a banner is any ensign made of a peace of cloth, carried on a staff and with symbolic value to its owner(s). The profound nature of this innovation, which seem to be of oriental origin, makes it the mother of all kinds of flags. The etymologi­ cal root of the word banner is the French word banniere, derived from latin bandaria, bandum, which has German extraction, related to gothic bandwa, bandw6, 'sign'. 1 The birth of heraldry in the l2 h century Western world was preceded by centuries of use of early forms of banners, called gonfanons. From Bysantium to Normandy, everywhere in the Christian world, these ensigns usually were small rectangular lance­ flags with tai Is (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Smells Like Teen Spirit Appears in Rock & Pop 2018
    ACCESS ALL AREAS... SMELLS LIKE TEEN SPIRIT APPEARS IN ROCK & POP 2018 Released: 1991 Album: Nevermind Label: DGC Records ABOUT THE SONG Nirvana’s Kurt Cobain was attempting to write the ‘ultimate pop song’ when he came up with the guitar riff that would become ‘Smells Like Teen Spirit’. He WITH THE LIGHTS OUT, wanted to write a song in the style of The Pixies, telling Rolling Stone in 1994: ‘I was basically trying to rip off The Pixies. I have to admit it.’ The title came IT’S LESS DANGEROUS after Kathleen Hanna, lead singer of Bikini Kill, spray- painted ‘Kurt smells like Teen Spirit’ on his bedroom “ wall. Teen Spirit was actually a brand of deodorant. HERE WE ARE NOW, The first single from Nirvana’s second album Nevermind, ‘Smells Like Teen Spirit’ was a surprise hit. The label had anticipated that ‘Come As You Are’, the follow-up single, would be the song to cross over to a mainstream audience. ‘Smells Like Teen Spirit’ ENTERTAIN US was first played on college radio before rock stations and MTV picked it up. It is widely praised as one of I FEEL STUPID AND CONTAGIOUS the greatest songs in the history of rock music. RECORDING AND PRODUCTION Cobain began writing ‘Smells Like Teen Spirit’ a few weeks before Nirvana were due in the studio to record Nevermind. After presenting the main riff and melody of the chorus to the rest of the band, they jammed around the riff for an hour and a half. Bassist Krist Novoselic slowed the verse down and drummer Dave Grohl created a drum beat and as a result, ‘Smells Like Teen Spirit’ is the only song on Nevermind to give songwriting credits to all three band members.
    [Show full text]
  • A Pesticide Decision-Making Guide to Protect Pollinators in Landscape
    A Pesticide Decision-Making Guide to Protect Pollinators in Landscape, Ornamental and Turf Management 2019 Edition By Maria van Dyke, Emma Mullen, Dan Wixted, and Scott McArt Pollinator Network at Cornell, 2018 Cornell University, Department Of Entomology Download this guide for free from: https://pollinator.cals.cornell.edu/resources/grower-resources/ Contents Choosing lower-risk pesticides for pollinators in landscape, ornamental & turf management ____ 1 How to use this guide 3 Understanding the terms in this guide 4 EPA Pesticide toxicity standards 4 Synergistic Interactions 4 Systemic Pesticides 4 Adjuvants and/or inert ingredients 5 Tying it all together: adopting an Integrated Pest and Pollinator Management (IPPM) approach 5 IPPM: Putting the “pollinator” in IPM: 6 Table 1: Product formulations and their active ingredients 7 Table 2: Pesticide synergies and acute, chronic, and sublethal toxicities for honey bees and other pollinators 10 Literature cited 25 Appendix A: Pollination contract ______________________________________________________ 29 Acknowledgments This research and development of this guide was supported by the New York State Environmental Protection Fund and New York Farm Viability Institute grant FOC 17-001. The expert advice and consultation provided by Dan Wixted of the Cornell Pesticide Management Education Program was supported by the Crop Protection and Pest Management Extension Implementation Program [grant no. 2017-70006-27142/project accession no. 1014000] from the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture. 1 Choosing lower-risk pesticides for pollinators in landscape, ornamental & turf management Managing pests on ornamentals, in landscapes, and in nurseries while protecting pollinators can be a balancing act. Pollinators (mostly bees) are busy pollinating blossoms in nurseries and landscapes at the same time growers and landscapers need to be managing specific pests and diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • Revere's Bookplates
    Revere’s Bookplates EVE RE’S engraving of bookplates is represented by eleven plates, four signed by him, four which were unquestionably his work, two which were probably his work, and one plate probably by his father, Apollos Rivoire. In general the plates are divided into two groups according to the style of the mantling. In the first group there are seven plates, three signed and four unsigned. They are almost identical, in the elaborate Chippendale style of mantling, scroll work, flowers, and motto ribbon. Revere used the same mantling many times, changing the coat-of- arms, the crest, and the name. It is probable that he used some English bookplate as his model, copying it faithfully, yet I have never located this English plate, although I have examined many thousands by English engravers. It is possible that he used his father’s Paul Rivoire plate for a model. The seven plates in the first group are as follows: Gardiner Chandler. Signed “P Revere scuip.” The coat-of-arms and the crest follow the design of the bookplate of his brother, John Chandler, Jr. (1721— i8oo), earlier engraved by Nathaniel Hurd; but the mantling is more elaborate and is distinctly Revere’s. Also the plate bears in the upper left corner the abbrevia tion “No,” with a superior “o” directly above two parallel lines, a characteristic of Revere’s bookplates and also of his colonial paper currency. Gardiner Chandler’s dates were 1723—1782 and the plate was probably engraved in the 1760’s. The original copper was long owned by Mrs.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 President's Message
    PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE by David M. Cvet Summer is upon us with a vengeance, breaking temperature records from the 1930's – at least in Toronto. The warmer weather has had some fits and starts, with warm weather followed by frost, causing newly planted peppers and tomatoes to be damaged beyond saving. However, these exciting events pale in comparison to seeing the Queen's Beasts (some depicted on the right) who will be attending the Society's formal dinner at this year's Annual General Meeting, scheduled for October 1-3, 2010 in Ottawa. The Annual Meeting itself will be held at the Delta Ottawa Hotel on Queen Street. The Saturday evening dinner will take place at the Canadian Museum of Civilization (across the Ottawa River in Gatineau, Quebec), which will provide a grand setting for our annual banquet, graced as it will be with these impressive “guests”. We are indeed grateful to David Rumball for organizing this event, and for arranging with the museum to have the Queen's Beasts available for the dinner. I encourage our members to make the necessary calendar and travel to enhance the “coolness” factor of the Society in order to attract arrangements to attend this splendid event. new members – and to retain our present ones. One important reason for having the AGM in Ottawa this year As an example, at the recent Toronto Branch AGM (combined (rather than being hosted by the Prairie Branch, as it would have with the Society's Board meeting earlier the same day) the been in the usual sequence) is the expectation that the new formal dinner at Hart House was visually recorded by a Canadian Heraldic Authority tabard (donated by the Society) photographer I had arranged as my guest.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED NATIONS Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic
    UNITED NATIONS SC UNEP/POPS/POPRC.8/INF/12 Distr.: General 14 August 2012 English only Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants Persistent Organic Pollutants Review Committee Eighth meeting Geneva, 15–19 October 2012 Item 5 (e) and (f) of the provisional agenda* Technical work: assessment of alternatives to endosulfan; assessment of alternatives to DDT Report on the assessment of chemical alternatives to endosulfan and DDT Note by the Secretariat As referred to in documents UNEP/POPS/POPRC.8/8 and UNEP/POPS/POPRC.8/9, the report on the assessment of chemical alternatives to endosulfan and DDT is set out in the annex to the present note; it has not been formally edited. * UNEP/POPS/POPRC.8/1. K1282318 040912 UNEP/POPS/POPRC.8/INF/12 Annex Report on the assessment of chemical alternatives to endosulfan and DDT Draft prepared by the ad hoc working group on assessment of alternatives to endosulfan and DDT under the POPs Review Committee of the Stockholm Convention July 2012 2 UNEP/POPS/POPRC.8/INF/12 Table of Content 1. Disclaimer 2. Background and proposed results 3. Prioritization of Chemical Alternatives for Endosulfan with respect to the Persistent Organic Pollutant (POP) Characteristics (Annex D) 3.1. Introduction 3.2. Endpoint and data selection for prioritisation 3.3. Experimental information 3.4. QSAR information 3.5. Description of the data sources 3.6. Uncertainties 3.7. Data analysis 3.8. Results 3.9. Comments on selected alternative substances 4. Methodology for the assessment of persistent organic pollutant characteristics and identification of other hazard indicators for the assessment of chemical alternatives to Endosulfan and DDT 4.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Acknowledgements
    Acknowledgements We would like to thank those involved in creating Planning a Drift Catcher Project and Organizing a Drift Campaign, including: Jeff Conant from the Hesperian Foundation; Mateo Rutherford and Roy Rojas of BITTS for translation; Brenda J. Willoughby (Pesticide Action Network North America) for layout; and contributors Andrea Wilson and Tracey Brieger (Californians for Pesticide Reform) and Katherine Mills, Susan Kegley, Tanya Brown, Kelly Campbell and Christine Riordan (Pesticide Action Network North America). Major funding for this guide and development of the Drift Catcher was provided by the Cedar Tree Foundation. Additional support was provided by grants to Pesticide Action Network North America and/or Californians for Pesticide Reform by the Beldon Fund, The California Endowment, The California Wellness Foundation, Columbia Foundation, Nathan Cummings Foundation, David B. Gold Foundation, Richard and Rhoda Goldman Foundation, Clarence E. Heller Charitable Foundation, David H. Klein, Jr. Foundation and John Merck Fund. The authors bear responsibility for any factual errors. Recommendations and views expressed are those of Pesticide Action Network North America, and do not necessarily represent the views of our funders and supporters. © 2012 by Pesticide Action Network North America. Permission is granted to reproduce portions of this report, provided the title and publishing organizations—Pesticide Action Network and Californians for Pesticide Reform—are acknowledged. Our sincerest thanks to the Hesperian Foundation for providing many of the images used in these materials. Copyright © 2003 by the Hesperian Foundation. The Hesperian Foundation encourages others to copy, reproduce, or adapt to meet local needs any or all of this pamphlet provided that what is reproduced is distributed free or at cost—not for profit.
    [Show full text]