RNA Epigenetics: Fine-Tuning Chromatin Plasticity and Transcriptional Regulation, and the Implications in Human Diseases

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

RNA Epigenetics: Fine-Tuning Chromatin Plasticity and Transcriptional Regulation, and the Implications in Human Diseases G C A T T A C G G C A T genes Review RNA Epigenetics: Fine-Tuning Chromatin Plasticity and Transcriptional Regulation, and the Implications in Human Diseases Amber Willbanks, Shaun Wood and Jason X. Cheng * Department of Pathology, Hematopathology Section, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; [email protected] (A.W.); [email protected] (S.W.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Chromatin structure plays an essential role in eukaryotic gene expression and cell identity. Traditionally, DNA and histone modifications have been the focus of chromatin regulation; however, recent molecular and imaging studies have revealed an intimate connection between RNA epigenetics and chromatin structure. Accumulating evidence suggests that RNA serves as the interplay between chromatin and the transcription and splicing machineries within the cell. Additionally, epigenetic modifications of nascent RNAs fine-tune these interactions to regulate gene expression at the co- and post-transcriptional levels in normal cell development and human diseases. This review will provide an overview of recent advances in the emerging field of RNA epigenetics, specifically the role of RNA modifications and RNA modifying proteins in chromatin remodeling, transcription activation and RNA processing, as well as translational implications in human diseases. Keywords: 5’ cap (5’ cap); 7-methylguanosine (m7G); R-loops; N6-methyladenosine (m6A); RNA editing; A-to-I; C-to-U; 2’-O-methylation (Nm); 5-methylcytosine (m5C); NOL1/NOP2/sun domain Citation: Willbanks, A.; Wood, S.; (NSUN); MYC Cheng, J.X. RNA Epigenetics: Fine-Tuning Chromatin Plasticity and Transcriptional Regulation, and the Implications in Human Diseases. Genes 2021, 12, 627. https://doi.org/ 1. Introduction 10.3390/genes12050627 In eukaryotes, genomic DNA and its associated proteins, primarily histones, are or- ganized into chromatin structural domains that affect the binding of transcription factors Academic Editor: Vincenzo Cavalieri (TFs), recruitment of RNA polymerases (RNAPs) and the initiation and elongation of transcription [1]. The advent of new genome-wide sequencing technologies has identified Received: 1 March 2021 chromatin-associated RNAs (ChrRNAs) [2], including nascent RNAs, coding RNAs and Accepted: 14 April 2021 various regulatory non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs). RNAs can act either in cis by targeting Published: 22 April 2021 genomic DNA or in trans through RNAP complexes and interactions with DNA-binding proteins, such as TFs and DNA/histone modifiers, to regulate chromatin structure and Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral gene expression. There are extensive studies and reviews of the roles of ncRNAs in the with regard to jurisdictional claims in regulation of DNA/histone modifications, chromatin structure, and gene expression [3–10]. published maps and institutional affil- In contrast, the role of RNA modifications and RNA modifying proteins (RMPs) in chro- iations. matin plasticity and transcription regulation remains largely unknown. This review will discuss recent studies, which suggest RNA modifications and RMPs function to fine-tune chromatin structure, in turn facilitating transcription activation or repression. Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. 2. Co- and Post-Transcriptional RNA Modifications and RNA Modifying Proteins Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. 2.1. Overview of RNA Modifications and RMPs This article is an open access article Over 170 chemical modifications have been identified in RNA [11]. The associated distributed under the terms and RNA modifying proteins (RMPs) are classified into three groups based on their roles in RNA conditions of the Creative Commons modification: (1) writers: enzymes that catalyze specific RNA modifications, (2) readers: Attribution (CC BY) license (https:// enzymes that recognize and selectively bind to RNA modifications and (3) erasers: enzymes creativecommons.org/licenses/by/ 4.0/). that remove specific RNA modifications. These RMPs are distributed throughout the Genes 2021, 12, 627. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes12050627 https://www.mdpi.com/journal/genes Genes 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 41 RNA modifying proteins (RMPs) are classified into three groups based on their roles in Genes 2021, 12, 627 RNA modification: (1) writers: enzymes that catalyze specific RNA modifications,2 of 41 (2) readers: enzymes that recognize and selectively bind to RNA modifications and (3) erasers: enzymes that remove specific RNA modifications. These RMPs are distributed throughout the nuclei, cytoplasm and mitochondria and are involved in nearly all essen- nuclei, cytoplasm and mitochondria and are involved in nearly all essential bioprocesses tial(Figure bioprocesses1) [11–13 (Figure]. In this 1) section, [11–13]. we In will this provide section, a we brief will update provide on the a brief common update RNA on the commonmodifications RNA andmodifications their associated and RMPstheir asassociated well as their RMPs impact as on well chromatin as their structure impact on chromatinand transcription structure regulation. and transcription The common regu RNAlation. modifications The common and theirRNA writers, modifications readers and theirand writers, erasers arereaders shown and inFigures erasers2 andare3 ;show N6-methyladenosinen in Figures 2 (mand6 A)3; andN6-methyladenosine its RMPs are 5 (msummarized6A) and its RMPs in Figure are2 A;summarized 5-methylcytosine in Figure (m C) 2A; and 5-methylcytosine its RMPs in Figure (m2B;5C) Adenosine and its RMPs in Figureto inosine 2B; (A-to-I) Adenosine RNA editingto inosine and its(A-to-I) RMPs inRNA Figure editing3A; Cytosine and its to RMPs uracil in RNA Figure editing 3A; Cy- tosineand to its uracil RMPs inRNA Figure editing3B. and its RMPs in Figure 3B. FigureFigure 1. Subcellular 1. Subcellular Distribution Distribution of ofRNA RNA Mo Modificationsdifications and RMPsRMPs in in Eukaryotes. Eukaryotes Abbreviations:. Abbreviations: RMP, RMP, RNA RNA modifying modifying 7 6 5 protein;protein; RBP, RBP, RNA RNA binding binding proteins; proteins; m mG,7G, 7-methylguanosine; 7-methylguanosine; Nm, Nm, 2 02-O-methylation;′-O-methylation; m6 A,m N6-methyladenosine;A, N6-methyladenosine; m5C, m C, 5-methylcytosine;5-methylcytosine; hnRNPs, hnRNPs, heteroge heterogeneousneous nuclear nuclear ribonucleoproteins. ribonucleoproteins. GenesGenes 2021,2021 12, ,x12 FOR, 627 PEER REVIEW 3 of 413 of 41 Figure 2. Formation, Recognition and Removal of RNA m6A and m5C in Eukaryotes. (A). Formation, Recognition and Figure 2. Formation, Recognition and Removal of RNA m6A and m5C in Eukaryotes. (A). Formation, Recognition and Removal of RNA:m6A. The METTL3/14 methyltransferase complex transfers methyl groups from SAM to N6-adenosines Removal of RNA:m6A. The METTL3/14 methyltransferase complex transfers methyl groups from SAM to N6-adenosines at the RRAH motifs in RNA. m6A is then recognized by m6A readers (m6A-selective binding proteins), and eventually at the RRAH motifs in RNA. m6A is then recognized by m6A readers (m6A-selective binding proteins), and eventually removed by RNA m6A erasers. (B). Formation, Recognition and Removal of RNA:m5C. RNA m5C writers methylate removed by RNA m6A erasers. (B). Formation, Recognition and Removal of RNA:m5C. RNA m5C writers methylate cy- cytosine residues, which are then recognized by m5C readers, or TETs, which oxidize m5C to hm5C, f5C and ca5C, tosine residues, which are then recognized by m5C readers, or TETs, which oxidize m5C to hm5C, f5C and ca5C, respec- tively.respectively. Abbreviations: Abbreviations: SAM, S-adenosyl SAM, S-adenosylmethionine;methionine; SAH, S-adenos SAH, S-adenosylyl homocysteine; homocysteine; RBM15, RBM15, RNA RNA binding binding motif motif protein 15; METTL3/14,protein 15; METTL3/14, methyltransferase methyltransferase like 3/14; like ZC3H13, 3/14; ZC3H13, zinc finger zinc finger CCCH-type CCCH-type containing containing 13; 13; WTAP, WTAP, Wilms tumortumor sup- pressorsuppressor gene WT1; gene WT1;VIRMA, VIRMA, Vir-like Vir-like m6A m6A methyltransferase methyltransferase associat associated;ed; HAKAI,HAKAI, Cbl Cbl Proto-Oncogene Proto-Oncogene Like Like 1; FTO, 1; FatFTO, Fat massmass and andobesity obesity associated; associated; ALKBH5, ALKBH5, AlkB homologhomolog 5; 5; YTHDC1/2, YTHDC1/2, YTH YTH domain domain containing containing 1/2; YTHDF2/3,1/2; YTHDF2/3, YTH N6,YTH N6, methyladenosinemethyladenosine RNA-binding RNA-binding protein protein 2/3; HNRNP family,family, heterogeneous heterogeneous nuclear nuclear ribonucleoproteins; ribonucleoproteins; IGF2BP1/2/3, IGF2BP1/2/3, insulin-likeinsulin-like growth growth factor factor 2 mRNA 2 mRNA binding binding protein protein 1/2/ 1/2/3.3. NSUN NSUN family, family, NOL1/NOP2/sun domain; DNMT2,DNMT2, DNA DNA me- thyltransferasemethyltransferase 2; ALYREF, 2; ALYREF, Aly/REF Aly/REF export export factor; factor; YTHDF2, YTHDF2, YTH YTH N6-methyladenosine N6-methyladenosine RNA bindingbinding protein protein 2; 2; TETs, TETs, ten 5 5 5 eleventen translocation eleven translocation elements; elements; hm5C, hm 5-hydroxymethylcytosine;C, 5-hydroxymethylcytosine; f5C, f C, 5-formylcytosine; 5-formylcytosine; ca 5C, 5-carboxylcytosine. Genes 2021, 12, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 41 Genes 2021, 12, 627 4 of 41 Figure 3. Molecular Reactions of RNA Adenosine to Inosine (A-to-I) and Cytidine to Uridine (C-to-U) Editing in Eukaryotes. Figure(A 3.). A-to-IMolecular RNA Reactions Editing Mechanism. of RNA ADAR1Adenosine and to ADAR2 Inosine catalyze (A-to-I) the site-specificand Cytidine
Recommended publications
  • Comparison of the Effects on Mrna and Mirna Stability Arian Aryani and Bernd Denecke*
    Aryani and Denecke BMC Research Notes (2015) 8:164 DOI 10.1186/s13104-015-1114-z RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access In vitro application of ribonucleases: comparison of the effects on mRNA and miRNA stability Arian Aryani and Bernd Denecke* Abstract Background: MicroRNA has become important in a wide range of research interests. Due to the increasing number of known microRNAs, these molecules are likely to be increasingly seen as a new class of biomarkers. This is driven by the fact that microRNAs are relatively stable when circulating in the plasma. Despite extensive analysis of mechanisms involved in microRNA processing, relatively little is known about the in vitro decay of microRNAs under defined conditions or about the relative stabilities of mRNAs and microRNAs. Methods: In this in vitro study, equal amounts of total RNA of identical RNA pools were treated with different ribonucleases under defined conditions. Degradation of total RNA was assessed using microfluidic analysis mainly based on ribosomal RNA. To evaluate the influence of the specific RNases on the different classes of RNA (ribosomal RNA, mRNA, miRNA) ribosomal RNA as well as a pattern of specific mRNAs and miRNAs was quantified using RT-qPCR assays. By comparison to the untreated control sample the ribonuclease-specific degradation grade depending on the RNA class was determined. Results: In the present in vitro study we have investigated the stabilities of mRNA and microRNA with respect to the influence of ribonucleases used in laboratory practice. Total RNA was treated with specific ribonucleases and the decay of different kinds of RNA was analysed by RT-qPCR and miniaturized gel electrophoresis.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular and Physiological Basis for Hair Loss in Near Naked Hairless and Oak Ridge Rhino-Like Mouse Models: Tracking the Role of the Hairless Gene
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 5-2006 Molecular and Physiological Basis for Hair Loss in Near Naked Hairless and Oak Ridge Rhino-like Mouse Models: Tracking the Role of the Hairless Gene Yutao Liu University of Tennessee - Knoxville Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Life Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Liu, Yutao, "Molecular and Physiological Basis for Hair Loss in Near Naked Hairless and Oak Ridge Rhino- like Mouse Models: Tracking the Role of the Hairless Gene. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2006. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/1824 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Yutao Liu entitled "Molecular and Physiological Basis for Hair Loss in Near Naked Hairless and Oak Ridge Rhino-like Mouse Models: Tracking the Role of the Hairless Gene." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in Life Sciences. Brynn H. Voy, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Naima Moustaid-Moussa, Yisong Wang, Rogert Hettich Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Structure of Long Non-Coding Rnas, J
    IMF YJMBI-63988; No. of pages: 15; 4C: 3, 4, 7, 8, 10 1 2 Rise of the RNA Machines: Exploring the Structure of 3 Long Non-Coding RNAs 4 Irina V. Novikova, Scott P. Hennelly, Chang-Shung Tung and Karissa Y. Sanbonmatsu Q15 6 Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA 7 Correspondence to Karissa Y. Sanbonmatsu: [email protected] 8 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2013.02.030 9 Edited by A. Pyle 1011 12 Abstract 13 Novel, profound and unexpected roles of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are emerging in critical aspects of 14 gene regulation. Thousands of lncRNAs have been recently discovered in a wide range of mammalian 15 systems, related to development, epigenetics, cancer, brain function and hereditary disease. The structural 16 biology of these lncRNAs presents a brave new RNA world, which may contain a diverse zoo of new 17 architectures and mechanisms. While structural studies of lncRNAs are in their infancy, we describe existing 18 structural data for lncRNAs, as well as crystallographic studies of other RNA machines and their implications 19 for lncRNAs. We also discuss the importance of dynamics in RNA machine mechanism. Determining 20 commonalities between lncRNA systems will help elucidate the evolution and mechanistic role of lncRNAs in 21 disease, creating a structural framework necessary to pursue lncRNA-based therapeutics. 22 © 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd. 24 23 25 Introduction rather than the exception in the case of eukaryotic 50 organisms. 51 26 RNA is primarily known as an intermediary in gene LncRNAs are defined by the following: (i) lack of 52 11 27 expression between DNA and proteins.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table S1. Upregulated Genes Differentially
    Supplementary Table S1. Upregulated genes differentially expressed in athletes (p < 0.05 and 1.3-fold change) Gene Symbol p Value Fold Change 221051_s_at NMRK2 0.01 2.38 236518_at CCDC183 0.00 2.05 218804_at ANO1 0.00 2.05 234675_x_at 0.01 2.02 207076_s_at ASS1 0.00 1.85 209135_at ASPH 0.02 1.81 228434_at BTNL9 0.03 1.81 229985_at BTNL9 0.01 1.79 215795_at MYH7B 0.01 1.78 217979_at TSPAN13 0.01 1.77 230992_at BTNL9 0.01 1.75 226884_at LRRN1 0.03 1.74 220039_s_at CDKAL1 0.01 1.73 236520_at 0.02 1.72 219895_at TMEM255A 0.04 1.72 201030_x_at LDHB 0.00 1.69 233824_at 0.00 1.69 232257_s_at 0.05 1.67 236359_at SCN4B 0.04 1.64 242868_at 0.00 1.63 1557286_at 0.01 1.63 202780_at OXCT1 0.01 1.63 1556542_a_at 0.04 1.63 209992_at PFKFB2 0.04 1.63 205247_at NOTCH4 0.01 1.62 1554182_at TRIM73///TRIM74 0.00 1.61 232892_at MIR1-1HG 0.02 1.61 204726_at CDH13 0.01 1.6 1561167_at 0.01 1.6 1565821_at 0.01 1.6 210169_at SEC14L5 0.01 1.6 236963_at 0.02 1.6 1552880_at SEC16B 0.02 1.6 235228_at CCDC85A 0.02 1.6 1568623_a_at SLC35E4 0.00 1.59 204844_at ENPEP 0.00 1.59 1552256_a_at SCARB1 0.02 1.59 1557283_a_at ZNF519 0.02 1.59 1557293_at LINC00969 0.03 1.59 231644_at 0.01 1.58 228115_at GAREM1 0.01 1.58 223687_s_at LY6K 0.02 1.58 231779_at IRAK2 0.03 1.58 243332_at LOC105379610 0.04 1.58 232118_at 0.01 1.57 203423_at RBP1 0.02 1.57 AMY1A///AMY1B///AMY1C///AMY2A///AMY2B// 208498_s_at 0.03 1.57 /AMYP1 237154_at LOC101930114 0.00 1.56 1559691_at 0.01 1.56 243481_at RHOJ 0.03 1.56 238834_at MYLK3 0.01 1.55 213438_at NFASC 0.02 1.55 242290_at TACC1 0.04 1.55 ANKRD20A1///ANKRD20A12P///ANKRD20A2///
    [Show full text]
  • The Roles of Histone Deacetylase 5 and the Histone Methyltransferase Adaptor WDR5 in Myc Oncogenesis
    The Roles of Histone Deacetylase 5 and the Histone Methyltransferase Adaptor WDR5 in Myc oncogenesis By Yuting Sun This thesis is submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of New South Wales Children’s Cancer Institute Australia for Medical Research School of Women’s and Children’s Health, Faculty of Medicine University of New South Wales Australia August 2014 PLEASE TYPE THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES Thesis/Dissertation Sheet Surname or Family name: Sun First name: Yuting Other name/s: Abbreviation for degree as given in the University calendar: PhD School : School of·Women's and Children's Health Faculty: Faculty of Medicine Title: The Roles of Histone Deacetylase 5 and the Histone Methyltransferase Adaptor WDR5 in Myc oncogenesis. Abstract 350 words maximum: (PLEASE TYPE) N-Myc Induces neuroblastoma by regulating the expression of target genes and proteins, and N-Myc protein is degraded by Fbxw7 and NEDD4 and stabilized by Aurora A. The class lla histone deacetylase HDAC5 suppresses gene transcription, and blocks myoblast and leukaemia cell differentiation. While histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4) trimethylation at target gene promoters is a pre-requisite for Myc· induced transcriptional activation, WDRS, as a histone H3K4 methyltransferase presenter, is required for H3K4 methylation and transcriptional activation mediated by a histone H3K4 methyltransferase complex. Here, I investigated the roles of HDAC5 and WDR5 in N-Myc overexpressing neuroblastoma. I have found that N-Myc upregulates HDAC5 protein expression, and that HDAC5 represses NEDD4 gene expression, increases Aurora A gene expression and consequently upregulates N-Myc protein expression in neuroblastoma cells.
    [Show full text]
  • SARS-Cov-2 RNA, Qualitative Real-Time RT-PCR (Test Code 39433)
    SARS-CoV-2 RNA, Qualitative Real-Time RT-PCR (Test Code 39433) Package Insert For Emergency Use Only For In-vitro Diagnostic Use - Rx Only Intended Use The Quest Diagnostics SARS-CoV-2 RNA, Qualitative Real-Time RT-PCR (“Quest SARS-CoV-2 rRT-PCR”) is a real-time RT-PCR test intended for the qualitative detection of nucleic acid from the SARS-CoV-2 in upper and lower respiratory specimens (such as nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swabs, sputum, tracheal aspirates, and bronchoalveolar lavage) collected from individuals suspected of COVID-19 by their healthcare provider. This test is also for use with nasal swab specimens that are self-collected at home or in a healthcare setting by individuals using an authorized home-collection kit when determined to be appropriate by a healthcare provider. This test is for the qualitative detection of nucleic acid from the SARS-CoV-2 in pooled samples containing up to four of the individual upper respiratory swab specimens (nasopharyngeal, mid-turbinate, anterior nares or oropharyngeal swabs) that were collected in individual vials containing transport media from individuals suspected of COVID-19 by their healthcare provider. Negative results from pooled testing should not be treated as definitive. If patient’s clinical signs and symptoms are inconsistent with a negative result or results are necessary for patient management, then the patient should be considered for individual testing. Specimens included in pools with a positive, inconclusive, or invalid result must be tested individually prior to reporting a result. Specimens with low viral loads may not be detected in sample pools due to the decreased sensitivity of pooled testing.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Protein Identities in Evs Isolated from U87-MG GBM Cells As Determined by NG LC-MS/MS
    Protein identities in EVs isolated from U87-MG GBM cells as determined by NG LC-MS/MS. No. Accession Description Σ Coverage Σ# Proteins Σ# Unique Peptides Σ# Peptides Σ# PSMs # AAs MW [kDa] calc. pI 1 A8MS94 Putative golgin subfamily A member 2-like protein 5 OS=Homo sapiens PE=5 SV=2 - [GG2L5_HUMAN] 100 1 1 7 88 110 12,03704523 5,681152344 2 P60660 Myosin light polypeptide 6 OS=Homo sapiens GN=MYL6 PE=1 SV=2 - [MYL6_HUMAN] 100 3 5 17 173 151 16,91913397 4,652832031 3 Q6ZYL4 General transcription factor IIH subunit 5 OS=Homo sapiens GN=GTF2H5 PE=1 SV=1 - [TF2H5_HUMAN] 98,59 1 1 4 13 71 8,048185945 4,652832031 4 P60709 Actin, cytoplasmic 1 OS=Homo sapiens GN=ACTB PE=1 SV=1 - [ACTB_HUMAN] 97,6 5 5 35 917 375 41,70973209 5,478027344 5 P13489 Ribonuclease inhibitor OS=Homo sapiens GN=RNH1 PE=1 SV=2 - [RINI_HUMAN] 96,75 1 12 37 173 461 49,94108966 4,817871094 6 P09382 Galectin-1 OS=Homo sapiens GN=LGALS1 PE=1 SV=2 - [LEG1_HUMAN] 96,3 1 7 14 283 135 14,70620005 5,503417969 7 P60174 Triosephosphate isomerase OS=Homo sapiens GN=TPI1 PE=1 SV=3 - [TPIS_HUMAN] 95,1 3 16 25 375 286 30,77169764 5,922363281 8 P04406 Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase OS=Homo sapiens GN=GAPDH PE=1 SV=3 - [G3P_HUMAN] 94,63 2 13 31 509 335 36,03039959 8,455566406 9 Q15185 Prostaglandin E synthase 3 OS=Homo sapiens GN=PTGES3 PE=1 SV=1 - [TEBP_HUMAN] 93,13 1 5 12 74 160 18,68541938 4,538574219 10 P09417 Dihydropteridine reductase OS=Homo sapiens GN=QDPR PE=1 SV=2 - [DHPR_HUMAN] 93,03 1 1 17 69 244 25,77302971 7,371582031 11 P01911 HLA class II histocompatibility antigen,
    [Show full text]
  • RNA Interference with Sirna
    CANCER GENOMICS & PROTEOMICS 3: 127-136 (2006) Review RNA Interference with siRNA HELENA JOYCE*, ISABELLA BRAY* and MARTIN CLYNES National Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin, Ireland Abstract. Over the last decade, RNA interference has RNAs (13). Twenty-one different gene products with emerged as an effective mechanism for silencing gene different functions and subcellular localizations were expression. This ancient cellular antiviral response can be used studied. Knockdown experiments, monitored by to allow specific inhibition of the function of any chosen target immunofluorescence and immunoblotting, showed that even gene, including those involved in diseases such as cancer, major cellular proteins such as actin and vimentin could be AIDS and hepatitis. It has become an invaluable research tool silenced efficiently. Previous work had discovered that these to aid in the identification of novel genes involved in disease 22-nucleotide sequences served as guide sequences that processes. It has advanced from the use of synthetic RNA for instruct a multicomponent nuclease, RNA-induced silencing the endogenous production of small hairpin RNA by plasmid complex (RISC), to destroy specific messenger RNAs (7). and viral vectors, and from transient inhibition in vitro to It was then found that, in response to dsRNA, cells trigger longer-lasting effects in vivo. However, as with antisense and a two-step reaction. In the first step, long dsRNA is ribozymes, the efficient delivery of siRNA into cells is currently processed by a ribonuclease (RNase) III enzyme, called the limiting factor to successful gene expression inhibition in Dicer, into small interfering RNAs (siRNAs); these vivo. This review gives an overview of the mechanism of action subsequently serve as the sequence determinants of the of siRNA and its use in cancer research.
    [Show full text]
  • Enzyme DHRS7
    Toward the identification of a function of the “orphan” enzyme DHRS7 Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung der Würde eines Doktors der Philosophie vorgelegt der Philosophisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Basel von Selene Araya, aus Lugano, Tessin Basel, 2018 Originaldokument gespeichert auf dem Dokumentenserver der Universität Basel edoc.unibas.ch Genehmigt von der Philosophisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät auf Antrag von Prof. Dr. Alex Odermatt (Fakultätsverantwortlicher) und Prof. Dr. Michael Arand (Korreferent) Basel, den 26.6.2018 ________________________ Dekan Prof. Dr. Martin Spiess I. List of Abbreviations 3α/βAdiol 3α/β-Androstanediol (5α-Androstane-3α/β,17β-diol) 3α/βHSD 3α/β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 17β-HSD 17β-Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase 17αOHProg 17α-Hydroxyprogesterone 20α/βOHProg 20α/β-Hydroxyprogesterone 17α,20α/βdiOHProg 20α/βdihydroxyprogesterone ADT Androgen deprivation therapy ANOVA Analysis of variance AR Androgen Receptor AKR Aldo-Keto Reductase ATCC American Type Culture Collection CAM Cell Adhesion Molecule CYP Cytochrome P450 CBR1 Carbonyl reductase 1 CRPC Castration resistant prostate cancer Ct-value Cycle threshold-value DHRS7 (B/C) Dehydrogenase/Reductase Short Chain Dehydrogenase Family Member 7 (B/C) DHEA Dehydroepiandrosterone DHP Dehydroprogesterone DHT 5α-Dihydrotestosterone DMEM Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium DMSO Dimethyl Sulfoxide DTT Dithiothreitol E1 Estrone E2 Estradiol ECM Extracellular Membrane EDTA Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid EMT Epithelial-mesenchymal transition ER Endoplasmic Reticulum ERα/β Estrogen Receptor α/β FBS Fetal Bovine Serum 3 FDR False discovery rate FGF Fibroblast growth factor HEPES 4-(2-Hydroxyethyl)-1-Piperazineethanesulfonic Acid HMDB Human Metabolome Database HPLC High Performance Liquid Chromatography HSD Hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase IC50 Half-Maximal Inhibitory Concentration LNCaP Lymph node carcinoma of the prostate mRNA Messenger Ribonucleic Acid n.d.
    [Show full text]
  • APOBEC1 Complementation Factor (A1CF) and RBM47 Interact in Tissue-Specific Regulation of C to U RNA Editing in Mouse Intestine and Liver
    Downloaded from rnajournal.cshlp.org on September 24, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press APOBEC1 complementation factor (A1CF) and RBM47 interact in tissue-specific regulation of C to U RNA editing in mouse intestine and liver Valerie Blanc1, Yan Xie1, Susan Kennedy1, Jesse D. Riordan2, Deborah C. Rubin1, Blair B. Madison1, Jason C. Mills1, Joseph H. Nadeau2, Nicholas O. Davidson1,3 1Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63105, 2Pacific Northwest Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98122 3To whom communication should be addressed: Email: [email protected] Running title: A1CF and RBM47 interactively regulate C to U RNA editing Keywords: APOBEC1; A1CF; RBM47; ApoB; Intestine; Liver Downloaded from rnajournal.cshlp.org on September 24, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press ABSTRACT (246 words) Mammalian C to U RNA is mediated by APOBEC1, the catalytic deaminase, together with RNA binding cofactors (including A1CF and RBM47) whose relative physiological requirements are unresolved. Although A1CF complements APOBEC1 for in-vitro RNA editing, A1cf–/– mice exhibited no change in apolipoproteinB (apoB) RNA editing, while Rbm47 mutant mice exhibited impaired intestinal RNA editing of apoB as well as other targets. Here we examined the role of A1CF and RBM47 in adult mouse liver and intestine, following deletion of either one or both gene products and also following forced (liver or intestinal) transgenic A1CF expression. There were minimal changes in hepatic and intestinal apoB RNA editing in A1cf–/– mice and no changes in either liver- or intestine-specific A1CF transgenic mice. Rbm47 liver-specific knockout (Rbm47LKO) mice demonstrated reduced editing in a subset (11 of 20) RNA targets, including apoB.
    [Show full text]
  • NIH Public Access Provided by CDC Stacks Author Manuscript Mol Genet Metab
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE NIH Public Access provided by CDC Stacks Author Manuscript Mol Genet Metab. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2013 November 01. Published in final edited form as: Mol Genet Metab. 2012 November ; 107(3): 596–604. doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2012.09.022. Associations between maternal genotypes and metabolites implicated in congenital heart defects $watermark-text $watermark-text $watermark-text Shimul Chowdhury1,2, Charlotte A. Hobbs1, Stewart L. MacLeod1, Mario A. Cleves1, Stepan Melnyk1, S. Jill James1, Ping Hu1, and Stephen W. Erickson1,3 1Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas Children’s Hospital Research Institute, 13 Children’s Way, Slot 512, Little Rock, AR 72202, USA 2Clinical Molecular Genetics Department, Providence Sacred Heart Medical Center, 101 W. Eighth Avenue, Spokane, WA 99204, USA 3Department of Biostatistics, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Arkansas Children’s Hospital Research Institute, 4301 W. Markham Street, Slot 781, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA Abstract Background—The development of non-syndromic congenital heart defects (CHDs) involves a complex interplay of genetics, metabolism, and lifestyle. Previous studies have implicated maternal single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and altered metabolism in folate-related pathways as CHD risk factors. Objective—We sought to discover associations between maternal SNPs and metabolites involved in the homocysteine, folate, and transsulfuration pathways, and determine if these associations differ between CHD cases and controls. Design—Genetic, metabolic, demographic, and lifestyle information was available for 335 mothers with CHD-affected pregnancies and 263 mothers with unaffected pregnancies.
    [Show full text]