Herbivore Larval Development at Low Springtime Temperatures: the Importance of Short Periods of Heating in the Field
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Download Animal List
MICHIGAN'S SPECIAL ANIMALS Endangered, Threatened, Special Concern, and Probably Extirpated This list presents the Endangered (E), Threatened (T), and Probably Extirpated (X) animal species of Michigan, which are protected under the Endangered Species Act of the State of Michigan (Part 365 of PA 451, 1994 Michigan Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act). The current list became effective on April 9, 2009, after extensive review by technical advisors to the Michigan Department of Natural Resources and the citizenry of the state. Also included in this list are animal species of Special Concern (SC). While not afforded legal protection under the Act, many of these species are of concern because of declining or relict populations in the state. Should these species continue to decline, they would be recommended for Threatened or Endangered status. Protection of Special Concern species now, before they reach dangerously low population levels, would prevent the need to list them in the future by maintaining adequate numbers of self-sustaining populations within Michigan. Some other potentially rare species are listed as Special Concern pending more precise information on their status in the state; when such information becomes available, they could be moved to threatened or endangered status or deleted from the list. This list was produced by the Endangered Species Program of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources and the Michigan Natural Features Inventory. English names in common usage or from published sources have been incorporated, when possible, to promote public understanding of and participation in the Endangered Species Program. To comment on the list or request additional copies, or for information on the Endangered Species Program, contact the Endangered Species Coordinator, Wildlife Division, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, P.O. -
Autographa Gamma
1 Table of Contents Table of Contents Authors, Reviewers, Draft Log 4 Introduction to the Reference 6 Soybean Background 11 Arthropods 14 Primary Pests of Soybean (Full Pest Datasheet) 14 Adoretus sinicus ............................................................................................................. 14 Autographa gamma ....................................................................................................... 26 Chrysodeixis chalcites ................................................................................................... 36 Cydia fabivora ................................................................................................................. 49 Diabrotica speciosa ........................................................................................................ 55 Helicoverpa armigera..................................................................................................... 65 Leguminivora glycinivorella .......................................................................................... 80 Mamestra brassicae....................................................................................................... 85 Spodoptera littoralis ....................................................................................................... 94 Spodoptera litura .......................................................................................................... 106 Secondary Pests of Soybean (Truncated Pest Datasheet) 118 Adoxophyes orana ...................................................................................................... -
Diabrotica Speciosa Primary Pest of Soybean Arthropods Cucurbit Beetle Beetle
Diabrotica speciosa Primary Pest of Soybean Arthropods Cucurbit beetle Beetle Diabrotica speciosa Scientific name Diabrotica speciosa Germar Synonyms: Diabrotica amabilis, Diabrotica hexaspilota, Diabrotica simoni, Diabrotica simulans, Diabrotica vigens, and Galeruca speciosa Common names Cucurbit beetle, chrysanthemum beetle, San Antonio beetle, and South American corn rootworm Type of pest Beetle Taxonomic position Class: Insecta, Order: Coleoptera, Family: Chrysomelidae Reason for Inclusion in Manual CAPS Target: AHP Prioritized Pest List - 2010 Pest Description Diabrotica speciosa was first described by Germar in 1824, as Galeruca speciosa. Two subspecies have been described, D. speciosa vigens (Bolivia, Peru and Ecuador), and D. speciosa amabilis (Bolivia, Colombia, Venezuela and Panama). These two subspecies differ mainly in the coloring of the head and elytra (Araujo Marques, 1941; Bechyne and Bechyne, 1962). Eggs: Eggs are ovoid, about 0.74 x 0.36 mm, clear white to pale yellow. They exhibit fine reticulation that under the microscope appears like a pattern of polygonal ridges that enclose a variable number of pits (12 to 30) (Krysan, 1986). Eggs are laid in the soil near the base of a host plant in clusters, lightly agglutinated by a colorless secretion. The mandibles and anal plate of the developing larvae can be seen in mature eggs. Larvae: Defago (1991) published a detailed description of the third instar of D. speciosa. First instars are about 1.2 mm long, and mature third instars are about 8.5 mm long. They are subcylindrical; chalky white; head capsule dirty yellow to light brown, epicraneal and frontal sutures lighter, with long light-brown setae; mandibles reddish dark brown; antennae and palpi pale yellow. -
Barcoding Chrysomelidae: a Resource for Taxonomy and Biodiversity Conservation in the Mediterranean Region
A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 597:Barcoding 27–38 (2016) Chrysomelidae: a resource for taxonomy and biodiversity conservation... 27 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.597.7241 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Barcoding Chrysomelidae: a resource for taxonomy and biodiversity conservation in the Mediterranean Region Giulia Magoga1,*, Davide Sassi2, Mauro Daccordi3, Carlo Leonardi4, Mostafa Mirzaei5, Renato Regalin6, Giuseppe Lozzia7, Matteo Montagna7,* 1 Via Ronche di Sopra 21, 31046 Oderzo, Italy 2 Centro di Entomologia Alpina–Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy 3 Museo Civico di Storia Naturale di Verona, lungadige Porta Vittoria 9, 37129 Verona, Italy 4 Museo di Storia Naturale di Milano, Corso Venezia 55, 20121 Milano, Italy 5 Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources–University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran 6 Dipartimento di Scienze per gli Alimenti, la Nutrizione e l’Ambiente–Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy 7 Dipartimento di Scienze Agrarie e Ambientali–Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Celoria 2, 20133 Milano, Italy Corresponding authors: Matteo Montagna ([email protected]) Academic editor: J. Santiago-Blay | Received 20 November 2015 | Accepted 30 January 2016 | Published 9 June 2016 http://zoobank.org/4D7CCA18-26C4-47B0-9239-42C5F75E5F42 Citation: Magoga G, Sassi D, Daccordi M, Leonardi C, Mirzaei M, Regalin R, Lozzia G, Montagna M (2016) Barcoding Chrysomelidae: a resource for taxonomy and biodiversity conservation in the Mediterranean Region. In: Jolivet P, Santiago-Blay J, Schmitt M (Eds) Research on Chrysomelidae 6. ZooKeys 597: 27–38. doi: 10.3897/ zookeys.597.7241 Abstract The Mediterranean Region is one of the world’s biodiversity hot-spots, which is also characterized by high level of endemism. -
Dorset Moth Group
Melwood Moths Database last trap recording 2004 Shortcut Code Taxon Vernacular First Record Recorder Latest Record Recorder Method Comment Hep sylv 15 Hepialus sylvina Orange Swift 20/08/1989 JR Cilix glauc 1651 Cilix glaucata Chinese Character 07/07/1989 JR Habros pyrit 1653 Habrosyne pyritoides Buff Arches 06/07/1987 JR 31/07/1998 JR 80w sheet Teth oc 1654 Tethea ocularis Figure of Eighty 06/07/1987 JR Als aesc 1663 Alsophila aescularia March Moth 01/04/2004 JR 01/04/2004 JR 6w actinic trap 1673 1673 Hemistola chrysoprasaria Small Emerald <2000 JR beat for larvae Larvae on Clematis 1682 1682 Timandra comae Blood-vein 06/07/1987 JR id bis 1702 Idaea biselata Small Fan-footed Wave 06/07/1987 JR Id avers 1713 Idaea aversata Riband Wave 06/07/1987 JR 31/07/1998 JR 80w Sheet Xanth ferrug 1725 Xanthorhoe ferrugata Dark-barred Twin-spot Carpet 20/08/1989 JR Xanth fluct 1728 Xanthorhoe fluctuata Garden Carpet 20/08/1989 JR Lamp suffum 1750 Lampropteryx suffumata Water Carpet 01/04/2004 JR 01/04/2004 JR 6w actinic trap 1738 1738 Epirrhoe alternata Common Carpet 07/05/1988 JR Eul pyral 1758 Eulithis pyraliata Barred Straw 06/07/1987 JR Chloro trunc 1764 Chloroclysta truncata Common Marbled Carpet 19/10/2004 JR 80w sheet Cid fulv 1765 Cidaria fulvata Barred Yellow 06/07/1987 JR Colo pect 1776 Colostygia pectinataria Green Carpet 31/07/1998 JR 15/05/2004 JR 6w actinic trap Horis vitalb 1781 Horisme vitalbata Small Waved Umber 18/06/2000 JR Hydrio furc 1777 Hydriomena furcata July Highflyer 06/07/1987 JR 31/07/1998 JR 80w sheet Epirrit dil 1795 -
Zoogeography of the Holarctic Species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): Importance of the Bering Ian Refuge
© Entomologica Fennica. 8.XI.l991 Zoogeography of the Holarctic species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): importance of the Bering ian refuge Kauri Mikkola, J, D. Lafontaine & V. S. Kononenko Mikkola, K., Lafontaine, J.D. & Kononenko, V. S. 1991 : Zoogeography of the Holarctic species of the Noctuidae (Lepidoptera): importance of the Beringian refuge. - En to mol. Fennica 2: 157- 173. As a result of published and unpublished revisionary work, literature compi lation and expeditions to the Beringian area, 98 species of the Noctuidae are listed as Holarctic and grouped according to their taxonomic and distributional history. Of the 44 species considered to be "naturall y" Holarctic before this study, 27 (61 %) are confirmed as Holarctic; 16 species are added on account of range extensions and 29 because of changes in their taxonomic status; 17 taxa are deleted from the Holarctic list. This brings the total of the group to 72 species. Thirteen species are considered to be introduced by man from Europe, a further eight to have been transported by man in the subtropical areas, and five migrant species, three of them of Neotropical origin, may have been assisted by man. The m~jority of the "naturally" Holarctic species are associated with tundra habitats. The species of dry tundra are frequently endemic to Beringia. In the taiga zone, most Holarctic connections consist of Palaearctic/ Nearctic species pairs. The proportion ofHolarctic species decreases from 100 % in the High Arctic to between 40 and 75 % in Beringia and the northern taiga zone, and from between 10 and 20 % in Newfoundland and Finland to between 2 and 4 % in southern Ontario, Central Europe, Spain and Primorye. -
Harper's Island Wetlands Butterflies & Moths (2020)
Introduction Harper’s Island Wetlands (HIW) nature reserve, situated close to the village of Glounthaune on the north shore of Cork Harbour is well known for its birds, many of which come from all over northern Europe and beyond, but there is a lot more to the wildlife at the HWI nature reserve than birds. One of our goals it to find out as much as we can about all aspects of life, both plant and animal, that live or visit HIW. This is a report on the butterflies and moths of HIW. Butterflies After birds, butterflies are probably the one of the best known flying creatures. While there has been no structured study of them on at HIW, 17 of Ireland’s 33 resident and regular migrant species of Irish butterflies have been recorded. Just this summer we added the Comma butterfly to the island list. A species spreading across Ireland in recent years possibly in response to climate change. Hopefully we can set up regular monitoring of the butterflies at HIW in the next couple of years. Butterfly Species Recorded at Harper’s Island Wetlands up to September 2020. Colias croceus Clouded Yellow Pieris brassicae Large White Pieris rapae Small White Pieris napi Green-veined White Anthocharis cardamines Orange-tip Lycaena phlaeas Small Copper Polyommatus icarus Common Blue Celastrina argiolus Holly Blue Vanessa atalanta Red Admiral Vanessa cardui Painted Lady Aglais io Peacock Aglais urticae Small Tortoiseshell Polygonia c-album Comma Speyeria aglaja Dark-green Fritillary Pararge aegeria Speckled Wood Maniola jurtina Meadow Brown Aphantopus hyperantus Ringlet Moths One group of insects that are rarely seen by visitors to HIW is the moths. -
Winter Cutworm: a New Pest Threat in Oregon J
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION SERVICE Winter Cutworm: A New Pest Threat in Oregon J. Green, A. Dreves, B. McDonald, and E. Peachey Introduction Winter cutworm is the common name for the larval stage of the large yellow underwing moth (Noctua pronuba [Lepidoptera: Noctuidae]). The cutworm has tolerance for cold temperatures, and larval feeding activity persists throughout fall and winter. Adult N. pronuba moths have been detected in Oregon for at least a decade, and the species is common in many different ecological habitats. Epidemic outbreaks of adult moths have occurred periodically in this region, resulting in captures of up to 500 moths per night. However, larval feeding by N. pronuba has not been a problem in Oregon until recently. In 2013 and 2014, there were isolated instances reported, including damage by larvae to sod near Portland and defoliation of herb and flower gardens in Corvallis. In 2015, large numbers of larvae were observed around homes, within golf courses, and in field crops located in Oregon and Washington. Winter cutworms have a wide host range across agricultural, urban, and natural landscapes (Table Photo: Nate McGhee, © Oregon State University. 1, page 2) and are a concern as a potential crop pest that can cause considerable damage in a short highlights general information about winter amount of time. Above-ground damage occurs when cutworm, including identification, scouting recom- larvae chew through tissues near ground level, cut- mendations, and potential control measures. ting the stems off plants. Leaf chewing and root feeding also have been observed. Winter cutworms Jessica Green, faculty research assistant, Department of are gregarious, which means they feed and move in Horticulture; Amy J. -
Proceedings of the United States National Museum
: BEETLE LARVAE OF THE SUBFAMILY GALERUCINAE B}^ Adam G. Boving Senior Entoniolotjist, Bureau of Etitomology, United States Department of Agricvltwe INTRODUCTION The present pajxn- is the result of a continued investigation of the Chrysomelid hirvae in the United States National Museum, Wash- ington, D. C. Of the subfamily Galerucinae ^ belonging to this family the larvae are preserved in the Museum of the following species Monocesta coryli Say. Trirhabda canadensis Kirby. TrU'habda hrevicollis LeConte. Trirhabda nitidicollis LeConte. Trirhabda tomentosa Linnaeus. Trirhabda attenuata Say. Oalerucella nymphaeae Liiniaeus. Oalerucella lineola Fabrleius (from Euroiie). Galerucclla sagittarUu' Gylleuhal. Oalerucella luteola Miiller. Galerucclla sp. (from Nanking, China). Galcrucella vibvrni Paykull (from Europe). Oalerucella decora Say. Oalerucella notata Fabricius. Oalerucella cribrata LeConte. Monoxia puncticolUs Say. Monoxia consputa LeConte. Lochmaca capreae Linnaeus (from Europe). Qaleruca tanacett Linnaeus (from Europe). Oaleruca laticollis Sahlberg (from Europe). Oalcruca, pomonae Scopoli. Sermylassa halensls Linnaeus. Agelastica alnl Linnaeus.^ 1 The generic and specific names of tlie North American larvae are as listed in C W. Leng's " Catalogue of Coleoptera of America north of Mexico, 1920," with corrections and additions as given in the "supplement" to the catalogue published by C. W. Leng and A. J. Mutchler, 1927. The European species, not introduced into North America, are named according to the " Catalogus Coleopterorum Europae, second edition, 1906," by L. V. Heyden, E. Rcitter, and .7. Weise. 2 It will be noticed that in the enumeration above no species of Dinhrlica and Pliyllo- brotica are mentioned. The larvae of those genera were considered by tlie present author as Halticinae larvae [Boving, Adam G. -
Case Study from the Zsolca Mounds (Ne Hungary)
18/2 • 2019, 189–200 DOI: 10.2478/hacq-2019-0009 Iron age burial mounds as refugia for steppe specialist plants and invertebrates – case study from the Zsolca mounds (ne hungary) Csaba Albert Tóth1, Balázs Deák2, István nyilas3, László Bertalan1, , Orsolya Valkó4 * , Tibor József novák5 Key words: kurgan, prehistoric Abstract mound, loess steppe, biodiversity, Prehistoric mounds of the Great Hungarian Plain often function as refuges for relic cropland matrix, microhabitat, loess steppe vegetation and their associated fauna. The Zsolca mounds are a typical slope, ground-dwelling invertebrates. example of kurgans acting as refuges, and even though they are surrounded by agri- cultural land, they harbour a species rich loess grassland with an area of 0.8 ha. With Ključne besede: kurgan, a detailed field survey of their geomorphology, soil, flora and fauna, we describe the predzgodovinske gomile, stepa na most relevant attributes of the mounds regarding their maintenance as valuable grass- lesu, biotska pestrost, kmetisjki land habitats. We recorded 104 vascular plant species, including seven species that matriks, mikrohabitat, pobočje, talni are protected in Hungary and two species (Echium russicum and Pulsatilla grandis) nevretenčarji. listed in the IUCN Red List and the Habitats Directive. The negative effect of the surrounding cropland was detectable in a three-metre wide zone next to the mound edge, where the naturalness of the vegetation was lower, and the frequency of weeds, ruderal species and crop plants was higher than in the central zone. The ancient man-made mounds harboured dry and warm habitats on the southern slope, while the northern slopes had higher biodiversity, due to the balanced water supplies. -
Insect Egg Size and Shape Evolve with Ecology but Not Developmental Rate Samuel H
ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1302-4 Insect egg size and shape evolve with ecology but not developmental rate Samuel H. Church1,4*, Seth Donoughe1,3,4, Bruno A. S. de Medeiros1 & Cassandra G. Extavour1,2* Over the course of evolution, organism size has diversified markedly. Changes in size are thought to have occurred because of developmental, morphological and/or ecological pressures. To perform phylogenetic tests of the potential effects of these pressures, here we generated a dataset of more than ten thousand descriptions of insect eggs, and combined these with genetic and life-history datasets. We show that, across eight orders of magnitude of variation in egg volume, the relationship between size and shape itself evolves, such that previously predicted global patterns of scaling do not adequately explain the diversity in egg shapes. We show that egg size is not correlated with developmental rate and that, for many insects, egg size is not correlated with adult body size. Instead, we find that the evolution of parasitoidism and aquatic oviposition help to explain the diversification in the size and shape of insect eggs. Our study suggests that where eggs are laid, rather than universal allometric constants, underlies the evolution of insect egg size and shape. Size is a fundamental factor in many biological processes. The size of an 526 families and every currently described extant hexapod order24 organism may affect interactions both with other organisms and with (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1). We combined this dataset with the environment1,2, it scales with features of morphology and physi- backbone hexapod phylogenies25,26 that we enriched to include taxa ology3, and larger animals often have higher fitness4. -
Effect of Vegetation Density, Height, and Connectivity on the Oviposition Pattern of the Leaf Beetle Galeruca Tanaceti
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Online-Publikations-Server der Universität Würzburg Postprint version. Original publication in: Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 132: 134–146, 2009 Effect of vegetation density, height, and connectivity on the oviposition pattern of the leaf beetle Galeruca tanaceti Barbara Randlkofer1, Florian Jordan1, Oliver Mitesser2, Torsten Meiners1 & 3,* Elisabeth Obermaier 1Department of Applied Zoology ⁄ Animal Ecology, Freie Universität Berlin, Haderslebener Str. 9, D-12163 Berlin, Germany, 2Field Station of the University ofWürzburg, Glashüttenstr. 5, D-96181 Rauhenebrach, Germany, and 3Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biozentrum, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany *Correspondence: Elisabeth Obermaier, Department of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, University of Würzburg, Biozentrum, Am Hubland, D-97074 Würzburg, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Vegetation structure can profoundly influence patterns of abundance, distribution, and reproduction of herbivorous insects and their susceptibility to natural enemies. The three main structural traits of herbaceous vegetation are density, height, and connectivity. This study determined the herbivore response to each of these three parameters by analysing oviposition patterns in the field and studying the underlying mechanisms in laboratory bioassays. The generalist leaf beetle, Galeruca tanaceti L. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae),