South Central Gaming Zone of Kansas

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

South Central Gaming Zone of Kansas South Central Gaming Zone of Kansas Projections of Casino Visits and Gaming Revenues Prepared For: Kansas Lottery Gaming Facility Review Board November 2010 Prepared by: Wells Gaming Research 6900 South McCarran Blvd. Suite 3030 - Reno, NV 89509 775-826-3232 - http://www.wellsgaming.com South Central Gaming Zone of Kansas 2010 Projections of Gaming Revenues and Casino Visits Table of Contents Section 1 Page Introduction Background 1-1 Project Objectives, Scope of Work 1-3, 1-4 Gravity Model 1-5 Research Methodology 1-7 Limiting Conditions 1-10 Section 2 Executive Summary 2-1 Highlights of WGR's Research & Analyses 2-1 Trade Area Description 2-1 Trade Area Map (MAP 1) 2-2 Demographic Highlights 2-3 Summary of Current Gaming Capacity 2-5 Summary Comparison of the Applicants' Proposals 2-7 Highlights of the Gaming Revenue Projections 2-9 Section 3 Demographics for 2000 through 2017 Total Population 3-1 Adult Population 3-3 Median Household Income 3-4 Existing Gaming Capacity for the South Central Gaming Zone's Trade Area 3-6 Section 4 The WinSpirit - a Global Gaming KS, LLC Proposal Highlights of Global's WinSpirit 4-1 Development Site (MAP 2) 4-2 Gaming Capacity & Amenities 4-3 Existing & Proposed Competition 4-5 Scenarios - Brief Description of Each of the 7 Scenarios 4-6 Gaming Revenue Projections 4-8 Casino Visit Projections 4-10 Section 5 The Kansas Star - a Peninsula Gaming Partners, LLC Proposal Highlights of Peninsula's Kansas Star 5-1 Development Site (MAP 3) 5-2 Gaming Capacity & Amenities 5-3 Existing & Proposed Competition 5-6 Scenarios - Brief Description of Each of the 6 Scenarios 5-7 Gaming Revenue Projections 5-9 Casino Visit Projections 5-11 Section 6 Information on Wells Gaming Research & Richard H. Wells 6-1 Wells Gaming Research November 2010 6-1 Section 1 Introduction South Central Gaming Zone of Kansas 2010 Projections of Gaming Revenues and Casino Visits Introduction Background The State of Kansas legalized casino gaming in April 2007 when it passed and signed into law Senate Bill 66, the Kansas Expanded Lottery Act. Key gaming provisions of Senate Bill 66 are as follows: • Established four gaming zones • Stipulated that one state owned lottery gaming facility would be allowed in each of the four gaming zones. • Permitted an aggregate of 2,800 slot machines to be installed at 3 existing racetracks. • Created the Lottery Gaming Facility Review Board to evaluate applicants for gaming facility managers. • Required applicants to pay minimum capital investment and privilege fees. • Outlined tax structure for the contract managers of Kansas’ Lottery gaming facilities. In 2008, Round 1 of the bidding process, Kansas Lottery received four bids in the $300 to $500 million range to build and manage a gaming facility in the South Central gaming zone. Harrah’s Entertainment was ultimately selected, but then withdrew in November 2008 citing the economic downturn. In 2009, Round 2, Kansas Lottery received three considerably lower bids. The bidding pool was reduced to one after gaming companies either dropped out or combined forces. In April 2010, Chisholm Creek, the last remaining bidder, dropped out due to potential competition from a tribal casino in Park City, Kansas and uncertainty regarding potential changes in state legislation that might give Wichita Greyhound Park another chance to install slot machines. Round 3: Current Status Application Process: Shortly after Chisholm Creek withdrew its plans for a casino located at the Mulvane exit in Sumner County, the Kansas Lottery opened up the application process for a third time. Three proposals were presented to the Sumner County Board of County Commissioners on August 10, 2010. On September 8, 2010, the day that the Kansas Lottery Commission met to hear presentations from the applicants, Harrah’s Sumner Investment Company pulled its plans for a casino project. The Kansas Lottery Commission voted to approve contracts with Global Gaming Partners of Ada, Oklahoma and Peninsula Gaming Partners of Dubuque, Iowa for proposed casino projects to be located in Sumner County. Contracts were forwarded to the seven-member Lottery Review Board for their consideration and to select a winner. The review board has 60 days to review submitted casino plans, hear presentations from the applicants, consider public comments, and seek November 2010 Wells Gaming Research Page 1-1 South Central Gaming Zone of Kansas 2010 Projections of Gaming Revenues and Casino Visits guidance from their selected consulting group. After this process is complete, the review board is expected to select a winner. Gaming in Kansas: There have been several significant events that have occurred since Round 2 of the application process: • The Kansas Lottery opened their first casino in Dodge City on Tuesday, December 15, 2009. • The Kansas Lottery broke ground on its second casino in Kansas City on April 30, 2010. • To date, there have been no viable applicants in the southeast gaming zone of Kansas. • In May 2010, the Senate rejected a bill that would have reduced the mandatory investment from $250 million to $100 million and the required privilege fee from $25 million to $11 million for the southeast zone. • Slot machines in three racetracks have not materialized due to the high tax rate and a negative referendum vote in one county. • In May 2010, the Senate rejected a bill that would have allowed for racetracks to keep up to 58% (currently 25%) with expenses included, and the state could collect a minimum of 22%, plus 3% would go to the local government and 2% to gambling treatment programs. • In September 2010, the Wyandotte Nation purchased a commercial lot adjoining Wild West World along I-35 in Park City, Kansas. This is the first portion of 6 acres that the tribe has earmarked to purchase for its casino project. The Wyandotte Nation had already purchased 10.5 acres near the theme park in 1992. Their hope is to break ground on a Class II casino by the end of 2010, provided approval is received from the Department of the Interior on their application to use the land for casino gaming. Differences in Economic and Competitive Climate Round 3 vs. Round 2 Although the recession is technically over, the economy continues to be beset with unknown risk. Slow, anemic growth is expected to continue and some economists are predicting a possible double-dip recession. The consumer segment is under great pressure. Excessive borrowing and debt, exacerbated by high unemployment, continue to be a heavy constraint on consumer spending. Borrowing money continues to be very difficult for most consumers and businesses. Availability of capital continues to be restricted for casino projects. The ground rules have completely changed: developers are required to have a much higher percentage of equity capital and they cannot finance nearly as much as they could prior to the current recession. Green-field financing is all but non-existent. Expansions and new casino projects in Oklahoma have successfully continued throughout the current recession. Due to the nature of the market, lower capital November 2010 Wells Gaming Research Page 1-2 South Central Gaming Zone of Kansas 2010 Projections of Gaming Revenues and Casino Visits costs are required for gaming facility projects in Oklahoma, which has contributed to the ability of tribes to complete expansion and new casino projects. Following are significant casino projects that have been completed/or are in process in Oklahoma: • The Cherokee Nation opened the Hard Rock Hotel and Casino in August 2009. This was a major, $155 million expansion in Tulsa, Oklahoma. • The Creek Nation opened the River Spirit Casino in May 2009, a state-of- the-art, $195 million expansion in Tulsa, Oklahoma. They added an events center and parking garage in 2010. • The Cherokee Casino in West Siloam Springs underwent a $108 million expansion in 2009 and also added a hotel in June 2010. • The Cherokee Nation opened Cherokee Casino Ramona in July 2010. • The Choctaw Nation opened the Choctaw Casino Resort in February 2010 in Durant, Oklahoma for $300 million. • The Chickasaw Nation opened the WinStar World Casino on New Years’ Eve 2008. At the time it opened, it was in the top five largest casinos in the world and the largest casino in Oklahoma. The WinStar added a hotel in August 2009 and a restaurant in February 2010. • The Riverwind Casino opened a 100-room hotel in February 2009. • Lucky Star Concho has added 600 slots. • The Chickasaw Nation/Global Gaming Solutions (GGS) bought Remington Park (racetrack and casino) in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma from bankrupt Magna Entertainment Corporation for $80.25 million on December 31, 2009. In 2010, GGS spent an additional $7 million on updated slot machines and other improvements to refurbish Remington Park. In summary, gaming expansion has decelerated, but not ceased in Oklahoma during the current economic downturn. Oklahoma is second only to Nevada in the number of casinos statewide. Currently, there are approximately 61,875 slot machines at 108 casinos in Oklahoma; however, there are signs that the Oklahoma market is becoming saturated. Despite all of this, there are still planned gaming projects in Oklahoma at the present time. Project Objectives The Kansas Lottery Gaming Facility Review Board (Board) engaged WGR to conduct an independent study of each applicant in the South Central Gaming Zone of Kansas. WGR’s first objective is to provide the Board with gross gaming revenue and casino visit projections for each applicant so that they can assess which applicant would have the greatest ability to generate revenue for the State of Kansas. The second objective is to compare the revenue and casino visit projections submitted from the applicants for their projects to WGR’s independent projections.
Recommended publications
  • Kansas Star.Pdf
    Table of Contents Vision …………………………………………………………………………………….. 3 Key Parties & Gaming Management Experience..…………………….………………….. 4 Management Profiles …………………………………………………………………….. 7 Proposed Project ……………………………..………………………………………………….. 9 Infrastructure Improvements …………………………………………………………………… 18 Site Utilities ……………………………………………………………………………… 19 Emergency Services Facility ……………………………………………………………... 20 Project Budget …………………………………………………………..……………………….. 21 Project Financing ………………………………………………………………………… 22 Benefit to Sumner County ……………………………………………..…………….…… 23 Kansas All-Star Scholars Fund “Ad Astra” ………………………………………………….. 24 Summary ...……………………………………………………………………………….. 25 2 Vision Kansas Star Casino, Hotel, and Event Center will be a regional destination attraction, offering first-class gaming and non-gaming amenities, with experiences tailored specifically for the people of Sumner County, South Central Kansas, and the entire state. It has been designed with the customer in mind, to meet and even beat their expectations of Kansas fun, excitement, friendliness and value. The vision for the resort is to offer world-class gaming entertainment, fine dining, and Las Vegas-style entertainment combined with Midwestern friendliness and warmth. Along with gaming amenities that include 1,850 state-of-the-art gaming machines, 42 table games, and a 5 table poker room, our project will include a 115-seat steakhouse and cocktail bar; a 250-seat live action buffet, a 40-seat food court, a sports bar, and a casino bar offering live music and Las Vegas-style entertainment.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Casino Player Count Service™
    Wells Gaming Research Service you can count on! Information Package Professional Services Online CPCS™ Description Richard H. Wells, Background & Qualifications Client List (Current & Previous Clients) March 2005 495 Apple Street, Suite 205 Reno, Nevada 89502 Phone: (775) 826-3232 Fax: (775) 827-0986 E-Mail: [email protected] Web Page: http://www.wellsgaming.com/ Professional Services Offered Wells Gaming Research (hereinafter referred to as WGR) is a highly respected provider of a wide-range of research and advisory services for the casino gaming industry. Included are: Casino Player Count Service™ WGR's Casino Player Count Service™ has become the standard for measuring relative player count performance within the casino gaming industry. Our player count service is widely used by casinos, as well as by a select group of investment bankers. WGR’s weekly online player count reports are accompanied by a host of powerful, user friendly analytical tools that make it quick and easy for a client casino to monitor the competition. Client casinos can simply logon to WGR’s website and evaluate their competitors using the following performance criteria: • Casino rankings based on player count volume • Number of table game and/or slot machine players • Percent distribution of players • Gaming capacity inventory for both table games and slot machines • Percent distribution of market capacity • Percent of capacity utilized • User defined market fair share percentages Fair Share Goal Setting Targets for User Defined Markets One of the newest and most exciting features of WGR’s Casino Player Count Service™ is fair share goal setting for user defined markets. WGR’s online player count service automatically calculates the number of players required for a casino to reach a series of fair market share targets (for example, 100%, 105%, and 110%).
    [Show full text]
  • Five Flags Civic Center
    DRAFT COPY SUMMARY OF PHASE 2A PLANNING FOR AN EXPANDED / IMPROVED FIVE FLAGS CIVIC CENTER November 5, 2019 Conventions, Sports & Leisure International 520 Nicollet Mall • Suite 520 • Minneapolis, MN 55402 • Telephone 612.294.2000 • Facsimile 612.294.2045 November 5, 2018 Ms. Marie L. Ware Leisure Services Manager City of Dubuque Leisure Services Department 2200 Bunker Hill Road Dubuque, Iowa 52001 Dear Ms. Ware: Conventions, Sports & Leisure International (CSL) and BetschAssociates have completed work related to a Phase 2A Planning effort concerning an expanded/improved Five Flags Civic Center (FFCC). The information concerning within this document and related supporting documents presents a summary of our work and is intended to assist the City and other related project stakeholders with the information necessary to make informed decisions regarding next planning steps concerning a potential major FFCC renovation/improvement project. The work and information presented in this report and its various appendices/supporting documents are based on estimates, assumptions and other information developed from industry research, data provided by the City and other local project stakeholders, outreach with existing and potential facility users, discussions with industry participants, and analysis of competitive/comparable facilities and communities. The sources of information, the methods employed, and the basis of significant estimates and assumptions are stated in this report. Some assumptions inevitably will not materialize and unanticipated events and circumstances may occur. Therefore, actual results achieved will vary from those described and the variations may be material. The findings presented herein are based on analysis of present and near-term conditions in the Dubuque area as well as existing interest levels by the potential base of users for an enhanced FFCC product.
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Arkansas Racing Commission in the Matter Of
    BEFORE THE ARKANSAS RACING COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF THE POPE COUNTY CASINO LICENSE NOTICE OF APPEAL AND REQUEST FOR HEARING TO THE ARKANSAS RACING COMMISSION Now comes Legends Resort and Casino, LLC (“Legends”), by and through undersigned counsel, pursuant to Casino Gaming Rules 2.13.12(c) and 2.13.18(a)(i) and Ark. Code Ann. § 23-110-205, and for its appeal of the Arkansas Racing Commission’s denial of a casino license and request for a hearing, states and alleges as follows: INTRODUCTION 1. Legends brings this appeal to request the Arkansas Racing Commission (“ARC”) reverse its decision denying Legends a license to operate a casino in Pope County, Arkansas. The ARC’s denial is arbitrary, capricious, and ultra vires. The ARC has erroneously relied upon biased scoring, failed to follow its own rules, accepted an application that does not meet the minimum requirements of Amendment 100 of the Arkansas Constitution, and is presumably going to award a license to an entity that made serious misrepresentations to the ARC. 2. Legends is an Arkansas limited liability company that is wholly owned by Cherokee Nation Businesses, LLC (“CNB”). Legends is the corporation through which CNB has applied for the casino license in Pope County, and it is the only applicant that meets the minimum qualifications set forth in Amendment 100 of the Arkansas Constitution. 1 3. The ARC is an agency of the state government of Arkansas charged by Amendment 100 with the oversight and regulation of casino gaming within the State of Arkansas and authorized to issue casino gaming licenses to qualified applicants.
    [Show full text]
  • Task 4 – Project Specific Gaming Revenue Projections
    Task 4 – Project Specific Gaming Revenue Projections South Central Gaming Zone – Sumner County, Kansas Final Report Prepared For: Kansas Lottery Gaming Facility Review Board July 15, 2008 Prepared By: Wells Gaming Research 495 Apple Street, Suite 205 Reno, NV 89502 775-826-3232 http://www.wellsgaming.com Task-4 Project Specific Gaming Revenue Projections South Central Gaming Zone of Kansas Table of Contents Section 1 Page # Introduction 1-1 Research Methodology & Scope of Work 1-3 Map - South Central Zone 1-5 Gravity Model Analyses 1-6 Limiting Conditions 1-7 Section 2 Trade Area Summary 2-1 Map - South Central Zone 2-2 Current Gaming Capacity 2-3 Gravity Model Projections 2-5 Sumner Resort Harrah's Kansas 2-6 Map - South Central Zone, Harrahs Kansas Resort 2-8 Gaming Capacity Recap 2-9 WGR's Gravity Model Forecasts Compared w/ Harrah's Pro Forma Projections 2-10 Financial Statement Analyses 2-13 Balance Sheet 2-14 Income Statement 2-17 Penn National's Casino Resort in Wellington, Kansas 2-24 Map - South Central Zone, Penn National Sumner 2-26 Gaming Capacity Recap 2-27 Gravity Model Forecasts Compared w/ Penn National's Pro Forma Projections 2-28 Balance Sheet Analysis 2-31 Income Statement 2-34 Marvel Gaming, LLC 2-41 Map - South Central Zone, Marvel Gaming 2-43 Gaming Capacity Recap 2-44 Comparison of the Gravity Model Forecasts with Marvel's Pro Forma Projections 2-45 Balance Sheet 2-48 Income Statement 2-51 Section 3 Wells Gaming Research Company Information 3-1 Wells Gaming Research July 2008 Task-4 Project Specific Gaming Revenue Projections South Central Gaming Zone of Kansas Introduction The State of Kansas has lost gaming revenues for many years to a number of surrounding states, particularly to Missouri and Oklahoma.
    [Show full text]
  • Pope County Casino Resort Development
    Presentation by Gulfside Casino Partnership Confidential - Property of Gulfside Casino Partnership 1 Phase 1 ($148 million): 300-room hotel, including 40 suites 60,000 sq. ft. gaming space (1,500 slot machines; 50 table games) 300-seat buffet Fine dining steakhouse Show bar and casino Bar Casino lounge/club 24 hour cafe Coffee and pastry shop Retail Pool bar and deck Surface parking lot Confidential - Property of Gulfside Casino Partnership 2 Confidential - Property of Gulfside Casino Partnership 3 Confidential - Property of Gulfside Casino Partnership 4 Confidential - Property of Gulfside Casino Partnership 5 6 Confidential - Property of Gulfside Casino Partnership Confidential - Property of Gulfside Casino Partnership 7 Confidential - Property of Gulfside Casino Partnership 8 Confidential - Property of Gulfside Casino Partnership 9 10 Confidential - Property of Gulfside Casino Partnership Confidential - Property of Gulfside Casino Partnership 11 Confidential - Property of Gulfside Casino Partnership 12 Confidential - Property of Gulfside Casino Partnership 13 Confidential - Property of Gulfside Casino Partnership 14 Confidential - Property of Gulfside Casino Partnership 15 Confidential - Property of Gulfside Casino Partnership 16 Confidential - Property of Gulfside Casino Partnership 17 Confidential - Property of Gulfside Casino Partnership 18 Confidential - Property of Gulfside Casino Partnership 19 Phase 2 ($52 million): 150 additional hotel rooms (total 450 rooms) 15,000 sq. ft. gaming space (total 1,800 slots; 75 table
    [Show full text]
  • How Plan Implementation Fails: Examining the Role of Experience, Expectations, and Externalities
    How Plan Implementation Fails: Examining the role of Experience, Expectations, and Externalities DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Zachary E. Kenitzer Graduate Program in City and Regional Planning The Ohio State University 2016 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Jennifer Evans-Cowley AICP, Advisor Dr. Rachel G. Kleit Dr. Bernadette Hanlon Copyrighted by Zachary E. Kenitzer 2016 Abstract Plans developed as a result of Hurricane Katrina and the Mississippi Renewal Forum, including the de facto nullified SmartCode, three vacated SmartCode Community Plans, and two tabled and non-adopted Comprehensive Plans failed. Further indicated by a gap between Plan vision and on-the-ground results, other authors and scholars point to the process of Plan implementation as the key to this failure. Despite this observation, a case study of implementation does not exist. Also, few academic case studies that explore the implementation of Plans exist. To explore ‘Why Plans Fail’ this dissertation employs a Case Study approach, rooted in Grounded Theory Methodology and the Constant Comparative method. Five methods of analysis include two forms of Plan evaluation, document analysis, semi-structured interviews, and a new exploratory method of Tenure Analysis. Findings derived from analysis explore the roles of implementation experience, expectations, and externalities in Plan and policy failure. The research concludes by arguing for further case studies, a careful rethinking of how the American Planning Association approaches their advocate role, and that Planners should stop treating implementation like the ‘black box’ of the Planning and Plan-Making process.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary & Secondary Sources
    Primary & Secondary Sources Brands & Products Agencies & Clients Media & Content Influencers & Licensees Organizations & Associations Government & Education Research & Data Multicultural Media Forecast 2019: Primary & Secondary Sources COPYRIGHT U.S. Multicultural Media Forecast 2019 Exclusive market research & strategic intelligence from PQ Media – Intelligent data for smarter business decisions In partnership with the Alliance for Inclusive and Multicultural Marketing at the Association of National Advertisers Co-authored at PQM by: Patrick Quinn – President & CEO Leo Kivijarv, PhD – EVP & Research Director Editorial Support at AIMM by: Bill Duggan – Group Executive Vice President, ANA Claudine Waite – Director, Content Marketing, Committees & Conferences, ANA Carlos Santiago – President & Chief Strategist, Santiago Solutions Group Except by express prior written permission from PQ Media LLC or the Association of National Advertisers, no part of this work may be copied or publicly distributed, displayed or disseminated by any means of publication or communication now known or developed hereafter, including in or by any: (i) directory or compilation or other printed publication; (ii) information storage or retrieval system; (iii) electronic device, including any analog or digital visual or audiovisual device or product. PQ Media and the Alliance for Inclusive and Multicultural Marketing at the Association of National Advertisers will protect and defend their copyright and all their other rights in this publication, including under the laws of copyright, misappropriation, trade secrets and unfair competition. All information and data contained in this report is obtained by PQ Media from sources that PQ Media believes to be accurate and reliable. However, errors and omissions in this report may result from human error and malfunctions in electronic conversion and transmission of textual and numeric data.
    [Show full text]
  • Membership Directory
    MEMBERSHIP DIRECTORY CHAMPIONING BUSINESS AND COMMUNITY Wichita Regional Chamber of Commerce Membership Directory 3 A Accel Construction, LLC 3B Vacations & Tours A & H Electric Inc. Mr. Tony Caputo Ms. Sherri Banks Mr. Dave Bowlin 4015 N. Woodlawn Ct., Ste. 1 2250 N. Rock Road, Ste. 118-127 3939 N. Bridgeport Cir. Wichita, KS 67220 Wichita, KS 67226 Wichita, KS 67219 316-866-2885 316-730-5355 316-838-3003 FAX: 316-866-2887 http://www.accelconstructionks.com http://www.3bvacations.com/ FAX: 316-838-8033 Travel Agencies http://www.ahelec.com Contractors - General Contractors - Electrical Accident Fund Insurance 3R Mechanical, Inc. Company of America Mr. Michael Strelow AAA Restaurant Supply LLC Mr. Mike Drake AU 300 Cain Dr. Mr. Tanner Erdman 200 N. Grand Ave. Haysville, KS 67060 611 E. Central Ave. Lansing, MI 48901 316-529-4372 Wichita, KS 67202 517-281-9813 FAX: 316-529-4395 316-265-4365 FAX: 517-316-2723 https://www.3rmechanical.com/ FAX: 316-265-4652 http://www.accidentfund.com/groups Contractors - Plumbing 800-351-9124 Insurance http://www.aaa-restaurant.com Restaurant Equipment 3ten Studio Action Tents & Party Rental Mr. Chad Glenn Ms. Tina Dunnegan 919 W. 2nd N. AARP Kansas 4440 Southeast Blvd., Bldg. 1 Wichita, KS 67203 Ms. Andrea Bozarth Wichita, KS 67210 316-259-9309 6220 SW 29th St. Ste. 300 316-687-4400 http://www.3tenstudio.com Topeka, KS 66614 FAX: 316-687-4592 Architects 316-558-3765 http://www.actiontentparty.com http://www.aarp.org/ks Party Rental Equipment Non-Profit Organization 6 ActionCOACH Business ABC Recycling, LLC 6 Meridian Coaching Ms.
    [Show full text]
  • 119,438 – in the Matter of the Equalization Appeals of Kansas
    Case 119438 CLERK OF THE APPELLATE COURTS Filed 2019 Jul 03 PM 3:43 No. 18-119438-A IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS IN THE MATTER OF THE EQUALIZATION APPEAL OF KANSAS STAR CASINO, L.L.C. FOR THE YEAR 2016 IN SUMNER COUNTY, KANSAS IN THE MATTER OF THE EQUALIZATION APPEAL OF KANSAS STAR CASINO, L.L.C. FOR THE YEAR 2017 IN SUMNER COUNTY, KANSAS BRIEF OF APPELLEE AND BRIEF OF CROSS-APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE BOARD OF TAX APPEAL NOS. 2016-2148-EQ, 2016-2149-EQ, 2017-3172-EQ, AND 2017-3173-EQ Andrew D. Holder, #25456 FISHER, PATTERSON, SAYLER & SMITH, L.L.P. 3550 S.W. 5th Street Topeka, KS 66606 Office: (785) 232-7761 - Fax: (785) 232-6604 Email: dcooper(a?fisherpatterson.com / aholder(tl}fisherpatterson.com Attorneys for Appellee/Cross-Appellant Sumner County, Kansas ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED 30 MINUTES TABLE OF CONTENTS NATURE OF THE CASE .................................................................................................. .. 1 STATEMENT OF THE ISSUES ......................................................................................... ! STATEMENT OF FACTS .................................................................................................... ARGUMENTS AND AUTHORITIES ............................................................................ .. 17 I. Standard of Review ..................................................................................... 17 KS.A 77-601 ........................................................................................................... 17 KS.A 77-621 ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Project Report Event Center Feasibility Study/Business Plan
    Project Report Event Center Feasibility Study/Business Plan Prepared for The Twin Falls County Fair Twin Falls, Idaho Submitted by AECOM Technical Services, Inc. (AECOM) March 2, 2016 Project No. 60446800 303 East Wacker Drive Suite 600 Chicago, IL 60601 312.373.7558 FAX 312.373.6800 www. aecom.com Table of Contents I. Introduction and Executive Summary ................................................................................. 5 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 5 Executive Summary ................................................................................................................. 5 II. Economic and Demographic Analysis................................................................................. 9 Population................................................................................................................................. 9 Age ......................................................................................................................................... 10 Households............................................................................................................................. 11 Income .................................................................................................................................... 11 Employment............................................................................................................................ 12 Visitor Infrastructure
    [Show full text]
  • 119,438 – in the Matter of the Equalization Appeals of Kansas
    Case 119438 CLERK OF THE APPELLATE COURTS Filed 2019 Oct 23 AM 10:25 No. 2018-119438-A IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KANSAS IN THE MATTER OF THE EQUALIZATION APPEAL OF KANSAS STAR CASINO, L.L.C. FOR THE YEAR 2016 IN SUMNER COUNTY, KANSAS IN THE MATTER OF THE EQUALIZATION APPEAL OF KANSAS STAR CASINO, L.L.C. FOR THE YEAR 2017 IN SUMNER COUNTY, KANSAS REPLY BRIEF OF APPELLANT AND BRIEF OF CROSS-APPELLEE APPEAL FROM THE KANSAS BOARD OF TAX APPEALS DOCKET NOS. 2016-2148-EQ, 2016-2149-EQ, 2017-3172-EQ, AND 2017-3173-EQ Jarrod C. Kieffer (#21872) STINSONLLP 1625 N. Waterfront Parkway, Suite 300 Wichita, Kansas 67206-6620 Telephone: (316) 265-8800 Facsimile: (316) 265-1349 iarrodJdeffor(o)stinson.com Attorneys for Appellant, Kansas Star Casino, L.L.C. Oral Argument: 30 minutes CORE/0502372.0062/155465635.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS REPLY TO STATEMENTS OF FACT ....................................................................................... 1 REPLY TO ARGUMENTS AND AUTHORITIES ..................................................................... 6 I. Standard of Review ......................................................................................................... 6 Marriott Corp. v. Bd. of County Commissioners of Johnson County, 25 Kan. App. 2d 840 (1999) ....................................................................................... 6 In re Graham-Michaelis Corp., 27 Kan. App. 2d 467 (2000) ....................................................................................... 6 In re Equalization Proceeding of the
    [Show full text]