Containing Humour: the Humorist As Prisoner in Twentieth-Century Literature

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Containing Humour: the Humorist As Prisoner in Twentieth-Century Literature Containing Humour: The Humorist as Prisoner in Twentieth-Century Literature by Jeanne Mathieu-Lessard A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Centre for Comparative Literature University of Toronto © Copyright by Jeanne Mathieu-Lessard 2017 Containing Humour: The Humorist as Prisoner in Twentieth-century Literature Jeanne Mathieu-Lessard Doctor of Philosophy Centre for Comparative Literature University of Toronto 2017 Abstract The boundary-crossing categories of the prison, society, and the body, are spaces of constraint for literary characters which trigger humour in the works of five twentieth-century authors: Romain Gary, Giovannino Guareschi, Wyndham Lewis, Vladimir Nabokov and Luigi Pirandello. These categories encompass a multiplicity of configurations of imprisonment, from the prison cell to ventriloquism. In twentieth-century fictions, spaces of imprisonment not only provide the setting and the cause for many humoristic situations, but they often become the root of a humoristic view of the human condition. Taking imprisonment as a concrete spatial setting or a metaphorical image, my work analyzes confinement as a trigger for humour—indeed, as an essential structural condition for the emergence of twentieth-century humour. By comparing prominent modernist authors such as Nabokov and Pirandello with less studied ones such as Guareschi, individual thematic studies highlight the development of a paradigm which crosses languages, literary genres, and so-called national styles. Chapter 1 maps out a theoretical and chronological outline of humour in the twentieth century, highlighting recurring structures such as the split self, the association of opposites or the self-reflexivity inherent in humour, in order to prepare the ground for the following three thematic ii chapters, centred around the figures of the prison cell, society, and the body. Chapter 2 discusses three cases of political imprisonment in the fiction of Guareschi, Gary and Nabokov. Chapter 3 considers the difficult social positioning of three types of characters Bakhtin identifies as influential in the development of modern fiction, the Fool, the Rogue and the Clown, by singling out three characters in the works of Pirandello, Lewis, and Gary. Chapter 4 deals with the negotiation of bodily imprisonment and discusses characters either trapped within their own bodies (Nabokov, Guareschi) or the bodies of others (Gary). I conclude by reflecting on humour’s geometry, highlighting the main structure underlying the relationship between humour and imprisonment in the fiction studied: the figure of the prison frames the unceasing oscillatory movement of literary humour, paradoxically asserting the narratives’ desire to expand and not to conclude. iii Résumé Cette thèse explore les catégories de la prison, de la société et du corps comme espaces de contrainte provoquant la création de l’humour dans l’œuvre de cinq auteurs : Romain Gary, Giovannino Guareschi, Wyndham Lewis, Vladimir Nabokov et Luigi Pirandello. Ces catégories comprennent une multiplicité de configurations de l’emprisonnement, de la cellule de prison à la ventriloquie. Dans les œuvres à l’étude, les espaces de l’emprisonnement fournissent non seulement le cadre et la cause de nombreuses situations humoristiques, mais deviennent aussi souvent la source même de la conception humoristique de la vie développée par les personnages. En considérant l’emprisonnement à la fois comme environnement physique concret et comme image métaphorique, j’analyse le confinement comme amorce pour l’humour — en fait, comme condition structurelle essentielle à l’émergence de l’humour au vingtième siècle. En comparant des auteurs éminents dans leurs contextes respectifs, comme Nabokov et Pirandello, avec des auteurs encore peu étudiés tels que Guareschi, mes études relèvent la présence d’un paradigme qui s’établit au-delà des barrières linguistiques, des genres littéraires et des styles « nationaux ». Le Chapitre 1 établit le cadre théorique en lisant les théories de façon chronologique, et en soulignant les structures récurrentes telles que le clivage du moi, l’association des contraires et l’autoréflexivité inhérente à l’humour, afin de préparer le terrain pour les trois chapitres thématiques qui suivent, centrés autour des figures de la prison, de la société et du corps. Le Chapitre 2, « Humour in the Cell: Prison Cells and War Camps » (« L’humour en cellule : cellules de prison et camps de guerre »), traite de trois cas d’emprisonnement politique dans la fiction de Guareschi, Gary et Nabokov. Le Chapitre 3, « Social Entrapment: Humoristic Characters vs. the World » (« Le piège social : les personnages humoristiques contre le monde ») considère le positionnement social difficile de trois types de personnages identifiés par Bakhtin comme étant au cœur du développement de la fiction moderne, soit le sot, le fripon et le bouffon, en iv sélectionnant trois personnages des œuvres de Pirandello, Lewis et Gary. Enfin, le Chapitre 4, « Humour in the Cells: Configurations of the Body as Prison » (« L’humour en cellules : configurations du corps comme prison »), traite de la négociation de l’emprisonnement corporel chez des personnages prisonniers de leurs propres corps (Nabokov, Guareschi) ou du corps d’un autre personnage (Gary). Je conclus par une réflexion sur la géométrie de l’humour qui souligne le mouvement de fond gouvernant la relation de l’humour à l’emprisonnement dans la fiction étudiée : la figure de la prison sert ainsi de cadre pour contenir le mouvement oscillatoire incessant de l’humour littéraire, faisant paradoxalement valoir le désir d’expansion de la forme narrative. v AcKnowledgments I am grateful to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for the Joseph-Armand Bombardier CGS Doctoral Scholarship, to the University of Toronto for the Avie Bennett Award, to the Jackman Humanities Institute for the Chancellor Jackman Graduate Fellowship in the Humanities, and to the Ontario government for the Lorie Waisberg Ontario Graduate Scholarship, that have made this research possible. I would like to thank all the people who have supported me, and to acknowledge the places that have hosted my writing. My co-directors, Pascal Michelucci and Luca Somigli, and my advisor Ann Komaromi, have been invaluable for the breadth of their knowledge, their constant help and their faith in my project from its inception to the end of the writing process. I want to thank Jill Ross, Eva-Lynn Jagoe, Linda Hutcheon, and Veronika Ambros for their professional and personal advice and support, as well as Bao Nguyen and Aphrodite Gardner of the Centre for Comparative Literature for being awesome. I sincerely thank Miranda Hickman for her generous reading and attentive comments as external appraiser on my final oral examination. I am indebted to the 2014-2015 Jackman Humanities Institute (JHI) fellows and to the members of the 2015-2016 JHI Working Group “Humour, Seriously,” and particularly to Matt Cohn, Maggie Hennefeld, Peter Jones and Matt Risling for sharing their passion for humour studies with me. My kind thanks go to Alberto Guareschi and the late Carlotta Guareschi for their precious help before, during and after my 2014 visit to the Archivio Giovannino Guareschi in Roncole Verdi, and to Simonetta Bartolini, for her 2008 course dedicated to Guareschi and theories of humour, at La Libera Università degli Studi Per l’Innovazione e le Organizzazioni (LUSPIO). I am thankful to Christina Vani for her feedback on some of my translations from Italian. Thank you to the organizers, lecturers and participants of the International Summer School and Symposium in Brașov in July 2016, and to the organizers and participants of the Comparative Literature Students’ Tribune/La tribune des étudiant-e-s en littérature comparée for their encouragement, comments and feedback. I warmly thank the Knox College community, and especially Daniela D’Aniello and my friends William George, Alex Nica and Laura Grace Conlon. I am grateful to all my Toronto friends for their support and sense of community. Thank you Catherine Cheng, Isabella Huberman, Natasha Hay, Élise Couture-Grondin, Irina Sadovina, Nefise Kahraman, Catherine Schwartz, Jessica Copley, Katie Fry, Julie St-Laurent, Amanda Hsieh, Christina Brassard, ainsi que Lily Han et tous les Chameaux de Québec. From a brutalist carrel to the great Canadian plains, this thesis has been shaped by the surroundings of its writer. I thank Arnaud and Alexandra, in whose home I wrote the first lines of this work, and I am grateful for the existence and welcome of Knox College, the Centre for Comparative Literature, the University of Toronto’s dozens of libraries, Toronto’s coffee shops and Bampot House of Tea, Via Rail trains, as well as Saint-Jean-de-Brébeuf, Gafsa, London, Oxford, Dublin, Montréal, Ottawa, Québec City, la Côte-Nord, Roncole Verdi, Rome and Brașov. vi Je remercie ma mère et ma sœur pour leur appui, leur amour, leur patience et les mille cartes postales qui ont embelli le cubicule brutaliste. Nicolas, merci pour ta présence à mes côtés à Momaco, et pour ta soif de savoir et de beauté d’art. Je dédie cette thèse à la mémoire de mon père. À son humour. À sa liberté. vii Table of Contents Acknowledgments .................................................................................................................... vi Introduction ...........................................................................................................................1
Recommended publications
  • Grumpy Old Humorist Tells All: Three Short Essays on Writing, Plus Random Thoughts on Same by Ed Mcclanahan
    224 Ed McClanahan Grumpy Old Humorist Tells All: Three Short Essays On Writing, Plus Random Thoughts on Same by Ed McClanahan —“I can read readin’, but I can’t read writin’. The reason I can’t read writin’ is, it’s wrote too close to the paper.” —Clem Kadiddlehpopper When book reviewers deign to notice that I exist at all, they tend to refer to me as (among other lower life forms) a “humorist.” I’m always flattered, of course, to be nominated for the post, but I’m afraid I must politely decline to run, on the grounds that it would entail too much responsibility, trying to be funny all the time. The fact is, at my age, being funny ain’t really all that easy—or, to put it another way, being my age ain’t really all that funny . or, for that matter, all that easy either. We’ve all heard it said—usually of some poor, befuddled old bird like me—that “he’s taken leave of his senses.” What actually happens, though, is that our senses often pre- empt us to the punch, and take their own leave almost before we suspect they’re even contemplating a separation, much less a divorce. Corrective measures may, of course, sometimes be taken; cataract surgery is a wonder and a marvel, and I suppose there’s probably one of those “almost invisible” hearing aids circling my head at this very mo- ment, looking for an ear to build its unsightly nest in. My sense of smell has long since abandoned me (an impairment which, having its own occasional compensations, doesn’t even qualify me for disability assistance); and when it left, it took with it a disheartening measure of my sense of taste—so that, at dinnertime, I sit there grieving silently while everyone else is saying grace.
    [Show full text]
  • “The Grin of the Skull Beneath the Skin:” Reassessing the Power of Comic Characters in Gothic Literature
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Dissertations, Theses, and Student Research: Department of English English, Department of 12-2011 “The grin of the skull beneath the skin:” Reassessing the Power of Comic Characters in Gothic Literature Amanda D. Drake University of Nebraska-Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/englishdiss Part of the Literature in English, British Isles Commons Drake, Amanda D., "“The grin of the skull beneath the skin:” Reassessing the Power of Comic Characters in Gothic Literature" (2011). Dissertations, Theses, and Student Research: Department of English. 57. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/englishdiss/57 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the English, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Student Research: Department of English by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. “The grin of the skull beneath the skin:” Reassessing the Power of Comic Characters in Gothic Literature by Amanda D. Drake A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of The Graduate College at the University of Nebraska In Partial Fulfillment of Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy English Nineteenth-Century Studies Under the Supervision of Professor Stephen Behrendt Lincoln, Nebraska December, 2011 “The grin of the skull beneath the skin:” 1 Reassessing the Power of Comic Characters in Gothic Literature Amanda D. Drake, Ph.D. University of Nebraska, 2011 Advisor: Dr. Stephen Behrendt Neither representative of aesthetic flaws or mere comic relief, comic characters within Gothic narratives challenge and redefine the genre in ways that open up, rather than confuse, critical avenues.
    [Show full text]
  • Stand-Up Comedy in Theory, Or, Abjection in America John Limon 6030 Limon / STAND up COMEDY / Sheet 1 of 160
    Stand-up Comedy in Theory, or, Abjection in America John Limon Tseng 2000.4.3 18:27 6030 Limon / STAND UP COMEDY / sheet 1 of 160 Stand-up Comedy in Theory, or, Abjection in America 6030 Limon / STAND UP COMEDY / sheet 2 of 160 New Americanists A series edited by Donald E. Pease Tseng 2000.4.3 18:27 Tseng 2000.4.3 18:27 6030 Limon / STAND UP COMEDY / sheet 3 of 160 John Limon Duke University Press Stand-up Comedy in Theory, or, Abjection in America Durham and London 2000 6030 Limon / STAND UP COMEDY / sheet 4 of 160 The chapter ‘‘Analytic of the Ridiculous’’ is based on an essay that first appeared in Raritan: A Quarterly Review 14, no. 3 (winter 1997). The chapter ‘‘Journey to the End of the Night’’ is based on an essay that first appeared in Jx: A Journal in Culture and Criticism 1, no. 1 (autumn 1996). The chapter ‘‘Nectarines’’ is based on an essay that first appeared in the Yale Journal of Criticism 10, no. 1 (spring 1997). © 2000 Duke University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper ! Typeset in Melior by Tseng Information Systems, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data appear on the last printed page of this book. Tseng 2000.4.3 18:27 6030 Limon / STAND UP COMEDY / sheet 5 of 160 Contents Introduction. Approximations, Apologies, Acknowledgments 1 1. Inrage: A Lenny Bruce Joke and the Topography of Stand-Up 11 2. Nectarines: Carl Reiner and Mel Brooks 28 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Comic Vision and Comic Elements of the 18 Century Novel Moll Flanders by Daniel Defoe
    Pamukkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi Sayı 25/1,2016, Sayfa 230-238 COMIC VISION AND COMIC ELEMENTS OF THE 18TH CENTURY NOVEL MOLL FLANDERS BY DANIEL DEFOE Gülten SİLİNDİR∗ Abstract “It is hard to think about the art of fiction without thinking about the art of comedy, for the two have always gone together, hand in hand” says Malcolm Bradbury, because the comedy is the mode one cannot avoid in a novel. Bradbury asserts “the birth of the long prose tale was, then the birth of new vision of the human comedy and from that time it seems prose stories and comedy have never been far apart” (Bradbury, 1995: 2). The time when the novel prospers is the time of the development of the comic vision. The comic novelist Iris Murdoch in an interview in 1964 states that “in a play it is possible to limit one’s scope to pure tragedy or pure comedy, but the novel is almost inevitably an inclusive genre and breaks out of such limitations. Can one think of any great novel which is without comedy? I can’t.” According to Murdoch, the novel is the most ideal genre to adapt itself to tragicomedy. Moll Flanders is not a pure tragedy or pure comedy. On the one hand, it conveys a tragic and realistic view of life; on the other hand, tragic situations are recounted in a satirical way. Moll’s struggles to live, her subsequent marriages, her crimes for money are all expressed through parody. The aim of this study is to analyze 18th century social life, the comic scenes and especially the satire in the novel by describing the novel’s techniques of humor.
    [Show full text]
  • Donoso the Humorist: a Study of Entropy
    DONOSO THE HUMORIST: A STUDY OF ENTROPY _____________________________________________________ A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board _____________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY _____________________________________________________ by John A. Cunicelli August 2017 Examining Committee Members: Hortensia Morell, Advisory Chair, Department of Spanish and Portuguese Hiram Aldarondo, Department of Spanish and Portuguese Sergio Ramírez-Franco, Department of Spanish and Portuguese Michael Colvin, External Reader, Marymount Manhattan College ii © Copyright 2017 by John A. Cunicelli All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Donoso the Humorist: A Study of Entropy John A. Cunicelli Doctor of Philosophy Temple University, 2017 Doctoral Advisory Committee Chair: Hortensia Morell For over two millennia, humor has been the topic of philosophical discussion since it appears to be a nearly universal element of human experience and offers different perspectives on that experience. Humor delves deep into the cultural norms governing religion, family, sex, society, and other aspects of day to day life in order to investigate the absurdities therein. Viewing such reified aspects of life in a new, humorous light is one of the principal characteristics of the Chilean author José Donoso’s novels. Oftentimes irreverent and scathing, Donoso’s dark humor reaches entropic proportions since it accentuates (and at times even seems to celebrate) the human condition’s descent into chaos. Given this downward trajectory, a selection of the Chilean author’s novels will be analyzed under the entropic humor theory originated by literary theorist Patrick O’Neill. The notion of entropy contains the very idea of a breakdown of order that tends toward chaos, so this special brand of humor is a unique fit for a study of Donoso.
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography
    Bibliography Bibliography Primary Sources Addison, Joseph. The Works of Joseph Addison. Ed. Richard Hurd. London: George Bell & Sons, 1893. Addison, Joseph and Richard Steele. The Spectator. 5 volumes. Ed. Donald F. Bond. Oxford: Claren- don P, 1965. Beowulf. A Verse Translation. Ed. Michael Alexander. London: Penguin, 2001. Boileau, Despréaux, Nicolas. L’Art Poétique. Ed. D. Nichol Smith. London: Cambridge UP, 1907. —————. The Art of Poetry Written in French by Sieur de Boileau. In Four Canto’s. Made English by Sir William Soames. By Since Revis’d by John Dryden, Esq. London: Printed and Sold by H. Hills, 1710. Eighteenth Century Collections Online. Web. 26 Nov. 2009. —————. Œuvres poétiques; suivies d’Oeuvres en prose. Paris: Ernest Flammarion, 1935. Bouhours, Dominique. “The Conversations of Aristo and Eugene.” The Continental Model: Selected French Critical Essays of the Seventeenth Century in English Translation. Eds. Scott Elledge and Don- ald Schier. Ithaca: Cornell University, 1970. —————. La Manière de bien penser dans les ouvrages d’esprit. Dialogues. A Amsterdam: Aux dépens d’Estienne Roger Marchand libraire, chez qui l’on trouve un assortiment général de toute sorte de musique très correctement corrigée, & qu’il vendra toûjours á meilleur marché que qui que ce soit quand même il devroit la donner pour rien, 1709. —————. Les Entretiens d’Ariste et d’Eugene. A Amsterdam : Aux dépens d’Estienne Roger, Marchand Libraire chez qui l’on trouve un assortiment général de toute sorte de Musique, 1703. —————. The Art of Criticism: or, the Method of Making a Right Judgment upon Subjects of Wit and Learn- ing. Translated from the best edition of the French, of the famous Father Bohours, by a person of quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Mark Twain's Subtle Sword of Satire
    Mark Twain’s Subtle Sword of Satire 3-5 class days High School English DESIRED RESULTS: What are the “big ideas” that drive this lesson? Students will be able to identify satire and its intended point and target as it was employed by Mark Twain. They then should be able to employ the same technique of writing to satirize an aspect of modern society. What are the “essential questions” that students must answer in order to understand the “big ideas?” What is satire and why is it used? What is a humorist, and how does Mark Twain exemplify a humorist? What is an aphorism, and how can it be used as satire? CORE UNDERSTANDINGS: Identify what students will know and/or be able to do. Students will be able to define “satire” and recognize it in Mark Twain’s literature. Students will be able to differentiate between blatant and more subtle forms of humorous satire. Students will be able to write their own satirical work on a foible of modern society to emulate the style of Mark Twain. SUGGESTED ASSESSMENTS: In small groups, students examine the more dark satire that is present in chapter XXI and XXII (the description of the town in Arkansas and Col. Sherburn’s speech). Each group determines Twain’s purpose in the satire, the target he is focused on, and the devices he uses to both bring in comedy/humor while also pointing out a serious message. Following chapter XXII, individually, students find an example of dark/subtle satire and write a multi-paragraph response that determines Twain’s purpose in the satire, the target he is focused on, and the devices he uses to both bring in comedy/humor while also pointing out a serious message.
    [Show full text]
  • THE JUDICIAL HUMORIST. by William L. Prosser. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1952
    University of Miami Law Review Volume 7 Number 3 Article 25 4-1-1953 THE JUDICIAL HUMORIST. By William L. Prosser. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1952. Clifford C. Alloway University of Miami School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Clifford C. Alloway, THE JUDICIAL HUMORIST. By William L. Prosser. Boston: Little, Brown, and Company, 1952., 7 U. Miami L. Rev. 450 (1953) Available at: https://repository.law.miami.edu/umlr/vol7/iss3/25 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Miami Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Miami School of Law Institutional Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MIAMI LAW QUARTERLY return from Moscow will prove itself in the future developments of our American-Soviet policies. 2 The reviewer feels that a statement from one of Mr. Kennan's speeches emphasizes the thoughts which he has generally expressed in American Diplomacy, to wit: . .. join me in recognizing the profundity of the foreign policy problems with which we are faced today; that you recognize the depth intime and space of the origin of those problems; and that you do not be misled into the easy conclusion that the dangers and challenges and dilemmas of world situation are the product of the mistakes or the ill will of any individuals who bear responsibility at this moment for the conduct of foreign affairs.
    [Show full text]
  • Satire As the Driving Force in Stowe's Uncle Tom's Cabin Jennifer Reisch South Dakota State University
    The Journal of Undergraduate Research Volume 2 Journal of Undergraduate Research, Volume Article 11 3: 2004 2004 "He Hath Wrong'd Himself ": Satire as the Driving Force In Stowe's Uncle Tom's Cabin Jennifer Reisch South Dakota State University Follow this and additional works at: http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/jur Part of the American Literature Commons, and the Literature in English, North America Commons Recommended Citation Reisch, Jennifer (2004) ""He Hath Wrong'd Himself": Satire as the Driving Force In Stowe's Uncle Tom's Cabin," The Journal of Undergraduate Research: Vol. 2, Article 11. Available at: http://openprairie.sdstate.edu/jur/vol2/iss1/11 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in The ourJ nal of Undergraduate Research by an authorized administrator of Open PRAIRIE: Open Public Research Access Institutional Repository and Information Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SATIRE IN STOWE'S UNCLE TOM'S CABIN 65 "He Hath Wrong'd Himself": Satire as the Driving Force In Stowe's Uncle Tom's Cabin Author: Jennifer Reisch Faculty Sponsor: Dr. Mary R. Ryder Department: English Why, who cries out on pride That can therein tax any private party? Doth it not flow as hugely as the sea, [ ] Who can come in and say that I mean her. When such a one as she, such is her neighbor? Or what is he of basest function That says his bravery is not on my cost.
    [Show full text]
  • Humour and Irony in Jane Austen's Sense and Sensibility
    International Journal of Research ISSN NO:2236-6124 HUMOUR AND IRONY IN JANE AUSTEN’S SENSE AND SENSIBILITY K.ISHWARYA II M.A ENGLISH, S.T.E.T WOMEN’S COLLEGE, MANNARGUDI V.REGA ASSISTANT PROFESOR, DEPT. OF ENGLISH, S.T.E.T WOMEN’S COLLEGE, MANNARGUDI ABSTRACT The novel ‘Sense and Sensibility’ is rich in ‘Humour and Irony’. The humour of Jane Austen grows subtler in her later novels but it is never again more triumphantly fanny. She has a genius for using irony in her novel. Jane Austen is a first-rate humorist and belong, in fact, to the category of the foremost humorists in English literature. The irony employed by her is, therefore, necessarily of the comic kind. Sir John Middleton is so foolish that he relates Willoughby’s cruelty with his riding, and the folly’s puppies he had given him. Mrs. Palmer sympathies with Marianne by wishing that Combe Magna was not near Cleveland. Her greatest triumph in the use of comic irony is her novel ‘Emma’, ‘Sense and Sensibility’ is somewhat deficient absent from it. The present article examines and analysis the psychological, humour and irony and satire involved in this novel by Jane Austen. INTRODUCTION ‘Jane Austen’ is certainly respected as one of the great humourists in English novel. Comedy is our corresponding weapon against the forces of disintegration within human society, and against the germs of anarchy and defeatism in our own minds. The artistic detachment, which expresses itself in proportion and balance, is pre-requistite of comedy. The sense of humour, though not identical with this kind of detachment usually accompanies of sense of humour.
    [Show full text]
  • Stand-Up Comedy and Progressive Social Change David M
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School January 2015 Was It Something They Said? Stand-up Comedy and Progressive Social Change David M. Jenkins University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Communication Commons, Philosophy Commons, and the Sociology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Jenkins, David M., "Was It Something They aidS ? Stand-up Comedy and Progressive Social Change" (2015). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/5710 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Was It Something They Said? Stand-up Comedy and Progressive Social Change by David M. Jenkins A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy with a concentration in Performance Studies Department of Communication College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Co-Major Professor: Elizabeth Bell, Ph.D. Co-Major Professor: A. David Payne, Ph.D. Mahuya Pal, Ph.D. John Barnshaw, Ph.D. Date of Approval: June 26, 2015 Keywords: Culture, Humor, Performance, Rhetoric Copyright © 2015, David M. Jenkins DEDICATION This project is dedicated to many, all of whom are partially responsible for getting me here. First, the educators: Dr. Lee Beger, Dr. Patrick Finelli, David Frankel, Dr. Ralf Remshardt, Dr. Mikell Pinkney, Dr. David Shelton, Dr. Stacy Holman Jones, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • ABSTRACT the Legitimacy of the Comic: Kierkegaard and The
    ABSTRACT The Legitimacy of the Comic: Kierkegaard and the Importance of the Comic for His Ethics and Theology Will Williams, Ph.D. Mentor: Paul Martens, Ph.D. While some consider the comic to be a trivial subject, fit mainly for amusement or distraction, Søren Kierkegaard disagrees. This dissertation examines Kierkegaard’s understanding of the nature of the comic and how he believes even the triviality of comic jest to be deeply tied to ethical and theological earnestness. First, I examine Kierkegaard’s understanding of the comic, irony, and humor, drawing primarily from Concluding Unscientific Postscript (1846). I argue that, for Kierkegaard, the comic is a contradiction or misrelation that is essentially though not absolutely painless, providing a “way out.” The comic is a contradiction between norms, suggesting that it springs from one’s perspective in a way that holds important implications for one’s ethical and theological worldview. Kierkegaard believes that subjective development is closely tied to one’s capacity to perceive the comic, making the comic both diagnostic of and formative for one’s subjective state. For him, the Christian is far from humorless, instead having the maximum human capacity to perceive the comic. Next, I show that the previously argued conception of the comic can be found in other works by Kierkegaard: Prefaces (1844), Upbuilding Discourses in Various Spirits (1847), and the Corsair affair (c.1845-1848). Then, I examine representatives of the Deconstructionist tradition of reading Kierkegaard, namely Louis Mackey, Roger Poole, Elsebet Jegstrup, and Mark C. Taylor. I argue that, while they accurately perceive the widespread irony in Kierkegaard’s corpus, they incorrectly conclude that such irony is a sign of his lack of earnest interest in philosophy and theology.
    [Show full text]