Terminal Evaluation of Support to Rural Development in Georgia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Terminal Evaluation of Support to Rural Development in Georgia TERMINAL EVALUATION OF SUPPORT TO RURAL DEVELOPMENT IN GEORGIA Hamid R. Chaudhry Team Leader/International Evaluation Consultant and Kartlos Gviniashvili – Local Consultant December 2018 CONTENTS Acknowledgement …………………………………………………….…………………………… Acronym and abbreviation ………………………………………………………………...….…… Executive summary ………………………………………………………………………...……… 1 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ……………………….……………..………………. 4 1.1. Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………… 4 1,2. Description of intervention …… ………………………….…………………………...……… 4 1.3. Contextual information ……………………………………………………………..………… 6 1.4. Evaluation purpose and objective ..……………….…………………………………………… 7 1.5 Evaluation scope ……………………………………………………………………………….. 8 1.6. Evaluation approach and methodology ……………………………...………………………… 9 2. EVALUATION FINDINGS ……………………………………………………………………… 12 2.1. Relevance and appropriateness …..…………………………………………………….……… 12 2.2. Efficiency ……………………………………………………………………………………… 13 2.2.1. Financial resources and management ………………………………………………..……. 14 2.2.2. Human resources (Staff input) ………………………………………………………...……. 17 2.2.3. Organization and management ………………………………………………………...…… 18 2.2.4. Monitoring and evaluation …………………………………………………………….……. 19 2.3. Effectiveness ………………………………………………… ……..………………………… 21 2.3.1. Output 1: Institutional capacity in place for the development and implementation of a 22 National Policy on Rural Development in Georgia. …………….......…………….…………………… 2.3.2. Output 2: Institutional capacity in place for the implementation of the Rural Development 25 in Ajara AR ..……………………………………………………………………………………………....... 2.4. Impact ………………………..……………….……………………………………………..… 28 2.5. Sustainability ……………………………………………………….……………………….… 30 2.6. Visibility …………………………………………………………..……………………...…… 31 2.7. Cross-cutting issues …...………………………………………………………………….…… 32 2.7.1. Gender equality ……………………………………………………………………….………. 32 2.7.2. Human rights …………………………………………………………………………..……… 32 2.7.3. Vulnerable …………………………………………………………………………….….……. 33 2.7.4. Environment/Climate change ……………………………………………………..………… 33 2.8. Theory of change ……………………………………………………………………………… 34 2.9. Synergy with other projects and donors ………………………………………………………. 34 2.10. Internal and external factors affecting the project …………………………………………… 36 3. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS ………………………………………………… 38 3.1. Conclusion ……………………………………………………………………………..……… 38 3.2. Key lessons learnt ……………………………………………………………………….…….. 38 3.3. Recommendations ……………………………………………………………………..….…… 40 Annexes …………………………………………………………………………………….…….…… 44 Annex 1: Terms of Reference ………………………………………………………………………… 45 Annex 2: Evaluation Matrix ………………………………………………………………..….……… 55 Annex 3: Documents cited ……………………………………………………………………………. 57 Annex 4a: Questionnaire for participating Ministry ……………………………………………………………... 58 Annex 4b: Questionnaire for FGD with participation of rural development IACC working group members …... 60 Annex 4c: Questionnaire for participating municipalities ……………………………………………………….. 61 Annex 5: List of persons met …………………………………………….……………………...….…. 63 Annex 6: Summary of meetings ………..……………………………………………………………... 66 Annex 7: Resource and Results Framework ...…………………………………………….…….……. 78 i Terminal Evaluation of Support to Rural Development in Georgia Acknowledgements Many persons contributed to this terminal evaluation their names are listed in Annex 4 with heartfelt thanks. Evaluation Team wishes to express its gratitude to United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Country Office Georgia for its support on this evaluation. The evaluation team extends its sincere thanks to Mr. George Nanobashvili, Economic Development Team Leader UNDP CO for his rational comments. The team also owes thanks to Ms. Ketevan Khutsishvili, Programme Manager for Rural Development, European Union Delegate in Georgia. The Consultant is also indebted to Mr. Nodar Kereselidze, Project Manager, Georgia and Vakhtang Kontselidze Coordinator for Ajara Component, Support to Rural Development in Georgia (SRDG) Project and their teams is greatly appreciated for the constant support and providing the needed input to the mission. Special thanks of the Evaluation Team also go to Ms. Natia Berdzenishvili, Monitoring and Evaluation Coordinator SRDG who organized meetings and interviews with stakeholders and accompanied to the Ajara field visits. The cooperation extended by the representatives of the national and Ajara partner ministries, mayors, institutions and their staff during this evaluation was of great help and is gratefully acknowledged. The completion of this evaluation became possible only because of the freely given time and consideration of the Local Action Groups and AMAG beneficiary groups. And finally, the Team owes special thanks to Mr. Dimitri Mushtarauli who was instrumental in making our meetings succe4ssful with stakeholders in Tbilisi and visit to Ajara. In accordance with normal practice, the contents of this report are the sole responsibility of the author and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the United Nations Development Programme. Evaluation Team Terminal Evaluation of Support to Rural Development in Georgia Acronyms and Abbreviations AA Association Agreement ACDA Agriculture Cooperatives Development Agency AMAG Georgian acronym meaning Active Citizens’ Local Group AP Action Plan APMA Agriculture Projects Management Agency AR Autonomous Republic CO Country Office CPD Country Programme Document CSOs Civil society organizations ENPARD The European Neighborhood Programme for Agriculture and Rural Development ERDN European Rural Development Network ESC ENPARD Steering Committee EStC ENPARD Stakeholder Committee EU European Union EUR Euro EU European Union FAO Food and Agriculture Organization FGD Focus group discussion GALAG Georgian Association of Local Action Groups GNTA Georgian National Tourism Administration GoG Government of Georgia GRDN Georgian Rural Development Network IACC Inter-Agency Coordination Council KPI Key Performance Indicator LAG Local Action Group LEADER A French acronym meaning Links between actions for the development of the rural economy LEPL Legal Entity of Public Law MEPA Ministry of Environmental Protection and Agriculture MRDI Ministry of Regional Development and Infrastructure MESD Ministry of Economy and Sustainable Development MoA Ministry of Agriculture NGO Non-Governmental Organization GRDN Georgian Rural Development Network RDC Rural Development Council RDS Rural Development Strategy RDP Rural Development Programmes SADG Strategy for Agriculture Development in Georgia SDG Sustainable Development Goal SRDG Support to Rural Development of Georgia ToC Theory of change ToR Terms of Reference UNDAF United Nations Development Assistance Framework UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNEG United Nations Evaluation Gro Terminal Evaluation of Support to Rural Development in Georgia Map of Georgia Terminal Evaluation of Support to Rural Development in Georgia EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background The terminal evaluation of the ENPARD II ‘Support to Rural Development in Georgia’ (SRDG) Project commissioned by the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Country Office (CO) Georgia was undertaken by an independent evaluation team. The evaluation was conducted from 30th November to 31st December 2018. The country mission was carried out from 15th to 27th December. Substantive interviews and meetings were held with the project team, partner ministries and key stakeholders in Tbilisi and Ajara. SRDG with an input of US$ 2.90 million was implemented from July 2016 to December 2018. The main donor was European Union (EU) with an input of US$ 2.76 million and co-financed by the Ajara Autonomous Republic (AR) with a contribution of US$ 135,610. The Project was part of a wider range of the activities funded by the European Neighborhood Partnership Agriculture and Rural Development (ENPARD II). The overall purpose or the evaluation was to provide an independent assessment of the project in terms of progress and challenges, measure achievement of the project results, assess gaps and lessons learned and provide recommendations to guide implementation of the next phase of the project. The evaluation scope covered the project period from inception in June 2016 to December 2018. Methodology The evaluation of Project followed a mixed method approach through multiple methods to satisfactorily respond to the requirements of the evaluation. The primary data was collected through extensive interviews, vigorous consultations and focus group discussions with the Project team, various cadres of staff of lead and line ministries and institutions, local governments, Local Action Groups (LAGs)/ Active Citizens' Local Unions (AMAG), Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) and active citizens and all categories of the project beneficiaries. The secondary data for evaluation was drawn through desk review of relevant documents and reports produced by the project, UNDP, Governments of Georgia (GoG) and Ajara AR, development partners and other donors. The evaluation team did not encounter any major challenge during the process of evaluation except the limited time available that did not allow the mission to cover more stakeholders. Main Findings Relevance of the project objective and the strategy to the national and regional was strong, as it appropriately addressed the national and regional priorities and needs. In the course of achieving these objectives, the project effectively responded the Strategy for Agricultural Development in Georgia 2015-2020 (SADG) and he
Recommended publications
  • Ensemble Basiani
    Friday, October 21, 2016, 8pm Venue to be announced Ensemble Basiani George Donadze, artistic director Zurab Tskrialashvili, director Irakli Tkvatsiria Giorgi Khunashvili Tornike Merabishvili Zviad Michilashvili George Gabunia Lasha Metreveli Elizbar Khachidze Batu Lominadze Sergo Urushadze Zaza Zuriashvili PROGRAM Mravalzhamier (Long Life) – Table Song, Kakheti Orira – Travelling Song, Guria Tu ase turpa ikavi (You Were So Pretty) – Lyric-Love Song Circle Dance – Svaneti Shavi shashvi (The Black Thrush) – Hunters’ Song, Guria Tsmidao gmerto (O, Holy God) Saidumlo utskho da didebuli (A Mystery, Strange and Most Glorious) Tkveta ganmatavisuflebelo (As the Deliverer of the Captives) Motsikuli kristesagan gamorcheuli (Apostle Distinguished by Christ) Akebdit sakhelsa uplisasa (Praise Ye the Name of the Lord) Sashot mtiebisa (Out of the Womb) Imeruli naduri – Work Song, Imereti Tsintsqaro – Lyric-Love Song, Kakheti Gandagan – Dancing Song, Adjara Khasanbegura – Historical Ballad, Guria Veengara – Lullaby, Samegrelo Chakrulo – Table Song, Kakheti Chochkhatura – Work Song, Guria Tonight’s concert will last approximately 75 minutes and will be performed without an intermission. PROGRAM NOTES FOLK SONGS Why couldn’t I notice that you were so pretty, little violet? Mravalzhamier (Long Life) is a supra song from —Because your heart is closed for love. Kakheti (a region in eastern Georgia). The Now I met a new gardener who filled me with Geor gian supra (“table party”) usually begins cares and love. with Mravalzhamier, creating a fes tive mood. He talked to me sweetly and held me on his lap. As voices rise, so does the spirit of everyone at the table. The gathering becomes a celebration. Circle Dance is from Svaneti, a mountainous nurtsa ikharos mterma chvenzeda, region in northwest Georgia.
    [Show full text]
  • Hate Speech and Xenophobia
    HATE SPEECH AND XENOPHOBIA მედიის განვითარების ფონდი MEDIA DEVELOPMENT FOUNDADTION MEDIA DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION HATE SPEECH XENOPHOBIA MEDIA MONITORING REPORT 2014-2015 MEDIA DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION Author: TAMAR KINTSURASHVILI Researchers: SOPHO GOGADZE, TATA KAPIANIDZE, TAMUNA KANDELAKI Design: BESO DANELIA, IBDESIGN The report is prepared by Media Development Foundation within the framework of the project “Advancing National Integra- tion in Georgia” implemented by United Nations Association of Georgia with the support of the United States Agency for In- ternational Development. The content of the report is responsibility of Media Development Foundation and do not necessarily reflect the views of the USAID and UNAG. © 2015, MEDIA DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION WWW.MDFGEORGIA.GE ISBN 978-9941-0-7733-3 INTRODUCTION The Media Development Foundation (MDF) has conducted media monitoring within the framework of Advancing National Integration in Georgia program. The aim of monitoring is to identify sources of hate speech, xenophobia, homophobia, gender discrimination and stereotyping, and anti-Western attitudes in media and public domain, in general. This study covers the period of one year (17 February 2014 –18 February 2015) and it exposes hate speech and discrimination on various grounds. The monitoring report represents a set of three editions: the first edition combines expressions of hate speech and xenophobia. For its part, the section on xenophobia is divided into subsections on a) various ethnic and national groups; b) Turkophobia/Islamophobia; c) Armenophobia; and d) religious discrimination. The second edition covers homophobic, discriminatory and stereotyped approaches to gender identity. The third edition reflects ant-Western attitudes. All the three editions have identical structure arranged according to the following sources: media, political parties and public organizations affiliated thereof, representatives of current and former authorities, religious servants, and other representatives of public i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM): Georgia Progress Report 2016- 2017
    Independent Reporting Mechanism (IRM): Georgia Progress Report 2016- 2017 Lasha Gogidze, Independent Researcher Tamar Gzirishvili, Independent Researcher Table of Contents Executive Summary: Georgia 3 1. Introduction 15 II. Context 16 III. Leadership and Multistakeholder Process 22 IV. Commitments 29 1. Adapting the Public Service Hall to the needs of people with disabilities 32 2. Launch of the unified healthcare system information portal 35 3. Introduction of electronic licensing system in the field of natural resource application 38 4. Creation of spatial (geographic) data web-portal for the energy sector 41 5. Creation of innovation ecosystem 44 6. Electronic portal for registering and disposal of state property – Customer’s Module 48 7. Development of the Freedom of Information Law 50 8. Development of a monitoring and assessment system of the Government policy and legislative acts 53 ✪ 9. Introduction of the public officials’ asset declarations monitoring system 56 10. Establishing unified regulations to publish court decisions 59 11. Development of transparency and integrity strategy and action plan in the field of regional development and infrastructure 62 12. Improvement of the database of the convicted and transfer of the penitentiary department entirely onto the electronic workflow management 66 13. Publication of phone tapping data according to the nature of the crime and geographic area 69 ✪14. Increasing citizen participation in supervision of public finances (public audit) 72 15. Electronic innovations for more transparency and efficiency of public procurement 77 ✪16. Adoption of the Environmental Assessment Code 81 17. Introduction of a mobile app as an alternative channel to connect to “112” 84 18.
    [Show full text]
  • Causes of War Prospects for Peace
    Georgian Orthodox Church Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung CAUSES OF WAR PROS P E C TS FOR PEA C E Tbilisi, 2009 1 On December 2-3, 2008 the Holy Synod of the Georgian Orthodox Church and the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung held a scientific conference on the theme: Causes of War - Prospects for Peace. The main purpose of the conference was to show the essence of the existing conflicts in Georgia and to prepare objective scientific and information basis. This book is a collection of conference reports and discussion materials that on the request of the editorial board has been presented in article format. Publishers: Metropolitan Ananya Japaridze Katia Christina Plate Bidzina Lebanidze Nato Asatiani Editorial board: Archimandrite Adam (Akhaladze), Tamaz Beradze, Rozeta Gujejiani, Roland Topchishvili, Mariam Lordkipanidze, Lela Margiani, Tariel Putkaradze, Bezhan Khorava Reviewers: Zurab Tvalchrelidze Revaz Sherozia Giorgi Cheishvili Otar Janelidze Editorial board wishes to acknowledge the assistance of Irina Bibileishvili, Merab Gvazava, Nia Gogokhia, Ekaterine Dadiani, Zviad Kvilitaia, Giorgi Cheishvili, Kakhaber Tsulaia. ISBN 2345632456 Printed by CGS ltd 2 Preface by His Holiness and Beatitude Catholicos-Patriarch of All Georgia ILIA II; Opening Words to the Conference 5 Preface by Katja Christina Plate, Head of the Regional Office for Political Dialogue in the South Caucasus of the Konrad-Adenauer-Stiftung; Opening Words to the Conference 8 Abkhazia: Historical-Political and Ethnic Processes Tamaz Beradze, Konstantine Topuria, Bezhan Khorava - A
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    SFG2732 Public Disclosure Authorized THE STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL HERITAGE ASSESSMENT OF THE REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND TOURISM DEVELOPMENT STARTEGIES OF SAMTSKHE-JAVAKHETI AND MTSKETA-MTIANETI Public Disclosure Authorized Third Regional Development Project Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized December, 2016 Abbreviations GNTA Georgia National Tourism Administration EIA Environnemental Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan RDS Regional Development Strategy RTDS Regional Tourism Development Strategy MDF Municipal Development Fund of Georgia MoA Ministry of Agriculture MoENRP Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources Protection of Georgia MoCMP Ministry of Culture and Monument Protection MESD Ministry of Economic and Sustaineble Developmnet NACHP National Agency for Cultural Heritage Protection PIU Project Implementation Unit RDP Regional Development Project SECHSA Strategic Environmental, Cultural Heritage and Social Assessment WB World Bank Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 1 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................... 12 1.1 THIRD REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (RDP III) ..................................................... 12 1.2 REGIONAL AND SECTORAL CONTEXT: RDS AND RTDS FOR SAMTSKHE- JAVAKHETI AND MTSKHETA-MTIANETI REGIONS ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Value Chain Analysis of Mandarin
    Value Chain Analysis of Mandarin In Adjara The project „Regional Civil Society Organizations Supporting Free Trade with Europe” is funded by European Union and implemented by People in Need This publication has been produced with the assistance of the European Union. Its contents are the sole responsibility of People in Need and PMC Research Centre and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Union. Tbilisi, 2018 Research Coordinator: Nino Khatisashvili Senior Researcher: Irakli (Rati) Kochlamazashvili Junior Researcher: Mariam Saghareishvili The following civil society organizations actively participated in the research process: - Khulo Local Action Group; - Keda Local Action Group; - „Black Sea Eco-Academy”; - „Union of Georgian Muslims”. Table of Contents 1. Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 7 2. The Aim of the Study ........................................................................................................................... 9 3. Methodology of Research ................................................................................................................. 10 3.1. Product Selection ....................................................................................................................... 10 3.2. Deskwork.................................................................................................................................... 10 3.3. Fieldwork ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Putinization of Georgia: Georgian Media After the Rose Revolution
    Putinization of Georgia: Georgian Media after the Rose Revolution Media in Georgia 2003-2007 The Human Rights Centre (HRIDC) is a non-governmental human rights organization, without any political or religious affiliations. The purpose of HRIDC is to increase respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms in Georgia, as well as to contribute to the democratic development of the country. HRIDC implements projects to ensure compliance with human rights laws and standards. We cooperate with international organizations and local organizations which also share our view that respect for human rights is a precondition for sustaining democracy and peace in Georgia. Contact Details: Human Rights Centre (HRIDC) 3a Kazbegi Ave., Entrance 2, 4th Floor, Apt. 22. Tbilisi, 0160 Georgia Tel: (+995 32) 37 69 50, (+995 32) 45 45 33; Fax: (+995 32) 37 69 50; Email: [email protected] Web-Site: www.hridc.org On-line magazine: www.humanrights.ge Prepared by: Eka Kevanishvili Simon Papuashvili Edited by: Wieteke Daniëls Ucha Nanuashvili 2 Content Executive Summary………………………………………………………………………………4 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………….... 7 Legal Assessment ………………………………………………………………………………....8 Central Media……………………………………………………………………………………..10 Assessment of the November Events..............................................................................................36 Experts’ Assessment……………………………………………………………………………….39 Regional Media …………………………………………………………………………………....43 Broadcasting Licenses Confiscated from their owners..................................................................67
    [Show full text]
  • Contextual Research of the Market Potential of Historical and Cultural Tourism in the Black Sea Basin
    www.greethis.net Contextual research of the market potential of historical and cultural tourism in the Black Sea basin Georgia November 2020 1 www.greethis.net The contextual research of the market potential of historical and cultural tourism in the Black Sea basin includes following particularly interesting municipalities - Batumi, Poti, Kobuleti, Lanchkhuti, of one of the most ancient countries of the Eastern Black Sea region – Georgia. Flag and coat of arms of Poti Municipality Flag and coat of arms of Lanchkhuti municipality Flag and coat of arms of Batumi municipality 2 www.greethis.net Flag and coat of arms of Kobuleti municipality 3 www.greethis.net Contents CHAPTER I ........................................................................................................ 6 About the project ............................................................................................. 6 CHAPTER II ........................................................................................................ 7 Green and Historical Tourism Trends in Georgia .......................................................... 7 Legislation, academic publications, articles ............................................................ 7 Statistical data ................................................................................................. 13 Resident Visitors ............................................................................................. 13 Non-resident visitors .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ART = HEART Youth Exchange 12-20 August, 2015
    ART = HEART Youth Exchange 12-20 August, 2015 KOBULETI, GEORGIA Students & Youth Development Centre _ SYDC Project Details: Project Name: ART = HEART Project Dates: 12-20 August, 2015 Place: Kobuleti, Georgia Organization: Students & Youth Development Centre _ SYDC Participant Countries: Participants in the project will belong to 6 different countries from: Georgia, Moldova, Armenia, Estonia, Latvia and Romania. PLACE DESCRIPTION: KOBULETI, GEORGIA Kobuleti (Georgian: ქობულეთი) is a town in Adjara, western Georgia, situated on the eastern coast of the Black Sea. It is a seaside resort, visited annually by Georgians and many former Soviet Union residents. From the 17th century into the 19th, Kobuleti was a fiefdom of the Tavdgiridze family, first under the authority of the Principality of Guria, and then of the Ottoman Empire. It was known as Çürüksu during Ottoman rule. Especially over the last decade popularity and the number of International Tourists has grown in Kobuleti. Nowadays, each year, more than 100 000 tourists visit in the summertime in Kobuleti. In the town there are international transit way of Batumi-Poti (S-2) and the railway station. There are also tea factory and other small canneries; Batumi and Lazeti residence of the Diocese; 11 Orthodox churches, 2 mosques, 4 parks and 15 hotels. (For more information follow these links: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kobuleti ; http://www.hotelscombined.com/Place/Kobuleti.htm ) Description of the project: 40 young people from seven different countries (Georgia, Lithuania, Moldova, Armenia, Italy, Ukraine and Portugal) will come together in Kobuleti, Georgia to promote Europe through art, music and theatre performances.
    [Show full text]
  • Agri-Tourism Strategy for Samtskhe-Javakheti and Kvemo Kartli Regions of Georgia
    Agri-Tourism Strategy for Samtskhe-Javakheti and Kvemo Kartli Regions of Georgia Tbilisi, Georgia February 2016 The present Strategy document was developed within the frames of the ongoing USAID-funded Project - Broadening Horizons: Improved Choices for Professional and Economic Development for Women and Girls. The project is being implemented by ICCN (International Center on Conflict and Negotiation) and Mercy Corps (The International Non-Governmental Organization). Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................... 3 Acronyms ............................................................................................................... 5 Strategy Development Methodology ..................................................................... 6 Defining Agritourism .............................................................................................. 7 Agritourism Benefits .............................................................................................. 7 Related Niche Tourism ........................................................................................... 9 The Global Tourism Environment ......................................................................... 11 World Tourism Trends ......................................................................................... 12 Background - Agriculture and Tourism in Georgia ................................................ 14 Agriculture in Georgia ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Caucasus Journal of Social Sciences
    Caucasus Journal of Social Sciences Caucasus Journal of Social Sciences Volume 4 Issue 1 The University of Georgia Press Tbilisi 2011 Caucasus Journal of Social Sciences UDC(uak) 908 (479) (06) k­144 Printed at The University of Georgia Copyright © 2011 by the University of Georgia. Conference Collected Works II International Conference Cultural Heritage Management_Problems and Perspectivs All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, in any form or any means, electornic, photocopinying, or otherwise, without prior written permission of The University of Georgia Press. No responsibility for the views expressed by authors in the Caucasus Journal of Social Sciences is assumed by the editors or the publisher. Caucasus Journal of Social Sciences The University of Georgia. Georgia, Tbilisi, 0175. M. Kostava Street 77 a, Building V. Tel: (+995 32) 24 11 44, E­mail: [email protected] [email protected] Copyright © 2011 Caucasus Journal of Social Sciences ISSN 1512­3677 2 Caucasus Journal of Social Sciences Contents Abesadze Irine, Kalandarishvili Mildred Methodological Aspects of Studying of a Cultural Heritage in the Georgian General Educational Space .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Asatiani Natia Proper Management as a Foundation for International Recognition Ful llment of an Artist on the Example of Art by M. Kukhashvili.............................................................. 11 Bakradze Maia
    [Show full text]
  • Jeremy Foutz, M.A., 2010
    ABSTRACT Title of Document: ANCIENTNESS AND TRADITIONALITY: CULTURAL INTERSECTIONS OF VOCAL MUSIC AND HISTORY IN THE REPUBLIC OF GEORGIA Jeremy Foutz, M.A., 2010 Directed By: Professor Robert C. Provine, School of Music Drawing on varied sources and personal fieldwork, data suggests the use of Georgian traditional music as a way for modern Georgians to reclaim and re-imagine the past. The history of Georgia and Georgian perspectives of history both gives context for the music and illustrates many modern Georgians‘ sense of being under siege. Within Georgian ethnomusicology and within the dominant Georgian culture itself, two concepts, ―traditionality‖ and ―ancientness,‖ play prominent roles in perspectives of Georgian traditional vocal music and identity formation. After describing traditionality and ancientness in the Georgian context, we explore several roles they play in the formation of Georgian identity. Many current Georgians, in choosing to practice traditionality with their musical performances and perceptions, draw close to their imagined, idealized past. Furthermore, ancientness of Georgian traditional vocal music helps defend the border against the ―theoretical other‖ – whether geographic neighbors or historical oppressors – through difference-making. ANCIENTNESS AND TRADITIONALITY: CULTURAL INTERSECTIONS OF VOCAL MUSIC AND HISTORY IN THE REPUBLIC OF GEORGIA By Jeremy Foutz Thesis submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Maryland, College Park, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts 2010 Advisory Committee: Professor Robert C. Provine, Chair Professor J. Lawrence Witzleben Professor Elizabeth Papazian © Copyright by Jeremy Foutz 2010 Acknowledgments Though this work is attributed to me, a long line of family, friends, professors, as well as many welcoming and patient Georgians deserve credit for this project.
    [Show full text]