Logan City Cdbg Access and Mobility Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Logan City Cdbg Access and Mobility Plan LOGAN CITY CDBG ACCESS AND MOBILITY PLAN DRAFT 6.28.2018 2 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Steering Committee Members Russ Akina - Parks and Recreation Becca Huppi - Community Development Cheryl Atwood - Options for Independence Mark Nielsen - Public Works Todd Beutler - CVTD Gordon Richins - CPD Keith Christiansen - USU LAEP/CPD Allison Richman - BRAG Zac Covington - BRAG Aaron Smith - Community Development Mike Desimone - Community Development James Geier - Community Development Logan City Mayor Holly H. Daines City Council Amy Z. Anderson Jess W. Bradfield Tom Jensen Herm Olsen Jeannie F. Simmonds DRAFT 6.28.2018 TABLE OF CONTENT Introduction ................................................................................................................................ pg. 1 Section 1 - Public Outreach ........................................................................pg. 3 Section 2 - Pedestrian Infrastructure.........................................................pg. 11 Section 3 - Parks Assessment ...................................................................pg. 23 Section 4 - Public Transit Assessment ......................................................pg. 45 Section 5 - Snow Clearance........................................................................pg. 59 Section 6 - Funding & CDBG ......................................................................pg. 63 Appendix .................................................................................................................................. pg. 69 6 Maps Tables 1.1 - Adams Comments ...................................................................pg. 6 Table 1.1 - Outreach Response Categories ....................................pg. 5 1.2 - Woodruff Comments ...............................................................pg. 7 Table 4.1 - Bus Stop Improvements ................................................pg. 53 1.3 - Ellis Comments .......................................................................pg. 8 Table 5.1 - Snow Clearance Findings ..............................................pg. 62 1.4 - Bridger Comments ..................................................................pg. 9 2.1 - Infrastructure Deficiencies .......................................................pg. 13 2.2 - Neighborhood Assets ..............................................................pg. 14 2.3 - Assets Overlay Process ..........................................................pg. 15 2.4 - Neighborhood Asset Overlay...................................................pg. 15 2.5 - Neighborhood Asset Overlay and Infrastructure Priority .........pg. 16 2.6 - Priority Areas - Bridger ............................................................pg. 17 2.7 - Priority Areas - Adams .............................................................pg. 18 2.8 - Priority Areas - Hillcrest ...........................................................pg. 19 2.9 - Priority Areas - Wilson .............................................................pg. 20 2.10 - Priority Areas - Woodruff .......................................................pg. 21 2.11 - Priority Areas - Ellis ...............................................................pg. 22 3.1 - Merlin Olsen Park Assessment ...............................................pg. 26 3.2 - Merlin Olsen Park Recommendations .....................................pg. 27 3.3 - Willow Park Assessment .........................................................pg. 28 3.4 - Willow Park Recommendations...............................................pg. 29 3.5 - West Willow Park Assessment ................................................pg. 30 3.6 - West Willow Park Recommendations .....................................pg. 31 3.7 - Bridger Park Assessment ........................................................pg. 32 3.8 - Bridger Park Recommendations .............................................pg. 33 3.9 - River Hollow Park Assessment ...............................................pg. 34 3.10 - River Hollow Park Recommendations ...................................pg. 35 3.11 - Adams Park Assessment .......................................................pg. 36 3.12 - Adams Park Recommendations ............................................pg. 37 3.13 - Hyrum Gibbons Park Assessment.........................................pg. 38 3.14 - Hyrum Gibbons Park Recommendations ..............................pg. 39 3.15 - Bridgerland Park Assessment ...............................................pg. 40 3.16 - Bridgerland Park Recommendations.....................................pg. 41 3.17 - Lundstrom Park Assessment.................................................pg. 42 3.18 - Bridgerland Park Recommendations.....................................pg. 43 4.1 - Bus Stop Priority Ranking .......................................................pg. 47 4.2 - Bus Stop Accessibility Assessment .........................................pg. 48 4.3 - Bus Stop Snow Clearance ......................................................pg. 49 4.4 - Bus Stop Feature Barrier Type ................................................pg. 51 6.1 - CDBG Eligibility - Street Improvements ..................................pg. 64 6.2 - Adjacent Development Level ...................................................pg. 65 6.3 - CDBG Eligibility - Parks...........................................................pg. 66 6.4 - CDBG Eligibility - Bus Stops ...................................................pg. 67 INTRODUCTION CDBG Access and Mobility Plan (AMP) The goal of the AMP is to inventory and prioritize deficiencies of this assessment is target areas and projects in each in public infrastructure and facilities that pose an impediment neighborhood for pedestrian infrastructure investment. to access and mobility for people with disabilities. This plan will make neighborhood-centric connections that Parks Assessment increase access for people with disabilities to transit, parks, This section is an inventory and analysis of mobility barriers services, and other public venues and spaces by prioritizing in Logan City parks. The assessment was conducted by improvements based on user feedback and infrastructure Logan City staff. The outcome of this assessment identifies analysis. projects that can improve park mobility. Major neighborhood parks are included in the section. Assessments for all public The AMP has been developed with clear principles in mind. parks are included in the appendix. These principles are: Public Transit Assessment • Improve access at the neighborhood level for people This section reviews all bus stops in Logan to identify mobility with disabilities. barriers. Bus stops were assessed for both feature barriers, such as missing sidewalk, and for snow clearance. The • Identify improvements that will create a network of outcome of this assessment identifies both bus stop feature connectivity. improvements and snow clearance improvements. • Prioritize improvements to maximize the efficiency of Corner Snow Clearance Assessment limited resources available for investment. This section assesses a selection of ADA corners in all neighborhoods for snow clearance compliance. The outcome As the plan is broad in scope, it has been broken into several of this assessment identifies strategies to improve snow sections that cover public outreach, infrastructure studies, clearance along pedestrian corridors. and funding options. Funding and CDBG The sections of the plan are: This section discusses funding options for physical improvements recommended in the plan. CDBG funding is Public Outreach highlighted as an important component for implementing this This section discusses public participation received during plan. the planning process. The input provided was used to identify underlying trends in mobility issues in Logan and identify potential barriers. Pedestrian Infrastructure This section is an inventory and analysis of sidewalk and corners in Logan. The assessment primarily utilizes GIS data. The analysis focuses on identifying deficiencies in pedestrian infrastructure as they relate to neighborhood assets, such as schools, parks, transit, and commercial nodes. The outcome 1 INTRODUCTION Access and Mobility Planning Housing Choice identified a lack of accessible housing as an The Bear River Coordinated Human Service Transportation The AMP is designed as a specific plan that is supplemental impediment to people with disabilities. While this plan does Plan, created by the Bear River Regional Access and Mobility and complementary to other planning documents for Logan not directly address housing improvements to alleviate this Council, works to sustain and improve transportation access City and the region. The plans summarized below contain Fair Housing impediment, it does address the impediment and mobility for underserved populations in the region. This supportive planning for access and mobility in Logan. by providing an investment road map to alleviate physical plan proposes that coordinated efforts between human barriers in neighborhoods that may have prohibited an service agencies can fill the gap created by deficiencies in individuals with disabilities from fully participating in the public transportation and infrastructure to meet the needs Logan City General Plan community. Eliminating those barriers will open more housing of older adults, low-income individuals, and people with The Logan City General Plan is built around “Quality Growth options for people with disabilities. disabilities who reside
Recommended publications
  • Cache Valley
    C a c h e V a l l e y V i s i t o r s B u r e a u Cache Valley HERITAGE DRIVING TOUR CACHE VALLEY driving tour Cache Valley extends more than 50 miles into the states of Utah and Idaho. Beautifully nestled among the steep slopes of the Bear River and Wellsville mountain ranges, the valley averages 4500 feet in elevation and is four to twelve miles in width. The surrounding high mountains, clear streams and productive soil all combine to make it a valley rich in the blessings of nature. Cache Valley was the scene of many events important in the settling of the American West. It was here that mountain Indian tribes found ample hunting ground for game, that rugged mountain men splashed through streams in search of beaver, and where Mormon pioneers built new homes in the wilderness of the American frontier. For centuries before the mountain men and the Mormons came to Cache Valley, Native Americans hunted, fished and gathered seeds from the grass that was plentiful upon the valley floor. These Native Americans, the Northwestern Shoshone, named the valley Seuhubeogoi, “Willow River,” and established both winter and summer camps along the major rivers. As nomadic hunters and gatherers they followed centuries-old migratory patterns in search of food. Famous Northwestern Shoshone leaders were Sagwitch, Bear Hunter, Pocatello, Pahvants, and Sanpitch. Mountain men in search of beaver were the first white visitors to Cache Valley. During the years of the Rocky Mountain fur General Merchandise Store, built 1879 Cover photo: American West Heritage Center All photos: USU Special Collections 2 trade, the valley was a crossroad and campground for almost every mountain man who ever fought, trapped or traded in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior Miscellaneous Field Studies United States Geological Survey Map Mf-1566-A Pamphlet
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MISCELLANEOUS FIELD STUDIES UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MAP MF-1566-A PAMPHLET MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL OF MOUNT NAOMI ROADLESS AREA, CACHE COUNTY, UTAH, AND FRANKLIN COUNTY, IDAHO By James H. Dover, U.S. Geological Survey and Philip R. Bigsby, U.S. Bureau of Mines STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Under the provisions of the Wilderness Act (Public Law 88-577, September 3, 1964) and related acts, the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines have been conducting mineral surveys of wilderness and primitive areas. Areas officially designated as "wilderness," "wild," or "canoe" when the act was passed were incorporated into the National Wilderness Preservation System, and some of them are presently being studied. The act provided that areas under consideration for wilderness designation should be studied for suitability for incorporation into the Wilderness System. The mineral surveys constitute one aspect of the suitability studies. The act directs that the results of such surveys are to be made available to the public and be submitted to the President and the Congress. This report discusses the results of a mineral survey of the Mount Naomi Roadless Area (04758), Wasatch and Caribou National Forests, Cache County, Utah, and Franklin County, Idaho. Mount Naomi Roadless Area was classified as a further planning area during the Second Roadless Area Review and Evaluation (RARE n)i by the U.S. Forest Service, January 1979. MINERAL RESOURCE POTENTIAL SUMMARY STATEMENT Geological, geophysical, and geochemical investigations have been conducted to assess the mineral resource potential of the Mount Naomi Roadless Area (hereafter referred to as "study area"), northeastern Utah and southeastern Idaho.
    [Show full text]
  • Logan Canyon
    C A C H E V A L L E Y / B E A R L A K E Guide to the LOGAN CANYON NATIONAL SCENIC BYWAY 1 explorelogan.com C A C H E V A L L E Y / B E A R L A K E 31 SITES AND STOPS TABLE OF CONTENTS Site 1 Logan Ranger District 4 31 Site 2 Canyon Entrance 6 Site 3 Stokes Nature Center / River Trail 7 hether you travel by car, bicycle or on foot, a Site 4 Logan City Power Plant / Second Dam 8 Wjourney on the Logan Canyon National Scenic Site 5 Bridger Campground 9 Byway through the Wasatch-Cache National Forest Site 6 Spring Hollow / Third Dam 9 Site 7 Dewitt Picnic Area 10 offers an abundance of breathtaking natural beauty, Site 8 Wind Caves Trailhead 11 diverse recreational opportunities, and fascinating Site 9 Guinavah-Malibu 12 history. This journey can calm your heart, lift your Site 10 Card Picnic Area 13 Site 11 Chokecherry Picnic Area 13 spirit, and create wonderful memories. Located Site 12 Preston Valley Campground 14 approximately 90 miles north of Salt Lake City, this Site 13 Right Hand Fork / winding stretch of U.S. Hwy. 89 runs from the city of Lodge Campground 15 Site 14 Wood Camp / Jardine Juniper 16 Logan in beautiful Cache Valley to Garden City on Site 15 Logan Cave 17 the shores of the brilliant azure-blue waters of Bear Site 16 The Dugway 18 Lake. It passes through colorful fields of wildflowers, Site 17 Blind Hollow Trailhead 19 Site 18 Temple Fork / Old Ephraim’s Grave 19 between vertical limestone cliffs, and along rolling Site 19 Ricks Spring 21 streams brimming with trout.
    [Show full text]
  • Feasibility Study at Neighborhood Council Meetings and Logan Municipal Council Meetings
    1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................. 2 2. Focus of This Study .................................................................................................................. 2 3. Agency Coordination and Public Outreach ............................................................................. 3 4. Plan Goals and Objectives ....................................................................................................... 4 5. Planning Process ...................................................................................................................... 5 6. Developing Planning Cost Estimates ..................................................................................... 11 7. Impacts Associated with Implementation of Couplet Scenarios .......................................... 12 8. Public Involvement ................................................................................................................ 24 9. Summary ................................................................................................................................ 24 10. Next Steps .............................................................................................................................. 24 1 1. Introduction Logan City has a large residential population and serves as the main shopping, recreation and employment center of the region. Logan City has a limited number of north/south alternatives to Main Street.
    [Show full text]
  • Logan Canyon Hiking Trail Guide Monique Beeley Monique Beeley Legend Trail Location Guide
    C a c h e V a l l e y V i s i t o r s B u r e a u Logan Canyon Hiking Trail Guide Monique Beeley Monique Beeley Legend Trail Location Guide WASATCH CACHE NATIONAL FOREST WILDERNESS PAVED WATER TRAILHEAD 9 r Rive ogan L White 7/8 Pine Lake Limber Tony Pine Grove 11 10 6 5 Trail 3 1 Highline Canal Right Hand Fo A-D 2/4 rk Left Hand Fork MAP 3 Legend maps not to scale for trails: 5 6 11 MAP 1 Urban Trails A-D CG Spring Hollow d Dam 3r CG Bridger 1 Mile Second Dam Second US Hwy 89 Hwy US ail ail Tr River Tr line h n l ai Hig een Canyon Canal Tr MAP 4 Gr Bon neville Sho Gateway reline Trail for trails: 7 8 9 10 N Logan Dry Canyon ovidence Canyo First Dam Pr 1900 E 1600 1600 Bonneville Shoreline Trail l ai E 1500 Tr Road Canyon Canyon MAP 2 for trails: 1 2 3 4 r Rive Logan BEFORE YOU GO EASY ACCESS URBAN TRAILS The trails on the maps are marked with their Forest There are four urban trails leaving from the First Dam Service trail numbers, for example: 047 parking lot. Trail difficulty depends on your health and physical A North. Logan Canyon to Green Canyon segment of the condition. Each trail map provides information on Bonneville Shoreline Trail. Go through the tunnel beginning and ending elevations to assist you. under the highway and follow the switchbacks up to the ancient shoreline.
    [Show full text]
  • Intermountain Trails
    Intermountain Trails USDA Forest Service—Intermountain Region August 2014 Volume 3, Issue 6 Forest In Focus: Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Forest Supervisor—Dave Whittekiend In this issue: The Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Forest in Focus 1 was recently recognized as the National Volunteer Program Unit of the Year. The Forest Supervisor Message forest hosted over 12,000 volunteers for a total of 83,196 hours of work. This volunteer Trail Stories workforce accomplishes a wide variety of work on the ground, from naturalist walks to Trail Stories 2 Notch Mountain trail construction and maintenance. Without Capitol this dedicated unpaid workforce, many of the Improvement Uinta-Wasatch-Cache Forest Supervisor, services our public expects and enjoys would Project Dave Whittekiend not exist. This incredible volunteer program is made possible by the dedicated and passionate National Public 3 Lands Day employees of the Uinta-Wasatch-Cache. Our volunteer coordinators are continuously making connections with people and projects. It could be linking Safety Tip dedicated hunters to a guzzler installation or showing a prospective Eagle Scout a Mount Naomi 4 trailhead in need of improvement. The UWC volunteer coordinators and the rest Wilderness of the employees on the forest are always willing to figure out how to include volunteers in managing this incredible resource we call the uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest. Uinta‐Wasatch‐Cache Wellsville 5 NaƟonal Forest Mountain 857 West South Jordan Parkway Wilderness South Jordan, Utah hƩp://www.fs.usda.gov/uwcnf/ High Uintas 6 Wilderness TRAIL STORIES Notch Mountain Capitol Improvement Project-see page 2 1 Notch Mountain Capitol Improvement Project Trail Stories Through the use of a State of Utah, Recreation Trails Program grant, the Heber-Kamas Ranger District has made significant improvements to the Notch Mountain Trail in the first year of the multi-year grant.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Bonneville: Geology of Southern Cache Valley, Utah
    Lake Bonneville: i Geology of Southern Cache Valley, Utah GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 257-C Lake Bonneville: Geology of Southern Cache Valley, Utah By J. STEWART WILLIAMS GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 257-C Cenozoic geology of a part of the area inundated by a late Pleistocene lake UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1962 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D.C. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract-__-_-__-____-_____--_-_-_-________-_-_____ 131 Stratigraphy—Continued Introduction.______________________________________ 131 Quaternary deposits—Continued Stratigraphy.______________________________________ 132 Landslides of Lake Bonneville and post-Lake Pre-Tertiary rocks_______-_-_-_-_-_-_.__________ 132 Bonneville age____________________________ 142 Tertiary system. _______________________________ 132 Post-Lake Bonneville deposits________________ 142 Wasatch formation__________________________ 132 Fan graveL____________________________ 142 Salt Lake formation...______________________ 133 Flood-plan alluvium_____________________ 142 Lower conglomerate unit________________ 133 Alluvial sand in natural levees of the Bear Tuff unit.---_-----_---------------_--_ 134 River----.-----------.-------------- 142 Upper conglomerate and sandstone unit___ 134 Slope wash___________________________ 143 Quaternary deposits.._____---____-__--_____-___- 135 Eolian
    [Show full text]
  • Bear River Heritage Area Book
    Bear River heritage area Idaho Utah — Julie Hollist Golden Cache Bear Lake Pioneer Spike Valley Country Trails Blessed by Water Worked by Hand The Bear River Heritage Area — Blessed by Water, Worked by Hand fur trade, sixteen rendezvous were held—four in The Bear River those established by more recent immigrants, like Welcome to the Bear what is now the Bear River Heritage Area, and the The head of the Bear River in the Uinta people from Japan, Mexico, Vietnam and more. other twelve within 65 to 200 miles. Cache Valley, Mountains is only about 90 miles from where it Look for cultural markers on the landscape, River Heritage Area! which straddles the Utah-Idaho border (and is ends at the Great Salt Lake to the west. However, like town welcome signs, historic barns and It sits in a dry part of North America, home to Logan, Utah, and Preston, Idaho, among the river makes a large, 500-mile loop through hay stacking machines, clusters of evergreen yet this watershed of the Bear River is others), was named for the mountain man practice three states, providing water, habitat for birds, fish, trees around old cemeteries and town squares of storing (caching) their pelts there. and other animals, irrigation for agriculture and that often contain a church building (like the greener than its surroundings, offering hydroelectric power for homes and businesses. tabernacles in Paris, Idaho; and Brigham City, a hospitable home to wildlife and people Nineteenth Century Immigration Logan, and Wellsville, Utah, and the old Oneida alike. Early Shoshone and Ute Indians, The Oregon Trail brought thousands Reading the Landscape Stake Academy in Preston, Idaho).
    [Show full text]
  • LOGAN RIVER RESTORATION Conservation Action Plan May 2016
    LOGAN RIVER RESTORATION Conservation Action Plan May 2016 The Logan River, an integral part of the greater Bear River ecosystem, originates within the Bear River Mountains in the headwaters of Logan Canyon and terminates at its confluence with the Little Bear River in Cutler Reservoir. The river is an asset to residents of Logan City and Cache County and has historically supported many beneficial uses. The Logan River was an important resource for Native Americans and pioneers, and it remains valuable today. Cache Valley citizens are attracted to the river and enjoy the aesthetics, recreational values, and wildlife resources associated with this high- quality river, which supports fish, wildlife, and many plant species unique to riparian and wetland habitats. The Logan River also provides water for irrigation, municipal water supply, and hydroelectricity. To protect the Logan River from degradation and the growing threats of floodplain development, a Conservation Action Plan (CAP) has been developed for the portions of the Logan River from First Dam (at the mouth of Logan Canyon) through Cache Valley to the confluence with the Little Bear River at Cutler Reservoir (Figure 1). The development of a short- and long-range vision for the river is needed to coordinate and prioritize conservation efforts and ensure a sustainable river system for future generations. Stakeholder groups representing residential, commercial, recreational, and agricultural interests have participated in the development of this CAP. The CAP is a dynamic set of objectives that can be revised as needed when new threats or conservation solutions are identified. The Logan River CAP uses The Nature Conservancy’s science- based planning framework (further described at https://www.conservatio ngateway.org/Files/Page s/action-planning-cap- handb.aspx) to create a system-wide assessment and plan for the river.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Areas on the Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National
    Wilderness Areas On The Uinta‐Wasatch‐Cache National Forests “Wilderness is the land that was wild land beyond the frontier...land that shaped the growth of our nation and the character of its people. Wilderness is the land that is rare, wild places where one can retreat from civilization, reconnect with the Earth, and find healing, meaning and significance.” The United States was the first country to define and create designated wilderness areas. In 1964 the Wilderness Act was passed in congress. The Act describes wilderness as the following: "...lands designated for preservation and protection in their natural condition..." Section 2(a) "...an area where the earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man..." Section 2(c) "...an area of undeveloped Federal land retaining its primeval character and influence, without permanent improvement or human habitation..." Section 2(c) "...generally appears to have been affected primarily by the forces of nature, with the imprint of man's work substantially unnoticeable..." Section 2(c) "...has outstanding opportunities for solitude or a primitive and unconfined type of recreation..." Section 2(c) "...shall be devoted to the public purposes of recreation, scenic, scientific, educational, conservation and historic use." Section 4(b) Within the Uinta‐Wasatch‐Cache National Forest there are 9 designated wilderness areas. These areas include: Mount Naomi Wilderness, Wellsville Mountain Wilderness, Mount Olympus Wilderness, Twin Peaks Wilderness, Lone Peak Wilderness, Mount Timpanogos Wilderness, Mount Nebo Wilderness, Deseret Peak Wilderness and the High Uinta Wilderness. Each of these areas offer unique wilderness opportunities and experiences. The Mount Naomi Wilderness was designated in 1984 and includes 44,523 acres.
    [Show full text]
  • Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Is Where Civilization Meets the “Wild.” Metropolitan Areas and Get to Know Us
    inta-Wasatch-Cache NATIONAL FOREST U VISITOR GUIDE The Forest Next Door Logan River (© Mike Norton) Nebo Loop Road (© Willie Holdman) What’s Inside he Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest is where civilization meets the “wild.” Metropolitan areas and Get»to»Know»Us»......................... 2 Tcommunities bordering the forest make up some of the Special»Places»...........................3 fastest growing areas in the Intermountain West. Quick, Scenic»Byways»&»Backways»......4 convenient access is available to forest visitors year-round, Wilderness».................................6 Activities».................................... 8 making the Uinta-Wasatch-Cache an intensely used Hiking».......................................»10 destination spanning backyard to backcountry. Roads and Winter»Recreation....................»12 trails lead visitors to natural settings and spectacular vistas Flora»&»Fauna»..........................»14 with fresh water and clean air. Know»Before»You»Go.................16 Campgrounds»&»Picnic»Areas...18 In winter, the “Greatest Snow on Fast Forest Facts Maps»........................................»24 Earth” draws people from around Contact»Information»................»28 »» Size:»2.1»million»acres,»from» the world. desert»to»high»mountain»peaks.» »» The»oldest»exposed»rocks»in»Utah» can»be»seen»in»outcrops»near»the» mouth»of»Farmington»Canyon.» orest lands have sustained local communities »» The»Jardine»Juniper»tree»is»over» for thousands of years. We recognize our role in 1,500»years»old»and»is»one»of»the» F finding balance and maintaining relevance, while oldest»living»trees»in»the»Rocky» Mountains. providing sustainable recreation for a diverse and growing population. This Visitor Guide provides the information you need to make the most of your Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest experience. G et to Know Us History s “The Forest Next Door,” the Uinta-Wasatch- y the1890s many of the range and timber resources of ACache National Forest has long been sought after for its Bthe Uinta and Wasatch Mountains were seriously depleted.
    [Show full text]
  • Seventh Annual Report
    SEVENTH ANNUAL REPORT BEAR RIVER COMMISSION For the Report Year October I, 1963 to September 30, 1964 LOGAN, UTAH IN MEMORIAM MELVIN LAURIDSEN Commissioner from Idaho Bear River Compact Commission, 1951-58 Bear River Commission, 1958-64 BEAR RIVER COMMISSION P. 0.BOX 413 LOGAN, UTAH April 1 ,1965 Mr. President: Submitted herewith is the Seventh Annual Report of the Bear River Commission, as required by Article 111 D 2 of the Bear River Compact. A copy of the report is being transmitted to the Governor of each signatory State to the Bear River Compact. Very truly yours, Wallace N. Jibson Assistact Secretary The President The White House Washington, D. C. Letter of Transmittal Budget and Fiscal Disbursements Stream-Gaging Progam Streamflow Distribution Central Division Lower Division Appendix A-Auditor's Report Appendix B-Gaging-Station Records ...... ...~ 38-63 ILLUSTRATIONS AND TABLES Frontispiece, Map of Rear River Basin 4-5 Figure 1. Comparative Flow at Three Gaging Stations ............ 13 Figure 2-3. Water Supply Hydrographs 14-15 Figure 4. Bear Lake Bar Graph .................................................. 17 Figure 5. Bear Lake Hydrograph 18 Figure 6-7. Upper Division Hydrographs ...................................... 23-24 Figure 8. Woodruff Narrows Reservoir Hydrograph ................ 25 Figure 9-10. Central Division Hydrographs .................................... 26-27 Tables 1-5. Central Division Tabulation of Diversions ................ 28-32 SEVENTH ANNUAL REPORT OF THE BEAR RIVER COMMISSION April 1, 1965 INTRODUCTION The Bear River Compact determines the rights and obligations of the signatory States of Wyoming, Idaho, and Utah with respect to the waters of Bear River. Federal consent to the Compact was given by the Congress and signed by the President, March 17, 1958.
    [Show full text]