Short Stature in Childhood — Challenges and Choices

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Short Stature in Childhood — Challenges and Choices T h e new england journal o f medicine clinical practice Short Stature in Childhood — Challenges and Choices David B. Allen, M.D., and Leona Cuttler, M.D. This Journal feature begins with a case vignette highlighting a common clinical problem. Evidence supporting various strategies is then presented, followed by a review of formal guidelines, when they exist. The article ends with the authors’ clinical recommendations. From the Division of Pediatric Endocri- A family seeks evaluation and treatment of short stature in their 11.5-year-old son. He nology and Diabetes, American Family previously was in the 3rd percentile for height, but his growth rate has slowed during Children’s Hospital, University of Wis- consin School of Medicine and Public the past 2 years, and his height is now just below the 1st percentile (Fig. 1). His moth- Health, Madison (D.B.A.); and the Center er is 5 ft 0 in. (152 cm), and his father is 5 ft 6 in. (167 cm). The child’s size at birth was for Child Health and Policy and the Divi- normal. His medical history and a review of systems are unremarkable. His physical sion of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Rainbow Babies and Children’s Hospital, examination is normal and shows prepubertal development. The complete blood count, Case Western Reserve School of Medi- erythrocyte sedimentation rate, thyrotropin, tissue transglutaminase antibody, and cine, Cleveland (L.C.). Address reprint insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) levels and growth hormone levels after provoca- requests to Dr. Allen at the University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public tive testing are normal. His skeletal maturation (bone age) is approximately 9 years, Health, H4/448 CSC, Dept. of Pediatrics, and his predicted adult height is 5 ft 5 in. (165 cm) plus or minus 1.3 in. (3.3 cm).1 600 Highland Ave., Madison, WI 53792- How should his condition be managed? 4108, or at [email protected]. N Engl J Med 2013;368:1220-8. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMcp1213178 The Clinical Problem Copyright © 2013 Massachusetts Medical Society. Short stature in childhood is a very common reason for referral to pediatric endo- crinologists. Although evaluation for growth-inhibiting disorders is often indicat- ed, most children with short stature are essentially healthy. Testing for growth hormone secretion often does not clearly distinguish isolated growth hormone defi- ciency from idiopathic short stature. Treatment with recombinant human growth hormone can increase the adult height of children with idiopathic short stature by An audio version 1.2 to 2.8 in. (3.0 to 7.1 cm), with wide variation in the incremental gain.2-5 In 2003, of this article is the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved human growth hormone treat- available at NEJM.org ment for children with idiopathic short stature and height below the 1st percentile (−2.25 SD). Accordingly, at least 500,000 children in the United States (i.e., approxi- mately 1% of children 4 to 13 years of age)6 were considered to have a condition for which there is available, effective, and expensive treatment (approximately $10,000 to $60,000 per patient per year).3 The FDA approval gave rise to controversies, uncertain- ties, and inconsistencies regarding therapeutic options that often overshadow the problem of short stature itself. Strategies and Evidence Evaluation Clinicians who evaluate children with short stature must consider many potential causes (Fig. 2).7 Although evaluation is needed to rule out disorders such as true growth hormone deficiency and hypothyroidism, the Turner syndrome, and chronic diseases, the majority of children with short stature ultimately receive a diagnosis of 1220 n engl j med 368;13 nejm.org march 28, 2013 The New England Journal of Medicine Downloaded from nejm.org at SUNY STONY BROOK on April 4, 2013. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright © 2013 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. clinical practice key Clinical points short stature in childhood • Thorough evaluation of short stature in childhood is warranted when the child’s height deficit is severe (<1st percentile for age), the growth rate is abnormally slow (<10th percentile for bone age), the predicted height differs significantly from midparental height, or the body proportions are abnormal. • Human growth hormone treatment increases the growth rate, modestly increases adult height, and has been shown to be safe thus far, but it is expensive and the long-term risk:benefit ratio for essen- tially healthy children remains uncertain. • Observation and reassurance are reasonable for most children with short stature, given the lack of good evidence linking short stature with psychological harm or showing a long-term psychosocial benefit with growth-enhancing therapy. • Low-dose oral oxandrolone is an effective and relatively inexpensive option for growth acceleration, but it has not been shown to increase adult height. idiopathic short stature due to physiological vari- is disproportionate to height gain) may suggest a ants such as familial short stature, constitutional nutritional disturbance or chronic disease. Al- delay of growth and puberty (CDGP), or both. In though children with true growth hormone de- general, a growth rate that is abnormally slow for ficiency may have classic physical findings such chronologic and bone age should prompt a thor- as increased subcutaneous fat, most present ough examination and possible laboratory evalu- primarily with attenuated growth from infancy ation. Growth patterns in a child that differ mark- (congenital growth hormone deficiency) or later edly from the midparental height (estimated by (acquired growth hormone deficiency). averaging the two parents’ sex-specific height per- Familial short stature, CDGP, or both are the centiles) are also of concern, although these esti- most common causes of short stature. However, mates are less accurate when parental-height per- when the height for age is less than the 1st per- centiles are more disparate and are based on the centile, the growth rate is less than the 10th assumption that parental height was not itself percentile for bone age, the predicted adult diminished by a growth-restricting condition. A height1 differs significantly from the midparen- family history of late onset of puberty and the age tal height, or the body proportions are abnormal, at attainment of adult height may suggest a laboratory evaluation is warranted (Fig. 2). Screen- slowed “tempo” of growth and development (as ing laboratory studies target potential hormonal in CDGP). A history of intrauterine growth re- disorders (e.g., with measurement of thyroid hor- striction should also be assessed, since about mone levels), renal disorders (with measurement 15% of children with this condition continue to of electrolyte and creatinine levels), inflamma- have short stature throughout life.7 tory and immune disorders (with measurement of Physical examination should assess for the fol- the erythrocyte sedimentation rate and tests for lowing: abnormal body proportions (e.g., an in- tissue transglutaminase antibodies), and hema- creased ratio of the upper to lower body segment, tologic disorders (with a complete blood count). calculated by comparing the height in a sitting Genetic testing for specific syndromes may be position with the height in a standing position, indicated by physical findings or simply by a which suggests bone dysplasia or the Turner syn- growth pattern and height projection that differ drome); characteristics that suggest genetic con- significantly from those in other members of ditions (e.g., lymphedema or a low posterior the family. Assessment of the growth hormone– hairline, both of which occur in the Turner syn- IGF-I axis begins with measurement of the se- drome, or a murmur related to pulmonic-valve rum IGF-I level, but since levels increase rapidly stenosis, which occurs in the Noonan syndrome); with the onset of puberty, results must be inter- or findings (e.g., goiter) that suggest hypothy- preted relative to bone age rather than to chron- roidism. Poor weight gain (i.e., weight gain that ologic age. A normal IGF-I level for bone age n engl j med 368;13 nejm.org march 28, 2013 1221 The New England Journal of Medicine Downloaded from nejm.org at SUNY STONY BROOK on April 4, 2013. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright © 2013 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. T h e new england journal o f medicine be helpful in such children, since abnormal find- cm in. in. ings such as diminished pituitary size or ectopic 200 78 78 195 Stature-for-Age Percentiles: or absent posterior pituitary enhancement further 76 76 11 190 Boys, 2–20 Yr 97th support this diagnosis. In the large majority of 74 95th 74 185 90th 72 72 short children, however, the history and examina- 180 75th 70 70 tion are unrevealing, and tests yield equivocal or 175 50th 68 68 170 25th normal results. These children are generally con- 66 10th 66 165 5th sidered to have short stature that is not related to 64 3rd 64 160 62 62 growth hormone deficiency — idiopathic short 155 60 60 stature due to physiological variants (i.e., famil- 150 58 58 145 ial short stature, CDGP, or both). Familial short 56 56 140 stature and CDGP are commonly included under 54 54 135 the umbrella of idiopathic short stature.12 Height 52 52 130 50 125 50 Management 120 48 48 115 46 46 Children with short stature that is not related to 110 44 44 growth hormone deficiency may receive mark- 105 42 42 40 40 edly different recommendations for management 100 11.5-yr-old boy 38 38 options that vary in complexity and costs and for 95 Height, 0.9th percentile 90 36 Bone age, approximately 9 yr 36 which the relative benefits and risks are uncer- 85 34 Predicted adult height, 5 ft 5 in.
Recommended publications
  • Causes of Short Stature Author Alan D Rogol, MD, Phd Section Editors
    Causes of short stature Author Alan D Rogol, MD, PhD Section Editors Peter J Snyder, MD Mitchell Geffner, MD Deputy Editor Alison G Hoppin, MD Contributor disclosures All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review process is complete. Literature review current through: Mar 2016. | This topic last updated: Aug 13, 2015. INTRODUCTION — Short stature is a term applied to a child whose height is 2 standard deviations (SD) or more below the mean for children of that sex and chronologic age (and ideally of the same racial-ethnic group). This corresponds to a height that is below the 2.3rd percentile. Short stature may be either a variant of normal growth or caused by a disease. The most common causes of short stature beyond the first year or two of life are familial (genetic) short stature and delayed (constitutional) growth, which are normal non-pathologic variants of growth. The goal of the evaluation of a child with short stature is to identify the subset of children with pathologic causes (such as Turner syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease or other underlying systemic disease, or growth hormone deficiency). The evaluation also assesses the severity of the short stature and likely growth trajectory, to facilitate decisions about intervention, if appropriate. This topic will review the main causes of short stature. The diagnostic approach to children with short stature is discussed separately. (See "Diagnostic approach to children and adolescents with short stature".) NORMAL VARIANTS OF GROWTH Familial short stature — Familial or genetic short stature is most often a normal variant, termed familial or genetic short stature (figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts from the 9Th Biennial Scientific Meeting of The
    International Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology 2017, 2017(Suppl 1):15 DOI 10.1186/s13633-017-0054-x MEETING ABSTRACTS Open Access Abstracts from the 9th Biennial Scientific Meeting of the Asia Pacific Paediatric Endocrine Society (APPES) and the 50th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society for Pediatric Endocrinology (JSPE) Tokyo, Japan. 17-20 November 2016 Published: 28 Dec 2017 PS1 Heritable forms of primary bone fragility in children typically lead to Fat fate and disease - from science to global policy a clinical diagnosis of either osteogenesis imperfecta (OI) or juvenile Peter Gluckman osteoporosis (JO). OI is usually caused by dominant mutations affect- Office of Chief Science Advsor to the Prime Minister ing one of the two genes that code for two collagen type I, but a re- International Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology 2017, 2017(Suppl 1):PS1 cessive form of OI is present in 5-10% of individuals with a clinical diagnosis of OI. Most of the involved genes code for proteins that Attempts to deal with the obesity epidemic based solely on adult be- play a role in the processing of collagen type I protein (BMP1, havioural change have been rather disappointing. Indeed the evidence CREB3L1, CRTAP, LEPRE1, P4HB, PPIB, FKBP10, PLOD2, SERPINF1, that biological, developmental and contextual factors are operating SERPINH1, SEC24D, SPARC, from the earliest stages in development and indeed across generations TMEM38B), or interfere with osteoblast function (SP7, WNT1). Specific is compelling. The marked individual differences in the sensitivity to the phenotypes are caused by mutations in SERPINF1 (recessive OI type obesogenic environment need to be understood at both the individual VI), P4HB (Cole-Carpenter syndrome) and SEC24D (‘Cole-Carpenter and population level.
    [Show full text]
  • Program Nr: 1 from the 2004 ASHG Annual Meeting Mutations in A
    Program Nr: 1 from the 2004 ASHG Annual Meeting Mutations in a novel member of the chromodomain gene family cause CHARGE syndrome. L.E.L.M. Vissers1, C.M.A. van Ravenswaaij1, R. Admiraal2, J.A. Hurst3, B.B.A. de Vries1, I.M. Janssen1, W.A. van der Vliet1, E.H.L.P.G. Huys1, P.J. de Jong4, B.C.J. Hamel1, E.F.P.M. Schoenmakers1, H.G. Brunner1, A. Geurts van Kessel1, J.A. Veltman1. 1) Dept Human Genetics, UMC Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; 2) Dept Otorhinolaryngology, UMC Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands; 3) Dept Clinical Genetics, The Churchill Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom; 4) Children's Hospital Oakland Research Institute, BACPAC Resources, Oakland, CA. CHARGE association denotes the non-random occurrence of ocular coloboma, heart defects, choanal atresia, retarded growth and development, genital hypoplasia, ear anomalies and deafness (OMIM #214800). Almost all patients with CHARGE association are sporadic and its cause was unknown. We and others hypothesized that CHARGE association is due to a genomic microdeletion or to a mutation in a gene affecting early embryonic development. In this study array- based comparative genomic hybridization (array CGH) was used to screen patients with CHARGE association for submicroscopic DNA copy number alterations. De novo overlapping microdeletions in 8q12 were identified in two patients on a genome-wide 1 Mb resolution BAC array. A 2.3 Mb region of deletion overlap was defined using a tiling resolution chromosome 8 microarray. Sequence analysis of genes residing within this critical region revealed mutations in the CHD7 gene in 10 of the 17 CHARGE patients without microdeletions, including 7 heterozygous stop-codon mutations.
    [Show full text]
  • Turner Syndrome (TS) Is a Genetic Disease That Affects About Physical Signs of TS May Include: 1 in Every 2,500 Female Live Births
    Notes: A Guide for Caregivers For easily accessible answers, education, and support, visit Nutropin.com or call 1-866-NUTROPIN (1-866-688-7674). 18 19 of patients with Your healthcare team is your primary source Turner Syndrome of information about your child’s treatment. Please see the accompanying full Prescribing Information, including Instructions for Use, and additional Important Safety Information througout and on pages 16-18. Models used for illustrative purposes only. Nutropin, Nutropin AQ, and NuSpin are registered trademarks, Nutropin GPS is a trademark, and NuAccess is a service mark of Genentech, Inc. © 2020 Genentech USA, Inc., 1 DNA Way, So. San Francisco, CA 94080 M-US-00005837(v1.0) 06/20 FPO Understanding Turner Syndrome What is Turner Syndrome? Turner Syndrome (TS) is a genetic disease that affects about Physical signs of TS may include: 1 in every 2,500 female live births. TS occurs when one • Short stature of a girl’s two X chromosomes is absent or incomplete. • Webbing of the neck Chromosomes are found in all cells of the human body. They contain the genes that determine the characteristics of a • Low-set, rotated ears person such as the color of hair or eyes. Every person has • Arms that turn out slightly at the elbows 22 pairs of chromosomes containing these characteristics, • Low hairline at the back of the head and one pair of sex chromosomes. • A high, arched palate in the mouth Normally cells in a female’s body contain two “X” chromosomes Biological signs of TS may include: (Fig. 1). • Underdevelopment of the ovaries In girls with TS, part or • Not reaching sexual maturity or starting all of one X chromosome a menstrual period (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Dosing of Growth Hormone in Children with Growth Hormone Deficiency: How Physiologic?
    Current Dosing of Growth Hormone in Children With Growth Hormone Deficiency: How Physiologic? Margaret H. MacGillivray, MD*; Sandra L. Blethen, MD, PhD‡; John G. Buchlis, MD*; Richard R. Clopper, ScD*; David E. Sandberg, PhD*; and Thomas A. Conboy, MS* ABSTRACT. The current doses of recombinant growth ARE THE APPROVED RECOMBINANT HUMAN GH hormone (rGH) are two to three times those used in the DOSING REGIMENS PHYSIOLOGIC? pituitary growth hormone era. These rGH doses (0.025 to A standard method for determining whether hor- 0.043 mg/kg/d) are similar to or moderately greater than mone replacement is physiologic is to compare the the physiologic requirements. Growth velocity and dose of hormone administered with the amount of height gains have been shown to be greater with 0.05 that hormone produced daily in healthy persons. For mg/kg/d of rGH than with 0.025 mg/kg/d. Larger doses of human GH, this is not an easy task because of its GH and early initiation of treatment result in greater short half-life, multicompartmental distribution, and heights at the onset of puberty and greater adult heights. Earlier onset of puberty and more rapid maturation, as episodic pulsatile pattern of secretion. In addition, indicated by bone age, were not observed in children GH has a variable secretion profile that is influenced who were given 0.18 to 0.3 mg/kg/wk of rGH. The fre- by age, diurnal rhythm, sleep, stress, nutrition, body quency of adverse events is very low, but diligent sur- weight, and sex hormones. One approach to calcu- veillance of all children who are treated with rGH is lating daily levels of endogenously produced GH essential.
    [Show full text]
  • Obese Children and Adolescents: a Risk Group for Low Vitamin B12
    ARTICLE Obese Children and Adolescents A Risk Group for Low Vitamin B12 Concentration Orit Pinhas-Hamiel, MD; Noa Doron-Panush, RD; Brian Reichman, MD; Dorit Nitzan-Kaluski, MD, MPH, RD; Shlomit Shalitin, MD; Liat Geva-Lerner, MD Objective: To assess whether overweight children and Results: Median concentration of serum B12 in normal- adolescents are at an increased risk for vitamin B12 deficiency. weight children was 530 pg/mL and in obese children, Ͻ 400 pg/mL (P .001). Low B12 concentrations were noted Design: Prospective descriptive study. in 10.4% of the obese children compared with only 2.2% Ͻ of the normal weight group (P .001). Vitamin B12 defi- Setting: Two pediatric endocrine centers in Israel. ciency was noted in 12 children, 8 (4.9%) of the obese subjects and 4 (1.8%) of the normal weight group (P=.08). Participants: Three hundred ninety-two children and After we adjusted for age and sex, obesity was associ- adolescents were divided into 2 groups as follows: the ated with a 4.3-fold risk for low serum B12, and each unit normal-weight group had body mass indexes, calcu- increase in body mass index standard deviation score re- lated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters sulted in an increased risk of 1.24 (95% confidence in- squared, under the 95th percentile (Ͻ1.645 standard de- terval, 0.99-1.56). viation scores; n=228); the obese group had body mass indexes equal to or above the 95th percentile (Ն1.645 standard deviation scores; n=164). Conclusions: Obesity in children and adolescents was associated with an increased risk of low vitamin B12 con- Intervention: We measured vitamin B12 concentra- centration.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Intergenerational Linkage Between Short Maternal Stature and Under-Five Stunting and Wasting in Bangladesh
    nutrients Article Assessing the Intergenerational Linkage between Short Maternal Stature and Under-Five Stunting and Wasting in Bangladesh Wajiha Khatun 1,*, Sabrina Rasheed 2 , Ashraful Alam 1 , Tanvir M. Huda 1 and Michael J. Dibley 1 1 Sydney School of Public Health, Edward Ford Building (A27), University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia 2 International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research Bangladesh, Mohakhali, Dhaka 1212, Bangladesh * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-88-017-4608-6278 Received: 30 May 2019; Accepted: 13 July 2019; Published: 7 August 2019 Abstract: Short maternal stature is identified as a strong predictor of offspring undernutrition in low and middle-income countries. However, there is limited information to confirm an intergenerational link between maternal and under-five undernutrition in Bangladesh. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the association between short maternal stature and offspring stunting and wasting in Bangladesh. For analysis, this study pooled the data from four rounds of Bangladesh Demographic and Health Surveys (BDHS) 2004, 2007, 2011, and 2014 that included about 28,123 singleton children aged 0–59 months born to mothers aged 15–49 years. Data on sociodemographic factors, birth history, and anthropometry were analyzed using STATA 14.2 to perform a multivariable model using ‘Modified Poisson Regression’ with step-wise backward elimination procedures. In an adjusted model, every 1 cm increase in maternal height significantly reduced the risk of stunting (relative risks (RR) = 0.960; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.957, 0.962) and wasting (RR = 0.986; 95% CI: 0.980, 0.992). The children of the short statured mothers (<145 cm) had about two times greater risk of stunting and three times the risk of severe stunting, 1.28 times the risk of wasting, and 1.43 times the risk of severe wasting (RR = 1.43; 95% CI: 1.11, 1.83) than the tall mothers ( 155 cm).
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Growth Hormone Treatment on Body Proportions and Final Height Among Small Children with X-Linked Hypophosphatemic Rickets
    Effects of Growth Hormone Treatment on Body Proportions and Final Height Among Small Children With X-Linked Hypophosphatemic Rickets Dieter Haffner, MD*; Richard Nissel, MD*; Elke Wu¨hl, MD‡; and Otto Mehls, MD‡ ABSTRACT. Background. X-linked hypophosphatemic in the PHEX gene, encoding a membrane-bound en- rickets (XLH) is characterized by rickets, disproportion- dopeptidase. PHEX is expressed in bones and teeth ate short stature, and impaired renal phosphate reabsorp- but not in kidney, and efforts are underway to elu- tion and vitamin D metabolism. Despite oral phosphate cidate how PHEX function relates to the mutant phe- and vitamin D treatment, most children with XLH dem- notype.2 onstrate reduced adult height. Pharmacologic treatment consists of oral phos- Objective. To determine the beneficial effects of re- combinant human growth hormone (rhGH) therapy on phate supplementation and calcitriol administration. body proportions and adult height among patients with Although this therapy usually leads to an improve- XLH. ment of rickets, the effects on longitudinal growth Methods. Three initially prepubertal short children are often disappointing.3 Despite adequate phos- (age, 9.4–12.9 years) with XLH were treated with rhGH phate and calcitriol treatment, most previous studies for 3.1 to 6.3 years until adult height was attained. reported reduced adult height among children with Results. rhGH treatment led to sustained increases in XLH.4–7 In addition, children with XLH present with standardized height for all children. The median adult disproportionate growth, ie, relatively preserved height was 0.9 SD (range: 0.5–1.3 SD) greater than that at trunk growth but severely diminished leg growth.8 the initiation of rhGH treatment and exceeded the pre- Previous studies demonstrated that treatment with dicted adult height by 6.2 cm (range: 5.3–9.8 cm).
    [Show full text]
  • Pathogenesis and Diagnostic Criteria for Rickets and Osteomalacia
    Endocrine Journal 2015, 62 (8), 665-671 OPINION Pathogenesis and diagnostic criteria for rickets and osteomalacia —Proposal by an expert panel supported by Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan, The Japanese Society for Bone and Mineral Research and The Japan Endocrine Society Seiji Fukumoto1), Keiichi Ozono2), Toshimi Michigami3), Masanori Minagawa4), Ryo Okazaki5), Toshitsugu Sugimoto6), Yasuhiro Takeuchi7) and Toshio Matsumoto1) 1)Fujii Memorial Institute of Medical Sciences, Tokushima University, Tokushima 770-8503, Japan 2)Department of Pediatrics, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita 565-0871, Japan 3)Department of Bone and Mineral Research, Research Institute, Osaka Medical Center for Maternal and Child Health, Izumi 594-1101, Japan 4)Department of Endocrinology, Chiba Children’s Hospital, Chiba 266-0007, Japan 5)Third Department of Medicine, Teikyo University Chiba Medical Center, Ichihara 299-0111, Japan 6)Internal Medicine 1, Shimane University Faculty of Medicine, Izumo 693-8501, Japan 7)Division of Endocrinology, Toranomon Hospital Endocrine Center, Tokyo 105-8470, Japan Abstract. Rickets and osteomalacia are diseases characterized by impaired mineralization of bone matrix. Recent investigations revealed that the causes for rickets and osteomalacia are quite variable. While these diseases can severely impair the quality of life of the affected patients, rickets and osteomalacia can be completely cured or at least respond to treatment when properly diagnosed and treated according to the specific causes. On the other hand, there are no standard criteria to diagnose rickets or osteomalacia nationally and internationally. Therefore, we summarize the definition and pathogenesis of rickets and osteomalacia, and propose the diagnostic criteria and a flowchart for the differential diagnosis of various causes for these diseases.
    [Show full text]
  • Blueprint of Pediatric Endocrinology Book
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317428263 blueprint of pediatric endocrinology book Book · January 2014 CITATIONS READS 0 27 1 author: Abdulmoein Eid Al - Agha King Abdulaziz University 148 PUBLICATIONS 123 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: HYPOPHOSPHATEMIC RICKETS, EPIDERMAL NEVUS SYNDROME WITH... View project HYPERTRIGLYCERIDAEMIA-INDUCED ACUTE PANCREATITIS IN AN INFANT: A CASE REPORT View project All content following this page was uploaded by Abdulmoein Eid Al - Agha on 09 June 2017. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. IN THE NAME OF ALLAH, THE MERCIFUL, THE MERCY-GIVING iii Blueprint in Pediatric Endocrinology Abdulmoein Eid Al-Agha, MBBS, DCH, FRCPCH Pediatric Endocrinologist King AbdulAziz University Faculty of Medicine Jeddah, Saudi Arabia © King Abdulaziz University: 1435 A.H. (2014 AD.) All rights reserved. 1st Edition: 1435 A.H. (2014 A.D.) Table of Contents Chapter 1: Basic Endocrinology Introduction…………………………………………………………………….. 3 Effects of hormones…………………………………………………………….. 3 Types of hormones……………………………………………………………… 4 Types of Hormone Receptors………………...………………………………... 5 Loss – of – function mutations………………………………………………….. 7 Gain – of – function mutations……………………………...………………….. 9 Fetal Brain Programming ………………………………………………………. 10 The endocrine system ……………………………...…………………………... 10 Hypothalamic-Pituitary Relationships………………………………………….. 10 Hypothalamic Controls………………………………………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Childhood Growth and Puberty Delay Disorders
    Childhood Growth and Puberty Delay Disorders MAJ Craig Barstow, MD ACTIVITY DISCLAIMER The material presented here is being made available by the American Academy of Family Physicians for educational purposes only. Please note that medical information is constantly changing; the information contained in this activity was accurate at the time of publication. This material is not intended to represent the only, nor necessarily best, methods or procedures appropriate for the medical situations discussed. Rather, it is intended to present an approach, view, statement, or opinion of the faculty, which may be helpful to others who face similar situations. The AAFP disclaims any and all liability for injury or other damages resulting to any individual using this material and for all claims that might arise out of the use of the techniques demonstrated therein by such individuals, whether these claims shall be asserted by a physician or any other person. Physicians may care to check specific details such as drug doses and contraindications, etc., in standard sources prior to clinical application. This material might contain recommendations/guidelines developed by other organizations. Please note that although these guidelines might be included, this does not necessarily imply the endorsement by the AAFP. 1 DISCLOSURE It is the policy of the AAFP that all individuals in a position to control content disclose any relationships with commercial interests upon nomination/invitation of participation. Disclosure documents are reviewed for potential conflict of interest (COI), and if identified, conflicts are resolved prior to confirmation of participation. Only those participants who had no conflict of interest or who agreed to an identified resolution process prior to their participation were involved in this CME activity.
    [Show full text]
  • Incorrect Unit of Measure
    We agree with Berman that there may often be honest dif- (2) make the rationale public, and (3) provide opportunities for ferences of opinion among informed experts about the value of clinicians and members to appeal policies and specific deci- new treatments. As stated in our article, our study cannot sions.1 However, even in the outstanding programs we were establish whether current practices are right or wrong. How- privileged to study in our research on policymaking, we and ever, the wide gap between the recommendations of physi- the program leaders agreed there was room for significant cians and the approvals of insurers in the cases under study improvement. underscores a potentially far-reaching problem in the US Ms Tesch’s letter on behalf of the Turner’s Syndrome Soci- health care system. We believe that insurers often make very ety provides an example of well-conceived advocacy. The fact careful and fair analyses of information in arriving at coverage that GH has been recognized by the Food and Drug Admin- decisions.1 Nevertheless, greater dialogue between insurers istration as effective in the treatment of Turner syndrome and physicians is needed to minimize discrepancies in cover- puts a burden of explanation onto an insurer who chooses not age and to provide optimal patient care. to cover it. In asking whether decisions to deny coverage re- Dr Yaes asks about consensus among physicians for the flect “reasonable cost-benefit analysis or an inappropriate de- cases studied and about the value of a treatment such as GH, nial of care,” Tesch raises the key policy question in useful which is used for a non–life-threatening condition.
    [Show full text]