DOCSLIB.ORG

Radiation Heat Transfer Analysis in Two-Phase Mixture Associated with Liquid

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Radiation Heat Transfer Analysis in Two-Phase Mixture Associated with Liquid RADIATION HEAT TRANSFER ANALYSIS IN TWO-PHASE MIXTURE ASSOCIATED WITH LIQUID METAL REACTOR ACCIDENTS Dissertation Submitted to The School of Engineering of the UNIVERSITY OF DAYTON In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Engineering By Hamza Mohamed Dayton, Ohio May 2020 RADIATION HEAT TRANSFER ANALYSIS IN TWO-PHASE MIXTURE ASSOCIATED WITH LIQUID METAL REACTOR ACCIDENTS Name: Mohammed, Hamza APPROVED BY: Jamie S. Ervin, Ph.D. Kevin P. Hallinan, Ph.D. Doctoral Committee Chair Doctoral Committee Member Chair Professor Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Andrew Chiasson, Ph.D. Elizabeth A. Ervin, Ph.D. Doctoral Committee Member Doctoral Committee Member Associate Professor Avionics Engineer Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering PE Systems Robert J. Wilkens, Ph.D., P.E. Eddy M. Rojas, Ph.D., M.A., P.E. Associate Dean for Research and Innovation Dean Professor School of Engineering School of Engineering ii ABSTRACT RADIATION HEAT TRANSFER ANALYSIS IN TWO-PHASE MIXTURE ASSOCIATED WITH LIQUID METAL REACTOR ACCIDENTS Name: Mohammed, Hamza University of Dayton Advisor: Prof. Jamie Ervin Analytical study associated with liquid-metal fast breeder reactor (LMFBR) has been investigated by using scattering and non-scattering mathematical radiation models. In the non- scattering model, the radiative transfer equation (RTE) was solved together with the continuity equations of mixture components under local thermodynamic equilibrium. A MATLAB code was used to solve these equations. This application employed a numerical integration to compute the temperature distribution within the bubble and the transient wall heat flux. First, in Rayleigh non- scattering model the particle size was 0.01 µm [6], and according to Mie theory principle, the absorption coefficient for small particle –size distribution was estimated (k = 10 m-1 was used) from reference [7] at complex refractive index of UO2 at λ = 600 µm and x = 0.0785. A MATLAB code was used to solve the radiative heat equation (RTE) in spherical coordinates. The mixture is in local thermodynamic equilibrium inside the bubble which has a black body surface boundary. The mixture in the bubble contains three components: the non-condensable gas Xenon, Uranium dioxide vapor, and fog. To simulate fuel bubble’s geometry as realistically as possible, according to experimental observation, the energy equation in a spherical coordinate system has been solved with the radiative flux heat transfer equation (RTE) to obtain the effect of fuel bubble’s geometry on the transient radiative heat flux and to predict the transient temperature iii distribution in the participating medium during a hypothetical core disruptive accident (HCDA) for liquid metal fast breeding reactor (LMFBR) for FAST. The transient temperature distribution in fog region was used to predict the amount of condensable UO2 vapor. The conclusion that can be drawn from the present study, is that the Fuel Aerosol Simulant Test (FAST) facility at Oak Ridge National Laboratory has a larger margin of safety since the bubble rising time is greater than the bubble collapse time. Second in the scattering model, the spherical harmonics method was used to solve the radiative heat transfer equation (RTE) in spherical coordinates, and the particle size was 0.07 µm [6]. The scattering coefficient of -1 UO2 particles (σ = 1.24 m ), was calculated using Mie theory at the same number of stable nuclei 3 -1 N (2.9 E15 nuclei/m ) that resulted from the absorption coefficient k = 0.082 m [7]. The P1 approximation method was used to solve the radiative transfer equation (RTE) in spherical coordinates of participating medium confined between two concentric spheres. The surfaces of the spheres are assumed to be gray, diffusely emitting and diffusely reflecting boundaries, and isothermal boundary conditions were assumed at these surfaces. Marsak’s boundary condition was used to compute the net radiative heat flux, q(τ), and the incident radiation, G(τ), to analyze and interpret CVD experiments data that were conducted in the FAST facility at ORNL [8] and Fast Flux Test Facility reactor (FFTF) at ANL. From this study, it can be concluded that there is greater margin of safety when the bubble rise time is a greater than the bubble collapse time since the bubble collapses (UO2 condenses) before it can reach the top of the vessel. In addition, the work transfer by itself can’t completely eliminate the super-heated vapor, as the bubble contains non- condensable species which hinder condensation. However, it is reasonable to assume that work transfer could decrease the amount of UO2 vapor contained in the bubble as it reached the covergas [63]. iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS My special thanks are to Prof. Jamie Ervin, my professor and advisor, for providing the time and necessary resources for the work contained herein, and for directing this dissertation and bringing it to its conclusion with patience and expertise. I would also like to express my gratitude to everyone who has helped me with this work. This includes Prof. James Menart, who helped in the radiation heat transfer area, and Salahuddin, who offered guidance in composing and reviewing several parts of this dissertation; Shahul Hameed, who helped in formatting the document and correcting the text. I also deeply appreciate my wife, children, and my friends who motivated and supported me during the development of this dissertation. v TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ........................................................................................................................................ iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... v LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................ viii LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................................. x LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND NOTATIONS ..................................................................................... xi CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 1-1 Objectives ........................................................................................................................ 10 1-2 New Contributions ........................................................................................................... 11 CHAPTER II MATHEMATICAL MODELS ........................................................................................... 12 2-1 Non-Scattering Model ...................................................................................................... 12 2-1-1 The Conservation Equations ................................................................................. 21 2-1-2 The Energy Equation ............................................................................................. 27 2-1-3 In Fog Free Region ................................................................................................ 28 2-1-4 The Wall Heat Flux in Fog Free Region ................................................................. 30 2-1-5 Transient Temperature Profile in The Fog Region ................................................ 30 2-1-6 The Wall Heat Flux ................................................................................................ 33 2-2 Scattering Model .............................................................................................................. 33 2-2-1 Radiative Analysis in Isothermal Spherical Media ................................................ 34 2-2-2 Spherical Harmonics Method ............................................................................... 36 2-2-3 Boundary Conditions ............................................................................................ 45 2-3 Boundary Work ................................................................................................................ 49 CHAPTER III RESULTS ...................................................................................................................... 52 3-1 Rayleigh Non-Scattering Model Results ........................................................................... 52 3-1-1 Compare of Current Method by Comparison With Past Work ............................. 52 3-1-2 The Wall Heat Flux ................................................................................................ 58 3-2 The Bubble Rise Time ....................................................................................................... 61 3-3 The Bubble Collapse Time ................................................................................................ 62 3-3-1 Sample Calculations of The Bubble Collapse Time ............................................... 63 3-4 Scattering Model .............................................................................................................. 66 3-4-1 Reproduced Work for W. Li and T. W. Tong [28] .................................................. 67 3-4-2 Mie Scattering Model on Sodium Experiments .................................................... 73 vi 3-4-3 Application of Current Model to Sodium Experiments ........................................ 78 3-4-4 Bubble Collapse Time ...........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Measurement of the Earth Radiation Budget at the Top of the Atmosphere—A Review
    Review Measurement of the Earth Radiation Budget at the Top of the Atmosphere—A Review Steven Dewitte * and Nicolas Clerbaux Observations Division, Royal Meteorological Institute of Belgium, 1180 Brussels, Belgium; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +32-2-3730624 Received: 25 September 2017; Accepted: 1 November 2017; Published: 7 November 2017 Abstract: The Earth Radiation Budget at the top of the atmosphere quantifies how the Earth gains energy from the Sun and loses energy to space. It is of fundamental importance for climate and climate change. In this paper, the current state-of-the-art of the satellite measurements of the Earth Radiation Budget is reviewed. Combining all available measurements, the most likely value of the Total Solar Irradiance at a solar minimum is 1362 W/m2, the most likely Earth albedo is 29.8%, and the most likely annual mean Outgoing Longwave Radiation is 238 W/m2. We highlight the link between long-term changes of the Outgoing Longwave Radiation, the strengthening of El Nino in the period 1985–1997 and the strengthening of La Nina in the period 2000–2009. Keywords: Earth Radiation Budget; Total Solar irradiance; Satellite remote sensing 1. Introduction The Earth Radiation Budget (ERB) at the top of the atmosphere describes how the Earth gains energy from the sun, and loses energy to space through reflection of solar radiation and the emission of thermal radiation. The ERB is of fundamental importance for climate since: (1) The global climate, as quantified e.g., by the global average temperature, is determined by this energy exchange.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Solar and Infrared Radiation Fluxes
    Chapter 2 Solar and Infrared Radiation Chapter overview: • Fluxes • Energy transfer • Seasonal and daily changes in radiation • Surface radiation budget Fluxes Flux (F): The transfer of a quantity per unit area per unit time (sometimes called flux density). A flux can be thought of as the inflow or outflow of a quantity through the side of a fixed volume. Fluxes can occur in all three directions - Fx, Fy, and Fz What is the convention for the sign of a flux? We can consider fluxes of mass or of heat. What are the units for a mass flux or a heat flux? The amount of a quantity transferred through a given area (A) in a given time (Δt) can be calculated as: Amount = F ⋅ A⋅ Δt For a heat flux, the amount of heat transferred is represented by ΔQH. Note: The textbook discusses kinematic fluxes, but we will not discuss fluxes in these terms in ATOC 3050. Unlike the textbook, we will use the symbol F to represent fluxes, not kinematic fluxes. What processes can cause a heat flux? Radiant flux: The radiant energy per unit area per unit time. Radiant energy: Energy transferred by electromagnetic waves (radiation). Radiation emitted by the sun is referred to as solar or shortwave radiation. Shortwave radiation – refers to the wavelength band (< 4 µm) that carries most of the energy associated with solar radiation Solar constant (or total solar irradiance) (S0): The solar radiative flux, perpendicular to the solar beam, that enters the top of the atmosphere -2 S0 = 1366 W m Radiation emitted by the earth is referred to as longwave, terrestrial, or infrared radiation.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiation Exchange Between Surfaces
    Chapter 1 Radiation Exchange Between Surfaces 1.1 Motivation and Objectives Thermal radiation, as you know, constitutes one of the three basic modes (or mechanisms) of heat transfer, i.e., conduction, convection, and radiation. Actually, on a physical basis, there are only two mechanisms of heat transfer; diffusion (the transfer of heat via molecular interactions) and radiation (the transfer of heat via photons/electomagnetic waves). Convection, being the bulk transport of a fluid, is not precisely a heat transfer mechanism. The physics of radiation transport are distinctly different than diffusion transport. The latter is a local phenomena, meaning that the rate of diffusion heat transfer, at a point in space, precisely depends only on the local nature about the point, i.e., the temperature gradient and thermal conductivity at the point. Of course, the temperature field will depend on the boundary and initial conditions imposed on the system. However, the diffusion heat flux at, say, one point in the system does not directly effect the diffusion flux at some distant point. Radiation, on the other hand, is not local; the flux of radiation at a point will, in general, be directly and instantaneously dependent on the radiation flux at all points in a system. Unlike diffusion, radiation can act over a distance. Accordingly, the mathematical description of radiation transport will employ an integral equation for the radiation field, as opposed to the differential equation for heat diffusion. Our objectives in studying radiation in the short amount of time left in the course will be to 1. Develop a basic physical understanding of electromagnetic radiation, with emphasis on the properties of radiation that are relevant to heat transfer.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Set of MODIS Land Products (MCD18): Downward Shortwave Radiation and Photosynthetically Active Radiation
    remote sensing Article A New Set of MODIS Land Products (MCD18): Downward Shortwave Radiation and Photosynthetically Active Radiation Dongdong Wang *, Shunlin Liang , Yi Zhang, Xueyuan Gao, Meredith G. L. Brown and Aolin Jia Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA; [email protected] (S.L.); [email protected] (Y.Z.); [email protected] (X.G.); [email protected] (M.G.L.B.); [email protected] (A.J.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-301-405-4567; Fax: +1-301-314-9299 Received: 24 November 2019; Accepted: 27 December 2019; Published: 3 January 2020 Abstract: Surface downward shortwave radiation (DSR) and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), its visible component, are key parameters needed for many land process models and terrestrial applications. Most existing DSR and PAR products were developed for climate studies and therefore have coarse spatial resolutions, which cannot satisfy the requirements of many applications. This paper introduces a new global high-resolution product of DSR (MCD18A1) and PAR (MCD18A2) over land surfaces using the MODIS data. The current version is Collection 6.0 at the spatial resolution of 5 km and two temporal resolutions (instantaneous and three-hour). A look-up table (LUT) based retrieval approach was chosen as the main operational algorithm so as to generate the products from the MODIS top-of-atmosphere (TOA) reflectance and other ancillary data sets. The new MCD18 products are archived and distributed via NASA’s Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center (LP DAAC). The products have been validated based on one year of ground radiation measurements at 33 Baseline Surface Radiation Network (BSRN) and 25 AmeriFlux stations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Habitability of Proxima Centauri B: II: Environmental States and Observational Discriminants
    The Habitability of Proxima Centauri b: II: Environmental States and Observational Discriminants Victoria S. Meadows1,2,3, Giada N. Arney1,2, Edward W. Schwieterman1,2, Jacob Lustig-Yaeger1,2, Andrew P. Lincowski1,2, Tyler Robinson4,2, Shawn D. Domagal-Goldman5,2, Rory K. Barnes1,2, David P. Fleming1,2, Russell Deitrick1,2, Rodrigo Luger1,2, Peter E. Driscoll6,2, Thomas R. Quinn1,2, David Crisp7,2 1Astronomy Department, University of Washington, Box 951580, Seattle, WA 98195 2NASA Astrobiology Institute – Virtual Planetary Laboratory Lead Team, USA 3E-mail: [email protected] 4Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, 5Planetary Environments Laboratory, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, 8800 Greenbelt Road, Greenbelt, MD 20771 6Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, Carnegie Institution for Science, Washington, DC 7Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, M/S 183-501, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Pasadena, CA 91109 Abstract Proxima Centauri b provides an unprecedented opportunity to understand the evolution and nature of terrestrial planets orbiting M dwarfs. Although Proxima Cen b orbits within its star’s habitable zone, multiple plausible evolutionary paths could have generated different environments that may or may not be habitable. Here we use 1D coupled climate-photochemical models to generate self- consistent atmospheres for several of the evolutionary scenarios predicted in our companion paper (Barnes et al., 2016). These include high-O2, high-CO2, and more Earth-like atmospheres, with either oxidizing or reducing compositions. We show that these modeled environments can be habitable or uninhabitable at Proxima Cen b’s position in the habitable zone. We use radiative transfer models to generate synthetic spectra and thermal phase curves for these simulated environments, and use instrument models to explore our ability to discriminate between possible planetary states.
    [Show full text]
  • Intensity Wave Length
    Module 9 Radiative Transfer in the Atmosphere 9.1 Introduction It has been emphasized in earlier lectures that energy from Sun drives the circulation of the atmosphere and ocean. Earth receives energy from Sun as ultraviolet, visible and near-infrared radiation. This radiation band is called the short wave radiation or radiation with wavelengths λ < 4 µm . An equal amount of energy is re-emitted by earth to maintain an overall energy balance. Earth emits energy in the form of infrared thermal radiation or longwave radiation with wavelengths λ > 4 µm . These two bands shown in Fig. 9.1 pertain to the wavelength intervals given as, Band 1: Solar spectrum 0.1− 4 µm (1 µm = 10−6 m) Band 2: Infrared region 4 −100 µm Sun Earth Fig. 9.1 Blackbody emission at the temperatures of Sun and Earth. 6000 K 288 K Intensity Overlap region Overlap 0.1 0.5 1 5 10 50 100 Wave length ( µ m ) Microwave radiation is not important for energy balance of the earth, but it finds wide use in remote sensing of the earth system because it is capable of penetrating through clouds. The study of radiative transfer in atmosphere and ocean is important because it leads to (i) a better understanding of energy transfer in these two components of the climate system; and (ii) in interpreting remote sensing measurements from satellites. Radiation is described by flux, intensity and radiance; and there are certain terms also that are frequently used while discussing the mathematics of the radiative transfer. First of all, it is required to calculate a differential amount of radiant energy dEλ ( J ) in a wavelength ( µm ) interval λ and λ + dλ that crosses an area ( m2 ) element dA in time (seconds) interval dt in a direction confined by an arc dω of the solid angle (steradian abbreviated as sr ).
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Text
    Chapter 2 The Global Energy Balance NON_PRINT ITEMS Abstract In this chapter the key role of the energy balance in determining the climate of Earth is introduced. The emission temperature of a planet and its dependence on planetary albedo and total solar irradiance are described. Simple models of the greenhouse effect are applied. Formulas for the distribution of daily-averaged insolation as a function of latitude and season are derived. Geographic and seasonal variations of the Earth’s top-of-atmosphere radiation balance are shown and discussed. The poleward transport of energy by the ocean and atmosphere are derived from the top-of-atmosphere energy constraint. Key Words Climate; energy budget of Earth; emission temperature of a planet; greenhouse effect; insolation; solar zenith angle; poleward energy transport; . Chapter Starts here 2.1 Warmth and Energy Temperature, a key climate variable, is a measure of the energy contained in the movement of molecules. To understand how the temperature is maintained, one must therefore consider the energy balance that is formally stated in the First Law of Thermodynamics. The basic global energy balance of Earth is between energy coming from the sun and energy returned to space by Earth’s radiative emission. The generation of energy in the interior of Earth has a negligible influence on its energy budget. The absorption of solar radiation takes place mostly at the surface 1 of Earth, whereas most of the emission to space originates in its atmosphere. Because the atmosphere is mostly transparent to solar radiation and mostly opaque to terrestrial emission of radiation, the surface of Earth is much warmer than it would be in the absence of its atmosphere.
    [Show full text]
  • Light Interception and Radiative Exchange in Crop Stands
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications Agronomy and Horticulture Department 1969 Light Interception and Radiative Exchange in Crop Stands John Monteith University of Nottingham, Loughborough, England Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agronomyfacpub Part of the Plant Sciences Commons Monteith, John, "Light Interception and Radiative Exchange in Crop Stands" (1969). Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications. 185. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/agronomyfacpub/185 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Agronomy and Horticulture Department at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Agronomy & Horticulture -- Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in Physiological Aspects of Crop Yield: Proceedings of a symposium sponsored by the University of Nebraska, the American Society of Agronomy, and the Crop Science Society of America, and held at the University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebr., January 20-24, 1969. Edited by Jerry D. Eastin, F. A. Haskins, C. Y. Sullivan, C. H. M. Van Bavel, and Richard C. Dinauer (Madison, Wisconsin: American Society of Agronomy & Crop Science Society of America, 1969). Copyright © 1969 American Society of Agronomy & Crop Science Society of America. Used by permission. 5 Light Interception and Radiative Exchange in Crop Stands JOHN L. MONTEITH University of Nottingham Loughborough, England I. RADIATION AND CROPS Crops grow and use water because they intercept radiation from the sun, the .sky, and the atmosphere. Diurnal changes of solar radiation dictate the diurnal course of photosynthesis and transpiration, and the vertical gradient of radiant flux in a canopy is a measure of the absorp­ tion of energy by foliage at different heights.
    [Show full text]
  • Radiative Transfer in Highly Scattering Materials--Numerical Solution and Evaluation of Approximate Analytic Solutions
    RADIATIVE TRANSFER IN HIGHLY SCATTERING MATERIALS--NUMERICAL SOLUTION AND EVALUATION OF APPROXIMATE ANALYTIC SOLUTIONS Kenneth C. Weston*, Albert C. Reynolds, Jr. " .ArifAlikhan* and Daniel W. Drago* The University of Tulsa, Tulsa, Oklahoma 74104 0 z o s z ABSTRACT 01 H 0 on z E Numerical solutions for radiative transport in a class of anisotropically scat- j 0 HS tering materials are presented. Conditions for convergence and divergence of the o tozm iterative method are given and supported by computed results. The relation of two 8- t9- flux theories to the equation of radiative transfer for isotropic scattering is discussed. r_ C bi H ; St The adequacy of the two flux approach for the reflectance, radiative flux and > radiative flux divergence of highly scattering media is evaluated with respect to -"= solutions of the radiative transfer equation. SThe authors gratefully acknowledge support of this work under NASA Grant NGR-37-008-003. The senior author wishes to express his appreciation to Phillip R. Nachtsheim and John T. Howe of NASA Ames Research Center and to Richard W. C Nelson of the Institute of Paper Chemistry for helpful discussions. n * Associate Professor. Member AIAA Lu) W t Assistant Professor o Research Assistants -N B 2 INTRODUCTION Radiative transport theories involving multiple scattering play an important role in the engineering analysis and simulation of the performance of diathermanous materials. Highly scattering dielectric materials have been proposed, for instance, for the entry heat protection of planetary probes [1]. Other applications include the evaluation of the reflectance of condensed deposits on cryogenic storage tanks [2] and the engineering analysis of opacity in the point and paper industry [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Climate of Proxima B with the Met Office Unified Model
    ORE Open Research Exeter TITLE Exploring the climate of Proxima B with the Met Office Unified Model AUTHORS Boutle, I; Mayne, NJ; Drummond, B; et al. JOURNAL Astronomy and Astrophysics DEPOSITED IN ORE 27 February 2017 This version available at http://hdl.handle.net/10871/26089 COPYRIGHT AND REUSE Open Research Exeter makes this work available in accordance with publisher policies. A NOTE ON VERSIONS The version presented here may differ from the published version. If citing, you are advised to consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. proxb c ESO 2017 February 27, 2017 Exploring the climate of Proxima B with the Met Office Unified Model Ian A. Boutle1, Nathan J. Mayne2, Benjamin Drummond2, James Manners1, Jayesh Goyal2, F. Hugo Lambert3, David M. Acreman2 and Paul D. Earnshaw1 1 Met Office, FitzRoy Road, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK e-mail: [email protected] 2 Physics and Astronomy, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QL, UK 3 Mathematics, College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, EX4 4QF, UK February 27, 2017 ABSTRACT We present results of simulations of the climate of the newly discovered planet Proxima Centauri B, performed using the Met Office Unified Model (UM). We examine the responses of both an ‘Earth-like’ atmosphere and simplified nitrogen and trace carbon dioxide atmosphere to the radiation likely received by Proxima Centauri B. Additionally, we explore the effects of orbital eccentricity on the planetary conditions using a range of eccentricities guided by the observational constraints.
    [Show full text]
  • Advances in Top-Of-Atmosphere Radiative Flux Estimation from the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) Satellite Instrument N
    Advances in Top-of-Atmosphere Radiative Flux Estimation from the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System (CERES) Satellite Instrument N. G. Loeb1*, N. Manalo-Smith2, K. Loukachine3, S. Kato1, B. A. Wielicki4 1Hampton University, Hampton, VA 2Analytical Services and Materials, Inc., Hampton, VA 3Science Application International Corporation, Hampton, VA 4NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA Abstract-This study introduces new CERES Angular rotates in azimuth, thus acquiring radiance measurements Distribution Models (ADMs) for estimating shortwave, from a wide range of viewing configurations. The CERES longwave and window top-of-atmosphere radiative fluxes from instrument on TRMM was shown to provide an broadband radiance measurements. By combining CERES unprecedented level of calibration stability (≈0.25%) between measurements with narrowband, high-resolution imager measurements, up to a factor 4 improvement in TOA flux in-orbit and ground calibration [3]. Unfortunately, the accuracy is achieved compared to TOA flux estimates from CERES/TRMM instrument suffered a voltage converter previous experiments, such as ERBE. anomaly and only acquired 9 months of science data. All nine months of the CERES/TRMM Single Scanner I. INTRODUCTION Footprint TOA/Surface Fluxes and Clouds (SSF) product The clouds and the Earth’s Radiant Energy System between 40°S-40°N from January-August 1998, and March (CERES) investigates the critical role that clouds and 2000, are considered. The CERES SSF product combines aerosols play in modulating the radiative
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 10. Surface Energy Balance (Garratt 5.1-5.2) in This Lecture
    Atm S 547 Boundary Layer Meteorology Bretherton Lecture 10. Surface Energy Balance (Garratt 5.1-5.2) In this lecture… • Diurnal cycle of surface energy flux components over different surfaces • Radiative and material properties of different surfaces • Conductive penetration of surface temperature variations into the ground. The balance of energy at the earth's surface is inextricably linked to the overlying atmospheric boundary layer. In this lecture, we consider the energy budget of different kinds of surfaces. Consider first an ideal surface, which is a very thin interface between the air and an underlying solid or liquid medium that is opaque to radiation. Because it is thin, this surface has negligible heat capacity, and conservation of energy at the surface requires that RN = HS + HL + HG, (10.1) where (note sign conventions): HS (often just called H) is the upward surface sensible heat flux HL = LE is the upward surface latent heat flux due to evaporation at rate E HG is the downward ground heat flux into the subsurface medium. RN is the net downward radiative flux (longwave + shortwave). 6 -1 L = 2.5×10 J kg is the latent heat of vaporization. The Bowen ratio B = HS /HL. Over land, there is a large diurnal variation in the surface energy budget (see Figure 10.1). Over large bodies of water, the large heat capacity of the medium and the absorption of solar radiation over a large depth combine to reduce the near-surface diurnal temperature variability, so HS and HL vary much less. However, the surface `skin temperature' of a tropical ocean can vary diurnally by up to 3 K in sunny, light-wind conditions.
    [Show full text]