DOCSLIB.ORG

Relative Stability of Diamond and Graphite As Seen Through Bonds and Hybridizations Cite This: Phys

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Relative Stability of Diamond and Graphite As Seen Through Bonds and Hybridizations Cite This: Phys PCCP View Article Online PAPER View Journal | View Issue Relative stability of diamond and graphite as seen through bonds and hybridizations Cite this: Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019, 21, 10961 ab c abc Ilya V. Popov, Arno L. Go¨rne, Andrei L. Tchougre´eff * and Richard Dronskowski *cd The relative stability of the two most important forms of elemental carbon, diamond and graphite, is readdressed from a newly developed perspective as derived from historically well-known roots. Unlike other theoretical studies mostly relying on numerical methods, we consider an analytical model to gain fundamental insight into the reasons for the quasi-degeneracy of diamond and graphite despite their extremely different covalent bonding patterns. We derive the allotropes’ relative energies and provide a Received 12th December 2018, qualitative picture predicting a quasi-degenerate electronic ground state for graphite (graphene) and Accepted 26th March 2019 diamond at zero temperature. Our approach also gives numerical estimates of the energy difference and DOI: 10.1039/c8cp07592a interatomic separations in good agreement with experimental data and recent results of hybrid DFT Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. modeling, although obtained with a much smaller numerical but highly transparent effort. An attempt to rsc.li/pccp extend this treatment to the lowest energy allotropes of silicon proves to be successful as well. Introduction Carbon allotropes are a hot topic with a plethora of newly proposed ones, predicted to have fascinating physical proper- ties. To navigate this large zoo of allotropes, we recommend a This article is licensed under a comprehensive and timely database,1 a survey2 and two recent articles dealing with the bonding of these carbon allotropes3 8 9 and sp-mixing triangle maps from first principles.4 The experi- Fig. 1 Crystal structures of diamond, graphite and lonsdaleite, the hexagonal form of diamond.10 Open Access Article. Published on 20 May 2019. Downloaded 9/30/2021 4:34:33 PM. mentally available allotropes are by far less numerous but of interest in different areas: graphene and fullerenes are popular materials in material sciences and electrochemistry,5,6 and modified nanotubes have been found to be efficient catalytic local arrangements of C–C bonds but differing by the hexagonal systems.7 Despite the impressive diversity of novel carbons, the ABAB stacking as compared to the cubic ABCABC one (Fig. 1). well-known diamond and graphite (Fig. 1, as well as hexagonal The most intriguing fact about diamond and graphite is diamond dubbed lonsdaleite) form the centerpiece of the entire their relative stability. Experimentally, graphite is thermodynami- carbon story. These two allotropes have been known to humans cally more stable at 1 atm and 298 K, but only barely (ca. 2 kJ molÀ1, for thousands of years, being the only crystalline forms present that is, they are degenerate within a chemical accuracy of in nature rather than prepared artificially. Also, they are the 1kcalmolÀ1). Any attempt to find a rigorous explanation of this most studied carbons and prototypical for other allotropes quasi-degeneracy stumbles upon the problem that diamond and variously combining sp3- and sp2-hybridized C atoms.2,11–13 graphite are just too different from the point of view of, say, Remarkably, diamond itself can exist in two forms, the usual topology, which is accepted as a basis of allotrope classification in cubic diamond and hexagonal lonsdaleite10 featuring the same ref. 1. Indeed, diamond and graphite adopt different space-group symmetry, different unit cells, different band structures and a A.N. Frumkin Institute of Physical Chemistry and Electrochemistry of the Russian extremely different physical properties, so why should they have Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia (almost) equal energies? We recall that solid-state chemistry b Independent University of Moscow, Moscow, Russia would portray diamond and graphite as species featuring c Chair of Solid State and Quantum Chemistry, RWTH Aachen University, different hybridization patterns (sp3 vs. sp2), different localiza- 52056 Aachen, Germany. E-mail: andrei.tchougreeff@ac.rwth-aachen.de, [email protected] tion, and different covalent bonding types. Thus, it might look d Ju¨lich–Aachen Research Alliance, JARA-HPC, RWTH Aachen University, easier to explain if graphite were significantly more stable since 52056 Aachen, Germany the delocalized p-system might also decrease graphite’s total This journal is © the Owner Societies 2019 Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2019, 21, 10961--10969 | 10961 View Article Online Paper PCCP energy as habitually evoked in organic chemistry. Vice versa,if above diamond. This suggests that, within chemical accuracy, diamond were significantly more stable, one might argue in diamond and graphene (and graphite, too) are almost degen- terms of the larger number of strong covalent bonds per atom. erate states of carbon. Thus, we use graphene in our considera- A recent, comprehensive DFT study of the relative stability of tions for reasons of simplicity. diamond and graphite14 provides valuable numerical informa- tion on the exact allotropic energy difference under different Model conditions, but in our contribution, we try to understand how diamond and graphite can come so close on the energy scale in Now, we turn to constructing an analytical model of the electronic terms of an analytical model. structuresforbothcarbonallotropes, relying upon fundamental chemical concepts such as bonding, hybridization etc. Like in the Experimental situation Molecular Mechanics or Force Field22–27 approaches, we represent the energy of each allotrope as a sum of energies of the bonds First, we specify the quantity to be reproduced. Under standard formed by differently hybridized orbitals, complemented by the conditions, the difference in Gibbs energies DG1 between energies of atoms in the respective hybridization states and by the diamond and graphite falls in the range of 2.87–2.90 kJ molÀ1, energy of repulsion of the atomic ‘‘cores’’, that is, the atoms bereft graphite being lower,15 but this quantity is contaminated by the of their valence electrons.† Instead of aprioriinferring the form of lattice contribution. Since the crystal structures and elasticity the bond energies, we use expressions stemming from a general modules and, thus, the phonon spectra are rather different, one quantum-mechanical theory of the molecular electronic structure, 28–30 cannot a priori exclude changes in the order of electronic the formal background being the group-function formalism. 3 energies. We therefore extrapolated the difference in Gibbs The diamond energy per atom is that of the sp hybridized energies to zero temperature; the standard experimental data carbon atom supplied by the energies of two s-bonds formed (NIST) of entropy and heat capacities for graphite (see Appendix A)16 by these hybrids (four s-bonds counted 50% per atom) and 3 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported Licence. are fit to the Debye–Sommerfeld model, Cp = gT + aT . For diamond, the structure-dependent repulsion energy. Likewise, graphene 2 this yields g = 0 (nonmetallic and no other degrees of freedom contains 3/2 s-bonds formed by sp hybrids per atom, but their yielding a linear term) but graphite features so called flexural energy must be augmented by that of a delocalized p-electron vibrations (Fig. 2),17 whose dispersion law produces a T2 con- per atom. Thus, we write tribution to the low-temperature heat capacity, as predicted 3 3 ðDÞ EDiamond ¼ E0ðsp Þþ2Esðsp ÞþE quite long ago19 and documented experimentally.20 Even with rep (1) accounting for the flexural modes, graphite is still more stable 3 3 E ¼ E ðsp2Þþ E ðsp2Þþ E þ EðGÞ than diamond at 0 K, but the difference in Gibbs energies is Graphite 0 2 s 2 p rep even smaller (1.39–1.55 kJ molÀ1) than at room temperature. This article is licensed under a and call E0(h) the hybridization-dependent one-center energies, Taking into account the ZPEs (as estimated in ref. 14) of either that is, the sums of core attraction and mutual repulsion of the allotrope yields a difference of electronic energies in the range À1 valence electrons in the atoms. Es(h) are the energies of s- of 0.14–0.78 kJ mol in favor of graphite. 3 2 bonds formed by the sp and sp hybrid orbitals, Ep is the Open Access Article. Published on 20 May 2019. Downloaded 9/30/2021 4:34:33 PM. Another uncertainty is the weak interaction between the gra- energy of the p-electrons in graphene recalculated per number phene layers forming graphite. To avoid this overwhelmingly of nearest neighbors of each atom, so the multipliers equal 3/2, complex problem (in particular when relying on DFT approaches), (A) and Erep represents the core–core repulsions of the carbon we notice that adding the recently21 determined exfoliation energy atoms specific for each allotrope due to structural differences. of graphite (about 3 kJ per mole of carbon atoms) puts the Clearly, the carbon atoms in the allotropes have different electronic energy of an individual graphene sheet ca. 2.5–3 kJ molÀ1 hybridizations. Normally, the one-center energies E0(h) strongly depend on hybridization,31–33 but the allotropes of the group IV elements represent a remarkable exception.31 For them, the populations of all atomic hybrid orbitals are equal to unity, and the one-center terms are equal in graphene and diamond (see proof in Appendix B), so we can exclude them from now on. (D) (G) The repulsion energies Erep and Erep come from the general formula for the repulsion of the atomic charge distribution if one takes into account the differences between interactions of the core point charges and of the electron distributions with a spatial extent.30,32 Hence, repulsive interactions between elec- troneutral atoms acquire a quasi-Yukawa form Y(d), that is, dÀ1 † For the carbon atom, the effective core charge arrives at +4 because there is an electronic configuration of 1s22s22p2 from which the 2s22p2 valence electrons are Fig.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Chemistry of Carbene-Stabilized
    THE CHEMISTRY OF CARBENE-STABILIZED MAIN GROUP DIATOMIC ALLOTROPES by MARIHAM ABRAHAM (Under the Direction of Gregory H. Robinson) ABSTRACT The syntheses and molecular structures of carbene-stabilized arsenic derivatives of 1 1 i 1 1 AsCl3 (L :AsCl3 (1); L : = :C{N(2,6- Pr2C6H3)CH}2), and As2 (L :As–As:L (2)), are presented herein. The potassium graphite reduction of 1 afforded the carbene-stabilized diarsenic complex, 2. Notably, compound 2 is the first Lewis base stabilized diatomic molecule of the Group 13–15 elements, in the formal oxidation state of zero, in the fourth period or lower of the Periodic Table. Compound 2 contains one As–As σ-bond and two lone pairs of electrons on each arsenic atom. In an effort to study the chemistry of the electron-rich compound 2, it was combined with an electron-deficient Lewis acid, GaCl3. The addition of two equivalents of GaCl3 to 2 resulted in one-electron oxidation of 2 to 1 1 •+ – •+ – give [L :As As:L ] [GaCl4] (6 [GaCl4] ). Conversely, the addition of four equivalents of GaCl3 to 2 resulted in two- electron oxidation of 2 to give 1 1 2+ – 2+ – •+ [L :As=As:L ] [GaCl4 ]2 (6 [GaCl4 ]2). Strikingly, 6 represents the first arsenic radical to be structurally characterized in the solid state. The research project also explored the reactivity of carbene-stabilized disilicon, (L1:Si=Si:L1 (7)), with borane. The reaction of 7 with BH3·THF afforded two unique compounds: one containing a parent silylene (:SiH2) unit (8), and another containing a three-membered silylene ring (9).
    [Show full text]
  • Optical and Collective Properties of Excitons in 2D Semiconductors
    Optical and Collective Properties of Excitons in 2D Semiconductors by Matthew N. Brunetti A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Physics in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, The City University of New York 2019 ii © 2019 Matthew N. Brunetti All Rights Reserved iii This manuscript has been read and accepted by the Graduate Faculty in Physics in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Professor Oleg L. Berman Date Chair of Examining Committee Professor Igor L. Kuskovsky Date Executive Officer Professor Roman Ya. Kezerashvili Distinguished Professor Godfrey Gumbs Professor Antonios Balassis Professor Paula Fekete Supervisory Committee The City University of New York iv Abstract Optical and Collective Properties of Excitons in 2D Semiconductors by Matthew N. Brunetti Advisers: Professor Oleg L. Berman & Professor Roman Ya. Kezerashvili We study the properties of excitons in 2D semiconductors (2DSC) by numerically solv- ing the Schrödinger equation for an interacting electron and hole in the effective mass ap- proximation, then calculating optical properties such as the transition energies, oscillator strengths, and absorption coefficients. Our theoretical approach allows us to consider both direct excitons in monolayer (ML) 2DSC and spatially indirect excitons in heterostructures (HS) consisting of two 2DSC MLs separated by few-layer insulating hexagonal boron nitride (h-BN). In particular, we study indirect excitons in TMDC HS, namely MoS2, MoSe2, WS2, and WSe2; both direct and indirect excitons in the buckled 2D allotropes of silicon, germa- nium, and tin, known as silicene, germanene, and stanene respectively, or collectively as the Xenes; and both direct and indirect excitons in the anisotropic 2DSC phosphorene, the 2D allotrope of black phosphorus.
    [Show full text]
  • Silicite: the Layered Allotrope of Silicon
    Silicite: the layered allotrope of silicon Seymur Cahangirov,1 V. Ongun Oz¸celik,¨ 2, 3 Angel Rubio,1, ∗ and Salim Ciraci4, y 1Nano-Bio Spectroscopy Group and ETSF Scientific Development Centre, Departamento de F´ısica de Materiales, Universidad del Pa´ısVasco, CSIC-UPV/EHU-MPC and DIPC, Avenida de Tolosa 72, E-20018 San Sebastian, Spain 2UNAM-National Nanotechnology Research Center, Bilkent University, 06800 Ankara, Turkey 3Institute of Materials Science and Nanotechnology, Bilkent University, Ankara 06800, Turkey 4Department of Physics, Bilkent University, Ankara 06800, Turkey (Dated: September 28, 2018) Based on first-principles calculation we predict two new thermodynamically stable layered-phases of silicon, named as silicites, which exhibit strong directionality in the electronic and structural properties. As compared to silicon crystal, they have wider indirect band gaps but also increased absorption in the visible range making them more interesting for photovoltaic applications. These stable phases consistp p of intriguing stacking of dumbbell patterned silicene layers having trigonal structure with 3 × 3 periodicity of silicene and have cohesive energies smaller but comparable to that of the cubic diamond silicon. Our findings also provide atomic scale mechanisms for the growth of multilayer silicene as well as silicites. PACS numbers: 68.65.Ac, 73.61.Ey, 81.05.Dz I. INTRODUCTION II. METHODS We have performed state-of-the-art density functional Early studies1,2 to answer the critical question of theory (DFT) calculations within generalized gradi- ent approximation(GGA). We used projector-augmented whether Si can form graphene-like monolayer structures 14 have been ruled out initially by the arguments that Si wave potentials PAW and the exchange-correlation po- 3{5 tential is approximated with Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof, does not have a layered allotrope like graphite .
    [Show full text]
  • Intercalation of Si Between Mos2 Layers Rik Van Bremen‡1, Qirong Yao‡1, Soumya Banerjee2, Deniz Cakir2, Nuri Oncel2 and Harold J
    Intercalation of Si between MoS2 layers Rik van Bremen‡1, Qirong Yao‡1, Soumya Banerjee2, Deniz Cakir2, Nuri Oncel2 and Harold J. W. Zandvliet*1 Full Research Paper Open Access Address: Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2017, 8, 1952–1960. 1Physics of Interfaces and Nanomaterials, MESA+ Institute for doi:10.3762/bjnano.8.196 Nanotechnology, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500AE Enschede, Netherlands and 2Department of Physics and Received: 29 March 2017 Astrophysics, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND 58202, Accepted: 21 August 2017 USA Published: 19 September 2017 Email: This article is part of the Thematic Series "Silicene, germanene and other Harold J. W. Zandvliet* - [email protected] group IV 2D materials". * Corresponding author ‡ Equal contributors Guest Editor: P. Vogt Keywords: © 2017 van Bremen et al.; licensee Beilstein-Institut. intercalation; molybdenum disulfide; scanning tunneling microscopy; License and terms: see end of document. silicene; two-dimensional materials Abstract We report a combined experimental and theoretical study of the growth of sub-monolayer amounts of silicon (Si) on molybdenum disulfide (MoS2). At room temperature and low deposition rates we have found compelling evidence that the deposited Si atoms intercalate between the MoS2 layers. Our evidence relies on several experimental observations: (1) Upon the deposition of Si on pristine MoS2 the morphology of the surface transforms from a smooth surface to a hill-and-valley surface. The lattice constant of the hill-and-valley structure amounts to 3.16 Å, which is exactly the lattice constant of pristine MoS2. (2) The transitions from hills to valleys are not abrupt, as one would expect for epitaxial islands growing on-top of a substrate, but very gradual.
    [Show full text]
  • Zintl Phases As Reactive Precursors for Synthesis of Novel Silicon and Germanium-Based Materials
    materials Review Zintl Phases as Reactive Precursors for Synthesis of Novel Silicon and Germanium-Based Materials Matt Beekman 1,* , Susan M. Kauzlarich 2 , Luke Doherty 1,3 and George S. Nolas 4 1 Department of Physics, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Chemistry, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA; [email protected] 3 Department of Materials Engineering, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407, USA 4 Department of Physics, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 5 February 2019; Accepted: 27 March 2019; Published: 8 April 2019 Abstract: Recent experimental and theoretical work has demonstrated significant potential to tune the properties of silicon and germanium by adjusting the mesostructure, nanostructure, and/or crystalline structure of these group 14 elements. Despite the promise to achieve enhanced functionality with these already technologically important elements, a significant challenge lies in the identification of effective synthetic approaches that can access metastable silicon and germanium-based extended solids with a particular crystal structure or specific nano/meso-structured features. In this context, the class of intermetallic compounds known as Zintl phases has provided a platform for discovery of novel silicon and germanium-based materials. This review highlights some of the ways in which silicon and germanium-based Zintl phases have been utilized as precursors in innovative approaches to synthesize new crystalline modifications, nanoparticles, nanosheets, and mesostructured and nanoporous extended solids with properties that can be very different from the ground states of the elements.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural and Electronic Properties of Germanene on Mos2
    week ending PRL 116, 256804 (2016) PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 24 JUNE 2016 Structural and Electronic Properties of Germanene on MoS2 L. Zhang,1 P. Bampoulis,1 A. N. Rudenko,2 Q. Yao,1 A. van Houselt,1 B. Poelsema,1 M. I. Katsnelson,2 and H. J. W. Zandvliet1,* 1Physics of Interfaces and Nanomaterials, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Twente, P.O. Box 217, 7500 AE Enschede, The Netherlands 2Institute for Molecules and Materials, Radboud University, Heijendaalseweg 135, 6525 AJ Nijmegen, The Netherlands (Received 24 January 2016; published 21 June 2016) To date germanene has only been synthesized on metallic substrates. A metallic substrate is usually detrimental for the two-dimensional Dirac nature of germanene because the important electronic states near the Fermi level of germanene can hybridize with the electronic states of the metallic substrate. Here we report the successful synthesis of germanene on molybdenum disulfide (MoS2), a band gap material. Preexisting defects in the MoS2 surface act as preferential nucleation sites for the germanene islands. The lattice constant of the germanene layer (3.8 Æ 0.2 Å) is about 20% larger than the lattice constant of the MoS2 substrate (3.16 Å). Scanning tunneling spectroscopy measurements and density functional theory calculations reveal that there are, besides the linearly dispersing bands at the K points, two parabolic bands that cross the Fermi level at the Γ point. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.256804 The discovery that graphene, a single layer of sp2 edges of the material [6,7]. The two topologically protected hybridized carbon atoms arranged in a honeycomb registry, spin-polarized edge modes have opposite propagation is stable, has resulted in numerous intriguing and exciting directions and therefore the charge conductance vanishes, scientific breakthroughs [1,2].
    [Show full text]
  • A New Silicon Allotrope with Interesting Physical Properties
    materials Article Si96: A New Silicon Allotrope with Interesting Physical Properties Qingyang Fan 1,*, Changchun Chai 1, Qun Wei 2, Peikun Zhou 3, Junqin Zhang 1 and Yintang Yang 1 1 Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Wide Band-Gap Semiconductor Materials and Devices, School of Microelectronics, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, China; [email protected] (C.C.); [email protected] (J.Z.); [email protected] (Y.Y.) 2 School of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Xidian University, Xi’an 710071, China; [email protected] 3 Faculty of Science, University of Paris-Sud, Paris 91400, France; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-29-8820-2507 Academic Editor: Martin O. Steinhauser Received: 22 January 2016; Accepted: 7 April 2016; Published: 13 April 2016 Abstract: The structural mechanical properties and electronic properties of a new silicon allotrope Si96 are investigated at ambient pressure by using a first-principles calculation method with the ultrasoft pseudopotential scheme in the framework of generalized gradient approximation. The elastic constants and phonon calculations reveal that Si96 is mechanically and dynamically stable at ambient pressure. The conduction band minimum and valence band maximum of Si96 are at the R and G point, which indicates that Si96 is an indirect band gap semiconductor. The anisotropic calculations show that Si96 exhibits a smaller anisotropy than diamond Si in terms of Young’s modulus, the percentage of elastic anisotropy for bulk modulus and shear modulus, and the universal anisotropic index AU. Interestingly, most silicon allotropes exhibit brittle behavior, in contrast to the previously proposed ductile behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Isotope Effect on Electron Paramagnetic Resonance of Boron Acceptors in Silicon
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B 82, 115213 ͑2010͒ Isotope effect on electron paramagnetic resonance of boron acceptors in silicon A. R. Stegner,1,* H. Tezuka,2 T. Andlauer,1 M. Stutzmann,1 M. L. W. Thewalt,3 M. S. Brandt,1 and K. M. Itoh2 1Walter Schottky Institut, Technische Universität München, Am Coulombwall 3, 85748 Garching, Germany 2School of Fundamental Science and Technology, Keio University, Yokohama 223-8522, Japan 3Department of Physics, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada V5A 1S6 ͑Received 20 April 2010; revised manuscript received 15 August 2010; published 27 September 2010͒ The fourfold degeneracy of the boron acceptor ground state in silicon, which is easily lifted by any symmetry-breaking perturbation, allows for a strong inhomogeneous broadening of the boron-related electron paramagnetic resonance ͑EPR͒ lines, e.g., by a random distribution of local strains. However, since EPR of boron acceptors in externally unstrained silicon was reported initially, neither the line shape nor the magnitude of the residual broadening observed in samples with high-crystalline purity were compatible with the low concentrations of carbon and oxygen point defects, being the predominant source of random local strain. Adapting a theoretical model which has been applied to understand the acceptor ground-state splitting in the absence of a magnetic field as an effect due to the presence of different silicon isotopes, we show that local fluctuations of the valence-band edge due to different isotopic configurations in the vicinity of the boron acceptors can quantitatively account for all inhomogeneous broadening effects in high-purity Si with a natural isotope composition.
    [Show full text]
  • Metals/Nonmetals Packet
    Metals )o Directions:Complete thetoble below by writing the name of each of the following metols under the conect heoding.Ilse the periodic table in your tutbook ifyou need help. barium sodium iron magnesium francium sffontium cadmium zinc nickel mercury gold cobalt calcium radium silver chromium potassium lithium copPel cesium 3' Transitionelements )o o c o .!9 phrase but completesthesentence. c toreoch of thefollowing, write the letter of theterm or thot o Directions: e E o 4. The transition elementsare in Groups ? a. 1-12 b. 3-13 c,3-12 d. 3-s I G o o 5.Themost highly reactiveof all metalsare the o a. coinagemitals c. iron triad b. alkaline earth metals d. alkali metals 0 o = 5. The alkali metalsmake uP of the periodictable. o - = a. Group 1 b. Group 2 c Group 15 d. Group 18 o 7. The elementsthat makeup the iron triad are =o c. alkali metals t a. radioactive o o earth metals C b. transition d. alkaline o 6 e 8. The inner transition metalsinclude the -. jor metalsand hdogens c. Ianthanidesand actinides a a" alkali () b. carbongrouP and noble gasses d. alkaline earth metals onlY the periodic table. 9. The alkalineearth metalsmake uP - of )o a. Group I b. Group 2 c. Group 17 d. Group 18 Efaaanl: rnd ?La!i Drarar+i* 'r, Nonmetals Dircctions:Complete thefollowing table thot compores theproperties of metals and nonmetals bysupplying theinformotion requuted. 1. Appearanceof solid 2. ls it malleable? 3. ls it ductile? 4. Doesit conductheat well? 5. Doesit conductelectricity well? 6. Most commonstate at room temperature.
    [Show full text]
  • Prediction of Novel Phase of Silicon and Si–Ge Alloys
    Journal of Solid State Chemistry 233 (2016) 471–483 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Journal of Solid State Chemistry journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jssc Prediction of novel phase of silicon and Si–Ge alloys Qingyang Fan a, Changchun Chai a, Qun Wei b,n, Yintang Yang a, Qi Yang a, Pengyuan Chen a, Mengjiang Xing c, Junqin Zhang a, Ronghui Yao b a Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Wide Band-Gap Semiconductor Materials and Devices, School of Microelectronics, Xidian University, Xi'an 710071, PR China b School of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Xidian University, Xi'an 710071, PR China c Faculty of Information Engineering & Automation, Kunming University of Science and Technology, Kunming 650051, PR China article info abstract Article history: The structural, thermodynamic, elastic, anisotropic and electronic properties of P2221-Si have been Received 21 August 2015 studied using first-principles calculations. The elastic constants are satisfied with mechanical stability Received in revised form criteria. The mechanical anisotropy is predicted by anisotropic constants Poisson's ratio, shear modulus, 5 November 2015 Young's modulus and three dimensional curved surface of Young's modulus. These results show that Accepted 13 November 2015 P222 -Si and Si–Ge alloys are anisotropic. The sound velocities in different directions and Debye tem- Available online 1 December 2015 1 perature for P2221-Si and Si–Ge alloys are also predicted. Electronic structure study shows that P2221-Si Keywords: is an indirect semiconductor with band gap of 0.90 eV. In addition, the band structures of Si–Ge alloys are Silicon investigated in this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Institutional Repository - Research Portal Dépôt Institutionnel - Portail De La Recherche
    Institutional Repository - Research Portal Dépôt Institutionnel - Portail de la Recherche University of Namurresearchportal.unamur.be THESIS / THÈSE DOCTOR OF SCIENCES Synthesis and applications of novel fullerenes and silsesquioxanes based structures Author(s) - Auteur(s) : Cinà, Valerio Award date: 2020 Awarding institution: University of Namur Supervisor - Co-Supervisor / Promoteur - Co-Promoteur : Link to publication Publication date - Date de publication : Permanent link - Permalien : Rights / License - Licence de droit d’auteur : General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. BibliothèqueDownload date: Universitaire 11. oct.. 2021 Moretus Plantin Università degli Studi di Palermo Université de Namur Dottorato di Ricerca in Doctorat en Sciences Scienze Molecolari e Biomolecolari Faculté de Sciences Dipartimento STEBICEF Département de Chimie S. S. D. – CHIM/06 SYNTHESIS AND APPLICATIONS OF NOVEL FULLERENES AND SILSESQUIOXANES BASED STRUCTURES PhD STUDENT COORDINATOR VALERIO CINÀ PROF. PATRIZIA DIANA TUTOR TUTOR PROF. FRANCESCO GIACALONE PROF.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Science(Glencoe) 2005 Ed
    Mixed Groups 7f)w You'll Learn It's Important Review Vocabulary • Distinguish among metals, The elements in mixed groups affect substance: element or compound nonmetals, and metalloids. your life every day, because they are that cannot be broken down into • Describe the nature of allotropes. in everything from the computer you simpler components • Recognize the significance of use to the air you breathe. differences in crystal structure New Vocabulary in carbon. • metalloid • Understand the importance • allotrope of synthetic elements. • semiconductor • transuranium element Properties of Metalloids The Boron Group Can an element be a metal and a nonmetal? In a sense, some 5 elements called metalloids are. Metalloids share unusual charac- B teristics. Metalloids can form ionic and covalent bonds with 13 other elements and can have metallic and nonmetallic proper- AI r ties. Some metalloids can conduct electricity better than most 31 nonmetals, but not as well as some metals, giving them the Ga name semiconductor. '>\lith the exception of aluminum, the 49 metalloids are the elements in the periodic table that are located In along the stair-step line. The mixed groups-13, 14, 15, 16, and " /J 81 II I 17-contain metals, nonmetals, and metalloids. 'HI TI I I The Boron Group Figure 16 Aluminum is used fre- Boron, a metalloid, is the first element in Group 13. Ifyou look quently in the construction of air- around your home, you might find two compounds ofboron. One planes because it is light and strong. of these is borax, which is used in some laundry products to soften water.
    [Show full text]