Nos. 18-575 and 18-581 In the Supreme Court of the United States YPF S.A., PETITIONER v. PETERSEN ENERGIA INVERSORA S.A.U., ET AL. ARGENTINE REPUBLIC, PETITIONER v. PETERSEN ENERGIA INVERSORA S.A.U., ET AL. ON PETITIONS FOR WRITS OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT BRIEF FOR THE UNITED STATES AS AMICUS CURIAE NOEL J. FRANCISCO Solicitor General Counsel of Record JOSEPH H. HUNT Assistant Attorney General EDWIN S. KNEEDLER Deputy Solicitor General VIVEK SURI Assistant to the Solicitor General SHARON SWINGLE KATHERINE TWOMEY ALLEN Attorneys RICHARD C. VISEK Department of Justice Acting Legal Adviser Washington, D.C. 20530-0001 Department of State
[email protected] Washington, D.C. 20520 (202) 514-2217 QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the court of appeals correctly held that the “commercial activity” exception to foreign sovereign immunity in the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976, 28 U.S.C. 1605(a)(2), applies to respondents’ claims. (I) TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Interest of the United States....................................................... 1 Statement ...................................................................................... 1 Discussion ...................................................................................... 9 Conclusion ................................................................................... 19 TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Cases: Animal Sci. Prods., Inc. v. Hebei Welcome Pharm. Co., 138 S. Ct. 1865 (2018) .................................................. 14