DOCSLIB.ORG

Ways of Relating to the Mathematics of the Past

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ways of Relating to the Mathematics of the Past Journal of Humanistic Mathematics Volume 8 | Issue 1 January 2018 Ways of Relating to the Mathematics of the Past Michael N. Fried Ben Gurion University of the Negev Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/jhm Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons, and the Mathematics Commons Recommended Citation Fried, M. N. "Ways of Relating to the Mathematics of the Past," Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, Volume 8 Issue 1 (January 2018), pages 3-23. DOI: 10.5642/jhummath.201801.03 . Available at: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/jhm/vol8/iss1/3 ©2018 by the authors. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License. JHM is an open access bi-annual journal sponsored by the Claremont Center for the Mathematical Sciences and published by the Claremont Colleges Library | ISSN 2159-8118 | http://scholarship.claremont.edu/jhm/ The editorial staff of JHM works hard to make sure the scholarship disseminated in JHM is accurate and upholds professional ethical guidelines. However the views and opinions expressed in each published manuscript belong exclusively to the individual contributor(s). The publisher and the editors do not endorse or accept responsibility for them. See https://scholarship.claremont.edu/jhm/policies.html for more information. Ways of Relating to the Mathematics of the Past Cover Page Footnote This piece was originally presented as a lecture at the MAA-Short Course: Reading, Writing and Doing the History of Mathematics: Learning the Methods of Historical Research, held in Baltimore, MD, January, 2014. This work is available in Journal of Humanistic Mathematics: https://scholarship.claremont.edu/jhm/vol8/iss1/3 Ways of Relating to the Mathematics of the Past1 Michael N. Fried Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, ISRAEL [email protected] Abstract Historians of mathematics, by definition, look at mathematics of the past. But mathematicians, too, often look at mathematics of the past; mathematicians of the past themselves often looked very closely at mathematics of their own past. Is their relationship to the past the same as that of the historians? Is every view of the past an historical view? Indeed, is every historical view historical in the same way? Or is it possible that there are different kinds of relationships to the mathematics of the past? This paper will suggest that there are in fact a variety of such relationships. It will try to catalog some of these, without judgment as to whether they are necessarily correct or legitimate. It will also raise the question as to whether mathematics educators interested in the history mathematics have their own distinct relationship with the mathematics of the past or are aligned with one type or another. Introduction I would like to begin this piece autobiographically. When I started to work on the history of mathematics, I confess I did not give much thought as to the nature of the subject. I liked mathematics and I liked history. I liked biography and I also liked the Greeks. So I thought it might be fun to study a mathematician like Apollonius of Perga. I worked with the historian of mathematics Sabetai Unguru. Because of his own work and his own example, 1 This piece was originally presented as a lecture at the MAA-Short Course: Read- ing, Writing and Doing the History of Mathematics: Learning the Methods of Historical Research, held in Baltimore, MD, January, 2014. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics Vol 8, No 1, January 2018 4 Ways of Relating to the Mathematics of the Past I very quickly began pondering what it really meant to do the history of mathematics and what it meant to be an historian of mathematics. By the time I finished my Ph.D., I could make some distinctions: I could divide historians of mathematics into a mathematician type, such as Zeuthen or van der Waerden, a historian type, like Sabetai Unguru, and, perhaps, a postmodern type (see [28]). These distinctions are useful, but they are also quite crude, especially since the last, the postmodern type, is not in fact a serious option. Later, when I did some work on Edmond Halley's reconstruction of Apollonius' last book of the Conics, I realized that a distinction only between a \mathematician type" and \historian type" could not be the whole picture. In working on Halley's reconstruction, I had to ask what it meant for Halley in 1710, when powerful new mathematical tools were being developed, tools which Halley himself had a part in making and certainly mastered|what it meant then for Halley to turn his attention to a work of ancient mathematics. Although his text was from the past, it was not clear Halley's endeavor could be characterized as purely historical in the modern sense; nor could it be termed as completely unhistorical, like the much earlier attempt to reconstruct Conics, Book VIII by the great Ibn al-Haytham. The more I considered the question the more it became evident not so much that Halley's way of treating ancient Greek mathematical works was sui generis|for it was not|but simply that there are many different kinds of relationships to mathematics of the past. The main goal of this article is to chart out these many relationships. Of course I cannot discuss in depth all the ways one can stand with respect to the mathematics of the past and still keep to a reasonable length. But what I would like to do is to list some of the more important of them, almost as an expanded table of contents. I hope that by doing so I will at least make the value of such a typology of relationships plausible. In particular, I would like to suggest how this kind of typology can form a natural bridge between historiography and history, clarifying on the one hand ways in which one can treat mathematics of the past, while, on the other, clarifying how mathematicians of the past viewed their own sources and their own position with respect to them. As for the latter, the historical side of the equation, I should emphasize I am not looking at the actual relationship between math- ematicians and their sources|a standard task for historians of mathematics. What I am interested in is how those who have concerned themselves with mathematics one way or the other might have viewed the past: I grant the Michael N. Fried 5 line between how texts of the past were used by such people and how they stood with respect to the past can be quite fine, but I believe there is indeed a line. Beyond the immediate goal of setting out this catalog, this paper also has an educational undercurrent. As one interested in the role of history of mathematics in mathematics education, I have long been preoccupied with the questions: What does the mathematics of the past mean to students and what can it mean to them? What should our relationship to the past, as educators, be? Is there a distinct relationship to our mathematical past that might be termed an educational relationship? And, if so, does it sit beside the others as an equal, or perhaps, does it need to be represented on a different axis, a different dimension of the relationships, to use a somewhat hackneyed expression? These are fundamental questions having to do with history of mathematics in mathematics education. Such fundamental issues have been discussed in mathematics education, but hardly enough (see [8] for a review). They are among the issues in the background of the present piece, as I have said, but naturally it would take us too far afield to discuss them at any length or depth here; still, I will describe one possible educational relationship|not necessarily one that I advocate, but one that can focus questions about an educational type. It may be that our job as educators is not to settle upon a fixed educational type, but to assure that questions like those above remain open enough so that our students may honestly consider alternatives and, ultimately, develop their own relationship to the past. Historical and non-historical postures towards mathematics of the past Looking over the totality of relationships or postures towards mathematics of the past, the first and most basic division one should make is between those that are historical and those that are non-historical. It is, actually, not always an easy distinction to make, especially when it comes to mathematics. There is, first, the seductive tendency to think of mathematics, at bottom, as ahistorical, that its true core contains ideas unconditioned by time or place or language. Then there is the seemingly commonsense view that if one speaks about the past at all one is ipso facto engaging in history. The former concerns the nature of mathematics; the latter, the more difficult for us, concerns the nature of history. 6 Ways of Relating to the Mathematics of the Past In this connection, the philosopher and historian Michael Oakeshott's view of the historical mode of experience useful. Oakeshott makes the point that although \History is certainly a form of experience in which what is expe- rienced is, in some sense, past . history is not the only past, and a clear view of the character of the past in history involves the distinction of this past from that in other forms of experience" [21, page 102]. The past that, in Oakeshott's view, stands in clearest contrast to the historical past is what he calls the \practical past" (page 103). This past, like the historical past, is an experience in the present, unavoidably; however, it is a past that is for the sake of the present.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Edmond Halley and His Recurring Comet
    EDMOND HALLEY AND HIS RECURRING COMET “They [the astronomers of the flying island of Laputa] have observed ninety-three different comets and settled their periods with great exactness. If this be true (and they affirm it with great confidence), it is much to be wished that their observations were made public, whereby the theory of comets, which at present is very lame and defective, might be brought into perfection with other parts of astronomy.” — Jonathan Swift, GULLIVER’S TRAVELS, 1726 HDT WHAT? INDEX HALLEY’S COMET EDMOND HALLEY 1656 November 8, Saturday (Old Style): Edmond Halley was born. NEVER READ AHEAD! TO APPRECIATE NOVEMBER 8TH, 1656 AT ALL ONE MUST APPRECIATE IT AS A TODAY (THE FOLLOWING DAY, TOMORROW, IS BUT A PORTION OF THE UNREALIZED FUTURE AND IFFY AT BEST). Edmond Halley “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project HDT WHAT? INDEX HALLEY’S COMET EDMOND HALLEY 1671 February 2, Friday (1671, Old Style): Harvard College was given a “3 foote and a halfe with a concave ey-glasse” reflecting telescope. This would be the instrument with which the Reverends Increase and Cotton Mather would observe a bright comet of the year 1682. ASTRONOMY HALLEY’S COMET HARVARD OBSERVATORY ESSENCE IS BLUR. SPECIFICITY, THE OPPOSITE OF ESSENCE, IS OF THE NATURE OF TRUTH. Edmond Halley “Stack of the Artist of Kouroo” Project HDT WHAT? INDEX HALLEY’S COMET EDMOND HALLEY 1676 Edmond Halley was for six weeks the guest of the British East India Company at their St. Helena colony in the South Atlantic for purposes of observation of the exceedingly rare transit of the planet Venus across the face of the sun.
    [Show full text]
  • Who Invented the Calculus? - and Other 17Th Century Topics Transcript
    Who invented the calculus? - and other 17th century topics Transcript Date: Wednesday, 16 November 2005 - 12:00AM Location: Barnard's Inn Hall WHO INVENTED THE CALCULUS? Professor Robin Wilson Introduction We’ve now covered two-thirds of our journey ‘From Caliphs to Cambridge’, and in this lecture I want to try to survey the mathematical achievements of the seventeenth century – a monumental task. I’ve divided my talk into four parts – first, the movement towards the practical sciences, as exemplified by the founding of Gresham College and the Royal Society. Next, we’ll gravitate towards astronomy, from Copernicus to Newton. Thirdly, we visit France and the gradual movement from geometry to algebra (with a brief excursion into some new approaches to pi) – and finally, the development of the calculus. So first, let’s make an excursion to Gresham College. Practical science The Gresham professorships arose from the will of Sir Thomas Gresham, which provided for £50 per year for each of seven professors to read lectures in Divinity, Astronomy, Music, Geometry, Law, Physic and Rhetoric. As the Ballad of Gresham College later described it: If to be rich and to be learn’d Be every Nation’s cheifest glory, How much are English men concern’d, Gresham to celebrate thy story Who built th’Exchange t’enrich the Citty And a Colledge founded for the witty. From its beginning, Gresham College encouraged the practical sciences, rather than the Aristotelian studies still pursued at the ancient universities: Thy Colledg, Gresham, shall hereafter Be the whole world’s Universitie, Oxford and Cambridge are our laughter; Their learning is but Pedantry.
    [Show full text]
  • Halley, Edmond He Was Assistant of the Secretaries of the Royal Soci- Ety, and from 1685 to 1693 He Edited the Philosoph- Born: November 8, 1656, in Haggerton, UK
    Principia Mathematica, in 1686. From 1685 to 1696 Halley, Edmond he was assistant of the secretaries of the Royal Soci- ety, and from 1685 to 1693 he edited the Philosoph- Born: November 8, 1656, in Haggerton, UK. ical Transactions of the Royal Society. In 1698 he Died: January 14, 1742, in Greenwich, UK. was the frequent guest of Peter the Great, who was studying British shipbuilding in England. He was the Edmond Halley was a major English astronomer, technical adviser to Queen Anne in the War of Span- mathematician, and physicist, who was also ish Succession, and in 1702 and 1703 she sent him interested in demography, insurance mathematics on diplomatic missions to Europe to advise on the (see Actuarial Methods), geology, oceanography, fortification of seaports. geography, and navigation. Moreover, he was Between 1687 and 1720 Halley published papers considered an engineer and a social statistician whose on mathematics, ranging from geometry to the com- life was filled with the thrill of discovery. In 1705, putation of logarithms and trigonometric functions. he reasoned that the periodic comet – now known He also published papers on the computation of as Halley’s comet – that appeared in 1456, 1531, the focal length of thick lenses and on the calcu- 1607, and 1682, was the same comet that appears lation of trajectories in gunnery. In 1684 he studied every 76 years, and accurately predicted that it would tidal phenomena, and in 1686 he wrote an important appear again in December 1758. His most notable paper in geophysics about the trade winds and mon- achievements were his discoveries of the motion of soons.
    [Show full text]
  • The History and Philosophy of Astronomy
    Astronomy 350L (Spring 2005) The History and Philosophy of Astronomy (Lecture 13: Newton I) Instructor: Volker Bromm TA: Amanda Bauer The University of Texas at Austin Isaac Newton: Founding Father of Physics • 1642 (Woolsthorpe) – 1727 (London) • Principia Mathematica Philosophiae Naturalis (“Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy”, 1687) - universal gravity (inverse-square law) - three laws of motion • invented calculus (differentiation and integration) Newton: Timeline and Context Descartes • building upon Galileo, Kepler, and Descartes • completes Copernican Revolution! Newton: Geography of his Life N D 1642: Birth in Woolsthorpe • born in rural Lincolnshire • father died before his birth (‘posthumous child’) 1642 – 49: The English Civil War • bitter struggle between King (Charles I Stuart) and Parliament (“Cavaliers” vs “Roundheads”) • King desires to rule without Parliament 1649: Execution of the King • King Charles I (Stuart) beheaded 1642 – 49: The English Civil War • Victory for Parliament • Republic (“Commonwealth”) • Oliver Cromwell (1599-1658) - Lord Protector • Anarchy after his death • Army recalls son of former (executed) king from exile 1660: The Restoration • Return of the Stuarts: Charles II (son of behead king) London Coffee-House Culture • New venue for meetings of intellectuals The Royal Society of London Gresham College • founded 1660: institution to foster exchange of scientific knowledge Philosophical Transactions • published by Royal Society • first scientific journal • a public registry of new scientific
    [Show full text]
  • Baden Powell (1796–1860), Henry John Stephen Smith (1826–83) and James Joseph Sylvester (1814–97)
    Three Savilian Professors of Geometry dominated Oxford’s mathematical scene during the Victorian era: Baden Powell (1796–1860), Henry John Stephen Smith (1826–83) and James Joseph Sylvester (1814–97). None was primarily a geometer, but each brought a different contribution to the role. Oxford’s Victorian Time-line 1827 Baden Powell elected Savilian Professor 1828 Mathematics Finals papers first Savilian Professors published 1831 Mathematical Scholarships founded 1832 Powell’s lecture on The Present State of Geometry and Future Prospects of Mathematics 1847 BAAS meeting in Oxford 1849 School of Natural Science approved The University Museum, constructed in the late 1850s, realised in brick and iron Oxford’s mid-century aspirations to improve the 1850–52 Royal Commission on Oxford University facilities for teaching mathematics and the sciences. 1853 First college science laboratory 1859–65 Smith’s Reports on the Theory of Numbers 1860 Opening of the University Museum Death of Baden Powell Henry Smith elected Savilian Professor 1861 The ‘Smith normal form’ of a matrix 1867 Smith’s sums of squares 1868 Smith awarded Berlin Academy prize 1871 Non-Anglicans eligible to be members of Oxford University 1874 Smith appointed Keeper of the University Museum 1874–76 Henry Smith becomes President of the London Mathematical Society 1875 Smith’s ‘Cantor set’ 1876 Ferdinand Lindemann visits Oxford Smith’s lecture On the Present State and Prospects of some Branches of Pure Mathematics 1881 French Academy announces Grand Prix competition 1883 Death of Henry Smith J J Sylvester elected Savilian Professor 1885 Sylvester’s inaugural lecture 1888 Oxford Mathematical Society founded 1894 William Esson elected Sylvester’s deputy 1895–97 Smith’s Collected Papers published 1897 Death of J J Sylvester William Esson elected Savilian Professor Oxford’s Victorian Savilian Professors of Geometry Baden Powell Baden Powell was Savilian Professor of Geometry from 1827 to 1860.
    [Show full text]
  • RM Calendar 2013
    Rudi Mathematici x4–8220 x3+25336190 x2–34705209900 x+17825663367369=0 www.rudimathematici.com 1 T (1803) Guglielmo Libri Carucci dalla Sommaja RM132 (1878) Agner Krarup Erlang Rudi Mathematici (1894) Satyendranath Bose (1912) Boris Gnedenko 2 W (1822) Rudolf Julius Emmanuel Clausius (1905) Lev Genrichovich Shnirelman (1938) Anatoly Samoilenko 3 T (1917) Yuri Alexeievich Mitropolsky January 4 F (1643) Isaac Newton RM071 5 S (1723) Nicole-Reine Etable de Labrière Lepaute (1838) Marie Ennemond Camille Jordan Putnam 1998-A1 (1871) Federigo Enriques RM084 (1871) Gino Fano A right circular cone has base of radius 1 and height 3. 6 S (1807) Jozeph Mitza Petzval A cube is inscribed in the cone so that one face of the (1841) Rudolf Sturm cube is contained in the base of the cone. What is the 2 7 M (1871) Felix Edouard Justin Emile Borel side-length of the cube? (1907) Raymond Edward Alan Christopher Paley 8 T (1888) Richard Courant RM156 Scientists and Light Bulbs (1924) Paul Moritz Cohn How many general relativists does it take to change a (1942) Stephen William Hawking light bulb? 9 W (1864) Vladimir Adreievich Steklov Two. One holds the bulb, while the other rotates the (1915) Mollie Orshansky universe. 10 T (1875) Issai Schur (1905) Ruth Moufang Mathematical Nursery Rhymes (Graham) 11 F (1545) Guidobaldo del Monte RM120 Fiddle de dum, fiddle de dee (1707) Vincenzo Riccati A ring round the Moon is ̟ times D (1734) Achille Pierre Dionis du Sejour But if a hole you want repaired 12 S (1906) Kurt August Hirsch You use the formula ̟r 2 (1915) Herbert Ellis Robbins RM156 13 S (1864) Wilhelm Karl Werner Otto Fritz Franz Wien (1876) Luther Pfahler Eisenhart The future science of government should be called “la (1876) Erhard Schmidt cybernétique” (1843 ).
    [Show full text]
  • LRB · Steven Shapin · Saili
    LRB · Steven Shapin · Sailing Scientist (print version) http://www.lrb.co.uk/v20/n13/steven-shapin/sailing-scientist/print Back to Article page Sailing Scientist Steven Shapin Edmond Halley: Charting the Heavens and the Seas by Alan Cook Oxford, 540 pp, £29.50, December 1997, ISBN 0 19 850031 9 Joined for all time on the title-page of the Book that Made the Modern World are Isaac Newton (who wrote the Principia Mathematica) and Samuel Pepys (who, as President of the Royal Society, licensed it to be printed). It is one of the oddest couples in the history of thought: the man who, as a late 17th-century Cambridge student was heard to say, had ‘writt a book that neither he nor any body else understands’ and one of the multitude who understood scarcely a word of it; the wholly other and the all-too-human; the virgin ascetic who accused John Locke of trying to ‘embroil’ him with women, and the supreme London boulevardier whose consuming passions included Château Haut-Brion, the theatre and serial embroilments with women. Turn the page and the odd couple is joined by a third, for here appears the name of the astronomer Edmond Halley (1656-1742) – the midwife to modernity. Halley it was who pressed Newton to write the book, who saw it through the press and corrected the sheets, who paid for its publication out of his own pocket, and who prepared a précis for personal presentation to the King – one of the earliest scientific soundbites. ‘But for him, in all human probability’, wrote Augustus de Morgan in the mid-19th century, the Principia ‘would not have been thought of, nor when thought of written, nor when written printed’.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Important Historical Names, Dates,* and Events
    Some Important Historical Names, Dates,* and Events MATHEMATICAL GENERAL Early Beginnings (Before the Sixth Century B.C.) B.C. 30,000 Notched wolf bone B.C. 3300 Menes unites Egypt 8000 Ishango bone 2600 Great Pyramid at Gizeh 2500 Table tablets from Nippur 2100 Code of Hammurabi 1900 Plimpton 322 1500 Phoenician alphabet 1850 Moscow Papyrus 1200 Trojan War 1650 Rhind Papyrus 700 Homer: The Odyssey Classical Period (Sixth Century B.C. to Fifth Century) B.C. 622-547 Thales of Miletus B.C. 558-486 Darius the Great 585-500 Pythagoras of Samos 485-430 Herodotus ca. 470 Theodorus of Cyrene 480 Battle of Thermopylae 460-380 Hippocrates of Chios 469-399 Socrates ca. 420 Hippias of Elis 431 Peloponnesian War 408-355 Euxodus of Cnidos 388 Plato founds Academy 323-285 Euclid 356-323 Alexander the Great 287-212 Archimedes ca. 370 Eudemus of Rhodes 262-190 Apollonius of Perga 331 Foundation of Alexandria ca. 240 Nicomedes 213 Books burned in China ca. 230 Eratosthenes of Cyrene 212 Fall of Syracuse to Romans A.D. ca. 75 Heron of Alexandria 195 Rosetta Stone engraved ca. 100 Nicomachus of Gerasa 106-43 Cicero 85-160 Claudius Ptolemy 44 Assassination of Caesar ca. 250 Diophantus 27 Beginning of Roman Empire ca. 260 Liu Hui A.D. 100 Paper made in China ca. 300 Pappus of Alexandria 272-337 Constantine the Great 365-395 Theon of Alexandria 286 Division of the Empire / d. 415 Hypatia 324 Constantinople founded 410-485 Proclus 455 Vandals sack Rome *Most dates before 600 B.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Rudi Mathematici
    Rudi Mathematici 4 3 2 x -8176x +25065656x -34150792256x+17446960811280=0 Rudi Mathematici January 1 1 M (1803) Guglielmo LIBRI Carucci dalla Somaja (1878) Agner Krarup ERLANG (1894) Satyendranath BOSE 18º USAMO (1989) - 5 (1912) Boris GNEDENKO 2 M (1822) Rudolf Julius Emmanuel CLAUSIUS Let u and v real numbers such that: (1905) Lev Genrichovich SHNIRELMAN (1938) Anatoly SAMOILENKO 8 i 9 3 G (1917) Yuri Alexeievich MITROPOLSHY u +10 ∗u = (1643) Isaac NEWTON i=1 4 V 5 S (1838) Marie Ennemond Camille JORDAN 10 (1871) Federigo ENRIQUES = vi +10 ∗ v11 = 8 (1871) Gino FANO = 6 D (1807) Jozeph Mitza PETZVAL i 1 (1841) Rudolf STURM Determine -with proof- which of the two numbers 2 7 M (1871) Felix Edouard Justin Emile BOREL (1907) Raymond Edward Alan Christopher PALEY -u or v- is larger (1888) Richard COURANT 8 T There are only two types of people in the world: (1924) Paul Moritz COHN (1942) Stephen William HAWKING those that don't do math and those that take care of them. 9 W (1864) Vladimir Adreievich STELKOV 10 T (1875) Issai SCHUR (1905) Ruth MOUFANG A mathematician confided 11 F (1545) Guidobaldo DEL MONTE That a Moebius strip is one-sided (1707) Vincenzo RICCATI You' get quite a laugh (1734) Achille Pierre Dionis DU SEJOUR If you cut it in half, 12 S (1906) Kurt August HIRSCH For it stay in one piece when divided. 13 S (1864) Wilhelm Karl Werner Otto Fritz Franz WIEN (1876) Luther Pfahler EISENHART (1876) Erhard SCHMIDT A mathematician's reputation rests on the number 3 14 M (1902) Alfred TARSKI of bad proofs he has given.
    [Show full text]
  • Projectile Problem
    Projectile problem A projectile is fired with angle of elevation α and initial velocity v0. Assuming that air resistance is negligible and the only external force is due to gravity, find the position function r(t) of the projectile. What value of maximizes the range (the horizontal distance traveled)? 1 2 Solution r(t) = − gt j + tv0 2 1 2 If v0 = v0 cos(α)i + v0 sin(α)j, then r(t) = v0 cos(α)ti + v0 sin(α)t − gt j. 2 Velocity v(t) = v0 cos(α)i + (v0 sin(α) − gt)j. When the projectile reaches the highest point, the vertical velocity is zero so the time is T1 = v0 sin(α)=g. When the projectile hits the ground (impact time), the vertical position is 0 so T2 = 2v0 sin(α)=g = 2T1. And the range is the horizontal part of 2 2 r(T2) = 2v0 sin(α) cos(α)=g = (v0 =g) sin(2α). That is at maximum if 2α = π=2, or α = π=4. Example. (Page 894 problem 23) A projectile is fired with an initial speed of 200m=s and angle of elevation 60◦. Find (a) the range of the projectile, (b) the maximum height reached, and (c) the speed at impact. Story of Tycho Brahe, Johannes Kepler and Issac Newton Tycho Brahe (1546-1601), Johannes Kepler (1571-1630), Isaac Newton (1642-1727) A paradigmatic account of the uses of mathematics in the natural sciences comes, in deliberately oversimplified fashion, from the classic sequence of Brahe, Kepler, Newton: observed facts, patterns that give coherence to the observations, fundamental laws that explain the patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • EDMOND HALLEY (November 8, 1656 – January 25, 1742) by HEINZ KLAUS STRICK, Germany
    EDMOND HALLEY (November 8, 1656 – January 25, 1742) by HEINZ KLAUS STRICK, Germany EDMOND HALLEY was born the son of a wealthy soap manufacturer near London. Although the father lost a large part of his fortune in the devastating fire of 1666, he was able to finance a good education for his son. At the age of 15, he was already building sundials and studying the fluctuations of the earth's magnetic field. Contemporary sources claim that his knowledge of the starry sky was so extensive that he would have noticed immediately if the position of any star in the sky had changed. At the age of 17 HALLEY entered Queen's College, Oxford. When he was 20 years old, he published an article on an occultation of Mars by the moon. When the opportunity arose he interrupted his studies in Oxford and at the newly opened observatory in Greenwich, to travel to St Helena, the British territory in the Atlantic Ocean. There he produced the first catalogue of the stars of the southern night sky with the exact positions of 341 stars. He was also the first astronomer to measure the transit of the planet Mercury in front of the Sun and, using KEPLER's 3rd law (the squares of the orbital periods of the planets are proportional to the third power of the average distance from the Sun) he determined the distance of the Earth to the Sun. Returning to Oxford, HALLEY graduated without taking exams and at 22 became the youngest member of the Royal Society. The following year the Royal Society sent him to Gdansk to settle a dispute between the 68-year- old astronomer JOHANNES HEVELIUS and ROBERT HOOKE.
    [Show full text]
  • Throughout the 18Th Century Oxford Was Central in the Development of Newtonian Philosophy. Edmond Halley, the Most Famous Englis
    Throughout the 18th century Oxford was central in the development of Newtonian philosophy. Edmond Halley, the most famous English astronomer of his day, was Oxford’s Savilian Professor of Geometry. Thomas Hornsby, Sedleian Professor of Natural Philosophy, founded the Radcliffe Observatory. Oxford Mathematics from Halley to Hornsby Time-line 1656 Edmond Halley born in London 1673 Halley enters The Queen’s College, Oxford 1676–78 Halley’s expedition to map the skies of the southern hemisphere 1678 Oxford University grants Halley his MA degree by Royal Mandamus 1687 Publication of Isaac Newton’s Principia Mathematica 1704 Halley appointed Savilian Professor of Geometry 1705 Halley publishes his cometary researches 1710 Halley’s edition of Apollonius’s Conics 1717 James Stirling’s book on Isaac Newton’s classification of cubics 1720 Halley appointed Astronomer Royal 1721 James Bradley appointed Savilian Professor of Astronomy 1742 Halley dies in Greenwich and Nathaniel Bliss is appointed as his successor to the Savilian Chair 1763 Thomas Hornsby is appointed Savilian Professor of Astronomy 1764 Bliss dies and Joseph Betts is appointed as his successor 1766 Betts dies and John Smith is appointed as his successor 1782 Thomas Hornsby is appointed Sedleian Professor of Natural Philosophy 1797 Smith dies and Abraham Robertson is appointed as his successor The Radcliffe Observatory, built in the 1770s at the instigation of 1810 Hornsby dies and Robertson succeeds him as Savilian Professor Thomas Hornsby, was the first academic establishment in Europe of Astronomy to combine teaching and original research in astronomy. George Cooke succeeds Hornsby as Sedleian Professor of Natural Philosophy Oxford Mathematics from Halley to Hornsby Edmond Halley in Oxford In 1704 Edmond Halley succeeded John Wallis as Savilian Professor of Geometry and remained in post until his death in 1742.
    [Show full text]