Interspecific Combat Between Nymphargus Aff. Grandisonae and Espadarana Prosoblepon (Anura, Centrolenidae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Interspecific Combat Between Nymphargus Aff. Grandisonae and Espadarana Prosoblepon (Anura, Centrolenidae) Herpetology Notes, volume 10: 283-285 (2017) (published online on 29 May 2017) Interspecific combat between Nymphargus aff. grandisonae and Espadarana prosoblepon (Anura, Centrolenidae) Anton Sorokin1,* and Emma Steigerwald2 There are approximately 150 species composing the are considered derived, as they are not seen in any other family Centrolenidae, commonly referred to as the frogs (Guayasamin et al., 2009). There are two classes glassfrogs (Frost, 2016). Though principally arboreal, of combat grasps, described as the primitive and derived during breeding season they descend to riparian habitat, states. In the primitive state, males are positioned in a mating epiphyllously and typically depositing eggs on back-to-venter, or amplexus-like, position. In contrast, vegetation overhanging the water (Guayasamin et al., in the derived state, males hang from vegetation by 2009). During breeding season, some glassfrog species their hind limbs, clasping each other venter-to-venter engage in male-to-male combat as they defend their (Bolivar et al., 1999). territories from conspecifics (Hutter et al., 2013). On 15 We provide the first observation of interspecific November 2014, at roughly 2100h, we observed a male combat between glassfrog species Nymphargus aff. Nymphargus aff. grandisonae (Cochran and Goin, 1970) grandisonae and Espadarana prosoblepon. To the on an upper leaf engaged in amplexus-like combat with best of our knowledge, our observation is also the first a male Espadarana prosoblepon (Boettger, 1892) on a record of any interspecific combat in Centrolenidae. lower leaf (Fig. 1). The animals were hanging above a Espadarana prosoblepon cooccurs with N. grandisonae stream in Buenaventura Reserve in El Oro Province, across the latter’s range. Though N. grandisonae inhabits Ecuador. The observation took place at 3.6350°S, a higher elevational band than E. prosoblepon, they 79.7490°W, WGS 84, 1040 m a.s.l. We detected overlap significantly (Amphibiaweb, 2016) and appear neither eggs nor females nearby. The individuals did to share similar habitat requirements. Nymphargus aff. not vocalize or inflate their vocal sacs at any time grandisonae and N. grandisonae are very closely related during the observation, which lasted approximately 10 species, and it can reasonably be expected that their minutes. Though unconfirmed, it is possible that the N. behavior is similar. The ranges of N. aff. grandisonae aff. grandisonae was using his humeral spines. Neither and E. prosoblepon also overlap, and the elevational animal was visibly injured after separation. range of N. aff. grandisonae is nested within that of E. Among frogs, combat is not unique to centrolenids. prosoblepon (Szekely pers comm. 2016). It remains Frog species from many lineages combat with unclear how often glassfrogs interact interspecifically, conspecifics to defend their territory, protecting their potentially competing for scarce suitable riparian share of limited resources and reproductive opportunities vegetation. Better understanding how and with whom (Wells, 1977). They may fight to defend a preferred glassfrogs engage in combat could elucidate niche oviposition site, or a preferred site for broadcasting partitioning in their complex neotropical ecosystems. their call to potential mates (Toledo and Haddad, 2005; Combat is sparsely documented in Centrolenidae. Vilaça et al., 2011; Wells, 1977). However, the combat Most of what we know comes from anecdotal reports in behaviours observed in certain species of centrolenids 11 species (Rojas-Runjaic and Cabello, 2011). Bolivar et al. (1999) hypothesized that combat behaviour could be used as a taxonomic character for this family, allowing for the discrimination of constituent species by subfamily. In this initial conception, “derived” combat 1 Department of Biology, East Carolina University, NC, USA. 2 Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and behaviour was the ancestral state for the family, and only Management, University of California Berkeley, CA, USA. the subfamily Hyalinobatrachinae engaged in primitive * Corresponding author e-mail: [email protected] combat (Guayasamin et al., 2009). Therefore, when both 284 Anton Sorokin & Emma Steigerwald Figure 1. Nymphargus aff. grandisonae grips Espadarana prosoblepon in a primitive combat state in Buenaventura Reserve, Ecuador (A and B). Photos by Anton Sorokin. primitive and derived combat were described (Rojas- Acknowledgements. We are grateful to Paul & Diana Szekely for Runjaic and Cabello, 2011) in Centrolene daidaleum, their helpful suggestions and edits. these observations contradicted the standing hypothesis. The hypothesis was further attenuated two years later by References similar observations (Hutter et al., 2013) in Nymphargus Amphibia Web: Information on amphibian biology and conservation. grandisonae. Our observation corroborates Hutter et (2016): [Web application]. AmphibiaWeb, Berkeley. Available al. (2013) in finding Nymphargus aff. grandisonae, a at www.amphibiaweb.org. Last accessed December 2016 close relative of N. grandisonae, engaged in primitive- Bolivar, W.G., Grant, T., Osorio, L.A. (1999): Combat behavior state combat behavior. As suggested by Rojas-Runjaic in Centrolene buckleyi and other Centrolenid frogs. Alytes: and Cabello (2011), the initial combat-systematics International Journal of Batrachology 16(3–4): 77–83. Frost, D.R. (2016): Amphibian Species of the World: an Online hypothesis was based on anecdotal observations from Reference. Version 6.0 (24 March 2017). Electronic Database a small fraction of glassfrog diversity. Data more accessible at http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/ comprehensively representative of centrolenid diversity index.html. American Museum of Natural History, New York, will be required to understand the value of combat USA. behaviour for informing systematics and phylogeny. Guayasamin, J.M., Castroviejo-Fisher, S., Trueb, L., Ayarzagüena, J., Rada, M., Vilà, C. (2009): Phylogenetic systematics of Glassfrogs (Amphibia: Centrolenidae) and their sister taxon Allophryne ruthveni. Zootaxa 2100: 1–97. Combat between Nymphargus aff. grandisonae and Espadarana prosoblepon 285 Hutter, C.R., Esobar-Lasso, S., Rojas-Morales, J.A., David, P., Gutiérrez-Cárdenas, A., Imba, H., Guayasamin, J.M. (2013): The territoriality, vocalizations and aggressive interactions of the red-spotted glassfrog, Nymphargus grandisonae, Cochran and Goin, 1970 (Anura: Centrolenidae). Journal of Natural History 47: 47–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2013.792961 Rojas-Runjaic, F.J.M., Cabello, P. (2011): A glassfrog with primitive and derived combat behavior. Zootaxa 2833: 60–64. Toledo, L.F., Haddad, C.F.B. (2005): Reproductive biology of Scinax fuscomarginatus (Anura, Hylidae) in south-eastern Brazil. Journal of Natural History 39(32): 3029–3037. https:// doi.org/10.1080/00222930500221403 Vilaça, T. R. A., Silva, J. R. do S., & Solé, M. (2011): Vocalization and territorial behaviour of Phyllomedusa nordestina Caramaschi, 2006 (Anura: Hylidae) from southern Bahia, Brazil. Journal of Natural History 45: 29–30. https://doi.org/10. 1080/00222933.2011.561018 Wells, K. D. (1977): The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. Animal Behavior, 25: 666–693. Accepted by Igor Kaefer.
Recommended publications
  • A Collection of Amphibians from Río San Juan, Southeastern Nicaragua
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/264789493 A collection of amphibians from Río San Juan, southeastern Nicaragua Article in Herpetology Notes · January 2009 CITATIONS READS 12 188 4 authors, including: Javier Sunyer Matthias Dehling University of Canterbury 89 PUBLICATIONS 209 CITATIONS 54 PUBLICATIONS 967 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Gunther Köhler Senckenberg Research Institute 222 PUBLICATIONS 1,617 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Zoological Research in Strict Forest Reserves in Hesse, Germany View project Diploma Thesis View project All content following this page was uploaded by Javier Sunyer on 16 August 2018. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. Herpetology Notes, volume 2: 189-202 (2009) (published online on 29 October 2009) A collection of amphibians from Río San Juan, southeastern Nicaragua Javier Sunyer1,2,3*, Guillermo Páiz4, David Matthias Dehling1, Gunther Köhler1 Abstract. We report upon the amphibians collected during seven expeditions carried out between the years 2000–2006 to thirteen localities in both Refugio de Vida Silvestre Río San Juan and Reserva Biológica Indio-Maíz, southeastern Nicaragua. We include morphometric data of around one-half of the adult specimens in the collection, and provide a brief general overview and discuss zoogeographic and conservation considerations of the amphibians known to occur in the Río San Juan area. Keywords. Amphibia, conservation, ecology, morphometry, zoogeography. Introduction potential of holding America’s first interoceanic channel and also because it was part of the sea route to travel The San Juan River is an approximately 200 km slow- from eastern to western United States.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of the Amphibians of Venezuela: Illustrated and Annotated Species List, Distribution, and Conservation 1,2César L
    Mannophryne vulcano, Male carrying tadpoles. El Ávila (Parque Nacional Guairarepano), Distrito Federal. Photo: Jose Vieira. We want to dedicate this work to some outstanding individuals who encouraged us, directly or indirectly, and are no longer with us. They were colleagues and close friends, and their friendship will remain for years to come. César Molina Rodríguez (1960–2015) Erik Arrieta Márquez (1978–2008) Jose Ayarzagüena Sanz (1952–2011) Saúl Gutiérrez Eljuri (1960–2012) Juan Rivero (1923–2014) Luis Scott (1948–2011) Marco Natera Mumaw (1972–2010) Official journal website: Amphibian & Reptile Conservation amphibian-reptile-conservation.org 13(1) [Special Section]: 1–198 (e180). Catalogue of the amphibians of Venezuela: Illustrated and annotated species list, distribution, and conservation 1,2César L. Barrio-Amorós, 3,4Fernando J. M. Rojas-Runjaic, and 5J. Celsa Señaris 1Fundación AndígenA, Apartado Postal 210, Mérida, VENEZUELA 2Current address: Doc Frog Expeditions, Uvita de Osa, COSTA RICA 3Fundación La Salle de Ciencias Naturales, Museo de Historia Natural La Salle, Apartado Postal 1930, Caracas 1010-A, VENEZUELA 4Current address: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Río Grande do Sul (PUCRS), Laboratório de Sistemática de Vertebrados, Av. Ipiranga 6681, Porto Alegre, RS 90619–900, BRAZIL 5Instituto Venezolano de Investigaciones Científicas, Altos de Pipe, apartado 20632, Caracas 1020, VENEZUELA Abstract.—Presented is an annotated checklist of the amphibians of Venezuela, current as of December 2018. The last comprehensive list (Barrio-Amorós 2009c) included a total of 333 species, while the current catalogue lists 387 species (370 anurans, 10 caecilians, and seven salamanders), including 28 species not yet described or properly identified. Fifty species and four genera are added to the previous list, 25 species are deleted, and 47 experienced nomenclatural changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Limits, and Evolutionary History of Glassfrogs
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athematical representation is inevitably simplistic, and occasionally one has to be brutal in forcing it to suit a reality that can only be very complex. And yet, there is a beauty about trees because of the simplicity with which they allow you to describe a series of events […]. But one must ask whether one is justified simplifying reality to the extent necessary to represent it as a tree. Cavalli-Sforza, Genes, People, and Languages (2001) The universe is no narrow thing and the order within it is not constrained by any latitude in is conception to repeat what exists in one part in any other part. Even in this world more things exist
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on the Natural History of Three Glass Frogs Species (Anura: Centrolenidae) from the Andean Central Cordillera of Colombia*
    BOLETÍN CIENTÍFICO ISSN 0123 - 3068 bol.cient.mus.hist.nat. 17 (2), julio - diciembre, 2013. 127 - 140 CENTRO DE MUSEOS MUSEO DE HISTORIA NATURAL NOTES ON THE NATURAL HISTORY OF THREE GLASS FROGS SPECIES (ANURA: CENTROLENIDAE) FROM THE ANDEAN CENTRAL CORDILLERA OF COLOMBIA* Julián Andrés Rojas-Morales1*;and Sergio Escobar-Lasso2 Abstract Between October 2008 and December 2010, we carried out surveys in different creeks at north of the municipality of Manizales in the Colombian Central Cordillera, in order to make observations on the natural history of three glass frogs species (Centrolene quindianum, Nymphargus grandisonae and N. spilotus). Centrolene quindianum presents clutches with 33–35 eggs (N= 2) located on the Upper of leaves at heights between 40–200 cm above water; one male was observed close to three egg-masses (< 1 m of distance of them in the same perch), suggesting the possibility of parental care. The spider Patrera armata (Anyphaenidae) is reported as a predator of the embryos of this species. In N. grandisonae both calling and oviposition occurs in the upper surfaces of large leaves, especially Araceas and Heliconias. These breeding sites are guarded territories by males for periods of up to six months. Their egg-masses have an average of 74 eggs (N = 4), located at a height and a distance from the edge of creeks between 57–218 cm (X = 113.21 ± 45.73 cm, N = 14) and 0–35 cm (X = 15.8 ± 6.7 cm, N = 14), respectively; males stay close to egg masses as they continue calling to attract females. In addition, we report for first timefly larvae (Drosophylidae) as parasitoid agent foregg-masses of N.grandisonae.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuevos Datos De Distribución De Ranas De Cristal (Amphibia: Centrolenidae) En El Oriente De Ecuador, Con Comentarios Sobre La Diversidad En La Región
    AVANCES EN CIENCIAS E INGENIERÍAS ARTÍCULO/ARTICLE SECCIÓN/SECTION B Nuevos datos de distribución de ranas de cristal (Amphibia: Centrolenidae) en el oriente de Ecuador, con comentarios sobre la diversidad en la región Mario H. Yánez-Muñoz1∗, Paúl Meza-Ramos1,2, H. Mauricio Ortega-Andrade1,3 J. Jairo Mueses-Cisneros4, Marco Reyes P.1,5, Juan P. Reyes P.1,5, Juan Carlos Durán L.2 1 Museo Ecuatoriano de Ciencias Naturales, División de Herpetología Calle Rumipamba 341 y Av. de Los Shyris. Casilla Postal 17-07-8976, Quito, Ecuador 2 PETROECUADOR, Vicepresidencia Corporativa de Ambiente, Responsabilidad Social, Seguridad y Salud, Coordinación, Mitigación y Remediación Ambiental. Iñaquito y Juan Pablo Sánz (Edificio Cámara de la Construcción), Quito, Ecuador 3 Instituto de Ecología, A.C. km 2,5 carretera antigua Coatepec 351, AP63, Xalapa, Veracruz, México 4 Investigador Independiente. Calle 11 # 4-96, Barrio Central, Colón Putumayo, Colombia. 5 Fundación Oscar Efrén Reyes, Calle 12 de Noviembre No 270 y Luis A. Martínez, Baños, Tungurahua, Ecuador ∗ Autor principal/Corresponding author, e-mail: [email protected] Editado por/Edited by: D. F. Cisneros-Heredia, M.Sc. Recibido/Received: 02/02/2010. Aceptado/Accepted: 07/25/2010. Publicado en línea/Published on Web: 12/08/2010. Impreso/Printed: 12/08/2010. Abstract We present new information on the latitudinal and altitudinal distribution of five species of recently-described or poorly-known glassfrogs from eastern Ecuador. We include novel data on its body size and natural history. Information on the diversity and biogeography of the centrolenid frogs of Eastern Ecuador is discussed, finding them associated with six ve- getation formations distributed between the eastern Andean slopes and lowland Amazonia.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Functions of Neotropical Amphibians and Reptiles: a Review
    Univ. Sci. 2015, Vol. 20 (2): 229-245 doi: 10.11144/Javeriana.SC20-2.efna Freely available on line REVIEW ARTICLE Ecological functions of neotropical amphibians and reptiles: a review Cortés-Gomez AM1, Ruiz-Agudelo CA2 , Valencia-Aguilar A3, Ladle RJ4 Abstract Amphibians and reptiles (herps) are the most abundant and diverse vertebrate taxa in tropical ecosystems. Nevertheless, little is known about their role in maintaining and regulating ecosystem functions and, by extension, their potential value for supporting ecosystem services. Here, we review research on the ecological functions of Neotropical herps, in different sources (the bibliographic databases, book chapters, etc.). A total of 167 Neotropical herpetology studies published over the last four decades (1970 to 2014) were reviewed, providing information on more than 100 species that contribute to at least five categories of ecological functions: i) nutrient cycling; ii) bioturbation; iii) pollination; iv) seed dispersal, and; v) energy flow through ecosystems. We emphasize the need to expand the knowledge about ecological functions in Neotropical ecosystems and the mechanisms behind these, through the study of functional traits and analysis of ecological processes. Many of these functions provide key ecosystem services, such as biological pest control, seed dispersal and water quality. By knowing and understanding the functions that perform the herps in ecosystems, management plans for cultural landscapes, restoration or recovery projects of landscapes that involve aquatic and terrestrial systems, development of comprehensive plans and detailed conservation of species and ecosystems may be structured in a more appropriate way. Besides information gaps identified in this review, this contribution explores these issues in terms of better understanding of key questions in the study of ecosystem services and biodiversity and, also, of how these services are generated.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    Phyllomedusa 19(1):83–92, 2020 © 2020 Universidade de São Paulo - ESALQ ISSN 1519-1397 (print) / ISSN 2316-9079 (online) doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9079.v19i1p83-92 Causes of embryonic mortality in Espadarana prosoblepon (Anura: Centrolenidae) from Costa Rica Johana Goyes Vallejos1,2 and Karim Ramirez-Soto3 1 Biodiversity Institute, University of Kansas. Lawrence, KS 66045, USA. 2 Current address: Division of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri. Columbia, MO 65211, USA. E-mail: goyes. [email protected]. 3 Glendale Community College. Glendale, AZ 85302, USA. Abstract Causes of embryonic mortality in Espadarana prosoblepon (Anura: Centrolenidae) from Costa Rica. Members of the family Centrolenidae—commonly known as “glass frogs”—exhibit arboreal egg-laying behavior, depositing their clutches on riparian vegetation. Few studies have investigated specifc causes of mortality during embryonic stages, perhaps the most vulnerable stage during the anuran life cycle. The Emerald Glass Frog, Espadarana prosoblepon, was used as a case study to investigate the causes of embryonic mortality in a species with short-term (i.e., less than 1 day) parental care. The specifc sources of mortality of eggs of E. prosoblepon were quantifed and overall rates of survival (hatching success) were estimated. Nineteen egg clutches were transferred from permanent outside enclosures to the wild. Clutch development was monitored daily until hatching; fve mortality causes were quantifed: desiccation, failure to develop, fungal infection, predation, and “rain-stripped.” The main causes of mortality were predation (often by katydids and wasps) and embryos stripped from the leaf during heavy rains. The results were compared to those of previous studies of centrolenids exhibiting parental care, and discussed in the context of the importance of the natural history data for these frogs with regard to understanding the evolutionary history of parental care in glass frogs.
    [Show full text]
  • Guía De Identificación De Anfibios Y Reptiles-La Favorita
    Serie de Publicaciones Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad. Guías Rápidas de Campo Nro.1. GUÍA DE IDENTIFICACIÓN DE ANFIBIOS Y REPTILES COMUNES DE LA ESTACIÓN EXPERIMENTAL “LA FAVORITA” Carolina Reyes-Puig, Paúl A. Meza-Ramos, Manuel R. Dueñas, Patricia Bejarano-Muñoz, Salomón M. Ramírez-Jaramillo, Juan P. Reyes-Puig y Mario H. Yánez-Muñoz 2015 GUÍA DE IDENTIFICACIÓN DE ANFIBIOS Y REPTILES COMUNES DE LA ESTACIÓN EXPERIMENTAL “LA FAVORITA”. ©2015. Serie de Publicaciones Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad. Guías Rápidas de Campo Nro.1. Todos los derechos están reservados. Esta publicación debe ser citada de la siguiente manera: REYES-PUIG, C., MEZA-RAMOS, P. A., DUEÑAS, M. R., BEJARANO-MUÑOZ, P., RAMÍREZ-JARAMILLO S. M., REYES- PUIG, J. P. y YÁNEZ-MUÑOZ, M. H. 2015. Guía de Identificación de Anfibios y Reptiles Comunes de la Estación Experimental “La Favorita”. Serie de Publicaciones Museo Ecuatoriano de Ciencias Naturales del Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad (INB- MECN). Guías Rápidas de Campo Nro.1. Quito-Ecuador. Editor de la serie: Mario H. Yánez-Muñoz. Comité editorial: Fernando Rodríguez, Ph.D. Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad Ecuador H. Mauricio Ortega-Andrade, Ph.D. (c) Instituto de Ecología, A.C. México Lic. Juan Carlos Sánchez Universidad del Azuay Ecuador Créditos fotográficos: Patricia Bejarano-Muñoz (PBM), Manuel R. Dueñas (MRD), Paúl Meza-Ramos (PMR), Carolina Reyes-Puig (CRP) y Mario H. Yánez-Muñoz (MYM). Corrección de Estilo: Hipsy Cifuentes (MECN-INB) Diseño y Diagramación Francisco Mosquera J. (MECN-INB) Tiraje:
    [Show full text]
  • Skin Bacterial Diversity of Panamanian Frogs Is Associated with Host Susceptibility and Presence of Batrachochytrium Dendrobatidis
    The ISME Journal (2016) 10, 1682–1695 © 2016 International Society for Microbial Ecology All rights reserved 1751-7362/16 www.nature.com/ismej ORIGINAL ARTICLE Skin bacterial diversity of Panamanian frogs is associated with host susceptibility and presence of Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis Eria A Rebollar1, Myra C Hughey2, Daniel Medina2, Reid N Harris1, Roberto Ibáñez3 and Lisa K Belden2,3 1Department of Biology, James Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA, USA; 2Department of Biological Sciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA and 3Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama City, Panama Symbiotic bacteria on amphibian skin can inhibit growth of the fungus Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis (Bd) that has caused dramatic population declines and extinctions of amphibians in the Neotropics. It remains unclear how the amphibians’ skin microbiota is influenced by environmental bacterial reservoirs, host-associated factors such as susceptibility to pathogens, and pathogen presence in tropical amphibians. We sampled skin bacteria from five co-occurring frog species that differ in Bd susceptibility at one Bd-naive site, and sampled one of the non-susceptible species from Bd-endemic and Bd-naive sites in Panama. We hypothesized that skin bacterial communities (1) would be distinct from the surrounding environment regardless of the host habitat, (2) would differ between Bd susceptible and non-susceptible species and (3) would differ on hosts in Bd-naive and Bd-endemic sites. We found that skin bacterial communities were enriched in bacterial taxa that had low relative abundances in the environment. Non-susceptible species had very similar skin bacterial communities that were enriched in particular taxa such as the genera Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter.
    [Show full text]
  • “Cochranella” Megista (Anura: Centrolenidae) and Frst Records for Ecuador
    Phyllomedusa 20(1):27–35, 2021 © 2021 Universidade de São Paulo - ESALQ ISSN 1519-1397 (print) / ISSN 2316-9079 (online) doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/issn.2316-9079.v20i1p27-35 Phylogenetic position of the glassfrog “Cochranella” megista (Anura: Centrolenidae) and frst records for Ecuador Scott J. Trageser,1 Ross J. Maynard,1 Jaime Culebras,2 Sebastian Kohn,3,4 Amanda Quezada,5,6 and Juan M. Guayasamin7 1 The Biodiversity Group, Tucson, AZ, USA. E-mail: [email protected]. 2 Photo Wildlife Tours, Quito, Ecuador. 3 Fundación Cóndor Andino, Quito, Ecuador. 4 Fundación EcoMinga, Quito, Ecuador. 5 Tropical Herping, Quito, Ecuador. 6 Universidad del Azuay, Museo de Zoología. 24 de Mayo 7-77, Cuenca, Azuay, Ecuador. 7 Universidad San Francisco de Quito - USFQ, Colegio de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales COCIBA, Instituto BIOSFERA- USFQ, Laboratorio de Biología Evolutiva, Campus Cumbayá. Casilla Postal 17-1200-841, Quito 170901, Ecuador. Abstract Phylogenetic position of “Cochranella” megista (Anura: Centrolenidae) and frst records for Ecuador. “Cochranella” megista is an Endangered and rarely encountered species of glass frog that, until now, had been only registered in the Colombian Andes. ere e report tis species for te first time in cador epandin its non distribtion ca. 530 km south of its original range. Additionally, we include C. megista in a molecular poen for te first time and nambios pace te species in te ens Nymphargus, resulting in a new combination. Habitat in both countries is fragmented and is threatened by mining concessions and agriculture. Keywords: Amphibians, conservation, Greater Andean Glassfrog, Nymphargus, Río Manduriacu Reserve, threatened species.
    [Show full text]
  • Hand and Foot Musculature of Anura: Structure, Homology, Terminology, and Synapomorphies for Major Clades
    HAND AND FOOT MUSCULATURE OF ANURA: STRUCTURE, HOMOLOGY, TERMINOLOGY, AND SYNAPOMORPHIES FOR MAJOR CLADES BORIS L. BLOTTO, MARTÍN O. PEREYRA, TARAN GRANT, AND JULIÁN FAIVOVICH BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY HAND AND FOOT MUSCULATURE OF ANURA: STRUCTURE, HOMOLOGY, TERMINOLOGY, AND SYNAPOMORPHIES FOR MAJOR CLADES BORIS L. BLOTTO Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; División Herpetología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”–CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina MARTÍN O. PEREYRA División Herpetología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”–CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Laboratorio de Genética Evolutiva “Claudio J. Bidau,” Instituto de Biología Subtropical–CONICET, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas Químicas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Misiones, Posadas, Misiones, Argentina TARAN GRANT Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Coleção de Anfíbios, Museu de Zoologia, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil; Research Associate, Herpetology, Division of Vertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History JULIÁN FAIVOVICH División Herpetología, Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”–CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Departamento de Biodiversidad y Biología Experimental, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Research Associate, Herpetology, Division of Vertebrate Zoology, American
    [Show full text]
  • Differences in the Diversity of Frogspecies Between Sierra Lloronaand El Valle, Panama Kei Okabe Thurber SIT Study Abroad
    SIT Graduate Institute/SIT Study Abroad SIT Digital Collections Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection SIT Study Abroad Fall 12-6-2014 Differences in the Diversity of FrogSpecies between Sierra Lloronaand El Valle, Panama Kei Okabe Thurber SIT Study Abroad Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection Part of the Biodiversity Commons, Environmental Health and Protection Commons, Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons, Latin American Studies Commons, Other Animal Sciences Commons, Population Biology Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation Thurber, Kei Okabe, "Differences in the Diversity of FrogSpecies between Sierra Lloronaand El Valle, Panama" (2014). Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection. 2000. https://digitalcollections.sit.edu/isp_collection/2000 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the SIT Study Abroad at SIT Digital Collections. It has been accepted for inclusion in Independent Study Project (ISP) Collection by an authorized administrator of SIT Digital Collections. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Differences in the Diversity of Frog Species between Sierra Llorona and El Valle, Panama By Kei Thurber SIT Panama, Fall 2014 Thurber 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements ................................................................. 3 Abstract ................................................................................... 4 Resumen ................................................................................
    [Show full text]