Peptide Vaccines for Cancer Therapy

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Peptide Vaccines for Cancer Therapy Send Orders for Reprints to reprints@benthamscience.ae 38 Recent Patents on Inflammation & Allergy Drug Discovery 2015, 9, 38-45 Peptide Vaccines for Cancer Therapy Daniela Cerezo, María J. Peña, Michael Mijares, Gricelis Martínez, Isaac Blanca and Juan B. De Sanctis* FOCIS Center of Excellence, Instituto de Inmunología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Caracas, Venezuela Received: October 13, 2014; Accepted: January 21, 2015; Revised: January 24, 2015 Abstract: For around four decades, vaccines of different kinds have been developed to treat different types of cancer. However, promising results encountered in the early phase contrasted with the results recorded in clinical studies. Recent discoveries in the vaccine field, adjuvants and delivery systems, and antigen presentation have lead to new patented approaches. The current review is focused on gen- eral description of peptide vaccines involving cancer antigen presentation, specific immune response, cell death dependent pathways, and target therapy for modified or mutated oncogenes. A rapid evolving research in the area may evolve in fruitful outcomes in the near future. Keywords: Adjuvants, antigen presentation, cancer, immune response, peptide, vaccines. INTRODUCTION antigens generated through nonstandard transcriptional and translational mechanisms may also be presented by MHC-I The key issue in inducing immune response is antigen [2-5]. presentation [1]. Antigen presentation is a complex process that involves intracellular compartments with a sequence of Antigen presentation by tumor cells is different from nor- events from degradation of a complex pathogen, or cell up to mal cells and therefore analysis of tumor antigens and cryptic binding to major histocompatibility complex proteins (MHC) tumor antigens differs enormously between them [2-5]. Ex- class I (MHC-I) or class II (MHC-II). Antigen presentation perimental data have revealed that tumor antigens are ex- generates a specific response, cytotoxic, MHC-I, antibody, T pressed differently (enhanced amount of antigen, novel neo helper response and, MHC-II [1]. The protective specific epitopes, etc.) as compared to normal cells [2-5]. In some tu- anti-tumoral immune response involves cytotoxic T cells and mors, the use of docking models, based on the data generated consequently MHC-I presentation [2-5]. However, immune from different MHC-I and relevant tumor-specific antigens response against tumor involves also the other T cell sub- (TSA) or tumor-associated antigens (TAAs), has revealed a populations [3-5]. probability cluster [2-5]. This cluster refers to binding and possible in vivo response [5]. Despite this fact, novel and The peptides presented by MHC-I vary from 8 to 11 highly immunogenic epitopes, capable of inducing an effec- amino acids in length and are generated from the proteaso- tive anti-tumor response, are not easily encountered [2-5]. In mal degradation of cytosolic protein antigens that are taken addition, adjuvants and delivery systems used in vaccines may up by the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and consequently modulate antigen presentation by antigen presenting cells re- loaded onto MHC-I molecules [1-5]. Once the peptide binds sulting in a decrease in effective anti-tumor response or an to MHC-I, in the ER, it stabilizes the complex which is then increase in tolerogenic response. Thus, therapeutic cancer vac- transported to the cell membrane [1-5]. In the membrane, the cines have been proposed as a result of analyzing the wide peptide can be scrutinized by circulating CD8 cells, a proc- variety of genetic mutations and abnormal protein expressions ess usually named “immune surveillance” [2-5]. Since encountered in different tumors [2-5]. Its major drawback in- MHCs are highly polymorphic, the binding of the antigen volves the limited expression of the antigen and the highly and its presentation is not universal [2-5]. There are certain probability of mutation depending on the stage and type of “public” MHC-I proteins which are predominantly expressed tumor [2-5]. In addition, tumor microenvironments induce in different ethnic groups and thus serve as the target mole- tolerogenic responses and ideally, but it is not always encoun- cules for therapeutic vaccines [2-5]. Nonetheless, cryptic tered; adjuvants, peptides and immune enhancers should be able to surpass the tolerogenic response [4, 5]. *Address correspondence to this author at the Instituto de Inmunología, The aim of the present review is to give a brief picture of Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Central de Venezuela, Apartado 50109, Caracas 1050-A, Venezuela; Tel: +58-212-6934767; peptide vaccines in cancer therapy and the new patents that Fax: +58-212-6932815; Email: sanctisj@gmail.com have been submitted in the recent years. 2212-2710/15 $100.00+.00 © 2015 Bentham Science Publishers Cancer & Peptide Vaccines Recent Patents on Inflammation & Allergy Drug Discovery 2015, Vol. 9, No. 1 39 TUMOR ANTIGENS culated epitopes could bind multiple HLA A3 alleles in the superfamily, suggesting that these peptides could overcome Many groups of researchers have tried to understand if some differences in HLA expression in patient to patient the usually hampered immune response against a tumor is comparisons [3]. Algorithmic models also fail to provide the due to the lack of recognition of the abnormal cells or im- only specific interaction since antigen binding may be re- mune tolerance. In order to address this issue, an overview of corded to other MHC molecules with different affinity [3]. the different approaches used is presented. One may envision that algorithmic models may represent The first lesson that the researchers have learned is that partially what occurs in vivo, and possibly the direct assess- tumor antigen expression is heterogeneous [3]. There are ment of cytotoxic cells in the tumor would give more spe- tumor specific and associated antigens [2-5]. Moreover, sev- cific results [3, 5]. eral levels of expressions of these antigens may be encoun- Studies with HPLC and mass spectroscopy of the MHC-I tered back as: 1) lack of antigen; 2) low amount of antigen; peptide complex are able to validate the predictive models 3) high amount of antigen; and 4) homogenous and/or het- and generate new possible targets [3, 5, 8-10]. Immunopro- erogeneous antigens (mixed or combined antigens). Conse- teomic analysis represents an enormous advantage due to the quently, it is not a simple task to find the ideal antigen to fact that epitopes that are naturally presented on tumor cells which the immune response should be directed. surface correspond to the clinically important targets for The first approach in cancer vaccines was to homogenize immunotherapy and vaccine design [3, 5, 8-10]. Moreover, tumor cells in order to assess specific antigens [2-5]; how- cancer neoepitopes should be addressed consciously [9]. ever, this approach and the use of vaccine with and without These identification techniques permit subtract antigens pre- adjuvants and immune enhancers resulted in a lack of spe- sented in normal tissue leading to only relevant molecules cific responses and a high amount of unwanted secondary for cell activation. Several models, including an in silico effects. The proteomic analysis and comparisons of normal model predicting peptide epitopes and vaccines have been and tumor cells were, in most cases, difficult to accomplish. published [8-11]. An alternative approach to tumor homogenates was the The important issue is to ascertain the real epitopes to use of cDNA libraries of tumor cells and subsequently trans- which the vaccine should be designed, the construct, adju- fect them into normal, antigen presenting cells [3-5]. By this vant, immune enhancer and the delivery which would lead to approach, translated antigens are processed and presented as the ultimate goal, an effective immune response against the epitopes loaded in MHC-I molecules. This technique is use- tumor. ful for MAGE-1, melanoma antigen, presented by HLA-A1, tyrosinase presented by HLA-A2, and other antigens [3-5]. CANCER PEPTIDE VACCINES Nevertheless, the processing of the tumor antigen does not Several reviews have addressed the issue of different necessarily resemble real in vivo antigen presentation since vaccines assays, clinical trials and their outcomes [3-5, 12- transcription of the antigen may be modulated differently in 15, http://www.clinicaltrials.gov]. The current review gives tumor cells as compared with normal cells [3-5]. There may only a general overview of the most important up to date be over or under expression of the antigen plus the posttran- approaches which are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. scriptional modifications may differ among tumor versus As aforementioned, most of the peptide vaccines were normal cells [3]. Skipper and co-workers [6] showed the developed with prediction motif methodology. Using this difference in CD8 response to tyrosinase tumor antigen in technique, the most studied models involved melanoma and vivo and the aforementioned technique. Fortunately, a renal carcinoma. The first clinical trial implicated the protein change in amino acid, an asparagine to aspartic acid, did not MAGE 1 (melanoma associated antigen). The results of im- affect HLA-A2 binding and generated a robust T cytotoxic munoproteomic assessments involved multiple epitopes [2-5, response. With several other antigens, the response was ei- 8]. The first interesting report dealt with the effectiveness of ther deem or nonexistent [3]. Proteolytic activity, involved in a 12 versus a 4 MHC-I peptide-based vaccine, a Phase II trial antigen presentation, may also be responsible for this differ- with stage IIB to IV melanoma patients [16]. Even though, ence [3-5]. no significant clinical results were recorded; the production Another method to identify tumor antigens is motif pre- of IFN was increased in cytotoxic cells and consequently, diction using pMHC-I binding algorithms [3-5]. The model the vaccine was able to generate a cytotoxic response to the involves sequences of peptides that bind MHC-I that can be inoculated antigens [16].
Recommended publications
  • Mrna Vaccine: a Potential Therapeutic Strategy Yang Wang† , Ziqi Zhang† , Jingwen Luo† , Xuejiao Han† , Yuquan Wei and Xiawei Wei*
    Wang et al. Molecular Cancer (2021) 20:33 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-021-01311-z REVIEW Open Access mRNA vaccine: a potential therapeutic strategy Yang Wang† , Ziqi Zhang† , Jingwen Luo† , Xuejiao Han† , Yuquan Wei and Xiawei Wei* Abstract mRNA vaccines have tremendous potential to fight against cancer and viral diseases due to superiorities in safety, efficacy and industrial production. In recent decades, we have witnessed the development of different kinds of mRNAs by sequence optimization to overcome the disadvantage of excessive mRNA immunogenicity, instability and inefficiency. Based on the immunological study, mRNA vaccines are coupled with immunologic adjuvant and various delivery strategies. Except for sequence optimization, the assistance of mRNA-delivering strategies is another method to stabilize mRNAs and improve their efficacy. The understanding of increasing the antigen reactiveness gains insight into mRNA-induced innate immunity and adaptive immunity without antibody-dependent enhancement activity. Therefore, to address the problem, scientists further exploited carrier-based mRNA vaccines (lipid-based delivery, polymer-based delivery, peptide-based delivery, virus-like replicon particle and cationic nanoemulsion), naked mRNA vaccines and dendritic cells-based mRNA vaccines. The article will discuss the molecular biology of mRNA vaccines and underlying anti-virus and anti-tumor mechanisms, with an introduction of their immunological phenomena, delivery strategies, their importance on Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and related clinical trials against cancer and viral diseases. Finally, we will discuss the challenge of mRNA vaccines against bacterial and parasitic diseases. Keywords: mRNA vaccine, Self-amplifying RNA, Non-replicating mRNA, Modification, Immunogenicity, Delivery strategy, COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, Clinical trials, Antibody-dependent enhancement, Dendritic cell targeting Introduction scientists are seeking to develop effective cancer vac- A vaccine stimulates the immune response of the body’s cines.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of COVID-19 Vaccines in Development: 6 Months Into the Pandemic
    Article Review A review of COVID-19 vaccines in development: 6 months into the pandemic Merlin Sanicas, Melvin Sanicas, Doudou Diop, Emanuele Montomoli Corresponding author: Doudou Diop, PATH, Dakar, Sénégal. drdiop@path.org Received: 13 Jul 2020 - Accepted: 29 Jul 2020 - Published: 05 Oct 2020 Keywords: Coronavirus, COVID-19, pandemic, vaccine development Copyright: Merlin Sanicas et al. Pan African Medical Journal (ISSN: 1937-8688). This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Cite this article: Merlin Sanicas et al. A review of COVID-19 vaccines in development: 6 months into the pandemic. Pan African Medical Journal. 2020;37(124). 10.11604/pamj.2020.37.124.24973 Available online at: https://www.panafrican-med-journal.com/content/article/37/124/full A review of COVID-19 vaccines in development: 6 Abstract months into the pandemic 1 2 3,& The advent of the COVID-19 pandemic and the Merlin Sanicas , Melvin Sanicas , Doudou Diop , dynamics of its spread is unprecedented. 4,5 Emanuele Montomoli Therefore, the need for a vaccine against the virus is huge. Researchers worldwide are working 1Centre de Recherche en Cancérologie de around the clock to find a vaccine. Experts Marseille, Université Aix-Marseille, Marseille, 2 estimate that a fast-tracked vaccine development France, Clinical Development, Takeda process could speed a successful candidate to Pharmaceuticals International AG, Zurich, 3 4 market in approximately 12-18 months.
    [Show full text]
  • B-Cell Epitope Prediction for Peptide-Based Vaccine Design: Towards a Paradigm of Biological Outcomes for Global Health
    Caoili et al. Immunome Research 2011, 7:2:2 http://www.immunome-research.net/ RESEARCH Open Access B-cell epitope prediction for peptide-based vaccine design: towards a paradigm of biological outcomes for global health Salvador Eugenio C. Caoili Abstract Global health must address a rapidly evolving burden of disease, hence the urgent need for versatile generic technologies exemplified by peptide-based vaccines. B-cell epitope prediction is crucial for designing such vaccines; yet this approach has thus far been largely unsuccessful, prompting further inquiry into the underly- ing reasons for its apparent inadequacy. Two major obstacles to the development of B-cell epitope prediction for peptide-based vaccine design are (1) the prevailing binary classification paradigm, which mandates the problematic dichotomization of continuous outcome variables, and (2) failure to explicitly model biological consequences of immunization that are relevant to practical considerations of safety and efficacy. The first obstacle is eliminated by redefining the predictive task as quantitative estimation of empirically observable biological effects of antibody-antigen binding, such that prediction is benchmarked using measures of corre- lation between continuous rather than dichotomous variables; but this alternative approach by itself fails to address the second obstacle even if benchmark data are selected to exclusively reflect functionally relevant cross-reactivity of antipeptide antibodies with protein antigens (as evidenced by antibody-modulated protein biological activity), particularly where only antibody-antigen binding is actually predicted as a surrogate for its biological effects. To overcome the second obstacle, the prerequisite is deliberate effort to predict, a priori, biological outcomes that are of immediate practical significance from the perspective of vaccination.
    [Show full text]
  • Heterosubtypic Influenza Protection Elicited by Double-Layered
    Heterosubtypic influenza protection elicited by double- layered polypeptide nanoparticles in mice Lei Denga, Timothy Z. Changb, Ye Wanga, Song Lib, Shelly Wangc, Shingo Matsuyamaa, Guoying Yud, Richard W. Compansc, Jian-Dong Lia, Mark R. Prausnitzb, Julie A. Championb, and Bao-Zhong Wanga,1 aCenter for Inflammation, Immunity & Infection, Georgia State University Institute for Biomedical Sciences, Atlanta, GA 30303; bSchool of Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332; cEmory Vaccine Center, Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30307; and dState Key Laboratory of Fibrosis Biology, College of Life Science, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang, 453002 Henan, China Edited by Peter Palese, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, and approved July 9, 2018 (received for review April 5, 2018) Influenza is a persistent threat to public health. Here we report required for complete protection against a lethal influenza A that double-layered peptide nanoparticles induced robust specific challenge (14). immunity and protected mice against heterosubtypic influenza A Nanotechnology provides a promising approach for the de- virus challenges. We fabricated the nanoparticles by desolvating a velopment of new generations of influenza vaccines. Physiolog- composite peptide of tandem copies of nucleoprotein epitopes into ically activated disassembling nanoparticles mimic the biophysical nanoparticles as cores and cross-linking another composite peptide of and biochemical cues of virions and initiate “danger” signals that four tandem copies of influenza matrix protein 2 ectodomain epitopes enhance the activation of innate immunity and elicit potent cellular to the core surfaces as a coating. Delivering the nanoparticles via dis- and humoral immune responses with minimal cytotoxicity (15).
    [Show full text]
  • An Effective Strategy of Human Tumor Vaccine Modification by Coupling
    An effective strategy of human tumor vaccine modification by coupling bispecific costimulatory molecules Claudia Haas,1 Christel Herold-Mende,2 Roswitha Gerhards,3 and Volker Schirrmacher1 1German Cancer Research Center, Tumor Immunology Program, Heidelberg, Germany; 2Department of Neurosurgery, University-Clinic, Heidelberg, Germany; and 3Marien-Hospital, Herne, Germany. A new, generally applicable procedure is described for the introduction of defined costimulatory molecules into human cancer cells to increase their T-cell stimulatory capacity. The procedure involves infection with Newcastle disease virus to mediate the cell surface binding of costimulatory molecules (e.g., specially designed bispecific antibodies (bsAb)). The modification is independent of tumor cell proliferation and laborious recombinant gene technology and can be applied directly to freshly isolated and g-irradiated patient-derived tumor cells as an autologous cancer vaccine. Following the infection of tumor cells with a nonvirulent strain of Newcastle disease virus, the cells are washed and then further modified by coincubation with bsAbs, which attach with one arm to the viral hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) molecule on the infected tumor cells. The second specificity of one bsAb (bs HN 3 CD28) is directed against CD28 to augment antitumor T-cell responses by selectively channeling positive costimulatory signals via the CD28 pathway. A second bsAb (bs HN 3 CD3) was produced to deliver T-cell receptor-mediated signals either alone (bsCD3 vaccine) or in combination with anti-CD28 (bsCD3 vaccine plus bsCD28 vaccine). In human T-cell stimulation studies in vitro, the bsCD28 vaccine caused an up-regulation of early (CD69) and late (CD25) T-cell activation markers on CD4 and CD8 T lymphocytes from either normal healthy donors or cancer patients (autologous system) and induced tumor cytostasis in nonmodified bystander tumor cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant-Made HIV Vaccines and Potential Candidates
    Plant-made HIV vaccines and potential candidates Jocelyne Tremouillaux-Guiller1, Khaled Moustafa2, Kathleen Hefferon3, Goabaone Gaobotse4, and Abdullah Makhzoum4 1Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University François Rabelais, Tours, France. 2Arabic Science Archive – ArabiXiv (https://arabixiv.org). 3Department of Microbiology, Cornell University, USA. 4Department of Biological Sciences & Biotechnology, Botswana International University of Science & Technology, Botswana. Correspondence: klh22@cornell.edu; abmakhzoum@gmail.com Highlights HIV/AIDS is a partially treatable but not completely curable pandemic disease. Major advances have been made to treat patients living with HIV/AIDS. Developing HIV vaccines is an ongoing endeavor and moves at an accelerated pace Plant molecular pharming is a valuable tool in HIV/AIDS vaccine research. Abstract Millions of people around the world suffer from heavy social and health burdens related to HIV/AIDS and its associated opportunistic infections. To reduce these burdens, preventive and therapeutic vaccines are required. Effective HIV vaccines have been under investigation for several decades using different animal models. Potential plant-made HIV vaccine candidates have also gained attention in the past few years. In addition to this, broadly neutralizing antibodies produced in plants which can target conserved viral epitopes and neutralize mutating HIV strains have been identified. Numerous epitopes of glycoproteins and capsid proteins of HIV-1 are a part of HIV therapy. Here, we discuss some recent findings aiming to produce anti-HIV-1 recombinant proteins in engineered plants for AIDS prophylactics and therapeutic treatments. Keywords: plant made pharmaceuticals; HIV vaccine; AIDS drug; plant molecular pharming/farming; multiepitopic HIV vaccine. 1 Introduction Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) is one of the greatest challenges to global public health today.
    [Show full text]
  • Vaccination in Developing Countries: Problems, Challenges and Opportunities - T
    GLOBAL PERSPECTIVES IN HEALTH - Vol. II - Vaccination in Developing Countries: Problems, Challenges and Opportunities - T. Pang VACCINATION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: PROBLEMS, CHALLENGES, AND OPPORTUNITIES T. Pang Department of Research Policy and Cooperation, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland Keywords: Developing countries, vaccination, immunization Contents 1. Introduction 2. Challenges to Improving Vaccination 3. Obstacles to Effective Vaccination 4. Solutions to Problems of Access and Coverage 5. Mechanisms: Cooperation Between Industrialized Nations and Developing Nations 6. Recent Initiatives—A Brighter Future? 6.1. The International Vaccine Institute 6.2. Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization 6.3. Millennium Vaccine Initiative 6.4. International AIDS Vaccine Initiative 6.5. Malaria Vaccine Initiative 7. Role of the World Health Organization 8. The Future Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary Vaccines are the most inexpensive means of improving health and lowering morbidity and mortality caused by infectious diseases in the developing world. However, and in spite of significant advances in science and technology, the implementation of global vaccination coverage remains a pipe dream. Many obstacles and challenges remain, and imaginative and bold solutions are required. Recent initiatives based on international cooperation,UNESCO philanthropy, and goodwill – promise EOLSS a brighter future for those in need living in the developing world. 1. IntroductionSAMPLE CHAPTERS The eradication of smallpox and the imminent demise of polio are clear reminders of the power of vaccination in dealing with the scourge of communicable diseases in the developing world. The World Health Organization’s (WHO) Expanded Program for Immunization (EPI), which is focused on the six major diseases of childhood (diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus, polio, measles, and tuberculosis), succeeded in dramatically raising immunization coverage in developing countries from 5% in the 1970s to more than 80% of the birth cohort in the 1990s.
    [Show full text]
  • HIV Envelope Antigen Valency on Peptide Nanofibers
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN HIV envelope antigen valency on peptide nanofbers modulates antibody magnitude and binding breadth Chelsea N. Fries1,9, Jui‑Lin Chen2,3,9, Maria L. Dennis3, Nicole L. Votaw1, Joshua Eudailey3, Brian E. Watts3, Kelly M. Hainline1, Derek W. Cain3, Richard Barfeld4, Cliburn Chan4, M. Anthony Moody3,5,6, Barton F. Haynes3,6, Kevin O. Saunders2,3,6,7, Sallie R. Permar2,3,5,6,8, Genevieve G. Fouda2,3,5* & Joel H. Collier1,6* A major challenge in developing an efective vaccine against HIV‑1 is the genetic diversity of its viral envelope. Because of the broad range of sequences exhibited by HIV‑1 strains, protective antibodies must be able to bind and neutralize a widely mutated viral envelope protein. No vaccine has yet been designed which induces broadly neutralizing or protective immune responses against HIV in humans. Nanomaterial‑based vaccines have shown the ability to generate antibody and cellular immune responses of increased breadth and neutralization potency. Thus, we have developed supramolecular nanofber‑based immunogens bearing the HIV gp120 envelope glycoprotein. These immunogens generated antibody responses that had increased magnitude and binding breadth compared to soluble gp120. By varying gp120 density on nanofbers, we determined that increased antigen valency was associated with increased antibody magnitude and germinal center responses. This study presents a proof‑of‑concept for a nanofber vaccine platform generating broad, high binding antibody responses against the HIV‑1 envelope glycoprotein. HIV-1/AIDS has been responsible for 30 million deaths since it became a global pandemic1. Despite decades of research, a vaccine against HIV-1 has remained elusive.
    [Show full text]
  • Immunology 101
    Immunology 101 Justin Kline, M.D. Assistant Professor of Medicine Section of Hematology/Oncology Committee on Immunology University of Chicago Medicine Disclosures • I served as a consultant on Advisory Boards for Merck and Seattle Genetics. • I will discuss non-FDA-approved therapies for cancer 2 Outline • Innate and adaptive immune systems – brief intro • How immune responses against cancer are generated • Cancer antigens in the era of cancer exome sequencing • Dendritic cells • T cells • Cancer immune evasion • Cancer immunotherapies – brief intro 3 The immune system • Evolved to provide protection against invasive pathogens • Consists of a variety of cells and proteins whose purpose is to generate immune responses against micro-organisms • The immune system is “educated” to attack foreign invaders, but at the same time, leave healthy, self-tissues unharmed • The immune system can sometimes recognize and kill cancer cells • 2 main branches • Innate immune system – Initial responders • Adaptive immune system – Tailored attack 4 The immune system – a division of labor Innate immune system • Initial recognition of non-self (i.e. infection, cancer) • Comprised of cells (granulocytes, monocytes, dendritic cells and NK cells) and proteins (complement) • Recognizes non-self via receptors that “see” microbial structures (cell wall components, DNA, RNA) • Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) • Necessary for priming adaptive immune responses 5 The immune system – a division of labor Adaptive immune system • Provides nearly unlimited diversity of receptors to protect the host from infection • B cells and T cells • Have unique receptors generated during development • B cells produce antibodies which help fight infection • T cells patrol for infected or cancerous cells • Recognize “foreign” or abnormal proteins on the cell surface • 100,000,000 unique T cells are present in all of us • Retains “memory” against infections and in some cases, cancer.
    [Show full text]
  • Immunity Against Mucosal Pathogens?
    What Role Does the Route of Immunization Play in the Generation of Protective Immunity against Mucosal Pathogens? This information is current as Igor M. Belyakov and Jeffrey D. Ahlers of October 3, 2021. J Immunol 2009; 183:6883-6892; ; doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901466 http://www.jimmunol.org/content/183/11/6883 Downloaded from References This article cites 92 articles, 38 of which you can access for free at: http://www.jimmunol.org/content/183/11/6883.full#ref-list-1 Why The JI? Submit online. http://www.jimmunol.org/ • Rapid Reviews! 30 days* from submission to initial decision • No Triage! Every submission reviewed by practicing scientists • Fast Publication! 4 weeks from acceptance to publication *average by guest on October 3, 2021 Subscription Information about subscribing to The Journal of Immunology is online at: http://jimmunol.org/subscription Permissions Submit copyright permission requests at: http://www.aai.org/About/Publications/JI/copyright.html Email Alerts Receive free email-alerts when new articles cite this article. Sign up at: http://jimmunol.org/alerts The Journal of Immunology is published twice each month by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc., 1451 Rockville Pike, Suite 650, Rockville, MD 20852 Copyright © 2009 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 0022-1767 Online ISSN: 1550-6606. What Role Does the Route of Immunization Play in the Generation of Protective Immunity against Mucosal Pathogens? Igor M. Belyakov1* and Jeffrey D. Ahlers† The route of vaccination is important in influencing im- stream, although some microorganisms are limited to the de- mune responses at the initial site of pathogen invasion velopment of disease only at the site of initial mucosal invasion where protection is most effective.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dendritic Cell Cancer Vaccine
    MILESTONES MILESTONE 17 to mature. The pulsed dendritic cells are then reinfused into the patient over several cycles. A dendritic cell cancer vaccine Although sipuleucel-T has not been very widely adopted (and is no longer available in the European Union), it was recently announced that the combination of hormonal therapeutics with sipuleucel-T extended the survival of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Other clinical trials combining sipuleucel-T with radiation, hormo- nal, targeted or other immunothera- pies are ongoing. So far sipuleucel-T remains the only vaccine-based immunotherapy approved for prostate cancer, and is also the only approved cell-based vaccine in the USA. Overall clinical responses to dendritic cell vaccines have been disappointing, but with increasing Credit: Science Photo Library / Alamy Stock Photo Science Photo Library Credit: knowledge, newer and more sophisti- cated strategies are being investigated In 1909 Paul Ehrlich postulated that T cells and induce protective T cell to improve the efficacy of dendritic the immune system may defend responses. If a cancer-specific antigen cell-based vaccines. Improved meth- the host against neoplastic cells and is presented, this can result in an Sipuleucel-T ods to generate more mature and hinder the development of cancers. anti-tumour response. As T cell became in ‘effective’ dendritic cells using ex vivo This concept has been widely recog- responses are indeed crucial for 2010 the first protocols, alternative combinations nized ever since, and eventually led eliciting an immune response against of antigens, optimized loading of to the development of novel cancer cancers, dendritic cells have for a approved dendritic cells and transfection of treatments in more recent years that long time been suggested as potential dendritic cell dendritic cells with RNA or DNA are revolutionized cancer care.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Applications for Mrna and Peptide-Based Vaccines
    viruses Article An Epitope Platform for Safe and Effective HTLV-1-Immunization: Potential Applications for mRNA and Peptide-Based Vaccines Guglielmo Lucchese 1,*,†, Hamid Reza Jahantigh 2,3,† , Leonarda De Benedictis 2, Piero Lovreglio 2 and Angela Stufano 2,3 1 Department of Neurology, Medical University of Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany 2 Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine-Section of Occupational Medicine, University of Bari, 70124 Bari, Italy; hamidreza.jahantigh@uniba.it (H.R.J.); leonarda.debenedictis@uniba.it (L.D.B.); piero.lovreglio@uniba.it (P.L.); angela.stufano@uniba.it (A.S.) 3 Animal Health and Zoonosis Doctoral Program, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Bari, 70010 Bari, Italy * Correspondence: guglielmo.lucchese@uni-greifswald.de † These authors contributed equally to the work. Abstract: Human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1 (HTLV-1) infection affects millions of individuals worldwide and can lead to severe leukemia, myelopathy/tropical spastic paraparesis, and numerous other disorders. Pursuing a safe and effective immunotherapeutic approach, we compared the viral polyprotein and the human proteome with a sliding window approach in order to identify oligopeptide sequences unique to the virus. The immunological relevance of the viral unique oligopeptides was assessed by searching them in the immune epitope database (IEDB). We found that Citation: Lucchese, G.; Jahantigh, HTLV-1 has 15 peptide stretches each consisting of uniquely viral non-human pentapeptides which H.R.; De Benedictis, L.; Lovreglio, P.; Stufano, A. An Epitope Platform for are ideal candidate for a safe and effective anti-HTLV-1 vaccine. Indeed, experimentally validated Safe and Effective HTLV-1 epitopes, as retrieved from the IEDB, contain peptide sequences also present in a vast number HTLV-1-Immunization: Potential of human proteins, thus potentially instituting the basis for cross-reactions.
    [Show full text]