DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 3A Physical Environment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 3A Physical Environment U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service DOI DES 12-8 Izembek National Wildlife Refuge Land Exchange/Road Corridor Draft Environmental Impact Statement Chapter 3.1 Affected Environment: Physical Environment CHAPTER 3 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT ....................................................................................... 3-1 3.1 Physical Environment ............................................................................................. 3-1 3.1.1 Air Quality .................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1.1.1 Study Area ................................................................................... 3-1 3.1.1.2 Regulatory Framework and Pollutants of Concern ...................... 3-1 3.1.1.3 Existing Air Quality ..................................................................... 3-3 3.1.2 Climate ........................................................................................................ 3-5 3.1.2.1 Introduction .................................................................................. 3-5 3.1.2.2 Cold Bay Area.............................................................................. 3-5 3.1.2.3 Kodiak .......................................................................................... 3-8 3.1.2.4 Climate Patterns and Trends ........................................................ 3-9 3.1.3 Geology and Soils ..................................................................................... 3-10 3.1.3.1 Regional Geology Overview ...................................................... 3-10 3.1.3.2 Geology of the Cold Bay Region ............................................... 3-10 3.1.3.3 Geology of Sitkinak Island ........................................................ 3-11 3.1.3.4 Soils of the Cold Bay Region..................................................... 3-11 3.1.3.5 Soils of Sitkinak Island .............................................................. 3-12 3.1.3.6 Oil and Gas Resource Potential ................................................. 3-12 3.1.3.7 Economic Mineral and Non-Mineral Resource Potential .......... 3-14 3.1.3.8 Geologic Hazards ....................................................................... 3-16 3.1.4 Hydrology/Hydrologic Processes ............................................................. 3-17 3.1.4.1 Regional Hydrology Overview .................................................. 3-17 3.1.4.2 Hydrology of the Cold Bay Region ........................................... 3-18 3.1.4.3 Hydrology of Sitkinak Island ..................................................... 3-19 3.1.4.4 Water Quality of the Cold Bay Region ...................................... 3-21 3.1.4.5 Water Quality of Sitkinak Island ............................................... 3-22 3.1.5 Hazardous Materials ................................................................................. 3-23 3.1.5.1 Regulatory Framework .............................................................. 3-24 3.1.5.2 Documented Sites ...................................................................... 3-24 3.1.6 Noise ......................................................................................................... 3-30 3.1.6.1 Noise Background ...................................................................... 3-30 3.1.6.2 Existing Noise ............................................................................ 3-33 IZEMBEK NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE 3-i LAND EXCHANGE/ROAD CORRIDOR EIS CHAPTER 3 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS 3.1.7 Marine Characteristics .............................................................................. 3-36 3.1.7.1 Bathymetry and Circulation ....................................................... 3-36 3.1.7.2 Waves ......................................................................................... 3-36 3.1.7.3 Sea Ice ........................................................................................ 3-36 LIST OF TABLES Table 3.1-1 Ambient Air Quality Standards for Carbon Monoxide and PM10 .............................................................................................................. 3-2 Table 3.1-2 Average Temperature and Precipitation at the Cold Bay Airport, Alaska ............................................................................................... 3-6 Table 3.1-3 Average Cloud and Wind Conditions at the Cold Bay Airport, Alaska ............................................................................................................ 3-7 Table 3.1-4 Average Temperature and Precipitation in Kodiak, AK ................................ 3-8 Table 3.1-5 Average Cloud and Wind Conditions for Kodiak, AK .................................. 3-9 Table 3.1-6 Tidal Ranges for Cold Bay Region .............................................................. 3-17 Table 3.1-7 Known Contaminated Sites Cold Bay and Sitkinak Island ......................... 3-28 Table 3.1-8 Typical A-Weighted Noise Levels............................................................... 3-31 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 3.1-1 Exploration Oil and Gas Wells Within Alaska Peninsula and Bristol Bay Basin .................................................................................. 3-13 Figure 3.1-2 Mineral and Geothermal Resources ............................................................. 3-15 Figure 3.1-3 Approximate Hydrologic Boundary Between Izembek Lagoon and Kinzarof Lagoon ................................................................................... 3-20 Figure 3.1-4 Contaminated Sites Cold Bay Area ............................................................. 3-26 Figure 3.1-5 Contaminated Sites Sitkinak Island ............................................................. 3-27 IZEMBEK NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE 3-ii LAND EXCHANGE/ROAD CORRIDOR EIS CHAPTER 3 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT 3.1.1 AIR QUALITY 3.0 AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT 3.1 Physical Environment 3.1.1 Air Quality Air quality is a function of the air pollutant emission sources in an area, atmospheric conditions (such as wind direction and speed), and characteristics of the area itself (topography and air shed size). Pollutants transported from outside the area can also affect air quality. Localized sources of emissions include both man-made (anthropogenic) and natural emission sources. Industrial, residential, transportation-related, and construction-related emissions are anthropogenic sources; these sources can be either ongoing or temporary. Natural sources include emissions from windblown dust, forest fires, and volcanic eruptions; these typically contribute only to temporary increases in air pollution. Air quality in the majority of Alaska’s coastal region is generally considered very good, because of minimal human habitation and industrial development, along with the distance to population centers such as Anchorage or Fairbanks (ADEC 2010b). 3.1.1.1 Study Area For air quality related to the proposed land exchange (Alternatives 2 and 3), the 6 parcels (identified in Table 2.4-6) can be divided into 2 groups: national wildlife refuge and non- national wildlife refuge lands. The national wildlife refuge lands (Izembek, Alaska Peninsula, and Alaska Maritime National Wildlife Refuges, which includes Sitkinak Island and areas proposed for land exchange) contain minimal anthropogenic sources of air pollution (short-term [temporary] transportation-related emissions) and natural emission sources. The non-national wildlife refuge lands (State of Alaska lands and King Cove Corporation lands) also have minimal anthropogenic and natural emission sources. 3.1.1.2 Regulatory Framework and Pollutants of Concern Air Quality Standards Air quality in Alaska is regulated by the United States (U.S.) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation. The EPA has established the National Ambient Air Quality Standards, which specify maximum concentrations for 8 criteria pollutants (EPA 2010c). Nonattainment areas are geographic regions where air pollutant concentrations exceed the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for a pollutant. The main criteria air pollutants affecting Alaska are carbon monoxide and particulate matter less than 10 microns in diameter (PM10). Outdoor carbon monoxide emissions come from combustion sources, such as automobiles, airplanes, and industrial engines (ADEC 2010c). Fuel combustion is also a source of particulate matter emissions. In rural communities, airborne dust (PM10) can be caused by windblown dust from glaciers, gravel pits, vehicles on dirt roads, dry river beds, and human activity on non-vegetated land (ADEC 2010d). Air quality standards for these pollutants are listed below in Table 3.1-1. IZEMBEK NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE 3-1 LAND EXCHANGE/ROAD CORRIDOR EIS CHAPTER 3 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT 3.1.1 AIR QUALITY Table 3.1-1 Ambient Air Quality Standards for Carbon Monoxide and PM10 National Ambient Pollutant Averaging Time Air Quality Standard 1-hour 35 ppm (40 mg/m3) Carbon Monoxide 8-hour 9 ppm (10 mg/m3) Particulate Matter < 10 μm (PM10) 24-hour 150 μg/m3 µm = microns (for particulate diameter) µg/m3 = micrograms of pollutant per cubic meter of air mg/m3 = milligrams of pollutant per cubic meter of air ppm = parts per million Source: EPA 2010c; ADEC 2010a Other Air Quality Evaluation Criteria Mobile Source Area Toxics The EPA defines air toxics, also known as hazardous air pollutants, as pollutants that cause or may
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jersey Industrial Complex Rancho Cucamonga, California
    JERSEY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA NOISE STUDY Prepared for: Ralph Karubian 11298 Jersey Boulevard, LLC 1801 South Mountain Avenue Monrovia, CA 91016 Prepared by: December 2020 Jersey Industrial Complex Noise Study JERSEY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX PROJECT RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CALIFORNIA Noise Study Table of Contents Page Project Description ........................................................................................................................... 1 Setting ................................................................................................................................................ 4 Overview of Sound Measurement ................................................................................................. 4 Sensitive Receptors .......................................................................................................................... 6 Project Site Setting ............................................................................................................................ 6 Regulatory Setting ............................................................................................................................ 8 Vibration Standards ....................................................................................................................... 11 Impact Analysis .............................................................................................................................. 12 Methodology and Significance Thresholds ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 4910-13 DEPARTMENT of TRANSPORTATION Federal
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 09/21/2020 and available online at federalregister.gov/d/2020-20567, and on govinfo.gov 4910-13 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 71 [Docket No. FAA-2020-0823; Airspace Docket No. 20-AAL-49] RIN 2120-AA66 Proposed Technical Amendment to Separate Terminal Airspace Areas from Norton Sound Low, Woody Island Low, Control 1234L, and Control 1487L Offshore Airspace Areas; Alaska AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT. ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM). SUMMARY: This action proposes to amend the following Offshore Airspace Areas in Alaska: Norton Sound Low, Woody Island Low, Control 1234L, and Control 1487L. The FAA found an error with the Offshore Airspace Legal Descriptions containing airspace descriptions not related to the need to apply IFR en route Air Traffic Control services in international airspace. This action would correct that error by removing terminal airspace, airspace associated with geographic coordinates, and airspace associated with NAVAIDs from the Offshore Airspace legal descriptions. DATES: Comments must be received on or before [INSERT DATE 45 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: Send comments on this proposal to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, D.C. 20590; telephone: 1(800) 647-5527, or (202) 366-9826. You must identify FAA Docket No. FAA-2020-0823; Airspace Docket No. 20-AAL-49 at the beginning of your comments. You may also submit comments through the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Environmental Impact Statement - Modification of the CONDOR 1 and CONDOR 2 Military Operations Areas (MOA), August 2009
    Maine State Library Digital Maine Transportation Documents Transportation 8-1-2009 Draft Environmental Impact Statement - Modification of the CONDOR 1 and CONDOR 2 Military Operations Areas (MOA), August 2009 Maine Department of Transportation Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalmaine.com/mdot_docs Draft Environmental Impact Statement – Modification of the Condor 1 and Condor 2 Military Operations Areas 104th Fighter Wing, Barnes Air National Guard Base, Westfield, MA Project No. ANG0956737 August 2009 Acronyms and Abbreviations 104 FW 104 Figher Wing MDIFW Maine Department of Inland AGL above ground level Fisheries and Wildlife AHAS Avian Hazard Advisory System MOA military operations area ANG Air National Guard MOU Memorandum of Understanding APE Area of Potential Effect MR_NMAP Military Operating Area and Range AQCR Air Quality Control Region Noise Model and Assessment AT Appalachian Trail Program ATC Air Traffic Control MSL mean sea level BAM Bird Avoidance Model MTR military training route BASH Bird Aircraft Strike Hazard NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality CAA Clean Air Act Standards CAP Combat Air Patrol NEPA National Environmental Policy CEQ Council on Environmental Quality Act CFR Code of Federal Regulations NHDES New Hampshire Department of CLNA Connecticut Lakes Natural Area Environmental Services CMR Combat Mission Ready NHNHB New Hampshire Natural Heritage CO Carbon Monoxide Bureau CWA Clean Water Act NHPA National Historic Preservation Act dB decibel NM nautical mile dBA A-weighted decibel NO2 nitrogen dioxide
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 83, No. 241/Monday, December 17, 2018
    Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 241 / Monday, December 17, 2018 / Proposed Rules 64491 airspace. This regulation is within the Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71 scope of that authority as it would 76177. Airspace, Incorporation by reference, establish Class E airspace extending Availability and Summary of Navigation (air). upward from 700 feet above the surface Documents for Incorporation by at Farington Field Airport, Auburn, NE, The Proposed Amendment Reference in support of standard instrument Accordingly, pursuant to the This document proposes to amend approach procedures for IFR operations authority delegated to me, the Federal FAA Order 7400.11C, Airspace at the airport. Aviation Administration proposes to Designations and Reporting Points, amend 14 CFR part 71 as follows: Comments Invited dated August 13, 2018, and effective Interested parties are invited to September 15, 2018. FAA Order PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A, participate in this proposed rulemaking 7400.11C is publicly available as listed B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR by submitting such written data, views, in the ADDRESSES section of this TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND or arguments, as they may desire. document. FAA Order 7400.11C lists REPORTING POINTS Comments that provide the factual basis Class A, B, C, D, and E airspace areas, supporting the views and suggestions air traffic service routes, and reporting ■ 1. The authority citation for 14 CFR presented are particularly helpful in points. part 71 continues to read as follows: developing reasoned regulatory decisions on the proposal. Comments The Proposal Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 106(g); 40103, 40113, 40120; E.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Adjustments to Service Obligations
    Served: May 12, 2020 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON, D.C. CONTINUATION OF CERTAIN AIR SERVICE PURSUANT TO PUBLIC LAW NO. 116-136 §§ 4005 AND 4114(b) Docket DOT-OST-2020-0037 NOTICE OF ADJUSTMENTS TO SERVICE OBLIGATIONS Summary By this notice, the U.S. Department of Transportation (the Department) announces an opportunity for incremental adjustments to service obligations under Order 2020-4-2, issued April 7, 2020, in light of ongoing challenges faced by U.S. airlines due to the Coronavirus (COVID-19) public health emergency. With this notice as the initial step, the Department will use a systematic process to allow covered carriers1 to reduce the number of points they must serve as a proportion of their total service obligation, subject to certain restrictions explained below.2 Covered carriers must submit prioritized lists of points to which they wish to suspend service no later than 5:00 PM (EDT), May 18, 2020. DOT will adjudicate these requests simultaneously and publish its tentative decisions for public comment before finalizing the point exemptions. As explained further below, every community that was served by a covered carrier prior to March 1, 2020, will continue to receive service from at least one covered carrier. The exemption process in Order 2020-4-2 will continue to be available to air carriers to address other facts and circumstances. Background On March 27, 2020, the President signed the Coronavirus Aid, Recovery, and Economic Security Act (the CARES Act) into law. Sections 4005 and 4114(b) of the CARES Act authorize the Secretary to require, “to the extent reasonable and practicable,” an air carrier receiving financial assistance under the Act to maintain scheduled air transportation service as the Secretary deems necessary to ensure services to any point served by that air carrier before March 1, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Suggestions for Expanding the Capabilities of the Emergency Alert System (Comments on EB Docket No. 04-296)
    October 29, 2004 Suggestions for Expanding the Capabilities of the Emergency Alert System Peter K. Sheerin (Comments on EB Docket No. 04-296) 1121 Nimitz Lane Foster City, CA 94404 The FCC is currently soliciting comments about proposed changes to the Emergency Alert System [email protected] Existing disaster notification methods in common use within the U.S. include: • National Weather Radio All-Hazards alert system with county-specific alert coding • EAS alerts transmitted via AM and FM broadcast stations • EAS alerts transmitted via television broadcast stations • Community Civil-Defense siren systems For various technological and social reasons, I don’t believe that these warning channels are sufficient to notify enough of the public to preserve lives and avoid panic in any true large-scale disaster that would require specific responses from the public, such as evacuation or shelter-in-place. Therefore, these existing alert systems should be augmented with the use of modern technology to enable the dissemination of high-quality, concise alerts to the public by multiple, redundant methods, so as to ensure reception by the widest possible percentage of the population, no matter what their current activity. I believe a few new mandates need to be created in order to ensure that common electronic devices can participate in the expanded national/local alert system, and while such mandates may on the surface appear in direct conflict with the American ideals of competition and freedom of innovation, the particular technologies I believe should be used would be a very small, or even non-existent burden on the device manufacturers, and will even serve to enhance the business prospects of these device manufacturers and the broadcast and telecommunications industries that use the devices.
    [Show full text]
  • BID SCHEDULE Version-2 *Note: Bidders Need Not Respond to All Lots, but All Items Within the Lot(S) Submitted Must Be Priced
    State of Alaska ITB 2521S010 Highway & Airport Maintenance Sand for Various Locations in the Southcoast Region BID SCHEDULE Version-2 *Note: Bidders need not respond to all lots, but all items within the lot(s) submitted must be priced. Only lots submitted for the State’s consideration are required as a deliverable. SOUTHEAST DISTRICT Lot 1 - Haines Delivery No Later than October 31, 2020 Item Delivery Location Stockpiler Specification Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Price 1 MP 25 Haines State Highway 2,275 Ton $ $ 2 Haines Maintenance Yard State Airport 1,750 Ton $ $ $ Total Price for Lot - 1 Lot 2 - Hoonah Delivery No Later than October 31, 2020 Item Delivery Location Stockpiler Specification Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Price 1 Hoonah Airport Contractor Airport 420 Ton $ $ $ Total Price for Lot - 2 Lot 3 - Juneau Delivery No Later than October 31, 2020 Item Delivery Location Stockpiler Specification Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Price 1 Juneau Maintenance Yard State Highway 2,000 Ton $ $ $ Total Price for Lot - 3 Lot 4 - Ketchikan Delivery No Later than October 31, 2020 Item Delivery Location Stockpiler Specification Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Price 1 Ketchikan Maintenance Yard Contractor Highway 2,100 Ton $ $ $ Total Price for Lot - 4 Lot 5 - Gustavus Delivery No Later than October 31, 2020 Item Delivery Location Stockpiler Specification Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Price 1 Gustavus Maintenance Yard Contractor Airport 420 Ton $ $ $ Total Price for Lot - 5 Continued on next page 1 State of Alaska ITB 2521S010 Highway & Airport Maintenance Sand for Various Locations in the Southcoast Region Lot 6 - Hoonah Delivery No Later than October 31, 2020 Item Delivery Location Stockpiler Specification Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Price 1 Klawock Maintenance Yard Contractor Highway 5,600 Ton $ $ $ Total Price for Lot - 6 Lot 7 - Petersburg Delivery No Later than October 31, 2020 Item Delivery Location Stockpiler Specification Quantity Unit Unit Price Extended Price 1 Petersburg Scow Bay, 288 Contractor Highway 1,176 Ton $ $ Mitkoff Hwy.
    [Show full text]
  • Hawaii County Letter Re: Compliance with Conditions
    William P. Kenoi BJ Leithead Todd layor Director Margaret K, Masanaga Deputy West Hnwaiq Office East Hawai'i ()ffice 74-5044 Ane Keohokalole Hwy 10l Pauahi Street, Suile 3 Kailua-Kona. Hawai'[ 96740 County of Hawai'i Phone {808) 323-4770 Hilo, Hawai'i 96720 Fax (808) 327-3563 Phone (808) 961-8288 PLANNING DEPARTMENT Fax (808) 961-8742 March 7, 2012 P'o t- Mr. Joe Vierra Belt Collins Hawaii Ltd. 2153 North King Street, Suite 200 rÿq Cÿ F:I Honolulu, HI 96819-4554 I C-o :::E "5. Dear Mr. Vierra: Applicant: The Newton Family Limited Partnership Docket No. A99-729 (SLU 1128) tad :ÿ7 Change of Zone Ordinance No. 06 27 (REZ 05-017) Subject: 2011 AnnualProgress Report Tax Map Key: 2-4-008: por. 033 This is to acknowledge receipt of your letters dated November 21, 201 l, containing annual progress reports in compliance with Condition No. 20 of Docket No. A99-729 and with Condition N of Change of Zone Ordinance No. 06 27 (REZ 05-017). Thank you for complying with these requirements. It is our understanding that the water commitment payment lequired by Condition D of Ordinance No. 06 27 was paid in 2006 but then returned to the applicant. Thus, the applicant has not complied with Condition D. Please immediately remit the water commitment payment to the Department of Water Supply. Once the applicant has complied with Condition D, an administrative time extension to secure final subdivisiun approval, as required by Condition E, can be granted. The next almual reports will be due on or before February 24, 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Archived Content Contenu Archivé
    ARCHIVED - Archiving Content ARCHIVÉE - Contenu archivé Archived Content Contenu archivé Information identified as archived is provided for L’information dont il est indiqué qu’elle est archivée reference, research or recordkeeping purposes. It est fournie à des fins de référence, de recherche is not subject to the Government of Canada Web ou de tenue de documents. Elle n’est pas Standards and has not been altered or updated assujettie aux normes Web du gouvernement du since it was archived. Please contact us to request Canada et elle n’a pas été modifiée ou mise à jour a format other than those available. depuis son archivage. Pour obtenir cette information dans un autre format, veuillez communiquer avec nous. This document is archival in nature and is intended Le présent document a une valeur archivistique et for those who wish to consult archival documents fait partie des documents d’archives rendus made available from the collection of Public Safety disponibles par Sécurité publique Canada à ceux Canada. qui souhaitent consulter ces documents issus de sa collection. Some of these documents are available in only one official language. Translation, to be provided Certains de ces documents ne sont disponibles by Public Safety Canada, is available upon que dans une langue officielle. Sécurité publique request. Canada fournira une traduction sur demande. February 1964 United States - Canada Agreement on Civil Emergency Planning Hurricane Carla's Lessons Control of Food Supplies Exposed to Fallout Emergency Sanitation in Disaster Santa Fe Civil Defence System hICY EASURES RGANIZATION THE EMO NATIONAL DIGEST Published by the Emergency Measures Organization, Ottawa, Ont.
    [Show full text]
  • Alaska Region (AAL) Runway Safety Plan, FY 2020
    COMMITTED TO CONTINUOUSLY IMPROVING SURFACE SAFETY. Alaska Region (AAL) Runway Safety Plan FY20 2019-2020 RUNWAY SAFETY COUNCIL (RSC) #45 www.faa.gov Executive Summary The Federal Aviation Administration’s (FAA) top data, development of new safety metrics, and priority is maintaining safety in the National leveraged organizational capabilities in support TABLE Airspace System (NAS). The goal for runway of meeting this goal. safety is to improve safety by decreasing the OF CONTENTS FAA Safety Management System (SMS) 4 number and severity of Runway Incursions (RI), In support of the NRSP, and in support of Runway Excursions (RE) and serious Surface Air Traffic Organization (ATO) Safety and Incidents. FAA’s 2018- 2020 National Runway Technical Training (AJI) FY2018 Business Plan, the Alaskan Region (AAL) has developed this Regional Runway Safety Plan (RRSP) Methodology Safety Plan (NRSP) outlines the FAA’s strategy 6 to adapt its runway safety efforts through Regional Runway Safety Plan (RRSP) to provide enhanced collection and integrated analysis of a roadmap with regional emphasis for FY2020. 7 FY20 RRSP Initiatives 8 Safety Assurance 10 Safety Risk Management (SRM) 12 Safety Policy 16 Safety Promotion 4 Alaskan Region (AAL) Runway Safety Plan FY20 Alaskan Region (AAL) Runway Safety Plan FY20 5 FAA Safety Management FY18-FY20 NRSP Objectives System (SMS) SAFETY FAA is employing and evolving a Safety The National Runway Safety Plan 2018-2020 ASSURANCE Identify Operating Hazards Management System (SMS), which provides a aligns our strategic priorities with established Program Data formalized and proactive approach to system Safety Risk Management principles. The plan Remain the global leader in assuring Voluntary Safety Reporting safety in order to find, analyze and address defines how the FAA, airports, and industry runway safety enhancement initiatives Investigations risk in the NAS.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 73, No. 212/Friday, October 31
    Federal Register / Vol. 73, No. 212 / Friday, October 31, 2008 / Rules and Regulations 64881 compliance with the requirements of National Archives and Records the airspace description revealed that it paragraph (f)(2) of this AD. Administration (NARA). For information on contained two items that were the availability of this material at NARA, call FAA AD Differences unnecessary. The Norton Sound Low (202) 741–6030, or go to: http:// _ 1,200 foot description for Selawik, AK, Note: This AD differs from the MCAI and/ www.archives.gov/federal register/ is not required. Similarly, the 1,200 ft. or service information as follows: No code_of_federal_regulations/ differences. ibr_locations.html. description for Control 1234L had duplicate references to Eareckson Air Other FAA AD Provisions Issued in Renton, Washington, on October Force Station. These two items are 9, 2008. (g) The following provisions also apply to addressed in the airspace descriptions Ali Bahrami, this AD: below. With the exception of editorial (1) Alternative Methods of Compliance Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, changes, this amendment is the same as (AMOCs): The Manager, International Aircraft Certification Service. that proposed in the NPRM. Branch, ANM–116, Transport Airplane [FR Doc. E8–25307 Filed 10–30–08; 8:45 am] These airspace areas are published in Directorate, FAA, has the authority to BILLING CODE 4910–13–P paragraph 6007 of FAA Order 7400.9R, approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested signed August 15, 2007, and effective using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. September 15, 2007, which is Send information to ATTN: Shahram DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Daneshmandi, Aerospace Engineer, incorporated by reference in 14 CFR 71.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Year Project Listing by House District
    Two Year Project Listing by House District FY2010 FY2011 Unrestricted Designated Other Federal Unrestricted Designated Other Federal HD Dept Project Title GF Amount GF Amount Amount Amount Total GF Amount GF Amount Amount Amount Total Ketchikan (HD 1) Trans Coffman Cove - Wander Around Town Trail 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 450,000 450,000 Trans Coffman Cove Maintenance Station 900,000 0 0 0 900,000 0 0 0 0 0 Commerce Historic Ketchikan, Inc. - Historic Clover Pass School Project 0 0 0 0 0 31,100 0 0 0 31,100 Commerce Hollis - Emergency Services Facility Construction 400,000 0 0 0 400,000 0 0 0 0 0 EnvCon Ketchikan - Baranof Reservoir Replacement 0 0 0 0 0 1,968,330 0 0 0 1,968,330 Commerce Ketchikan - Bethe Substation Replacement 5,000,000 0 0 0 5,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 Commerce Ketchikan - Cruise Ship Berth IV Traffic Signal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,300,000 0 1,300,000 Commerce Ketchikan - Fire Station No. 1 Replacement Project 5,000,000 0 0 0 5,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 Commerce Ketchikan - Replace Cruise Ship Berths I and II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10,000,000 0 10,000,000 Trans Ketchikan - Replacement and Rehabilitation of Municipal Bridges and 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 500,000 500,000 Trestles Commerce Ketchikan - Whitman Lake Hydro Project 1,000,000 0 0 0 1,000,000 0 0 0 0 0 Commerce Ketchikan Area Arts & Humanities Council, Inc.
    [Show full text]