DOCSLIB.ORG

In-Process Characterization Plan for the Building 886 Closure Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
In-Process Characterization Plan for the Building 886 Closure Project In-Process Characterization Plan KAISER. HILL COMPANY For the Building 886 .. Closure Project -. .. I RF'/RRIRS-99-349 Revision 0 .. RFlRM RS.99-349 Rocky Mountain RMRS Remediation Services, L.L.C. protecting the envimnrnent IN-PROCESS CHARACTERIZATION PLAN FOR THE BUILDING 886 CLOSURE PROJECT Rocky Mountain Remediation Services, L.L.C. October 1999 Revision 0 IN-PROCESS CHARACTERIZATION PLAN FOR THE BUILDING 886 CLOSURE PROJECT RFIRMRS-99-349 REVISION 0 October 1999 This in-Process Characterization Plan has been reviewed and approved by: - Date 4Y/& Date K6n Gillespie, HealtMnd Safety ’ Date r, RMRS Characterization Date IN-PROCESS CHA~4CTE2IZATION?LAN RFiRklRS-39-35 'W .I FOR THE a86 CLUSTER TOC. Page iii oi vi CLOSURE PROJECT Effective Date: lOiOliO9 IN-PROCESS CHARACTERIZATION PLAN FOR THE BUILDING 886 CLOSURE PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 .o INTRODUCTION ....................................... ...................... ................. 1.1 Purpose ........................................................... 1.2Scope ........................................... .................................. 1 2.0 CLUSTER DESCRIPTION .................................. .......................... 2 2.1 Summary of Existing Data ............................. ........................ 2 2.1.1 Radiological................................ .......................... 2 2.1.2Non-Radiological ......................... .......................... 3 2.2 Known or Suspected Data Gaps ......... 2.2.1 Radiological............................... .......................... 3 2.2.2Non-Radiological ................ 3.0 DATA QUALITY OBJECTIVES ............................. .................................................................. ....6 3.1 Radiological .............................................................................................................................. 7 3.1.1 Statement of the Problem...................... ............................................................. 7 3.1.2Identification of Decisions.................... .:. ..............:. ............................. 3.1.3Identification of Inputs to the Decisions ............................................ 3.1.4Definition of Project Boundaries ......................... 3.1.5Development of Decision Rules ................................ 3.1 51Decision Rule for Fixed and Removable Radiological Surveys ... 3.1.5.2Decision Rule for Paint Scrape Samples .............. 3.1 53Decision Rule for Concrete Core Samples .......... ........................... 8 3.1 5.4 Decision Rule for Roofing Core Samples .................................................. 9 3.1.6Limits on Decision Errors ........................................................................................... 9 3.1.7Optimization of the Sampling Design ......................................................................... 9 3.2 Non-radiological ........................................................................................................................ 10 . 3.2.1 Statement of the Proble.......................................................................................... 10 3.2.2Identification of Decisions........................................................................................ .l 0 3.2.3Identification of Inputs to the Decisions.................................................................... 11 3.2.4 Definition of Project Boundaries .............................................................. 3.2.5Development of Decision Rules ............................................................................... 11 3.2.5.1Asbestos ................................................................................................. 11 3.2.5.2PCBs ....................................................................................................... 11 3.2.5.3Lead and Metals ..................................................................................... 12 3.2.6Limits on Decision Errors ......................................................................................... 12 3.2.7 Optimization of the Sampling Design .............................................................. :........ 12 4.0 SAMPLE COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS ....................................................................................... 12 4.1 Radiological ............................................................................................................................. 13 4.1.1 Isotopic Swipe Samples ................................................................ :.......................... 13 4.1.2Media Samples ........................................................................................................ .17 IN-PROCESS CHARACTERIZATION PLAN 2iiRMRS-55-3d5 32~.3 FOR THE a86 CLUSTER TOG. Page IV of VI CLOSURE PROJECT Effective Date: 10iO1;09 TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued) 4.1.2.1 InteriorlExterior Pai ........................ 17 4.1.2.2 Concrete Core Sam 4.1.2.3 Roof Core Samples 4.2 Non-radiological................................................................... 4.2.1 Asbestos .................................................................... .......................................................................................... 18 4.2.3 Lead and Metals ................................................... 18 4.3 Sample Handling a 4.4 Documentation 4.5 PPE Evaluation .......................................... 4.6 QC Samples ....................................................................... 4.7 Sample Designation .......................................................................... 5.0 HEALTH AND SAFETY ........................................................................................................................... 21 5.1 Activity Hazard Analysis ......... .............................................................. .22 5.2 Monitoring ............................... ............................................................... .22 5.2.1 Chemical Hazard Monitoring ................................................................... 22 5.2.2 Radiological Hazard Monitoring ........................................................... 22 6.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE ........................................................................................................................ 23 6.1 Quality Assurance Program ....................................................................................................... 23 6.2 Training Requirements .............................................................................................................. 23 * 6.3 Corrective Action ......................................................................... ...................................... 23 6.4 Document Control ...................................................................................................... 6.5 Change Control ................... ;. ...................................................................................... 6.6 Procurement .................................................................................................................. 6.7 Inspection and Acceptance Testing ........................................................................................... 24 6.8 Management Assessments ...................................................................................................... .24 6.9 Independent Assessments ........................................................................................................ 24 7.0 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................... .25 LIST OF TABLES Table 2-1. Summary of Process Information and Initial Classification by RoomlBuilding In The 886 Cluster........................................................................................ .. ........5 Table 3-1. Surface Contamination Guideline Values ...................................................................................... 8 Table 4-1. Radiological Sampling and Analysis ........................................................................................... 14 . APPENDICES Appendix A - Sampling and Survey Instructions Appendix B - Building Media Sample Survey Forms Appendix C - U: Transuranic Survey Forms Appendix D - Sampling Records IN-?ROCESS CH.A8ACERIUTION ?LAN 2F1i3.1RS-29-339 2ev 0 FOR THE 886 CLUSTER TOC. Page v of VI CLOSURE PROJECT Effeaive Date iOiOi/99 ACRONYMS ADM Administrative Procedures Manual ALARA As Low as Reasonably Achievable AR Administrative Records ASD Analytical Services Division ASTM American Society for Testing Materials BIO Basis of Interim Operation CA Contamination Area CAM Continuous Air Monitor CCR Colorado Code of Regulations CDPHE Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental, Response, Compensation and Liability Act CFR Code of Federal Regulations CML Critical Mass Laboratory COC Contaminant of Concern DAC Derived Air Concentration D&D Decontamination and Decommissioning DCGL Derived Concentration Guidance Level DOE Department of Energy DPM Disintegrations per Minute DQO Data Quality Objectives EPA Environmental Protection Agency FIDLER Field Instrument for the Detection of Low Energy Radiation e FO Field Operations (Manual) FSSP Final Status Survey Plan FSSR Final Status Survey Report 9 Gram(s) HCA High Contamination Area HEUN Highly Enriched Uranyl Nitrate HASP Health and Safety Plan IPC In-Process Characterization .. IPCP In-Process Characterization
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Microstructural Characterization of a Canadian Oil Sand
    Microstructural characterization of a Canadian oil sand Doan1,3 D.H., Delage2 P., Nauroy1 J.F., Tang1 A.M., Youssef2 S. Doan D.H., Delage P., Nauroy J.F., Tang A.M., and Youssef S. 2012. Microstructural characterization of a Canadian oil sand. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 49 (10), 1212-1220, doi:10.1139/T2012-072. 1 IFP Energies nouvelles, 1-4 Av. du Bois Préau, F 92852 Rueil-Malmaison Cedex, France [email protected] 2 Ecole des Ponts ParisTech, Navier/ CERMES 6 et 8, av. Blaise Pascal, F 77455 Marne La Vallée cedex 2, France [email protected] 3 now in Fugro France [email protected] Abstract: The microstructure of oil sand samples extracted at a depth of 75 m from the estuarine Middle McMurray formation (Alberta, Canada) has been investigated by using high resolution 3D X-Ray microtomography (µCT) and Cryo Scanning Electron Microscopy (CryoSEM). µCT images evidenced some dense areas composed of highly angular grains surrounded by fluids that are separated by larger pores full of gas. 3D Image analysis provided in dense areas porosity values compatible with in-situ log data and macroscopic laboratory determinations, showing that they are representative of intact states. µCT hence provided some information on the morphology of the cracks and disturbance created by gas expansion. The CryoSEM technique, in which the sample is freeze fractured within the SEM chamber prior to observation, provided pictures in which the (frozen) bitumen clearly appears between the sand grains. No evidence of the existence of a thin connate water layer between grains and the bitumen, frequently mentioned in the literature, has been obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • High-Resolution Gamma Ray Attenuation Density Measurements on Mining Exploration Drill Cores, Including Cut Cores
    The following document is a pre-print version of: Ross P-S, Bourke A (2017) High-resolution gamma ray attenuation density measurements on mining exploration drill cores, including cut cores. J. Apl. Geophys. 136:262-268 High-resolution gamma ray attenuation density measurements on mining exploration drill cores, including cut cores Ross, P.-S.*, Bourke, A. Institut national de la recherche scientifique, centre Eau Terre Environnement, 490, rue de la Couronne, Québec (QC), G1K 9A9, Canada * Corresponding author, [email protected] Abstract Physical property measurements are increasingly important in mining exploration. For density determinations on rocks, one method applicable on exploration drill cores relies on gamma ray attenuation. This non- destructive method is ideal because each measurement takes only ten seconds, making it suitable for high- resolution logging. However calibration has been problematic. In this paper we present new empirical, site- specific correction equations for whole NQ and BQ cores. The corrections force back the gamma densities to the “true” values established by the immersion method. For the NQ core caliber, the density range extends to high values (massive pyrite, ~5 g/cm 3) and the correction is thought to be very robust. We also present additional empirical correction factors for cut cores which take into account the missing material. These “cut core correction factors”, which are not site-specific, were established by making gamma density measurements on truncated aluminum cylinders of various residual thicknesses. Finally we show two examples of application for the Abitibi Greenstone Belt in Canada. The gamma ray attenuation measurement system is part of a multi-sensor core logger which also determines magnetic susceptibility, geochemistry and mineralogy on rock cores, and performs line-scan imaging.
    [Show full text]
  • Hyperspectral Imaging for the Characterization of Athabasca Oil Sands Core
    Hyperspectral imaging for the characterization of Athabasca oil sands core by Michelle Alexandra Speta A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University of Alberta © Michelle Alexandra Speta, 2016 Abstract The Athabasca oil sands of northeastern Alberta, Canada, are one of the largest accumulations of crude bitumen in the world. Drill core sampling is the principal method for investigating subsurface geology in the oil sands industry. Cores are logged to record sedimentological characteristics and sub-sampled for total bitumen content (TBC) determination. However, these processes are time- and labour-intensive, and in the case of TBC analysis, destructive to the core. Hyperspectral imaging is a remote sensing technique that combines reflectance spectroscopy with digital imaging. This study investigates the application of hyperspectral imaging for the characterization of Athabasca oil sands drill core with three specific objectives: 1) spectral determination of TBC in core samples, 2) visual enhancement of sedimentological features in oil-saturated sediments, and 3) automated classification of lithological units in core imagery. Two spectral models for the determination of TBC were tested on four suites of fresh core and one suite of dry core from different locations and depths in the Athabasca deposit. The models produce greyscale images that show the spatial distribution of oil saturation at a per-pixel scale (~1 mm). For all cores and both models, spectral TBC results were highly correlated with Dean- Stark data (R2 = 0.94-0.99). The margin of error in the spectral predictions for three of the fresh cores was comparable to that of Dean-Stark analysis (±1.5 wt %).
    [Show full text]
  • 1994: Effects of Coring on Petrophysical Measurements
    EFFECTS OF CORING ON PETROPHYSICAL MEASUREMENTS. Rune M. Holt, IKU Petroleum Research and NTH Norwegian Institute of Technology, Trondheim, Norway ABSTRACT When a core sample is taken fiom great depth to the surface, it may be permanently altered by several mechanisms. This Paper focusses on possible effects of stress release on petrophysical measurables, such as porosity, permeability, acoustic velocities and compaction behaviour. The results are obtained through an experimental study, where synthetic rocks are formed under simulated in situ stress conditions, so that stress release effects can be studied in a systematic way. INTRODUCTION Core measurements provide important input data to petroleum reservoir evaluations. Uncertainties in reserve estimates and predicted production profiles may originate from uncertianties in core data. In addition to measurement errors, such uncertainty may be a result of core damage (see e.g. Santarelli and Dusseault, 199 1). By core damage we mean permanent alteration of core material so that the material is no longer representative of the rock in situ. It is important to distinguish here between core alteration, which can be repaired by reinstalling the in situ conditions, and permanent core damage. A general advice would be to perform any core measurement as close to in situ (stress, pore pressure, temperature, fluid saturation) conditions as possible. In the case of a damaged core, this does however not warrant a correct result. The focus of this Paper will be on unrepairable core damage, and where the damage is caused by a mechanical failure of the rock. We shall look briefly into mechanisms that may cause such damage, how permanent core damage may affect various petrophysical parameters, and how one may correct for or reduce such core damage.
    [Show full text]
  • Best Research Support and Anti-Plagiarism Services and Training
    CleanScript Group – best research support and anti-plagiarism services and training List of oil field acronyms The oil and gas industry uses many jargons, acronyms and abbreviations. Obviously, this list is not anywhere near exhaustive or definitive, but this should be the most comprehensive list anywhere. Mostly coming from user contributions, it is contextual and is meant for indicative purposes only. It should not be relied upon for anything but general information. # 2D - Two dimensional (geophysics) 2P - Proved and Probable Reserves 3C - Three components seismic acquisition (x,y and z) 3D - Three dimensional (geophysics) 3DATW - 3 Dimension All The Way 3P - Proved, Probable and Possible Reserves 4D - Multiple Three dimensional's overlapping each other (geophysics) 7P - Prior Preparation and Precaution Prevents Piss Poor Performance, also Prior Proper Planning Prevents Piss Poor Performance A A&D - Acquisition & Divestment AADE - American Association of Drilling Engineers [1] AAPG - American Association of Petroleum Geologists[2] AAODC - American Association of Oilwell Drilling Contractors (obsolete; superseded by IADC) AAR - After Action Review (What went right/wrong, dif next time) AAV - Annulus Access Valve ABAN - Abandonment, (also as AB) ABCM - Activity Based Costing Model AbEx - Abandonment Expense ACHE - Air Cooled Heat Exchanger ACOU - Acoustic ACQ - Annual Contract Quantity (in reference to gas sales) ACQU - Acquisition Log ACV - Approved/Authorized Contract Value AD - Assistant Driller ADE - Asphaltene
    [Show full text]
  • Best Practices for Shale Core Handling: Transportation, Sampling and Storage for Conduction of Analyses
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Review Best Practices for Shale Core Handling: Transportation, Sampling and Storage for Conduction of Analyses Sudeshna Basu 1,2,*, Adrian Jones 1 and Pedram Mahzari 1 1 Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, London WC1E 6BS, UK; [email protected] (A.J.); [email protected] (P.M.) 2 Department of Chemical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 7JE, UK * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 9 January 2020; Accepted: 12 February 2020; Published: 20 February 2020 Abstract: Drill core shale samples are critical for palaeoenvironmental studies and potential hydrocarbon reservoirs. They need to be preserved carefully to maximise their retention of reservoir condition properties. However, they are susceptible to alteration due to cooling and depressurisation during retrieval to the surface, resulting in volume expansion and formation of desiccation and micro fractures. This leads to inconsistent measurements of different critical attributes, such as porosity and permeability. Best practices for core handling start during retrieval while extracting from the barrel, followed by correct procedures for transportation and storage. Appropriate preservation measures should be adopted depending on the objectives of the scientific investigation and core coherency, with respect to consolidation and weathering. It is particularly desirable to maintain a constant temperature of 1 to 4 ◦C and a consistent relative humidity of >75% to minimise any micro fracturing and internal moisture movement in the core. While core re-sampling, it should be ensured that there is no further core compaction, especially while using a hand corer. Keywords: shale; drill core instability; micro fracture; clay minerals 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Addendum to the Surface Sediment Quality Evaluation Sampling and Analysis Plan/Quality Assurance Project Plan
    Two Union Square 601 Union Street, Suite 600 Seattle, WA 98101 tel: 206.292.2078 fax: 206.682.7867 Technical Memorandum To: Mark Adams, Washington State Department of Ecology Copies: Grant Yang and Pricilla Tomlinson, Washington State Department of Ecology Doug Ciserella and Mike Ciserella, Cantera Development, LLC From: Lynn Grochala and Allison Geiselbrecht, Floyd|Snider Date: February 6, 2019 Project No: Cantera-TOC, Time Oil Bulk Terminal PPA Re: Addendum to the Surface Sediment Quality Evaluation Sampling and Analysis Plan/Quality Assurance Project Plan This technical memorandum was prepared at the request of Cantera Development Group, LLC (Cantera) as an addendum to the Sediment Quality Evaluation Sampling and Analysis Plan/Quality Assurance Project Plan (SAP/QAPP) approved by the Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) in July 2018 (Floyd|Snider 2018). This addendum summarizes additional sediment sample collection and analysis for the former TOC Holdings Co. (TOC) Seattle Terminal Properties (the Site) located on W. Commodore Way in Seattle. Additional surface and subsurface sediment characterization will be performed on the Site property and in the vicinity of the Site in Salmon Bay. 1.0 PROPOSED ADDITIONAL SEDIMENT CHARACTERIZATION This addendum describes the collection of eight additional discrete surface sediment grab samples and two sediment cores. Refer to the attached Figure 1 for the designated sample locations. The locations of recently collected surface sediment samples (August 2018) and historical surface sediment locations (available in the Ecology Environmental Information Management System) are also shown on Figure 1 for reference. 1.1 Surface Sediment Grab Samples Five discrete surface sediment grab samples targeting the top 10 centimeters of surface sediments will be collected within the immediate vicinity of the Site, adjacent to the dock used for former TOC loading operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Curatorial Care of Concrete and Rock Drill Core Samples Obtained in The
    General TSC Recommendations for Curatorial Care of Concrete and Rock Drill Core Samples September 15, 2009 Rock and Concrete Core Samples obtained in the field should be handled in a manner that meets the needs and purpose of the exploration program, site conditions and the available mode(s) of transportation. For example, freezing conditions in the winter or direct sunlight and heat in the summer may have detrimental effects on the samples for use in specific tests. Therefore, a plan that is carefully thought out (including technical and common sense issues) and implemented is needed to handle the samples from the time they are retrieved to when they are delivered to the various users of the samples. There is no set way to handle concrete and rock samples at every job site, or for every project. Therefore, a sampling plan will need to be developed for each specific investigation which will best fits the site conditions, equipment, weather, material types, intended purpose(s) of samples, and type of transportation from the drill site to both the local storage area and any final destination. General guidelines that can be helpful for developing a sampling plan can be found in the following references. 1. USBR Concrete Manual 9th edition 1992 2. USBR Geology Manual, 2nd Edition, Volumes 1 and 2, 1998 and 2001 3. Geology Office Manual, April 1988 4. Electric Power Research Institute – Guidelines for Drilling and Testing Core Samples at Concrete Gravity Dams 5. ASTM Standard D-420 Standard Guide to Site Characterization for Engineering, Design, and Construction Purposes 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Influence of Vertical Location on Hydraulic Fracture Conductivity In
    THE INFLUENCE OF VERTICAL LOCATION ON HYDRAULIC FRACTURE CONDUCTIVITY IN THE FAYETTEVILLE SHALE A Thesis by KATHRYN ELIZABETH BRIGGS Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Chair of Committee, Ding Zhu Committee Members, A. Daniel Hill Michael Pope Head of Department, A. Daniel Hill May 2014 Major Subject: Petroleum Engineering Copyright 2014 Kathryn Elizabeth Briggs ABSTRACT Hydraulic fracturing is the primary stimulation method within low permeability reservoirs, in particular shale reservoirs. Hydraulic fracturing provides a means for making shale reservoirs commercially viable by inducing and propping fracture networks allowing gas flow to the wellbore. Without a propping agent, the created fracture channels would close due to the in-situ stress and defeat the purpose of creating induced fractures. The fracture network conductivity is directly related to the well productivity; therefore, the oil and gas industry is currently trying to better understand what impacts fracture conductivity. Shale is a broad term for a fine-grained, detrital rock, composed of silts and clays, which often suggest laminar, fissile structure. This work investigates the difference between two vertical zones in the Fayetteville shale, the FL2 and FL3, by measuring laboratory fracture conductivity along an artificially induced, rough, aligned fracture. Unpropped and low concentration 30/70 mesh proppant experiments were run on samples from both zones. Parameters that were controllable, such as proppant size, concentration and type, were kept consistent between the two zones. In addition to comparing experimental fracture conductivity results, mineral composition, thin sections, and surface roughness scans were evaluated to distinguish differences between the two zones rock properties.
    [Show full text]
  • National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report
    1:50,000 NTS Map Sheets 074E10, 074E11, 074E14, 074E15 National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report, Inferred Crush Rock Aggregate Resource Estimate with Updated Lease Boundaries for the Richardson Property, Northeastern Alberta, Canada Prepared For: Athabasca Minerals Inc. 4409 94 St NW Edmonton AB Canada T6E 6T7 Prepared by: APEX Geoscience Ltd. 8429-24 Street Edmonton AB Canada T6P 1L3 Roy Eccles, M.Sc., P. Geol. Steven Nicholls, BA.Sc, MAIG Effective Date: October 24, 2019 Edmonton, Alberta, Canada National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report for the Richardson Property, Northeast Alberta Contents 1 Summary ................................................................................................................... 1 2 Introduction .............................................................................................................. 12 3 Reliance on Other Experts ...................................................................................... 18 4 Property Description and Location ........................................................................... 18 4.1 Property Description......................................................................................... 18 4.2 Property Rights and Maintenance .................................................................... 19 4.3 Coexisting Oil, Gas and Oil Sands Rights ........................................................ 19 4.4 Land Use and Environmental Matters .............................................................. 19 4.5 Royalty Rates ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Observations of Naturally Occurring Hydrocarbons (Bitumen) in Quaternary Sediments, Athabasca Oil Sands Area and Areas West, Alberta
    Geo-Note 2002-01 Observations of Naturally Occurring Hydrocarbons (Bitumen) in Quaternary Sediments, Athabasca Oil Sands Area and Areas West, Alberta Alberta Energy and Utilities Board Alberta Geological Survey Observations of Naturally Occurring Hydrocarbons (Bitumen) in Quaternary Sediments, Athabasca Oil Sands Area and Areas West, Alberta L. D. Andriashek, P. Geol., and J. Pawlowicz Alberta Geological Survey May 2002 ©Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Alberta, 2002 The Alberta Geological Survey and its employees and contractors make no warranty, guarantee or repre- sentation, express or implied, or assume any legal liability regarding the correctness, accuracy, com- pleteness, or reliability of this publication. Any digital data and software supplied with this publication are subject to the licence conditions (specified in ‘Licence Agreement for Digital Products’). The data are supplied on the understanding that they are for the sole use of the licensee, and will not be redistrib- uted in any form, in whole or in part, to third parties. Any references to proprietary software in the docu- mentation, and/or any use of proprietary data formats in this release do not constitute endorsement by the Alberta Geological Survey of any manufacturer’s product. When using information from this publication in other publications or presentations, due acknowledg- ment should be given to the Alberta Geological Survey/Alberta Energy and Utilities Board. The follow- ing reference format is recommended: Andriashek, L.D. and Pawlowicz, J., 2002: Observations of naturally occurring hydrocarbons (bitumen) in Quaternary sediments, Athabasca Oil Sands Area and areas west, Alberta. Alberta Energy and Utilities Board, Alberta Geological Survey, Geo-Note 2002-01.
    [Show full text]
  • Core Sampling SECONDARY
    Core Sampling SECONDARY Materials Water in a dark Ruler light SOIL spray bottle Plastic spoons Aquarium GRAVEL 1 bag of dark sand 1 bag of light sand 1 bag of soil 1 clear plastic 10 clear 1 bag of small cup per student plastic straws gravel (8 ounce) Activity 1. Using the ruler to measure, add a 1 cm 2. Place another earth material 1 cm 3. Continue alternating layers of earth layer of one of the earth materials to the deep on top of the first layer. Moisten materials and water. The layers should cup and mist with the spray bottle of water with water until damp. be a total of 4 cm deep in the cup. until damp, but don’t soak. Layer the types of earth materials in any order you choose. 4. Use a straw to extract a core sample 5. Place your finger tightly over the top 6. Lay several core samples from different by pushing the straw straight down end of the straw and withdraw it from cups side by side. Compare results. through the layers of the cup. the cup. Observe the layers in the straw core sample. NOTE: Some students will hit rock and find it difficult to continue. Relate this to real-world drilling and why drill bits are used to churn up and break up rock in the sampling path. Explain to students that core sampling is one way that Explanation geologists determine the geologic formation of rocks and sediments when exploring for oil and gas. Ask students what core samples are and what petroleum geologists look for when they examine core samples..
    [Show full text]