Evaluating Methods to Restore Amphibian Habitat in Fire-Suppressed Pine Flatwoods Wetlands

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evaluating Methods to Restore Amphibian Habitat in Fire-Suppressed Pine Flatwoods Wetlands Fire Ecology Volume 9, Issue 1, 2013 Gorman et al.: Evaluating Methods to Restore Amphibian Habitat doi: 10.4996/fireecology.0901096 Page 96 RESEARCH ARTICLE EVALUATING METHODS TO RESTORE AMPHIBIAN HABITAT IN FIRE-SUPPRESSED PINE FLATWOODS WETLANDS Thomas A. Gorman1*, Carola A. Haas1, and John G. Himes2 1Department of Fish and Wildlife Conservation, Virginia Tech, 100 Cheatham Hall, MC 0321, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA 2Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, 3911 Highway 2321, Panama City, Florida 32409, USA *Corresponding author: Tel.: 001-540-250-8594; e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Although fire is recognized as an important disturbance in longleaf pine uplands of the southeastern US, less is known about the importance of fire or other disturbances in the wetlands embedded within this ecosystem. The reticulated flatwoods salamander (Am- bystoma bishopi), a federally endangered species, and other rare and declining amphibi- ans, are less likely to breed in low-quality wetlands with high canopy cover and low her- baceous groundcover that typically occur from fire exclusion. Fire rarely carries through these wetlands during winter because of the presence of standing water at this time of year. Our objective was to evaluate whether mechanical removal of the woody midstory could serve as a surrogate for fire, and create high-quality wetlands with moderate cano- py cover and high herbaceous groundcover. We chose a series of high-quality (n = 4) and low-quality (n = 21) ephemeral wetlands for study. A subset of the low-quality wet- lands were then treated mechanically and with herbicide (n = 8), burned (n = 4), or re- tained in a low-quality state (n = 7). Mechanical treatments reduced canopy cover (from 55.7 % to 41.4 %) to similar levels as high-quality sites (36.7 %); however, herbaceous groundcover did not increase (17.2 % post-treatment compared to 37.3 % at high-quality sites). Fire reduced the canopy cover (from 41.3 % to 33.0 %), and herbaceous ground- cover was similar (33.2 % post treatment) to high-quality sites as of four months post burn. More time will be required to assess the response of herbaceous groundcover and whether mechanical methods can be used as a surrogate for fire to restore amphibian breeding habitat. Identifying surrogates for fire could add an important technique to our management toolbox. Keywords: Ambystoma bishopi, amphibians, fire, Florida, reticulated flatwoods salamander, wetlands Citation: Gorman, T.A., C.A. Haas, and J.G. Himes. 2013. Evaluating methods to restore am- phibian habitat in fire-suppressed pine flatwoods wetlands. Fire Ecology 9(1): 96-109. doi: 10.4996/fireecology.0901096 Fire Ecology Volume 9, Issue 1, 2013 Gorman et al.: Evaluating Methods to Restore Amphibian Habitat doi: 10.4996/fireecology.0901096 Page 97 INTRODUCTION canopy cover and low herbaceous groundcover and understory) that do not support as high a The southeastern United States, historical- diversity of wildlife. Because high-quality ly dominated by longleaf pine savannas, was a wetlands and their ecotones within the longleaf landscape shaped by frequent fire (Stout and pine uplands harbor much higher wildlife di- Marion 1993, Frost 1995). After over a centu- versity (Kirkman et al. 1998, Hinman and ry of fire suppression, land managers currently Brewer 2007, Jones et al. 2010), it is important recognize the importance of fire to longleaf to understand how to retain or restore wetlands pine uplands (e.g., Provencher et al. 2001), but towards these historic conditions. there are still problems with implementing Fire (natural or prescribed) is necessary for fires in wetlands within this ecosystem (Bishop maintaining and restoring the habitat condi- and Haas 2005). Our research focuses on res- tions on which breeding amphibians in these toration of wetlands within longleaf pine sa- ephemeral depression wetlands depend (Rus- vannas for rare and declining amphibians in sell et al. 1999, Means et al. 2004, Bishop and the Gulf Coastal Plain of the Florida Panhan- Haas 2005). Reticulated flatwoods salaman- dle. In particular, our goal was to evaluate and ders breed in ephemeral wetlands with a well- identify management practices that would im- developed herbaceous groundcover and rela- prove breeding habitat for the reticulated flat- tively open canopy that are embedded within woods salamander (Ambystoma bishopi), a the longleaf pine system (Sekerak et al. 1996, federally endangered species that breeds in Gorman et al. 2009). Adult salamanders mi- ephemeral wetlands within the longleaf pine grate to the wetlands in late fall, and lay their ecosystem (Palis 1996, USDI Fish and Wild- eggs in the dry wetland basin. The eggs hatch life Service 2009). into aquatic larvae once winter rains inundate Fire has played an important role in wet- the wetland. The larvae feed predominantly lands in the longleaf pine ecosystem, but his- on aquatic invertebrates (Whiles et al. 2004), toric fire regimes of these wetlands are not as taking approximately 3 mo to 4.5 mo to grow well understood as those of the surrounding and develop (Palis 1995), and then metamor- uplands (Frost 1995, Kirkman 1995, Hinman phose into a terrestrial form in the spring. and Brewer 2007). Longleaf pine uplands are Complete reproductive failure occurs when thought to have been subject to low-intensity ponds dry before the larvae can reach meta- fires every 1 yr to 4 yr (Plattet al. 1988, Martin morphosis within this time frame. and Kirkman 2009). Ephemeral ponds that Frequently burned wetlands may be more were embedded in a fire-dominated landscape suitable for reproduction of flatwoods sala- were likely to have burned somewhat less fre- mander and other amphibians because frequent quently than the surrounding uplands, but prob- fire results in increased hydroperiod by reduc- ably at least every 4 yr to 10 yr (Frost 1995, ing woody vegetation, increasing herbaceous Kirkman 1995). These natural fires (i.e., from groundcover, increasing water temperatures, lightning strikes) were essential to maintaining increasing dissolved oxygen, and increasing the high-quality habitat conditions (open cano- invertebrate prey (important for larval sala- py cover and high herbaceous groundcover) manders) or algal growth (important for an- within this ecosystem, upon which most am- uran tadpoles) (deSzalay and Resh 1997, Skel- phibians and other wildlife species were depen- ly et al. 2002, Gorman et al. 2009, Sacerdote dent. However, exclusion of fire from wet- and King 2009, Shulse et al. 2012). Shortened lands, primarily from a shift to dormant season hydroperiod has negative consequences for prescribed fire when wetlands are inundated, amphibian reproduction in ephemeral wet- has led to low-quality habitat conditions (dense lands, and increased woody vegetation (be- Fire Ecology Volume 9, Issue 1, 2013 Gorman et al.: Evaluating Methods to Restore Amphibian Habitat doi: 10.4996/fireecology.0901096 Page 98 cause of increasing evapotranspiration) can re- ing. Moreover, because the dense woody mid- sult in shortened hydroperiods (Huxman et al. stories in these wetlands may be fire resistant, 2005). Several studies have demonstrated a as seen with other hardwood species (Kane et positive relationship between increased al. 2008), long-term frequent burning may be amounts of herbaceous groundcover and the necessary to restore herbaceous understory presence or abundance of larval amphibians vegetation (Waldrop et al. 1987, Brockway (Gorman et al. 2009, Shulse et al. 2012). Long and Lewis 1997, Brockway et al. 2005). periods without fire result in an accumulation A better understanding of the role of fire in of plant litter that can reduce dissolved oxygen maintaining wildlife populations was identi- below levels required by amphibians (Sacer- fied as one of seven key information needs for dote and King 2009). Removal of a woody longleaf pine restoration efforts (Brockway et midstory reduces canopy cover, allowing in- al. 2005). Here, we describe the short-term re- creased insolation and higher water tempera- sults from an ongoing adaptive management tures, and increased in situ photosynthesis, study. The goal of our current study is to de- which in turn allows more rapid growth and velop techniques to restore ephemeral wet- development of larval amphibians (Skelly et lands to enhance reproductive success of flat- al. 2002, Sacerdote and King 2009). woods salamanders and other winter-breeding Prescribed fire has been a widely used amphibians in a longleaf pine ecosystem. Be- technique for restoring habitat conditions to cause of the challenges of implementing grow- the longleaf pine ecosystem (Brockway et al. ing-season fire (see Knapp et al. 2009), we are 2005, Van Lear et al. 2005). As in the uplands, particularly interested in evaluating whether fire-suppression in wetlands within this system and how quickly alternatives to growing-sea- fosters the growth of invasive hardwoods that son fire can produce suitable conditions for results in the development of a dense woody amphibian breeding. midstory. In addition, there is a corresponding loss of the herbaceous component due to inad- METHODS equate sunlight reaching the ground to foster the growth of herbaceous groundcover (Martin Study Area and Kirkman 2009). Although there is some debate about the importance of burn season for Our study area was located on Eglin Air managing longleaf pine uplands (e.g., Palik et Force Base (Eglin) in the counties of Okaloo- al. 2002), season of fire clearly has implica- sa, Santa Rosa, and Walton in northwestern tions for management of seasonally ephemeral Florida, USA. Eglin is a large military instal- wetlands. In the Florida Panhandle, these wet- lation that spans 187 774 ha. The topography lands are typically inundated during the winter of the study area is level to rolling with the months, but are dry during the normal light- highest elevation at ~75 m, and slopes of up to ning season in the late spring and summer 30% (Eglin Air Force Base 2002). Most of the when the wetlands are most susceptible to upland habitat on Eglin is a longleaf pine burning (Bishop and Haas 2005; T.A.
Recommended publications
  • Trees, Shrubs and Vines of Huntley Meadows Park
    I 0 _Blueberry, Highbush----Vaccinium corymbosum Hickory, Sweet Pignut Catya ova/is (Walnut (Heath family) family) Box Elder (Ashleaf Maple) Acer negunda Holly, American----//ex opaca (Holly family) TREES, SHRUBS AND (Maple family) Honeysuckle, Bella----Lonicera be/la (Honeysuckle Buttonbush Cephalanthus occidentalis (Madder family) VINES OF HUNTLEY family) Honeysuckle, Japanese Lonicera japonica Cedar, Red----Juruperus virginiana (Pine family) (Honeysuckle family) MEADOWS PARK Cherry, Black----Prunus serotina (Rose family) Honeysuckle, Morrow----Lonicera Morrowii Cherry, Choke Prunus virginiana (Rose family) (Honeysuckle family) Huntley Meadows Park contains over 1,400 acres of Chokeberry, Purple---Pyrus floribunda (Rose Huckleberry, Black Gaylussacia baccata (Heath diverse habitat including meadows, wetlands and family) family) forests. Chokeberry, Red----Pyrus, arbutifolia (Rose Ironwood (American Hornbeam)----Carpinus This checklist is based on the observations of both family) caroliniana (Birch family) paid and volunteer staff. Special thanks to Karen Dangleberry----Gaylusaccia frondosa (Heath _Juneberry (Shadbush, Serviceberry)---- Goodlatte and Janet Meisenhelder. family) Almelanchier arborea (Rose family) Deerberry--- Vaccinium stamineum (Heath family) Lilac---Syringa vulgaris (Olive family) Alder, Smooth Alnus serrulata (Birch family) Dewberry, Prickly---Rubrus jlagellaris (Rose Locust, Black Robinia pseudo-acacia (Legume _Apple, Domestic Pyrus malus (Rose family) family) family) Arrowwood-- Viburnum dentatum (Honeysuckle Dogwood,
    [Show full text]
  • Native Trees of Georgia
    1 NATIVE TREES OF GEORGIA By G. Norman Bishop Professor of Forestry George Foster Peabody School of Forestry University of Georgia Currently Named Daniel B. Warnell School of Forest Resources University of Georgia GEORGIA FORESTRY COMMISSION Eleventh Printing - 2001 Revised Edition 2 FOREWARD This manual has been prepared in an effort to give to those interested in the trees of Georgia a means by which they may gain a more intimate knowledge of the tree species. Of about 250 species native to the state, only 92 are described here. These were chosen for their commercial importance, distribution over the state or because of some unusual characteristic. Since the manual is intended primarily for the use of the layman, technical terms have been omitted wherever possible; however, the scientific names of the trees and the families to which they belong, have been included. It might be explained that the species are grouped by families, the name of each occurring at the top of the page over the name of the first member of that family. Also, there is included in the text, a subdivision entitled KEY CHARACTERISTICS, the purpose of which is to give the reader, all in one group, the most outstanding features whereby he may more easily recognize the tree. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to express his appreciation to the Houghton Mifflin Company, publishers of Sargent’s Manual of the Trees of North America, for permission to use the cuts of all trees appearing in this manual; to B. R. Stogsdill for assistance in arranging the material; to W.
    [Show full text]
  • Black-Gum Ridgetop Forest This Community Type Occurs on Fairly Dry Ridgetops
    Black-gum ridgetop forest This community type occurs on fairly dry ridgetops. The canopy may be somewhat open; tree growth is somewhat suppressed. These ridgetops may have been exposed to repeated fires. Nyssa sylvatica is the dominant species; Betula lenta (sweet birch), Sassafras albidum (sassafras), Acer rubrum (red maple), Quercus montana (chestnut oak), Q. velutina (black oak), and Q. rubra (red oak) are often present. The shrub layer is dominantly ericaceous; common species include Kalmia latifolia (mountain laurel), Gaylussacia baccata (black huckleberry), Vaccinium spp. (blueberry), and Hamamelis virginiana (witch- hazel). The herbaceous layer is generally sparse. Common constituents include Carex pensylvanica (Pennsylvania sedge), Carex communis (a sedge), Epigaea repens (trailing arbutus), Gaultheria procumbens (teaberry), Aralia nudicaulis (wild sarsaparilla), and Pteridium aquilinum (bracken fern). Related types: This type is fairly uniform in composition and is restricted to ridgetops and high shoulders. The "Birch (black-gum) rocky slope woodland" occurs on talus or scree slopes and boulderfields, has an open canopy, and has a wide range of possible associates depending on aspect and location. Range: Ridge and Valley. Selected references: Daniel Devlin—personal communication. [Crosswalk: none.] Vascular plant nomenclature follows Rhoads and Klein (1993). Bryophyte nomenclature follows Crum and Anderson (1981). Species not native to Pennsylvania are indicated by a superscript "I." The aggressive species Phalaris arundinacea (reed canary-grass) and Phragmites australis (common reed) are marked with a superscript "(I)", as their native status is unclear. Pennsylvania species of special concern are indicated by a superscript "S." .
    [Show full text]
  • Designation of Critical Habitat for Frosted Flatwoods Salamander and Reticulated Flatwoods Salamander; Final Rule
    Tuesday, February 10, 2009 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Determination of Endangered Status for Reticulated Flatwoods Salamander; Designation of Critical Habitat for Frosted Flatwoods Salamander and Reticulated Flatwoods Salamander; Final Rule VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:17 Feb 09, 2009 Jkt 217001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\10FER2.SGM 10FER2 erowe on PROD1PC63 with RULES_2 6700 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 10, 2009 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR during normal business hours, at U.S. Register on or before July 30, 2008, with Fish and Wildlife Service, Mississippi the final critical habitat rule to be Fish and Wildlife Service Fish and Wildlife Office, 6578 Dogwood submitted for publication in the Federal View Parkway, Jackson, MS 39213. Register by January 30, 2009. The 50 CFR Part 17 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ray revised proposed rule was signed on [FWS–R4–ES–2008–0082; MO 9921050083– Aycock, Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and and delivered to the Federal Register on B2] Wildlife Service, Mississippi Field July 30, 2008, and it subsequently Office, 6578 Dogwood View Parkway, published on August 13, 2008 (73 FR RIN 1018–AU85 Jackson, MS 39213; telephone: 601– 47258). We also published supplemental information on the Endangered and Threatened Wildlife 321–1122; facsimile: 601–965–4340. If you use a telecommunications device proposed rule to maintain the status of and Plants; Determination of the frosted flatwoods salamander as Endangered Status for Reticulated for the deaf (TDD), call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at threatened (73 FR 54125; September 18, Flatwoods Salamander; Designation of 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Selected Provenances of Taxodium Distichum For
    EVALUATION OF SELECTED PROVENANCES OF TAXODIUM DISTICHUM FOR DROUGHT, ALKALINITY AND SALINITY TOLERANCE A Dissertation by GEOFFREY CARLILE DENNY Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY May 2007 Major Subject: Horticulture EVALUATION OF SELECTED PROVENANCES OF TAXODIUM DISTICHUM FOR DROUGHT, ALKALINITY AND SALINITY TOLERANCE A Dissertation by GEOFFREY CARLILE DENNY Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Approved by: Chair of Committee, Michael A. Arnold Committee Members, Leonardo Lombardini Wayne A. Mackay W. Todd Watson Head of Department, Tim D. Davis May 2007 Major Subject: Horticulture iii ABSTRACT Evaluation of Selected Provenances of Taxodium distichum for Drought, Alkalinity and Salinity Tolerance. (May 2007) Geoffrey Carlile Denny, B.S., Texas A&M University; M.A., The University of Texas Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Michael A. Arnold Taxodium distichum (L.) Rich. is a widely adaptable, long-lived tree species for landscape use. It is tolerant of substantial soil salt levels, but tends to defoliate in periods of extended or severe drought, when leaves come into contact with salty irrigation water, and tends to develop chlorosis on high pH soils. The purpose of this research was to identify provenances which may yield genotypes tolerant of these stresses. The appropriate name for baldcypress is Taxodium distichum (L.) Rich. var. distichum, for pondcypress is T. distichum var. imbricarium (Nutt.) Croom, and for Montezuma cypress is T. distichum var.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service
    Tuesday, February 10, 2009 Part II Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Determination of Endangered Status for Reticulated Flatwoods Salamander; Designation of Critical Habitat for Frosted Flatwoods Salamander and Reticulated Flatwoods Salamander; Final Rule VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:17 Feb 09, 2009 Jkt 217001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\10FER2.SGM 10FER2 erowe on PROD1PC63 with RULES_2 6700 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 26 / Tuesday, February 10, 2009 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR during normal business hours, at U.S. Register on or before July 30, 2008, with Fish and Wildlife Service, Mississippi the final critical habitat rule to be Fish and Wildlife Service Fish and Wildlife Office, 6578 Dogwood submitted for publication in the Federal View Parkway, Jackson, MS 39213. Register by January 30, 2009. The 50 CFR Part 17 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ray revised proposed rule was signed on [FWS–R4–ES–2008–0082; MO 9921050083– Aycock, Field Supervisor, U.S. Fish and and delivered to the Federal Register on B2] Wildlife Service, Mississippi Field July 30, 2008, and it subsequently Office, 6578 Dogwood View Parkway, published on August 13, 2008 (73 FR RIN 1018–AU85 Jackson, MS 39213; telephone: 601– 47258). We also published supplemental information on the Endangered and Threatened Wildlife 321–1122; facsimile: 601–965–4340. If proposed rule to maintain the status of and Plants; Determination of you use a telecommunications device the frosted flatwoods salamander as Endangered Status for Reticulated for the deaf (TDD), call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at threatened (73 FR 54125; September 18, Flatwoods Salamander; Designation of 2008).
    [Show full text]
  • New York State Stormwater Managment Design Manual
    Appendix H: Landscaping Guidance/Plant Lists H.1 Ponds and Wetlands For areas that are to be planted within a stormwater pond, it is necessary to determine what type of hydrologic zones will be created within the pond. The following six zones describe the different conditions encountered in stormwater management facilities. Every facility does not necessarily reflect all of these zones. The hydrologic zones designate the degree of tolerance the plant exhibits to differing degrees of inundation by water. Table H.5 at the end of this appendix designates appropriate zones for each plant. There may be other zones listed outside of these brackets. The plant materials may occur within these zones, but are not typically found in them. Plants suited for specific hydrologic conditions may perish when those conditions change, exposing the soil, and therefore, increasing the chance for erosion. Each zone has its own set of plant selection criteria based on the hydrology of the zone, the stormwater functions required of the plant and the desired landscape effect. The hydrologic zones are as follows: Table H.1 Hydrologic Zones Zone # Zone Description Hydrologic Conditions Zone 1 Deep Water Pool 1-6 feet deep Permanent Pool Zone 2 Shallow Water Bench 6 inches to 1 foot deep Zone 3 Shoreline Fringe Regularly inundated Zone 4 Riparian Fringe Periodically inundated Zone 5 Floodplain Terrace Infrequently inundated Zone 6 Upland Slopes Seldom or never inundated Zone 1: Deep Water Area (1- 6 Feet) Ponds and wetlands both have deep pool areas that comprise Zone 1. These pools range from one to six feet in depth, and are best colonized by submergent plants, if at all.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology and Morphogenesis of the Seed Cones of the Cupressaceae - Part I Cunninghamioideae, Athrotaxoideae, Taiwanioideae, Sequoioideae, Taxodioideae
    1 2 Bull. CCP 3 (3): 117-136. (12.2014) A. Jagel & V.M. Dörken Morphology and morphogenesis of the seed cones of the Cupressaceae - part I Cunninghamioideae, Athrotaxoideae, Taiwanioideae, Sequoioideae, Taxodioideae Summary Seed cone morphology of the basal Cupressaceae (Cunninghamia, Athrotaxis, Taiwania, Metasequoia, Sequoia, Sequoiadendron, Cryptomeria, Glyptostrobus and Taxodium) is presented at pollination time and at maturity. These genera are named here taxodiaceous Cupressaceae (= the former family Taxodiaceae, except for Sciadopitys). Some close relationships exist between genera within the Sequoioideae and Taxodioideae. Seed cones of taxodiaceous Cupressaceae consist of several bract-/seed scale-complexes. The cone scales represent aggregation of both scale types on different levels of connation. Within Cunninghamia and Athrotaxis the bulges growing out of the cone scales represents the distal tip of the seed scale, which has been fused recaulescent with the adaxial part of the bract scale. In Athrotaxis a second bulge, emerging on the distal part of the cone scale, closes the cone. This bulge is part of the bract scale. Related conditions are found in the seed cones of Taiwania and Sequoioideae, but within these taxa bract- and seed scales are completely fused with each other so that vegetative parts of the seed scale are not recognizable. The ovules represent the only visible part of the seed scale. Within taxodiaceous Cupressaceae the number of ovules is increased compared to taxa of other conifer families. It is developed most distinctly within the Sequoioideae, where furthermore more than one row of ovules appears. The rows develop centrifugally and can be interpreted as short-shoots which are completely reduced to the ovules in the sense of ascending accessory shoots.
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Duplications and Genomic Conflict Underlie Major Pulses of Phenotypic 2 Evolution in Gymnosperms 3 4 Gregory W
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.13.435279; this version posted March 15, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 1 Gene duplications and genomic conflict underlie major pulses of phenotypic 2 evolution in gymnosperms 3 4 Gregory W. Stull1,2,†, Xiao-Jian Qu3,†, Caroline Parins-Fukuchi4, Ying-Ying Yang1, Jun-Bo 5 Yang2, Zhi-Yun Yang2, Yi Hu5, Hong Ma5, Pamela S. Soltis6, Douglas E. Soltis6,7, De-Zhu Li1,2,*, 6 Stephen A. Smith8,*, Ting-Shuang Yi1,2,*. 7 8 1Germplasm Bank of Wild Species, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 9 Kunming, Yunnan, China. 10 2CAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Institute of 11 Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China. 12 3Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Plant Stress Research, College of Life Sciences, 13 Shandong Normal University, Jinan, Shandong, China. 14 4Department of Geophysical Sciences, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 15 5Department of Biology, Huck Institutes of the Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, 16 University Park, PA, USA. 17 6Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 18 7Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. 19 8Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 20 MI, USA. 21 †Co-first author. 22 *Correspondence to: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Nyssa Sylvatica Blackgum1 Edward F
    Fact Sheet ST-422 October 1994 Nyssa sylvatica Blackgum1 Edward F. Gilman and Dennis G. Watson2 INTRODUCTION Sourgum is a hardwood tree which grows to 75 feet tall, has a medium growth rate, pyramidal shape with horizontal branches growing from a typically straight trunk (Fig. 1). But the shape of the crown varies from tree to tree and, unfortunately, this is looked upon by some architects as undesirable. As the tree grows to 10 and 15-years-old, crown form becomes more uniform among trees. Lower branches droop with age and will need to be removed if used as a street tree. Growth habit is similar to pin oak, a tree which many people are familiar with. Providing a brilliant display of red to deep purple foliage in the fall, Sourgum surprises most people since it does not particularly stand out in the landscape until then. The small, blue fruits may be considered a litter nuisance in urban/suburban plantings but are quite popular with many birds and mammals, and they wash away quickly. GENERAL INFORMATION Scientific name: Nyssa sylvatica Pronunciation: NISS-uh sill-VAT-ih-kuh Figure 1. Young Blackgum. Common name(s): Blackgum, Sourgum, Black Tupelo for median strip plantings in the highway; reclamation Family: Nyssaceae plant; shade tree; specimen; sidewalk cutout (tree pit); USDA hardiness zones: 4B through 9 (Fig. 2) residential street tree; no proven urban tolerance Origin: native to North America Availability: somewhat available, may have to go out Uses: large parking lot islands (> 200 square feet in of the region to find the tree size); wide tree lawns (>6 feet wide); medium-sized parking lot islands (100-200 square feet in size); medium-sized tree lawns (4-6 feet wide); recommended for buffer strips around parking lots or 1.
    [Show full text]
  • (Taxodioideae), Cupressaceae, an Overview by GC-MS
    Article Terpenoids of the Swamp Cypress Subfamily (Taxodioideae), Cupressaceae, an Overview by GC-MS Bernd R. T. Simoneit 1,*, Angelika Otto 2, Daniel R. Oros 3 and Norihisa Kusumoto 4 1 Department of Chemistry, College of Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA 2 Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, Sektion Paläobotanik, D-60325 Frankfurt am Main, Germany 3 Consultant, 72 Marina Lakes Drive, Richmond, CA 94804, USA 4 Wood Extractive Laboratory, Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8687, Japan * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-541-737-2081 Academic Editor: Artur M. S. Silva Received: 16 July 2019; Accepted: 29 July 2019; Published: 21 August 2019 Abstract: The resins bled from stems and in seed cones and leaves of Cryptomeria japonica, Glyptostrobus pensilis, Taxodium distichum, and T. mucronatum were characterized to provide an overview of their major natural product compositions. The total solvent extract solutions were analyzed as the free and derivatized products by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry to identify the compounds, which comprised minor mono- and sesquiterpenoids, and dominant di- and triterpenoids, plus aliphatic lipids (e.g., n-nonacosan-10-ol). Ferruginol, 7α-p- cymenylferruginol, and chamaecydin were the major characteristic markers for the Taxodioideae conifer subfamily. The mass spectrometric data can aid polar compound elucidation in environmental, geological, archeological, forensic and pharmaceutical studies. Keywords: Cryptomeria japonica; Glyptostrobus pensilis; Taxodium distichum; Taxodium mucronatum; Cupressaceae; GC-MS overview; terpenoids 1. Introduction Natural products, especially terpenoids or their derivatives, are preserved in the ambient environment or geological record. When extracted and characterized by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) they are used by organic geochemists as tracers for sources, transport and alteration processes of organic matter in any global compartment [1–15].
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Opinion
    Biological Opinion Francis Marion National Forest Revised Land Management Plan FWS Log No.04ES1000-2016-F-0628 U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service December 2, 2016 Prepared by: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service South Carolina Ecological Services Field Office 176 Croghan Spur Road, Suite 200 Charleston, South Carolina 29407 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1. Ecosystems (not including rivers and streams) on the Francis Marion National Forest. FIGURE 2. Management areas on the Francis Marion National Forest. FIGURE 3. Red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) demographic populations on Francis Marion, spatially defined as aggregations of active clusters within 6 km (3.7 miles), and important areas (red arrows) to either establish or maintain demographic connectivity. FIGURE 4: Red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) Francis Marion population size and trend, active clusters. Data and graph prepared Mark Danaher, FMNF, 2014. FIGURE 5: Red-cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) Francis Marion population size and trend, potential breeding groups. Data and graph prepared Mark Danaher, FMNF, 2014. 2 LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1. Summary of Effects Determinations. TABLE 2. Fire-adapted ecosystems by Management Area. TABLE 3. Threatened or endangered species considered in this analysis. TABLE 4. American chaffseed (Schwalbea americana) monitoring trends from 1999-2016, Francis Marion National Forest. Data and table prepared by Robin Mackie, Forest Botanist/Ecologist, Francis Marion National Forest. TABLE 5. American chaffseed (Schwalbea americana) site prescribed burning trends, Francis Marion National Forest, 1996-2012. Data and table prepared by Robin Mackie, Forest Botanist/Ecologist, Francis Marion National Forest. TABLE 6. Roads and system type within Francis Marion managed cluster polygons.
    [Show full text]