Risks of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treatment with Glucocorticosteroids and Aminosalicylates
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2013 Risks of inflammatory bowel disease treatment with glucocorticosteroids and aminosalicylates Curkovic, Ivanka ; Egbring, Marco ; Kullak-Ublick, Gerd A Abstract: BACKGROUND: Glucocorticosteroids and aminosalicylates, mainly mesalazine (5-ASA), are both standard therapeutics in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. The gluco- corticosteroids are highly effective in inducing remission in both ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, but their use is limited by the high incidence and the potentially serious nature of adverse events. In an attempt to limit systemic side effects, rapidly metabolized corticosteroids such as budesonide have been introduced. The safety profile of aminosalicylates differs between the formulations. METHODS: We summarize the potential risks associated with glucocorticosteroid and aminosalicylate therapy in IBDs. RESULTS: The numerous adverse events of glucocorticosteroids, particularly at high doses and prolonged treatment, include opportunistic infections, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, ocular effects (glaucoma and cataracts), psychiatric complications, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression and increased frac- ture risk. Partially, these systemic adverse events occur with budesonide, which only has a low systemic exposure. The safety profile of 5-ASA is comparable to placebo and superior to the old aminosalicylate prodrug sulfasalazine, which had a significantly higher incidence of intolerance reactions including allergic rashes. Only in rare cases has nephrotoxicity such as interstitial nephritis been associated with 5-ASA. CONCLUSION: Considering the toxicity profile of conventional glucocorticosteroids, one primary goal of treatment in IBD should be corticosteroid-free remission. Therapy with budesonide may result in a better safety profile. 5-ASA treatment is usually well tolerated, but with regard to the rare nephrotoxic events, it is advisable to assess renal function before and during treatment with 5-ASA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000354699 Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-93477 Journal Article Published Version Originally published at: Curkovic, Ivanka; Egbring, Marco; Kullak-Ublick, Gerd A (2013). Risks of inflammatory bowel disease treatment with glucocorticosteroids and aminosalicylates. Digestive Diseases, 31(3-4):368-373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000354699 Adverse Events Dig Dis 2013;31:368–373 DOI: 10.1159/000354699 Risks of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Treatment with Glucocorticosteroids and Aminosalicylates Ivanka Curkovic Marco Egbring Gerd A. Kullak-Ublick Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich , Switzerland Key Words ic exposure. The safety profile of 5-ASA is comparable to pla- Glucocorticosteroids · Mesalazine · Inflammatory bowel cebo and superior to the old aminosalicylate prodrug sul- disease · Adverse events fasalazine, which had a significantly higher incidence of in- tolerance reactions including allergic rashes. Only in rare cases has nephrotoxicity such as interstitial nephritis been Abstract associated with 5-ASA. Conclusion: Considering the toxicity Background: Glucocorticosteroids and aminosalicylates, profile of conventional glucocorticosteroids, one primary mainly mesalazine (5-ASA), are both standard therapeutics goal of treatment in IBD should be corticosteroid-free remis- in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) pa- sion. Therapy with budesonide may result in a better safety tients. The glucocorticosteroids are highly effective in induc- profile. 5-ASA treatment is usually well tolerated, but with ing remission in both ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, regard to the rare nephrotoxic events, it is advisable to assess but their use is limited by the high incidence and the poten- renal function before and during treatment with 5-ASA. tially serious nature of adverse events. In an attempt to limit © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel systemic side effects, rapidly metabolized corticosteroids such as budesonide have been introduced. The safety profile of aminosalicylates differs between the formulations. Meth- Glucocorticosteroids ods: We summarize the potential risks associated with glu- cocorticosteroid and aminosalicylate therapy in IBDs. Re- Introduction sults: The numerous adverse events of glucocorticosteroids, Systemic glucocorticoids are effective at inducing re- particularly at high doses and prolonged treatment, include mission in both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s dis- opportunistic infections, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, ease (CD) [1–4] , whereas they are ineffective in the main- ocular effects (glaucoma and cataracts), psychiatric compli- tenance of remission in either illness [5] . However, their cations, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression use is limited by their frequent, various and sometimes and increased fracture risk. Partially, these systemic adverse serious side effects: the most frequent and most typical events occur with budesonide, which only has a low system- side effects concern the skin, such as thinning of the skin © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel Prof. Dr. med. Gerd A. Kullak-Ublick 0257–2753/13/0314–0368$38.00/0 Department of Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology University Hospital Zürich, Rämistrasse 91 E-Mail [email protected] CH–8091 Zürich (Switzerland) www.karger.com/ddi E-Mail gerd.kullak @ usz.ch Downloaded by: Universität Zürich, Zentralbibliothek Zürich 130.60.47.22 - 6/8/2016 3:47:43 PM or purpura. Steroids affect bone and can induce both os- and 6 mg) than in those who received placebo (RR 2.73; teonecrosis and osteoporosis [6] . They increase suscepti- 95% CI 1.34–5.57 and RR 2.88; 95% CI 1.72–4.82) [15] bility to various fungal, viral and bacterial infections [7] . but less common than in patients who received conven- Myopathy is an infrequent complication, typically pre- tional glucocorticosteroids for the induction of remission senting as proximal weakness of both the upper and low- in CD (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.55–0.78) [15] . er extremities and sometimes with atrophy and paresis [8] . Furthermore, steroids predispose to a range of psy- Glucocorticosteroids and Hyperglycemia chiatric complications such as depression, insomnia or Glucocorticosteroids are the most common cause of euphoria [9] . Cushingoid features with weight gain and drug-induced diabetes mellitus. More than 50% of pa- redistribution of body fat are often quite troubling to the tients who receive glucocorticosteroids at a dose equiva- patients. Besides, a relevant proportion of patients devel- lent of 40 mg prednisolone or more per day develop hy- op hyperglycemia. Especially if glucocorticosteroids are perglycemia [16, 17] . The odds ratio for the development used in combination with nonsteroidal anti-inflammato- of a new-onset diabetes mellitus is 1.36–2.31 [18] . Predis- ry drugs, the risk for peptic ulcer disease is significantly posing factors are a family history of diabetes, a hospital- increased. The impact of glucocorticosteroids on athero- ization in the preceding 4 months, a preexisting glucose sclerotic disease is supposed to be partly mediated by intolerance, obesity, higher age and most importantly changes in lipoprotein levels [10] . Ophthalmologic ad- dose and duration of glucocorticoid therapy. Glucocor- verse effects include both glaucoma and cataract (poste- ticosteroids induce hyperglycemia mainly through in- rior subcapsular cataracts are typical). Finally, if systemic creased insulin resistance. Typically, postprandial glu- glucocorticoids are stopped without adequate tapering, cose is elevated while fasting glucose concentrations are adrenal insufficiency may develop. often normal if glucocorticosteroids are administered In order to limit systemic toxicity, novel steroids with once daily. It is recommended to monitor random plasma limited oral bioavailability such as the second-generation glucose, typically in the afternoon or 1–2 h postprandi- glucocorticosteroid budesonide have been developed as ally. There are currently no published guidelines for the an alternative to classic corticosteroids. Budesonide ex- monitoring of plasma glucose in patients with inflamma- erts its local effects due to its high affinity to the glucocor- tory bowel disease (IBD) with glucocorticosteroid thera- ticoid receptor, which is approximately 200 times that of py, but at least at the start of therapy, it may be advisable prednisolone [11] . Budesonide has a limited systemic to check glucose not less than once weekly in patients who bioavailability of only 10–15% due to extensive first-pass receive high doses of corticosteroids and who have no or metabolism by cytochrome P-450 enzymes. But, potent only few risk factors for the development of steroid-in- CYP3A4 inhibitors such as macrolide antibiotics (cla- duced diabetes. In patients with several risk factors, glu- rithromycin, erythromycin) or azole antifungals (keto- cose concentrations should be tested at least once weekly. conazole, itraconazole) can increase plasma concentra- To treat hyperglycemia, oral antidiabetics such as metfor- tions to a relevant extent [12, 13] and consequently may min or sulfonylureas may be used if glucose concentra- increase the risk for systemic budesonide-associated side tions are <12–15 mmol/l. If concentrations are higher, effects. insulin therapy should