DOCSLIB.ORG

Length-Weight Relationship and Condition Factor of Orange-Spotted Spine Foot, Siganus Guttatus (Bloch, 1787), in Takalar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Length-Weight Relationship and Condition Factor of Orange-Spotted Spine Foot, Siganus Guttatus (Bloch, 1787), in Takalar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology Vol. 29, No. 4, (2020), pp. 5259 - 5276 Length-Weight Relationship and Condition Factor Of Orange-Spotted Spine Foot, Siganus guttatus (Bloch, 1787), In Takalar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia Basse Siang Parawansa1, Sharifuddin Bin Andy Omar1, Rohani Ambo Rappe2, Muhammad Natsir Nessa2, Moh. Tauhid Umar1 1 Fisheries Department, Faculty of Marine Science and Fisheries, Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar - Indonesia. 2 Marine Science Department, Faculty of Marine Science and Fisheries, Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar - Indonesia. E-mail: kukojsr65@gmail.com Abstract This research analyzed the length-weight relationship and condition factor of orange-spotted spine foot (Siganus guttatus) from Takalar District, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Samples were collected from February to July 2018, in the seagrass and coral reef ecosystems of Laikang Bay and Tanakeke Island. The samples were analyzed in the Fisheries Biology Laboratory, Fisheries Department, Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar. The 95 specimens collected from Laikang Bay comprised 61 male and 34 female fish, while the 1103 specimens from Tanakeke Island comprised 1066 male and 37 female fish. The regression coefficient (b) was in the range 1.482 – 3.099 for both male and female orange-spotted spine foot. On average, the condition factor of male orange-spotted spine foot was higher than that of females, except in the Laikang Bay seagrass ecosystem. Keywords: Condition Factor, Length-Weight Relationship, Siganus Guttatus, Takalar. 1. Introduction Rabbitfishes, members of the family Siganidae, are a group of fish commonly found in both coral reef and seagrass ecosystems. The Siganidae are a family with a single genus, Siganus, with two subgenera: Siganus with 24 species and Lo with 5 species [1], [2]. The Reference Collection at the Oceanology Research Centre of the Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI) contains specimens of 11 species, 10 from the subgenus Siganus and one from the subgenus Lo [3]. In South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia, 17 species have been reported, representing around 59% of all known Siganus species [4]. These include 16 species in the subgenus Siganus (Siganus argenteus, S. canaliculatus, S. corralinus, S. doliatus, S. fuscescens, S. guttatus, S. javus, S. lineatus, S. puellus, S. puelloides, S. punctatissimus, S. punctatus, S. spinus, S. vermiculatus, S. virgatus, and S. sutor) and one species in the subgenus Lo (S. vulpinus). One rabbitfish frequently encountered in the coral reef and seagrass ecosystems of Takalar District, South Sulawesi, is the orange-spotted spine foot, Siganus guttatus (Bloch, 1787). Local communities call this rabbitfish baronang binti’ or baronang buri’. According to FishBase, the global database of fishes, this fish has at least 99 common names in many languages. English language common names include orange-spotted spine foot, golden spine foot, gold-lined spine foot, golden rabbitfish, brown-spotted spine foot, and yellow-blotch spine foot [1]. There are also many no longer valid scientific names or synonyms [1], [5], reflecting the complex taxonomic history of this genus: Siganus stellatus (Forsskål, 1775), Chaetodon guttatus Bloch, 1787; Amphacanthus guttatus (Bloch, 1787); Teuthis guttata (Bloch, 1787); Amphacanthus concatenatus (Valenciennes, 1835); Siganus concatenatus (Valenciennes, 1835); Teuthis ISSN: 2005-4238 IJAST 5259 Copyright ⓒ 2020 SERSC International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology Vol. 29, No. 4, (2020), pp. 5259 - 5276 concatenata (Valenciennes, 1835); Siganus concatinatus (Valenciennes, 1835); Theutis concatenata (Valenciennes, 1835); Amphacanthus firmamentum (Valenciennes, 1835); Siganus lineatus (Valenciennes, 1835); Siganus corallinus (non Valenciennes, 1835); and Siganus hexagonata (non Bleeker, 1854). Compared to the white-spotted spine foot Siganus canaliculatus (local name beronang lingkis), information regarding the biology and reproduction of the orange-spotted spine foot S. guttatus in Indonesia is still very limited. Basic biological aspects of importance for fisheries management include the length-weight relationship and condition factor. Fish are often measured based on body length. In general, size, and especially length, is considered a key parameter from a biological perspective, as many ecological and physiological factors depend more on size than on age. Length is one of the most frequently used parameters in fisheries science and fish population dynamics [6]. However, from a fisheries management or conservation perspective, body weight is more important, as it is used to measure catch volume and estimate biomass [7], [8]. The weight (W) of a fish can be predicted based on fish length (L) because there is an exponential relationship between length and weight, which follows an equation of the form W = aLb. Linear regression of the logarithmic transformation of this equation (log W = log a + b log L) enables the calculation of the parameters an (antilog of the intercept) and b (slope, also called regression coefficient) [9]–[12]. Length-weight relationships are important in fisheries biology as the mean weight of a group of fish of a given length can be estimated based on the aforementioned mathematical formulae [13]–[18]. According to Froese et al. (2011) and Silva et al. (2020), the length-weight relationship is also heavily used in fisheries research and can be used in evaluating the growth pattern of a stock, estimating condition factor and biomass, providing valuable data to support sustainable fisheries management [12], [19]. One way in which length-weight relationships are particularly useful in fisheries red=search is to convert growth-in-length to growth-in-weight in stock assessment models, enabling biomass to be estimated from observations of fish length, and making it possible to compare fish growth between different locations [8], [20]–[23]. According to Ricker (1975), condition factor or the ponderal index provides a quantitative indication of the plumpness or well-being of fish [10]. As an indicator of plumpness, the condition factor can provide information on spawning readiness [24]. The condition factor is a parameter that is frequently used in fisheries biology. The condition factor is calculated based on the length and weight of a fish, and the value of this factor can be affected by sexual maturity, the availability of food sources, age, health and sex [11], [17], [25]. Laikang Bay and Tanakeke Island are two sites in Takalar District with seagrass and coral reef ecosystems in fairly good condition. These sites have long been used as orange-spotted spine foot (S. guttatus) fishing grounds by fishermen in the area. Due to the high fishing intensity, S. guttatus population abundance has declined at both sites. However, no data were available on the size distribution and growth patterns of these S. guttatus populations. Therefore, this research was conducted to provide data on the size distribution (length and weight), length-weight relationship, and condition factor of S. guttatus populations in both the seagrass and coral reef ecosystems of Laikang Bay and Tanakeke Island, Takalar District. 2. Materials and Methods 2.1. Time and Place This research was carried out over six months, from February to July 2018. Siganus guttatus samples were collected from fishermen operating in the seagrass and coral reef ecosystems of Laikang Bay and Tanakeke Island, Takalar District, South Sulawesi (Figure 1). For each specimen, total length and body weight were measured, and sex was determined, at the Fisheries Biology Laboratory of the Fisheries Department, Faculty of Marine Science and Fisheries, Universitas Hasanuddin, in Makassar. ISSN: 2005-4238 IJAST 5260 Copyright ⓒ 2020 SERSC International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology Vol. 29, No. 4, (2020), pp. 5259 - 5276 Seagrass species observed in Laikang Bay were Enhalus acoroides (density 21.99 ind./m²), Thallassia hemprichii (density 40.10 ind./m²), and Syringodium isoetifolium (density 2 ind./m²). At the Tanakeke Island site, only two seagrass species were observed: E. acoroides (density 28.6 ind./m²) and T. hemprichii (density 2.2 ind./m²). The substrate in the coral reef ecosystem of Laikang Bay was dominated by sand (68%), while in Tanakeke Island, dead coral algae were the most dominant substrate component (42%). Figure 1. Map of Takalar District Showing the Orange-Spotted Spinefoot (Siganus guttatus) Collection Sites 2.2. Data Collection Samples of orange-spotted spine foot were collected six times at intervals of one month. The samples were collected from each ecosystem in Laikang Bay and Tanakeke Island. The sampled fish collected were placed in a styrofoam box with crushed ice to keep the specimens fresh during transport to the laboratory. On arrival in the laboratory, the sampled specimens were removed from the box, cleaned, and placed on a dissection slate. Total length (from the tip of the snot to the tip of the tail fin) was measured using a ruler with a precision of 1 mm. Body weight was measured using digital scales with a precision of 0.01 g. The sex of each specimen was determined through dissection using a dissection kit (surgical scissors, scalpel, and tweezers); the gonad was removed and examined morphologically [26]. 2.3. Data Analysis The length-weight relationship was determined (by site and ecosystem) for all specimens combined and for each sex separately using the following equation [9], [10]: W = a L b or log W = log a + b log L (1) ISSN:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • SPECIAL PUBLICATION No
    The J. L. B. SMITH INSTITUTE OF ICHTHYOLOGY SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 14 COMMON AND SCIENTIFIC NAMES OF THE FISHES OF SOUTHERN AFRICA PART I MARINE FISHES by Margaret M. Smith RHODES UNIVERSITY GRAHAMSTOWN, SOUTH AFRICA April 1975 COMMON AND SCIENTIFIC NAMES OF THE FISHES OF SOUTHERN AFRICA PART I MARINE FISHES by Margaret M. Smith INTRODUCTION In earlier times along South Africa’s 3 000 km coastline were numerous isolated communities. Interested in angling and pursuing commercial fishing on a small scale, the inhabitants gave names to the fishes that they caught. First, in 1652, came the Dutch Settlers who gave names of well-known European fishes to those that they found at the Cape. Names like STEENBRAS, KABELJOU, SNOEK, etc., are derived from these. Malay slaves and freemen from the East brought their names with them, and many were manufactured or adapted as the need arose. The Afrikaans names for the Cape fishes are relatively uniform. Only as the distance increases from the Cape — e.g. at Knysna, Plettenberg Bay and Port Elizabeth, do they exhibit alteration. The English names started in the Eastern Province and there are different names for the same fish at towns or holiday resorts sometimes not 50 km apart. It is therefore not unusual to find one English name in use at the Cape, another at Knysna, and another at Port Elizabeth differing from that at East London. The Transkeians use yet another name, and finally Natal has a name quite different from all the rest. The indigenous peoples of South Africa contributed practically no names to the fishes, as only the early Strandlopers were fish eaters and we know nothing of their language.
    [Show full text]
  • Carapace Length-Body Weight Relationship and Condition Factor of Painted Rock Lobster Panulirus Versicolor in Sorong Waters, West Papua, Indonesia 1Yuni M
    Carapace length-body weight relationship and condition factor of painted rock lobster Panulirus versicolor in Sorong waters, West Papua, Indonesia 1Yuni M. L. Situmorang, 2Sharifuddin B. A. Omar, 2Joeharnani Tresnati 1 Master Program of Fishery Science, Postgraduate School, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia; 2 Aquatic Resources Management Study Program, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Corresponding author: S. B. A. Omar, sharifuddin@unhas.ac.id Abstract. Painted rock lobster (Panulirus versicolor) is a superior commodity with an important economic value, also being the most dominant species found in the waters of the Sorong region. Sampling was conducted from March to August 2020 in Tanjung Kasuari waters, Sorong City and Makbon waters, Sorong Regency. During the study, 365 lobster samples were captured from Tanjung Kasuari waters and 460 from Makbon waters. The results showed that in the waters of Tanjung Kasuari male lobsters had a hypoallometric growth pattern and female lobsters had an isometric growth pattern. The mean condition factors were 1.0049 for males and 0.9865 for females. On the other hand, both male and female lobsters in Makbon waters have a hypoallometric growth pattern with a mean condition factor of 0.9948 for males and 0.9875 for females. Key Words: spiny lobster, growth pattern, hypoallometric. Introduction. Lobster is a leading export commodity that has important economic value and has significantly contributed to the country's fishery sector and foreign exchange (Hasrun & Kasmawati 2018). Lobster is included in the genus Panulirus which has 21 species, 7 of which are found in Indonesian waters (Holthuis 1991; Chan 1998, 2010; Chang et al 2010; Ernawaty et al 2014; Wardiatno et al 2016; Wahyudin et al 2017a,b): P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fishes of Tristan Da Cunha and Gough Island (South Atlantic), and the Effects of Environmental Seasonality on the Biology of Selected Species
    ; 't- THE FISHES OF TRISTAN DA CUNHA AND GOUGH ISLAND (SOUTH ATLANTIC), AND THE EFFECTS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SEASONALITY ON THE BIOLOGY OF SELECTED SPECIES Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY of Rhodes University by TIMOTHY GILBERT ANDREW December 1992 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Numerous people have made this programme of fish research on Tristan possible and successful. The Tristan islanders have offered their utmost support for work in the field, both in gathering information and the collection of specimens. Their tremendous hospitality will not be forgotten. Jimmy Glass and his family are especially thanked for adopting us on Tristan and making us feel so much at home while on the island. Jimmy was also extremely helpful as a source of local knowledge and as a diving partner. The Administrator of Tristan during the period on the island, Mr Bernard Pauncefort, is thanked for his enthusiastic support and interest in our work. Captain Cecil Pohlman and his crew on the rock lobster vessel MFV TRISTANIA II were extremely helpful during the course of the research and their warm-hearted acceptance of myself aboard is greatly appreciated. Permission to work aboard this vessel and MFV HEKLA, granted by the owners, Tristan Investments (Pty) Ltd. was essential to the success of the project. Robin Matthews of the South African Meteorological Team at Gough Island (1988/89) is thanked for his assistance in collecting specimens. Billy Ranchod and Edward Matama of the J.L.B. Smith Institute of Ichthyology are thanked for their efficiency in handling the Tristan fish collection.
    [Show full text]
  • Peces De Uruguay
    PECES DEL URUGUAY LISTA SISTEMÁTICA Y NOMBRES COMUNES Segunda Edición corregida y ampliada © Hebert Nion, Carlos Ríos & Pablo Meneses, 2016 DINARA - Constituyente 1497 11200 - Montevideo - Uruguay ISBN (Vers. Imp.) 978-9974-594-36-4 ISBN (Vers. Elect.) 978-9974-594-37-1 Se autoriza la reproducción total o parcial de este documento por cualquier medio siempre que se cite la fuente. Acceso libre a texto completo en el repertorio OceanDocs: http://www.oceandocs.org/handle/1834/2791 Nion et al, Peces del Uruguay: Lista sistemática y nombres comunes/ Hebert, Carlos Ríos y Pablo Meneses.-Montevideo: Dinara, 2016. 172p. Segunda edición corregida y ampliada /Peces//Mariscos//Río de la Plata//CEIUAPA//Uruguay/ AGRIS M40 CDD639 Catalogación de la fuente: Lic. Aída Sogaray - Centro de Documentación y Biblioteca de la Dirección Nacional de Recursos Acuáticos ISBN (Vers. Imp.) 978-9974-594-36-4 ISBN (Vers. Elect.) 978-9974-594-37-1 Peces del Uruguay. Segunda Edición corregida y ampliada. Hebert, Carlos Ríos y Pablo Meneses. DINARA, Constituyente 1497 2016. Montevideo - Uruguay Peces del Uruguay Lista sistemática y nombres comunes Segunda Edición corregida y ampliada Hebert Nion, Carlos Ríos & Pablo Meneses MONTEVIDEO - URUGUAY 2016 Contenido Contenido i Introducción iii Mapa de Uruguay, aguas jurisdiccionales y Zona Común de Pesca Argentino-Uruguaya ix Agradecimientos xi Lista sistemática 19 Anexo I - Índice alfabético de especies 57 Anexo II - Índice alfabético de géneros 76 Anexo III - Índice alfabético de familias 87 Anexo IV - Número de especies
    [Show full text]
  • Metanephrops Challengeri) in the Bay of Plenty (SCI 1
    New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No. 42 2009 ISSN 1176-9440 Ecosystem indicators for New Zealand fisheries Ian Tuck Russell Cole Jennifer Devine Ecosystem indicators for New Zealand fisheries Ian Tuck1 Russell Cole2 Jennifer Devine3 1NIWA Private Bag 99940 Auckland 1149 2NIWA P O Box 893 Nelson 7040 3NIWA Private Bag 14901 Wellington 6241 New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No. 42 2009 Published by Ministry of Fisheries Wellington 2009 ISSN 1176-9440 © Ministry of Fisheries 2009 Tuck, I.; Cole, R.; Devine, J. (2009). Ecosystem indicators for New Zealand fisheries. New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No. 42. 188 p. This series continues the Marine Biodiversity Biosecurity Report series which ceased with No. 7 in February 2005. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...........................................................................................................................5 1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................6 2. FISH-BASED ECOSYSTEM INDICATORS......................................................................................7 2.1. Species based indicators (SpBIs) .................................................................................................7 2.1.1. Indicator or endangered species...............................................................................................8 2.1.2. Diversity ..................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Sitio Argentino De Producción Animal 1 De
    Sitio Argentino de Producción Animal 1 de 174 Sitio Argentino de Producción Animal PECES DEL URUGUAY LISTA SISTEMÁTICA Y NOMBRES COMUNES Segunda Edición corregida y ampliada © Hebert Nion, Carlos Ríos & Pablo Meneses, 2016 DINARA - Constituyente 1497 11200 - Montevideo - Uruguay ISBN (Vers. Imp.) 978-9974-594-36-4 ISBN (Vers. Elect.) 978-9974-594-37-1 Se autoriza la reproducción total o parcial de este documento por cualquier medio siempre que se cite la fuente. Acceso libre a texto completo en el repertorio OceanDocs: http://www.oceandocs.org/handle/1834/2791 Nion et al, Peces del Uruguay: Lista sistemática y nombres comunes/ Hebert, Carlos Ríos y Pablo Meneses.-Montevideo: Dinara, 2016. 172p. Segunda edición corregida y ampliada /Peces//Mariscos//Río de la Plata//CEIUAPA//Uruguay/ AGRIS M40 CDD639 Catalogación de la fuente: Lic. Aída Sogaray - Centro de Documentación y Biblioteca de la Dirección Nacional de Recursos Acuáticos ISBN (Vers. Imp.) 978-9974-594-36-4 ISBN (Vers. Elect.) 978-9974-594-37-1 Peces del Uruguay. Segunda Edición corregida y ampliada. Hebert, Carlos Ríos y Pablo Meneses. DINARA, Constituyente 1497 2016. Montevideo - Uruguay 2 de 174 Sitio Argentino de Producción Animal Peces del Uruguay Lista sistemática y nombres comunes Segunda Edición corregida y ampliada Hebert Nion, Carlos Ríos & Pablo Meneses MONTEVIDEO - URUGUAY 2016 3 de 174 Sitio Argentino de Producción Animal 4 de 174 Sitio Argentino de Producción Animal 5 de 174 Sitio Argentino de Producción Animal 6 de 174 Sitio Argentino de Producción Animal Contenido
    [Show full text]
  • DNA Barcoding for the Identification of Smoked Fish Products
    Journal of Fish Biology (2008) 72, 464–471 doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2007.01745.x, available online at http://www.blackwell-synergy.com DNA barcoding for the identification of smoked fish products P. J. SMITH*†,S.M.MCVEAGH* AND D. STEINKE‡ *National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research Ltd, Private Bag 14 901, Wellington, New Zealand and ‡Canadian Centre for DNA Barcoding, Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, 579 Gordon Street, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1 Canada (Received 11 July 2007, Accepted 17 October 2007) DNA barcoding was applied to the identification of smoked products from fish in 10 families in four orders and allowed identification to the species level, even among closely related species in the same genus. Barcoding is likely to become a standard tool for identification of fish specimens and products. # 2008 The Authors Journal compilation # 2008 The Fisheries Society of the British Isles Key words: DNA barcoding; smoked fish product; species identification. Identification of fish fillets usually requires the application of a molecular tool because most of the morphological traits used in species identification are removed during the filleting process. Early molecular identification methods relied on protein electrophoresis that became recognized as an official method for fish fillet identification (AOAC, 1990; Tenge et al., 1993; Yearsley et al., 1999). Proteins are stable in fresh and frozen product, but are denatured and damaged by heat and salt processing, and are generally not suitable markers for species identification in smoked and canned fish products (Sotelo et al., 1992; Unlusayan et al., 2001). Furthermore, closely related fish species may share protein profiles, precluding specific identification of product (Bartlett & Davidson, 1991; Smith et al., 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Ecosystem Indicators for New Zealand Fisheries
    New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No. 42 2009 ISSN 1176-9440 Ecosystem indicators for New Zealand fisheries Ian Tuck Russell Cole Jennifer Devine Ecosystem indicators for New Zealand fisheries Ian Tuck1 Russell Cole2 Jennifer Devine3 1NIWA Private Bag 99940 Auckland 1149 2NIWA P O Box 893 Nelson 7040 3NIWA Private Bag 14901 Wellington 6241 New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No. 42 2009 Published by Ministry of Fisheries Wellington 2009 ISSN 1176-9440 © Ministry of Fisheries 2009 Tuck, I.; Cole, R.; Devine, J. (2009). Ecosystem indicators for New Zealand fisheries. New Zealand Aquatic Environment and Biodiversity Report No. 42. 188 p. This series continues the Marine Biodiversity Biosecurity Report series which ceased with No. 7 in February 2005. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...........................................................................................................................5 1. INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................6 2. FISH-BASED ECOSYSTEM INDICATORS......................................................................................7 2.1. Species based indicators (SpBIs) .................................................................................................7 2.1.1. Indicator or endangered species...............................................................................................8 2.1.2. Diversity ..................................................................................................................................8
    [Show full text]