DOCSLIB.ORG

New Locality Record of Creobroter Gemmatus (Indian Flower Mantis

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New Locality Record of Creobroter Gemmatus (Indian Flower Mantis International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064 Index Copernicus Value (2013): 6.14 | Impact Factor (2013): 4.438 New Locality Record of Creobroter Gemmatus (Indian Flower Mantis / Jeweled Flower Mantis) in the Coastal Region of Contai / Kanthi and its Pattern of Mimicry in Relation to Behaviour Kallol Hajra1, Dr. Sumit Giri2, Prasanta Mandal3 Approved Part-Time Teacher) P. K. College,Contai,West Bengal, India Approved Part-Time Teacher) P. K. College, Contai, West Bengal, India Approved Part-Time Teacher) Ramnagar College, Depal, West Bengal, India Abstract: Indian flower mantis (Creobroter gemmatus) is observed during study period April 2014 to May 2015 from Contai/Kanthi, Purba Medinipur District, W.B. In this article, it is reported that this type of mantis is first time observed in the coastal region of Purba Medinipur district specially to Contai/Kanthi, West Bengal. The wings are green with a yellow eye shaped pattern. The male has a slightly duller coloration on the wings to the female. This type of Mantis also exhibit aggressive type of mimicry and this amazing animal is normally found on top of flowers where they can camouflage themselves and wait for their prey. The host plants of this species are Calotropis procera under family Asclepiadaceae and Pluchea indica under the family Asteraceae . Keyword: Creobroter gemmatus, Coastal region, Contai, mimicry, host plant. 1. Introduction 2. Materials and Method Creobroter gemmatus was first described by Stoll (1813). It Study Site is also called Asian Flower Mantis or Indian flower mantis or Jeweled Flower Mantis in India. The Indian flower mantis Kanthi: It is a small town, situated near the coastal area of is also occurring in Vietnam and South and Southeast Asia. Purba Medinipur district. The distance from Kolkata to There was no record from Purba Medinipur District on this Kanthi is 150km. The latitude and longitude of study site is mantis but now it is found in coastal area of Contai/Kanthi. 21050’N and 87048’ E. We study at the Soula and Junput Females can be cannibalistic but males are fairly communal. coastal region near the Kanthi Town. Cannibalism behavior among C. germmatus is more common than other flower mantis. In this article, we reported the ecology, behavior, and pattern of mimicry of C. germmatus. Figure 1: Location of study sites Volume 4 Issue 6, June 2015 www.ijsr.net Paper ID: SUB156097 Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 2742 International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064 Index Copernicus Value (2013): 6.14 | Impact Factor (2013): 4.438 Sampling Observation It is collected by hand picking and preserve in 70% alcohol. At first we observed this mantis on April 2014 near Soula This preserved specimen is kept into the museum of coastal region and secondly observed on May 2015 near the Zoology Department, P.K. College, Contai. Junput coastal region during day time simultaneously. Firstly it is found on Pluchea indica under the Family 3. Result Asteraceae and secondly found on Calotropis procera (Akanda Plant) . Systematic Position Creobroter gemmatus on Pluchea indica Plant Creobroter gemmatus on Calotropis procera (Akanda Plant) Conservation Status Morphological Features Not evaluated/Data deficient. 1) In male, abdomen is 8 segmented. 2) In female, abdomen is 6 segmented. Identifying Characters 3) In male wings are longer than abdomen but in 1) Eye spot present on fore wing. female it is shorter than abdomen. 2) Presence of green and white patches alternately on the 4) Presence of deimatic display of bright hind wings abdomen. that means pinkish color at the upper part and 3) Generally green to brown color. blackish color at the lower part are observed. 4) Presence of sharp claw at the proximity of first pair of 5) The base of the antennas is thicker in male than of thoracic legs. the female adult. Volume 4 Issue 6, June 2015 www.ijsr.net Paper ID: SUB156097 Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 2743 International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) ISSN (Online): 2319-7064 Index Copernicus Value (2013): 6.14 | Impact Factor (2013): 4.438 4. Discussion Ecology This type of mantis is found in tall grasses, dense or low vegetation, bushes, some plants having branches, twigs with bright flowers where different types of prey of it will be found. These are also found in damp areas. Their foods are variable such as Drosophila, flies, moths, cockroaches, crickets, butterflies etc. Camouflage and Mimicry Camouflage is the use of any combination of materials, coloration, or illumination for concealment, either by making animals or objects hard to see, or by disguising them as something else. So the animals use their colors to blend into the environment. Camouflage is a type of animal adaptation. On the other hand mimicry is related to camouflage, in which a species resembles its surroundings or is otherwise difficult to detect. So it is said that camouflage and mimicry are adaptations which help the Creobroter gemmatus for catch their prey as well as avoid and escape from predators. Therefore, this type of adaptation may be morphological, physiological or both. In this respect, it is said that coloration of Creobroter gammatus is an example of aggressive mimicry, a form of camouflage in which a predator's colors and patterns lure prey. The predator of flower mantises are bats and other animals, so they are colored to match with parts of plants such as flowers, twigs, leave and even grass to hide .All these phenomenon are also related to their behavioral pattern because their behavior are varies, but typically involves climbing a plant until they reach a suitable flower, and then staying still until a prey insect comes within range. The Measurement of Morphological Features: deimatic behavior is found in this animal which means any pattern of threatening or startling behavior, such as suddenly Table 1 displaying conspicuous eyespots, so as to scare off or No. of Body Length of Length of Length of Ist momentarily distract a predator, thus giving the prey animal Observation Length(inch) Fore hind Thoracic an opportunity to escape. Wing(inch) Wing(inch) Leg(inch) IST 1.6 3.0 2.7 2.6 References 2ND 1.5 2.9 2.5 2.5 [1] Chandra, K. 2009. Insecta: Mantodea. Fauna of Bandhavgarh Tiger Reserve (Madhya Pradesh), Conservation Area Series-40, Zoological Survey of India: 59-61. [2] Henry, G.M. (1932). Observations on some Ceylonese Mantidae with descriptions of new species. Spolia Zeylanica 17: 1-18. [3] Kirby, W.F. (1904). A Synonymic Catalogue of Orthoptera - Volume 1. British Museum, London, 224pp. [4] Mukherjee, T.K., Hazra, A.K. & Ghosh, A.K. (1995).The mantid fauna of India (Insecta: Mantodea). Oriemal Insects 29: 185-358. Volume 4 Issue 6, June 2015 www.ijsr.net Paper ID: SUB156097 Licensed Under Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 2744.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mantodea (Insecta), with a Review of Aspects of Functional Morphology and Biology
    aua o ew eaa Ramsay, G. W. 1990: Mantodea (Insecta), with a review of aspects of functional morphology and biology. Fauna of New Zealand 19, 96 pp. Editorial Advisory Group (aoimes mae o a oaioa asis MEMBERS AT DSIR PLANT PROTECTION Mou Ae eseac Cee iae ag Aucka ew eaa Ex officio ieco — M ogwo eae Sysemaics Gou — M S ugae Co-opted from within Systematics Group Dr B. A ooway Κ Cosy UIESIIES EESEAIE R. M. Emeso Eomoogy eame ico Uiesiy Caeuy ew eaa MUSEUMS EESEAIE M R. L. ama aua isoy Ui aioa Museum o iae ag Weigo ew eaa OESEAS REPRESENTATIVE J. F. awece CSIO iisio o Eomoogy GO o 1700, Caea Ciy AC 2601, Ausaia Series Editor M C ua Sysemaics Gou SI a oecio Mou Ae eseac Cee iae ag Aucka ew eaa aua o ew eaa Number 19 Maoea (Iseca wi a eiew o asecs o ucioa mooogy a ioogy G W Ramsay SI a oecio M Ae eseac Cee iae ag Aucka ew eaa emoa us wig mooogy eosigma cooaio siuaio acousic sesiiiy eece eaiou egeeaio eaio aasiism aoogy a ie Caaoguig-i-uicaio ciaio AMSAY GW Maoea (Iseca – Weigo SI uisig 199 (aua o ew eaa ISS 111-533 ; o 19 IS -77-51-1 I ie II Seies UC 59575(931 Date of publication: see cover of subsequent numbers Suggese om o ciaio amsay GW 199 Maoea (Iseca wi a eiew o asecs o ucioa mooogy a ioogy Fauna of New Zealand [no.] 19. —— Fauna o New Zealand is eae o uicaio y e Seies Eio usig comue- ase e ocessig ayou a ase ie ecoogy e Eioia Aisoy Gou a e Seies Eio ackowege e oowig co-oeaio SI UISIG awco – sueisio o oucio a isiuio M C Maews – assisace wi oucio a makeig Ms A Wig – assisace wi uiciy a isiuio MOU AE ESEAC CEE SI Miss M oy
    [Show full text]
  • Mimicry and Defense
    3/24/2015 Professor Donald McFarlane Mimicry and Defense Protective Strategies Camouflage (“Cryptic coloration”) Diverse Coloration Diversion Structures Startle Structures 2 1 3/24/2015 Camouflage (“Cryptic coloration”) Minimize 3d shape, e.g. flatfish Halibut (Hippoglossus hippoglossus) 3 4 2 3/24/2015 Counter‐Shading 5 Disruptive Coloration 6 3 3/24/2015 Polymorphism – Cepeae snails 7 Polymorphism – Oophaga granuliferus 8 4 3/24/2015 Polymorphism – 9 Polymorphism – Oophaga Geographic locations of study populations and their color patterns. (A) Map of the pacific coast of Colombia showing the three study localities: in blue Oophaga histrionica, in orange O. lehmanni, and in green the pHYB population. (B) Examples of color patterns of individuals from the pHYB population (1–4) and the pattern from a hybrid between Oophaga histrionica and O. lehmanni bred in the laboratory (H) 10 5 3/24/2015 Diversion Structures 11 Startle Structures 12 6 3/24/2015 Warning Coloration (Aposematic coloration) Advertise organism as distasteful, toxic or venomous Problem: Predators must learn by attacking prey; predator learning is costly to prey. Therefore strong selective pressure to STANDARDIZE on a few colors/patterns. This is MULLERIAN MIMICRY. Most common is yellow/black, or red/yellow/black 13 Warning Coloration (Aposematic coloration) Bumblebee (Bombus Black and yellow mangrove snake (Boiga sp.) Sand Wasp (bembix oculata) dendrophila) Yellow‐banded poison dart frog (Dendrobates leucomelas Fire salamander ( Salamandra salamandra) 14 7 3/24/2015 Warning Coloration (Aposematic coloration) coral snakes (Micrurus sp.) ~ 50 species in two families, all venomous 15 Batesian Mimicry 1862 –Henry Walter Bates; “A Naturalist on the River Amazons” 16 8 3/24/2015 Batesian Mimicry Batesian mimics “cheat” –they lack toxins, venom, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Predatory Behavior of Jumping Spiders
    Annual Reviews www.annualreviews.org/aronline Annu Rev. Entomol. 19%. 41:287-308 Copyrighl8 1996 by Annual Reviews Inc. All rights reserved PREDATORY BEHAVIOR OF JUMPING SPIDERS R. R. Jackson and S. D. Pollard Department of Zoology, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand KEY WORDS: salticids, salticid eyes, Portia, predatory versatility, aggressive mimicry ABSTRACT Salticids, the largest family of spiders, have unique eyes, acute vision, and elaborate vision-mediated predatory behavior, which is more pronounced than in any other spider group. Diverse predatory strategies have evolved, including araneophagy,aggressive mimicry, myrmicophagy ,and prey-specific preycatch- ing behavior. Salticids are also distinctive for development of behavioral flexi- bility, including conditional predatory strategies, the use of trial-and-error to solve predatory problems, and the undertaking of detours to reach prey. Predatory behavior of araneophagic salticids has undergone local adaptation to local prey, and there is evidence of predator-prey coevolution. Trade-offs between mating and predatory strategies appear to be important in ant-mimicking and araneo- phagic species. INTRODUCTION With over 4000 described species (1 l), jumping spiders (Salticidae) compose by Fordham University on 04/13/13. For personal use only. the largest family of spiders. They are characterized as cursorial, diurnal predators with excellent eyesight. Although spider eyes usually lack the struc- tural complexity required for acute vision, salticids have unique, complex eyes with resolution abilities without known parallels in animals of comparable size Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1996.41:287-308. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org (98). Salticids are the end-product of an evolutionary process in which a small silk-producing animal with a simple nervous system acquires acute vision, resulting in a diverse array of complex predatory strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Mimicry - Ecology - Oxford Bibliographies 12/13/12 7:29 PM
    Mimicry - Ecology - Oxford Bibliographies 12/13/12 7:29 PM Mimicry David W. Kikuchi, David W. Pfennig Introduction Among nature’s most exquisite adaptations are examples in which natural selection has favored a species (the mimic) to resemble a second, often unrelated species (the model) because it confuses a third species (the receiver). For example, the individual members of a nontoxic species that happen to resemble a toxic species may dupe any predators by behaving as if they are also dangerous and should therefore be avoided. In this way, adaptive resemblances can evolve via natural selection. When this phenomenon—dubbed “mimicry”—was first outlined by Henry Walter Bates in the middle of the 19th century, its intuitive appeal was so great that Charles Darwin immediately seized upon it as one of the finest examples of evolution by means of natural selection. Even today, mimicry is often used as a prime example in textbooks and in the popular press as a superlative example of natural selection’s efficacy. Moreover, mimicry remains an active area of research, and studies of mimicry have helped illuminate such diverse topics as how novel, complex traits arise; how new species form; and how animals make complex decisions. General Overviews Since Henry Walter Bates first published his theories of mimicry in 1862 (see Bates 1862, cited under Historical Background), there have been periodic reviews of our knowledge in the subject area. Cott 1940 was mainly concerned with animal coloration. Subsequent reviews, such as Edmunds 1974 and Ruxton, et al. 2004, have focused on types of mimicry associated with defense from predators.
    [Show full text]
  • About the Book the Format Acknowledgments
    About the Book For more than ten years I have been working on a book on bryophyte ecology and was joined by Heinjo During, who has been very helpful in critiquing multiple versions of the chapters. But as the book progressed, the field of bryophyte ecology progressed faster. No chapter ever seemed to stay finished, hence the decision to publish online. Furthermore, rather than being a textbook, it is evolving into an encyclopedia that would be at least three volumes. Having reached the age when I could retire whenever I wanted to, I no longer needed be so concerned with the publish or perish paradigm. In keeping with the sharing nature of bryologists, and the need to educate the non-bryologists about the nature and role of bryophytes in the ecosystem, it seemed my personal goals could best be accomplished by publishing online. This has several advantages for me. I can choose the format I want, I can include lots of color images, and I can post chapters or parts of chapters as I complete them and update later if I find it important. Throughout the book I have posed questions. I have even attempt to offer hypotheses for many of these. It is my hope that these questions and hypotheses will inspire students of all ages to attempt to answer these. Some are simple and could even be done by elementary school children. Others are suitable for undergraduate projects. And some will take lifelong work or a large team of researchers around the world. Have fun with them! The Format The decision to publish Bryophyte Ecology as an ebook occurred after I had a publisher, and I am sure I have not thought of all the complexities of publishing as I complete things, rather than in the order of the planned organization.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptations for Survival: Symbioses, Camouflage & Mimicry
    Adaptations for Survival: Symbioses, Camouflage & Mimicry OCN 201 Biology Lecture 11 http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2005/03/24_octopus.shtml Symbiosis • Parasitism - negative effect on host • Commensalism - no effect on host • Mutualism - both parties benefit Often involves food but benefits may also include protection from predators, dispersal, or habitat Parasitism Leeches (Segmented Worms) Tongue Louse (Crustacean) Nematodes (Roundworms) Commensalism or Mutualism? Anemone shrimp http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/ Anemone fish http://www.scuba-equipment-usa.com/marine/APR04/ Mutualism Cleaner Shrimp and Eel http://magma.nationalgeographic.com/ Whale Barnacles & Lice What kinds of symbioses are these? Commensal Parasite Camouflage • Often important for predators and prey to avoid being seen • Predators to catch their prey and prey to hide from their predators • Camouflage: Passive or adaptive Passive Camouflage Countershading Sharks Birds Countershading coloration of the Caribbean reef shark © George Ryschkewitsch Fish JONATHAN CHESTER Mammals shiftingbaselines.org/blog/big_tuna.jpg http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/images/cetaceans/orca_spyhopping-noaa.jpg Passive Camouflage http://www.cspangler.com/images/photos/aquarium/weedy-sea-dragon2.jpg Adaptive Camouflage Camouflage by Accessorizing Decorator crab Friday Harbor Marine Health Observatory http://www.projectnoah.org/ Camouflage by Mimicry http://www.berkeley.edu/news/media/releases/2005/03/24_octopus.shtml Mimicry • Animals can gain protection (or even access to prey) by looking
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Rapid Radiations of Insects: Challenges for Phylogenetic Analysis
    ANRV330-EN53-23 ARI 2 November 2007 18:40 Ancient Rapid Radiations of Insects: Challenges for Phylogenetic Analysis James B. Whitfield1 and Karl M. Kjer2 1Department of Entomology, University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61821; email: jwhitfi[email protected] 2Department of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2008. 53:449–72 Key Words First published online as a Review in Advance on diversification, molecular evolution, Palaeoptera, Orthopteroidea, September 17, 2007 fossils The Annual Review of Entomology is online at ento.annualreviews.org Abstract by UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS on 12/18/07. For personal use only. This article’s doi: Phylogenies of major groups of insects based on both morphological 10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093304 and molecular data have sometimes been contentious, often lacking Copyright c 2008 by Annual Reviews. the data to distinguish between alternative views of relationships. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2008.53:449-472. Downloaded from arjournals.annualreviews.org All rights reserved This paucity of data is often due to real biological and historical 0066-4170/08/0107-0449$20.00 causes, such as shortness of time spans between divergences for evo- lution to occur and long time spans after divergences for subsequent evolutionary changes to obscure the earlier ones. Another reason for difficulty in resolving some of the relationships using molecu- lar data is the limited spectrum of genes so far developed for phy- logeny estimation. For this latter issue, there is cause for current optimism owing to rapid increases in our knowledge of comparative genomics.
    [Show full text]
  • Intersexuality in the Holotype of Photina Gracilis (Mantodea: Mantidae: Photininae) and Its Taxonomic Implications
    ZOOLOGIA 31 (4): 408–411, August, 2014 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1984-46702014000400014 SHORT COMMUNICATION Intersexuality in the holotype of Photina gracilis (Mantodea: Mantidae: Photininae) and its taxonomic implications Antonio A. Agudelo R. Programa de Pós-graduação em Entomologia, Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia. Avenida André Araujo 2936, Aleixo, 69060-001 Manaus, AM, Brazil. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT. Parasitism by horsehair worms (Nematomorpha) in Mantodea is well known, but only a few cases of intersexu- ality were reported in the literature. In the present study, intersexuality of the holotype of Photina gracilis Giglio-Tos, 1915 is documented as a possible consequence of nematomorph parasitism. Photina gracilis and Photina laevis Giglio-Tos, 1915 are established as new subjective junior synonyms of Photina vitrea (Burmeister, 1838). The female holotype of Mantis (Cardioptera) gymnopyga Burmeister, 1838, which was associated and synonymized with P. vitrea, is recognized as a member of the genus Coptopteryx and the combination Coptopteryx gymnopyga (Burmeister, 1838) is revalidated. The substitute name Photina gymnopyga (Burmeister, 1838), instead of Mantis (Photina) vitrea Burmeister, 1838 (nec Mantis vitrea Stoll, 1813), is discarded and established as a new synonym of Coptopteryx gymnopyga. The name vitrea Burmeister, 1838 must be maintained until ruling by the International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature. KEY WORDS. Coptopteryx; Nematomorpha; parasitism; Photina; praying mantises. In nature, individuals do not always show a clearly de- (Stoll, 1813) (Hymenopodidae), and treated it as a case of mixed fined sexual dimorphism. When there is no morphological dif- gynandromorphy. ferentiation between male and female the organisms are usually As part of an ongoing review of the types of Neotropical called gynandromorphs or intersexes and, in many cases, the Mantodea in the main entomological collections and muse- choice is arbitrary (NARITA et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Mimicry: Ecology, Evolution, and Development
    Editorial Mimicry: Ecology, evolution, and development David PFENNIG, Guest Editor Department of Biology, University of North Carolina, Coker Hall, CB#3280, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA, [email protected] 1 Introduction 1879), multiple undesirable species (e.g., toxic species) converge on the same warning signal, thereby sharing Mimicry occurs when one species (the “mimic”) the cost of educating predators about their undesirabil- evolves to resemble a second species (the “model”) be- ity. cause of the selective benefits associated with confusing Mimicry is among the most active research areas in a third species (the “receiver”). For example, natural all of evolutionary biology, in part because of the highly selection can favor phenotypic convergence between integrative nature that the study of mimicry necessarily completely unrelated species when an edible species entails. Mimicry involves asking both functional ques- receives the benefit of reduced predation by resembling tions (it involves investigating, for example, the adap- an inedible species that predators avoid. tive significance of more versus less precise resem- Research into mimicry has a rich history that traces blance between models and mimics) and mechanistic back to the beginnings of modern evolutionary biology. ones (it also involves investigating, for example, how In 1862––a scant three years after Darwin had published mimetic phenotypes are produced). Thus, mimicry re- The Origin of Species––Henry Walter Bates (1862), an search draws on diverse fields, many of which are on English explorer and naturalist, first suggested that close the cutting edge of biological research. Indeed, as Bro- resemblances between unrelated species could evolve as die and Brodie (2004, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Deceptive Coloration - Natureworks 01/04/20, 11:58 AM
    Deceptive Coloration - NatureWorks 01/04/20, 11:58 AM Deceptive Coloration Deceptive coloration is when an organism's color Mimicry fools either its predators or its prey. There are two Some animals and plants look like other things -- types of deceptive coloration: camouflage and they mimic them. Mimicry is another type of mimicry. deceptive coloration. It can protect the mimic from Camouflage predators or hide the mimic from prey. If mimicry was a play, there would be three characters. The Model - the species or object that is copied. The Mimic - looks and acts like another species or object. The Dupe- the tricked predator or prey. The poisonous Camouflage helps an organism blend in with its coral snake surroundings. Camouflage can be colors or and the patterns or both. When organisms are harmless camouflaged, they are harder to find. This means king snake predators have to spend a longer time finding can look a them. That's a waste of energy! When a predator is lot alike. camouflaged, it makes it easier to sneak up on or Predators surprise its prey. will avoid Blending In: Stripes or Solids? the king snake because they think it is poisonous. This type There are of mimicry is called Batesian mimicry. In lots of Batesian mimicry a harmless species mimics a different toxic or dangerous species. examples of The viceroy butterfly and monarch butterfly were once thought to camouflage. Some colors and patterns help exhibit animals blend into areas with light and shadow. Batesian The tiger's stripes help it blend into tall grass. Its mimicry golden brown strips blend in with the grass and the where a dark brown and black stripes merge with darker harmless shadows.
    [Show full text]
  • A Specialised Hunting Strategy Used to Overcome Dangerous Spider Prey
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Nest usurpation: a specialised hunting strategy used to overcome dangerous spider prey Received: 18 January 2019 Ondřej Michálek 1, Yael Lubin 2 & Stano Pekár 1 Accepted: 14 March 2019 Hunting other predators is dangerous, as the tables can turn and the hunter may become the hunted. Published: xx xx xxxx Specialized araneophagic (spider eating) predators have evolved intriguing hunting strategies that allow them to invade spiders’ webs by adopting a stealthy approach or using aggressive mimicry. Here, we present a newly discovered, specialized hunting strategy of the araneophagic spider Poecilochroa senilis (Araneae: Gnaphosidae), which forces its way into the silk retreat of the potential spider prey and immobilizes it by swathing gluey silk onto its forelegs and mouthparts. Poecilochroa senilis has been reported from the nests of a several, often large, spider species in the Negev desert (Israel), suggesting specialization on spiders as prey. Nevertheless, in laboratory experiments, we found that P. senilis has a wider trophic niche, and fed readily on several small insect species. The specialized nest-invading attack was used more frequently with large spiders, and even small juvenile P. senilis were able to attack and subdue larger spiders. Our observations show that specifc hunting tactics, like nest usurpation, allow specialized predators to overcome defences of dangerous prey. Evolutionary arms races between prey and predators lead to the evolution of various defence mechanisms of the prey and counter-adaptations of predators to subdue such a prey1. Predator-prey arms races are ofen asym- metrical, as a prey organism is under stronger selection pressure2.
    [Show full text]
  • Creobroter Gemmatus? Can They Explain the Peculiar Behaviour of the Male? If So Phil Bragg and Myself Would Love to Hear an Explanation
    ISSN 1364-3193 Mantis Study Group Newsletter 11 February 1999 Newsletter Editor Membership Secretary Phil Bragg Paul Taylor 8 The Lane 24 Forge Road Awsworth Shustoke Nottingham Coleshill NGl62QP Birmingham B46 2AD Editorial Yesterday I started with "As you will probably have noticed already, this issue is rather thin.". However, an hour later the postman delivered an article from Martin Rowley so I quickly phoned him and asked him to send me a copy on disk. Martin's disk arrived this morning, and by coincidence a disk from Andy Lasebny arrived in the same mail delivery. The result of this is that the newsletter has doubled in size this morning! Despite the doubling in size, this newsletter is still rather thin, so please will everyone try to write something for the newsletter. Without your contributions there will not be a newsletter! Exhibitions The next scheduled exhibition for which we have a stand booked is Kettering Insect Fair on Sunday March 21 st. Other dates to note are: West of England Creepy Crawly Show, Newton Abbot racecourse, Devon. Saturday 10th July 1999 and Sunday 21st November 1999. British Tarantula Society Show, Wood Green High School, Wood Green Road, Wenesbury, West Midlands (2 minutes from J9 of the M6) from 1030 to about 1630 on Sunday 16th May 1999. Oldham Creepy Crawly Show, Queen Elizabeth Hall, Oldham. Open 1200-1700, 6th June 1999. Adults £1.00, children free. We have not booked a table for this, if anyone wants to run a stand for the MSG at this event please contact me for more details.
    [Show full text]