DOCSLIB.ORG

Sutter County General Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sutter County General Plan Sutter County General Plan Adopted by Sutter County Board of Supervisors on March 29, 2011 Resolution No. 11-029 Sutter County General Plan Adopted by Sutter County Board of Supervisors on March 29, 2011 Resolution No. 11-029 Prepared by Sutter County In consultation with Atkins (formerly PBS&J) DKS Associates West Yost Associates Willdan Financial Services ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Acknowledgments BOARD OF SUPERVISORS District 1: Larry Montna District 4: Jim Whiteaker District 2: Stan Cleveland District 5: James Gallagher District 3: Larry Munger PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS J.R. Griffin, District 1 Tom Engler, District 5 John Shaffer, District 2 Jana Shannon, District 5* Jose Flores, District 2* Felicity Clark, City of Live Oak Paul Basi, District 3 Annette Bertolini, City of Live Oak* Tejinder Dosanjh, District 4 John Sanbrook, City of Yuba City GENERAL PLAN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (GPAC) MEMBERS Melinda M. Russell Kulwant S. Johl Richard Libby Virgil Atkinson Gurvinder Pamma Leslie G. Mc Bride* Wade Arnold Judy Morris Greg Quilty Bob Harlan Maynard Dunn John Ochipinti Mike Darnell Jon Munger Byron Shinkle Stephen M. Brammer* Walter Ziegenmeyer Brynda Stranix Daniel Cucchi Tej Maan Russ Clark Judy K. Richards* Mandeep Singh Mundi* Gary Baland Chris Hrones Sarb Basrai** Tara Atkinson Brocker Satwant Takhar** Edmund C. Smith Brian J. Fedora** Sarbjit S. Thiara Joginder S. Paradesi Cheema* Cory D. Wilkins James L. Finstad** AGRICULTURAL FOCUS COMMITTEE MEMBERS Sam Nevis Jack Poukish Ann Chesini Casey Hoppin Matt Conant Ram Dhanota James Akin Amarjit Sohal Steve Danna Brian Fedora Sunny Dale* COUNTY STAFF Lisa Purvis Wilson, Planning Manager Jarvis Jones, GIS Analyst Steve Geiger, Principal Planner SUTTER COUNTY iii GENERAL PLAN ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CONSULTANT TEAM Atkins (formerly PBS&J) Dan Dameron, Project Director Maggie Visser, GIS Harriet Lai Ross, Project Manager James Songco, Graphics Tracey Ferguson, Deputy Project Manager Joel Miller, Document Production DKS Associates (Mobilty) Pelle Clarke, Senior Engineer Britt Fugitt, Travel Demand Modeler Mike Mauch, Senior Transportation Data Analyst West Yost Associates (Infrastructure) Douglas T. Moore, Engineering Manager Heidi Provencher, Associate Engineer Mark O. Kubik, Principal Engineer Willdan Financial Services (Economic Development/Fiscal) Eric Nickell, Principal Consultant Nicholas Arevalo, Analyst Jonathan Young, Senior Project Analyst * Former member ** Alternates GENERAL PLAN iv SUTTER COUNTY Contents Acknowledgments ...................................................................................... iii CHAPTER 1 Introduction ............................................................................ 1-1 General Plan Overview ........................................................... 1-1 What Is a General Plan? .................................................... 1-1 General Plan Organization and Format .......................... 1-2 Implementation and Administration ................................ 1-3 The Planning Area .................................................................... 1-5 Regional Context ................................................................ 1-5 Sutter County Profile ........................................................... 1-5 General Plan Update Process ................................................ 1-8 Key Steps and Documents ................................................ 1-8 Public Outreach ................................................................ 1-11 Related Documents ............................................................... 1-12 Technical Background Report ........................................ 1-12 Environmental Impact Report ......................................... 1-12 Climate Action Plan .......................................................... 1-12 CHAPTER 2 Vision ...................................................................................... 2-1 A Vision for Sutter County’s Future ........................................ 2-1 CHAPTER 3 Land Use ................................................................................. 3-1 The Land Use Plan .................................................................... 3-2 Conservation and Growth Areas ..................................... 3-2 Land Use Designations and Standards ............................ 3-6 Development Capacity ................................................... 3-19 Goals and Policies .................................................................. 3-21 Countywide Land Use ...................................................... 3-21 Agriculture and Open Space ......................................... 3-24 Rural Communities ............................................................ 3-25 Growth Areas—General Growth .................................... 3-26 Growth Areas—Cities’ Spheres of Influence ................. 3-31 Growth Areas—Rural Planned Communities ............... 3-32 Growth Areas—Industrial/Commercial and Employment Corridor ................................................ 3-35 Growth Areas—Sutter Pointe ........................................... 3-37 Governmental Uses and Coordination ......................... 3-40 Implementation ...................................................................... 3-41 CHAPTER 4 Agricultural Resources .......................................................... 4-1 Goals and Policies .................................................................... 4-3 Agricultural Lands................................................................ 4-3 Use and Operational Conflicts ......................................... 4-6 Natural Resources for Agriculture (Sustainability) .............................................................. 4-7 Agricultural Industries .......................................................... 4-9 Visitor Services (Agri-tourism) ........................................... 4-11 SUTTER COUNTY v GENERAL PLAN CONTENTS Implementation ...................................................................... 4-12 CHAPTER 5 Economic Development ....................................................... 5-1 Goals and Policies .................................................................... 5-2 Fiscal Management ............................................................ 5-2 Business Outreach ............................................................... 5-3 Work Force Development .................................................. 5-4 Economic Diversity .............................................................. 5-4 Implementation ........................................................................ 5-5 CHAPTER 6 Mobility ................................................................................... 6-1 Goals and Policies .................................................................... 6-9 Multimodal Transportation Network ................................. 6-9 Streets and Highways .......................................................... 6-9 Transit ................................................................................... 6-11 Rail Transportation ............................................................. 6-12 Bikeways and Pedestrians ................................................ 6-13 Air Travel and Airports ....................................................... 6-13 Greenhouse Gas Reduction ............................................ 6-14 Implementation ...................................................................... 6-15 CHAPTER 7 Infrastructure .......................................................................... 7-1 Goals and Policies .................................................................... 7-2 Water ..................................................................................... 7-2 Wastewater .......................................................................... 7-4 Stormwater ........................................................................... 7-6 Solid Waste ........................................................................... 7-8 Energy .................................................................................... 7-9 Telecommunications ......................................................... 7-10 Implementation ...................................................................... 7-10 CHAPTER 8 Public Services ....................................................................... 8-1 Goals and Policies .................................................................... 8-2 Law Enforcement ................................................................ 8-2 Fire Protection—Fire Services ............................................. 8-3 Fire Protection—Wildland Fire Hazard .............................. 8-4 Schools .................................................................................. 8-5 Libraries .................................................................................. 8-6 Parks and Recreation .......................................................... 8-7 Recreational Trails ................................................................ 8-8 Civic and Cultural Facilities ................................................ 8-9 Implementation ...................................................................... 8-10 CHAPTER 9 Environmental Resources ...................................................... 9-1 Goals and Policies .................................................................... 9-5 Biological Resources and Open Space ..........................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TYPICAL VALLEY INDIAN HOMES Vol. 2 No. 11 YUBA CITY, CALIFORNIA
    Vol. 2 No. 11 YUBA CITY, CALIFORNIA OCTOBER 17 1961 TYPICAL VALLEY INDIAN HOMES SUTTER COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY FALL MEETING OCTOBER 17, 1961 TUESDAY EVENING — 8 P.M. PLACE: Board of Supervisors Chambers County Office Building, 2nd Street PRESIDENT: Mrs. Florence Arritt PROGRAM CHAIRMAN: Randolph Schnabel PROGRAM SPEAKER: Waddell F. Smith President, National Pony Express Centennial Association TOPIC: The History of the Pony Express and Its Centennial BOARD OF DIRECTORS MINUTES October 5, 1961 The Board of Directors of Sutter County Historical Society met in regular session October 5, 1961 at 7:30 P.M. in the office of the County Superintendent. The meeting was called to order by Vice President, Mrs. Ida Littlejohn in the absence of the president, Mrs. Florence Arritt. Mrs. Arritt is on her vacation traveling in the southwest and visiting many spots of historic interest such as Tombstone, Arizona. The minutes of the July Board meeting and regular meeting were read and approved. The treasurer reported cash in the bank $737.33. Film Fund $447.00 and general fund $290.33. Mr. Ramey reported a membership of 111. Fifteen new members were secured at the county fair booth. The following bills were approved for payment: Valley Print Shop — Membership Cards, Stationery $41.70. County of Sutter — Bulletin pictures $6.20. Earl Ramey — Postage $3.50. Program Chairman, Randolph Schnabel reported the program had already been arranged for the annual dinner meeting in January. Mrs. Gibson presented an invitation to the Sutter County Historical Society to en- tertain the Symposium of Historical Societies of Northern California and Southern Oregon in the fall of 1962.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Gems of California's State Parks
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA – EDMUND G. BROWN JR., GOVERNOR NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY – JOHN LAIRD, SECRETARY CALIFORNIA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION – LISA MANGAT, DIRECTOR JOHN D. PARRISH, Ph.D., STATE GEOLOGIST DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION – DAVID BUNN, DIRECTOR PLATE 1 The rugged cliffs of Del Norte Coast Redwoods State Park are composed of some of California’s Bio-regions the most tortured, twisted, and mobile rocks of the North American continent. The California’s Geomorphic Provinces rocks are mostly buried beneath soils and covered by vigorous redwood forests, which thrive in a climate famous for summer fog and powerful winter storms. The rocks only reveal themselves in steep stream banks, along road and trail cut banks, along the precipitous coastal cliffs and offshore in the form of towering rock monuments or sea stacks. (Photograph by CalTrans staff.) Few of California’s State parks display impressive monoliths adorned like a Patrick’s Point State Park displays a snapshot of geologic processes that have castle with towering spires and few permit rock climbing. Castle Crags State shaped the face of western North America, and that continue today. The rocks Park is an exception. The scenic beauty is best enjoyed from a distant exposed in the seacliffs and offshore represent dynamic interplay between the vantage point where one can see the range of surrounding landforms. The The Klamath Mountains consist of several rugged ranges and deep canyons. Klamath/North Coast Bioregion San Joaquin Valley Colorado Desert subducting oceanic tectonic plate (Gorda Plate) and the continental North American monolith and its surroundings are a microcosm of the Klamath Mountains The mountains reach elevations of 6,000 to 8,000 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Executive Summary
    Sacramento Valley Water Management Agreement Short-term Workplan Executive Summary October 2001 Sacramento Valley Water Management Agreement Short-term Workplan Executive Summary Background implemented and provide benefits by the 2002 and 2003 water years. As an alternative to participating in the This document summarizes the results of the adversarial State Water Resources Control Short-term Workplan effort. As required by Board (SWRCB) Phase 8 Bay–Delta Water the Agreement, this workplan was com- Rights Hearings, California Department of pleted on October 29, 2001. Water Resources (DWR), U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR), Sacramento Valley Process water interests, and export water users entered into the Sacramento Valley Water The Short-term Workplan was prepared by Management Agreement (Agreement) in the Workplan Development Team (WDT), April 2001. This unprecedented Agreement which was formed to provide the technical establishes a process by which the parties are expertise needed to evaluate the projects to collaborating in the development and be included in the workplans. A implementation of a variety of water Management Team (MT) was formed to management projects that will increase the oversee the efforts of the WDT and provide availability of Sacramento Valley water policy-related input. resources. The Agreement provides that increased supplies resulting from the The WDT included water district, agency, projects would be used first to fully meet and consultant staff representing both inbasin needs, but would also be made northern California and south-of-Delta available to help meet the requirements of export interests with expertise in the areas of the 1995 Water Quality Control Plan (WQCP), as well as additional export needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency Strategic Plan April 2018 1.0
    Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency Strategic Plan April 2018 1.0 Introduction The Sutter-Butte Basin (Basin) covers 300 square miles bordered by the Cherokee Canal to the north, the Sutter Buttes to the west, the Sutter Bypass to the southwest and the 44-mile long Feather River to the east—see Figure 1. The Basin is home to 95,000 residents and encompasses $7 billion of damageable assets (as estimated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or USACE). The region has sustained numerous floods, including the 1955 levee failure on the Feather River, which resulted in the deaths of at least 38 people. The personal safety and economic stability of large segments of the population are reliant on flood management systems that, until recent efforts, did not begin to meet modern engineering standards. Numerous projects and programs have been implemented in the Basin over the years to reduce flood risk, including the Feather River West Levee Project, which is nearing completion. The Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency (SBFCA) leads the planning and implementation efforts in the Basin to reduce the risk of catastrophic, riverine flooding. In this role, SBFCA collaborates with local, regional, state, tribal and federal agencies and organizations. On January 13, 2016 the SBFCA Board of Directors adopted the Strategic Plan to guide these efforts. This version is the first update to the Strategic Plan. 2.0 Purpose of the Strategic Plan The purpose of the Strategic Plan is to help formulate and articulate a vision for flood management within the Basin and to describe an approach to achieve this vision.
    [Show full text]
  • Data on California's Extreme Rainfall from 1862- 1995
    Data on California's Extreme Rainfall from 1862- 1995 By Jim Goodridge PO Box 970 Mendocino CA 95460 707 937 4709 June 29,1996 Prepared for: 19% CALIFORNIA WEATHER SYMPOSIUM Theme: "A prehistoric Look at California Rainfall and Floods" Sierra College Science Center, 5000 Rocklin Road, Rocklin, CA 95677 Introduction Prehistoric storms sculpted Earth's landscape and left evidences of their effects every where we look. Prehistoric storms eroded 10,000 feet of the top of the Sutter Buttes and filled the Sacramento Valley on the west side three miles deep with alluvial sediments. Among the condominiums of Incline Village they left boulders that could only have been deposited between houses by debris flows. Debris flows generally have the density of newly mixed concrete and move at about the speed of a freight train. Debris flows are a major force in sculpting Earth's land surface. All rainfalls when they hit the ground pick up minerals and modify the landscape. Significant sever storms can be quite localized and of short duration. They often fall between the measurements from our rain gage network and even now might still qualify as prehistoric. Sometimes we can find the sudden peaks in the stream flow records to tell us of their existence; if we are lucky. This is an account of some of the measured storms within the memories of recent California inhabitants. Some of these storms have remarkably large return periods (Map 1). They are not limited to the windward slopes like winter time orographic storms, (Map 2) they occur randomly distributed geographically as well as by season.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sutter Buttes: Attachments to the Land
    The Sutter Buttes: Attachments to the Land Antonio E. Valdes Humboldt State University Abstract The Sutter Buttes are an isolated group of lava domes jutting out of California’s flat Central Valley. They are a publicly valued icon, and have been compared to natural wonders such as Crater Lake and Yosemite, but unlike those icons, access into the Buttes is currently limited to authorized individuals and private landowners (Martin 1991). In 2003 the California Department of Parks and Recreation (State Parks) purchased 1,785 acres in the northern portion of the Buttes (CapRadio 2007). However, because the property is surrounded entirely by private land, the park is currently not available for public use (Rogers 2013). As a result, State Parks has offered many of the surrounding landowners exorbitant prices for their properties, with the intention of augmenting these properties to the park. By doing so, the state hopes to eventually border a county road, thus making the park accessible to the public. However, as of yet, no landowners have sold their properties to the state. This research investigates landowners’ sense of place, and, more specifically, reveals that a positive sense of place is a strong factor in- fluencing a number of the landowners’ decisions to retain the titles to their properties. The Sutter Buttes’ prominence above the surrounding plains, their near- ly perfect circular arrangement, and their geologic distinctiveness from other mountain ranges makes them anything but normal. Indeed, the physical features of the so-called “smallest mountain range in the world” are unique, but it is the human decisions surrounding these physical features that have allowed the Buttes to retain their character as an undeveloped rangeland.
    [Show full text]
  • Geochemistry of Ground Water in the 1 Sacramento Valley, California
    IQJUN GEOCHEMISTRY OF GROUND WATER IN THE 1 SACRAMENTO VALLEY, CALIFORNIA U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1401-B Geochemistry of Ground Water in the Sacramento Valley, California By LAURENCE C. HULL CENTRAL VALLEY OF CALIFORNIA RASA PROJECT GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1401-B UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1984 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR WILLIAM P. CLARK, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Hull, Laurence C. Geochemistry of ground water in the Sacramento Valley, California (Geological Survey Professional Paper 1401-B) (Central Valley of California RASA Project) Bibliography: 36 p. 1. Water, Underground California Sacramento Valley. 2. Water chemistry. I. Title. II. Series. III. Series: Central Valley of California RASA Project. GB1025.C2H781984 551.4'9'097945 84-600016 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington, D.C. 20402 CONTENTS Page Abstract .................. Bl Temporal changes ............... B13 Introduction ................ 1 Methods of data analysis ........ 15 Geography ............... 1 Dissolved solids .............. 15 Purpose and scope .......... 3 Hydrochemical facies ......... 16 Data compilation ............ 3 1 Nitrate ................... 19 Well-numbering system ........ 3 Hydrochemical facies ......... 20 Acknowledgments ........... 3 Hypothesis testing ............ 21 Description of the study area ...... 3 Processes controlling ground-water chemistry 22 Geology and geomorphology ..... 3 Methods of data analysis ........ 22 Geologic synopsis ......... 4 Principal components analysis .... 22 Geomorphic units ......... 4 Trend surface analysis ........ 22 Hydrogeology ............. 6 Processes and their spatial variation . 22 Hydrochemical facies ........... 7 Mineral stability relations ........... 25 Criteria and procedure for division . 7 Mineralogy of sediments ......... 25 Descriptions of hydrochemical facies Well 12N/01E-34Q .......... 25 Tuscan volcanic rocks .....
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda – Regular Meeting, February 14, 2018, 1 P.M
    Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency Board of Directors Agenda – Regular Meeting, February 14, 2018, 1 p.m. City of Yuba City Council Chambers - 1201 Civic Center Blvd., Yuba City, CA The agenda is posted in the building of the Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency at 1130 Civic Center Blvd. Suite B, Yuba City, and at the Sutter County Library, 750 Forbes Avenue, Yuba City. The agenda summary, backup materials, and approved minutes are also posted on the Sutter Butte Flood Control Agency website at sutterbutteflood.org. Materials related to an item on this agenda and submitted to the Board of Directors after distribution of the agenda packet are available for public inspection in the office of the Board Clerk at 1130 Civic Center Blvd, Suite B, Yuba City, during normal business hours. In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, the meeting room is wheelchair accessible and disabled parking is available. If you have a disability and need, disability related modifications or accommodations to participate in this meeting, please contact the SBFCA office at 530-755-9859 or [email protected]. Requests must be made one full business day before the start of the meeting. County of Sutter County of Butte City of Yuba City City of Live Oak Mat Conant Bill Connelly John Buckland Jason Banks Larry Munger Steve Lambert Stan Cleveland Alt. Lakhvir Ghag Alt. Ron Sullenger Alt. Manny Cardoza Alt. Jim Whiteaker Alt. Shon Harris City of Gridley City of Biggs Levee District 1 Levee District 9 Frank Hall Bo Sheppard Francis Silva Mike Morris Alt. Gary Davidson Alt.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Mammal Species of Special Concern in California, Bolster, BC, Ed., 1998
    Terrestrial Mammal Species of Special Concern in California, Bolster, B.C., Ed., 1998 147 Watch List Accounts Salinas ornate shrew, Sorex ornatus salaries Paul W. Collins Museum records of S. o. salarius extend from the vicinity of the mouth of the Pajaro River (Watsonville Slough), Santa Cruz County (Rudd 1948), south along the immediate coast to Carmel (Von Bloeker 1939). This subspecies was originally described as inhabiting coastal salt-marshes and adjacent sandhill areas in the vicinity of Monterey and Carmel bays, Monterey County (Von Bloeker 1938, 1939). According to Williams (1986), it occupies riparian, wetland and upland terrestrial communities in the vicinity of the Salinas River Delta. The capture of 61 ornate shrews near the Salinas River mouth in July 1990 with 700 trap-nights of effort suggests that S. o. salarius may still be common in the area (J. Maldonado pers. comm.). More recent data than these on the distribution and status of this subspecies were not available during the preparation of this document. Although the Salinas ornate shrew has a restricted distribution in a region under pressure from urban and agricultural developments, it occupies a diversity of habitats, and much of the remaining coastal salt marshes within its geographic range are protected from development. Recent surveys indicate it is still common. Rudd (1948) and Junge and Hoffmann (1981) questioned the currently accepted taxonomy of ornate shrews from the vicinity of Monterey Bay. A more extensive range-wide genetic and morphologic evaluation of ornate shrews is currently under way (Maldonado pers. comm.). Results of that study should help to clarify whether ornate shrews from the vicinity of Monterey Bay warrant subspecific recognition.
    [Show full text]
  • David Wyatt • Bats of the Sutter Buttes What Is the Only Mammal That Flies? Yes, You Got It
    Volume 54, Number 6 March 2009 David Wyatt • Bats of the Sutter Buttes What is the only mammal that flies? Yes, you got it . they are our bats. Bats are also one of our most misunderstood creatures with many myths and misconceptions sur- rounding them. Whether you love them, hate them, or are simply indifferent to them, join us in discovering the fascinating, some- times bizarre, world of bats. On March 5, The Dusky Warbler, biologist David Wyatt will introduce us to found by Emilie many of the bat species we can find here in Strauss on October 9 California and beyond. Learn that most bats at Point Isabel, was, eat insects and are extremely important in by far, the best bird controlling insect pest numbers. Also dis- on Denise’s 2008 cover how bat biologists study these mam- Contra Costa Big mals and what that information is revealing Year list. about their behavior and life histories. Photo by Bob Lewis Dave Wyatt is currently co-chair of the Biology Department of Sacramento City College. He has taught in community colleges since 993 and has been full time at SCC since 998 teaching various courses in Field Ecology. His primary research interests have revolved around three areas: Ringtails, bats, Sutter Buttes, the world’s smallest mountain range, were known by the Maidu as Esto and insects (primarily beetles, since 987). Yamani–The Middle Mountains–and were regarded as a place for spiritual renewal . His research has been predominantly in Dave is a parent and is currently owned by up close and personal and found it a great California, but has extended to Baja Califor- four beagles that fill his life with howls of pleasure to see Dave with his students.
    [Show full text]
  • Park Lands, Historic Sites, Wildlife and Forest Conservation. Bonds
    University of California, Hastings College of the Law UC Hastings Scholarship Repository Initiatives California Ballot Propositions and Initiatives 6-7-1993 Park Lands, Historic Sites, Wildlife And Forest Conservation. Bonds. Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.uchastings.edu/ca_ballot_inits Recommended Citation Park Lands, Historic Sites, Wildlife And Forest Conservation. Bonds. California Initiative 593 (1993). http://repository.uchastings.edu/ca_ballot_inits/756 This Initiative is brought to you for free and open access by the California Ballot Propositions and Initiatives at UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Initiatives by an authorized administrator of UC Hastings Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE December 9, 1993 TO: All County Clerks/Registrars of Voters (93155) Pursuant to Section 3523 of the Elections Code, I hereby certify that on December 9, 1993 the certificates received from the County Clerks or Registrars of Voters by the Secretary of State established that the Initiative Statute, PARK LANDS, HISTORIC SITES, WILDLIFE AND FOREST CONSERVATION. BONDS has been signed by the requisite number of qualified electors needed to declare the petition sufficient. The PARK LANDS, HISTORIC SITES, WILDLIFE AND FOREST CONSERVATION. BONDS. INITIATIVE STATUTE is, therefore, qualified for the June 7, 1994 Primary Election. PARK LANDS, HISTORIC SITES, WILDLIFE AND FOREST CONSERVA­ TION. BONDS. INITIATIVE STATUTE. Authorizes general obligation bonds of almost $2 billion, to be repaid from the General Fund, for acquisition, development, rehabilitation, restoration and conservation of park lands, historic sites, wildlife areas and forest throughout California. Includes funds for parks and recreational facilities throughout the State.
    [Show full text]
  • 1744 RFQ Consulting Services Agreement- Far Western.Pdf
    Tuolumne County Department of Public Works Engineering Division STANDARD AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES This Agreement (“Agreement”) is made and entered into this ____ day of __________, 2020 by and between the County of Tuolumne (“County”) and Far Western Anthropological Research Group, Inc., a California Corporation(“Consultant”) pursuant to the following terms and conditions. ARTICLE I STATEMENT OF WORK A. The work to be performed under this Agreement is described in this Article and the Consultant’s approved Category 5, Cultural Resources Scope of Work and Cost Proposal dated May 29, 2020 (“Project”). The Consultant’s approved Scope of Work is attached hereto as Attachment A and incorporated herein by reference. The Consultant’s approved Cost Proposal is attached hereto as Attachment B and incorporated herein by reference. If there is any conflict between the approved Scope of Work and Cost Proposal and this Agreement, the provisions of this Agreement shall control. B. Consultant shall submit progress reports at least once a month. The report should be sufficiently detailed for County’s Project Manager to determine if Consultant is performing to expectations, or is on schedule, to provide communication of interim findings, and to sufficiently address any difficulties or special problems encountered, so remedies can be developed. C. Subsurface Investigations County recognizes that subsurface conditions may vary from those encountered at the location where borings, surveys or explorations are made by Consultant and that the data, interpretations and recommendations by Consultant are based solely on the information available to Consultant. Consultant will be responsible for the data, interpretations and recommendations, but will not be responsible for the interpretation by others of the information developed.
    [Show full text]