DOCSLIB.ORG

Sixty-Eight Spp. Paper Adding 25 Briefly In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sixty-Eight Spp. Paper Adding 25 Briefly In Odonata from the Yucatan peninsula, Mexico Dennis+R. Paulson Washington State Museum DB-10, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, United States Abstract —- Sixty-eight spp. of Odon. are at based on collections that were extensive but present known from the Yucatan Peninsula, the nevertheless made by nonspecialists. Thirty-five from and present paper adding 25 spp. and mahy .new species were reported Campeche localities the record. Protoneura Yucatan in that and to published paper, essentially nothing corculum, Argia gaumeri, Anax concolor, A. has been published about the region subse- junius, Coryphaeschna new. sp. Macrodiplax quently. balteata, Micrathyria hageni, Perithemis inten- GLOYD (1938), CALVERT (1956) and sa, P. mooma, Tramea binotata and T. lacerata LEONARD (1977) renamed Belonia crocei- discussed in Aeshna are greater detail. pennis, cornigera and Acanthagrion gracile of earlier publications asLibellula gaigei, Introduction Aeshna psilus and Acanthagrion quadratum Details on the distribution of Odonata in respectively. BORROR (1942), DONNELLY & Mexico remain much as they were when the ALAYO (1966), PAULSON & GARRISON Biologia Centrali-Americana was published (1977) and DE MARMELS & RACENIS (CALVERT, 1901-1908). The entire Yucatan (1982) each added another species to the list of Yucatan and Peninsula (Campeche. Quintana those known to occur on the peninsula. remained terra I visited this in Roo) incognita odonalologica region twice, oncevery briefly until of and the publication WILLIAMSON'S July 1965 again for a longer period in (1936) paper on the dragonflies of the region. November 1983. I collected 219 specimens of 45 34 No. 1984 Notul. odonatol., Vol. 2, 3, pp. 33-52, June 1, species, and, in addition, I observed 11 species roadside 6.3. mi. SW Sabancuy, 5 July 1965; - 1 did that not collect but am confident of their (3) CAMPECHE, rain ponds 24.7 mi. NE identification. Sabancuy, 9 July 1965; — (4) CAMPECHE, E rain pond 11.3 mi. Castamay, 8 July 1965; — Localities (5) CAMPECHE, rain ponds 0.7 mi. E Ichek, 8 These numbered with the — are to correspond July 1965; (6) YUCATAN, estuary and listed Table I. The numbers after each species in ponds at Celesttin, 6 November 1983; — (7) localities listed the the are from base to tip of YUCATAN, ponds and forest edge at Uxmal, the peninsula. 7, 15 & 16 November 1983; — (8) YUCATAN, Pedro San N (I) CAMPECHE, Rio San at aguada 8.8 mi. Muna, 8 July 1965; — (9) 9 — Pedro, July 1965; (2) CAMPECHE, YUCATAN, M6rida, 8 July 1965; — (10) Table I — List of the Odonata recorded from the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico Stales Years „ States Years c _ SpeciesSpec,es ReCOrdSRecords C Y QR 65 83 Lestidae • Lestes 7 forficulaforfícula xxX X XxxX 3, 4, 5, 7 L. L. lenualustenuatus xxX X Xx L, 8 **L **L. tikalustikalus xX xX 7 Protoneuridae Neoneura amelia xX L ProtoneuraProloneura corculum Xx Xx xX L,L, 8, 1111 Coenagrionidae ••*• AcanthagrionAcanlhagrioninexpectuminexpedum xxX X XxxX 5, 7,8 A. A. quadratumquadratum Xx L Anomalagrion hastatumhastalum Xx L Argia gaumeri xxX X xxX X L,L, 7, 8 A. A. translatatransíala Xx LL *• minutum Argiallagma minulum xxX X xxX X 5, 7, 8 EnacanthaEnacanlha caribbea xxX X xX xX L,L, 5,5,77 *hchnura*Ischnura capreola xX xX 5 I.1. ramburi 8 tamburi XxxX xxX X L, 3, 4, 5, 6S, 7, 8 Leptobasis vacillansvacilians xX LL •* •* cultellatum 8 Neoerythrommacullellalum Xx xX Xx 3, 8 Telebasis collopistescollopistes xX L T. filiolafilióla xxX X xxX X L T. salva xxX X xxX X L, 5S, 7, 8 Aeshnidae L Aeshna psilus xX L *Anax amaziliamazili Xx xX 5 *A.*/4. concolorconcolor xX Xx 7 • *A.A. junius xxX X xX 6S,6S, 7, IOS,I0S, I2SI2S •* Coryphaeschna adnexa xX xX 8S *C. viriditasviridii as xX xX xX 7,7, I2S, I3S •• 7S Coryphaeschna sp. n. xX xX • mexicana 7 GynacanthaGynacanlha xX xX 7 *G. 7 *G. nervosanen'osa xxX X xxX X 2, 6S, 7 * *TriacanthagynaTriacanthagyna caribbea Xx Xx 2 • T. septimaséptima Xx xX 2 "Notul. No. odonatol., Vol. 2, 3, pp. 33-52, June I, 1984 35 Table I —(continued) Stales Years „ Years • SpeCICSSpecies ReCOrdsRecords CC Y QR 65 83 Libellulidae * *Anal normalis 7 Anatyaya normalis XxxX 7 Brachymesiafurcata xxX X Xx L, 3S, 8 B. herbida xxX X xxX X L, 3S, 7, 8 Cannaphila insularis xX xX L, 8 DythemisDylhemis sterilissrerilis xxX X xX L, 9 *Erythemis attalaaliala xX xX 7S E. E. haematogastrahaemalogaslra xX L E. E. mithroides xxX X xX L, 7S E. E. plebejapleheja xxX X xX L, 3,3,5,5, 8 E. simplicicollis xxX X Xx L, 3S, 8 E. vesiculosavesiculosa xxxX X X XxxX L, 3, 5S, 6S, 7S, 8, IOS, I2S,12S, I3SI3S bereniceBerenice ErylhrodiplaxErythrodiplax xxxX X X XxxX L, 3,6S,3, 6S, IOS, I3S E. E. fervida xxX X XxxX L, 7S, 8S, IOS E. E. fusca xxX X Xx L, 5,5,88 E. umbrata E. umbrala xxxX X X xxX X L, 3S.3S, 5, 6S, IIS,IIS, 12, I3SI3S cubensis *Idiataphe*ldialaphe XxxX xX 3S, 8S LibellulaLibellula L gaigei xX L L. L. herculeahercúlea xX L Macrodiplax balteataballeala xX xx X X L, 6S, 8S, IOS10S cella *Miathyria mar xX xX 7S Micrathyriaaequalis xxX X Xx L, 3 M. M. debilis xxX X Xx L, 3,83, 8 M. M. didyma xxX X xX L, 8 M. hageni xxX X xxX X L, 3,5,73, 5, 7 OrthemisOnhemis ferruginea ferruginea xxxX X X xxX X L, 3S, 5, 6S, 7, 8, IIS, 13S O. levis xX Xx L, 8S PantalaPanlala ßavescensflavescens xxxX X X X xxX L, 2, 4S, 5S, 6S, 7S, 8S,8S, IOS,IOS, I1 IS, I2S, I3S *P. hymenaea xxX X xxX X 2,4S,2, 4S, 5,6S5, 6S PerithemisPerilhemis domitiadomilia xxX X xxX X L, 7, 8, I3S13S P. intensa P. xX L P. P. mooma xxX X xxX X L, 7, 8 Planiplax xx sanguinivetrissanguinivenlris X X Xx L, 8 *TholymisTholymis citrina xX citrina Xx xxX X 2, I3SI3S Tramea abdominalis 7 xxX X xxX X L.L, 5, 7 *T.*T binotatabinatala xX xX I3S T. calvenicalverti xxxX X X XxxX L, 1,3,I, 3, 5S,5S, 6, 7, 8,8, IOS, I2S • *T.T. lateratalacerala xxX X xX 6S,6S, I3S *T. onusta xxX X xX 6S.6S, 7, IOS, 12S, I3S States: = = C = Campeche, Y Yucatan, — QR Quintana Roo, Years: 65 = July 1965, 83 = No- vember 1983. — Records: L = literature, numbers as indicated = in text; S sight record only. — * = •• first record for Yucatan Peninsula. — = first specified locality for Mexico. 36 Notul. odonatol., Vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 33-52, June 1, 1984 YUCATAN, coastal scrub and mangroves east were not exhaustive, 1 did look for Odonata at of — Chicxulub, 14 November 1983; (II) ponds and ditches representative of all the YUCATAN, cenote and rain habitats the puddles at aquatic seen on island, and I was 5 November — Chichen-ltzi, 1983; (12) surprised at the relatively low diversity of QUINTANA ROO, rain puddles and forest species there, in particular the lack of edge at Canctin airport, 17 November 1983; — Zygoptera. In addition to the species recorded Table (13) QUINTANA ROO, Isla Cozumel, 3 in 1, I saw an unidentified Anax and November 1983. members of the group of red species of Tramea with narrow wing markings (abdominalis, List of species calverti and insularis); thus at least 13 species Table I lists all the species presently known to occur occur on island, and future visits will on the Yucatan Peninsula, with records from doubtless add others. each of the three indicated. states They total 68 The following species merit additional species, of which 25 (37%) are first recorded comment. from the herein. Five of them are first Protoneura peninsula corculum and Argia gaumeri — recorded from in Mexico, Unlike other oftheir in a specified locality members genera Middle all were listed PAULSON these and thus although by (1982) America, are pond species are with localities 8 no specified. The occurrence of adapted for distribution on the streamless species ofAnisoptera is based solely on my sight Yucatan Peninsula, Even more interesting is the records, but all they are species that are readily apparent abundance of Argia translata at identifiable in the field and with which I have Xtoloc Cenote, Chichen-It/a (WILLIAMSON, had considerable experience. Sight records of as this is in 1936), species always on streams my Odonata should be as readily acceptable (and as experience. critically as those of at least for Anax and judged) birds, concolor Micrathyria hageni — These many species. two species were abundant at forest ponds at Uxmal, and I was surprised to see both Discussion species on territory and mating at 17:20 hours Both visits were during the the rainy season, after sun had disappeared behind the forest the although 1983 one took place during an and light levels were so low that it was difficult unusual prolongation of that season, perhaps to see them very well. I thought at first the Anax another of the effects of far-reaching ”E 1 Nino" were Gynacantha until I saw them more clearly, of that I travelled lush I other Anax year. Everywhere was and have never seen any on and grean, many dragonflies were on territory territory so late in the day. MAY (1980) found and of of the and mating, young individuals some hagenito be one species of Micrathyria species indicated continued In most that and low emergence. began flying early at relatively it would be drier in I nevertheless years November, and temperatures, but was amazed to Odonata be activity might more reduced by that see what I considered a normally heliophilic time in a normal year.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Checklist of North American Odonata
    A Checklist of North American Odonata Including English Name, Etymology, Type Locality, and Distribution Dennis R. Paulson and Sidney W. Dunkle 2009 Edition (updated 14 April 2009) A Checklist of North American Odonata Including English Name, Etymology, Type Locality, and Distribution 2009 Edition (updated 14 April 2009) Dennis R. Paulson1 and Sidney W. Dunkle2 Originally published as Occasional Paper No. 56, Slater Museum of Natural History, University of Puget Sound, June 1999; completely revised March 2009. Copyright © 2009 Dennis R. Paulson and Sidney W. Dunkle 2009 edition published by Jim Johnson Cover photo: Tramea carolina (Carolina Saddlebags), Cabin Lake, Aiken Co., South Carolina, 13 May 2008, Dennis Paulson. 1 1724 NE 98 Street, Seattle, WA 98115 2 8030 Lakeside Parkway, Apt. 8208, Tucson, AZ 85730 ABSTRACT The checklist includes all 457 species of North American Odonata considered valid at this time. For each species the original citation, English name, type locality, etymology of both scientific and English names, and approxi- mate distribution are given. Literature citations for original descriptions of all species are given in the appended list of references. INTRODUCTION Before the first edition of this checklist there was no re- Table 1. The families of North American Odonata, cent checklist of North American Odonata. Muttkows- with number of species. ki (1910) and Needham and Heywood (1929) are long out of date. The Zygoptera and Anisoptera were cov- Family Genera Species ered by Westfall and May (2006) and Needham, West- fall, and May (2000), respectively, but some changes Calopterygidae 2 8 in nomenclature have been made subsequently. Davies Lestidae 2 19 and Tobin (1984, 1985) listed the world odonate fauna Coenagrionidae 15 103 but did not include type localities or details of distri- Platystictidae 1 1 bution.
    [Show full text]
  • Neoneura, Species, Neoneura Jurzitzai
    Odonatologica 28(4): 343-375 December I, 1999 The genus Neoneura, with keys and description of a new species, Neoneurajurzitzai spec. nov. (Zygoptera: Protoneuridae) R.W. Garrison Research Associate, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, 900 Exposition Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90007, United States Received April 10, 1999 / Reviewed and Accepted May 11, 1999 A all both synopsis of 23 spp. includes keys to sexes, based primarily on caudal appendage morphology in males and morphology of the hind lobe of the prothorax in females, diagnoses, distributional notes and diagnostic illustrations. N. jurzitzai sp.n. (holotype 6: Brazil, Santa Catarina state, Nova Teutonia, 5 XI-I942, in UMMZ) is described, and the 6 and 9 ofN. rufithorax Selys are described based on specimens from Peru. INTRODUCTION include The genus Neoneura was first proposed by SELYS (1860) to two new species, N. rubriventris and N. bilinearis. Later, SELYS (1886) expanded the ge- nus to include eight species, of which four were new. CALVERT (1903, 1907) described three species (N. aaroni, N. amelia, and N. paya) from southern Texas, Mexico, and Central America. WILLIAMSON (1917), in his seminal revision monographed all known species, described six new species, and included diagnos- tic illustrationsof all known species. It is the only paper which attempted to key all work is valuable for Williamson’s species. Besides the illustrations, the attempt to determine the identity of some of the poorly known Selysian species. Although Williamsonkeyed the males for all species, he did not have material ofN. rufilhorax Selys or N. waltheri Selys. At about the same time, KENNEDY (1917) illustrated the penes of all known species.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of North American Odonata, 2021 1 Each Species Entry in the Checklist Is a Paragraph In- Table 2
    A Checklist of North American Odonata Including English Name, Etymology, Type Locality, and Distribution Dennis R. Paulson and Sidney W. Dunkle 2021 Edition (updated 12 February 2021) A Checklist of North American Odonata Including English Name, Etymology, Type Locality, and Distribution 2021 Edition (updated 12 February 2021) Dennis R. Paulson1 and Sidney W. Dunkle2 Originally published as Occasional Paper No. 56, Slater Museum of Natural History, University of Puget Sound, June 1999; completely revised March 2009; updated February 2011, February 2012, October 2016, November 2018, and February 2021. Copyright © 2021 Dennis R. Paulson and Sidney W. Dunkle 2009, 2011, 2012, 2016, 2018, and 2021 editions published by Jim Johnson Cover photo: Male Calopteryx aequabilis, River Jewelwing, from Crab Creek, Grant County, Washington, 27 May 2020. Photo by Netta Smith. 1 1724 NE 98th Street, Seattle, WA 98115 2 8030 Lakeside Parkway, Apt. 8208, Tucson, AZ 85730 ABSTRACT The checklist includes all 471 species of North American Odonata (Canada and the continental United States) considered valid at this time. For each species the original citation, English name, type locality, etymology of both scientific and English names, and approximate distribution are given. Literature citations for original descriptions of all species are given in the appended list of references. INTRODUCTION We publish this as the most comprehensive checklist Table 1. The families of North American Odonata, of all of the North American Odonata. Muttkowski with number of species. (1910) and Needham and Heywood (1929) are long out of date. The Anisoptera and Zygoptera were cov- Family Genera Species ered by Needham, Westfall, and May (2014) and West- fall and May (2006), respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas
    Terrestrial Arthropod Surveys on Pagan Island, Northern Marianas Neal L. Evenhuis, Lucius G. Eldredge, Keith T. Arakaki, Darcy Oishi, Janis N. Garcia & William P. Haines Pacific Biological Survey, Bishop Museum, Honolulu, Hawaii 96817 Final Report November 2010 Prepared for: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific Islands Fish & Wildlife Office Honolulu, Hawaii Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 2 BISHOP MUSEUM The State Museum of Natural and Cultural History 1525 Bernice Street Honolulu, Hawai’i 96817–2704, USA Copyright© 2010 Bishop Museum All Rights Reserved Printed in the United States of America Contribution No. 2010-015 to the Pacific Biological Survey Evenhuis et al. — Pagan Island Arthropod Survey 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ......................................................................................................... 5 Background ..................................................................................................................... 7 General History .............................................................................................................. 10 Previous Expeditions to Pagan Surveying Terrestrial Arthropods ................................ 12 Current Survey and List of Collecting Sites .................................................................. 18 Sampling Methods ......................................................................................................... 25 Survey Results ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Identification Guide to the Australian Odonata Australian the to Guide Identification
    Identification Guide to theAustralian Odonata www.environment.nsw.gov.au Identification Guide to the Australian Odonata Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW Identification Guide to the Australian Odonata Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication data Theischinger, G. (Gunther), 1940– Identification Guide to the Australian Odonata 1. Odonata – Australia. 2. Odonata – Australia – Identification. I. Endersby I. (Ian), 1941- . II. Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW © 2009 Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW Front cover: Petalura gigantea, male (photo R. Tuft) Prepared by: Gunther Theischinger, Waters and Catchments Science, Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW and Ian Endersby, 56 Looker Road, Montmorency, Victoria 3094 Published by: Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW 59–61 Goulburn Street Sydney PO Box A290 Sydney South 1232 Phone: (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Phone: 131555 (information & publication requests) Fax: (02) 9995 5999 Email: [email protected] Website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au The Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW is pleased to allow this material to be reproduced in whole or in part, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. ISBN 978 1 74232 475 3 DECCW 2009/730 December 2009 Printed using environmentally sustainable paper. Contents About this guide iv 1 Introduction 1 2 Systematics
    [Show full text]
  • Cumulative Index of ARGIA and Bulletin of American Odonatology
    Cumulative Index of ARGIA and Bulletin of American Odonatology Compiled by Jim Johnson PDF available at http://odonata.bogfoot.net/docs/Argia-BAO_Cumulative_Index.pdf Last updated: 14 February 2021 Below are titles from all issues of ARGIA and Bulletin of American Odonatology (BAO) published to date by the Dragonfly Society of the Americas. The purpose of this listing is to facilitate the searching of authors and title keywords across all issues in both journals, and to make browsing of the titles more convenient. PDFs of ARGIA and BAO can be downloaded from https://www.dragonflysocietyamericas.org/en/publications. The most recent three years of issues for both publications are only available to current members of the Dragonfly Society of the Americas. Contact Jim Johnson at [email protected] if you find any errors. ARGIA 1 (1–4), 1989 Welcome to the Dragonfly Society of America Cook, C. 1 Society's Name Revised Cook, C. 2 DSA Receives Grant from SIO Cook, C. 2 North and Central American Catalogue of Odonata—A Proposal Donnelly, T.W. 3 US Endangered Species—A Request for Information Donnelly, T.W. 4 Odonate Collecting in the Peruvian Amazon Dunkle, S.W. 5 Collecting in Costa Rica Dunkle, S.W. 6 Research in Progress Garrison, R.W. 8 Season Summary Project Cook, C. 9 Membership List 10 Survey of Ohio Odonata Planned Glotzhober, R.C. 11 Book Review: The Dragonflies of Europe Cook, C. 12 Book Review: Dragonflies of the Florida Peninsula, Bermuda and the Bahamas Cook, C. 12 Constitution of the Dragonfly Society of America 13 Exchanges and Notices 15 General Information About the Dragonfly Society of America (DSA) Cook, C.
    [Show full text]
  • Microsoft Outlook
    Joey Steil From: Leslie Jordan <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 25, 2018 1:13 PM To: Angela Ruberto Subject: Potential Environmental Beneficial Users of Surface Water in Your GSA Attachments: Paso Basin - County of San Luis Obispo Groundwater Sustainabilit_detail.xls; Field_Descriptions.xlsx; Freshwater_Species_Data_Sources.xls; FW_Paper_PLOSONE.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S1.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S2.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S3.pdf; FW_Paper_PLOSONE_S4.pdf CALIFORNIA WATER | GROUNDWATER To: GSAs We write to provide a starting point for addressing environmental beneficial users of surface water, as required under the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (SGMA). SGMA seeks to achieve sustainability, which is defined as the absence of several undesirable results, including “depletions of interconnected surface water that have significant and unreasonable adverse impacts on beneficial users of surface water” (Water Code §10721). The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a science-based, nonprofit organization with a mission to conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends. Like humans, plants and animals often rely on groundwater for survival, which is why TNC helped develop, and is now helping to implement, SGMA. Earlier this year, we launched the Groundwater Resource Hub, which is an online resource intended to help make it easier and cheaper to address environmental requirements under SGMA. As a first step in addressing when depletions might have an adverse impact, The Nature Conservancy recommends identifying the beneficial users of surface water, which include environmental users. This is a critical step, as it is impossible to define “significant and unreasonable adverse impacts” without knowing what is being impacted. To make this easy, we are providing this letter and the accompanying documents as the best available science on the freshwater species within the boundary of your groundwater sustainability agency (GSA).
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of the Higher Libelluloidea (Anisoptera: Odonata): an Exploration of the Most Speciose Superfamily of Dragonflies
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 45 (2007) 289–310 www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Phylogeny of the higher Libelluloidea (Anisoptera: Odonata): An exploration of the most speciose superfamily of dragonflies Jessica Ware a,*, Michael May a, Karl Kjer b a Department of Entomology, Rutgers University, 93 Lipman Drive, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA b Department of Ecology, Evolution and Natural Resources, Rutgers University, 14 College Farm Road, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA Received 8 December 2006; revised 8 May 2007; accepted 21 May 2007 Available online 4 July 2007 Abstract Although libelluloid dragonflies are diverse, numerous, and commonly observed and studied, their phylogenetic history is uncertain. Over 150 years of taxonomic study of Libelluloidea Rambur, 1842, beginning with Hagen (1840), [Rambur, M.P., 1842. Neuropteres. Histoire naturelle des Insectes, Paris, pp. 534; Hagen, H., 1840. Synonymia Libellularum Europaearum. Dissertation inaugularis quam consensu et auctoritate gratiosi medicorum ordinis in academia albertina ad summos in medicina et chirurgia honores.] and Selys (1850), [de Selys Longchamps, E., 1850. Revue des Odonates ou Libellules d’Europe [avec la collaboration de H.A. Hagen]. Muquardt, Brux- elles; Leipzig, 1–408.], has failed to produce a consensus about family and subfamily relationships. The present study provides a well- substantiated phylogeny of the Libelluloidea generated from gene fragments of two independent genes, the 16S and 28S ribosomal RNA (rRNA), and using models that take into account non-independence of correlated rRNA sites. Ninety-three ingroup taxa and six outgroup taxa were amplified for the 28S fragment; 78 ingroup taxa and five outgroup taxa were amplified for the 16S fragment.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of Dragonfly (Odonata: Anisoptera) Diversity in the Campus
    Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2016; 4(3): 124-127 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 JEZS 2016; 4(3): 124-127 A checklist of dragonfly (Odonata: Anisoptera) © 2016 JEZS diversity in the campus of University Of Science Received: 12-03-2016 Accepted: 13-04-2016 And Technology, Meghalaya (USTM), Ri Bhoi Biswajit Kumar Acharjee district, Meghalaya, India Department of Zoology, University of Science and Technology (USTM), Techno City, Kiling Road, Baridua, 9th Mile, Ri-Bhoi, Biswajit Kumar Acharjee, Linda Karzee Meghalaya-793101. Linda Karzee Abstract 4th semester student, Department Northeastern India has been marked by its unique species richness and diversity. Like lepidopteron of Zoology, University of Science diversity, distribution and diversity of odonata in this region has been well studied. However no concrete and Technology (USTM), Techno study has been done in Ri-Bhoi district of Meghalaya where the university campus is situated. USTM, a City, Kiling Road, Baridua, 9th nascent university, is built up in a nice landscape documented by marshy areas and hill sides with good Mile, Ri-Bhoi, Meghalaya-793101. vegetation that harbors good dragonfly diversity. In the present study, a survey has been carried out to ascertain dragonfly diversity and 36 species of dragonflies were recorded. This study is first of its kind and has taxonomic importance as it adds few more species to the list of dragonflies from Ri-Bhoi District of Meghalaya. Keywords: Dragonflies, Diversity, USTM, Ri-Bhoi, Meghalaya 1. Introduction Dragonflies, belonging to the order Odonata: sub order Anisoptera, are robust flying insects that are marked by flexible head, slender abdomen, sub equal wings with distinct venations, large compound eyes and attractive body coloration.
    [Show full text]
  • Including a Third Species of Ischnura Damselfly
    Errata and Addenda: Updated Illustrated Checklist of Dragonflies of the UAE – including a third species of Ischnura damselfly by Robert W. Reimer, Gary R. Feulner and Richard J. Hornby Our paper titled “An Updated Illustrated Checklist of Errata Dragonflies of the UAE” (Feulner et al. 2007), published in Tribulus Vol. 17, stimulated valuable comment and Among the photographs which illustrated the inquiry as well as further investigations by the authors checklist, we made the decision to include images of a themselves. These confirmed errors in the identifications number of atypical forms seen over the years, which attributed to several photographs, which are corrected were not always readily identifiable. Subsequent below. comment by international experts has confirmed the In addition, continuing research and field studies by value of that decision from a heuristic standpoint, but also Reimer have revealed the presence of a third species of emphasises that we should have been more circumspect Ischnura damselfly, as well as the possible presence of in assigning even tentative identifications. a further dragonfly species observed in the coastal Three of our photographs, all of immature individuals, environment in neighbouring Oman. These have now been more authoritatively identified and a note developments are reported below, along with certain is made here of the corrections. K-D.B. Dijkstra, additional information likely to be of interest to those Wolfgang Schneider and Laurent Juillerat have all written studying the Odonata of the UAE and northern Oman, to indicate their views as follows (all Figures referenced including tips for field discrimination between Ischnura are reproduced here): damselfly species.
    [Show full text]
  • Prioritizing Odonata for Conservation Action in the Northeastern USA
    APPLIED ODONATOLOGY Prioritizing Odonata for conservation action in the northeastern USA Erin L. White1,4, Pamela D. Hunt2,5, Matthew D. Schlesinger1,6, Jeffrey D. Corser1,7, and Phillip G. deMaynadier3,8 1New York Natural Heritage Program, State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry, 625 Broadway 5th Floor, Albany, New York 12233-4757 USA 2Audubon Society of New Hampshire, 84 Silk Farm Road, Concord, New Hampshire 03301 USA 3Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, 650 State Street, Bangor, Maine 04401 USA Abstract: Odonata are valuable biological indicators of freshwater ecosystem integrity and climate change, and the northeastern USA (Virginia to Maine) is a hotspot of odonate diversity and a region of historical and grow- ing threats to freshwater ecosystems. This duality highlights the urgency of developing a comprehensive conser- vation assessment of the region’s 228 resident odonate species. We offer a prioritization framework modified from NatureServe’s method for assessing conservation status ranks by assigning a single regional vulnerability metric (R-rank) reflecting each species’ degree of relative extinction risk in the northeastern USA. We calculated the R-rank based on 3 rarity factors (range extent, area of occupancy, and habitat specificity), 1 threat factor (vulnerability of occupied habitats), and 1 trend factor (relative change in range size). We combine this R-rank with the degree of endemicity (% of the species’ USA and Canadian range that falls within the region) as a proxy for regional responsibility, thereby deriving a list of species of combined vulnerability and regional management responsibility. Overall, 18% of the region’s odonate fauna is imperiled (R1 and R2), and peatlands, low-gradient streams and seeps, high-gradient headwaters, and larger rivers that harbor a disproportionate number of these species should be considered as priority habitat types for conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Focusing on the Landscape a Report for Caring for Our Country
    Focusing on the Landscape Biodiversity in Australia’s National Reserve System Part A: Fauna A Report for Caring for Our Country Prepared by Industry and Investment, New South Wales Forest Science Centre, Forest & Rangeland Ecosystems. PO Box 100, Beecroft NSW 2119 Australia. 1 Table of Contents Figures.......................................................................................................................................2 Tables........................................................................................................................................2 Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................5 Introduction...............................................................................................................................8 Methods.....................................................................................................................................9 Results and Discussion ...........................................................................................................14 References.............................................................................................................................194 Appendix 1 Vertebrate summary .........................................................................................196 Appendix 2 Invertebrate summary.......................................................................................197 Figures Figure 1. Location of protected areas
    [Show full text]