Mauritanie République Islamique PROFILE
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Factiva RTF Display Format
Mauritanians Doubt Existence of CIA Prisons in Their Country 525 words 9 July 2007 Voice of America Press Releases and Documents English CY Copyright (c) 2007 Federal Information & News Dispatch, Inc. VOA English Service DATELINE: Dakar Many Mauritanians says they do not believe claims made by an American journalist, and denied by their government, that the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency maintains secret interrogation cells in their country. Many also say they do not support military cooperation with the United States. Naomi Schwarz has more from VOA's West Africa bureau in Dakar. The affair began with a tiny mention in a long article in an American magazine, The New Yorker. The author says a senior intelligence official, unnamed, told him the United States had opened a new detainee center in Mauritania in late 2005 to house and interrogate terrorism suspects. The claim has been reprinted in Mauritanian media. It has caused a huge reaction there. Local journalist Salem Bokari says some people believe the claims, but the vast majority is extremely skeptical. But he says people want a government investigation to find out whether or not they are true. On Friday, before the National Assembly, Mauritania's justice minister formally denied the existence of any secret U.S. prisons in the country. The government has said its relationship with the U.S. military is limited to training and information sharing. Bokari says most Mauritanians hope the relationship stays minimal. Page 1 © 2007 Factiva, Inc. All rights reserved. He says Mauritanians do not support the government of President George Bush, because they feel he has not done much for the third world and for Muslims around the world. -
The Executive Survey General Information and Guidelines
The Executive Survey General Information and Guidelines Dear Country Expert, In this section, we distinguish between the head of state (HOS) and the head of government (HOG). • The Head of State (HOS) is an individual or collective body that serves as the chief public representative of the country; his or her function could be purely ceremonial. • The Head of Government (HOG) is the chief officer(s) of the executive branch of government; the HOG may also be HOS, in which case the executive survey only pertains to the HOS. • The executive survey applies to the person who effectively holds these positions in practice. • The HOS/HOG pair will always include the effective ruler of the country, even if for a period this is the commander of foreign occupying forces. • The HOS and/or HOG must rule over a significant part of the country’s territory. • The HOS and/or HOG must be a resident of the country — governments in exile are not listed. • By implication, if you are considering a semi-sovereign territory, such as a colony or an annexed territory, the HOS and/or HOG will be a person located in the territory in question, not in the capital of the colonizing/annexing country. • Only HOSs and/or HOGs who stay in power for 100 consecutive days or more will be included in the surveys. • A country may go without a HOG but there will be no period listed with only a HOG and no HOS. • If a HOG also becomes HOS (interim or full), s/he is moved to the HOS list and removed from the HOG list for the duration of their tenure. -
© 2010 David Oladipupo Kuranga ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
© 2010 David Oladipupo Kuranga ALL RIGHTS RESERVED INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS: WIELDERS OF POWER IN THE EMERGING INTERNATIONAL ORDER By DAVID OLADIPUPO KURANGA A dissertation submitted to the Graduate School-New Brunswick Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in Political Science Written under the direction of Professor Roy Licklider And approved by _______________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ _______________________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey May, 2010 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION International Organizations: Wielders of Power in the Emerging International Order By DAVID OLADIPUPO KURANGA Dissertation Director: Professor Roy Licklider Do international organizations have power in the international system? This study evaluates the impact of regional international organizations in modern global affairs. The study employs statistical and case study research to uncover the process involved in regional intervention in support of constitutional order. It weighs the impact of regional organizations vis-à-vis regional powers and powerful states at the global- level. The empirical findings show that regional organizations hold power independent and at times greater than powerful states in the international system. Realism remains the dominant theory in international relations, yet current global trends evidenced from this project question the usefulness of realist-based assumptions that states are the sole dominant actors in the international system, even in world filled with international organizations. ii Acknowledgment By the grace of my Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and His never ceasing blessings this work has been completed. This work is a testament of all that He has done for me over the years and so I dedicate this dissertation to Him. -
LET4CAP Law Enforcement Training for Capacity Building MAURITANIA
Co-funded by the Internal Security Fund of the European Union LET4CAP Law Enforcement Training for Capacity Building MAURITANIA Downloadable Country Booklet DL. 2.5 (Version 1.1) 1 Dissemination level: PU Let4Cap Grant Contract no.: HOME/ 2015/ISFP/AG/LETX/8753 Start date: 01/11/2016 Duration: 33 months Dissemination Level PU: Public X PP: Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission) RE: Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission) Revision history Rev. Date Author Notes 1.0 18/05/2018 Ce.S.I. Overall structure and first draft 1.1 30/11/2018 Ce.S.I. Final version LET4CAP_WorkpackageNumber 2 Deliverable_2.5 VER WorkpackageNumber 2 Deliverable Deliverable 2.5 Downloadable country booklets VER 1.1 2 Mauritania Country Information Package 3 This Country Information Package has been prepared by Alessandra Giada Dibenedetto Ce.S.I. Centre for International Studies Within the framework of LET4CAP and with the financial support to the Internal Security Fund of the EU LET4CAP aims to contribute to more consistent and efficient assistance in law enforcement capacity building to third countries. The Project consists in the design and provision of training interventions drawn on the experience of the partners and fine-tuned after a piloting and consolidation phase. © 2018 by LET4CAP…. All rights reserved. 4 Table of contents 1. Country Profile 1.1 Country in Brief 1.2 Modern and Contemporary History of Mauritania 1.3 Geography 1.4 Territorial and Administrative Units 1.5 Population 1.6 Ethnic Groups, Languages, Religion 1.7 Health 1.8 Education and Literacy 1.9 Country Economy 2. -
Du Cericentre D'études
les études du Ceri Centre d’Études et de Recherches Internationales The Technocratic Trajectory and Political Instability of Mauritania 2003-2011 Boris Samuel The Technocratic Trajectory and Political Instability of Mauritania, 2003-2011 Abstract In 2004 the government of Mauritania admitted that for the past ten years its national macroeconomic and financial data had been falsified. This admission revealed a small part of the fraudulent practices that took place during the Taya era which ended in 2005. But it also showed that the economic management of this “good student” had become ensnared in true “bureaucratic anarchy.” Beginning in 2005, when the democratic transition should have enabled the public administration’s house to be put in order, reforms were often motivated by a desire to improve the image of the regime and were thus less than effective. Then, following the elections of 2007, and in the midst of financial scandals, the government developed a technocratic approach which alienated the Mauritanian public who perceived a power vacuum. A new coup d’Etat occurred during the summer of 2008. The “Rectification Movement” of general Abdel Aziz acquired legitimacy as a result of its fight against terrorism in Sahel. Employing populist rhetoric and adopting the moral high ground in the fight against rampant corruption, the Movement favored lax management of resources and tight, even authoritarian, control of public finances. Trajectoire technocratique et instabilité politique en Mauritanie, 2003-2011 Résumé En 2004, le gouvernement mauritanien avouait que les statistiques macroéconomiques et financières nationales étaient falsifiées depuis plus de dix ans. Cet épisode levait un coin du voile sur les pratiques frauduleuses de l’ère Taya, renversé en 2005. -
Zum Scheitern Der Demokratisierung in Mauretanien Bahrenburg, Hannes; Richter, Thomas
www.ssoar.info Nur ein Intermezzo? Zum Scheitern der Demokratisierung in Mauretanien Bahrenburg, Hannes; Richter, Thomas Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Arbeitspapier / working paper Zur Verfügung gestellt in Kooperation mit / provided in cooperation with: GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Bahrenburg, H., & Richter, T. (2008). Nur ein Intermezzo? Zum Scheitern der Demokratisierung in Mauretanien. (GIGA Focus Nahost, 11). Hamburg: GIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies - Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studien, Institut für Nahost-Studien. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-273978 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer CC BY-NC-ND Lizenz This document is made available under a CC BY-NC-ND Licence (Namensnennung-Nicht-kommerziell-Keine Bearbeitung) zur (Attribution-Non Comercial-NoDerivatives). For more Information Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den CC-Lizenzen finden see: Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.de Nummer 11 2008 4,- Euro ISSN 1862-3611 Nur ein Intermezzo? Zum Scheitern der Demokratisierung in Mauretanien Hannes Bahrenburg und Thomas Richter Die im April 2007 viel versprechend begonnene Demokratisierung Mauretaniens wurde abrupt beendet durch den Militärputsch vom 6. August 2008 und die Absetzung des Prä- sidenten Sidi Ould Cheikh Abdallahi, der durch freie Wahlen an die Macht gekommen war. Am 20. Oktober 2008 hat die EU der neuen Staatsführung ein einmonatiges Ultima- tum gestellt, um eine verfassungskonforme Lösung der politischen Krise zu finden. Analyse: Die außerhalb der politischen Institutionen bestehenden informellen Netzwerke bleiben bestimmend für die politischen Verhältnisse in Mauretanien.