Particle Size Analysis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Particle Size Analysis PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS 1 CHARACTERIZATION OF SOLID PARTICLES • SIZE • SHAPE • DENSITY 2 SPHERICITY, 휑푠 Equivalent diameter, Nominal diameter 푆푢푟푓푎푐푒 표푓 푎 푠푝ℎ푒푟푒 표푓 푠푎푚푒 푣표푙푢푚푒 푎푠 푝푎푟푡푐푙푒 • 휑 = 푠 푠푢푟푓푎푐푒 푎푟푒푎 표푓 푡ℎ푒 푝푎푟푡푐푙푒 • Let • 푣푝 = 푣표푙푢푚푒 표푓 푝푎푟푡푐푙푒, 푠푝 = 푠푢푟푓푎푐푒 푎푟푒푎 표푓 푡ℎ푎 푝푎푟푡푐푙푒, • 퐷푝 = 푬풒풖풊풗풂풍풆풏풕 풅풊풂풎풆풕풆풓 = 퐷푎푚푒푡푒푟 표푓 푠푝ℎ푒푟푒 푤ℎ푐ℎ ℎ푎푠 푠푎푚푒 푣표푙푢푚푒 푎푠 푝푎푟푡푐푙푒푣 = 휋 푝 퐷 3 6 푝 2 6푣푝 • Surface area of the sphere of diameter Dp, 푆푝 = 휋퐷푝 = 퐷푝 푆푝 6푣푝 휑푠 = = 푠푝 푠푝퐷푝 It is often difficult to calculate volume of particle, to calculate equivalent diameter, Dp is taken as nominal diameter based on screen analysis or microscopic analysis 3 Sphericity of particles having different shapes Particle Sphericity Sphere 1.0 cube 0.81 Cylinder, length = 0.87 diameter hemisphere 0.84 sand 0.9 Crushed particles 0.6 to 0.8 Flakes 0.2 4 Sphericity, Table 7.1, McCabe Smith • Sphericity of sphere, cube, short cylinders(L=Dp) = 1 5 VOLUME SHAPE FACTOR 3 푣푝 ∝ 퐷푝 3 푣푝 = 푎 퐷푝 Where , a = volume shape factor 휋 휋 For sphere, 푣 = 퐷 3 or 푎 = 푝 6 푝 6 6 Commonly used measurements of particle size 7 Particle size/ units • Equivalent diameter : Diameter of a sphere of equal volume • Nominal size : Based on; Screen analysis and Microscopic analysis • For Non equidimensional particles Diameter is taken as second longest major dimension. • Units: Coarse particles – mm Fine particles in micrometer, nanometers Ultrafine - surface area per unit mass, sq m/gm 8 Particle size determination • Screening > 50 휇푚 • Sedimentation and elutriation - > 1 휇푚 • Permeability method - > 1 휇푚 • Instrumental Particle size analyzers : Electronic particle counter – Coulter Counter, Laser diffraction analysers, Xray or photo sedimentometers, dynamic light scattering techniques 9 Screening • Mesh Number = Number of opening per linear inch 1 • 퐶푙푒푎푟 표푝푒푛푛푔 = − 푊푟푒 푡ℎ푐푘푛푒푠푠 푚푒푠ℎ 푛푢푚푏푒푟 10 Standard Screen Sizes BSS= British Standard Screen IMM= Institute of Mining & Metallurgy U.S. Tyler mesh US. ASTM= American Institute for testing Materials • Ratio of aperture of two consecutive sieves= 2, 2, 4 2 [2, 1.41,1.18] 11 MIXED PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS: Differential and Cumulative Screen Analysis • 퐴푣푒푟푎푔푒 푝푎푟푡푐푙푒 푠푧푒, 퐷 푝 • Mass fraction, 푥 • Cumulative mass fraction , ϕ – Cumulative mass fraction bigger than a particle size – Cumulative mass fraction smaller than a particle size • Differential screen analysis curve – Plot Mass fraction vs Average particle size • Cumulative screen analysis curve – Plot Cumulative mass fraction vs Average particle size 12 13 Sl. Mes Screen Mass Mass Average , Cumulative No. h Opening retained on Fraction particle Cumulative Fraction No. a screen diameter fraction Dpi (cm) 푥= mi/M Smaller mi (gm) 퐷푝 Larger than than 퐷푝 퐷푝 1 1.00 2 3 ----- - Pan 1.00 0.00 푚 = 푀 푥 = 1 14 Differential and Cumulative Screen Analysis Curves 15 MIXED PARTICLE SIZES : Surface area, Specific Surface area, Volume surface mean diameter • 푣푝 = 푣표푙푢푚푒 표푓 푝푎푟푡푐푙푒, • 푠푝 = 푠푢푟푓푎푐푒 푎푟푒푎 표푓 푝푎푟푡푐푙푒, • 퐷푝 = 퐷푎푚푒푡푒푟 표푓 푝푎푟푡푐푙푒 • 휌푝 = 푑푒푛푠푡푦 표푓 푚푎푡푒푟푎푙 • Number of particles in a mass of “m” 푇표푡푎푙 푣표푙푢푚푒 푚 휌 • 푁 = = 푝 푣표푙푢푚푒 표푓 표푛푒 푝푎푟푡푐푙푒 푣푝 • Total surface area: 푚 6푣푝 6푚 6푣푝 • 퐴 = 푁푠푝 = = [휑푠 = ] 푣푝 휌푝 퐷푝휑푠 휑푠휌푝퐷푝 퐷푝푠푝 16 Specific surface area, 퐴푤,area/mass 푚 6푣푝 6푚 6푣푝 • 퐴 = 푁푠푝 = = [휑푠 = ] 푣푝 휌푝 퐷푝휑푠 휑푠휌푝퐷푝 퐷푝푠푝 6푚1 6푚2 6푚푛 • 퐴푡표푡푎푙 = + + ⋯ … . + 휑푠휌푝퐷푝1 휑푠휌푝퐷푝2 휑푠휌푝퐷푝푛 퐴푡표푡푎푙 6푚1/푀 6푚2/푀 6푚푛/푀 • 퐴푤 = = + + ⋯ … . + 푀 휑푠휌푝퐷푝1 휑푠휌푝퐷푝2 휑푠휌푝퐷푝푛 6푥1 6푥2 6푥푛 • 퐴푤 = + + ⋯ … . + 휑푠휌푝퐷푝1 휑푠휌푝퐷푝2 휑푠휌푝퐷푝푛 6 푛 푥푖 • 퐴푤 = =1 휑푠휌푝 퐷푝푖 Volume surface mean diameter [also known as Sauter Diameter] 6 6 1 • 퐷 = = = 푠 휑 휌 퐴 6 푛 푥푖 푛 푥푖 푠 푝 푤 휑푠휌푝 푖=1 푖=1 휑푠휌푝 퐷푝푖 퐷푝푖 17 AVERAGE PARTICLE SIZE • Volume surface mean diameter: 6 1 퐷푠 = = 휑 휌 퐴 =푛 푥 푠 푝 푤 =1 퐷푝 • Arithmetic Mean Diameter: 푛 푛 =1 푁퐷푝 =1 푁퐷푝 퐷푁 = 푛 = =1 푁 푁푇 • Mass Mean diameter 푛 퐷푤 = 푥퐷푝 =1 • Number of particles: 푛 푛 푚 휌푝 1 푚 푁 = 3 푎푛푑 푁푇 = 푁 = 3 푎휌푝 푎퐷푝 =1 =1 퐷푝 18 VOLUME MEAN DIAMETER • Volume mean diameter: Diameter of a particle with average volume: 푇표푡푎푙 푣표푙푢푚푒 3 • 퐴푣푒푟푎푔푒 푝푎푟푡푐푙푒 푣표푙 = = 푎퐷푣 푁푇 푛 푛 푚 휌푝 1 푚 푁 = 3 푎푛푑 푁푇 = 푁 = 3 푎휌푝 푎퐷푝 =1 =1 퐷푝 3 푇표푡푎푙 푣표푙푢푚푒 푀 휌푝 1 휌푝 푎 퐷푣 = = = 푇표푡푎푙 푛푢푚푏푒푟 1 푛 푚 1 푛 푥 =1 3 =1 3 푎휌푝 푎휌푝 퐷푝 퐷푝 1 1/3 퐷 = 푣 푛 푥 =1 3 퐷푝 19 Number of particles Shape Factor a 3 • 푣푝 = 푎퐷푝 푛 푚푖 • 푁푇 = =1 3 푎휌푝퐷푝푖 • Number of particles per unit mass 푛 푛 푁푇 1 푚 1 푥 푁푤 = = 3 = 3 푀 푀 푎휌푝 =1 푎휌푝퐷푝 =1 퐷푝 1 푁푤 = 3 푎휌푝퐷푣 20 Sl. No. Mesh No. Screen Mass Mass Average , Cumulative Opening retained on Fraction particle Cumulative Fraction a screen diameter fraction Dpi (cm) 푥= mi/M Smaller mi (gm) 퐷푝 Larger than, 퐷푝 than퐷푝 4 0 6 25 8 125 10 325 14 250 20 160 28 50 35 20 48 10 65 8 100 6 150 4 200 3 pan 2 21 PROPTERTIES OF MASSES OF PARTICLES • Bulk density or apparent density, 휌푏, is defined as the weigh per unit volume of material including voids inherent in the material as tested. It is a measure of the fluffiness of the material. 푚 푚 푚 휌푏 = = and 휌푡 = 푉푇 푉푝+푉푣 푉푝 • Porosity, It is the ratio of the void volume and bulk volume. 푉 휀 = 푣 푉푇 푉푇 − 푉푝 푉푝 푚 휌 휀 = = 1 − = 1 − 푏 푉푇 푚 푉푇 휌푡 Pourabilityis defined as a measure of the time required for a standard quality of material to flow through a funnel of specified dimension. It characterizes the handling properties of fine particles 22 • Angle of repose,, is defined as the angle formed between sloping side of a cone shaped pile of material and the horizontal if the mass is truly homogeneous, would be equal to m, the angle of internal friction. In practice, the angle of repose is smaller than the angle of internal friction, of those inside the mass and are often drier and sticker. • Coefficient of internal friction is the measure of resistance present when one layer of solids over another layer of same particles. It is defined as: Coeff. Of internal friction =tan m 0 0 • For free flowing material m is between 15 to 30 23 • In solid masses the pressure is not the same in all directions. If pressure is applied in one direction it creates some pressure in other directions, but it is always smaller than the applied pressure. It is minimum I the direction at right angles to the applied pressure. The ratio of the normal pressure to the applied pressure in a mass of solid, is a material constant, generally denoted by K’ 푛표푟푚푎푙 푝푟푒푠푠푢푟푒 1 − 푠푛훼 퐾′ = = 푚 푎푝푝푙푒푑 푝푟푒푠푠푢푟푒 1 + 푠푛훼푚 K’ approaches zero for cohesive solids and free flowing material its value is between 0.36 to 0.6 • Coefficient of external friction is the measure of the resistance at an interface between particles and the wall of different material of construction. Coefficient of External friction = tan S – Where S is the angle of external friction of solid and material.24 SOLIDS CONVEYING 25 • Screw conveyors • Belt conveyors • Bucket elevators • Spaced-Bucket Centrifugal-Discharge Elevators • Spaced-Bucket Positive-Discharge Elevators • Continuous-Bucket Elevators • Super-capacity Continuous-Bucket Elevators • V-Bucket Elevator-Conveyors • Skip Hoists • Vibrating or oscillating conveyors • Continuous flow conveyors • Apron Conveyors • Pneumatic conveyors • Hydraulic Conveyors 26 SELECTION OF CONVEYORS • Capacity requirement : Belt for larger capacity and screw cannot handle large capacity • Length of travel : belt conveyors ; miles, Pneumatic convey 300m, vibrating conveyor even less • Lift or lift and horizontal shift : single or mixed • Material characteristics – chemical and physical, size, friability, flowability abrasiveness, moisture or oxidation effect • Processing requirement; dewatering, heating cooling 27 Screw conveyor • Helicoid ( helix rolled from flat steel bar) or sectional flight mounted on a pipe or shaft rotating in a U shaped trough – Horizontal of slight incline upto 20ofinely divided solids, sticky material, semisolid materials, boiler ash. Etc. – Continuous spiral for dry granular free flowing material – Discontinuous spirals for wet, muddy and thick materials. – Short distance upto about 40m – Types of flow : • Archemedian flow or • Plug flow – Unit operation – mixing, heating & cooling with hollow shaft 28 29 BELT CONVEYORS • Continuous belt passing around two large pulleys at two ends, one drive pulley other tail pulley. – Universal application – Very long distances several km – Speed up to 300m/min 5000tons/hr – Slope upto 30o – Material – neoprene, Teflon, natural rubber, vinyls, cotton, asbestos fibre, etc. – Various designs of idlers – May require cleaning by revolving brush, metal or rubber scraper, taut wire 30 31 Idlers and Plate support arrangements: (a) Flat belt on idler (b) flat belt on continuous plate (c)troughed belt on 20 deg idler (d) troughed belt on 45 deg idler (e) Same as d but with rolls of equal lengths (f) troughed plate on continuous plate 32 33 Feeders to Belt conveyors- Vibratory and Star Feeder 34 BELT CONVEYOR DISCHARGE ARRANGEMENTS: (a) over end pulley (b) over end pulley by reversible shuttle conveyor (c) through travelling tripper(d) through fixed trippers 35 www.bakerybelting.com 36 BUCKET ELEVATOR • Bucket elevator consists of a number of buckets attached to a continuous double strand chain which passes over two pulleys • Solids fed directly to bucket and also scooped up from the bottom. • Emptied from the top by turning of the bucket. • Line speed 1-2m/s 37 BUCKET ELEVATORS (a)Spaced-Bucket Centrifugal-Discharge Elevators (b)Spaced-Bucket Positive-Discharge Elevators (c)Continuous-Bucket Elevators (d)Supercapacity Continuous-Bucket Elevators 38 • Spaced bucket ; Centrifugal discharge – free flowing, fine or small lump material like grain, coal, sand or dry chemicals • Spaced bucket positive discharge- buckets are for sticky materials which tend to lump, inverted for positive discharge, knockers can also be used • Continuous – finely pulverized or fluffy materials, the back of the preceding bucket serves as a discharge chute for the bucket.
Recommended publications
  • How Platonic and Archimedean Solids Define Natural Equilibria of Forces for Tensegrity
    How Platonic and Archimedean Solids Define Natural Equilibria of Forces for Tensegrity Martin Friedrich Eichenauer The Platonic and Archimedean solids are a well-known vehicle to describe Research Assistant certain phenomena of our surrounding world. It can be stated that they Technical University Dresden define natural equilibria of forces, which can be clarified particularly Faculty of Mathematics Institute of Geometry through the packing of spheres. [1][2] To solve the problem of the densest Germany packing, both geometrical and mechanical approach can be exploited. The mechanical approach works on the principle of minimal potential energy Daniel Lordick whereas the geometrical approach searches for the minimal distances of Professor centers of mass. The vertices of the solids are given by the centers of the Technical University Dresden spheres. Faculty of Geometry Institute of Geometry If we expand this idea by a contrary force, which pushes outwards, we Germany obtain the principle of tensegrity. We can show that we can build up regular and half-regular polyhedra by the interaction of physical forces. Every platonic and Archimedean solid can be converted into a tensegrity structure. Following this, a vast variety of shapes defined by multiple solids can also be obtained. Keywords: Platonic Solids, Archimedean Solids, Tensegrity, Force Density Method, Packing of Spheres, Modularization 1. PLATONIC AND ARCHIMEDEAN SOLIDS called “kissing number” problem. The kissing number problem is asking for the maximum possible number of Platonic and Archimedean solids have systematically congruent spheres, which touch another sphere of the been described in the antiquity. They denominate all same size without overlapping. In three dimensions the convex polyhedra with regular faces and uniform vertices kissing number is 12.
    [Show full text]
  • 7 Dee's Decad of Shapes and Plato's Number.Pdf
    Dee’s Decad of Shapes and Plato’s Number i © 2010 by Jim Egan. All Rights reserved. ISBN_10: ISBN-13: LCCN: Published by Cosmopolite Press 153 Mill Street Newport, Rhode Island 02840 Visit johndeetower.com for more information. Printed in the United States of America ii Dee’s Decad of Shapes and Plato’s Number by Jim Egan Cosmopolite Press Newport, Rhode Island C S O S S E M R O P POLITE “Citizen of the World” (Cosmopolite, is a word coined by John Dee, from the Greek words cosmos meaning “world” and politês meaning ”citizen”) iii Dedication To Plato for his pursuit of “Truth, Goodness, and Beauty” and for writing a mathematical riddle for Dee and me to figure out. iv Table of Contents page 1 “Intertransformability” of the 5 Platonic Solids 15 The hidden geometric solids on the Title page of the Monas Hieroglyphica 65 Renewed enthusiasm for the Platonic and Archimedean solids in the Renaissance 87 Brief Biography of Plato 91 Plato’s Number(s) in Republic 8:546 101 An even closer look at Plato’s Number(s) in Republic 8:546 129 Plato shows his love of 360, 2520, and 12-ness in the Ideal City of “The Laws” 153 Dee plants more clues about Plato’s Number v vi “Intertransformability” of the 5 Platonic Solids Of all the polyhedra, only 5 have the stuff required to be considered “regular polyhedra” or Platonic solids: Rule 1. The faces must be all the same shape and be “regular” polygons (all the polygon’s angles must be identical).
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Three-Dimensional Shape of Sand Grains Using Discrete Element Method Nivedita Das University of South Florida
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 5-4-2007 Modeling Three-Dimensional Shape of Sand Grains Using Discrete Element Method Nivedita Das University of South Florida Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons Scholar Commons Citation Das, Nivedita, "Modeling Three-Dimensional Shape of Sand Grains Using Discrete Element Method" (2007). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/689 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Modeling Three-Dimensional Shape of Sand Grains Using Discrete Element Method by Nivedita Das A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering College of Engineering University of South Florida Co-Major Professor: Alaa K. Ashmawy, Ph.D. Co-Major Professor: Sudeep Sarkar, Ph.D. Manjriker Gunaratne, Ph.D. Beena Sukumaran, Ph.D. Abla M. Zayed, Ph.D. Date of Approval: May 4, 2007 Keywords: Fourier transform, spherical harmonics, shape descriptors, skeletonization, angularity, roundness, liquefaction, overlapping discrete element cluster © Copyright 2007, Nivedita Das DEDICATION To my parents..... ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all, I would like to thank my doctoral committee members – Dr. Alaa Ashmawy, Dr. Sudeep Sarkar, Dr. Manjriker Gunaratne, Dr. Abla Zayed and Dr. Beena Sukumaran for their insights and suggestions that have immensely contributed in improving the quality of this dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • Clusters of Polyhedra in Spherical Confinement PNAS PLUS
    Clusters of polyhedra in spherical confinement PNAS PLUS Erin G. Teicha, Greg van Andersb, Daphne Klotsab,1, Julia Dshemuchadseb, and Sharon C. Glotzera,b,c,d,2 aApplied Physics Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; bDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; cDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; and dBiointerfaces Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 Contributed by Sharon C. Glotzer, December 21, 2015 (sent for review December 1, 2015; reviewed by Randall D. Kamien and Jean Taylor) Dense particle packing in a confining volume remains a rich, largely have addressed 3D dense packings of anisotropic particles inside unexplored problem, despite applications in blood clotting, plas- a container. Of these, almost all pertain to packings of ellipsoids monics, industrial packaging and transport, colloidal molecule design, inside rectangular, spherical, or ellipsoidal containers (56–58), and information storage. Here, we report densest found clusters of and only one investigates packings of polyhedral particles inside a the Platonic solids in spherical confinement, for up to N = 60 constit- container (59). In that case, the authors used a numerical algo- uent polyhedral particles. We examine the interplay between aniso- rithm (generalizable to any number of dimensions) to generate tropic particle shape and isotropic 3D confinement. Densest clusters densest packings of N = ð1 − 20Þ cubes inside a sphere. exhibit a wide variety of symmetry point groups and form in up to In contrast, the bulk densest packing of anisotropic bodies has three layers at higher N. For many N values, icosahedra and do- been thoroughly investigated in 3D Euclidean space (60–65).
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Particles and Particle Systems
    W. Pabst / E. Gregorová Characterization of particles and particle systems ICT Prague 2007 Tyto studijní materiály vznikly v rámci projektu FRVŠ 674 / 2007 F1 / b Tvorba předmětu “Charakterizace částic a částicových soustav“. PABST & GREGOROVÁ (ICT Prague) Characterization of particles and particle systems – 1 CPPS−1. Introduction – Particle size + equivalent diameters 1.0 Introduction Particle size is one of the most important parameters in materials science and technology as well as many other branches of science and technology, from medicine, pharmacology and biology to ecology, energy technology and the geosciences. In this introduction we give an overview on the content of this lecture course and define the most important measures of size (equivalent diameters). 1.1 A brief guide through the contents of this course This course concerns the characterization of individual particles (size, shape and surface) as well as many-particle systems. The theoretical backbone is the statistics of small particles. Except for sieve classification (which has lost its significance for particle size analysis today, although it remains an important tool for classification) the most important particle size analysis methods are treated in some detail, in particular • sedimentation methods, • laser diffraction, • microscopic image analysis, as well as other methods (dynamic light scattering, electrozone sensing, optical particle counting, XRD line profile analysis, adsorption techniques and mercury intrusion). Concerning image analysis, the reader is referred also to our lecture course “Microstructure and properties of porous materials” at the ICT Prague, where complementary information is given, which goes beyond the scope of the present lecture. The two final units concern timely practical applications (aerosols and nanoparticles, suspension rheology and nanofluids).
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Sphericity a Measure of the Sphericity of a Convex Solid Was Introduced by G
    Integre Technical Publishing Co., Inc. College Mathematics Journal 42:2 January 6, 2011 11:00 a.m. aravind.tex page 98 How Spherical Are the Archimedean Solids and Their Duals? P. K. Aravind P. K. Aravind is a Professor of Physics at Worcester Polytechnic Institute. He received his B.Sc. and M.Sc. degrees in Physics from Delhi University in Delhi, India, and his Ph.D. degree in Physics from Northwestern University. His research in recent years has centered around Bell’s theorem and quantum information theory, and particularly the role that polytopes, such as the 600-cell, play in it. For the last fifteen years he has taught in a summer program called Frontiers, conducted by WPI for bright high school students who are interested in pursuing mathematics, science, or engineering in college. A molecule of C-60, or a “Buckyball”, consists of 60 carbon atoms arranged at the vertices of a truncated icosahedron (see Figure 1), with the atoms being held in place by covalent bonds. The Buckyball has a very spherical appearance and its sphericity is the basis of several of its applications, such as a nanoscale ball bearing or a molecular cage to trap other atoms [10]. The buckyball pattern also occurs on the surface of many soccer balls. The huge interest in the Buckyball leads one to ask whether the truncated icosahedron is the most spherical of the elementary geometrical forms or whether there are others that are superior to it. That is the question I address in this paper. The reader who is familiar with the Archimedean solids and their duals is invited to try and guess the most spherical among them before reading on.
    [Show full text]
  • Hybrid Carbon Orbitals and Structures of Carbon Cage Clusters
    International Journal of Chemistry and Applications. ISSN 0974-3111 Volume 8, Number 1 (2016), pp. 1-11 © International Research Publication House http://www.irphouse.com Hybrid Carbon Orbitals and Structures of Carbon Cage Clusters Arjun Tan*, AlmuatasimAlomari, Marius Schamschula and Vernessa Edwards Department of Physics, Alabama A & M University, Normal, AL 35762, U. S. A. *E-Mail: arjun. tan@aamu. edu Abstract The formation of Carbon cage clusters having regular and semi-regular polyhedral structures is studied from orbital hybridization considerations. It is found that only sp2 hybridized Carbon atoms are capable of forming closed cage structures. Three criteria, viz., bond, bond angle and solid angle criteria are applied. It is found that only one Platonic solid and four Archimedean solids are capable of supporting Carbon cage cluster structures. Specifically, the Dodecahedron, Truncated Octahedron, Great Rhombicuboctahedron, Truncated Icosahedron and Great Rhomicosidodecahedron are able to represent the structures of C20, C24, C48, C60 and C120 clusters, respectively. 1. INTRODUCTION Since the discovery of the Buckyballs and Fullerenes, there has been an explosion of the study of Carbon clusters having cage-like structures [1, 2]. It has been suggested that small Carbon clusters can have linear and ring structures and only the larger clusters can have closed cage structures [3]. The possibility of smaller clusters having cage structures has put forward [4, 5]. It was suggested that the Platonic solids and Archimedean solids could provide potential structures for Carbon cage clusters [4, 5]. Bond limitations and sphericity were postulated to be the requirements for such possibilities [4, 5]. The present study re-examines this problem from the standpoint of atomic orbitals configurations, bond angles and solid angle considerations.
    [Show full text]
  • Complexity, Sphericity, and Ordering of Regular and Semiregular Polyhedra
    MATCH MATCH Commun. Math. Comput. Chem. 54 (2005) 137-152 Communications in Mathematical and in Computer Chemistry ISSN 0340 - 6253 Complexity, sphericity, and ordering of regular and semiregular polyhedra Alexandru T. Balaban a and Danail Bonchev b a Texas A&M University at Galveston, MARS, Galveston, TX 77551, USA b Virginia Commonwealth University, CSBC, Richmond, VA 23284-2030, USA (Received October 20, 2004) Abstract. The five Platonic (regular) polyhedra may be ordered by various numerical indicators according to their complexity. By using the number of their vertices, the solid angle, and information theoretic indices one obtains a consistent ordering for the Platonic polyhedra. For the thirteen semiregular Archimedean polyhedra these criteria provide for the first time an ordering in terms of their complexity. Introduction Polyhedral hydrocarbons (CH)2k with k = 2, 4, and 10 are valence isomers of annulenes. Only three of the five Platonic polyhedra fulfill the condition of corresponding to cubic graphs, whose vertices of degree three can symbolize CH groups. Eaton’s cubane (k = 4) is stable despite its steric strain, and its nitro-derivatives are highly energetic materials. Paquette’s synthesis of dodecahedrane (k = 10) was a momentous achievement, equaled soon afterwards by a different synthesis due to Prinzbach. Tetrahedrane (k = 2) is unstable but Maier’s tetra-tert-butyltetrahedrane is a stable compound. For details and some literature data, see ref.1 Other chemically relevant references are collected in the final section of this article. - 138 - The complexity concept can be treated scientifically by listing the factors that influence it.2-7 For graphs and other similar mathematical concepts, these factors include branching and cyclicity.
    [Show full text]
  • Maximally Random Jammed Packings of Platonic Solids: Hyperuniform Long-Range Correlations and Isostaticity
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E 84, 041309 (2011) Maximally random jammed packings of Platonic solids: Hyperuniform long-range correlations and isostaticity Yang Jiao1 and Salvatore Torquato1,2,* 1Princeton Institute of the Science and Technology of Materials, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA 2Department of Chemistry and Physics, Princeton Center for Theoretical Science, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey 08544, USA (Received 10 July 2011; published 31 October 2011) We generate maximally random jammed (MRJ) packings of the four nontiling Platonic solids (tetrahedra, octahedra, dodecahedra, and icosahedra) using the adaptive-shrinking-cell method [S. Torquato and Y. Jiao, Phys.Rev.E80, 041104 (2009)]. Such packings can be viewed as prototypical glasses in that they are maximally disordered while simultaneously being mechanically rigid. The MRJ packing fractions for tetrahedra, octahedra, dodecahedra, and icosahedra are, respectively, 0.763 ± 0.005, 0.697 ± 0.005, 0.716 ± 0.002, and 0.707 ± 0.002. We find that as the number of facets of the particles increases, the translational order in the packings increases while the orientational order decreases. Moreover, we show that the MRJ packings are hyperuniform (i.e., their infinite-wavelength local-number-density fluctuations vanish) and possess quasi-long-range pair correlations that decay asymptotically with scaling r−4. This provides further evidence that hyperuniform quasi-long-range correlations are a universal feature of MRJ packings of frictionless particles of general shape. However, unlike MRJ packings of ellipsoids, superballs, and superellipsoids, which are hypostatic, MRJ packings of the nontiling Platonic solids are isostatic. We provide a rationale for the organizing principle that the MRJ packing fractions for nonspherical particles with sufficiently small asphericities exceed the corresponding value for spheres (∼0.64).
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of the Roundest Soccer Ball
    Adaptables2006, TU/e, International Conference On Adaptable Building Structures 6-115 Eindhoven The Netherlands 03-05 July 2006 In Search of the Roundest Soccer Ball Dr. Ir. Pieter Huybers Retired Ass. Professor of Delft University of Technology Oosterlee 16, 2678 AZ, De Lier, The Netherlands [email protected] KEYWORDS Soccer balls, polyhedra, isodistance, inflatables. 1 The present ball form is not ideal Nowadays soccer balls usually have an outer skin of synthetic leather (a polyurethane coating on polyester fabric) and a flexible inner bladder which after inflation gives the ball its final spherical shape. The skin is generally composed of 12 equilateral pentagons and 20 hexagons, sewn together according a special pattern. This principle is used by many firms. a b c d Figure 1. Subdivision pattern based on the Truncated Icosahedron. The components are cut from a flat sheet of material and as long as they are flat, they form the faces of a mathematical solid, known as the Truncated Icosahedron. This shape is obtained by cutting off (‘truncating’) small pyramidal caps at the twelve vertices of the regular Icosahedron , that itself is composed of twenty regular triangles. M M Figure 2. The principle of truncation of an Icosahedron at the distance z 5 and z 3, were the latter is similar to the distance of the triangles from the polyhedron centre M. All vertices of this new form have the same distance from the centre M of the solid. This distance, R1 in Fig. 2, is called the radius of the circum-scribed sphere. The ball must receive its final round form Adaptables2006, TU/e, International Conference On Adaptable Building Structures 6-116 Eindhoven The Netherlands 03-05 July 2006 by the inflation of an elastic internal bladder.
    [Show full text]
  • Defining Shape Measures for 3D Star-Shaped Particles: Sphericity
    Defining Shape Measures for 3D Star-Shaped Particles: Sphericity, Roundness, and Dimensions1 Jeffrey W. Bullard, Edward J. Garboczi Materials and Structural Systems Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, Maryland USA 20899-8615 Abstract Truncated spherical harmonic expansions are used to approximate the shape of 3D star-shaped par- ticles including a wide range of axially symmetric ellipsoids, cuboids, and over 40 000 real particles drawn from seven different material sources. This mathematical procedure enables any geometric property to be calculated for these star-shaped particles. Calculations are made of properties such as volume, surface area, triaxial dimensions, the maximum inscribed sphere, and the minimum enclosing sphere, as well as differential geometric properties such as surface normals and principal curvatures, and the values are compared to the analytical values for well-characterized geometric shapes. We find that a particle's Krumbein triaxial dimensions, widely used in the sedimentary geology literature, are essentially identical numerically to the length, width, and thickness dimen- sions that are used to characterize gravel shape in the construction aggregate industry. Of these dimensions, we prove that the length is a lower bound on a particle's minimum enclosing sphere diameter and that the thickness is an upper bound on its maximum inscribed sphere diameter. We examine the \true sphericity" and the shape entropy, and we also introduce a new spheric- ity factor based on the radius ratio of the maximum inscribed sphere to the minimum enclosing sphere. This bounding sphere ratio, which can be calculated numerically or approximated from macroscopic dimensions, has the advantage that it is less sensitive to surface roughness than the 1Powder Technol., 249 (2013) 241{252 1 true sphericity.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2104.06829V1 [Cond-Mat.Stat-Mech] 14 Apr 2021 and Thus Trigonometric Functions
    Newtonian Event-Chain Monte Carlo and Collision Prediction with Polyhedral Particles Marco Klement,1 Sangmin Lee,2, 3 Joshua A. Anderson,2 and Michael Engel1, a) 1)Institute for Multiscale Simulation, IZNF, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, 91058 Erlangen, Germany 2)Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA 3)Department of Biochemistry, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA (Dated: 15 April 2021) Polyhedral nanocrystals are building blocks for nanostructured materials that find applications in catalysis and plasmonics. Synthesis efforts and self-assembly experiments have been assisted by computer simulations that predict phase equilibra. Most current simulations employ Monte Carlo methods, which generate stochastic dynamics. Collective and correlated configuration updates are alternatives that promise higher computational efficiency and generate trajectories with realistic dynamics. One such alternative involves event-chain updates and has recently been proposed for spherical particles. In this contribution, we develop and apply event- chain Monte Carlo for hard convex polyhedra. Our simulation makes use of an improved computational geometry algorithm XenoSweep, which predicts sweep collision in a particularly simple way. We implement Newtonian event chains in the open source general-purpose particle simulation toolkit HOOMD-blue for serial and parallel simulation. The speed-up over state-of-the-art Monte Carlo is between a factor of 10 for nearly spherical polyhedra and a factor of 2 for highly aspherical polyhedra. Finally, we validate the Newtonian event-chain algorithm by applying it to a current research problem, the multi-step nucleation of two classes of hard polyhedra. such case are hard particles, in which shape alone is the dominating factor.
    [Show full text]