Scottish Leftreview

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Scottish Leftreview ScottishLeft Review Issue 115 January/February 2020 - £2.00 'best re(a)d' homeless please help 1 - ScottishLeftReview Issue 115 January/February 2020 feedback comment Regroup and resist – but how? ell, the polls were stunningly the editorial for the September/October class. The fly in the ointment was that accurate so we well and truly 2019 issue of Scottish Left Reviewsaid: Labour left activists thought it would be had our ‘Friday the thirteenth’. the vote winner and forgot at the same W Meantime, Labour continues to get a Welcome, readers, subscribers and time that the credibility of the overall ‘sore arse’ by sitting as many different supporters then to an unhappy New message – ‘real change … for the many ways as possible on the Brexit fence. Year. We’ll all need 2020 vision to get not the few’ - contained in the manifesto It’s understandable given the split over through this year and the next ones was dependent upon things other than Brexit amongst its core supporters. because it’s all too glib to say all we reviewsthe manifesto itself (like Corbyn). But it would have been far better to need to do is just resist and rebel. For have declared a crystal-clear position This brings us to the situation in a start, that doesn’t take account of – whatever that may have been – take Scotland. But before getting there, some the difficulties in doing so before 12 the inevitable, short-term hit and then perspective is needed. The Tories won December 2019 – like the sabotage of move on to campaigning on that position 365 seats (+47) with just under 14m the Labour right, the timidity of the instead of ever grudgingly changing on votes (43.6%, +1.2%) while Labour won SNP leadership, the division over Brexit, shifting sands. 203 (-59) with just 10m votes (32.1%, falling union membership and the like. -7.9%). This may suggest the result was And after 12 December 2019, the hold Labour’s final position on Brexit took that rather more a Labour defeat than a of many of these forces will be all the to the nth degree. Polling analyst firm, Tory victory. And, though Labour won stronger. Plus, there’s the demoralisation Datapraxis, calculated that a maximum 2.5m less votes than in 2017, it wasn’t of those who campaigned for a Labour of 0.8m Labour voters switched to the the worst result since 1935 as the government – given that many saw the Tories, while the Lib Dems gained at mainstream media like to say because manifesto as seeking to deliver socialism- least 1.1 million votes from Labour, the that only looks at the parliamentary and the divisions amongst the working Greens 339,000 and the SNP a quarter of arithmetic. In their time, Blair, Brown, class with many having voted Tory for a million. Miliband and Kinnock fought elections the first time. Then there’s the issue of Corbyn where Labour won fewer votes. Let’s start with one unpalatable truth himself. Whilst we must not forget that This again highlights the thoroughly which only hindsight can now really it is wholly unhealthy in any type of reprehensible nature of our first-past- verify. The election was won by the Tories democracy to so heavily have the fate of the-post voting system and the virtues of long before the election was called. a political party tied to the fate of their proportional representation. According to the polls, it was in August leader – and which forces in our political So, Scotland was an unmitigated disaster just after Johnson was elected Tory culture are responsible for this, Corbyn for Labour with only one of the most leader. What this signifies is that issues did not measure up. Before the election right-wing of Labour MPs being the like how Brexit, anti-Semitism, media – like over the dispatch box at PMQs (sole) one to be returned. Although far scrutiny and so on had taken their toll on – he so often failed to hit the target or from the only factor contributing to this Labour long before the 29 October when land a killer blow. In the election itself, near wipe-out, it’s hard to understand the election was called. There was only he looked tired and lacklustre. His rage the stupid tribalism inherent in politics the smallest amount of regaining ground seemed somewhat unconvincing. Of in Scotland that stopped Labour from by Labour in the face of a twin juggernaut course, it didn’t help that the media saying, even opportunistically: ‘We’ll of the Tories and the SNP. mostly gave Johnson a free ride. But it’s support the democratic right to have a also the case that Johnson was fairly Unfortunately, Labour was in so many second referendum on independence. Teflon-like because of the frustration ways the author of its own fate. It But when it comes, we’ll campaign over Brexit and his promise to ‘Get Brexit didn’t recognise that its 2017 campaign against independence.’ Ironically, that is Done’. couldn’t simply be replicated for 2019. the position of the Scottish Labour left Sure, Labour led by Corbyn could be All this is such a pity because Labour’s allies, the Communist Party. Instead, expected to have come under fierce manifesto was genuinely radical and what we had was Richard Leonard’s attack. That should have been taken progressive. It wasn’t socialist and more hard-line opposition to a second as read, prepared for and batted off. couldn’t deliver socialism per se as referendum than that of Corbyn and Even during the election campaign, the many supporters insisted. Recall the McDonnell. This does not sit well with attacks for (wrongly) being anti-Semitic unfortunate use of the ‘A Britain that Scottish Labour’s support for the Claim of could have been prepared for. Only the works for all’ phrase. But it could have Rights. Only now are some senior voices charge of being anti-Semitic was new in made a massive and positive difference in Scottish Labour – like Neil Findlay and any sense - albeit from 2016. On Brexit, to the material conditions of the working Monica Lennon – as well as hundreds 2 - ScottishLeftReview Issue 115 January/February 2020 of left activists via Scottish Labour for We’ll get some sense of this from the it will not countenance an unofficial Radical Democracy breaking cover to elections for leader and deputy-leader referendum or extra-parliamentary say that. Instead, Scottish Labour policy positions fairly soon. How will Johnson’s action. What difference will Scottish in the election was not support for a professed ‘one nation’ Toryism fair Labour’s new – yet to be defined - second referendum unless the SNP won under the tensions between free traders constitutional offer have on its level of a mandate for it in the 2021 Holyrood and protectionists, liberals and social support? elections. If it holds to that line in any conservatives and ‘true blue’ southern We asked these and many other discernible way, then it will easily gift shires and ‘blue collar’ northern Britain questions based around a ‘what the SNP that policy commitment (and to within the Tories? happened?’ and ‘what do we do now?’ the exclusion of growing discontent over In Scotland, most immediately we need perspective to a range of left activists the SNP Scottish Government’s handling to think about the Alex Salmond trial of health, education and transport). and commentators. We hope that out which begins on 9 March. Whatever the Scottish Labour will likely face another of this some consensus may begin to outcome, the SNP will be damaged as wipe-out in those 2021 elections emerge and then out of that consensus Salmond is pitted against Sturgeon. But some action may be taken because in the That the SNP won (effectively) 48 seats who will be the beneficiary and what battles ahead, words will only be worth given the situation in Kirkcaldy and will it do for support for independence? anything if they result in effective action. Cowdenbeath is all the more significant Further ahead, is the third in a row In this regard, some have mentioned when one considers its manifesto was (2015, 2017, 2019) win for the SNP ‘getting the [non-Tory cross-party] thin and based upon fairly explicit at Westminster the beginning of a band back together’ of in the form of a support for independence and stopping permanent trend for it? Will the results Constitutional Convention from 1989 or Brexit. But, again, some perspective is of the Holyrood elections in 2021 a Scotland United from 1992. Recalling needed as this was not quite the re-run cement this in the run-up to the 2024 both these phenomena, it seems of 2015 when the SNP won 56 of the Westminster election? Most would apparent that the mass mobilisations of 59 seats. The Tories still have six seats expect a Tory Westminster government Scotland United will be necessary but albeit it down from 13 in 2017 and are to be a great recruiting sergeant for the they will only become sufficient when now confined to the Borders and the SNP and the cause of independence part and parcel of a wider programme of north-east. The lack of a surge from the (especially as a left unionist project is in political change. LibDems was epitomised by Jo Swinson decline or on the defensive now). But, • losing her seat. The extent of the SNP Although this ‘thanks’ should have gone probably, the most strategic dilemma in the last issue of 2019, the editorial victory is better measured by recognising for the SNP is that having won so committee of the magazine wish to that from 2017 to 2019, the party’s handsomely again, how will it not look publicly record their gratitude to all share of the vote went up from 37% to impotent and adrift when a Section 30 those involved the in the production and 45%, with the Tories falling from 29% Order is again rejected? How long can it publication of Scottish Left Review – the to 25% and Labour sliding from 27% to dial up the rhetoric without seeming like proofers, the readers, the cover designer, the typesetter, the web uploader, the 19%.
Recommended publications
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Thursday Volume 669 19 December 2019 No. 3 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 19 December 2019 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. Chronology of The Parliamentary Debates The Parliamentary History contains all that can be collected of the Legislative History of this country from the Conquest to the close of the XVIIIth Century (1803), 36 vols. The chief sources whence these Debates are derived are the Constitutional History, 24 vols.; Sir Simonds D’Ewes’ Journal; Debates of the Commons in 1620 and 1621; Chandler and Timberland’s Debates, 22 vols.; Grey’s Debates of the Commons, from 1667 to 1694, 10 vols.; Almons Debates, 24 vols.; Debrett’s Debates, 63 vols.; The Hardwicke Papers; Debates in Parliament by Dr. Johnson, &c. &c. THE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES commenced with the year 1803, and the contents are set forth in the following Chronological Table:— HISTORY (EIGHTH PARLIAMENT) CONQUEST TO 34 GEO. II.—1066 to 1760 Vol. 16 ..........................7 GEO. IV. ...........1826 Vol.1to15.1Will.Ito34Geo.II — 17 ..........................8 — ...........1827 1066-1760 — 18 & 19..................9 — ...........1828 REIGN OF GEO. III.—1760 to 1820 — 20—21 .................10 — ...........1829 Vol. 15 to 35. Geo. III to 40 Geo. III. — 22 to 25 ...............11 — ...........1830 1760—1800 Third Series PARLIAMENTS OF UNITED KINGDOM OF REIGN OF WILLIAM IV. —1830 to 1837 GREAT BRITAIN AND IRELAND (NINTH PARLIAMENT) (FIRST PARLIAMENT) Vol. 1 to 3.....................1 WILL. IV. .......1830-1 Vol. 35.........................41 GEO.
    [Show full text]
  • The 91 Mps Who Voted Against Article 50 Being Triggered by March Name Email Address Party Kenneth Clarke [email protected] C
    The 91 MPs who voted against Article 50 being triggered by March Name Email Address Party Kenneth Clarke [email protected] Conservative Caroline Lucas [email protected] Green Natalie McGarry [email protected] Independent Michelle Thomson [email protected] Independent Rushanara Ali [email protected] Labour Graham Allen [email protected] Labour Ben Bradshaw [email protected] Labour Ann Coffey [email protected] Labour Neil Coyle [email protected] Labour Stella Creasy [email protected] Labour Geraint Davies [email protected] Labour Jim Dowd [email protected] Labour Louise Ellman [email protected] Labour Chris Evans [email protected] Labour Paul Farrelly [email protected] Labour Mike Gapes [email protected] Labour Helen Hayes [email protected] Labour Meg Hillier [email protected] Labour Peter Kyle [email protected] Labour David Lammy [email protected] Labour Chris Leslie [email protected] Labour Ian Murray [email protected] Labour Barry Sheerman [email protected] Labour Tulip Siddiq [email protected] Labour Angela Smith [email protected] Labour Catherine West [email protected] Labour Daniel Zeichner [email protected] Labour Tom Brake (teller) [email protected] Lib Dem Alistair Carmichael [email protected] Lib Dem Nick Clegg [email protected] Lib Dem Tim Farron
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Borders Scotland
    Beyond Borders Summer Programme 2016 Including the Programme for the Beyond Borders International Festival of Literature & Thought 27–28 August 2016 Contents Welcome 1 2 Beyond Borders Scotland is once again Beyond Borders International Women in Conflict proud to welcome a host of local and international writers, diplomats, politicians, Festival of Literature & Thought Peace Initiative broadcasters, and artists to the Beyond 3 Introduction 29 Introduction Borders International Festival of 4 Festival Programme at a Glance 31 Performing Arts Literature & Thought at Traquair House 9 Saturday Programme 31 Film to exchange ideas and experiences about 15 Sunday Programme 31 Visual Arts some of the most pressing issues facing 23 Weekend-Long Events & Exhibitions us at home and abroad. Mark Muller Stuart QC This brochure includes all the information Founder & Executive you need to enjoy our summer programme 3 4 Director of international debates, historical and literary talks, films, visual and performing arts; literary walks; cycle rides; lectures; Beyond Borders Film Festival Beyond Borders in Cooperation and dialogue events across Edinburgh 32 Introduction 38 Introduction and the Scottish Borders. 33 Day 1 & 2 39 Asylum Monologues This year we are also delighted to welcome 34 Day 3 & 4 39 Queens of Syria female peacemakers from Syria, Yemen, 36 Day 5 & 6 40 Festival of Politics Libya, Iraq, and Turkey to Scotland to take 37 Day 7 40 Rule of Law Lecture part in our 1325 Fellowship Programme, 41 Summerhall: Associated Shows which is supported by the Scottish Government and the United Nations. After another year of truly dramatic 5 domestic and international events, why not come to the beautiful Scottish Borders and delve deeper into issues About Us affecting our world by listening to 45 Introduction Beyond Borders Scotland beguiling stories from a remarkable 46 Project & Dialogue Work @beyondborders_ gathering of Scottish and international 49 The Team Beyond Borders Scotland thinkers and cultural leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • August 2018 Newsletter
    NEWSLETTER August 2018 All Saints’ is a Registered Scottish charity No. SC013161 IN THIS EDITION Dear reader Before you progress further, high praise and hearty thanks are due to Ann Loades and Eileen Reynolds for all their work over the past years editing and producing the Newsletter. They are taking a well-deserved rest. You may recall that recent legal requirements for data protection have required us to have documentary evidence of people requesting the Newsletter. This change has sadly blunted some of Ann and Eileen’s creative effort in forming a database to help keep us in touch with our dispersed community. While we’re very grateful for those who have already given their consent, we hope that those who have yet to do so will use the enclosed form, printed at the back of the Newsletter on page 23. However, after this edition, we regret that we will not be able to send you the newsletter until you contact us requesting it in some written form. Meanwhile, it has been a very busy summer. During July, many in the town celebrated the 700th anniversary of the consecration of the Cathedral of St Andrew with various events in the ruins and elsewhere. On returning from one of these I read a letter from Stephen Gethins MP about an Early Day Motion that he had sponsored, which read as follows: That this House notes that 5 July 2018 will mark the 700th anniversary of the consecration of St Andrews Cathedral that took place after 150 years of construction; considers the important role that the Cathedral has played in Scotland's history with the consecration coming just four years after the battle of Bannockburn and the Cathedral continuing to play an important role until its destruction during the Reformation; welcomes the programme of events that are taking place to mark the 700th anniversary in St Andrews; encourages visitors to come and visit St Andrews and the Cathedral during this historic year; and further welcomes the important role that churches in St Andrews and indeed all faith groups continue to play in local communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Arts Lottery Funding Recipient Constituencies Per Capita, 2015 & 2016 Combined
    Arts Lottery funding recipient constituencies per capita, 2015 & 2016 combined Published 25 May 2017 Following on from The Stage article ‘Revealed: Which UK constituencies get the most – and least – Lottery cash for the arts’ below is the full list of Arts Lottery funding across 659 UK Parliamentary Constituencies per capita. DCMS publishes details of all lottery grant recipients on their website. If you combine all ‘Arts’ awards across the UK in 2015 and 2016 and then divide by the overall size of the electorate, the average per capita amount per constituent across the UK is £13.10, excluding the 1,928 grants worth £101 million that were not designated to a constituency (16% of the total amount of grants awarded). £ Total Arts Lottery £ Per UK Constituency MP Grants Capita 2014 & 2015 1 Leeds Central Hilary Benn (L) 46,596,403 569.65 2 Cities of London and Westminster Mark Field (C) 34,290,940 562.22 3 Birmingham, Ladywood Shabana Mahmood (L) 33,109,864 485.99 4 Cardiff South and Penarth Stephen Doughty (L Co-op) 25,727,041 338.49 5 Islington South and Finsbury Emily Thornberry (L) 14,673,010 215.38 6 Glasgow Central Alison Thewliss (SNP) 12,337,293 173.9 7 Hackney South and Shoreditch Meg Hillier (L Co-op) 10,926,061 128.59 8 Manchester Central Lucy Powell (L Co-op) 10,701,760 124.33 9 Vauxhall Kate Hoey (L) 10,020,186 121.85 10 Bristol West Thangam Debbonaire (L) 10,427,938 114.3 11 Edinburgh East Tommy Sheppard (SNP) 7,375,694 109.85 12 Poole Robert Syms (C) 7,904,345 108.94 13 Bermondsey and Old Southwark Neil Coyle (L) 8,514,689
    [Show full text]
  • Article 50 Negotiations: Implications of ‘No Deal’
    House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee Article 50 negotiations: Implications of ‘no deal’ Ninth Report of Session 2016–17 EMBARGOED ADVANCE COPY: Not to be published in full, or in part, in any form before 00.01 a.m. on Sunday 12 March 2017 HC 1077 part, in or full, in 2017 published be to March 12 Not Sunday COPY: on a.m. ADVANCE00.01 before form EMBARGOEDany in part, in or full, in 2017 published be to March 12 Not Sunday COPY: on House of Commons a.m. Foreign Affairs Committee ADVANCE00.01 Article 50 negotiations: before Implications of ‘no deal’ form Ninth Report of Session 2016–17 EMBARGOEDany in Report, together with formal minutes and appendices relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 7 March 2017 by authority of the House of Commons Published on 12 March 2017 HC 1077 The Foreign Affairs Committee The Foreign Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Crispin Blunt MP (Conservative, Reigate) (Chair) Mr John Baron MP (Conservative, Basildon and Billericay) Ann Clwyd MP (Labour, Cynon Valley) part, Mike Gapes MP (Labour (Co-op), Ilford South) in Stephen Gethins MP (Scottish National Party, North East Fife) or Mr Mark Hendrick MP (Labour (Co-op), Preston) full, Adam Holloway MP (Conservative, Gravesham) in Daniel Kawczynski MP (Conservative, Shrewsbury and Atcham) Ian Murray MP (Labour, Edinburgh South) Andrew Rosindell MP (Conservative, Romford) 2017 Nadhim Zahawi MP (Conservative, Stratford-on-Avon) published be Powers to March The Committee is one of the departmental select committees,12 the powers of which are set out in House of CommonsNot Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152.
    [Show full text]
  • General Election 2019: Target Seats
    Dods Monitoring: General Election 2019 General Election 2019 General Election 2019: Target Seats 11th November 2019 Dods Monitoring: General Election 2019 Overview Irrespective of Boris Johnson’s position in the polls, if the Conservatives wish to return to Government with a working majority, they will need to retain seats as well gain them. It is expected that the party will lose seats in remain constituencies to the Liberal Democrats, as well as leave constituencies if the Brexit party stand and divide the votes. With memories of the 2017 General Election still present in the mind of all parties, the pressure is on. Seats across Scotland, the North and London are at risk and whilst Johnson appears to be soaring ahead, these are areas he needs to retain if he wishes to return to Parliament with a strong majority. Nigel Farage, the leader of the Brexit Party, has confirmed that the party will only stand candidates in seats the Conservative party failed to win in 2017. This move marks a change of heart for Farage, who had said previously that he would only enter an electoral pact if the Conservatives dropped their Brexit deal. The decision is likely to help the Conservatives keep seats which they currently hold and will place pres- sure on leave-voting Labour seats, of which it is estimated is 59 out of their top 100 target seats. Target seats have always played a vital role in General Elections; however, the pressure is ever mounting after the result of the 2017 General Election which left Labour 64 seats short of an overall majority and the Conservatives 29 seats away from a majority.
    [Show full text]
  • Press Release
    PRESS RELEASE No: 599/2017 Date: 9th October 2017 Gibraltar discusses Brexit and Health with Scotland Brexit and Health has so far dominated Gibraltar’s attendance at the conference of the Scottish National Party in Glasgow. The Deputy Chief Minister Dr Joseph Garcia, who is responsible for work related to Gibraltar’s departure from the European Union, took the opportunity to exchange views on this matter with Scotland’s External Relations Minister Fiona Hyslop MSP and Brexit Minister Michael Russell MSP. Health Minister Neil Costa and Medical Director Daniel Cassaglia were able to have preliminary discussions with Scottish Health Minister Shona Robison MSP in order to examine the scope for greater cooperation in the area of Health and Care between Gibraltar and Scotland. They also met Stephen Gethins MP, who shadows International Relations and Europe, at Westminster where the SNP are the third largest party. There were also separate meetings with Joanna Cherry MP, who leads on Justice and Home Affairs, and Alasdair Allan MSP, who is the Minister for Europe of the Scottish Government. Dr Garcia said that there was considerable interest in the Brexit work that Gibraltar was doing and added that it was important for Scotland and Gibraltar to learn more about each other’s experiences as this process unfolded. “Neither Gibraltar nor Scotland voted to leave the European Union which makes it all the more important to exchange views and better understand our different priorities,” he said. Deputy Chief Minister • HM Government of Gibraltar • 6 Convent Place • Gibraltar GX11 1AA t +350 20059267 f +350 20059271 e [email protected] w www.gibraltar.gov.gi .
    [Show full text]
  • Monday 23 November 2015 Order Paper No.68: Part 2
    Monday 23 November 2015 Order Paper No.68: Part 2 FUTURE BUSINESS A. CALENDAR OF BUSINESS Business in either Chamber may be changed, and further business added, up to the rising of the House on the day before it is to be taken, and is therefore provisional. Government items of business in this section have nominally been set down for today, but are expected to be taken on the dates stated. B. REMAINING ORDERS AND NOTICES Business in this section has not yet been scheduled for a specific date. It has been nominally set down for today but is not expected to be taken today. 22 Monday 23 November 2015 OP No.68: Part 2 CALENDAR OF BUSINESS A. CALENDAR OF BUSINESS Business in either Chamber may be changed, and further business added, up to the rising of the House on the day before it is to be taken, and is therefore provisional. TUESDAY 24 NOVEMBER CHAMBER 11.30am Questions to the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs 12.15pm Topical Questions to the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs Afterwards Protection of Family Homes (Enforcement and Permitted Development): Ten Minute Rule Motion Steve McCabe That leave be given to bring in a Bill to make provision about guidance to local authorities on when to take enforcement action for breaches of planning law; to clarify guidance on the scope of permitted development rights; to make provision about rights and entitlements, including of appeal, for people whose homes are affected by such breaches; to make provision for the inspection and regulation of building under the permitted development regime; to establish financial penalties for developers who breach planning law in certain circumstances; and for connected purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • The United Kingdom's Relations with Russia
    House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee The United Kingdom’s relations with Russia Seventh Report of Session 2016–17 Report, together with formal minutes relating to the report Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 21 February 2017 HC 120 Published on 2 March 2017 by authority of the House of Commons The Foreign Affairs Committee The Foreign Affairs Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and its associated public bodies. Current membership Crispin Blunt MP (Conservative, Reigate) (Chair) Mr John Baron MP (Conservative, Basildon and Billericay) Ann Clwyd MP (Labour, Cynon Valley) Mike Gapes MP (Labour (Co-op), Ilford South) Stephen Gethins MP (Scottish National Party, North East Fife) Mr Mark Hendrick MP (Labour (Co-op), Preston) Adam Holloway MP (Conservative, Gravesham) Daniel Kawczynski MP (Conservative, Shrewsbury and Atcham) Ian Murray MP (Labour, Edinburgh South) Andrew Rosindell MP (Conservative, Romford) Nadhim Zahawi MP (Conservative, Stratford-on-Avon) The following Member was also a member of the Committee during the Parliament: Yasmin Qureshi MP (Labour, Bolton South East) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication Committee reports are published on the Committee’s website at www.parliament.uk/facom and in print by Order of the House. Evidence relating to this report is published on the inquiry page of the Committee’s website.
    [Show full text]
  • Osservatorio 2017
    CENTER FOR ADVANCED MILITARY CENTER DEFENCE STUDIES FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES Osservatorio Strategico 2017 Issue 2 The Military Center for Strategic Studies (Ce.Mi.S.S.) is an Italian Institute founded in 1987 that carries out strategic researches for the Italian Ministry of Defence. It allows the access to knowledge tools and analytical methods that help in tackling current and future scenarios in support of the security and defence needs of the Italian Defence Services and of the national community in general. Its mission is to play effectively an active cultural and scientific role, interacting with the relevant communities in order to shape a positive social environment vis-à-vis with opinion leaders and public opinion. In particular the Center: ● carries out politico-military strategic studies and researches; ● develops the cooperation between the Italian Defence Services, Universities and Research Institutes or Government bodies (National & International); ● trains military and civilian researchers; ● promotes the specialization of young researchers in its areas of interest; ● publishes and circulates the most relevant studies. The Ce.Mi.S.S. carries out its activities availing of civilian and military experts (Italian and foreigner), who enjoy academic freedom in their research. Therefore, views expressed in the content of this volume are solely those of authors and not the position of the Italian MoD. CENTER FOR ADVANCED MILITARY CENTER DEFENCE STUDIES FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES Osservatorio Strategico 2017 Issue 2 Osservatorio Strategico YEAR XIX ISSUE II - 2017 DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this volume are of the Authors; they do not reflect the official opinion of the Italian Ministry of Defence or of the Organizations to which the Authors belong.
    [Show full text]
  • SNP Manifesto 2017
    MANIFESTO 2017 STRONGER FOR SCOTLAND A vote for the SNP on June 8th is a vote for MPs The SNP Government published compromise proposals who will always stand up for Scotland’s best interests. that would keep Scotland in the Single Market. Now, more than ever, with the prospect of a re-elected These proposals were rejected by the UK government, and increasingly hard line Conservative government at but this election offers people the chance to back them and Westminster, it is vital that Scotland’s voice is heard. demand that they become part of the UK’s negotiating remit. A vote for the SNP will strengthen Scotland’s hand against further Tory cuts and ensure that progressive polices, like A vote for the SNP will also strengthen Scotland’s right to those pursued by the SNP government in Scotland, are firmly choose our own future. on the agenda at Westminster. This election won’t decide whether or not Scotland will At the heart of this manifesto is a responsible fiscal plan become independent - but a vote for the SNP will reinforce the to end austerity and free up resources to invest in public right of the Scottish Parliament to decide when a referendum services, protect family budgets and call a halt to cuts should happen. It will make sure that Scotland’s future is in social security support for working families and always in Scotland’s hands. the disabled. My pledge is to make Scotland stronger at Westminster. Tackling rising inequality must be one of the key priorities With your support, we can secure a better future for you, of the next parliament.
    [Show full text]