Sample Manuscript Showing Specifications and Style

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sample Manuscript Showing Specifications and Style F. Cao, F. Guichard, H. Hornung, R. Teissières, An objective protocol for comparing the noise performance of silver halide film and digital sensor, Digital Photography VIII, Electronic Imaging 2012. Copyright 2012 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers. One print or electronic copy may be made for personal use only. Systematic reproduction and distribution, duplication of any material in this paper for a fee or for commercial purposes, or modification of the content of the paper are prohibited. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.910113 An objective protocol for comparing the noise performance of silver halide film and digital sensor Frédéric Cao, Frédéric Guichard, Hervé Hornung, Régis Tessière DxO Labs, 3 Rue Nationale, 92100 Boulogne, France ABSTRACT Digital sensors have obviously invaded the photography mass market. However, some photographers with very high expectancy still use silver halide film. Are they only nostalgic reluctant to technology or is there more than meets the eye? The answer is not so easy if we remark that, at the end of the golden age, films were actually scanned before development. Nowadays film users have adopted digital technology and scan their film to take advantage from digital processing afterwards. Therefore, it is legitimate to evaluate silver halide film “with a digital eye”, with the assumption that processing can be applied as for a digital camera. The article will describe in details the operations we need to consider the film as a RAW digital sensor. In particular, we have to account for the film characteristic curve, the autocorrelation of the noise (related to film grain) and the sampling of the digital sensor (related to Bayer filter array). We also describe the protocol that was set, from shooting to scanning. We then present and interpret the results of sensor response, signal to noise ratio and dynamic range. Keywords: Digital photography, analog versus digital, image quality evaluation, signal to noise ratio, dynamic range, characteristic curve. 1. INTRODUCTION The comparison of the performance of films and digital sensors is an exciting topic, although passionate enough so that truth and facts are not always cleared from speculations. Film industry has designed methods to evaluate the performance of film from an objective point of view1,2,3,4,5 (making measurements in labs) and correlate these metrics with subjective image quality6. Unfortunately, many of these protocols are not relevant for digital images. Instead of trying to apply film evaluation protocols to digital sensors, we chose the reverse approach: since films have gone digital through scanning, we can apply (up to a few modifications) the same protocols as for sensors. This allows a fair comparison with more than 150 DSLR camera sensors tested on a website called www.dxomark.com. We first describe the image quality attributes that are, in our opinion, the most relevant for comparison between film and digital sensors. We shortly describe how they are characterized for films and sensors and explain why the results are not directly comparable. To make the comparison possible, we choose to apply the digital procedure to a digitized (i.e. scanned) film. We describe in details the operations we need to consider the film as a RAW digital sensor. We then present and interpret the results in terms of sensor response, signal to noise ratio and dynamic range. We finally conclude and give some perspectives of other comparisons. 2. EVALUATING IMAGE QUALITY 2.1 Image quality attributes When comparing image quality of films and digital cameras, several topics are usually emphasized: resolution, graininess, tone and color rendering or dynamic range. In this paper, we will only focus on the comparison of graininess and dynamic range. Graininess is the random variation of the photograph of a perfectly homogeneous zone. It can give a special look to picture, but it objectively destroys some part of the signal. Therefore, if the camera is thought of as an instrument to accurately capture a scene, graininess adds some noise to the image, that is, unpredictable variations that can be mistakenly interpreted as a variation of the scene, or can hide some subtle variations of the scene. Dynamic range is the ability of the camera to capture both shadows and highlights on a same picture. Any good photographer knows that backlit scenes should be avoided because the contrast is usually not pleasing to the eye. However, some scenes still contain very luminous and very dark parts in the same time. When the picture is shot, if the shadows are too dark or the highlights are burnt, there is no way to recover the lost information. Digital sensors are traditionally known to have a low dynamic range. Even though very recent cameras show outstanding progress, demanding photographers still complain about the necessary trade-off they sometimes have to make between shadow and highlights. Dynamic range also relates to exposure latitude and this also has a direct impact on image quality. 2.2 Film and sensor characteristics Before going in details on graininess and dynamic range, a preliminary step is necessary to understand the type of response of film and sensors to light. The response of film to light is characterized by the film density at all levels of exposure. The density describes the opacity of the film, and is the logarithm in base 10 of the film absorption (once developed). A high density corresponds to a large opacity, and therefore a very dark film. For a negative film, density is an increasing function of the film exposure (the film becomes darker when exposed to light). For a positive film, density is a decreasing function of the film exposure (the film becomes brighter). In both cases, the characteristic curve has a sigmoid shape. The response varies very slowly for very low light; it becomes larger for mid light; for high light, the film again responds more slowly to a given increase of exposure. A very important fact is that even though the response of the film varies very slowly in highlights, it still does vary, meaning that the film still records some information 3.5 Blue 3 2.5 Green 2 Red 1.5 Optical Density Optical 1 0.5 0 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 Log Exposure (lux.s) Figure 1. Characteristic curves of a film (in this case Kodak Portra 160NC). Note the very slow start in low exposure, the regular slope in the mid-tones, and very slow convergence to a maximal density in the highlights. Remark the scales on both axes are logarithmic. The response of a film is characterized by the curves of the three photosensitive layers (red, green and blue). The sensitivities of the different channels are tuned for a given type illuminant (indoor or outdoor). While the sensitivities of each layer are fixed, the ratio of the sensitivities are tuned for a given type of illuminant (indoor or daylight). For color negative films, the ratios can be adjusted so that a single film can give pleasing results in situations with mixed or multiple illuminants, for example, tungsten and daylight. If we now compare the response of a film with a RAW digital sensor for commercial cameras, we can observe some important differences. First, the response of a digital sensor is essentially linear. (Some sensors for very specific applications do not have a linear response, but they are not used for digital photography.) A given increase in exposure always yields the same increase of response. The second very noticeable difference is the behavior in highlights. At a given exposure, the sensor response suddenly stops increasing, no matter how high the exposure. The saturation is related to the full well capacity of the sensor. Beyond the saturation point, all the information of the scene is lost, except the fact that the exposure exceeds the sensor capacity. Also note that before saturation, a digital sensor can be easily used as an exposure measurement device since the response is linear with respect to exposure. In the shadows, the sensor usually has a positive response to a null input signal (pedestal). 120 100 80 60 40 Sensorresponse (%) 20 0 0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60 0.80 1.00 1.20 Exposure (lux.s) Figure 2. Characteristic curve of a digital sensor. The sensor usually has a non null response even when not exposed (pedestal); then the response increases linearly with the exposure before a sudden saturation corresponding to the pixel full well capacity. 2.3 Different measurements for films and sensors Any measurement is corrupted by noise and this will be the main topic of interest in this article. Photon shot noise is on the luminous signal itself, and therefore independent from the sensing device, film or digital sensor. Moreover, the structure of a film is very locally irregular, since the sensitive surface is made of big aggregates of silver halide crystals, whose size and shape are not perfectly constant. Larger grains are sensitive to lower exposure whereas smaller grains need more light to react. On a digital sensor, photo response of pixels may differ of about 1%. Sensor technologists would say that the photo response non uniformity (PRNU) is much larger on films than on sensors. The granularity of a film can be measured in different ways. A commonly used protocol leads to the RMS (root mean square) granularity8 which is the standard deviation of the density of the film integrated through a hole of 48µm diameter. Some studies in the film industry, at Eastman Kodak in particular, showed that some other metric could be derived, with a very good correlation with subjective image quality, as the Print Grain Index6 (PGI). However, this measurement is really adapted to film grains that are pretty large (typically 15µm).
Recommended publications
  • Xerox Confidentcolor Technology Putting Exacting Control in Your Hands
    Xerox FreeFlow® The future-thinking Print Server ConfidentColor Technology print server. Brochure It anticipates your needs. With the FreeFlow Print Server, you’re positioned to not only better meet your customers’ demands today, but to accommodate whatever applications you need to print tomorrow. Add promotional messages to transactional documents. Consolidate your data center and print shop. Expand your color-critical applications. Move files around the world. It’s an investment that allows you to evolve and grow. PDF/X support for graphic arts Color management for applications. transactional applications. With one button, the FreeFlow Print Server If you’re a transactional printer, this is the assures that a PDF/X file runs as intended. So print server for you. It supports color profiles when a customer embeds color-management in an IPDS data stream with AFP Color settings in a file using Adobe® publishing Management—so you can print color with applications, you can run that file with less time confidence. Images and other content can be in prepress and with consistent color. Files can incorporated from a variety of sources and reliably be sent to multiple locations and multiple appropriately rendered for accurate results. And printers with predictable results. when you’re ready to expand into TransPromo applications, it’s ready, too. Xerox ConfidentColor Technology Find out more Putting exacting control To learn more about the FreeFlow Print Server and ConfidentColor Technology, contact your Xerox sales representative or call 1-800-ASK-XEROX. Or visit us online at www.xerox.com/freeflow. in your hands. © 2009 Xerox Corporation. All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Denver Cmc Photography Section Newsletter
    MARCH 2018 DENVER CMC PHOTOGRAPHY SECTION NEWSLETTER Wednesday, March 14 CONNIE RUDD Photography with a Purpose 2018 Monthly Meetings Steering Committee 2nd Wednesday of the month, 7:00 p.m. Frank Burzynski CMC Liaison AMC, 710 10th St. #200, Golden, CO [email protected] $20 Annual Dues Jao van de Lagemaat Education Coordinator Meeting WEDNESDAY, March 14, 7:00 p.m. [email protected] March Meeting Janice Bennett Newsletter and Communication Join us Wednesday, March 14, Coordinator fom 7:00 to 9:00 p.m. for our meeting. [email protected] Ron Hileman CONNIE RUDD Hike and Event Coordinator [email protected] wil present Photography with a Purpose: Conservation Photography that not only Selma Kristel Presentation Coordinator inspires, but can also tip the balance in favor [email protected] of the protection of public lands. Alex Clymer Social Media Coordinator For our meeting on March 14, each member [email protected] may submit two images fom National Parks Mark Haugen anywhere in the country. Facilities Coordinator [email protected] Please submit images to Janice Bennett, CMC Photo Section Email [email protected] by Tuesday, March 13. [email protected] PAGE 1! DENVER CMC PHOTOGRAPHY SECTION MARCH 2018 JOIN US FOR OUR MEETING WEDNESDAY, March 14 Connie Rudd will present Photography with a Purpose: Conservation Photography that not only inspires, but can also tip the balance in favor of the protection of public lands. Please see the next page for more information about Connie Rudd. For our meeting on March 14, each member may submit two images from National Parks anywhere in the country.
    [Show full text]
  • “Digital Single Lens Reflex”
    PHOTOGRAPHY GENERIC ELECTIVE SEM-II DSLR stands for “Digital Single Lens Reflex”. In simple language, a DSLR is a digital camera that uses a mirror mechanism to either reflect light from a camera lens to an optical viewfinder (which is an eyepiece on the back of the camera that one looks through to see what they are taking a picture of) or let light fully pass onto the image sensor (which captures the image) by moving the mirror out of the way. Although single lens reflex cameras have been available in various shapes and forms since the 19th century with film as the recording medium, the first commercial digital SLR with an image sensor appeared in 1991. Compared to point-and-shoot and phone cameras, DSLR cameras typically use interchangeable lenses. Take a look at the following image of an SLR cross section (image courtesy of Wikipedia): When you look through a DSLR viewfinder / eyepiece on the back of the camera, whatever you see is passed through the lens attached to the camera, which means that you could be looking at exactly what you are going to capture. Light from the scene you are attempting to capture passes through the lens into a reflex mirror (#2) that sits at a 45 degree angle inside the camera chamber, which then forwards the light vertically to an optical element called a “pentaprism” (#7). The pentaprism then converts the vertical light to horizontal by redirecting the light through two separate mirrors, right into the viewfinder (#8). When you take a picture, the reflex mirror (#2) swings upwards, blocking the vertical pathway and letting the light directly through.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Holography Using a Laser Pointer and Consumer Digital Camera Report Date: June 22Nd, 2004
    Digital Holography using a Laser Pointer and Consumer Digital Camera Report date: June 22nd, 2004 by David Garber, M.E. undergraduate, Johns Hopkins University, [email protected] Available online at http://pegasus.me.jhu.edu/~lefd/shc/LPholo/lphindex.htm Acknowledgements Faculty sponsor: Prof. Joseph Katz, [email protected] Project idea and direction: Dr. Edwin Malkiel, [email protected] Digital holography reconstruction: Jian Sheng, [email protected] Abstract The point of this project was to examine the feasibility of low-cost holography. Can viable holograms be recorded using an ordinary diode laser pointer and a consumer digital camera? How much does it cost? What are the major difficulties? I set up an in-line holographic system and recorded both still images and movies using a $600 Fujifilm Finepix S602Z digital camera and a $10 laser pointer by Lazerpro. Reconstruction of the stills shows clearly that successful holograms can be created with a low-cost optical setup. The movies did not reconstruct, due to compression and very low image resolution. Garber 2 Theoretical Background What is a hologram? The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines a hologram as, “a three-dimensional image reproduced from a pattern of interference produced by a split coherent beam of radiation (as a laser).” Holograms can produce a three-dimensional image, but it is more helpful for our purposes to think of a hologram as a photograph that can be refocused at any depth. So while a photograph taken of two people standing far apart would have one in focus and one blurry, a hologram taken of the same scene could be reconstructed to bring either person into focus.
    [Show full text]
  • Completing a Photography Exhibit Data Tag
    Completing a Photography Exhibit Data Tag Current Data Tags are available at: https://unl.box.com/s/1ttnemphrd4szykl5t9xm1ofiezi86js Camera Make & Model: Indicate the brand and model of the camera, such as Google Pixel 2, Nikon Coolpix B500, or Canon EOS Rebel T7. Focus Type: • Fixed Focus means the photographer is not able to adjust the focal point. These cameras tend to have a large depth of field. This might include basic disposable cameras. • Auto Focus means the camera automatically adjusts the optics in the lens to bring the subject into focus. The camera typically selects what to focus on. However, the photographer may also be able to select the focal point using a touch screen for example, but the camera will automatically adjust the lens. This might include digital cameras and mobile device cameras, such as phones and tablets. • Manual Focus allows the photographer to manually adjust and control the lens’ focus by hand, usually by turning the focus ring. Camera Type: Indicate whether the camera is digital or film. (The following Questions are for Unit 2 and 3 exhibitors only.) Did you manually adjust the aperture, shutter speed, or ISO? Indicate whether you adjusted these settings to capture the photo. Note: Regardless of whether or not you adjusted these settings manually, you must still identify the images specific F Stop, Shutter Sped, ISO, and Focal Length settings. “Auto” is not an acceptable answer. Digital cameras automatically record this information for each photo captured. This information, referred to as Metadata, is attached to the image file and goes with it when the image is downloaded to a computer for example.
    [Show full text]
  • Session Outline: History of the Daguerreotype
    Fundamentals of the Conservation of Photographs SESSION: History of the Daguerreotype INSTRUCTOR: Grant B. Romer SESSION OUTLINE ABSTRACT The daguerreotype process evolved out of the collaboration of Louis Jacques Mande Daguerre (1787- 1851) and Nicephore Niepce, which began in 1827. During their experiments to invent a commercially viable system of photography a number of photographic processes were evolved which contributed elements that led to the daguerreotype. Following Niepce’s death in 1833, Daguerre continued experimentation and discovered in 1835 the basic principle of the process. Later, investigation of the process by prominent scientists led to important understandings and improvements. By 1843 the process had reached technical perfection and remained the commercially dominant system of photography in the world until the mid-1850’s. The image quality of the fine daguerreotype set the photographic standard and the photographic industry was established around it. The standardized daguerreotype process after 1843 entailed seven essential steps: plate polishing, sensitization, camera exposure, development, fixation, gilding, and drying. The daguerreotype process is explored more fully in the Technical Note: Daguerreotype. The daguerreotype image is seen as a positive to full effect through a combination of the reflection the plate surface and the scattering of light by the imaging particles. Housings exist in great variety of style, usually following the fashion of miniature portrait presentation. The daguerreotype plate is extremely vulnerable to mechanical damage and the deteriorating influences of atmospheric pollutants. Hence, highly colored and obscuring corrosion films are commonly found on daguerreotypes. Many daguerreotypes have been damaged or destroyed by uninformed attempts to wipe these films away.
    [Show full text]
  • Sample Manuscript Showing Specifications and Style
    Information capacity: a measure of potential image quality of a digital camera Frédéric Cao 1, Frédéric Guichard, Hervé Hornung DxO Labs, 3 rue Nationale, 92100 Boulogne Billancourt, FRANCE ABSTRACT The aim of the paper is to define an objective measurement for evaluating the performance of a digital camera. The challenge is to mix different flaws involving geometry (as distortion or lateral chromatic aberrations), light (as luminance and color shading), or statistical phenomena (as noise). We introduce the concept of information capacity that accounts for all the main defects than can be observed in digital images, and that can be due either to the optics or to the sensor. The information capacity describes the potential of the camera to produce good images. In particular, digital processing can correct some flaws (like distortion). Our definition of information takes possible correction into account and the fact that processing can neither retrieve lost information nor create some. This paper extends some of our previous work where the information capacity was only defined for RAW sensors. The concept is extended for cameras with optical defects as distortion, lateral and longitudinal chromatic aberration or lens shading. Keywords: digital photography, image quality evaluation, optical aberration, information capacity, camera performance database 1. INTRODUCTION The evaluation of a digital camera is a key factor for customers, whether they are vendors or final customers. It relies on many different factors as the presence or not of some functionalities, ergonomic, price, or image quality. Each separate criterion is itself quite complex to evaluate, and depends on many different factors. The case of image quality is a good illustration of this topic.
    [Show full text]
  • Seeing Like Your Camera ○ My List of Specific Videos I Recommend for Homework I.E
    Accessing Lynda.com ● Free to Mason community ● Set your browser to lynda.gmu.edu ○ Log-in using your Mason ID and Password ● Playlists Seeing Like Your Camera ○ My list of specific videos I recommend for homework i.e. pre- and post-session viewing.. PART 2 - FALL 2016 ○ Clicking on the name of the video segment will bring you immediately to Lynda.com (or the login window) Stan Schretter ○ I recommend that you eventually watch the entire video class, since we will only use small segments of each video class [email protected] 1 2 Ways To Take This Course What Creates a Photograph ● Each class will cover on one or two topics in detail ● Light ○ Lynda.com videos cover a lot more material ○ I will email the video playlist and the my charts before each class ● Camera ● My Scale of Value ○ Maximum Benefit: Review Videos Before Class & Attend Lectures ● Composition & Practice after Each Class ○ Less Benefit: Do not look at the Videos; Attend Lectures and ● Camera Setup Practice after Each Class ○ Some Benefit: Look at Videos; Don’t attend Lectures ● Post Processing 3 4 This Course - “The Shot” This Course - “The Shot” ● Camera Setup ○ Exposure ● Light ■ “Proper” Light on the Sensor ■ Depth of Field ■ Stop or Show the Action ● Camera ○ Focus ○ Getting the Color Right ● Composition ■ White Balance ● Composition ● Camera Setup ○ Key Photographic Element(s) ○ Moving The Eye Through The Frame ■ Negative Space ● Post Processing ○ Perspective ○ Story 5 6 Outline of This Class Class Topics PART 1 - Summer 2016 PART 2 - Fall 2016 ● Topic 1 ○ Review of Part 1 ● Increasing Your Vision ● Brief Review of Part 1 ○ Shutter Speed, Aperture, ISO ○ Shutter Speed ● Seeing The Light ○ Composition ○ Aperture ○ Color, dynamic range, ● Topic 2 ○ ISO and White Balance histograms, backlighting, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Aperture, Exposure, and Equivalent Exposure Aperture
    Aperture, Exposure, and Equivalent Exposure Aperture Also known as f-stop Aperture Controls opening’s size during exposure Another term for aperture: f-stop Controls Depth of Field Each full stop on the aperture (f-stop) either doubles or halves the amount of light let into the camera Light is halved this direction Light is doubled this direction The Camera/Eye Comparison Aperture = Camera body = Pupil Shutter = Eyeball Eyelashes Lens Iris diaphragm = Film = Iris Light sensitive retina Aperture and Depth of Field Depth of Field • The zone of sharpness variable by aperture, focal length, or subject distance f/22 f/8 f/4 f/2 Large Depth of Field Shot at f/22 Jacob Blade Shot at f/64 Ansel Adams Shallow Depth of Field Shot at f/4 Keely Nagel Shot at f/5.6 How is a darkroom test strip like a camera’s light meter? They both tell how much light is being allowed into an exposure and help you to pick the correct amount of light using your aperture and proper time (either timer or shutter speed) This is something called Equivalent Exposure Which will be explained now… What we will discuss • Exposure • Equivalent Exposure • Why is equivalent exposure important? Photography – Greek photo = light graphy = writing What is an exposure? Which one is properly exposed and what happened to the others? A B C Under Exposed A Over Exposed B Properly Exposed C Exposure • Combined effect of volume of light hitting the film or sensor and its duration. • Volume is controlled by the aperture (f-stop) • Duration (time) is controlled by the shutter speed Equivalent
    [Show full text]
  • Film Grain, Resolution and Fundamental Film Particles
    FFFiiilllmmm GGGrrraaaiiinnn,,, RRReeesssooollluuutttiiiooonnn aaannnddd FFFuuunnndddaaammmeennntttaaalll FFFiiilllmmm PPPaaarrrtttiiicccllleeesss Version 9 March 2006 Tim Vitale © 2006 use by permission only 1 Introduction 1 2 Fundamental Film Particles – Silver-Halide 0.2 - 2.0 um 3 Feature Size and Digital Resolution: Data Table 1 4 Dye Clouds are the Fundamental Particles Color Film 6 3 Film Grain 6 Dye Clouds are the Film Grain in Color Film 6 Film Grain in Black-and-White Film 7 Cross-Section of Film 9 Grain Size Variability 9 RMS Granularity – Film Image Noise 9 RMS Granularity of Several Films: Data Table 2 10 Film Resolution – Sharpness 10 System Resolving Power Equation 12 Lens Issues Effecting Resolution 12 Film Issues Effecting Resolution 12 Evaluation a System: Camera, Lens and Film 13 Selected Film & Lens Resolution Data: Data Table 3 13 Camera System Resolving Power: Data Table 4 14 Measuring Film Grain 14 Print Grain Index 14 Size of Perceived Film Grain: Example 15 Size Domains for Enlargement & Magnification: Data Table 5 15 Maximum Resolution of a Microscope: Data Table 6 16 4 Eliminating Film Grain from an Image 18 Drum Scan Aperture 18 Feature size vs. Digital Resolution vs. Film: Data Table 7 19 Scan Resolution in Flatbed Scanning 19 Wet Mounting for Film Scanning 20 New Generation of Flatbed Scanners 21 Future Generation of Scanners – Epson Perfection V750-M 23 Software for Diminishing Film Grain 24 1 Introduction The purpose of this complex essay is to demonstrate the following: • Fundamental film particles (silver
    [Show full text]
  • 1.1 Introduction to the Digital Systems
    1.1 Introduction to the digital systems PHO 130 F Digital Photography Prof. Lorenzo Guasti How a DSLR work and why we call a camera “reflex” The heart of all digital cameras is of course the digital imaging sensor. It is the component that converts the light coming from the subject you are photographing into an electronic signal, and ultimately into the digital photograph that you can view or print PHO 130 F Digital Photography Prof. Lorenzo Guasti Although they all perform the same task and operate in broadly the same way, there are in fact th- ree different types of sensor in common use today. The first one is the CCD, or Charge Coupled Device. CCDs have been around since the 1960s, and have become very advanced, however they can be slower to operate than other types of sensor. The main alternative to CCD is the CMOS, or Complimentary Metal-Oxide Semiconductor sen- sor. The main proponent of this technology being Canon, which uses it in its EOS range of digital SLR cameras. CMOS sensors have some of the signal processing transistors mounted alongside the sensor cell, so they operate more quickly and can be cheaper to make. A third but less common type of sensor is the revolutionary Foveon X3, which offers a number of advantages over conventional sensors but is so far only found in Sigma’s range of digital SLRs and its forthcoming DP1 compact camera. I’ll explain the X3 sensor after I’ve explained how the other two types work. PHO 130 F Digital Photography Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • Diy Photography & Jr: Photographic Stickers
    1 DIY PHOTOGRAPHY & JR: PHOTOGRAPHIC STICKERS For grade levels 3-12 Developed by: PEITER GRIGA The world now contains more photographs than bricks, and they are, astonishingly, all different. - John Szarkowski Are images the spine and rib cage of our society or are we so saturated in photography that we forget the underlying messages we ‘read’ from images? Are we protected/ supported by images or flooded by them? JR’s work elaborates on the idea of how we value images by demonstrating our likenesses and differences. This dichotomy is so great in his work; JR can eliminate himself as the artist, becoming the egoless ‘guide.’ As part of his Inside Out Project he allows people from all around the world to send him pictures they take of themselves, which he then prints out a poster sized image and returns to the image maker, who then selects a location and hangs the work in a public space. In a traditional sense, he hands the artistic power over to the participant and only controls the printing and specs for the images. The CAC participated in the Inside Out Project as early as 2011, but most recently through installations in Fountain Square, Rabbit Hash, KY, Findlay Market, and inside the CAC Lobby. The power of the image and the location of the image are vital aspects of JR’s site-specific work. Building upon these two factors is the material used to place the image in the public space. His materials usually include wheat paste, paper, and a large scale digitally printed image.
    [Show full text]