DOCSLIB.ORG

CYPRUS – Renewable Energy Fact Sheet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CYPRUS – Renewable Energy Fact Sheet CYPRUS – Renewable Energy Fact Sheet Policy Background A European energy policy must pursue the objective of a sustainable, competitive and secure supply of energy. If the EU continues on its present course, this key objective will not be attained. In January 2007, the European Commission adopted an energy policy for Europe. This was supported by several documents on different aspects of energy and included an action plan to meet the major energy challenges Europe faces. Each European citizen must be informed of these challenges and the role they should play in meeting them. Renewable energies help combat climate change while increasing security of supply. Key Issues In Cyprus, an issue regarding policy integration has been observed, since investments in a new fossil fuel power plant creating excess capacity are under way. Until 2005, measures that proactively supported renewable energy production, such as the New Grant Scheme, were not very ambitious. In Cyprus, targets are not being met. In 2006, a New Enhanced Grant Scheme has been agreed on. The leading RES in Cyprus is PV; wind power has a high potential. Current national RES target The Action Plan for the Promotion of RES determines that the contribution of RES to the total energy consumption of Cyprus should rise from 4.5% in 1995 to 9% in 2010. The RES-E target to be achieved in 2010 from the EU Directive is 6%. As an indicative target, 1% biofuel by energy content in 2005 has been set. Progress towards meeting national targets In Cyprus, the RES share of total energy consumption has decreased from 4.5% in 1995 to 4% in 2002. The target for biofuels of 1% by the end of 2005 was not met. The use of biofuels in Cyprus was still at zero percent in 2005. Main supporting policies RES-E policy in Cyprus is made up of the following components: o New Grant Scheme, valid from 2004 until 2006. A tax of 0.22 €ct/kWh on every category of electricity consumption is in place. The income generated by this tax is used for the promotion of RES. o The New Enhanced Grant Scheme was installed in January 2006. Financial incentives (30-55% of investments) in the form of government grants and feed-in tariffs are part of this scheme. o Operation state aid for supporting electricity produced by biomass has been suggested, and forwarded to the Commission for approval. In order to promote the use of biofuels, a measure has been taken to exempt the biomass percentage of biodiesel from excise duty (as of 2005). The New Enhanced Grant Scheme for Energy Conservation and Promotion of the Use of RES (2006) also provides financial incentives for RES heating and cooling activities. 30-45% of investment in solar systems for central water heating systems, and 40-55% of investment in space heating and cooling can be recovered in this way. Key renewable energy statistics Electricity from RES : In absolute figures, the amount of electricity generated from renewable energy in Cyprus is negligible (0.27 GWh in 2004). The only source of RES-E currently in place is solar photovoltaics. Installed capacity for PV stood at 0.63 MWp at the end of 2005. This is almost twice the installed PV capacity present at the end of 2004. With 0.81 Wp installed per head of population, Cyprus ranks the 6th highest in the EU per capita. January 2007 Page 1 of 3 CYPRUS – Renewable Energy Fact Sheet Electricity generation from renewable energy sources by type (GWh) 5 Biogas Solid biomass Biowaste Geothermal Hydro small-scale Hydro large-scale PV Wind onshore Wind offshore 4 3 2 Electricitygeneration [GWh/year] 1 0 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Source: European Commission http://ec.europa.eu/energy/res/legislation/share_res_eu_en.htm Biofuels : Biodiesel production capacity in Cyprus stood at 2 kt per year in 2005, with a production level of 1 ktoe annually. Since 2005, there have been no capacity developments. There is currently no bioethanol production. Heating and cooling : In Cyprus, the main source of RES-H is solar thermal. With 20 ktoe in 2004, it dominates the market. Biomass heat has shown a decrease since 1997 and has gone from 9 ktoe in 1997 to almost nothing in 2004. At the moment, there is currently no geothermal heat production in Cyprus. Penetration 1997 Penetration 2004 Av. Annual (ktoe) (ktoe) growth [%] Biomass heat 9 0 -100% Solar thermal heat 16 20 4% Geothermal heat incl. heat pumps 0 0 - Source: European Commission http://ec.europa.eu/energy/res/legislation/share_res_eu_en.htm For further information To find out more about renewables, go to: http://ec.europa.eu/energy/res/index_en.htm http://ec.europa.eu/energy/intelligent/index_en.html To find out more about the current situation of renewables in the Member States, go to http://ec.europa.eu/energy/res/legislation/electricity_member_states_en.htm http://ec.europa.eu/energy/res/legislation/share_res_eu_en.htm To find out more about support measures, go to http://ec.europa.eu/energy/res/legislation/support_electricity_en.htm To find out about a project or contact an energy agency in your region, go to http://www.managenergy.net/emap/maphome.html Further fact sheets on Cyprus and other Member States can be found on: http://ec.europa.eu/energy/energy_policy/facts_en.htm What is meant by…..? RES: Renewable energy sources RES-E: Electricity production from renewable energy sources January 2007 Page 2 of 3 CYPRUS – Renewable Energy Fact Sheet RES-H: Production of heat and cold from renewable energy sources Biofuels : Mainly includes biodiesel and bioethanol Biomass : Includes solid biomass, biowaste and biogas CHP : Combined Heat and Power GWh: gigawatt-hour H&C : Heating and Cooling KWh : kilowatt-hour ktoe : Thousand tonnes of oil equivalent MWp: peak megawatt PV : Photo-voltaic technology for the production of electricity from solar energy Wp: peak watt Disclaimer Views expressed in this document have not been adopted or in any way approved by the European Commission and should not be relied upon as a statement of the Commission’s views. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this document, nor does it accept responsibility for any use made thereof. January 2007 Page 3 of 3 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Successful Experience of Renewable Energy Development in Several Offshore Islands
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Energy Procedia 100 ( 2016 ) 8 – 13 3rd International Conference on Power and Energy Systems Engineering, CPESE 2016, 8-12 September 2016, Kitakyushu, Japan Successful experience of renewable energy development in several offshore islands Jhih-Hao Lina, Yuan-Kang Wub*, Huei-Jeng Lina aDepartment of Engineering Science and Ocean Engineering, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei 10617, Taiwan bDepartment of Electrical Engineering, National Chung Cheng University, No.168, Sec. 1, University Rd., Chiayi 62102, Taiwan Abstract Islands incur more difficult and expensive energy supplies; many offshore islands, therefore, develop renewable energy to supply energy and reduce CO2 emissions. However, most of renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar, are intermittent and variable sources of power. To overcome the integration problems, numerous islands have utilized several useful methods. For instance, the island of Gran Canaria applied the pumped storage systems to reutilize energy, and the island of Lolland developed renewable hydrogen community. The operation experience of these islands is extremely worthy to appreciate. This article introduces eight offshore islands and discusses about their present situations, policies, successful experience and challenges about renewable energy development. Those islands include Samso, Reunion, Cyprus, Crete, King Island, Agios Efstratios, Utsira and El Hierro. The successful experience on those islands can provide useful information for other islands for developing renewable energy. ©© 20162016 The The Authors. Authors. Published Published by Elsevierby Elsevier Ltd. LtdThis. is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (Peer-http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/review under responsibility of the organizing).
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy in Small Islands
    Renewable Energy on Small Islands Second edition august 2000 Sponsored by: Renewable Energy on Small Islands Second Edition Author: Thomas Lynge Jensen, Forum for Energy and Development (FED) Layout: GrafiCO/Ole Jensen, +45 35 36 29 43 Cover photos: Upper left: A 55 kW wind turbine of the Danish island of Aeroe. Photo provided by Aeroe Energy and Environmental Office. Middle left: Solar water heaters on the Danish island of Aeroe. Photo provided by Aeroe Energy and Environmental Office. Upper right: Photovoltaic installation on Marie Galante Island, Guadeloupe, French West Indies. Photo provided by ADEME Guadeloupe. Middle right: Waiah hydropower plant on Hawaii-island. Photo provided by Energy, Resource & Technology Division, State of Hawaii, USA Lower right: Four 60 kW VERGNET wind turbines on Marie Galante Island, Guadeloupe, French West Indies. Photo provided by ADEME Guadeloupe. Printing: Vesterkopi Printing cover; Green Graphic No. printed: 200 ISBN: 87-90502-03-5 Copyright (c) 2000 by Forum for Energy and Development (FED) Feel free to use the information in the report, but please state the source. Renewable Energy on Small Islands – Second Edition August 2000 Table of Contents Table of Contents Foreword and Acknowledgements by the Author i Introduction iii Executive Summary v 1. The North Atlantic Ocean Azores (Portugal) 1 Canary Island (Spain) 5 Cape Verde 9 Faeroe Islands (Denmark) 11 Madeira (Portugal) 13 Pellworm (Germany) 17 St. Pierre and Miquelon (France) 19 2. The South Atlantic Ocean Ascension Island (UK) 21 St. Helena Island (UK) 23 3. The Baltic Sea Aeroe (Denmark) 25 Gotland (Sweden) 31 Samsoe (Denmark) 35 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Feedback Loop Report
    FEEDBACK LOOP REPORT Progress in energy efficiency policies in the EU Member States Findings from the Energy Efficiency Watch 3 Project 2016 Stefan Thomas, Felix Suerkemper, Thomas Adisorn, Dorothea Hauptstock, Carolin Schäfer-Sparenberg, Lena Tholen, Florin Vondung (Wuppertal Institut) Daniel Becker, Lucie Tesniere, Sonja Förster (Ecofys) Christiane Egger (OÖ Energiesparverband) Jan Geiss, Roxane Roth, Lucia Bayer (Eufores) Peter Schilken, Kristina Dely (Energy Cities) Dominique Bourges (Fedarene) Nils Borg (eceee) Energy Efficiency Watch 3 – Feedback Loop Report Disclaimer: The sole responsibility for the content of this publication lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union. Neither the EASME nor the European Commission are responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. Energy Efficiency Watch 3 – Feedback Loop Report ii Executive Summary The core objective of Energy Efficiency Watch 3 (EEW3) is to establish a constant feedback loop on the implementation of European and national energy efficiency policies and thus enable both compliance monitoring and mutual learning on effective policy making across the EU. The project team applied a mixed-method approach to assess energy efficiency policy developments in EU Member States. EEW3 analysed the progress made in the implementation of energy efficiency policies in European Member States since the publication of the second National Energy Efficiency Action Plans (NEEAPs) in 2011 by screening official documents, sought experts’ knowledge via an EU-wide survey and has been creating new consultation platforms with a wide spectrum of stakeholders including parliamentarians, regions, cities and business stakeholders. Results are presented in Country Reports for each of the 28 Member States, the Expert Survey Report, 10 Case Studies presenting outstanding energy efficiency policies in Europe, the Key Policy Conclusions, the project summary report in brochure format and this Feedback Loop Report, which summarises the overall EEW3 portfolio.
    [Show full text]
  • Enerdata Renewable Energy Support Policies in Europe
    Renewable Energy Support Policies Renewable Energy Support Policies in Europe September 2020 2 Enerdata Renewable Energy Support Policies in Europe Table of contents Table of contents 2 List of figures 7 List of tables 8 Definitions 12 Acronyms 15 Overview 16 Main changes since the last version 19 Austria 19 Croatia 19 Czechia 19 Estonia 19 Greece 19 Hungary 19 Italy 19 Ireland 19 Lithuania 20 Luxembourg 20 Netherlands 20 Poland 20 Portugal 20 Romania 20 Slovakia 20 Spain 20 Ukraine 21 United Kingdom 21 Austria 22 Policies overview 22 Feed-in Tariffs 22 Combined Heat and Power (CHP) 24 Investment grants 24 Biofuels 24 Belgium 25 Policies overview 25 Renewable Obligations 25 Premium 28 Investment grants 29 Net metering 29 Bulgaria 30 Policies overview 30 Feed-in Tariffs 30 Biofuels 31 Croatia 32 Enerdata 2 Policies overview 32 Feed-in Tariffs 32 Biofuels 33 Cyprus 34 Policies overview 34 Net metering 34 Investment grants 34 Feed-in Tariffs 34 Biofuels 35 Czechia 36 Policies overview 36 Feed-in Tariffs/Premiums 36 Investment grants 36 Biofuels 37 Denmark 38 Policies overview 38 Premiums 38 Net metering 40 Biofuels 40 Estonia 41 Policies overview 41 Premiums 41 Investment grants 42 Finland 43 Policies overview 43 Premiums 43 France 45 Policies overview 45 Feed-in Tariffs 45 Combined Heat and Power (CHP) 48 Biofuels 48 Germany 49 Policies overview 49 Feed-in Tariffs 49 Biofuels 52 Greece 53 Policies overview 53 Feed-in Tariffs 53 Net Metering 56 Hungary 57 Renewable Energy Support Policies in Europe - Copyright© Enerdata – All rights reserved
    [Show full text]
  • Cyprus' Energy Systems & Pathways to 2020 and 2025
    Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Cyprus’ Energy Systems & Pathways to 2020 and 2025 Author: Alexandros Aristotelous Supervisor: Mr Cameron Johnstone A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment for the requirement of the degree Master of Science Sustainable Engineering: Renewable Energy Systems and the Environment 2018 Copyright Declaration This thesis is the result of the author’s original research. It has been composed by the author and has not been previously submitted for examination which has led to the award of a degree. The copyright of this thesis belongs to the author under the terms of the United Kingdom Copyright Acts as qualified by University of Strathclyde Regulation 3.50. Due acknowledgement must always be made of the use of any material contained in, or derived from, this thesis. Signed: Date: Friday, 24 August 2018 Abstract The Republic of Cyprus, an isolated energy system, generated approximately 5TWh of electricity in 2017, 91.6% of which was generated from oil-fired turbines, the large majority of which utilising heavy fuel oil. The National Energy Strategy (NES) of Cyprus, with which the country aims to meet its EU-2020 targets, compares the increase of renewables to a forecasted demand that is no longer binding; being recently invalidated with new forecasts showing an increase by at least 10% from the Transmission System Operator. The updated forecasts are corrected, and a scenario is developed and modelled using the renewable capacity desired by the national strategy. This study presents a holistic analysis of the energy systems, highlighting the concerns of relying exclusively on oil-fired turbines, with negative implications on all three elements of the energy trilemma.
    [Show full text]
  • European Climate and Energy Experts
    Journalism for the energy transition EXPERT EUROPEAN CLIMATE AND ENERGY EXPERTS Filters: Expert Type: Any, Topic: Wind, Location: Any Promotes the utilisation of renewable energy from wind in Norway since 2006. Twitter: @norwea Location: Norway PRESS CONTACT Øistein Schmidt Galaaen, CEO [email protected] +47 91844489 Unites and represents companies active in the wind energy sector. Twitter: @Tuuleenergia Location: Estonia PRESS CONTACT Terje Talv, CEO [email protected] +372 5063583 Lobbies for the establishment of legal frameworks allowing for the development and operation of renewable energy sources, in particular wind energy, in Poland. Twitter: @PSEW_PWEA Location: Poland PRESS CONTACT Aneta Wieczerzak-Krusińska, media coordinator [email protected] +48 508848956 Association of private businesses that have invested in wind energy in Cyprus. Location: Cyprus PRESS CONTACT Office [email protected] +357 99435654 Brings together wind energy producers and experts. Represents the interests of the wind energy sector in Greek and European institutions. Twitter: @HWEA_ELETAEN Location: Greece PRESS CONTACT Office [email protected] +30 210 8081755 Č Supports the installation and use of wind power. Twitter: @s_chalupa Location: Czech Republic PRESS CONTACT Martin Mikeska, media officer [email protected] +420 603780670 Wind energy researcher. Email: [email protected] Phone: +356 23402870 Location: Malta Scientist specialising in energy management systems, wind and PV energy. Email: [email protected] Phone: +356 23402435 Location: Malta Scientist specialising in power grids and wind energy. Email: [email protected] Phone: +356 23403650 Location: Malta Scientist specialising in renewable energy, including wind and solar. Email: [email protected] Phone: +356 23407835 Location: Malta The VSB Group, headquartered in Dresden, Germany, offers complete and innovative solutions in the renewable energy market.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyprus Energy Regulatory Authority (CERA)
    ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2007 The Cyprus Energy Regulatory Authority (CERA) was established by virtue of the Law of 2003 On Regulating the Electricity Market, L.122(I)/2003, which was enacted by the House of Representatives on the 25th of July 2003. The Members of CERA were appointed on the 21st of January 2004 and assumed their duties on the 4th of February 2004 after giving the prescribed affirmation for the faithful execution of their duties to the President of the Republic of Cyprus. The present Annual Report on CERA’s proceedings covers the period from the 1st of January 2007 to and including the 31st of December 2007, and is the fourth one to be issued. By virtue of the provisions of the above Law and in particular of Article 18, CERA submits to the President of the Republic of Cyprus an Annual Report on its Activities by the end of March every year, and provides copies of the Report to the Council of Ministers and the House of Representatives. The Annual Report of the CYPRUS ENERGY REGULATORY AUTHORITY also incorporates the Report on the Activities of the Transmission System Operator (TSO) as provided by the Law L.122(l)/2003 (Article 61). 1 CONTENTS PAGE Introduction 03 The establishment of CERA and its role in the Energy market 07 Natural Gas 13 Electricity 18 Regulatory Decisions 28 The 3rd Energy Package of Europe 37 Established European Bodies for Energy Issues 41 CERA’s Activities 44 International Activities 49 Applications for securing Licences 61 European Directives and Legislative Regulation 81 Financial Statements.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Savings Potential in Cyprus Subsectors: Floriculture and Vegetables in Greenhouses
    Final Report Energy Savings Potential in Cyprus Subsectors: Floriculture and vegetables in greenhouses The Cyprus energy profile for the greenhouses sector: current situation and energy saving measures in combination with RES Deliverable 3.1 Submitted to: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH Submitted by: WIP GmbH & Co Planungs KG Sylvensteinstr. 2 D-81369 Muenchen Germany Tel: +49-89-720127 43 Fax: +49-89-720127 91 [email protected] www.wip-munich.de 28 February 2017 Energy Savings Potential in Cyprus Floriculture, vegetables in greenhouses Acknowledgments & Disclaimer This study has been conducted within the framework of the project “Technical assistance for energy efficiency and sustainable transport in Cyprus” implemented by Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH with financing from the European Commission Structural Reform Support Services under Contract No. SRSS/S2016/S002 and the German Ministry of Economy and Energy. Neither GIZ nor the European Commission or German Federal Ministry of Economy and Energy or any person acting on their behalf is responsible for the use which might be made of the following information. The views expressed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the European Commission, the German Government or GIZ. Authors Essam Mohamed, George Markou, Thanos Balafoutis, George Papadakis (Agricultural University of Athens), Pavlos Michael (Energy Auditor), Rainer Janssen (WIP) February
    [Show full text]
  • An Empirical Analysis of Electricity Consumption in Cyprus
    DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMICS UNIVERSITY OF CYPRUS An Empirical Analysis of Electricity Consumption in Cyprus Theodoros Zachariadis and Nicoletta Pashourtidou Discussion Paper 2006-04 P.O. Box 20537, 1678 Nicosia, CYPRUS Tel.: ++357-2-892430, Fax: ++357-2-892432 Web site: http://www.econ.ucy.ac.cy An empirical analysis of electricity consumption in Cyprus* Theodoros Zachariadis and Nicoletta Pashourtidou Economics Research Centre, University of Cyprus April 2006 ABSTRACT The paper presents the first empirical analysis of electricity consumption in Cyprus. Using annual data from 1960 to 2004, we have examined electricity use in the residential and the services sectors, which are the fastest-growing electricity consumers in the island, and its interaction with income, prices and the weather. The analysis was performed with the aid of time series analysis techniques such as unit root tests with and without a structural break in levels, cointegration tests, Vector Error Correction models, Granger causality tests and impulse response functions. Results show long-term elasticities of electricity use above unity for income, and of the order of –0.3 to –0.4 for prices. In the short term electricity consumption is rather inelastic, mostly affected by weather fluctuations. Granger causality tests confirm exogeneity of electricity prices and bidirectional causality between residential electricity consumption and private income. The commercial sector is less elastic and reverts faster to equilibrium than the residential sector. Despite the relatively small sample size, results reported here are quite robust and can be used for forecasts and policy analyses. Keywords: unit root; structural break; cointegration; Granger causality, impulse response JEL classification: Q41; Q43; C32 * The first author has conducted most of his part of the research in the framework of a Marie Curie Fellowship that he has received from the European Community within its Sixth Framework Programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Gesamtdokument Final
    EU-25/27 Watch No. 4 ISSN 1610-6458 Issued in January 2007 Edited by the Institut für Europäische Politik, Berlin in collaboration with the Austrian Institute of International Affairs, Vienna Groupe d’Etudes Politiques Européennes, Brussels Bulgarian European Community Studies Institute for International Relations, Zagreb Association, Sofia Institute for World Economics of the Hungarian Center for European Studies / Middle East Technical Academy of Sciences, Budapest University, Ankara Institute for Strategic and International Studies, Centre européen de Sciences Po, Paris Lisbon Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches Européennes Institute of European Affairs, Dublin Robert Schuman, Luxembourg Institute of International Relations, Prague Centre of International Relations, Ljubljana Institute of International Relations and Political Cyprus Institute for Mediterranean, European and Science, Vilnius University International Studies, Nicosia Istituto Affari Internazionali, Rome Danish Institute for International Studies, Latvian Institute of International Affairs, Copenhagen Riga Elcano Royal Institute and UNED University, Madrid Mediterranean Academy of Diplomatic Studies, University of Tartu University of Malta European Institute of Romania, Bucharest Netherlands Institute of International Relations Federal Trust for Education and Research, London ‘Clingendael’, The Hague Finnish Institute of International Affairs, Helsinki Slovak Foreign Policy Association, Bratislava Foundation for European Studies, European Institute, Swedish Institute of
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Utilization of Geothermal Energy 2020 Worldwide Review
    Proceedings World Geothermal Congress 2020 Reykjavik, Iceland, April 26 – May 2, 2020 Direct Utilization of Geothermal Energy 2020 Worldwide Review John W. Lund1 and Aniko N. Toth2 1Geo-Heat Center, Oregon Institute of Technology, Klamath Falls Oregon, USA 2Ana-Geo Ltd., Miskolc, Hungary [email protected], [email protected] Keywords: Geothermal, direct-use, spas, balneology, space heating, district heating, aquaculture, greenhouses, ground-source heat pumps, industrial application, snow melting, energy savings, wells, drilled, manpower, investment ABSTRACT This paper presents a review of the worldwide applications of geothermal energy for direct utilization and updates the previous survey carried out in 2015. We also compare data from WGC1995, WGC2000, WGC2005, WGC2010, and WGC2015 presented at World Geothermal Congresses in Italy, Japan, Turkey, Indonesia and Australia. As in previous reports, an effort is made to quantify geothermal (ground-source) heat pump data. The present report is based on country update papers received from 62 countries and regions reporting on their direct utilization of geothermal energy. Twenty-six additional countries were added to the list based on other sources of information. Thus, direct utilization of geothermal energy in a total of 88 countries is an increase from 82 in 2015, 78 reported in 2010, 72 reported in 2005, 58 reported in 2000, and 28 reported in 1995. An estimation of the installed thermal power for direct utilization at the end of 2019 is used in this paper and equals 107,727 MWt, a 52.0% increase over the 2015 data, growing at a compound rate of 8.73% annually. The thermal energy used is 1,020,887 TJ/yr (283,580 GWh/yr.), a 72.3% increase over 2015, growing at a compound rate of 11.5% annually.
    [Show full text]
  • Editor's Note
    10th anniversary FES CYPRUS NEWSLETTER EDITOR‘S NOTE The Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung in Cyprus cele- brates its 10th anniversary. To mark the oc- casion the FES newsletter has a new design and we hope you share our excitement over the new look. We hope that the pandemic will allow for an appropriate celebration later this year. In the meantime, we wish you good health and hope you enjoy our “new” newsletter. Newsletter No. 106 MARCH 21 please Follow and visit us on: Twitter I Facebook I Instagram I Online 10th anniversary FES CYPRUS NEWSLETTER CONTENT EVENTS, PODCASTS, PUBLICATIONS 3 CYPRUS PROBLEM 4 HYDROCARBONS 6 GREEK CYPRIOTS 7 Economic Developments Domestic Developments Labour Relations and Trade Unions TURKISH CYPRIOTS 10 Economic Developments Relations with Turkey Domestic Developments Labour Relations and Trade Unions Newsletter No.106 MARCH 21 please Follow and visit us on: Twitter I Facebook I Instagram I Online 2 10th anniversary FES CYPRUS NEWSLETTER PODCASTS in APRIL: PODCASTS in MAY: Hubert Faustmann and Sertac Sonan Hubert Faustmann and Sertac Sonan Politics and Society in North Cyprus - Fighting Mis- Austerity Policies in North Cyprus leading Generalisation (In English) (In English) Hrishab Sandilya, Sarah Morsheimer and Kyriaki Chatzi- panagiotou (Project Phoenix) Migration 2.0 Podcast - Episode 2: The Impact of COVID-19 on Migrants and International Students in the North of Cyprus (In English) Hubert Faustmann and Mete Hatay Varosha: Between Human Rights and Realpolitik (In English) PUBLICATIONS in MAY: Corina Demetriou
    [Show full text]