Newsletter 2021 March
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Pollinator Planting Card
Planting Guide for your native pollinator garden TEXAS Use the arrangement below to have a continuous garden - spring, summer, & fall 6’ tropical sage Cobaea beardtongue flame acanthus HARRY CLIFFE SANDY SMITH JOSEPH MARCUS 3’ shrubby boneset STEPHANIE BRUNDAGE Maximilian sunflower RW SMITH Texas lantana LISA HENRY green milkweed mealy blue sage columbine ALAN CRESSLER SALLY WASOWSKI STEVEN FAUCETTE BLOOM SEASON For best Spring results, use Summer multiple plants Fall of each species. Follow these steps to create your beautiful native pollinator garden TEXAS 1 Identify your garden spot: BLOOM SEASON NATIVE PLANT OPTIONS Find a 3’ x 6’ plot that gets 6+ hours of sun. *Your state’s native plant society can recommend additional locally Have a larger area? Include more choices and clump the same appropriate native species in the genus below. See North American Pollinator Protection Campaign Ecoregional Planting Guides for species together. additional information: www.pollinator.org/guides. Remove or smother existing lawn or vegetation. FIRST OPTION SECOND OPTION Enhance hard-packed soil with organic compost. SEASON Spring green milkweed antelope-horns 2 Buy plants at a local native plant nursery, if possible. Asclepias viridis Asclepias asperula cobaea beardtongue Barbara’s buttons 3 Plant! Penstemon cobaea Marshallia caespitosa columbine engelmann daisy Arrange plants with different seasonal blooms in your plot. COBAEA Aquilegia canadensis Engelmannia pinnatifida Dig holes twice as large as each plant’s pot. BEARDTONGUE Summer Texas lantana orange zexmenia Remove the plant from the pot, loosen the roots, place it in Lantana urticoides Wedelia acapulcensis the hole, backfill, tamp soil, and water. tropical Sage Turk’s cap Mulch plot to depth < 1 inch, keeping mulch away from Salvia coccinea Malvaviscus arboreus stems and avoid using hardwood chips and shreds. -
A Palynological Investigation of Louisiana Honeys. Meredith Elizabeth Hoag Lieux Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1969 A Palynological Investigation of Louisiana Honeys. Meredith Elizabeth hoag Lieux Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Lieux, Meredith Elizabeth hoag, "A Palynological Investigation of Louisiana Honeys." (1969). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 1675. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/1675 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been microfilmed exactly as received 70-9075 LIEUX, Meredith Elizabeth Hoag, 1939- A PALYNOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF LOUISIANA HONEYS. The Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, Ph.D., 1969 Botany University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan (c) Meredith Elizabeth Hoag Lieux 1970. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED A PALYNOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION OF LOUISIANA HONEYS A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Botany and Plant Pathology by Meredith Elizabeth Hoag Lieux B.S., Louisiana State University,.1960 M.S., University of Mississippi, 1964 August, 1969 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Sincere appreciation is expressed to Dr. Clair A. Brown for his assistance and guidance throughout this study. I especially wish to recognize and again thank him for his work on the photographs used in m y manuscript and for the reference pollen that he made available to me. -
New Hawaiian Plant Records from Herbarium Pacificum for 20081
Records of the Hawaii Biological Survey for 2008. Edited by Neal L. Evenhuis & Lucius G. Eldredge. Bishop Museum Occasional Papers 107: 19–26 (2010) New Hawaiian plant records from Herbarium Pacificum for 2008 1 BARBARA H. K ENNEDY , S HELLEY A. J AMES , & CLYDE T. I MADA (Hawaii Biological Survey, Bishop Museum, 1525 Bernice St, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-2704, USA; emails: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]) These previously unpublished Hawaiian plant records report 2 new naturalized records, 13 new island records, 1 adventive species showing signs of naturalization, and nomen - clatural changes affecting the flora of Hawai‘i. All identifications were made by the authors, except where noted in the acknowledgments, and all supporting voucher speci - mens are on deposit at BISH. Apocynaceae Rauvolfia vomitoria Afzel. New naturalized record The following report is paraphrased from Melora K. Purell, Coordinator of the Kohala Watershed Partnership on the Big Island, who sent an email alert to the conservation com - munity in August 2008 reporting on the incipient outbreak of R. vomitoria, poison devil’s- pepper or swizzle stick, on 800–1200 ha (2000–3000 acres) in North Kohala, Hawai‘i Island. First noticed by field workers in North Kohala about ten years ago, swizzle stick has become a growing concern within the past year, as the tree has spread rapidly and invaded pastures, gulches, and closed-canopy alien and mixed alien-‘ōhi‘a forest in North Kohala, where it grows under the canopies of eucalyptus, strawberry guava, common guava, kukui, albizia, and ‘ōhi‘a. The current distribution is from 180–490 m (600–1600 ft) elevation, from Makapala to ‘Iole. -
BUSH FRUITS in the Home Garden
Extension Bulletin 323 July, 1951 how to grow in the home garden By Vernon Patterson, Extension Horticulturist Agricultural Extension Service The Ohio State University PLUM SOUR 16' 22' CHERRY 2?.' 16' x x ~ONT MORENCY ST+HJl.EY \...~ C ......----.---....--..........__-_____ __,..________ ---~ lC,l(A1ll#Xltlillllil11;Jr,Jll(ll •JfAll.lallllL ___.__...--.._...____~_.,..__,,,....._......__...__ ____ ___............~......__...._..- / L.f\THAM RED R.fl5f'Bl:RRlfS _/ ~~~~---,---......__.,.-..---...,,------:'\ L!--!-~~:__~~..:.-:....-:--~~~~_:..~~_:) .fl R€..fi I -AREA Il c: --~--~-~~~----.,,.... .__,,, . .__.._..__ . ') _ ________ ,...~ ~ .......----- ) Us£ Vt::GfTilBLes c~----~~--~--"""'. .. :___. _) · OR __..--~--_____....._ __ CULTIV-ATfD CROPS HfRr FIRST YE~R IN L+lTER Y:f:-ARS ROT-AT-E: NEW STR-BWSERRY Pl.-ANTINGS ____,...__..,_.._.. BE:TWEJ:N -AREAS I AND II c:---------------------3_________. .. .. " .. C------~------..: .....:.. .:__:_:_:.....:.....:_:_:......:.. :_ =-..:....:..:....:_ .:.,:... :_ "_/....... c=-----------.J-,.------------........ • .. • • # • • • • • .. .. • • • • • .) C __.......--• • • • • • ......__...• ---------....• • ________• • • • • • • • .. • • ...,,).. l s· I. ~ooor~c,r~)oroor)o()--! .__,.) B 6 v C l._._,) c C ~ G ._/ \CORTLAND l' \JoNATtlAN j "-sTAYMAN WINrSAP / ~· ~or~J[)r~or~c)OOC~~r:w: /\.,...... ) 6 "-._,../ 6 "-,_) C \.,__ , C~ C .../ G __/ 'ff:Ll.OW TR4N5PARENT 1 '-wt:~L.T+IY./ GOLDEN 0£LIC10U5 f 8• $Ive.berries C• C1.1rranfs e = Goosebernes Plan for a home fruit garden, using dwarf apples. Seale: 1/16" = 1' 2 howtogrow BUSH FRUITS in the home garden OST bush fruits and brambles can be grown successfully in Ohio M home gardens. Red, black, and purple raspberries, blackberries, gooseberries, and currants are fairly easy to grow, but dewberries, youngberries, loganberries, and boysenberries are not well adapted to Ohio conditions and need protection against cold winter weather. -
EAHCP 2019 Annual Report
Edwards Aquifer Habitat Conservation Plan 2019 Annual Report Prepared for The U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service On behalf of The Edwards Aquifer Habitat Conservation Plan and Permittees Prepared by Blanton & Associates, Inc. March 27, 2020 EDWARDS AQUIFER HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN 2019 ANNUAL REPORT PAGE i THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK EDWARDS AQUIFER HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN 2019 ANNUAL REPORT PAGE ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Edwards Aquifer Habitat Conservation Plan The Edwards Aquifer Habitat Conservation Plan (EAHCP) is the primary document that establishes the cooperative effort to protect the water of the Southern Segment of the Edwards Aquifer (“Edwards” or “Aquifer”) both for people in the region and the threatened and endangered species that inhabit the Aquifer, and aquatic spring environments whose water largely emanates from the Aquifer. This effort began when regional stakeholders and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) initiated the Edwards Aquifer Recovery Implementation Program (EARIP) in 2006. The Texas Legislature mandated participation in the process by the Edwards Aquifer Authority (EAA), Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Texas Department of Agriculture, Texas Parks & Wildlife Department (TPWD), and Texas Water Development Board (TWDB). The EARIP planning group led to the creation of the process known as the EAHCP Program, which has now been fully transitioned from the EARIP. The EAHCP was completed in November 2012 and led to the approval of an Incidental Take Permit (ITP) under the federal Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) issued in February 2013 by the USFWS to be effective in March 2013. The ITP has been amended once. This Annual Report has been prepared for submittal to the USFWS, as required by the ITP. -
List of Plants for Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve
Great Sand Dunes National Park and Preserve Plant Checklist DRAFT as of 29 November 2005 FERNS AND FERN ALLIES Equisetaceae (Horsetail Family) Vascular Plant Equisetales Equisetaceae Equisetum arvense Present in Park Rare Native Field horsetail Vascular Plant Equisetales Equisetaceae Equisetum laevigatum Present in Park Unknown Native Scouring-rush Polypodiaceae (Fern Family) Vascular Plant Polypodiales Dryopteridaceae Cystopteris fragilis Present in Park Uncommon Native Brittle bladderfern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Dryopteridaceae Woodsia oregana Present in Park Uncommon Native Oregon woodsia Pteridaceae (Maidenhair Fern Family) Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Argyrochosma fendleri Present in Park Unknown Native Zigzag fern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Cheilanthes feei Present in Park Uncommon Native Slender lip fern Vascular Plant Polypodiales Pteridaceae Cryptogramma acrostichoides Present in Park Unknown Native American rockbrake Selaginellaceae (Spikemoss Family) Vascular Plant Selaginellales Selaginellaceae Selaginella densa Present in Park Rare Native Lesser spikemoss Vascular Plant Selaginellales Selaginellaceae Selaginella weatherbiana Present in Park Unknown Native Weatherby's clubmoss CONIFERS Cupressaceae (Cypress family) Vascular Plant Pinales Cupressaceae Juniperus scopulorum Present in Park Unknown Native Rocky Mountain juniper Pinaceae (Pine Family) Vascular Plant Pinales Pinaceae Abies concolor var. concolor Present in Park Rare Native White fir Vascular Plant Pinales Pinaceae Abies lasiocarpa Present -
The American Pomological Society
The American Pomological Society History of Wilder Award Winners Year Wilder Medal Awardee 1873 'Clapp's Favorite' Pear 1875 Marshall P. Wilder - For founding and building the society. Patrick Barry - For valuable service to the society as chairman of the fruit committee. Thomas P. James - For faithful service as treasurer of the society. John J. Thomas - For designing the Wilder Medal. 1881 Robert Manning - For long and valued service in the cause of American pomology. 1885 Professor William J. Beal - For valuable services as secretary of the society. 1911 Lue Gim Gong Orange - Glen St. Mary's Nurseries Company, Deland, FL. 1913 'Goudeau' Orange - L.A. Goudeau, Lake Charles, LA. 'Branch' Apple - James. M. Hoge, Virginia (Bronze medal). 1915 'Hubbard' Grape - T. S. Hubbard Company, Fredonia, NY. 1917 'Turley Winesap' Apple - Joseph A. Burton, Mitchell, IN. 1919 'Golden Delicious' Apple - Stark Bros. Nursery & Orchard Company Louisiana, MO. 1921 Dr. Liberty Hyde Bailey - For his notable contributions to horticulture and his work for the society. 1922 E.A. Riehl - For his work in chestnut tree evaluation, production, and propagation. 1923 'Lobo' Apple - Central Experimental Farm Ottawa, Ontario. 'Cortland' Apple - New York State Agriculture Experiment Station, Geneva, NY. 1926 'Starking' Apple - Stark Bros. Nursery & Orchard Company Louisiana, MO. 1927 University of Minnesota Fruit Breeding Farm - Noteworthy achievement in breeding hardy fruits, of which 32 seedlings have been named and introduced out of a total of 80,500 tested and represented at meeting by 69 plates of 39 seedling apples. 'Sheridan' Grape - New York State Agriculture Experiment Station, Geneva, NY. 'Melba' Apple - Central Experimental Farm Ottawa, Ontario. -
Managing Young Forest Habitat 2 Wildland Weed Management
Natural Resource Management Factsheet Managing Young Forest Habitat 2 Wildland Weed Management What is Young Forest? The footprint of this habitat type has been steadily decreasing the last century due to sprawl, changes in farming practices, and the influx of exotic plant Young Forest, also known as early successional species. A typical example of young forest that ‘did not habitat, is a patchy, varied community with significant happen’ is abandoned hay fields or pastures that still cover from saplings and native shrubs, some residual look like fields -grassy expanses with a few multiflora trees, native forbs and grasses, and in proximity to rose or autumn olive shrubs. They look 'wild', but have blocks of mature forest (Figure 1). It is a dynamic little to offer wildlife. forest community, changing as the woody components The first bulletin in this series, The Benefits of age. Young Forest Habitat, goes into greater depth A great number of wildlife and game species rely explaining what Young Forest is and is not, its on Young Forest at some stage in their life cycle, composition, the species that benefit, and why this including species of acute conservation concern such plant community type is often a best fit for habitat as Golden-winged Warbler (Figure 2); game species management in Pennsylvania state parks. such as American Woodcock, white-tailed deer, wild turkey, ruffed grouse, and eastern cottontail; dozens of Manage Young Forest Habitat 'less charismatic' bird and mammal species; as well as reptiles and amphibians, and countless arthropods, including many pollinator species. Young Forest has distinct habitat components we can manage. -
Late Wildflowers at Bridgeport
Late Wildflowers at Bridgeport The common name in bold is likely the name most frequently used at Bridgeport. The blooming dates are merely guidelines; flowers may appear earlier and extend later. If the flower you are looking for is not here, refer to the Early and Mid-Season tables to see if the flower was placed there. The references used in compiling this table are listed on the last page. Many of the Native American uses were taken directly from the research paper by Vicki Macdonald. Name changes are in blue, in agreement with The Jepson Manual, Second Edition, 2012. Common Scientific Flower Date Family Native Type Description Interesting Facts Name Name Color Blackberry or Rubus ursinus Late Rosaceae Native Perennial White 1-2’ tall and 4’ wide Grows in moist, shady locations in western North California Vine vine with compound America from Baja California to British Columbia. Blackberry, Mar. Below leaves of 3 leaflets. Not listed for Bridgeport, but it is possible since it Dewberry, to 5,000’ Separate male and is throughout the area. Pacific July. female plants. The Blackberry or unwrinkled blossoms It is considered to be an ancestor of loganberry, Pacific have narrower petals boysenberry and marionberry. Dewberry than the Himalayan, The berry is thought to be tastier than the larger and the sweet edible Himalayan berry. The plant could be invasive, but berries are smaller. not nearly as much as the Himalayan. The prickles are smaller and softer. Blackberry or Rubus Late Rosaceae Non- Perennial White 10-40’ long arched Grows in riparian areas, roadsides, pastures, and Himalayan armeniacus native Vine to brambles can form other disturbed areas. -
Ust Be Regis- Reregistration Tered by EPA, Based on Scientific Studies Showing That They Can Be Used Without Posing Unreasonable Risks to People Or the Environment
United States Prevention, Pesticides EPA-738-R-97-011 Environmental Protection And Toxic Substances January 1998 Agency (7508W) R.E.D. FACTS Terbacil Pesticide All pesticides sold or distributed in the United States must be regis- Reregistration tered by EPA, based on scientific studies showing that they can be used without posing unreasonable risks to people or the environment. Because of advances in scientific knowledge, the law requires that pesticides which were first registered before November 1, 1984, be reregistered to ensure that they meet today's more stringent standards. In evaluating pesticides for reregistration, EPA obtains and reviews a complete set of studies from pesticide producers, describing the human health and environmental effects of each pesticide. To implement provi- sions of the Food Quality Protection Act of 1996, EPA considers the special sensitivity of infants and children to pesticides, as well as aggregate expo- sure of the public to pesticide residues from all sources, and the cumulative effects of pesticides and other compounds with common mechanisms of toxicity. The Agency develops any mitigation measures or regulatory controls needed to effectively reduce each pesticide's risks. EPA then reregisters pesticides that meet the safety standard of the FQPA and can be used without posing unreasonable risks to human health or the environ- ment. When a pesticide is eligible for reregistration, EPA explains the basis for its decision in a Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) document. This fact sheet summarizes the information in the RED document for reregistration case 0039, Terbacil. Use Profile Terbacil is a selective herbicide used to control broadleaf weeds on terrestrial food/feed crops (e.g., apples, mint/peppermint/spearmint, sugarcane, and ornamentals), forestry [e.g., cottonwood (forest/shelterbelt)], terrestrial food (e.g., asparagus, blackberry, boysen- berry, dewberry, loganberry, peach, raspberry, youngberry and straw- berry), and terrestrial feed (e.g., alfalfa, sainfoin (hay and fodder), and forage). -
Jose L. Panero June 2012 Address
JOSE L. PANERO JUNE 2012 ADDRESS Section of Integrative Biology The University of Texas Austin, TX 78712 Ph. (512) 232-1990; Fax: (512) 471-3878 E-mail: [email protected] Citizenship: U.S.A. EDUCATION 1990 Ph.D., Botany, University of Tennessee 1986 M.S., Botany, University of Tennessee 1984 B.A., Biology, University of Miami 1979 High School Diploma, Centro Escolar del Lago, México PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE 2002-present Associate Professor of Integrative Biology, and Associate Director of the Plant Resources Center (Herbarium TEX-LL). 1996-2002 Assistant Professor of Botany, and Assistant Director of the Plant Resources Center (Herbarium TEX-LL). 1993-1996 Assistant Professor, and Director, Michigan State University Herbarium. 1991-1993 Research Associate, University of Texas at Austin. 1990-1991 Lecturer, Grinnell College, Grinnell, Iowa. 1988-1990 Graduate Teaching Assistant, University of Tennessee. 1985-1988 Graduate Research Assistant, University of Tennessee. 1984-1985 Graduate Teaching Assistant, University of Tennessee. 1984 Research Assistant, Fairchild Tropical Gardens, Miami, Florida. GRANTS RECEIVED 2004-2007 National Science Foundation, DEB-0344116. Collaborative Research: Systematic Analysis of Evolutionary Radiation of Eupatorieae (Asteraceae). $311, 391. 2004-2006 Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO), CS011. México. Electronic catalogue of Mexican Asteraceae names; final phase. $5, 000. 2002-2004 Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO), V057. México. Electronic Catalogue of Mexican Vascular Plant Specimens Deposited at the University of Texas at Austin Herbaria; fourth phase. $57, 000. 2001-2003 Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO), AE024. México. Electronic catalogue of Mexican Asteraceae names; third phase. -
Blackberry Growing Iftatelea George F
Blackberry Growing iftatelea George F. Waldo and R. Ralph Clark , P14 ra. FEDERAL COOPERATIVE EXTENSION" SERVICE OREGON STATE COLLEGE i CORVALLIS Cooperative Extension work in Agriculture and Home Economics, F. E. Price, director. Oregon State College and the United States Department of Agriculture cooperating. Printed and distributed in furtherance of Acts of Congress of May 8 and June 30, 1914. Extension Bulletin 768 August 1957 CONTENTS Importance of the Industry 4 Economic Considerations 4 Place in the Farm Plan 4 Preparation for Planting 5 Propagation 6 Planting Systems 6 Planting 7 Choice of Varieties 8 Varieties Grown in Oregon 8 Care of the Plantation 13 Managing the Growing Canes 15 Methods of Training 16 Training Systems 18 Effects of Growth Regulators 20 Harvesting 21 Insects and Diseases 21 2 Blackberry Growing laareplet By George F. Waldo, Horticulturist Fruit and Nut Crops Section, Horticultural Crops Research Branch, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture and R. Ralph Clark, Extension Horticulturist Oregon State College BLACKBERRY growing industry in Oregon is centered THEin the Willamette Valley counties of western Oregon. The area's normal climatic conditions, a mild autumn, a cool, dry sum- mer, and sufficient spring moisture to develop the fruit, favors the production of these berries. Also, the mild but moist autumn weather helps cane growth and propagation by layering, and the dry summer permits harvesting with minimum loss from moldy or decaying berries. When the first white settlers arrived in Oregon they found an abundance of the highly flavored trailing wild blackberry, Rubus macro petalus. Later the Evergreen variety was introduced to Oregon from Europe and spread Quickly by natural means.