DOCSLIB.ORG

The Malcontent Malevoles Chamber

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Malcontent Malevoles Chamber A Digital Anthology of Early Modern English Drama emed.folger.edu Discover over four hundred early modern English plays that were professionally performed in London between 1576 and 1642. Browse plays written by Shakespeare’s contemporaries; explore the repertoires of London’s professional companies; and download plays for reading and research. This documentary edition has been edited to provide an accurate and transparent transcription of a single copy of the earliest surviving print edition of this play. Further material, including editorial policy and XML files of the play, is available on the EMED website. EMED texts are edited and encoded by Meaghan Brown, Michael Poston, and Elizabeth Williamson, and build on work done by the EEBO-TCP and the Shakespeare His Contemporaries project. This project is funded by a Humanities Collections and Reference Resources grant from the NEH’s Division of Preservation and Access. Plays distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. img: 1­a ismigg: :[ N1­/bA] sig: A2r ln 0001 THE ln 0002 MALCONTENT. ln 0003 By John Marston. ln 0004 1604. ln 0005 Printed at London by V. S. for William Aspley, ln 0006 and are to be sold at his shop in Paul’s ln 0007 Churchyard. img: 2­a ismigg: :A 22­vb sig: A3r ln 0001 BENJAMINO JONSONIO ln 0002 POETAE ln 0003 ELEGANTISSIMO ln 0004 GRAVISSIMO ln 0005 AMICO ln 0006 SUO CANDIDO ET CORDATO, ln 0007 JOHANNES MARSTON ln 0008 MUSARUM ALUMNUS ln 0009 ASPERAM HANC SUAM THALIAM ln 0010 D. D. img: 3­a sig: A3v ln 0001 To the Reader. ln 0002 I Am an ill Orator; and in ln 0003 truth, use to indite more honestly ln 0004 then eloquently, for ln 0005 ’tis my custom to speak as ln 0006 I think, and write as I speak. ln 0007 In plainness therefore understand, that in some ln 0008 things I have willingly erred, ln 0009 as in supposing a Duke of Genoa, and in taking ln 0010 names different from that City’s families: for ln 0011 which some may wittily accuse me, but my defense ln 0012 shall be as honest, as many reproofs unto me have ln 0013 been most malicious. Since (I heartily protest) ’twas ln 0014 my care to write so far from reasonable offense, ln 0015 that even strangers, in whose State I laid my Scene, ln 0016 should not from thence draw any disgrace to any, ln 0017 dead or living. Yet in despite of my endeavors, I understand, ln 0018 some have been most unadvisedly overcunning ln 0019 in misinterpreting me, and with subtlety (as deep ln 0020 as hell) have maliciously spread ill rumors, which ln 0021 springing from themselves, might to themselves ln 0022 have heavily returned. Surely I desire to satisfy every ln 0023 firm spirit, who in all his actions, proposeth to ln 0024 himself no more ends than God and virtue do, ln 0025 whose intentions are always simple: to such I img: 3­b sig: A4r ln 0026 protest, that with my free understanding, I have not ln 0027 glanced at disgrace of any, but of those, whose unquiet ln 0028 studies labor innovation, contempt of holy ln 0029 policy, reverent comely superiority, and established ln 0030 unity: for the rest of my supposed tartness, I ln 0031 fear not, but unto every worthy mind ’twill be approved ln 0032 so general and honest, as may modestly ln 0033 pass with the freedom of a Satire. I would fain ln 0034 leave the paper; only one thing afflicts me, to ln 0035 think that Scenes invented, merely to be spoken, ln 0036 should be inforcively published to be read, and that ln 0037 the least hurt I can receive, is to do myself the ln 0038 wrong. But since others otherwise would do me ln 0039 more, the least inconvenience is to be accepted. I ln 0040 have myself therefore set forth this Comedy; but ln 0041 so, that my enforced absence must much rely upon ln 0042 the Printer’s discretion: but I shall entreat, slight ln 0043 errors in orthography may be as slightly o’erpassed; ln 0044 and that the unhandsome shape which this ln 0045 trifle in reading presents, may be pardoned, for ln 0046 the pleasure it once afforded you, when it was presented ln 0047 with the soul of lively action. linm 0g0:4 48­a Me mea sequentur fata. sig: A4v ln 0049 J. M. ln 0001 Giovanni Disguised Malevole sometime ln 0002 Altofronto Duke of Genoa. ln 0003 Pietro Jacomo Duke of Genoa. ln 0004 Mendoza A Minion to the Duchess of ln 0005 Pietro Jacomo. ln 0006 Celso A friend to Altofront. ln 0007 Bilioso. An old choleric Marshal. ln 0008 Prepasso A Gentleman Usher. ln 0009 Ferneze A young Courtier, and enamored ln 0010 on the Duchess. ln 0011 Ferrardo A Minion to Duke Pietro ln 0012 Jacomo. ln 0013 Equato. Two Courtiers. ln 0014 Guerrino. ln 0015 Aurelia Duchess to Duke Pietro Jacomo. ln 0016 Maria Duchess to Duke Altofront. ln 0017 Emilia Two Ladies attending the Duchess. ln 0018 Bianca linm 0g0:1 49­b Maquerelle An old Panderess. sig: B1r wln 0001 THE Vexat wln 0002 MALCONTENT. censura columbas. wln 0003 ACTUS PRIMUS. SCAENA PRIMA. wln 0004 The vilest out of tune Music being heard. wln 0005 Enter Bilioso and Prepasso. wln 0006 Bilioso. wln 0007 Why how now? are ye mad? or drunk? or wln 0008 both? or what? wln 0009 Prepasso Are ye building Babylon there? wln 0010 Bilioso Here’s a noise in Court, you think you wln 0011 are in a Tavern, do you not? wln 0012 Prepasso You think you are in a brothel house do you wln 0013 not? This room is ill scented. wln 0014 Enter one with a Perfume. wln 0015 So; perfume; perfume; some upon me I pray thee: The wln 0016 Duke is upon instant entrance; so, make place there. wln 0017 SCAENA SECUNDA. wln 0018 Enter the Duke Pietro, Ferrardo, Count Equato, wln 0019 Count Celso before, and Guerrino. wln 0020 Pietro. Where breathes that Music? wln 0021 Bilioso. The discord rather than the Music is heard wln 0022 from the Malcontent Malevoles chamber. wln 0023 Ferrardo Malevole. wln 0024 Malevole Yaugh, god a’ man what dost thou there: Duke’s Out of his wln 0025 Ganymede Juno’s jealous of thy long stockings: shadow Chamber. wln 0026 of a woman, what wouldst Weasel? thou lamb a’ wln 0027 Court: what dost thou bleat for? ah you smooth­chinned wln 0028 Catamite. wln 0029 Pietro. Come down thou rugged Cur, and snarl here, wln 0030 I give thy dogged sullenness free liberty: trot about and wln 0031 bespurtle whom thou pleasest. img: 5­a sig: B1v wln 0032 Malevole. I’ll come among you, you Goatish­blooded wln 0033 Toderers, as Gum into Taffeta, to fret, to fret: I’ll fall like a wln 0034 sponge into water to suck up; to suck up. Howl again. I’ll wln 0035 pray, and come to you. wln 0036 Pietro. This Malevole is one of the most prodigious affections wln 0037 that ever conversed with nature; A man or rather a wln 0038 monster; more discontent than Lucifer when he was thrust wln 0039 out of the presence, his appetite is unsatiable as the Grave; wln 0040 as far from any content as from heaven, his highest delight wln 0041 is to procure others’ vexation, and therein he thinks wln 0042 he truly serves heaven; for ’tis his position, whosoever in wln 0043 this earth can be contented is a slave and damned; therefore wln 0044 does he afflict all in that to which they are most affected; the wln 0045 Elements struggle within him; his own soul is at variance; wln 0046 his speech is halter­worthy at all hours; I like him wln 0047 faith, he gives good intelligence to my spirit, makes me understand wln 0048 those weaknesses which others’ flattery palliate: wln 0049 hark they sing. wln 0050 SCAENA TERTIA wln 0051 A Song. wln 0052 Enter Malevole after the Song. wln 0053 See he comes; now shall you hear the extremity of a wln 0054 Malcontent: he is as free as air; he blows over every wln 0055 man. And sir whence come you now? wln 0056 Malevole From the public place of much dissimulation; wln 0057 the church wln 0058 Pietro What didst there? wln 0059 Malevole Talk with a Usurer; take up at Interest. wln 0060 Pietro I wonder what religion thou art? wln 0061 Malevole Of a Soldier’s religion. wln 0062 Pietro And what dost thou think makes most Infidels now? wln 0063 Malevole Sects, sects, I have seen seeming Piety change wln 0064 her robe so oft, that sure none but some arch­devil can wln 0065 shape her a new Petticoat. img: 5­b sig: B2r wln 0066 Pietro. Of a religious policy. wln 0067 Malevole But damnation on a politic religion. wln 0068 Pietro. But what’s the common news abroad Malevole, wln 0069 thou dog’st rumor still. wln 0070 Malevole Common news? why common words are, God wln 0071 save ye, Fare ye well: common actions, Flattery and Cozenage: wln 0072 common things, Women and Cuckolds: and how wln 0073 does my little Ferrard: a ye lecherous Animal, my little wln 0074 Ferret, he goes sucking up and down the Palace into every wln 0075 Hen’s nest like a Weasel: and to what dost thou addict thy wln 0076 time to now, more than to those Antique painted drabs that wln 0077 are still affected of young Courtiers, Flattery, Pride and Venery.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Book Review: TF Wharton (Ed). the Drama of John Marston. Cambridge
    112 Book Reviews unfair to criticize a researcher too harshly for a following a pre-existing set of selection criteria. At the same time it is reasonable to expect that a declared set of criteria should be rigorously maintained, and that the intellectual basis of those criteria should be clearly stated and take some account of the historical reality of the period under examination. The ambitious task undertaken by the REED project is to be applauded, and it is to be regretted that the present volume falls somewhat short of the standards set by the project as a whole. david hickman T.F. Wharton (ed). The Drama of John Marston: Critical Re-Visions. Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Pp xiii, 233. For a dramatist with at least three canonically important works (The Dutch Courtesan, The Malcontent, and Antonio’s Revenge) contemporary critics have been especially chary of addressing John Marston’s plays. Of those three works, one (Antonio’s Revenge) finds general mention only as a spectacularized and stylized foil to Hamlet.1 Indeed, only a single work – The Dutch Courtesan – today receives attention approaching any degree of regularity: Susan Baker, Donna Hamilton, and Jean Howard have each written outstanding material- ist/feminist appraisals.2 This continuing paucity of critical regard is especially surprising given the astonishing generic range and inventiveness of Marston’s plays as well as their incisive representations of a particularly volatile period in early modern culture. Marston collaborated brilliantly with some of the most distinguished dramatists of the period (Ben Jonson and George Chapman on Eastward Ho!; John Webster on additions to The Malcontent) and also mis- chievously burlesqued the genres they themselves defined.
    [Show full text]
  • The Moral Basis of Family Relationships in the Plays of Shakespeare and His Contemporaries: a Study in Renaissance Ideas
    The Moral Basis of Family Relationships in the plays of Shakespeare and his Contemporaries: a Study in Renaissance Ideas. A submission for the degree of doctor of philosophy by Stephen David Collins. The Department of History of The University of York. June, 2016. ABSTRACT. Families transact their relationships in a number of ways. Alongside and in tension with the emotional and practical dealings of family life are factors of an essentially moral nature such as loyalty, gratitude, obedience, and altruism. Morality depends on ideas about how one should behave, so that, for example, deciding whether or not to save a brother's life by going to bed with his judge involves an ethical accountancy drawing on ideas of right and wrong. It is such ideas that are the focus of this study. It seeks to recover some of ethical assumptions which were in circulation in early modern England and which inform the plays of the period. A number of plays which dramatise family relationships are analysed from the imagined perspectives of original audiences whose intellectual and moral worlds are explored through specific dramatic situations. Plays are discussed as far as possible in terms of their language and plots, rather than of character, and the study is eclectic in its use of sources, though drawing largely on the extensive didactic and polemical writing on the family surviving from the period. Three aspects of family relationships are discussed: first, the shifting one between parents and children, second, that between siblings, and, third, one version of marriage, that of the remarriage of the bereaved.
    [Show full text]
  • Playwright and Minister
    PLAYWRIGHT AND MAN OF GOD: RELIGION AND CONVENTION IN THE COMIC PLAYS OF JOHN MARSTON by Blagomir Georgiev Blagoev A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of English University of Toronto © Copyright by Blagomir Georgiev Blagoev (2010) PLAYWRIGHT AND MAN OF GOD: RELIGION AND CONVENTION IN THE COMIC PLAYS OF JOHN MARSTON Blagomir Georgiev Blagoev Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Department of English University of Toronto 2010 ABSTRACT John Marston’s literary legacy has inevitably existed in the larger-than-life shadows of his great contemporaries William Shakespeare and Ben Jonson. In the last two centuries, his works were hardly taken on their own terms but were perceived instead in overt or implicit comparison to Shakespeare’s or Jonson’s. As a result, Marston’s plays acquired the lasting but unfair image of haphazard concoctions whose cheap sensationalism and personal satire often got them in trouble with the authorities. This was the case until recently, especially with Marston’s comic drama. Following revisionist trends, this study sets out to restore some perspective: it offers a fresh reading of Marston’s comic plays and collaborations—Antonio and Mellida, What You Will, Jack Drum’s Entertainment, The Dutch Courtesan, The Malcontent, Parasitaster, Eastward Ho, and Histrio-Mastix—by pursuing a more nuanced contextualization with regard to religious context and archival evidence. The first central contention here is that instead of undermining political and religious authority, Marston’s comic drama can demonstrate consistent conformist and conservative affinities, which imply a seriously considered agenda. This study’s second main point is that the perceived failures of Marston’s comic plays—such as tragic ii elements, basic characterization, and sudden final reversals—can be plausibly read as deliberate effects, designed with this agenda in mind.
    [Show full text]
  • Identity, Disguise and Satire in Three
    IDENTITY, DISGUISE AND SATIRE IN THREE COMEDIES OF JOHN MARSTON by BARRY MALCOLM PEGG B.A., University of Keele, 1963 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS in the Department of English We accept this thesis as conforming to the required, standard THE UNIVERSITY ,OF BB.2T.I SH COLUMBIA July, 1969 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and Study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the Head of my Department or by his representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my r written permission. Department The University of British Columbia Vancouver 8, Canada ABSTRACT This thesis investigates the use of the conventions of disguise and deception in three comedies of John Marston (1576-1634)—What You Will. The Malcontent. and The Dutch Courtesan—in order to examine his handling of a convention for thematic purposes. The frequency of disguise in the theatre of the period may be explained by its appeal on more than one level. Its direct visual display of theatrical ingenuity was an immediate source of compelling interest for all spectators, whether in comedy or tragedy. On a more sophisticated level, the metaphysical implications of the discrepancy between ap• pearance and reality were explored thematically by the more thoughtful of the public-theatre playwrights, as well as the satiric playwrights of the private theatres, both of course making full use of the purely theatrical possibilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Revenge Tragedy | Eleanor Prosser (Essay Date 1967)
    Literary Criticism (1400-1800): Revenge Tragedy | Eleanor Prosser (essay date 1967) Revenge Tragedy | Eleanor Prosser (essay date 1967) ©2009 eNotes.com, Inc. or its Licensors. Please see copyright information at the end of this document. Eleanor Prosser (essay date 1967) SOURCE: Prosser, Eleanor. “Revenge on the English Stage, 1562-1607.” In Hamlet and Revenge, pp. 36-73. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1967. [In the following essay, Prosser examines a vast array of revenge tragedies in an effort to elucidate “the moral response of the Elizabethan audience to revenge itself.”] Although a study of the Elizabethan revenge play normally restricts itself to plays related to the “Kydian formula” as defined by Fredson Bowers, our concern in this chapter is with the moral response of the Elizabethan audience to revenge itself. If we can determine the audience's reaction to specific revenge motifs in any type of play (in a Biblical drama such as David and Bethsabe, a chronicle history such as Edward II, or a comedy such as The Dumb Knight, as well as in a revenge play proper such as The Spanish Tragedy), we should be better prepared to recognize established conventions. For an audience, a given convention evokes a given response: a bastard son who chafes at his inferior position is a dangerous fellow, whether he appears in Much Ado About Nothing or King Lear. We shall, accordingly, examine all plays produced between 1562 and 1607 in which revenge is a clearly defined motive.1 To understand the full impact of the revenge motif on the Elizabethan audience, we should probably start with the medieval drama.
    [Show full text]
  • Disgusting John Marston: Sensationalism and the Limits of a Post-Modern Marston
    Disgusting John Marston: Sensationalism and the Limits of A Post-Modern Marston Georgia Brown, Queens’ College, Cambridge University [The conspirators] pluck out [PIERO’S] tongue and triumph over him. Antonio. I have’t, Pandulpho; the veins panting bleed, Trickling fresh gore about my fist. Bind fast! So, so. Ghost of Andrugio. Blest be thy hand. I taste the joys of heaven, Viewing my son triumph in his black blood. Balurdo. Down to the dungeon with him; I’ll dungeon with him; I’ll fool you! Sir Geoffrey will be Sir Geoffrey. I’ll tickle you! Antonio. Behold, black dog! [Holding up PIERO’S tongue.] Pandulpho. Grinn’st thou, thou snurling cur? Alberto. Eat thy black liver! Antonio. To thine anguish see A fool triumphant in thy misery. Vex him, Balurdo. Pandulpho. He weeps! Now do I glorify my hands. I had no vengeance if I had no tears. (Antonio’s Revenge 5.5.34-45)1 With its bloodlust, energy and violence, the murder of Piero at the climax of Antonio’s Revenge, exemplifies John Marston’s sensationalism, and its unstable, some would say incoherent, morality. This is, after all, the moment when the victims of Piero’s tyrannical regime finally impose justice and achieve some kind of redress, and yet these instruments of justice are themselves tainted by cruelty and the suspicion that revenge has become the means to achieve self-glorification. When the ghost of Andrugio hails his son, Antonio, “triumph[ing] in his black blood” (line 37), is the blood Piero’s, or Antonio’s, and do Andrugio’s words suggest kinship between the villain, Piero, and the hero, Antonio? Typically, for Marston’s sensationalism, this scene combines moral confusion with generic confusion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Subjectivity of Revenge: Senecan Drama and the Discovery of the Tragic in Kyd and Shakespeare
    THE SUBJECTIVITY OF REVENGE: SENECAN DRAMA AND THE DISCOVERY OF THE TRAGIC IN KYD AND SHAKESPEARE JORDICORAL D.PHIL THE UNIVERSITY OF YORK DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH AND RELATED LITERATURE SEPTEMBER 2001 But all the time life, always one and the same, always incomprehensibly keeping its identity, fills the universe and is renewed at every moment in innumerable combinations and metamorphoses. You are anxious about whether you will rise from the dead or not, but you have risen already - you rose from the dead when you were born and you didn't notice it. Will you feel pain? Do the tissues feel their disintegration? In other words, what will happen to your consciousness. But what is consciousness? Let's see. To try consciously to go to sleep is a sure way of having insomnia, to try to be conscious of one's own digestion is a sure way to upset the stomach. Consciousness is a poison when we apply it to ourselves. Consciousness is a beam of light directed outwards, it lights up the way ahead of us so that we do not trip up. It's like the head-lamps on a railway engine - if you turned the beam inwards there would be a catastrophe. 'So what will happen to your consciousness? Your consciousness, yours, not anybody else's. Well, what are you? That's the crux of the matter. Let's try to find out. What is it about you that you have always known as yourself? What are you conscious of in yourself? Your kidneys? Your liver? Your blood vessels? - No.
    [Show full text]
  • John Marston at the `Mart of Woe': the Antonio Plays 14 Rick Bowers 2 John Marston: a Theatrical Perspective 27 W
    THE DRAMA OF JOHN MARSTON CRITICAL RE-VISIONS edited by T. F. W H A RTO N published by the press syndicate of the university of cambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom cambridge university press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge cb2 2ru, UK www.cup.cam.ac.uk 40 West 20th Street, New York, ny 10011±4211, USA www.cup.org 10 Stamford Road, Oakleigh, Melbourne 3166, Australia Ruiz de AlarcoÂn 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain # Cambridge University Press 2000 The book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2000 Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge Typeset in Baskerville 11/12.5pt System 3b2 [ce] A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Library of Congress cataloguing in publication data The Drama of John Marston: Critical Re-Visions / edited by T. F. Wharton. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 0 521 65136 0 (hardback) 1. Marston, John, 1575±1634 ± Criticism and interpretation. i.Wharton,T.F. pr2697.d73 2000 822'.3 ± dc21 isbn 0 521 65136 0 hardback Contents Notes on contributors page ix Acknowledgements xi Note on the text xii Introduction 1 T. F. Wharton 1 John Marston at the `mart of woe': the Antonio plays 14 Rick Bowers 2 John Marston: a theatrical perspective 27 W. Reavley Gair 3 Varieties of fantasy in What You Will 45 Matthew Steggle 4 Safety in ®ction: Marston's recreational poetics 60 Patrick Buckridge 5 Insatiate punning in Marston's courtesan plays 82 Richard Scarr 6 Touching the self: masturbatory Marston 100 William W.
    [Show full text]
  • Unfair to Criticize a Researcher Too Harshly for a Following a Pre-Existing Set of Selection Criteria
    112 Book Reviews unfair to criticize a researcher too harshly for a following a pre-existing set of selection criteria. At the same time it is reasonable to expect that a declared set of criteria should be rigorously maintained, and that the intellectual basis of those criteria should be clearly stated and take some account of the historical reality of the period under examination. The ambitious task undertaken by the REED project is to be applauded, and it is to be regretted that the present volume falls somewhat short of the standards set by the project as a whole. david hickman T.F. Wharton (ed). The Drama of John Marston: Critical Re-Visions. Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Pp xiii, 233. For a dramatist with at least three canonically important works (The Dutch Courtesan, The Malcontent, and Antonio’s Revenge) contemporary critics have been especially chary of addressing John Marston’s plays. Of those three works, one (Antonio’s Revenge) finds general mention only as a spectacularized and stylized foil to Hamlet.1 Indeed, only a single work – The Dutch Courtesan – today receives attention approaching any degree of regularity: Susan Baker, Donna Hamilton, and Jean Howard have each written outstanding material- ist/feminist appraisals.2 This continuing paucity of critical regard is especially surprising given the astonishing generic range and inventiveness of Marston’s plays as well as their incisive representations of a particularly volatile period in early modern culture. Marston collaborated brilliantly with some of the most distinguished dramatists of the period (Ben Jonson and George Chapman on Eastward Ho!; John Webster on additions to The Malcontent) and also mis- chievously burlesqued the genres they themselves defined.
    [Show full text]
  • Metatheatrical Rivalry in John Marston's Antonio's Revenge
    3532 Early Theatre 22.1 (2019), 93–118 https://doi.org/10.12745/et.22.1.3691 Mitchell Macrae ‘[A]dore my topless villainy’: Metatheatrical Rivalry in John Marston’s Antonio’s Revenge Marston’s Antonio’s Revenge is a self-reflexive tragedy with characters who speak and act like characters familiar with the conventions of Elizabethan revenge plays. This article argues that Marston’s use of metatheatricality allegorizes the competitive nature of commercial theatres. As Marston’s characters seek to emulate and surpass their theatrical models, revenge becomes a medium for aesthetic achievement, a show- case for acting and rhetorical skill. The play expands the theatrum mundi trope, imagining the world not as a single stage but as a marketplace of rival stages wherein playwrights vie for applause and seek recognition for their theatrical brilliance. Despite Antonio’s Revenge declaring itself a serious tragedy, a ‘black-visaged [show]’ that seeks to ‘weigh massy in judicious scale’, the play’s metatheatricality has made the play difficult for scholars and critics to categorize (Prologue 20, 30).1 Characters in Antonio’s Revenge do not speak so much as they extemporize, riffing knowingly on the conventions of early modern revenge plays. The dialogue in the play often exaggerates the stock rhetoric of revenge tragedy to the point that John Marston’s play may seem indecorously tongue-in-cheek. Samuel Schoen- baum calls Marston’s work ‘bizarre — more eccentric than the art of any of his contemporaries’ and claims that ‘the essential incongruity of Marston’s work’ is its most ‘striking feature’.2 R.A.
    [Show full text]
  • ©2019 William A. Tanner, Jr. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
    ©2019 William A. Tanner, Jr. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED THE MELANCHOLY MALCONTENT IN EARLY MODERN THEATER AND CULTURE by WILLIAM AARON TANNER, JR. A dissertation submitted to the School of Graduate Studies Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Graduate Program in English Written under the direction of Henry S. Turner And approved by _____________________________ _____________________________ _____________________________ _____________________________ New Brunswick, New Jersey October, 2019 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION The Melancholy Malcontent in Early Modern Theater & Culture WILLIAM AARON TANNER, JR. Dissertation Director: Henry S. Turner The following study illuminates a set of failed responses to social and political problems sedimented, personified, and explored through the “malcontent,” a politically charged word borrowed from French politics that became a key social and literary type in early modern England. Much prior criticism has approached typology as a set of static signs to be catalogued; instead, this study traces the role of the malcontent in an evolving inquiry in England at the turn of the seventeenth century into questions of injustice, participatory politics, tyranny, and political stability. The end of the Elizabethan and beginning of the Jacobean eras was a time of great fear and anxiety, forging these questions of abstract political philosophy into matters of immediate, pressing concern. Attending to the historical and literary contexts of exemplary malcontents (both historical persons and literary figures), the study demonstrates that far from being a static figure, the malcontent was a flexible hermeneutic for syncretically fusing multiple discourses: much as Drew Daniel has described “melancholy” as a Deleuzian “assemblage,” the politicized malcontent subset of melancholics acts almost as a rubics cube for early modern thinkers to examine the confluences and consequences of shifting arrangements of ideas.
    [Show full text]
  • “Here Lay My Hope”: Attribution, Collaboration
    “HERE LAY MY HOPE”: ATTRIBUTION, COLLABORATION, AND THE AUTHORSHIP OF THE THIRD ADDITION TO THE SPANISH TRAGEDY Keegan Cooper Submitted to the faculty of the University Graduate School in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree Master of Arts in the Department of English, Indiana University October 2016 Accepted by the Graduate Faculty, Indiana University, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts. Master’s Thesis Committee ______________________________________ Dr. Terri Bourus, Chair ______________________________________ Dr. Jonathan Eller ______________________________________ Dr. April Witt ii Dedication For Mom, who first introduced me to Shakespeare and inspired me to imagine and create. For Char, Beeg, and Pops. Without your company and counsel, this thesis might not have been completed. iii Acknowledgements A huge thank you to my thesis committee: Dr. Jonathan Eller and Dr. April Witt. Your feedback in and out of class has been vital these past few years. And I cannot thank my mentors enough: my thesis chair, Dr. Terri Bourus, and Dr. Gary Taylor. Without your support and guidance over the past three years, I would not have been able to finish my educational career as successfully as I have. (And thanks for employing me too!) iv Table of Contents Introduction 1 Part 1: Backstory 3 Part 2: Control Tests 19 First Segment 25 Second Segment 42 Part 3: Conclusion 50 Bibliography 52 Curriculum Vitae v Introduction The authorship of the five additions to Thomas Kyd’s The Spanish Tragedy remains a conundrum. Ben Jonson was first thought responsible, but a majority of scholars argue against his involvement.
    [Show full text]