DOCSLIB.ORG

The Effect of Pond Dyes on Mosquitoes and Other Freshwater Invertebrates

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Effect of Pond Dyes on Mosquitoes and Other Freshwater Invertebrates The effect of pond dyes on mosquitoes and other freshwater invertebrates A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Biological Sciences Natali Ortiz Perea January 2018 Declaration I confirm that this is my own work and the use of all material from other sources has been properly and fully acknowledged. Natali Ortiz Perea ii ABSTRACT Freshwater habitats are important because they represent two percent of Earth’s water resources, are highly diverse in aquatic organisms and are the most productive and threatened ecosystem worldwide. Pollution, urbanization and climatic changes are responsible for drastic changes in these ecosystems. The creation of new ponds offers an opportunity to increase biodiversity, landscape connectivity and provide new habitat for organisms. However, new ponds might be a good habitat for mosquitoes to lay eggs. Mosquitoes have worldwide distribution and are responsible for most of the vector-borne diseases, affecting thousands of people and causing millions of deaths. British mosquitoes currently do not carry human diseases, but they are a biting nuisance. Their distribution, abundance, species composition and potential for mosquito disease transmission are intimately linked to the physical environment. Culex pipiens is commonly found in UK gardens and is a potential vector of viruses including the West Nile Virus. However, any environmental factors that significantly change the distribution and population of Cx. pipiens could impact future risks of disease transmission. Pond dyes are a cosmetic product for garden ponds and lakes; they inhibit algal growth and improve the overall appearance of the water body reflecting surrounding planting. The dyes block red light from entering the water, interrupting the process of photosynthesis and therefore inhibiting the growth of certain aquatic plants such as algae. Although these dyes are non-toxic to fish and invertebrates, their use in urban gardens raises questions linked to mosquito oviposition, since coloured water can be an attractant. iii This research focussed on the impact of pond dyes on mosquitoes and freshwater macroinvertebrates. Gravid female Culex mosquitoes preferred to lay eggs in black dyed water under laboratory conditions and in a semi-field choice test but there was no evidence that these results translated into a difference in a fully natural ecosystem. Mosquito survivorship in black dyed water was significantly reduced; Dyes of other colours had no impact on oviposition but did impact survival in both field and laboratory conditions. The impact of black pond dye on small artificial ponds found effects depending on the experimental method. In ponds that were cleared of all animals but they reseeded with known species of macroinvertebrates dyes impacted negatively on the biodiversity, evenness and abundance of species. By contrast, in the second pond study, where dye was applied to the existing macroinvertebrate communities, no differences were detected between treated and untreated ponds in respect to biodiversity or abundance. A final study on the impact of black pond dye on mosquito larval predation by Chaoborus flavicans and Gammarus pulex found no difference in predation. Considering the concerns over potential future spread of disease in urban environments and the properties of these dyes, more studies are needed to understand how aquatic animals and interactions between species respond in presence of colour dyes. iv ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express the deepest appreciation to my supervisor Dr Amanda Callaghan for giving me the guiding, comments, support and the opportunity to work with her and for her help, patience and encouragement throughout this work. I would like to extend a special thanks to the committee members Professor Mark Fellowes and Dr Graham Holloway for giving me feedback during the process of my thesis, helpful guidance of statistically advice and collection of Gammarus pulex. I would like to extend a special thanks to Ross Cuthbert for his collaboration, help and patience to analyse the functional response data. I thank the project students I have worked; Rebecca Gander, Oliver Abbey, Tania Smith, Sophie Connor and Alice Hurley for their help and company in the field. I would like to thank all my friends both from Room 8 and outside University for their support, company and good moments. I am extremely grateful to my parents and sister for their entire support, encouragement, patience, love and advice during this process. I also thank the sponsor Colciencias who funded my studies with a PhD scholarship and Colfuturo who helped me with a grant. v Table of Contents ABSTRACT ...................................................................................................................................... iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................... v LIST OF ABREVIATIONS .............................................................................................................. ix INDEX OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ x INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 16 CHAPTER 1. LITERATURE REVIEW.......................................................................................... 18 1.1. Freshwater environments ................................................................................................. 18 1.1.1. Ponds ........................................................................................................................ 20 1.1.2. Other standing water in urban habitats ..................................................................... 27 1.2. Introduction to Mosquitoes .............................................................................................. 29 1.2.1. Mosquitoes as vectors of disease .............................................................................. 34 1.3. Infectious diseases in Europe ........................................................................................... 37 1.4. Mosquitoes in Great Britain. ............................................................................................ 40 1.5. Culex pipiens .................................................................................................................... 45 1.6. Mosquito predators in Great Britain ................................................................................. 47 1.7. Aims and objectives of the study ..................................................................................... 51 CHAPTER 2. Pond dyes are Culex mosquito oviposition attractants ............................................. 55 2.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 55 2.2 Materials and Methods ..................................................................................................... 58 2.2.1 Trapping wild gravid female mosquitoes ................................................................. 58 2.2.2 Oviposition preferences of wild mosquitoes ............................................................ 58 2.2.3 Emergence study ...................................................................................................... 60 2.2.4 Wild population numbers in dye treated and untreated artificial containers ............ 60 2.2.5 Statistics ................................................................................................................... 62 2.3 Results .............................................................................................................................. 64 2.1 Mosquito oviposition selection in laboratory conditions and oviposition selection in the tent 64 2.2 Wild population numbers in dye treated and untreated artificial containers ................ 64 2.3 Emergence study: field conditions ............................................................................... 66 2.4 Discussion ........................................................................................................................ 68 CHAPTER 3. The effect of pond dyes on oviposition and survival in wild UK Culex mosquitoes 73 3.1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 73 vi 3.2 Materials and Methods ..................................................................................................... 77 3.2.1 Trapping wild gravid females................................................................................... 77 3.2.2 Pond dyes ................................................................................................................. 79 3.2.3 Oviposition preferences of wild mosquitoes ............................................................ 79 3.2.4 Emergence study ...................................................................................................... 80 3.2.5 Natural colonisation of containers with or without dyes. ......................................... 82 3.2.6 Statistical analysis .................................................................................................... 82 3.3 Results .............................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Philippine Species of Mesocyclops (Crustacea: Copepoda) As a Biological Control Agent of Aedes Aegypti (Linnaeus)
    Philippine Species of Mesocyclops (Crustacea: Copepoda) as a Biological Control Agent of Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus) Cecilia Mejica Panogadia-Reyes*#, Estrella Irlandez Cruz** and Soledad Lopez Bautista*** *Department of Biology, Emilio Aguinaldo College, Ermita, Manila, MM, Philippines **Research Institute for Tropical Medicine, Alabang, Muntinlupa, MM, Philippines ***Department of Medical Technology, Emilio Aguinaldo College, Ermita, Manila, MM, Philippines Abstract The predatory capacity of two local populations of Mesocyclops aspericornis (Daday) and Mesocyclops ogunnus species were evaluated, for the first time in the Philippines, as a biological control agent for Aedes aegypti (L) mosquitoes. Under laboratory conditions, Mesocyclops attacked the mosquito first instar larvae by the tail, side and head. The mean of first instar larvae consumed by M. aspericornis and M. ogunnus were 23.96 and 15.00, respectively. An analysis of the variance showed that there was a highly significant difference between the mean number of first instar mosquito larvae consumed by M. aspericornis and by M. ogunnus, which indicated that the former is a more efficient predator of dengue mosquito larvae. The results of the small-scale field trials showed that the mean number of surviving larvae in experimental drums was 63.10 and in control drums was 202.95. The Student t-test of means indicated that there was a significant difference between the mean number of surviving larvae in the drums with and without M. aspericornis. The findings indicated that M. aspericornis females were good biological control agents, for they destroyed/consumed about two-thirds of the wild dengue mosquito larvae population. Keywords: Mesocyclops aspericornis, Mesocyclops ogunnus, biological control agent, Aedes aegypti, Aedes albopictus, Philippines.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Insects of Freshwater Pond and Their Control ~
    COMMON INSECTS OF FRESHWATER POND AND THEIR CONTROL ~ Bulletin No. 54 Krishna Mitra and Kuldip Kumar 11 ~3r.J!I leAR CENTRAL INLAND CAPTURE FISHERIES RESEARCH INSTITUTE (Indfan Council of Agricultural Research) Barrackpore - 743101 West Bengal India. COMMON INSECTS OF FRESHWATER PONDS AND THEIR CONTROL Bulletin No. 54 March 1988 Krishna Mitra and Kuldip Kumar IfII'JrF ICAR CENTRAL INLAND CAPTURE FISHERIES RESEARCH INSTITUTE (Indian Council of Aqricultural Research) Barrackpore - 743101 West Bengal India. CONTENTS Introduction 1 Classification of insects 2 Order EPHEMEROPTERA 2 Family : Baetidae 2 Order ODONATA 3 Family: Libellulidae 4 Aeshnidae 5 Coenagrtonldae 5 Order HEMIPTERA 6 Family: Gerridae 7 Notonectidae 7 Pleidae 8 Nepidae 9 Belostomatidae 10 Cortxtdae 11 Order COLEOPTERA 12 Family : Dytiscidae 13 Hydrophilidae - 14 Gyrinidae 16 Curculionidae 16 Contents (contd.) Order TRICHOPTERA 17 Family: Leptocertdae 17 Order LEPIDOPTERA 18 Family: Pyralidae 18 Order DIPTERA 19 Family: Culicidae 19 Tendipedidae 20 Heleidae 20 Stratlomytdae 21 Tabanidae 21 Muscidae 22 Control 23 Acknowledgements 24 References 25 Enlarged text figures 2.5. ~--~------------------------~---I Foreword The insects which constitute an important component oJ the littoral Jauna oJ aquatic ecosystems play a vital role in the trophic structure and Junctions oJ culturable water bodies. Their primary role as converters oJ plant materials into animal protein and consumers oJ organic wastes oJ the fisti habitat is of great signifzcance Jor the healthy growth of fish populations. Though the insects serve as a source oJ natural food. for fishes, they ofteti impair the fist: productivity in the pond ecosystem by predating upon their young ones. By sharing a common trophic niche with the fist: Juveniles they also compete with them Jor food.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Diapause: a Review
    Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology A 7 (2017) 456-475 doi: 10.17265/2161-6256/2017.07.002 D DAVID PUBLISHING Insect Diapause: A Review Harsimran Kaur Gill1, Gaurav Goyal2 and Gurminder Chahil3 1. Department of Entomology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA 2. Technical Agronomist, Monsanto, St. Louis, MO 63167, USA 3. Agriculture Extension Coordinator, Manitoba Agriculture, Swan River, MB R0L 0Z0, Canada Abstract: Diapause is defined as a period of suspended development in insects and other invertebrates during unfavorable environmental conditions. Diapause is commonly confused with term “quiescence” as both are dormant development stages. Here this paper aimed to review the research work done on different aspects of diapause. Attempt was made to explain definitions of diapause, incidence, stages and termination of diapause, genetic control, factors affecting diapauses, including temperature, photoperiod, moisture and food, etc.. Key words: Diapause, quiescence, diapauses theory, stages of diapauses, genetic control, biotic and abiotic factors, insects. 1. Introduction embryonic, larval, pupal or adult stages. For example, silkworm moth (Bombyx mori) overwinters in embryo Diapause is an important adaptation in many insect stage, just before segmentation. The gypsy moth species enabling them to sustain in regions which (Lymantia dispar) enters diapause as a fully formed would otherwise be unfavorable for permanent larva with hatching occurring immediately after habitation, and to maintain high numbers in an diapause ends. Obligate diapause is often universal, environment which might otherwise support only a resulting in strictly univoltine life cycle with every low population [1]. The term “diapause” was applied individual in every generation experiencing diapause, by Wheeler [2] to egg stage of grasshopper, irrespective of any possible environmental variations.
    [Show full text]
  • R. P. LANE (Department of Entomology), British Museum (Natural History), London SW7 the Diptera of Lundy Have Been Poorly Studied in the Past
    Swallow 3 Spotted Flytcatcher 28 *Jackdaw I Pied Flycatcher 5 Blue Tit I Dunnock 2 Wren 2 Meadow Pipit 10 Song Thrush 7 Pied Wagtail 4 Redwing 4 Woodchat Shrike 1 Blackbird 60 Red-backed Shrike 1 Stonechat 2 Starling 15 Redstart 7 Greenfinch 5 Black Redstart I Goldfinch 1 Robin I9 Linnet 8 Grasshopper Warbler 2 Chaffinch 47 Reed Warbler 1 House Sparrow 16 Sedge Warbler 14 *Jackdaw is new to the Lundy ringing list. RECOVERIES OF RINGED BIRDS Guillemot GM I9384 ringed 5.6.67 adult found dead Eastbourne 4.12.76. Guillemot GP 95566 ringed 29.6.73 pullus found dead Woolacombe, Devon 8.6.77 Starling XA 92903 ringed 20.8.76 found dead Werl, West Holtun, West Germany 7.10.77 Willow Warbler 836473 ringed 14.4.77 controlled Portland, Dorset 19.8.77 Linnet KC09559 ringed 20.9.76 controlled St Agnes, Scilly 20.4.77 RINGED STRANGERS ON LUNDY Manx Shearwater F.S 92490 ringed 4.9.74 pullus Skokholm, dead Lundy s. Light 13.5.77 Blackbird 3250.062 ringed 8.9.75 FG Eksel, Belgium, dead Lundy 16.1.77 Willow Warbler 993.086 ringed 19.4.76 adult Calf of Man controlled Lundy 6.4.77 THE DIPTERA (TWO-WINGED FLffiS) OF LUNDY ISLAND R. P. LANE (Department of Entomology), British Museum (Natural History), London SW7 The Diptera of Lundy have been poorly studied in the past. Therefore, it is hoped that the production of an annotated checklist, giving an indication of the habits and general distribution of the species recorded will encourage other entomologists to take an interest in the Diptera of Lundy.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017
    Washington Natural Heritage Program List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017 The following list of animals known from Washington is complete for resident and transient vertebrates and several groups of invertebrates, including odonates, branchipods, tiger beetles, butterflies, gastropods, freshwater bivalves and bumble bees. Some species from other groups are included, especially where there are conservation concerns. Among these are the Palouse giant earthworm, a few moths and some of our mayflies and grasshoppers. Currently 857 vertebrate and 1,100 invertebrate taxa are included. Conservation status, in the form of range-wide, national and state ranks are assigned to each taxon. Information on species range and distribution, number of individuals, population trends and threats is collected into a ranking form, analyzed, and used to assign ranks. Ranks are updated periodically, as new information is collected. We welcome new information for any species on our list. Common Name Scientific Name Class Global Rank State Rank State Status Federal Status Northwestern Salamander Ambystoma gracile Amphibia G5 S5 Long-toed Salamander Ambystoma macrodactylum Amphibia G5 S5 Tiger Salamander Ambystoma tigrinum Amphibia G5 S3 Ensatina Ensatina eschscholtzii Amphibia G5 S5 Dunn's Salamander Plethodon dunni Amphibia G4 S3 C Larch Mountain Salamander Plethodon larselli Amphibia G3 S3 S Van Dyke's Salamander Plethodon vandykei Amphibia G3 S3 C Western Red-backed Salamander Plethodon vehiculum Amphibia G5 S5 Rough-skinned Newt Taricha granulosa
    [Show full text]
  • F4 URS Protected Species Report 2012
    Homes and Communities Agency Northstowe Phase 2 Environmental Statement F4 URS Protected Species Report 2012 Page F4 | | Northstowe Protected Species Report July 2013 47062979 Prepared for: Homes and Communities Agency UNITED KINGDOM & IRELAND REVISION RECORD Rev Date Details Prepared by Reviewed by Approved by 2 December Version 2 Rachel Holmes Steve Muddiman Steve Muddiman 2012 Principal Associate Associate Environmental Ecologist Ecologist Consultant 4 January Version 4 Rachel Holmes Steve Muddiman Steve Muddiman 2013 Principal Associate Associate Environmental Ecologist Ecologist Consultant 5 July 2013 Version 5 Rachel Holmes Steve Muddiman Steve Muddiman Principal Associate Associate Environmental Ecologist Ecologist Consultant URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited St George’s House, 5 St George’s Road Wimbledon, London SW19 4DR United Kingdom PROTECTED SPECIES REPORT 2 2013 Limitations URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“URS”) has prepared this Report for the sole use of Homes and Communities Agency (“Client”) in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed (proposal dated 7th April and 23 rd July 2012). No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by URS. This Report is confidential and may not be disclosed by the Client nor relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of URS. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested and that such information is accurate. Information obtained by URS has not been independently verified by URS, unless otherwise stated in the Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (Pdf, 5.07
    THE HERPETOLOGICAL BULLETIN The Herpetological Bulletin is produced quarterly and publishes, in English, a range of articles concerned with herpetology. These include full-length papers, new methodologies, short communications, natural history notes and book reviews. Emphasis is placed on field studies, conservation, veterinary and behavioural aspects. Authors should read and adhere to the British Ecological Society’s Ethical Policy and Guidelines, a full version of which can be found at https://www.thebhs.org/info-advice/134-bhs-ethics-policy or The Herpetological Bulletin (2017), 141: 46- 18. All submissions are liable to assessment by the editorial board for ethical considerations, and publication may be refused on the recommendation of this committee. Contributors may therefore need to justify killing or the use of other animal procedures, if these have been involved in the execution of the work. Likewise, work that has involved the collection of endangered species or disturbance to their habitat(s) will require full justification. Articles reporting the results of experimental research, descriptions of new taxa, or taxonomic revisions should be submitted to The Herpetological Journal (see inside back cover for Editor’s address). Guidelines for Contributing Authors: 1. See the BHS website for a free download of the Bulletin showing Bulletin style. A template is available from the BHS website www.thebhs.org or on request from the Editor. 2. Contributions should be submitted by email to [email protected]. 3. Articles should be arranged in the following general order: Title Name(s) of authors(s) Address(es) of author(s) (please indicate corresponding author) Abstract (required for all full research articles - should not exceed 10% of total word length) Text acknowledgements References Appendices Footnotes should not be included.
    [Show full text]
  • Spongeweed-Synthesized Silver Nanoparticles Are Highly Effective
    Environ Sci Pollut Res (2016) 23:16671–16685 DOI 10.1007/s11356-016-6832-9 RESEARCH ARTICLE Eco-friendly drugs from the marine environment: spongeweed-synthesized silver nanoparticles are highly effective on Plasmodium falciparum and its vector Anopheles stephensi, with little non-target effects on predatory copepods Kadarkarai Murugan1,2 & Chellasamy Panneerselvam3 & Jayapal Subramaniam1 & Pari Madhiyazhagan1 & Jiang-Shiou Hwang4 & Lan Wang5 & Devakumar Dinesh1 & Udaiyan Suresh1 & Mathath Roni1 & Akon Higuchi6 & Marcello Nicoletti7 & Giovanni Benelli8,9 Received: 13 April 2016 /Accepted: 4 May 2016 /Published online: 16 May 2016 # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2016 Abstract Mosquitoes act as vectors of devastating pathogens (EDX), and X-ray diffraction (XRD). In mosquitocidal assays, and parasites, representing a key threat for millions of humans the 50 % lethal concentration (LC50)ofC. tomentosum extract and animals worldwide. The control of mosquito-borne dis- against Anopheles stephensi ranged from 255.1 (larva I) to eases is facing a number of crucial challenges, including the 487.1 ppm (pupa). LC50 of C. tomentosum-synthesized emergence of artemisinin and chloroquine resistance in AgNP ranged from 18.1 (larva I) to 40.7 ppm (pupa). In lab- Plasmodium parasites, as well as the presence of mosquito oratory, the predation efficiency of Mesocyclops aspericornis vectors resistant to synthetic and microbial pesticides. copepods against A. stephensi larvae was 81, 65, 17, and 9 % Therefore, eco-friendly tools are urgently required. Here, a (I, II, III, and IV instar, respectively). In AgNP contaminated synergic approach relying to nanotechnologies and biological environment, predation was not affected; 83, 66, 19, and 11 % control strategies is proposed.
    [Show full text]
  • The 17Th International Colloquium on Amphipoda
    Biodiversity Journal, 2017, 8 (2): 391–394 MONOGRAPH The 17th International Colloquium on Amphipoda Sabrina Lo Brutto1,2,*, Eugenia Schimmenti1 & Davide Iaciofano1 1Dept. STEBICEF, Section of Animal Biology, via Archirafi 18, Palermo, University of Palermo, Italy 2Museum of Zoology “Doderlein”, SIMUA, via Archirafi 16, University of Palermo, Italy *Corresponding author, email: [email protected] th th ABSTRACT The 17 International Colloquium on Amphipoda (17 ICA) has been organized by the University of Palermo (Sicily, Italy), and took place in Trapani, 4-7 September 2017. All the contributions have been published in the present monograph and include a wide range of topics. KEY WORDS International Colloquium on Amphipoda; ICA; Amphipoda. Received 30.04.2017; accepted 31.05.2017; printed 30.06.2017 Proceedings of the 17th International Colloquium on Amphipoda (17th ICA), September 4th-7th 2017, Trapani (Italy) The first International Colloquium on Amphi- Poland, Turkey, Norway, Brazil and Canada within poda was held in Verona in 1969, as a simple meet- the Scientific Committee: ing of specialists interested in the Systematics of Sabrina Lo Brutto (Coordinator) - University of Gammarus and Niphargus. Palermo, Italy Now, after 48 years, the Colloquium reached the Elvira De Matthaeis - University La Sapienza, 17th edition, held at the “Polo Territoriale della Italy Provincia di Trapani”, a site of the University of Felicita Scapini - University of Firenze, Italy Palermo, in Italy; and for the second time in Sicily Alberto Ugolini - University of Firenze, Italy (Lo Brutto et al., 2013). Maria Beatrice Scipione - Stazione Zoologica The Organizing and Scientific Committees were Anton Dohrn, Italy composed by people from different countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright © and Moral Rights for This Thesis Are Retained by the Author And/Or Other Copyright Owners
    Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", Canterbury Christ Church University, name of the University School or Department, PhD Thesis. Renita Danabalan PhD Ecology Mosquitoes of southern England and northern Wales: Identification, Ecology and Host selection. Table of Contents: Acknowledgements pages 1 Abstract pages 2 Chapter1: General Introduction Pages 3-26 1.1 History of Mosquito Systematics pages 4-11 1.1.1 Internal Systematics of the Subfamily Anophelinae pages 7-8 1.1.2 Internal Systematics of the Subfamily Culicinae pages 8-11 1.2 British Mosquitoes pages 12-20 1.2.1 Species List and Feeding Preferences pages 12-13 1.2.2 Distribution of British Mosquitoes pages 14-15 1.2.2.1 Distribution of the subfamily Culicinae in UK pages 14 1.2.2.2. Distribution of the genus Anopheles in UK pages 15 1.2.3 British Mosquito Species Complexes pages 15-20 1.2.3.1 The Anopheles maculipennis Species Complex pages
    [Show full text]
  • Diptera) of Finland
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 441: 37–46Checklist (2014) of the familes Chaoboridae, Dixidae, Thaumaleidae, Psychodidae... 37 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7532 CHECKLIST www.zookeys.org Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Checklist of the familes Chaoboridae, Dixidae, Thaumaleidae, Psychodidae and Ptychopteridae (Diptera) of Finland Jukka Salmela1, Lauri Paasivirta2, Gunnar M. Kvifte3 1 Metsähallitus, Natural Heritage Services, P.O. Box 8016, FI-96101 Rovaniemi, Finland 2 Ruuhikosken- katu 17 B 5, 24240 Salo, Finland 3 Department of Limnology, University of Kassel, Heinrich-Plett-Str. 40, 34132 Kassel-Oberzwehren, Germany Corresponding author: Jukka Salmela ([email protected]) Academic editor: J. Kahanpää | Received 17 March 2014 | Accepted 22 May 2014 | Published 19 September 2014 http://zoobank.org/87CA3FF8-F041-48E7-8981-40A10BACC998 Citation: Salmela J, Paasivirta L, Kvifte GM (2014) Checklist of the familes Chaoboridae, Dixidae, Thaumaleidae, Psychodidae and Ptychopteridae (Diptera) of Finland. In: Kahanpää J, Salmela J (Eds) Checklist of the Diptera of Finland. ZooKeys 441: 37–46. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.441.7532 Abstract A checklist of the families Chaoboridae, Dixidae, Thaumaleidae, Psychodidae and Ptychopteridae (Diptera) recorded from Finland is given. Four species, Dixella dyari Garret, 1924 (Dixidae), Threticus tridactilis (Kincaid, 1899), Panimerus albifacies (Tonnoir, 1919) and P. przhiboroi Wagner, 2005 (Psychodidae) are reported for the first time from Finland. Keywords Finland, Diptera, species list, biodiversity, faunistics Introduction Psychodidae or moth flies are an intermediately diverse family of nematocerous flies, comprising over 3000 species world-wide (Pape et al. 2011). Its taxonomy is still very unstable, and multiple conflicting classifications exist (Duckhouse 1987, Vaillant 1990, Ježek and van Harten 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Mosquitoes of the Maculipennis Complex in Northern Italy
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Mosquitoes of the Maculipennis complex in Northern Italy Mattia Calzolari1*, Rosanna Desiato2, Alessandro Albieri3, Veronica Bellavia2, Michela Bertola4, Paolo Bonilauri1, Emanuele Callegari1, Sabrina Canziani1, Davide Lelli1, Andrea Mosca5, Paolo Mulatti4, Simone Peletto2, Silvia Ravagnan4, Paolo Roberto5, Deborah Torri1, Marco Pombi6, Marco Di Luca7 & Fabrizio Montarsi4,6 The correct identifcation of mosquito vectors is often hampered by the presence of morphologically indiscernible sibling species. The Maculipennis complex is one of these groups that include both malaria vectors of primary importance and species of low/negligible epidemiological relevance, of which distribution data in Italy are outdated. Our study was aimed at providing an updated distribution of Maculipennis complex in Northern Italy through the sampling and morphological/ molecular identifcation of specimens from fve regions. The most abundant species was Anopheles messeae (2032), followed by Anopheles maculipennis s.s. (418), Anopheles atroparvus (28) and Anopheles melanoon (13). Taking advantage of ITS2 barcoding, we were able to fnely characterize tested mosquitoes, classifying all the Anopheles messeae specimens as Anopheles daciae, a taxon with debated rank to which we referred as species inquirenda (sp. inq.). The distribution of species was characterized by Ecological Niche Models (ENMs), fed by recorded points of presence. ENMs provided clues on the ecological preferences of the detected species, with An. daciae sp. inq. linked to stable breeding sites and An. maculipennis s.s. more associated to ephemeral breeding sites. We demonstrate that historical Anopheles malaria vectors are still present in Northern Italy. In early 1900, afer the incrimination of Anopheles mosquito as a malaria vector, malariologists made big attempts to solve the puzzling phenomenon of “Anophelism without malaria”, that is, the absence of malaria in areas with an abundant presence of mosquitoes that seemed to transmit the disease in other areas1.
    [Show full text]