Murray Rothbard's Philosophy of Freedom.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Murray Rothbard's Philosophy of Freedom.Pdf Murray Rothbard’s Philosophy of Freedom BY DAVID GORDON urray Rothbard (1926–1995) based his polit- viable alternative. A slave system in which slaves could ical philosophy on a simple insight: slavery is refuse to work, at the cost of not being supplied with Mwrong. Few, if any, would dare to challenge any provisions, would hardly strike us as much of an this obvious truth; but its implications are far reaching. improvement over simple slavery. It is Rothbard’s singular merit to show that rejecting And the income tax is far from the only area in slavery leads inexorably to laissez-faire capitalism, unre- which the state acts as a slave master. In the United stricted by the slightest govern- States, we do not now have a ment interference. compulsory draft. But the gov- If we reject slavery, then are we ernment in the past enacted not saying that each person owns conscription laws that directly his own body? Just what seems compelled people to serve in the immoral about slavery is that some armed forces, and may well enact people, the slave owners, have the such a law again. People serving right to control the bodies of those in the military must of course fol- under their domination.The own- low orders, even if doing so will ers can tell the slaves what to do end their lives. and force them to obey if they But once more, have we not refuse to comply. moved too fast? Measures such as One might at first think that the income tax and conscription, this point has little relevance to however much they interfere modern society. The Thirteenth with individual liberty, have been Amendment abolished slavery in enacted by democratically chosen the United States in 1865; surely it Murray Rothbard legislatures. How can we compare Mises Institute does not tell us very much of prac- a democracy with a system in tical importance today to reiterate that slavery is wrong. which a master compels others to labor, regardless of But are we not moving here too quickly? If the what they want? In a democracy, an individual may not essence of slavery is forced labor for others, it is a very be able to do what he wants, but the majority of the present reality today. When the government takes part people make the rules. of what you earn in taxes, it in effect forces you to labor Rothbard argues that this circumstance leaves the for the state. Just as the slave does not get to keep what essence of slavery unchanged. In a democracy, the major- he produces but must surrender it to the master, so must ity acts as the slave master. So long as the indi- the taxpayer give up part of what he makes to the gov- vidual cannot exercise full control over his own body, he ernment. One might object that someone can avoid David Gordon ([email protected]) is a senior fellow at the Ludwig von being taxed by refusing to work, but this is hardly a Mises Institute, which published his book, The Essential Rothbard (2007). 33 NOVEMBER 2007 David Gordon is to that extent a slave. The fact that he, along with his contending that the fact-value dichotomy of David fellow slaves, has a share in determining what he will do Hume and his many successors was an artificial con- still leaves him unfree. Democracy, in Rothbard’s view, is struction. Suppose, for example, that someone pushes a system in which each person owns a share of everyone you aside while you are waiting in line for a movie. Has else. It is merely a variant of slavery.The choice cannot be he not acted rudely? The judgment that he has acted evaded: one must either favor self-ownership or slavery. rudely is not a matter for subjective decision but is gov- In many books and countless articles, Rothbard car- erned by objective criteria. But surely “rude” is a value ried out his defense of self-ownership to its full logical, if term: what then has happened to the alleged dichotomy controversial, conclusion. If you own your own labor, you between fact and value? In the view favored by Roth- cannot be compelled against your will to support the bard and Strauss, value judgments are factual. If so, is it state, even if it confines its activities to protecting rights— not also true—though this is much more controver- other than, of course, the rights it violates by extorting sial—that if human beings need certain things in order resources through taxation. Further, people in a free soci- to flourish, this is at once a factual statement and a value ety are at liberty to establish competing agencies to pro- judgment? So, at any rate, Rothbard maintained. (I am tect themselves: they need not confine here offering only a sketch of his protection to a monopoly agency. Rothbard does argument, not a full defense of it.) So far the self-ownership principle Although his position is probably has been presented as an obvious truth indeed derive an a minority one among contemporary of common sense, but Rothbard was “ought” from an “is,” analytical philosophers, several lead- not content to leave matters at that. In ing lights support it. The influential arguing for self-ownership, Rothbard but he would deny British philosopher Philippa Foot relies heavily on a point of fact. Every- defends a view of the good quite one is in reality in control of his own that he is guilty of similar to Rothbard’s in her Natural will. If I obey another, I must always any fallacy. He Goodness (Oxford University Press, make the decision to do as he wishes; 2001). And even if, despite Roth- and the threat of violence on his part maintains that ethical bard’s urgings, one continues to should I follow my own course leaves principles follow from believe that an impassable gap sepa- the situation unchanged. I must decide rates fact and value, self-ownership whether to accede to the threat. the nature of man. remains a valid principle for anyone But, one might object, even if who rejects slavery. Rothbard is correct that one cannot alienate the will, how does he get to the conclusion he wants? From the Private Property fact that the will cannot be alienated, how does the eth- nce one accepts self-ownership the justification ical judgment follow that each person ought to be rec- Ofor private property soon follows. Each person ognized as a self-owner? Is Rothbard here committing owns his own labor. Does he not have a right, then, the fallacy of deriving an “ought” from an “is”? to what he produces by means of that labor? To deny To our imagined objector, Rothbard would demur. this is to revert once more to slavery; it is to say that He does indeed derive an “ought” from an “is,” but he other people have the right to control your labor. would deny that he is guilty of any fallacy. He maintains But once again, Rothbard must confront an objec- that ethical principles follow from the nature of man. tion: You may own your labor, but this does not suffice How is this claim about ethics, which defies much of to justify property rights. People, after all, do not create contemporary philosophical opinion, to be sustained? the land that they wish to appropriate. But this point Rothbard found persuasive an argument advanced by gives Rothbard little trouble. Land starts off originally Leo Strauss, a political philosopher with whom he was unowned. Parcels of land do not come into the world often at odds. Strauss appealed to ordinary language, with persons’ names attached; and Rothbard firmly THE FREEMAN: Ideas on Liberty 34 Murray Rothbard’s Philosophy of Freedom rejects the Georgist contention that everyone owns all We may imagine another objection at this point. land collectively. “Some critics,” he writes in his great Suppose Rothbard has successfully rebutted the con- treatise Man, Economy, and State, “especially the Henry tention of Georgists and others that first possessors of Georgists, assert that, while a man or his assigns may be land can in his system hold to ransom all others. Is not entitled to the produce of his own labor or anything the system, however logical, of no practical relevance? exchanged for it, he is not entitled to an original, Most property titles today do not stem by a clear line of nature-given factor, a ‘gift of nature.’ For one man to be transmission from a Lockean first owner. On the con- able to appropriate this gift is alleged to be an invasion trary,would we not find that many land titles go back to of a common heritage that all men deserve to use acts of violent dispossession? Would not an attempt to equally. This is a self-contradictory position, however. put Rothbard’s system into practice quickly lead to a A man cannot appropriate anything without the coop- war of conflicting claims to property? eration of original nature-given factors, if only as stand- As usual, Rothbard has thought of the objection ing room. Therefore, if property in land or other himself. He answers that the burden of proof lies on nature-given factors is to be denied man, he cannot someone who disputes a land title. If he cannot make obtain property in the fruits of his labor.” good his claim, the present possessor owns his land In Rothbard’s view, then, one acquires property legitimately. If land titles cannot be traced back to an through “mixing one’s labor” with unowned land, or original act of legitimate appropriation, speculation by acquiring such property in gift or about an original owner and his pres- exchange from someone else.
Recommended publications
  • All-Left.Net Alliance Aims to Be a Movement Journal for the Alliance Of
    all-left.net This Radical Reprint brought to you by: ALLiance Journal ALLiance Journal: a grassroots, shop-floor, dirt cheap, tabloid aspiring to inspire the Left-Libertarian Movement to delusions of grandeur. We are full of piss and passion; and we will never stop even in the face of singularity, peak oil or Ragnarok. Check us out at alliancejournal.net or libertyactivism.info. ALLiance aims to be a movement journal for the Alliance of the Libertarian Left (ALL). The Alliance of the Libertarian Left is a multi-tendency coalition of mutu- alists, agorists, voluntaryists, geolibertarians, left-Rothbardians, green libertarians, dialectical anarchists, radical minarchists, and others on the libertarian left, united by an opposition to statism and militarism, to cultural intolerance (including sexism, racism, and homophobia), and to the prevailing corporatist capitalism falsely called a free market; as Advocates of Freed Markets Should Embrace “Anti-Capitalism” well as by an emphasis on education, direct action, and building alterna- tive institutions, rather than on electoral politics, as our chief strategy Gary Chartier for achieving liberation. Radical Reprints The Conscience of an Anarchist, Studies in Mutualist Political Economy by C4SS Advisory Panel member Gary Chartier by C4SS writer and researcher Kevin A. Carson A compelling case for a stateless society. Anarchists tend to look embarrassed when the sub- ject of economics comes up. Or we mumble some- Anarchy happens when people organize their lives thing about Proudhon and then sheepishly borrow peacefully and voluntarily — without the aggres- ideas from Karl Marx.... A specifically anarchistic sive violence of the state. This simple but powerful approach to economic analysis has lain dormant for book explains why the state is illegitimate, unneces- the last 130 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Isabel Paterson, Rose Wilder Lane, and Zora Neale Hurston on War, Race, the State, and Liberty
    SUBSCRIBE NOW AND RECEIVE CRISIS AND LEVIATHAN* FREE! “The Independent Review does not accept “The Independent Review is pronouncements of government officials nor the excellent.” conventional wisdom at face value.” —GARY BECKER, Noble Laureate —JOHN R. MACARTHUR, Publisher, Harper’s in Economic Sciences Subscribe to The Independent Review and receive a free book of your choice* such as the 25th Anniversary Edition of Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government, by Founding Editor Robert Higgs. This quarterly journal, guided by co-editors Christopher J. Coyne, and Michael C. Munger, and Robert M. Whaples offers leading-edge insights on today’s most critical issues in economics, healthcare, education, law, history, political science, philosophy, and sociology. Thought-provoking and educational, The Independent Review is blazing the way toward informed debate! Student? Educator? Journalist? Business or civic leader? Engaged citizen? This journal is for YOU! *Order today for more FREE book options Perfect for students or anyone on the go! The Independent Review is available on mobile devices or tablets: iOS devices, Amazon Kindle Fire, or Android through Magzter. INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE, 100 SWAN WAY, OAKLAND, CA 94621 • 800-927-8733 • [email protected] PROMO CODE IRA1703 Isabel Paterson, Rose Wilder Lane, and Zora Neale Hurston on War, Race, the State, and Liberty ✦ DAVID T. BEITO AND LINDA ROYSTER BEITO he ideals of liberty, individualism, and self-reliance have rarely had more enthusiastic champions than Isabel Paterson, Rose Wilder Lane, and Zora TNeale Hurston. All three were out of step with the dominant worldview of their times. They had their peak professional years during the New Deal and World War II, when faith in big government was at high tide.
    [Show full text]
  • Markets Not Capitalism Explores the Gap Between Radically Freed Markets and the Capitalist-Controlled Markets That Prevail Today
    individualist anarchism against bosses, inequality, corporate power, and structural poverty Edited by Gary Chartier & Charles W. Johnson Individualist anarchists believe in mutual exchange, not economic privilege. They believe in freed markets, not capitalism. They defend a distinctive response to the challenges of ending global capitalism and achieving social justice: eliminate the political privileges that prop up capitalists. Massive concentrations of wealth, rigid economic hierarchies, and unsustainable modes of production are not the results of the market form, but of markets deformed and rigged by a network of state-secured controls and privileges to the business class. Markets Not Capitalism explores the gap between radically freed markets and the capitalist-controlled markets that prevail today. It explains how liberating market exchange from state capitalist privilege can abolish structural poverty, help working people take control over the conditions of their labor, and redistribute wealth and social power. Featuring discussions of socialism, capitalism, markets, ownership, labor struggle, grassroots privatization, intellectual property, health care, racism, sexism, and environmental issues, this unique collection brings together classic essays by Cleyre, and such contemporary innovators as Kevin Carson and Roderick Long. It introduces an eye-opening approach to radical social thought, rooted equally in libertarian socialism and market anarchism. “We on the left need a good shake to get us thinking, and these arguments for market anarchism do the job in lively and thoughtful fashion.” – Alexander Cockburn, editor and publisher, Counterpunch “Anarchy is not chaos; nor is it violence. This rich and provocative gathering of essays by anarchists past and present imagines society unburdened by state, markets un-warped by capitalism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Freeman April 1954
    1954 2r-'~f(f, The Great Tax Relief Hoax An Editorial Give the House A Treaty Vote Henry Hazlitt The Soviet Game at Geneva Boris Souvarine Freedom Needs Your Help! American freedom came into being through the actions of many working together for a cause. Today this freedom is being defended in the same manner. Get into the fight yourself by distributing FREEMAN reprints to opinion moulders in your community. They will influence the many! THE CHRISTIAN LEFT by Lawrence R. Brown THE RIGHTS AND WRONGS OF LABOR by Donald R. Richberg This discussion of the leftward trend in Christian thinking has ex­ A noted authority tackles the proposition: industrial peace in this ceptional importance. Removed from a concern with personalities country is impossible so long as the leaders of organized labor or denominations, it explains why many people today who can are unchecked in the power they wield over their fellow-men and truly be numbered among the faithful are promoting, consciously or in their war on private enterprise. A provocative and important unwittingly, the spread of the Communist conspiracy. article. ' Single copy .10: 12 copies $1.00: 100 copies $7.00: 1,000 copies Single copy .10: 12 copies $1.00: 100 copies $6.00: 1,000 copies '$60.00. Reprint #39 $45.00. Reprint #30 GIVE THE HOUSE A TRiEATY VOTE by Henry Hazlitt DENATIONALIZE ELECTRIC POWER by O. Glenn Saxon There is still a way to secure for the American people protection America's most decided advance toward collectivism to date has against treaty-made laws.
    [Show full text]
  • Nine Lives of Neoliberalism
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Plehwe, Dieter (Ed.); Slobodian, Quinn (Ed.); Mirowski, Philip (Ed.) Book — Published Version Nine Lives of Neoliberalism Provided in Cooperation with: WZB Berlin Social Science Center Suggested Citation: Plehwe, Dieter (Ed.); Slobodian, Quinn (Ed.); Mirowski, Philip (Ed.) (2020) : Nine Lives of Neoliberalism, ISBN 978-1-78873-255-0, Verso, London, New York, NY, https://www.versobooks.com/books/3075-nine-lives-of-neoliberalism This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/215796 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative
    [Show full text]
  • The Art of Seduction and Affect Economy: Neoliberal Class Struggle and Gender Politics in a Tokyo Host Club
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by KU ScholarWorks THE ART OF SEDUCTION AND AFFECT ECONOMY: NEOLIBERAL CLASS STRUGGLE AND GENDER POLITICS IN A TOKYO HOST CLUB BY AKIKO TAKEYAMA B.A., University of Oregon, 1999 M.A., University of Oregon, 2001 DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Anthropology in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2008 Urbana, Illinois Doctoral Committee: Associate Professor Karen Kelsky, Chair Professor Nancy Abelmann Associate Professor Martin F Manalansan IV Associate Professor Alejandro Lugo Associate Professor Brenda Farnell ABSTRACT My dissertation investigates the underground world of Japan’s increasingly popular host club scene, where mostly young, working-class men “sell” romance, love, and sometimes sex to indulge their female clients’ fantasy, often for exorbitant sums of money. I explore this commercialization of feelings, emotions, and romantic relationships — what I call ‘affect economy’— in the context of Japan’s recent socioeconomic restructuring, a reaction to globalization that is reshaping the nation’s labor and commodity forms. Based on ethnographic fieldwork I conducted in Tokyo between 2003 and 2005, I argue that selfhood, lifestyles, and social relationships have become commodifiable at the intersection of Japan’s postindustrial consumer culture and neoliberal globalization. My dissertation aims to provide a fine-grained ethnographic portrait of how hosts and their clients mutually seduce one another to foster a commodified form of romance whereby both sides seek alternative lives and cultivate their desirable selves —potentially successful entrepreneurial men and sexually attractive women—while it simultaneously underscores gender subordination, social inequality, and the exploitative nature of the affect economy in Japan.
    [Show full text]
  • National Review</Em>
    Linfield University DigitalCommons@Linfield Faculty Publications 2007 Editing Conservatism: How National Review Magazine Framed and Mobilized a Political Movement Susan Currie Sivek Linfield College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.linfield.edu/mscmfac_pubs Part of the Journalism Studies Commons, and the Social Influence and oliticalP Communication Commons DigitalCommons@Linfield Citation Sivek, Susan Currie, "Editing Conservatism: How National Review Magazine Framed and Mobilized a Political Movement" (2007). Faculty Publications. Accepted Version. Submission 4. https://digitalcommons.linfield.edu/mscmfac_pubs/4 This Accepted Version is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It is brought to you for free via open access, courtesy of DigitalCommons@Linfield, with permission from the rights-holder(s). Your use of this Accepted Version must comply with the Terms of Use for material posted in DigitalCommons@Linfield, or with other stated terms (such as a Creative Commons license) indicated in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, or if you have questions about permitted uses, please contact [email protected]. EDITING CONSERVATISM 1 Running head: EDITING CONSERVATISM Editing Conservatism: How National Review Magazine Framed and Mobilized a Political Movement Submitted to Mass Communication & Society Revised September 7, 2007 Abstract (100 words): This paper examines how National Review magazine helped to spark the 1960s American conservative movement through its particular framing of conservatism, and how the magazine has worked to sustain that influence even until today. Using research on frame alignment in social movements, the first issue of National Review is analyzed and placed in context with contemporaneous events and publications. The creation and editing of the magazine is found to parallel the creative and deliberate framing of the early conservative movement.
    [Show full text]
  • Market Anarchism As Constitutionalism Roderick T
    Chapter 9 Market Anarchism as Constitutionalism Roderick T. Long A legal system is any institution or set of institutions in a given society that provides dispute resolution in a systematic and reasonably predictable way. It does so through the exercise of three functions: the judicial, the legislative, and the executive. The judicial function, the adjudication of disputes, is the core of any legal system; the other two are ancillary to this. The legislative function is to determine the rules that will govern the process of adjudication (this function may be merged with the judicial function, as when case law arises through precedents, or it may be exercised separately), while the executive function is to secure submission (through a variety of means, which may or may not include violence) to the adjudicative process and compliance with its verdicts. A government or state (for present purposes I shall use these terms interchangeably) is any organisation that claims, and in large part achieves, a forcibly maintained monopoly, within a given geographical territory, of these legal functions, and in particular of the use of force in the executive function. Now the market anarchist objection to government is simply a logical extension of the standard libertarian objection to coercive monopolies in general.1 First, from a moral point of view, among people regarded as equals2 it cannot be legitimate for some to claim a certain line of work as their own privileged preserve from which others are to be forcibly excluded; we no longer believe in the divine right of kings, and on no other basis could such inequality of rights be justified.
    [Show full text]
  • The Freeman 1969
    Freemanthe VOL. 19, NO. 10 • OCTOBER 1969 The Libertarian Philosophy Benjamin A. Rogge 579 Dr. Rogge explains his points of departure from conservatives, modern liberals, and the New left. The Great Depression Hans F. Sennholz 585 A survey of four distinct phases of the "great depression," with reasons and understanding that may help to avert repetition. Socialized Airwaves Jerry Emanuelson 597 How the principles of private property might help to resolve a knotty problem. Gold's Dust Gary North 599 Gold may well collect dust when properly policing a nation's monetary policies. Read's Law Leonard E. Read 608 "No politician can fly higher in office than he flew while getting there." The Quiet Revolution Edmund A. Opitz 611 "In quietness and in trust shall be your strength." (Isaiah 30:15) In Doing 1l0ne's Own Thing" Henry Edward Simons 619 Radically creative, yes, but not radically destructive of traditional ways. Problem or Opportunity? Clarence B. Carson 622 When the garbage business is monopolized by government, how do we know whether a given item is a waste or a resource? The Anyones AI Siebert 629 A poetic plea for constructive differences among men. Problems the Free Market Can't Solve Paul L. Poirot 630 The organized demand of something for nothing is the kind of a problem for which there is no market solution. Book Reviews: 636 "Education in America" by George Charles Roche III "The Man from Monticello: (An Intim~te Ufe of Thomas Jefferson)" by Thomas Fleming Anyone wishing to communicate with authors may send first-class mail in care of THE FREEMAN for forwarding.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberty and Immigration by Thomas E
    Liberty And Immigration by Thomas E. Woods, Jr. for the Foundation for Economic Education The extraordinarily high rate of immigration, legal and illegal, into the United States is an indication that our country is doing something right. The United States, while far from boasting a pure free market, clearly offers enough economic liberty to attract the migration of peoples from all over the world. Currently, half the world's immigrants come to the United States. Libertarians have generally welcomed immigration, and on very simple grounds. According to the “non-aggression axiom,” it is wrong to aggress against the person or property of anyone who has not himself committed such aggression. To restrict the free movement of peoples across borders is thus to engage in unjustified aggression, and is therefore anathema. Upon further reflection, however, it is puzzling why so many libertarians have so enthusiastically and uncritically accepted the “open borders” position. It leads, in fact, to an infringement on the property rights of millions of homeowners, and a tremendous increase in state power. In a 1993 address before the Mont Pelerin Society, the late Murray N. Rothbard suggested an alternative libertarian approach to immigration. Imagine the pure private- property, or “anarcho-capitalist” model, in which all property, from streets to parks, is privately owned. There is no such thing as a “public space” under such an arrangement, and therefore no “immigration problem.” Individual property owners or contractual communities would be able to set their own immigration policy, and determine for themselves who would or would not be allowed to enter their private property.[1] The situation becomes muddied when we insert public property into the equation.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitalism and Morality ______
    Capitalism and Morality _________________________ “A CRITIQUE OF LIBERTARIAN JUSTICE” Marissa Smith Aristotle, perhaps the greatest human mind ever to ponder the actions and affairs of men, asked, “What is justice?” Similarly, Plato dedicated one of his most august works to the discovery of a comprehensive idea of justice. So paramount an issue, justice and the conceptions thereof definitively mark political systems and positions as well as many economic theories. While many consider tyranny the absence of justice and democracy the pinnacle, few explicitly agree on a comprehensive definition of that justice. Given the general disagreement and variation of position, distinct ideas of justice mark each democratic political position and are generally in accord with the basic principles held by that position. Of the political and economic positions, libertarianism subscribes to a conception of justice intrinsically interlaced with natural and negative rights, individualism and charitable interdependency, personal responsibility, and the limited, minimal state1. While holding individuals to high standards of personal behavior, the libertarian notion of justice is often criticized as both too economic and too individualized. As it is so individualized, such justice is often predisposed to moral relativism, particularly its notion of charity. Conclusively, libertarian justice is held as utopian. Of principle importance to the libertarian understanding of justice is an understanding of the libertarian notion of human flourishing or eudaimonia. One can be said to flourish or to self-perfect when he fully actualizes his potentials, talents, abilities, and virtues. This is not to say that man may become perfect in the same sense as God is perfect, but rather that he may fully actualize or perfect his abilities and potentials on earth.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fusionism of Frank S. Meyer Red Beginnings F
    Minchew 1 Adam Minchew 27 August 2010 Between Traditionalists and Libertarians: The Fusionism of Frank S. Meyer Red Beginnings Frank Strauss Meyer was born into a wealthy, Reformed Jewish household on 9 May 1909. Although little is known about his early years, Meyer suffered from chronic illness and spent much of his time confined to the indoors. Restricted as he was by his parents and his illnesses, Meyer found solace in intellectual pursuits and read voraciously. As a teenager, Meyer developed an interest in history and politics and apparently saw himself as a progressive; later in his life, Meyer admitted to hanging a poster of Woodrow Wilson on his bedroom door.1 Meyer attended private school at Newark Academy and through hard work, gained admission to Princeton University at the age of seventeen. Although intellectually precocious, continued to be dogged by sickness and left Princeton University permanently in 1928. Meyer’s parents, unsure of their son’s future, kept him at home to recover, but eventually decided in the summer of 1930 to send him to England to further his education, particularly in the disciplines in which he showed most interest: the classics, English literature, and economics.2 But the progressive, economically vibrant and hopeful decade of the 1920’s gave way to the Great Depression of the 1930s. World War I had transformed many nationalist, idealistic young people into mature skeptics and political activists. They sought to remake the world according to one or another ideology that would prevent another slaughter on a global scale. The most severe economic downturn in the history of the West prepared the way, however, for a global conflict that would dwarf World War I in bloodletting.
    [Show full text]