Metoo, Time's Up, and Theories of Justice
#METOO, TIME’S UP, AND THEORIES OF JUSTICE Lesley Wexler∗ Jennifer K. Robbennolt∗∗ Colleen Murphy∗∗∗ Allegations against movie mogul Harvey Weinstein and the ensuing #MeToo movement opened the floodgates to a modern-day reckoning with sex discrimination in the workplace. High-level and high-profile individu- als across industries have been fired, been suspended, or resigned, while others accused of wrongdoing have faced no consequences, gotten slaps on the wrists, or ascended to the highest levels of power. At the same time, serious concerns have been raised about useful processes by which nonprivileged women and men can address harassment, due process for those accused of misconduct, and the need for proportionate consequenc- es. And there have been calls for both restorative and transformative jus- tice in addressing this problem. But these calls have not been explicit about what sort of restoration or transformation is envisioned. This Article explores the meaning, utility, and complexities of re- storative justice and the insights of transitional justice for dealing with sexual misconduct in the workplace. We begin by documenting the restor- ative origins of #MeToo as well as exploring steps taken, most prominent- ly by Time’s Up, to amplify and credit survivors’ voices, seek accountabil- ity, change workplace practices, and encourage access to the legal system. We then take up the call for restorative justice by exploring its key components—including acknowledgement, responsibility-taking, harm re- pair, nonrepetition, and reintegration—with an eye toward how these ∗ Professor of Law, University of Illinois College of Law. ∗∗ Alice Curtis Campbell Professor of Law and Professor of Psychology, University of Illinois College of Law.
[Show full text]