Západočeská Univerzita V Plzni Fakulta Filozofická Disertační Práce

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Západočeská Univerzita V Plzni Fakulta Filozofická Disertační Práce Západočeská univerzita v Plzni Fakulta filozofická Disertační práce 2020 Dott.ssa Klára Preusz Západočeská univerzita v Plzni Fakulta filozofická Disertační práce Application of modern methods in landscape archaeology – case study Ager Castronovano Dott.ssa Klára Preusz Plzeň 2020 University of West Bohemia in Pilsen Faculty of Philosophy Doctoral thesis Application of modern methods in landscape archaeology – case study Ager Castronovano Dott.ssa Klára Preusz Pilsen 2020 University of West Bohemia in Pilsen Faculty of Philosophy Department of Archaeology Study program - Archaeology Field of study - Archaeology Doctoral thesis Application of modern methods in landscape archaeology – a case study Ager Castronovano Dott.ssa Klára Preusz Supervisor: Doc. PhDr. Pavel Vařeka, Ph.D. Department of Archaeology Faculty of Philosophy, University of West Bohemia in Pilsen Pilsen 2020 I have written this thesis on my own, and I indicated all the sources, wherefrom I drew information, as is required for a scientific work. Pilsen, April 30, 2020 .......................................... At this place, I would like to thank to the following persons: ... my Ph.D. supervisor doc. PhDr. Pavel Vařeka, Ph.D. for the opportunity to write my doctorate on UWB and focus on this interesting topic. ... colleagues from the Institute of Applied Informatics, the University of South Bohemia, for their support and for creating excellent working conditions for my study. ... PhDr. Kateřina Horníčková, Ph.D., for encouraging me to do a PhD., precious advice and important feedback. … doc. PhDr. Michal Šroněk, CSc. and doc. PhDr. Peter Pavúk, Ph.D. for their encouragement. ... my dear friends Bc. Eva Procházková and Johan Petrus Wilhelmus Verspay, M.A. for their valuable advice. ... the head of Castrum Novum research, director of the Museo del mare e della navigazione antica and dear friend Dott. Flavio Enei for his support and invaluable collaboration. ... Mariano, Mauro and Bruno for long walks in the Ager Castronovano landscape and to GATC members for their support and collaboration. … Dott.ssa Magda Vuono, Mgr. Petr Netolický, Ph.D. and Mgr. Jozef Chajbulin Koštial for helping me with the data collection. ... my husband Mgr. et Mgr. Michal Preusz, Ph.D. for endless inspiring talks and help with the data collection. … all dear friends for their support, inspiration and understanding. … and last but not least, I would like to thank my mother, father and sister for all the Sunday lunches I did not come to. 1 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 3 2 Objectives, theoretical framework and methods ................................................................. 5 2.1 Objectives ...................................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Theoretical framework of the thesis ............................................................................. 5 2.3 Methodology ................................................................................................................. 7 2.3.1 Analyses of historical maps ................................................................................... 7 2.3.2 Literary and archival research ............................................................................. 14 2.3.3 Lidar data analyses .............................................................................................. 15 2.3.4 Analyses of historical and contemporary aerial photographs ............................ 17 2.3.5 Field survey and the use of documentation methods ........................................ 17 2.3.6 Crowdsourcing .................................................................................................... 19 2.4 Archaeological data processing ................................................................................... 20 2.4.1 Thiessen polygons ............................................................................................... 20 2.4.2 Path distance ....................................................................................................... 21 2.4.3 Visibility ............................................................................................................... 21 2.4.4 Point density ....................................................................................................... 21 2.4.5 Kernel Density ..................................................................................................... 22 2.4.6 Multicriterial analysis .......................................................................................... 22 3 State of research in the area of the Santa Marinella municipality ..................................... 25 4 Castrum Novum (AC071)..................................................................................................... 27 4.1 The history of the site ................................................................................................. 27 4.2 From digging to archaeological research .................................................................... 30 4.3 Commercial contacts of Castrum Novum ................................................................... 35 5 Ager Castronovano .............................................................................................................. 36 5.1 Geomorphology .......................................................................................................... 36 5.2 Sea level change .......................................................................................................... 39 5.3 Environmental context ................................................................................................ 42 6 Catalogue ............................................................................................................................ 45 7 Archaeological dataset interpretations ............................................................................ 166 7.1 Settlement components - character and development ............................................ 168 7.1.1 Housing components ........................................................................................ 168 7.1.2 Residential components .................................................................................... 168 7.1.3 Production components .................................................................................... 171 7.1.4 Water management components ..................................................................... 174 7.1.5 Sacral components ............................................................................................ 177 7.1.6 Burial components ............................................................................................ 178 7.1.7 Infrastructure .................................................................................................... 181 2 7.1.8 Mining components .......................................................................................... 183 7.1.9 Modern military object ..................................................................................... 183 7.1.10 Others ................................................................................................................ 183 7.2 Ecosystem of the Ager Castronovano ....................................................................... 186 7.2.1 Environmental factors ....................................................................................... 186 7.2.2 Cultural factors .................................................................................................. 195 7.3 Formation of the cultural landscape and changing settlement pattern ................... 196 7.3.1 Palaeolithic, Mesolithic and Neolithic periods .................................................. 196 7.3.2 The Bronze Age ................................................................................................. 197 7.3.3 The Iron Age ...................................................................................................... 199 7.3.4 The Etruscan period .......................................................................................... 203 7.3.4.1 Landscapes of city-states .............................................................................. 205 7.3.4.2 Roman expansion into Etruscan territories .................................................. 208 7.3.4.3 Roman colonization ....................................................................................... 210 7.3.5 Roman Republican period ................................................................................. 210 7.3.6 Roman Imperial period ..................................................................................... 214 7.3.6.1 Production of principal crops in the Roman period ...................................... 217 7.3.6.2 The decline of Roman Imperial villas ............................................................ 219 7.3.7 Middle Ages ....................................................................................................... 219 7.3.8 Post-Medieval period ........................................................................................ 225 7.3.9 Modern period .................................................................................................. 228 8 Conclusion ........................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Warships of the First Punic War: an Archaeological Investigation
    WARSHIPS OF THE FIRST PUNIC WAR: AN ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION AND CONTRIBUTORY RECONSTRUCTION OF THE EGADI 10 WARSHIP FROM THE BATTLE OF THE EGADI ISLANDS (241 B.C.) by Mateusz Polakowski April, 2016 Director of Thesis: Dr. David J. Stewart Major Department: Program in Maritime Studies of the Department of History Oared warships dominated the Mediterranean from the Bronze Age down to the development of cannon. Purpose-built warships were specifically designed to withstand the stresses of ramming tactics and high intensity impacts. Propelled by the oars of skilled rowing crews, squadrons of these ships could work in unison to outmaneuver and attack enemy ships. In 241 B.C. off the northwestern coast of Sicily, a Roman fleet of fast ramming warships intercepted a Carthaginian warship convoy attempting to relieve Hamilcar Barca’s besieged troops atop Mount Eryx (modern day Erice). The ensuing naval battle led to the ultimate defeat of the Carthaginian forces and an end to the First Punic War (264–241 B.C.). Over the course of the past 12 years, the Egadi Islands Archaeological Site has been under investigation producing new insights into the warships that once patrolled the wine dark sea. The ongoing archaeological investigation has located Carthaginian helmets, hundreds of amphora, and 11 rams that sank during the course of the battle. This research uses the recovered Egadi 10 ram to attempt a conjectural reconstruction of a warship that took part in the battle. It analyzes historical accounts of naval engagements during the First Punic War in order to produce a narrative of warship innovation throughout the course of the war.
    [Show full text]
  • Hannibal Barca
    LESSONS IN LEADERSHIP – HANNIBAL BARCA Hannibal “I will either find a way or make one” Hannibal, General of the Carthaginian army, lived in the second and third century B.C. He was born into a Carthaginian military family and was made to swear by his father to forever be hostile towards Rome due to Carthage’s loss in the first Punic war. His father, Hamilcar Barca, was a Carthaginian General who fought in the first Punic war. Hamilcar commanded the Carthaginian land forces in Sicily from 247 BC to 241 BC, during the latter stages of the First Punic War. He kept his army intact and led a successful guerrilla war against the Romans in Sicily. Hamilcar retired to Carthage after the peace treaty in 241 BC, following the defeat of Carthage. During the Second Punic War, Hannibal swept across southern Europe, famously crossing the Alps where he consistently defeated the Roman army, but never taking the city itself. Hannibal won decisive victories against the Romans, the most famous being the battles of Trebia, Lake Trasimene, and Cannae resulting in Rome losing one-fifth of the entire population of male citizens over 17 years of age. Although the Romans had lost an enormous portion of men, they did not break and after years of careful tiptoeing against Hannibal regaining its strength Rome counterattacked, and Hannibal was forced to return to Carthage where he was defeated at the battle of Zama by his rival Scipio Africanus, consequently breaking Carthage’s will and ability to wage war. Following the Second Punic war, Hannibal worked for a time as a statesman before he was forced into exile by Rome.
    [Show full text]
  • The Italians in the Second Punic War: Local Conditions and the Failure of the Hannibalic Strategy in Italy
    THE ITALIANS IN THE SECOND PUNIC WAR: LOCAL CONDITIONS AND THE FAILURE OF THE HANNIBALIC STRATEGY IN ITALY DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Michael P. Fronda, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2003 Dissertation Committee: Approved By Dr. Nathan Rosenstein, Adviser Dr. Timothy Gregory ____________________________ Adviser Dr. Barry Strauss Department of History ABSTRACT Rome’s victory in the Second Punic War paved the way for its conquest of the Mediterranean. Yet that victory is bound up with Hannibal's failure in Italy, even though he brought Rome to its knees in the early stages of the war. Previous explanations for the failure of Hannibal's strategy have tended to stress either the hopelessness of this strategy, because of the loyalty of Rome's Italian allies and their willingness to be integrated into the Roman system, or the success of Rome's counter-strategy of attrition, aimed at limiting allied revolts while wearing down Hannibal's forces. Previous scholarship, however, neglects an important dimension of the question of the failure of Hannibal’s strategy; that is, Hannibal’s failure as a diplomat to win over large numbers of Rome’s Italian allies and thus overcome Rome’s long-term strategic advantages. This dissertation looks at the Second Punic War from the perspective of the Italian states in order to explain why Hannibal did not gain more Italian allies. The dissertation is divided into four regional case studies and brings to bear literary, archaeological, numismatic, epigraphic, and topographic evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded for Personal Non‐Commercial Research Or Study, Without Prior Permission Or Charge
    Magub, Alexandra (2018) Political and Religious Ideologies on Parthian Coins of the 2nd‐1st Centuries BC. PhD thesis. SOAS University of London. http://eprints.soas.ac.uk/30283 Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non‐commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. When referring to this thesis, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given e.g. AUTHOR (year of submission) "Full thesis title", name of the School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination. 1 Political and Religious Ideologies on Parthian Coins of the 2nd-1st Centuries BC ALEXANDRA MAGUB Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD 2018 Department of Religions and Philosophies, School of History, Religions and Philosophies SOAS, University of London 3 Brief Abstract This thesis examines a key period of change in Parthian coinage, as the rebellious Parthian satrapy transitioned first from a nomadic to sedentary kingdom in the second half of the 3rd century BC, and then into a great empire during the 2nd-early 1st century BC. The research will focus on the iconography and inscriptions that were employed on the coinage in order to demonstrate how Parthian authorities used these objects to convey political and religious ideologies to a diverse audience.
    [Show full text]
  • My Name Is Justin Rastinejad and I Am Currently a Junior Studying Chemical Engineering
    Hello everyone and welcome to UCMUN XXII !! My name is Justin Rastinejad and I am currently a junior studying chemical engineering. You may be wondering, what is this engineer doing in a political science environment? I believe it is important to be well-rounded and open to new perspectives. I participated in Model UN during my 4 years in high school, and 3 years in college. I attended the NHSMUN conference 3 of those high school years and have served as an assistant director for JCC and director for UNDP at UCMUN. I also participate in an outreach club called Engineering Ambassadors where we perform engineering demonstrations and presentations in front of K-12 students to inspire future engineers, specifically in demographics that are underrepresented, such as people of color and women. Additionally, I am in ChemE Car Club, in which we create a shoebox-sized car that runs and stops based on a chemical reaction we design and test in a lab. I also work in an undergraduate research laboratory where we are turning cooking waste (free fatty acids and triglycerides) into biofuels. I will be your director for JCC1, where we will be deciding the correct course of action to ensure a Carthaginian Victory in the 2nd Punic War, in 214 BCE. For those that do not know, Rome was not always the strongest empire in the Mediteranean. Before Rome gained its dominance, they fought three major wars, spanning over 100 years with a city named Carthage who resided on the northern shore of Africa. Back in high school, I did not hear anything about these wars until senior year, when my Latin teacher mentioned a story of elephants, snowy mountains, and military genius.
    [Show full text]
  • World History Chapter 4 Study Guide 4-1 300-200 B.C
    Name:________________________________________ Date:____________________ Period:__________ World History Chapter 4 Study Guide 4-1 300-200 B.C. Political History 1. Which century corresponds with the years 300-200 B.C.? 2. What Hellenistic kingdom in Asia Minor was ruled by the Attalid dynasty from 282 to 133 B.C.? 3. Who inhabited the British Isles and were the dominate culture by the 3rd century B.C.? 4. What war was fought between Epirus and the Roman Republic in southern Italy from 280 to 275 B.C., and resulted in a Roman victory and the assertion of Roman dominion over southern Italy? 5. What was a major political and cultural power in ancient Iran from 247 B.C. to 224 A.D.? 6. What war was fought between Ancient Carthage and the Roman Republic, the two great powers of the Western Mediterranean, from 264 to 241 B.C.? 7. What battle was fought off the coast of Sicily on March 10, 241 B.C. and was the final naval battle fought between the fleets of Carthage and the Roman Republic during the First Punic War? 8. Who was a Carthaginian general and statesman, and was the governor of Iberia from 237 to 229 B.C.? 9. Who was a Carthaginian military leader and politician, governor in Iberia after Hamilcar Barca’s death, and founder of Cartagena? 10. Who was a Carthaginian general and commander of the Carthaginian army when Rome declared war on Carthage in 218 B.C., and is considered to be one of the greatest military commanders in history? 11.
    [Show full text]
  • The Logistics of the Roman Army at War (264 B.C. - A.D
    THE LOGISTICS OF THE ROMAN ARMY AT WAR (264 B.C. - A.D. 235) JONATHAN P. ROTH BRILL THE LOGISTICS OF THE ROMAN ARMY AT WAR (264 B.C. - A.D. 235) COLUMBIA STUDIES IN THE CLASSICAL TRADITION under the direction of WILLIAM V. HARRIS (Editor) • PAUL OSKAR KRISTELLER EUGENE F. RICE, JR. • ALAN CAMERON JAMES A. COULTER • RICHARD BRILLIANT SUZANNE SAID VOLUME XXIII THE LOGISTICS OF THE ROMAN ARMY AT WAR (264 B.C. - A.D. 235) BY JONATHAN P. ROTH BRILL LEIDEN • BOSTON • KÖLN 1999 This book is printed on acid -free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Roth, Jonathan, 1955– The logistics of the Roman army at war (264 B.C.-A.D. 235) / by Jonathan P. Roth. p. cm. — (Columbia studies in the classical tradition, ISSN 0166-1302 ; v. 23) Includes bibliographical references and indexes. ISBN 9004112715 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Rome—Army—Supplies and stores. 2. Rome—Army– –Transportation—Equipment and supplies. 3. Logistics. 4. Rome– –History, Military—265-30 B.C. 5. Rome—History, Military—30 B.C.-476 A.D. I. Title. II. Series. DG89.R675 1998 355.4’11’0937—dc21 98–42368 CIP Die Deutsche Bibliothek - CIP-Einheitsaufnahme Roth, Jonathan P.: The logistics of the Roman army at war : (264 b.c. - a.d. 235) / by Jonathan P. Roth. – Leiden ; Boston ; Köln : Brill, 1998 (Columbia studies in the classical tradition ; Vol. 23) ISBN 90–04–11271–5 ISSN 0166-1302 ISBN 90 04 11271 5 © Copyright 1999 by The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Academic Year and Commencement 2016–17
    NOTA BENE Vol. 22 No. 1 NEWS FROM THE HARVARD DEPARTMENT OF THE CLASSICS Academic Year 2016–17 Notes from the Chair by Mark Schiefsky As we come to the end of another academic year I am delighted to report that the study of Classics continues to thrive at Harvard. This year Alexander Riehle joined the faculty ranks as Assistant Professor of Byzantine Language and Literature. Our concentrator numbers remain steady in the face of strong headwinds and national trends, and last fall we welcomed a sizable new cohort of graduate students into our various Ph.D. programs. As always, the calendar was packed with invited lectures, workshops, and conferences on all manner of topics connected with the ancient Greco-Roman world. Highlights of the year included the Spring Break study tour of Sicily for students enrolled in Classical Studies 112, which was led by the course instructors, Professors Emma Dench and Paul Kosmin. I invite you to read more about all these activities in the pages that follow. This is a time to celebrate the achievements of our graduates, but also to reflect on what we have lost over the past year. When Albert Henrichs, the Eliot Professor of Greek Literature, passed away on Easter Sunday after a brave struggle with an extended illness, the Department lost a cherished colleague and friend. For over forty years, Professor Henrichs made crucial contributions to scholarship in ancient Greek literature and religion, and to the Department’s intellectual, pedagogical, and social life. Thanks to the dedication of Professor Kathleen Coleman, Ivy Livingston, and some seventy-six of his colleagues and friends, we were able to present him with an anthology of brief scholarly contributions written in his honor just before his death.
    [Show full text]
  • Hannibal Barca: for Carthage: the Right Man for the Wrong Time Michael Mccabe
    The Histories Volume 10 | Issue 1 Article 3 2019 Hannibal Barca: For Carthage: The Right Man for the Wrong Time Michael McCabe Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/the_histories Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation McCabe, Michael (2019) "Hannibal Barca: For Carthage: The Right Man for the Wrong Time," The Histories: Vol. 10 : Iss. 1 , Article 3. Available at: https://digitalcommons.lasalle.edu/the_histories/vol10/iss1/3 This Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Scholarship at La Salle University Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in The iH stories by an authorized editor of La Salle University Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Histones, Volume 10, Number 1 60 I Hannibal Barca: For Carthage: The Right Man for the Wrong Time By Michael McCabe A familiar expression in the late 20th century reminds Americans that if Germany won the Second World War we all would be speaking German; a much less common thought is that if Carthage won the Second Punic War we would be speaking a derivative of Phoenician, not Latin. How close was Rome, the superior military force in all of antiquity, to being defeated? The answer is very close. Rome’s survival was a mixture of an adaptation of usual Roman tactics to face a superior foe and a bit of luck. Rome had met her match in Carthage; however, to say that the Second Punic War was Carthage’s war would be giving undue credit to the capital city.
    [Show full text]
  • The Beast Structure the Third Beast Kings of The
    THE BEAST STRUCTURE By Marie Casale Copyright © 1913 THE THIRD BEAST KINGS OF THE NORTH AND SOUTH DANIEL 11:1-20 Note: The prophecy of Dan 11 was given to Daniel in the first year of Darius the Mede King of Persia which was also the first year of Cyrus his nephew or grandson. The prophecy first foretells of four later kings in Persia. Xerxes the Great who reigned from 519 to 465 BC, was the fourth King who tried to conquer all of Greece. Dan 11:1 Also I in the first year of Darius the Mede, [even] I, stood to confirm and to strengthen him. Dan 11:2 And now will I shew thee the truth. Behold, there shall stand up yet three kings in Persia; and the fourth shall be far richer than [they] all: and by his strength through his riches he shall stir up all against the realm of Grecia. The next two verses foretell the rise of Alexander the Great’s Greek Kingdom following the Kingdom of Persia and how his kingdom would be broken into four divisions upon his death. Dan 11:3 And a mighty king shall stand up, that shall rule with great dominion, and do according to his will. Dan 11:4 And when he shall stand up, his kingdom shall be broken, and shall be divided toward the four winds of heaven; and not to his posterity, nor according to his dominion which he ruled: for his kingdom shall be plucked up, even for others beside those. Dan 11:5-20 concerns only two of those four divisions of Alexander's kingdom, the Ptolemaic Dynasty in Egypt, called King of the South, because it was south of Jerusalem, and the Seleucid Dynasty in Syria, called King of the North, because it was north of Judea.
    [Show full text]