DOCSLIB.ORG

American Cinema Since 1961

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
American Cinema Since 1961 AESTHETICS OF HOLLYWOOD CINEMA Syllabus COURSE DESCRIPTION Hollywood makes the most widely successful pleasure-giving artworks the world has ever known. The American film industry works on the assumption that pleasurable aesthetic experiences, among huge populations, translate into box office success. With that goal in mind, Hollywood has systematized the delivery of aesthetic pleasure, packaging and selling it on a massive scale. This course studies the chief attraction of Hollywood cinema worldwide: its entertainment value. We will examine a range of films that span Hollywood history in order to understand American commercial cinema’s aesthetic design. Many people dismiss Hollywood cinema as mere entertainment and leave it at that. In this course, we will explore how Hollywood creates, for massive numbers of people, some of their most exhilarating experiences of art. TEXTBOOK Todd Berliner, Hollywood Aesthetic: Pleasure in American Cinema (New York: Oxford University Press, 2017). The book is available in print and as an e-book; the e-book includes direct links to film clips. PART I: INTRODUCTION TO HOLLYWOOD AESTHETICS Week 1 Screening: City Lights (1931, 87 min., Charles Chaplin) Reading: Hollywood Aesthetic, Preface and Introduction (pp. ix-11) Week 2 Screening: His Girl Friday (1940, 92 min, Howard Hawks) Reading: Hollywood Aesthetic, Chapter 1 (pp. 13-32) Week 3 Screening: Double Indemnity (1944, 107 min., Billy Wilder) Reading: Hollywood Aesthetic, Chapter 2 (pp. 33-47) Additional films: Speedy (1928), Psycho (1960) PART II: NARRATIVE Week 4 Screening: The Big Sleep (1946, 114 min, Howard Hawks) Reading: Hollywood Aesthetic, Chapter 3 (pp. 49-71) Week 5 Screening: Red River (1948, 127 min, Howard Hawks) Reading: Hollywood Aesthetic, Chapter 4 (pp. 73-81) Additional films: Citizen Kane (1941), And Then There Were None (1945), The Killing (1956), Vertigo (1958), The Sixth Sense (1999), Mulholland Drive (2001) PART III: STYLE Week 6 Screening: Frankenstein (1931, 71 min., James Whale) Reading: Hollywood Aesthetic, Chapter 5 (pp. 83-100) Week 7 Screening: Leave Her to Heaven (1945, 110 min, John M. Stahl) Reading: Hollywood Aesthetic, Chapter 5 (pp. 100-113) Page 1 of 2 Week 8 Screening: Raging Bull (1980, 129 min, Martin Scorsese) Reading: Hollywood Aesthetic, Chapter 6 (pp. 115-129) Additional films: Sunrise (1927), Tarzan and His Mate (1934), Touch of Evil (1958), North by Northwest (1959), The Godfather (1971), Taxi Driver (1976), Brazil (1985), Do the Right Thing (1989), Goodfellas (1990), Clueless (1995), Stranger than Fiction (2006), Chi-Raq (2015) PART IV: IDEOLOGY Week 9 Screening: Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1956, 80 min, Don Siegel) Reading: Hollywood Aesthetic, Chapter 7 (pp. 131-155) Week 10 Screening: The Asphalt Jungle (1950, 112 min., John Huston) Reading: Hollywood Aesthetic, Chapter 8 (pp. 157-168) Week 11 Screening: Starship Troopers (1997, 129 min., Paul Verhoeven) Reading: Hollywood Aesthetic, Chapter 9 (pp. 169-182) Additional films: Casablanca (1942), Detour (1945), White Heat (1949), Pickup on South Street (1953), Die Hard (1988), The Last Temptation o f Christ (1988), The Dark Knight (2008) PART V: GENRE Week 12 Screening: Star Wars (1977, 121 min., George Lucas) Reading: Hollywood Aesthetic, Chapter 10 (pp. 183-201) Week 13 Screening: Singin’ in the Rain (1952, 103 min., Stanley Donen & Gene Kelly) Reading: Hollywood Aesthetic, Chapter 11 (pp. 203-218) Week 14 Screening: Unforgiven (1992, 131 min., Clint Eastwood) Reading: Hollywood Aesthetic, Chapter 12 (pp. 219-236) Additional films: The Jazz Singer (1927), Hallelujah! (1929), Cimarron (1931), Love Me Tonight (1932), Top Hat (1935), The Big Broadcast of 1938 (1938), Union Pacific (1939), The Wizard of Oz (1939), Stagecoach (1939), Winchester ’73 (1950), The Searchers (1956), Little Big Man (1970), Bugsy Malone (1976), All That Jazz (1979), Rocky III (1982), Everyone Says I Love You (1996), Gosford Park (2001) PART VI: PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER NARRATIVE • STYLE • IDEOLOGY • GENRE Week 15 Screening: Get Out (2017, 104 min, Jordan Peele) Reading: Hollywood Aesthetic, Conclusion (pp. 237-240) Page 2 of 2 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The-Wall-Street-Bookie.Pdf
    Introduction Options trading firm blows up amid natural gas volatility (source: FT) One millennial options trader was killing it, then Facebook cost him $180,000 ​(source: MarketWatch) Trader says he has “no money at risk,” then promptly loses almost 2,000% ​(source: MarketWatch) The headlines above are some of the reasons why financial advisors recommend that their clients stay away from options. Heck, for the majority of my trading career, I dabbled with them, with almost NO success. However, that all changed once I decided to switch my approach. Instead of buying like the sucker… like those folks who play slot machines at the casino… I began taking the other side— in turn, becoming the HOUSE. The casino strategy that I also call Weekly Windfalls puts you in the driver’s seat, as ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ you’ll learn after reading this eBook. After reading it, you’ll learn: ● How to easily position yourself for success on a week-to-week basis utilizing the casino strategy. Even if you’ve never placed a single option trade in your life ​ ​ ​ ​ before. ● The No. 1 reason why traders fail at options trading. And how a switch in ​ mindset can turn you from ready to give up to consistently profitable. ​ ​ ​ ● How to stack the odds in your favor. Why put on a trade with one possible way to ​ win when you can have THREE? ● The ultimate set it and forget it strategy. Decision fatigue is a real thing. I’ll teach ​ ​ ​ you how to take the stress out of options trading. WALL​ST ​ BOOKIE ​JASON BOND ​2 ● How to profit in any market condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Complaint Against Trevor R. Milton
    Case 1:21-cv-06445 Document 1 Filed 07/29/21 Page 1 of 65 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------x : UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND : EXCHANGE COMMISSION, : : Plaintiff, : : Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-6445 v. : : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED TREVOR R. MILTON, : : Defendant. : : ---------------------------------------------------------------x COMPLAINT Plaintiff United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), for its Complaint against Defendant Trevor R. Milton (“Milton”), alleges as follows: SUMMARY 1. Trevor R. Milton, the founder, largest stockholder, and former Chief Executive Officer and Executive Chairman of Nikola Corporation (“Nikola”), a publicly traded company, engaged in a fraudulent scheme to deceive retail investors about Nikola’s products, technical advancements, and commercial prospects for his own personal benefit in violation of the federal securities laws. Milton did so primarily by leveraging his social media presence and frequent appearances on television and podcasts to flood the market with false and misleading information about Nikola. 2. Milton founded Nikola in 2015 with the primary goals of manufacturing semi- trucks that run on alternative fuels with low or zero emissions and building an alternative fuel station infrastructure to support those vehicles. To accomplish these goals, Nikola needed to Case 1:21-cv-06445 Document 1 Filed 07/29/21 Page 2 of 65 raise billions of dollars to develop vehicles and infrastructure that had never before been developed or adopted on a commercial scale. Over the course of several private offerings, and then in connection with a business combination with a special purpose acquisition company (“SPAC”), Nikola raised more than $1 billion dollars, most of it from institutional investors.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Evolving Authorship, Developing Contexts: 'Life Lessons'
    Notes 1 Evolving Authorship, Developing Contexts: ‘Life Lessons’ 1. This trajectory finds its seminal outlining in Caughie (1981a), being variously replicated in, for example, Lapsley and Westlake (1988: 105–28), Stoddart (1995), Crofts (1998), Gerstner (2003), Staiger (2003) and Wexman (2003). 2. Compare the oft-quoted words of Sarris: ‘The art of the cinema … is not so much what as how …. Auteur criticism is a reaction against sociological criticism that enthroned the what against the how …. The whole point of a meaningful style is that it unifies the what and the how into a personal state- ment’ (1968: 36). 3. For a fuller discussion of the conception of film authorship here described, see Grist (2000: 1–9). 4. While for this book New Hollywood Cinema properly refers only to this phase of filmmaking, the term has been used by some to designate ‘either something diametrically opposed to’ such filmmaking, ‘or some- thing inclusive of but much larger than it’ (Smith, M. 1998: 11). For the most influential alternative position regarding what he calls ‘the New Hollywood’, see Schatz (1993). For further discussion of the debates sur- rounding New Hollywood Cinema, see Kramer (1998), King (2002), Neale (2006) and King (2007). 5. ‘Star image’ is a concept coined by Richard Dyer in relation to film stars, but it can be extended to other filmmaking personnel. To wit: ‘A star image is made out of media texts that can be grouped together as promotion, publicity, films and commentaries/criticism’ (1979: 68). 6. See, for example, Grant (2000), or the conception of ‘post-auteurism’ out- lined and critically demonstrated in Verhoeven (2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Book on Martin Scorsese, and January Screenings, in Conjunction with Scorsese Exhibition
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE MUSEUM OF THE MOVING IMAGE ANNOUNCES PUBLICATION OF ‘REVERSE SHOT’ BOOK ON MARTIN SCORSESE, AND JANUARY SCREENINGS, IN CONJUNCTION WITH SCORSESE EXHIBITION Martin Scorsese: He Is Cinema, a Reverse Shot/Museum of the Moving Image monograph with essays on every major Scorsese film, is celebrated with January 29 book signing January 15–April 23, 2017 Astoria, New York, January 11, 2017—In conjunction with Martin Scorsese, a major exhibition devoted to the director’s life, work, and love of cinema, currently on view in its galleries through April 23, and a comprehensive retrospective featuring all of Scorsese’s films, Museum of the Moving Image has published a book in partnership with its online publication, Reverse Shot. Martin Scorsese: He Is Cinema (2017), featuring essays on every Scorsese film by regular contributors to the magazine, was edited by Michael Koresky and Jeff Reichert, co-founders and co-editors of Reverse Shot. To celebrate its publication, the Museum will host a book signing on Sunday, January 29, after a screening of Raging Bull. The book is available exclusively in the Museum shop ($20). Most of the essays were originally published in earlier versions on Reverse Shot for a symposium on Martin Scorsese (available online), but new essays have been commissioned for the book, which also features a foreward by Chief Curator David Schwartz and an introduction by Koresky and Reichert. Chapters include Ashley Clark and Imogen Sara Smith on Taxi Driver, Jordan Cronk on Mean Streets, Eric Hynes on Gangs of New York, Koresky on After Hours and Raging Bull, Aliza Ma on Shutter Island, Adam Nayman on Goodfellas and Silence, Max Nelson on New York, New York, Nick Pinkerton on The King of Comedy, Reichert on Italianamerican and The Wolf of Wall Street, Genevieve Yue on Hugo, and many more.
    [Show full text]
  • 300 Greatest Films 4 Black Copy
    The goal in this compilation was to determine film history's definitive creme de la creme. The titles considered to be the greatest of the great from around the world and throughout the history of film. So, after an in-depth analysis of respected critics and publications from around the globe, cross-referenced and tweaked to arrive at the ranking of films representing, we believe, the greatest cinema can offer. Browse, contemplate, and enjoy. Check off all the films you have seen 1 Citizen Kane 1941 USA 26 The 400 Blows 1959 France 51 Au Hasard Balthazar 1966 France 76 L.A. Confidential 1997 USA 2 Vertigo 1958 USA 27 Satantango 1994 Hungary 52 Andrei Rublev 1966 USSR 77 Modern Times 1936 USA 3 2001: A Space Odyssey 1968 UK 28 Raging Bull 1980 USA 53 All About Eve 1950 USA 78 Mr Hulot's Holiday 1952 France 4 The Rules of the Game 1939 France 29 L'Atalante 1934 France 54 Sunset Boulevard 1950 USA 79 Wings of Desire 1978 France 5 Seven Samurai 1954 Japan 30 Annie Hall 1977 USA 55 The Turin Horse 2011 Hungary 80 Ikiru 1952 Japan 6 The Godfather 1972 USA 31 Persona 1966 Sweden 56 Jules and Jim 1962 France 81 The Apartment 1960 USA 7 Apocalypse Now 1979 USA 32 Man With a Movie Camera 1929 USSR 57 Double Indemnity 1944 USA 82 Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie 1972 France 8 Tokyo Story 1953 Japan 33 E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial 1982 USA 58 Contempt (Le Mepris) 1963 France 83 The Seventh Seal 1957 Sweden 9 Taxi Driver 1976 USA 34 Star Wars Episode IV 1977 USA 59 Belle De Jour 1967 France 84 Wild Strawberries 1957 Sweden 10 Casablanca 1942 USA 35
    [Show full text]
  • Hollywood Costume: 60 Films/60 Days November 29, 2013 – January 31, 2014
    COMMUNICATIONS & MARKETING VIRGINIA MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS 200 N. Boulevard I Richmond, Virginia 23220-4007 www.vmfa.museum/pressroom I T 804.204.2704 Hollywood Costume: 60 Films/60 Days November 29, 2013 – January 31, 2014 60 Films/60 Days will showcase 60 movie titles selected from the exhibition throughout 60 days. Mondays – Thursdays: 1 p.m.; Fridays: 6:30 p.m. and Saturdays at 1:30 & Sundays: 1 p.m. Tickets are available at: https://reservations.vmfa.museum/state/Info.aspx?EventID=51 Friday Screenings November 29: The Dark Knight Rises (2012) Christian Bale takes it up another notch in the latest of the iconic and visually stunning Batman series. December 13: The Matrix (1999) The movie that has defined a generation featuring computer hackers, mysterious rebels, virtual reality, and the controllers. December 20: The Blues Brothers (1980) Rollicking flick with rousing R&B/Soul/Rock music, Belushi and Aykroyd, and the car chase to end all car chases. December 27: Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) The first and fleetest of the wildly successful Spielberg series featuring archeologist and adventurer Indiana Jones. January 3: Valley of the Dolls (1968) A campy, cult relic about three actresses’ rise and fall in the cruel world of prescription drugs, sex, love, and show business. January 10: The Twilight Saga: New Moon (2009) They’re young; they’re hip; they’re vampires (and werewolves) in paranormal relationships. January 17: Dreamgirls (2006) Based on the hit Broadway musical, a Supremes-like trio of female soul singers conquer the pop charts in the 1960s.
    [Show full text]
  • Raging Bull: a Story of Physical and Psychological Self-Destruction in Boxing
    American Journal of Sports Science 2020; 8(4): 81-88 http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/ajss doi: 10.11648/j.ajss.20200804.11 ISSN: 2330-8559 (Print); ISSN: 2330-8540 (Online) Raging Bull: A Story of Physical and Psychological Self-destruction in Boxing Arturo Leyva 1, 2 1Department of Teaching and Learning, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, The United States 2Department of Philosophy, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, The United States Email address: To cite this article: Arturo Leyva. Raging Bull: A Story of Physical and Psychological Self-destruction in Boxing. American Journal of Sports Science. Vol. 8, No. 4, 2020, pp. 81-88. doi: 10.11648/j.ajss.20200804.11 Received : August 12, 2020; Accepted : October 5, 2020; Published : October 26, 2020 Abstract: This paper proposes a new reading of Martin Scorsese’s 1980 film Raging Bull. It departs from established academic interpretations that focus on the main protagonist, the former middleweight champion, Jake LaMotta, and his toxic or overtly violent masculinity. Instead, while such interpretations touch upon important aspects of the film, the common claim by philosophy of film scholars that theirs is the only valid reading of Scorsese’s work is dubious. Arguing against elitist interpretations that border on calls for prohibition of the film, this contribution presents a new approach to Raging Bull. It is informed by sociological and ethnographic accounts from the US-American boxing milieu in the 20th century. This approach makes it necessary to ground an interpretation of Raging Bull in the actual circumstances of boxing in the United States where two views on the urban gym in social hot spots have been established.
    [Show full text]
  • Motion Picture Association of America, Inc
    MOTION PICTURE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. Memorandum in Opposition to New York Assembly Bill A.8155B (Morelle, Right of Publicity) June 8, 2018 The Motion Picture Association of America, Inc. (“MPAA”) and its member companies1 oppose A.8155B (the “Bill”) as amended on June 5, 2018. Regrettably, the latest version of the Bill would restrict the ability of our members to tell stories about and inspired by real people and events. Such restriction is simply not permitted—not by the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, not by Section 8 of the New York Constitution, and not by decades of well- settled case law in New York and around the nation in which courts have barred right of publicity and similar claims in the context of motion pictures, television shows, and other expressive works. We respectfully urge members of the Legislature to vote no on final passage. The MPAA’s member studios are the major producers and distributors of motion pictures and television programs in the U.S. Many of these movies and television programs tell stories about, or inspired by, real people and events; Citizen Kane, Spotlight, Knute Rockne, All American; The Hurt Locker, Snowden, Ray, Jackie, Raging Bull, The Social Network, Hidden Figures, Frost/Nixon, A Beautiful Mind, and The Help are but a few examples in this genre. Filmmakers have the right under the First Amendment and existing New York case law to tell these stories, whether or not they have obtained consent from their subjects. It is thus critical that the Legislature not interfere with this right, including through amendments to N.Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Hollywood's New Yorker
    Introduction Martin Scorsese and Film Culture IN MARCH 2007 THREE VETERAN filmmakers of the New Hollywood, Francis Ford Coppola, George Lucas, and Steven Spielberg, came to the stage of the Academy Awards to present the award for Best Director. The moment this occurred, it became obvious to anyone in the know who the announced winner would be. Martin Scorsese was the prohibitive favorite, a veteran of American cinema who had been nominated five times previously without a victory. Like the three presenters, Scorsese was a director associated with the New Hollywood of the 1970s. Further‑ more, he was widely regarded as the greatest of that generation and as arguably the best of all living American filmmakers. It became clear that the Oscar ceremony was carefully staged theater. Typically, the previous year’s winner presents the award. In this case, it would have been Ang Lee, the winner in 2005 for Brokeback Mountain. The Academy decided to break with this tradition and have Coppola, Lucas, and Spielberg announce the winner. Scorsese was thus finally inducted into the Hollywood “inside” with his fellow New Hollywood directors. Scorsese’s acceptance speech tell‑ ingly made reference to the importance of film preservation and protect‑ ing Hollywood’s great tradition. Scorsese was both placing himself in this tradition while referencing his own work as a cultural historian. Even as he was accepting this symbol of middlebrow respectability, Scorsese attempted to remind his audience that his true passion was not his own filmmaking but the whole of film culture. As much as possible, Scorsese worked to mitigate the move to the mainstream of Hollywood produc‑ tion, a move signaled shortly before his Oscar win by his signing of a major production deal with Paramount studio, the first such production deal Scorsese had in several years.
    [Show full text]
  • LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT Guild Lifetime Achievement Awards Celebrate the Remarkable Careers of Feature, Television, News, and Sports Directors
    LIFETIME ACHIEVEMENT Guild Lifetime Achievement Awards celebrate the remarkable careers of feature, television, news, and sports directors. Here are some of them creating their unique body of work. CALLING THE SHOTS: (above) Mike Nichols (left) directs Dustin Hoffman at Los Angeles International Airport for the mood-setting opening sequence of The Graduate (1967). Nichols, who received the Lifetime Achievement Award in 2004, wanted to use popular songs instead of a traditional musical score to establish tone. (opposite) Kathleen Gallant is kidnapped by fugitives in Henry King’s revenge Western, The Bravados (1958). King, who received his Lifetime Achievement Award in 1956, was known for literary adaptations. He was a contract director at Fox from 1930-1961. 66 dga quarterly PHOTOS: (ABOVE) 20TH CENTURY FOX/EVERETT COLLECTION; (OPPOSITE) EVERETT COLLECTION dga quarterly 67 ON THE ROPES: When 2006 Lifetime Achievement Award recipient Clint Eastwood cast Hilary HAPPY HOUR: James Burrows (right), recipient of the inaugural Lifetime Achievement in Swank (left) in the boxing drama Million Dollar Baby (2004), he had confidence in her acting, Television Award in 2015, offers closing words of advice to his four leads in the final episode of but concerns over her small physique. To prepare her for the role, Eastwood put her through Will & Grace (1998-2006). From pilot to finale, Burrows directed every episode of the series over an intense workout regimen. “She was like a feather. But she had this great work ethic.” eight seasons. “I had a great time on Will & Grace. That’s why I did it. It made me laugh every week.” ADMAN: Joe Pytka, directing a spot with George Foreman, will be receiving a FOUL PLAY: Macbeth meets feudal Japan in Akira Kurosawa’s Throne of Blood THE HORROR: 2000 Lifetime Achievement Award recipient Steven Spielberg MEAN STREETS: 1993 Lifetime Achievement Award recipient Sidney Lumet (right) Lifetime Achievement in Television Award in 2016 for his groundbreaking work (1957), one of three Shakespearean adaptations he directed.
    [Show full text]
  • AFI Top 100 Films Rank Title Call Number(S) 1 Citizen Kane 33031 2
    AFI Top 100 Films Rank Title Call number(s) 1 Citizen Kane 33031 2 Casablanca 29274, 36061 3 Godfather, The 33325 4 Gone with the wind 31403, 38925, 47377 5 Lawrence of Arabia 31374, 36801 6 Wizard of Oz, The 29675, 42265 7 Graduate, The 29652, 44876 8 On the waterfront 33643 9 Schindler's list 37021, 44983 10 Singin' in the rain 29097, 40658, 34674 11 It's a wonderful life 29658 12 Sunset Boulevard 38038 13 Bridge on the River Kwai, The 30207 14 Some like it hot 32549, 45612 15 Star Wars (1977) 38627, 43853 16 All about Eve 30386, 36046 17 African Queen 26383 (vhs only) 18 Psycho 31124 19 Chinatown 32085, 46209 20 One flew over the cuckoo's nest 31423, 34678, 42136 21 Grapes of wrath, The 42135, 37251, 46921 22 2001: a space odyssey 30302, 43455, 46520 23 Maltese falcon, The 32512, 44460, 46046 24 Raging bull 29667, 39125 25 E.T. The extra-terrestrial 34802 26 Dr. Strangelove 29648, 31316, 32945, 38786 27 Bonnie & Clyde 31594, 47655 28 Apocalypse now 30201, 33503, 45147 29 Mr. Smith goes to Washington 32109, 45302 30 Treasure of the Sierra Madre 36624 31 Annie Hall 29472 32 Godfather part II, The 33326 33 High noon 29655, 34805 34 To kill a mockingbird 30303, 40875 35 It happened one night 30674, 45302 36 Midnight cowboy 29663, 42256 37 Best years of our lives 32175 38 Double indemnity 31142, 43421 39 Doctor Zhivago 33547 40 North by Northwest 31332, 38381 41 West side story 29099, 35908 42 Rear window 31125 43 King Kong (1933) 41365 44 Birth of a nation, The 32177, 37457 45 Streetcar named Desire 31422, 43295, 43949 46 Clockwork orange,
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Six Key Light—Film Acting There Are a Number of Important
    Chapter Six Key Light—Film Acting There are a number of important points to keep in mind about acting in film: a film performance is not a performance in the conventional sense because it is done in fits and starts, bits and pieces, usually out of sequence. Beyond dialogue, film acting is dependent on the gaze—the ways in which characters look or do not look at one another or at objects. There seem to be a set number of facial expressions and ways of holding the body that instantly communicate emotional states. A few actors are responsive to one director, giving that director their best performance. Robert De Niro, for example, did his best work with Martin Scorsese, in films such as Taxi Driver (1976) and Raging Bull (1980). His later work without Scorsese—especially those films in which he attempts a comic performance—are not very good. Meet the Fockers (Jay Roach, 2004) is not a memorable film or a stellar job of acting on De Niro’s part. It is not that De Niro can’t do comedy. Scorsese’s The Kind of Comedy (1982) proves that he can take the psychopathic character of Travis Bickle from Taxi Driver and turn it upside down for comic effect. John Wayne, an actor who has moved from his role in films to become a cultural icon long after his death, is another case in point. Wayne was not a very good actor unless he was being directed by John Ford, which he was in more than twenty films, or by Howard Hawks, for whom he made three.
    [Show full text]