DOCSLIB.ORG

Biodiversity Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Biodiversity Management Plan THE AMBATOVY NICKEL PROJECT (AMSA/DMSA) SPECIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT PLAN PROJECT PHASE: CONSTRUCTION DATE : MARCH 2007 Page i of 63 THE AMBATOVY NICKEL PROJECT (AMSA/DMSA) SPECIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE 1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 1 1.1 THE BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE (BMP-C) .............................................................................................................1 1.1.1 Biodiversity off-set zones.................................................................................2 1.1.2 BMP-C Structure and Design ..........................................................................3 1.2 ESTABLISH BMP CONSERVATION PRIORITIES ........................................................4 1.3 SETTING SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL BOUNDARIES...................................................7 1.4 PROJECT BIODIVERSITY POLICY ...............................................................................8 2 FLORA...................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 GENERAL .......................................................................................................................9 2.1.1 Mitigation measures.........................................................................................9 2.1.2 Monitoring ........................................................................................................9 2.2 MINE................................................................................................................................9 2.2.1 Priority Habitats................................................................................................9 2.2.2 Pre-construction studies and priority species ..................................................9 2.2.3 Mitigation measures.......................................................................................10 2.2.4 Monitoring ......................................................................................................11 2.3 ANKERA OFF-SITE CONSERVATION AREA..............................................................12 2.3.1 Pre-construction studies ................................................................................12 2.3.2 Protection.......................................................................................................13 2.3.3 Monitoring ......................................................................................................13 2.4 SLURRY PIPELINE.......................................................................................................13 2.4.1 Pre-construction studies ................................................................................13 2.4.2 Mitigation measures.......................................................................................13 2.4.3 Monitoring ......................................................................................................14 2.5 PROCESS PLANT ........................................................................................................15 2.5.1 Pre-construction studies ................................................................................15 2.5.2 Mitigation measures.......................................................................................15 2.5.3 Monitoring ......................................................................................................15 2.6 TAILINGS FACILITY .....................................................................................................15 2.6.1 Pre-construction Studies................................................................................15 2.6.2 Mitigation measures.......................................................................................16 2.6.3 Monitoring ......................................................................................................16 2.7 PORT EXPANSION.......................................................................................................16 2.7.1 Pre-construction Studies................................................................................16 2.7.2 Mitigation measures.......................................................................................16 2.7.3 Monitoring ......................................................................................................17 3 TERRESTRIAL FAUNA ...........................................................................................18 3.1 GENERAL .....................................................................................................................18 3.1.1 Mitigation measures.......................................................................................18 3.1.2 Monitoring ......................................................................................................18 3.2 MINE..............................................................................................................................18 3.2.1 Priority species...............................................................................................18 3.2.2 Pre-construction studies ................................................................................24 3.2.3 Mitigation measures.......................................................................................26 3.2.4 Monitoring ......................................................................................................29 3.3 ANKERA OFFSITE CONSERVATION AREA...............................................................31 Page ii of 63 THE AMBATOVY NICKEL PROJECT (AMSA/DMSA) SPECIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 3.3.1 Pre-construction studies ................................................................................31 3.3.2 Mitigation measures.......................................................................................31 3.3.3 Monitoring ......................................................................................................31 3.4 SLURRY PIPELINE.......................................................................................................32 3.4.1 Priority Species ..............................................................................................32 3.4.2 Pre-construction studies ................................................................................33 3.4.3 Mitigation measures.......................................................................................34 3.4.4 Monitoring ......................................................................................................35 3.5 PROCESS PLANT ........................................................................................................35 3.5.1 Pre-construction studies ................................................................................36 3.5.2 Mitigation measures.......................................................................................36 3.5.3 Monitoring ......................................................................................................37 3.6 TAILINGS FACILITY .....................................................................................................37 3.6.1 Priority species...............................................................................................37 3.6.2 Pre-construction Studies................................................................................37 3.6.3 Mitigation measures.......................................................................................37 3.6.4 Monitoring ......................................................................................................38 3.7 PORT EXTENSION.......................................................................................................39 3.7.1 Pre-construction Studies................................................................................39 3.7.2 Mitigation measures.......................................................................................39 3.7.3 Monitoring ......................................................................................................39 4 FISH AND AQUATIC HABITATS.............................................................................40 4.1 GENERAL .....................................................................................................................40 4.1.1 Mitigation measures.......................................................................................40 4.1.2 Monitoring ......................................................................................................40 4.2 MINE..............................................................................................................................40 4.2.1 Priority species...............................................................................................40 4.2.2 Pre-construction studies ................................................................................41 4.2.3 Mitigation measures.......................................................................................42 4.2.4 Monitoring ......................................................................................................46 4.3 OFFSITE CONSERVATION AREAS ............................................................................47
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Blumgart Et Al 2017- Herpetological Survey Nosy Komba
    Journal of Natural History ISSN: 0022-2933 (Print) 1464-5262 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tnah20 Herpetological diversity across intact and modified habitats of Nosy Komba Island, Madagascar Dan Blumgart, Julia Dolhem & Christopher J. Raxworthy To cite this article: Dan Blumgart, Julia Dolhem & Christopher J. Raxworthy (2017): Herpetological diversity across intact and modified habitats of Nosy Komba Island, Madagascar, Journal of Natural History, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2017.1287312 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2017.1287312 Published online: 28 Feb 2017. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 23 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tnah20 Download by: [BBSRC] Date: 21 March 2017, At: 02:56 JOURNAL OF NATURAL HISTORY, 2017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2017.1287312 Herpetological diversity across intact and modified habitats of Nosy Komba Island, Madagascar Dan Blumgart a, Julia Dolhema and Christopher J. Raxworthyb aMadagascar Research and Conservation Institute, BP 270, Hellville, Nosy Be, Madagascar; bDivision of Vertebrate Zoology, American, Museum of Natural History, New York, NY, USA ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY A six month herpetological survey was undertaken between March Received 16 August 2016 and September 2015 on Nosy Komba, an island off of the north- Accepted 17 January 2017 west coast of mainland Madagascar which has undergone con- KEYWORDS fi siderable anthropogenic modi cation. A total of 14 species were Herpetofauna; conservation; found that have not been previously recorded on Nosy Komba, Madagascar; Nosy Komba; bringing the total island diversity to 52 (41 reptiles and 11 frogs).
    [Show full text]
  • A Molecular Phylogeny of the Lamprophiidae Fitzinger (Serpentes, Caenophidia)
    Zootaxa 1945: 51–66 (2008) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2008 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Dissecting the major African snake radiation: a molecular phylogeny of the Lamprophiidae Fitzinger (Serpentes, Caenophidia) NICOLAS VIDAL1,10, WILLIAM R. BRANCH2, OLIVIER S.G. PAUWELS3,4, S. BLAIR HEDGES5, DONALD G. BROADLEY6, MICHAEL WINK7, CORINNE CRUAUD8, ULRICH JOGER9 & ZOLTÁN TAMÁS NAGY3 1UMR 7138, Systématique, Evolution, Adaptation, Département Systématique et Evolution, C. P. 26, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 43 Rue Cuvier, Paris 75005, France. E-mail: [email protected] 2Bayworld, P.O. Box 13147, Humewood 6013, South Africa. E-mail: [email protected] 3 Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences, Rue Vautier 29, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected] 4Smithsonian Institution, Center for Conservation Education and Sustainability, B.P. 48, Gamba, Gabon. 5Department of Biology, 208 Mueller Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802-5301 USA. E-mail: [email protected] 6Biodiversity Foundation for Africa, P.O. Box FM 730, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe. E-mail: [email protected] 7 Institute of Pharmacy and Molecular Biotechnology, University of Heidelberg, INF 364, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] 8Centre national de séquençage, Genoscope, 2 rue Gaston-Crémieux, CP5706, 91057 Evry cedex, France. E-mail: www.genoscope.fr 9Staatliches Naturhistorisches Museum, Pockelsstr. 10, 38106 Braunschweig, Germany. E-mail: [email protected] 10Corresponding author Abstract The Elapoidea includes the Elapidae and a large (~60 genera, 280 sp.) and mostly African (including Madagascar) radia- tion termed Lamprophiidae by Vidal et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological Characters of the Immature Stages of Henotesia Narcissus
    224 Nachr. entomol. Ver. Apollo, N. F. 23 (4): 225–236 (2003) 225 Morphological characters of the immature stages of Henotesia narcissus (Fabricius, 1798): description and phylogenetic significance (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae, Satyrinae, Satyrini, Mycalesina)1 Peter H. Roos Dr. Peter H. Roos, Goethestrasse 1a, D-45549 Sprockhövel, Germany; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Development and morphological characters of mathematisch adäquat durch eine Exponentialfunktion the immature stages of Henotesia narcissus (Fabricius, 1798) beschrieben werden. Ähnliche Funktionen können zur from Madagascar were studied. The aims were to find phy- Charakterisierung des Längenwachstums des Körpers sowie logenetically relevant characters to analyze the systematic der Zunahme der Stemmatadurchmesser benutzt werden. relationships of the subtribe Mycalesina within the Satyrini Durch einfache Kalkulationen können einzelne Larvalsta- and to find criteria for distinction of the larval stages. Clear dien identifiziert werden, wodurch die Vorausetzung für synapomorphies have been found for Mycalesina and the vergleichende morphologische Studien geschaffen ist. subtribe Ypthimina in the larval stages such as clubbed setae and thoracic dorsal trichome fields in the last instar larvae. Thus, the close relationship between the Mycalesina and Introduction the Lethina/Elymniina as proposed by Miller (1968) is not The order Lepidoptera includes an estimated number confirmed by our results. Our conclusion is supported by fur- of about 1.4 million species (Gaston 1991, Simon 1996). ther common characters of the Mycalesina and Ypthimina which, however, cannot be easily interpreted in phylogenetic For many, if not most of the known species often nothing terms. Such characters which are not shared by the Lethina more than some characters of the wing pattern have and Elymniina are for example the shape of the scoli present been published which may allow the identification of on the head capsule in all larval instars, the enlargement the species in the mature stage.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancestral Reconstruction of Diet and Fang Condition in the Lamprophiidae: Implications for the Evolution of Venom Systems in Snakes
    Journal of Herpetology, Vol. 55, No. 1, 1–10, 2021 Copyright 2021 Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Ancestral Reconstruction of Diet and Fang Condition in the Lamprophiidae: Implications for the Evolution of Venom Systems in Snakes 1,2 1 1 HIRAL NAIK, MIMMIE M. KGADITSE, AND GRAHAM J. ALEXANDER 1School of Animal, Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. PO Wits, 2050, Gauteng, South Africa ABSTRACT.—The Colubroidea includes all venomous and some nonvenomous snakes, many of which have extraordinary dental morphology and functional capabilities. It has been proposed that the ancestral condition of the Colubroidea is venomous with tubular fangs. The venom system includes the production of venomous secretions by labial glands in the mouth and usually includes fangs for effective delivery of venom. Despite significant research on the evolution of the venom system in snakes, limited research exists on the driving forces for different fang and dental morphology at a broader phylogenetic scale. We assessed the patterns of fang and dental condition in the Lamprophiidae, a speciose family of advanced snakes within the Colubroidea, and we related fang and dental condition to diet. The Lamprophiidae is the only snake family that includes front-fanged, rear-fanged, and fangless species. We produced an ancestral reconstruction for the family and investigated the pattern of diet and fangs within the clade. We concluded that the ancestral lamprophiid was most likely rear-fanged and that the shift in dental morphology was associated with changes in diet. This pattern indicates that fang loss, and probably venom loss, has occurred multiple times within the Lamprophiidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the Indicator Properties of Species Assemblages for Natural Areas Monitoring Author(S): Claire Kremen Source: Ecological Applications, Vol
    Assessing the Indicator Properties of Species Assemblages for Natural Areas Monitoring Author(s): Claire Kremen Source: Ecological Applications, Vol. 2, No. 2 (May, 1992), pp. 203-217 Published by: Ecological Society of America Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1941776 . Accessed: 07/02/2014 15:50 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Ecological Society of America is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Ecological Applications. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.32.85.74 on Fri, 7 Feb 2014 15:50:07 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Ecological Applications,2(2), 1992, pp. 203-217 ? 1992 by the Ecological Society of America ASSESSING THE INDICATOR PROPERTIES OF SPECIES ASSEMBLAGES FOR NATURAL AREAS MONITORING' CLAIRE KREMEN Centerfor Conservation Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305 USA Abstract. The diversityof organismsand complexityof ecosystemsprevent thorough inventoryand monitoringof protectedareas, yet sound databases are needed to manage ecosystems for long-termpersistence. One strategyis thereforeto focus monitoringon indicatororganisms, but guidelinesare lackingfor selecting appropriate species or groups. This paper presentsa simple protocolbased on ordinationtechniques for establishing the indicatorproperties of a group of organismsand forselecting an indicatorspecies subset formore intensivemonitoring.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Egg Size and Shape Evolve with Ecology but Not Developmental Rate Samuel H
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1302-4 Insect egg size and shape evolve with ecology but not developmental rate Samuel H. Church1,4*, Seth Donoughe1,3,4, Bruno A. S. de Medeiros1 & Cassandra G. Extavour1,2* Over the course of evolution, organism size has diversified markedly. Changes in size are thought to have occurred because of developmental, morphological and/or ecological pressures. To perform phylogenetic tests of the potential effects of these pressures, here we generated a dataset of more than ten thousand descriptions of insect eggs, and combined these with genetic and life-history datasets. We show that, across eight orders of magnitude of variation in egg volume, the relationship between size and shape itself evolves, such that previously predicted global patterns of scaling do not adequately explain the diversity in egg shapes. We show that egg size is not correlated with developmental rate and that, for many insects, egg size is not correlated with adult body size. Instead, we find that the evolution of parasitoidism and aquatic oviposition help to explain the diversification in the size and shape of insect eggs. Our study suggests that where eggs are laid, rather than universal allometric constants, underlies the evolution of insect egg size and shape. Size is a fundamental factor in many biological processes. The size of an 526 families and every currently described extant hexapod order24 organism may affect interactions both with other organisms and with (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 1). We combined this dataset with the environment1,2, it scales with features of morphology and physi- backbone hexapod phylogenies25,26 that we enriched to include taxa ology3, and larger animals often have higher fitness4.
    [Show full text]
  • Snake Venom in Context: Neglected Clades and Concepts Timothy Jackson, Hadrien Jouanne, Nicolas Vidal
    Snake Venom in Context: Neglected Clades and Concepts Timothy Jackson, Hadrien Jouanne, Nicolas Vidal To cite this version: Timothy Jackson, Hadrien Jouanne, Nicolas Vidal. Snake Venom in Context: Neglected Clades and Concepts. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, Frontiers Media S.A, 2019, 7, pp.332. 10.3389/fevo.2019.00332. hal-02297078 HAL Id: hal-02297078 https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-02297078 Submitted on 25 Sep 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. PERSPECTIVE published: 06 September 2019 doi: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00332 Snake Venom in Context: Neglected Clades and Concepts Timothy N. W. Jackson 1*†, Hadrien Jouanne 2 and Nicolas Vidal 2*† 1 Australian Venom Research Unit, Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 2 Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle, UMR 7205, MNHN, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, Université des Antilles, Institut de Systématique, Evolution et Biodiversité, Paris, France Despite the fact that venom is an intrinsically ecological trait, the ecological perspective has been widely neglected in toxinological research. This neglect has hindered our understanding of the evolution of venom by causing us to ignore the interactions which shape this evolution, interactions that take place between venomous snakes and their prey and predators, as well as among conspecific venomous snakes within populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural History and Taxonomic Notes On
    Herpetological Conservation and Biology 9(2):406–416. Submitted: 27 March 2014; Accepted: 25 May 2014; Published: 12 October 2014. NATURAL HISTORY AND TAXONOMIC NOTES ON LIOPHOLIDOPHIS GRANDIDIERI MOCQUARD, AN UPLAND RAIN FOREST SNAKE FROM MADAGASCAR (SERPENTES: LAMPROPHIIDAE: PSEUDOXYRHOPHIINAE) JOHN E. CADLE1, 2 1Centre ValBio, B.P. 33, 312 Ranomafana-Ifanadiana, Madagascar 2Department of Herpetology, California Academy of Sciences, Golden Gate Park, San Francisco, California 94118, USA, e-mail: [email protected] Abstract.––Few observations on living specimens of the Malagasy snake Liopholidophis grandidieri Mocquard have been previously reported. New field observations and specimens from Ranomafana National Park amplify knowledge of the natural history of this species. Liopholidophis grandidieri is known from above 1200 m elevation in pristine rain forests with a high diversity of hardwoods and bamboo. In some areas of occurrence, the forests are of short stature (15–18 m) as a result of lying atop well-drained boulder fields with a thin soil layer. Dietary data show that this species consumes relatively small mantellid and microhylid frogs obtained on the ground or in phytotelms close to the ground. A female collected in late December contained four oviductal eggs with leathery shells. One specimen formed a rigid, loose set of coils and body loops, and hid the head as presumed defensive behaviors; otherwise, all individuals were complacent when handled and showed no tendency to bite. I describe coloration and present photographs of living specimens from Ranomafana National Park. The ventral colors of L. grandidieri were recently said to be aposematic, but I discuss other plausible alternatives. Key Words.––conservation; diet; habitat; reproduction; snakes; systematics exhibits the greatest sexual dimorphism in tail length and INTRODUCTION the greatest reported relative tail length of any snake (tails average 18% longer than body length in males; The natural history and systematics of many snake Cadle 2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny of European Butterflies V1.0
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/844175; this version posted November 16, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. A complete time-calibrated multi-gene phylogeny of the European butterflies Martin Wiemers1,2*, Nicolas Chazot3,4,5, Christopher W. Wheat6, Oliver Schweiger2, Niklas Wahlberg3 1Senckenberg Deutsches Entomologisches Institut, Eberswalder Straße 90, 15374 Müncheberg, Germany 2UFZ – Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Department of Community Ecology, Theodor- Lieser-Str. 4, 06120 Halle, Germany 3Department of Biology, Lund University, 22362 Lund, Sweden 4Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Box 461, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden. 5Gothenburg Global Biodiversity Centre, Box 461, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden. 6Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm, Sweden *corresponding author: e-mail: [email protected] Abstract With the aim of supporting ecological analyses in butterflies, the third most species-rich superfamily of Lepidoptera, this paper presents the first time-calibrated phylogeny of all 496 extant butterfly species in Europe, including 18 very localized endemics for which no public DNA sequences had been available previously. It is based on a concatenated alignment of the mitochondrial gene COI and up to 11 nuclear gene fragments, using Bayesian inference of phylogeny. To avoid analytical biases that could result from our region-focus sampling, our European tree was grafted upon a global genus- level backbone butterfly phylogeny for analyses. In addition to a consensus tree, we provide the posterior distribution of trees and the fully-concatenated alignment for future analyses.
    [Show full text]
  • Madagascar, November 2018
    Tropical Birding Trip Report MADAGASCAR, NOVEMBER 2018 Madagascar: The Eighth Continent 16th November – 2nd December, 2018 Western endemics extension 12-16 November, 2018 Helmet Vanga extension 2-6 December, 2018 TOUR LEADER: Charley Hesse. Assistant TLs Crammy Wanyama & Emma Juxon. Report by Charley Hesse. Photos by Charley Hesse unless otherwise stated. All photos were taken on this tour. The ground- rollers are an endemic family to Madagascar. Pictured here is Short-legged Ground-Roller. www.tropicalbirding.com +1-409-515-9110 [email protected] Tropical Birding Trip Report MADAGASCAR, NOVEMBER 2018 This year’s Tropical Birding Madagascar Set-Departure tour was another resounding success. For the folks that joined both extensions, we explored far-flung corners of the 8th continent, from the Spiny Forest in the Southeast, to the mangroves of the Northwest and the towering rainforest of the Northeast. The endemic birds are a big feature of this tour, and we saw the vast majority of them, including all the vangas, all the mesites, all the ground- rollers (several of which placed in the bird of the trip), cuckoo-roller and all the Malagasy warblers possible on this itinerary. This is way more than just a birding tour though, and even the most hardcore birders ae charmed by the other amazing wildlife of this unique place. Lemurs go without saying (and we saw an impressive 28 species), but Lesser Streaked Tenrec and Ring-tailed Vontsira (a type of Malagasy carnivore) were up there with Indri to top the mammals of the trip. Tropical Birding is particularly strong on other animal groups too and we identified a staggering 50 reptile species, 20 frogs, almost 50 butterflies and over 30 reef fish! This is a very popular time of year for birding groups to visit Madagascar, but our long history of tours here meant that we secured the very best local guides at each location and our wonderful ground agent secured the very best hotels and drivers available, making it not only a very successful but also comfortable trip too.
    [Show full text]
  • Ambatovy Case Study
    Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme (BBOP) BBOP Pilot Project Case Study The Ambatovy Project Forest Trends, Conservation International and the Wildlife Conservation Society provided the Secretariat for BBOP during the first phase of the programme's work (2004 – 2008). Publication Data The Ambatovy Project Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme Pilot Project Case Study, 2009: The Ambatovy Project is a Joint Venture project between Sherritt Incorporated, Sumitomo Incorporated, Kores and SNC Lavalin. The Ambatovy Project is comprised of the following two Madagascan operating companies, Ambatovy Minerals SA (AMSA) and Dynatec Madagascar S.A. (DMSA). The Project Administrative offices are located at Trano Fitaratra, 7ème étage, Ankorondrano, Antananarivo, Madagascar (PO Box 12085, Poste Zoom, Ankorondrano), T: +261 20 22 230 88 / 22 397 35 – 37 F: +261 20 22 540 30, http://www.sherritt.mg/ Available from www.forest-trends.org/biodiversityoffsetprogram/guidelines/ambatovy-case-study.pdf. © The Ambatovy Project (Ambatovy Minerals SA/Dynatec Madagascar SA) 2009. Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorised without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission of the copyright holder. The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed here are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of The
    [Show full text]
  • Comparing Species Tree Estimation with Large
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research College of Staten Island 2015 Comparing species tree estimation with large anchored phylogenomic and small Sanger-sequenced molecular datasets: an empirical study on Malagasy pseudoxyrhophiine snakes Sara Ruane American Museum of Natural History, Central Park West at 79th Street, New York, NY 10024 USA Christopher J. Raxworthy American Museum of Natural History Alan R. Lemmon Florida State University Emily Moriarty Lemmon Florida State University Frank T. Burbrink CUNY College of Staten Island How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/si_pubs/58 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Ruane et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology (2015) 15:221 DOI 10.1186/s12862-015-0503-1 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Comparing species tree estimation with large anchored phylogenomic and small Sanger-sequenced molecular datasets: an empirical study on Malagasy pseudoxyrhophiine snakes Sara Ruane1*, Christopher J. Raxworthy1, Alan R. Lemmon2, Emily Moriarty Lemmon2 and Frank T. Burbrink1,3 Abstract Background: Using molecular data generated by high throughput next generation sequencing (NGS) platforms to infer phylogeny is becoming common as costs go down and the ability to capture loci from across the genome goes up. While there is a general consensus that greater numbers of independent loci should result in more robust phylogenetic estimates, few studies have compared phylogenies resulting from smaller datasets for commonly used genetic markers with the large datasets captured using NGS.
    [Show full text]