DOCSLIB.ORG

DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT PANEL 17 AUGUST 2015 Case No: 15/00875/FUL (FULL

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT PANEL 17 AUGUST 2015 Case No: 15/00875/FUL (FULL DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT PANEL 17 AUGUST 2015 Case No: 15/00875/FUL (FULL PLANNING APPLICATION) Proposal: CHANGE OF LAND USE AND CONSTRUCTION OF A HARD SURFACED TENNIS COURT WITH SURROUND FENCING. Location: DIDDINGTON MANOR THE STREET DIDDINGTON ST NEOTS Applicant: MR EDMUND THORNHILL Grid Ref: 519482 265603 Date of Registration: 30.05.2015 Parish: DIDDINGTON RECOMMENDATION - REFUSE This application is referred to Panel as the Parish Council recommendation to approve is contrary to the officer recommendation to refuse. 1. DESCRIPTION OF SITE AND APPLICATION 1.1 The application site lies in the countryside east of the A1 in Diddington Conservation Area. The site is part of a field which lies north-west of a range of stables and north of a hedge around a large graveled parking area. South-east of the stables lie two substantial old barns, a modern outbuilding and Manor farmhouse. The barn nearer the back of the house is Grade II listed and the other is an old unlisted threshing barn. 1.2 The proposal is to change the use of part of a rural field to create a private hard surfaced tennis court (17m x 35m) and to erect black post and chain link fencing around the court ranging from 0.9m to 2.75m in height. New indigenous hedging would be introduced on three sides of the court. The court would be finished with a grass colour. 1.3 There are views of the site from the road, including from the south west, opposite 21 The Street and through a gap in the hedge from the access south-east of the site. 1.4 A design and access statement and Great Crested Newts survey by Chris Vine of April/May 2015 have been submitted with the application. The applicant has also submitted, during the processing of the application, an Heritage appraisal and an archaeological appraisal statement relating to the earthwork area at Manor Farm, as the Farm is surrounded by Historic Environment Record evidence that attests to the presence of house platforms, enclosures and trackways indicative of shrunken Medieval village remains and which are possible components of Grimbaud’s Manor, the earliest records of which stem from the 11th century AD. 2. NATIONAL GUIDANCE 2.1 The National Planning Policy Framework (2012) sets out the three dimensions to sustainable development - an economic role, a social role and an environmental role - and outlines the presumption in favour of sustainable development. Paragraph 7 Achieving sustainable development Core planning principles, paragraph 17 including bullet point 10 regarding conserving heritage assets. Section 8 Promoting healthy communities, paragraph 73. Paragraph 118 regarding protected species. Section 12 Conserving and enhancing the historic environment including Paragraphs 131 and 134. 2.2 BS42020:2013 Biodiversity-Code of practice for planning and development. 2.3 Natural England’s “Standing Advice” on protected species including great crested newts and bats. For full details visit the government website: https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/department-for-communities- and-local-government 3. PLANNING POLICIES 3.1 Saved policies from the Huntingdonshire Local Plan (1995) En2: “Character and setting of Listed Buildings” En5: “Conservation Area Character” En6: “Design standards in Conservation Areas” En9: “Open spaces, trees and street scenes in Conservation Areas” En12: “Archaeological Implications” En17: “Development in the Countryside” En18: “Protection of countryside features” En22: “Conservation” En23: “Conservation” En25: “General Design Criteria” 3.2 Saved policies from the Huntingdonshire Local Plan Alterations (2002)- none relevant. 3.3 Adopted Huntingdonshire Local Development Framework Core Strategy (2009) CS1: “Sustainable development in Huntingdonshire” 3.4 Draft Huntingdonshire Local Plan to 2036: Stage 3 (2013) Policy LP 1: “Strategy and principles for development” Policy LP 11: “The Relationship Between the Built-up Area and the Countryside - The countryside includes all land outside built-up areas and those hamlets, groups of buildings and individual buildings that are clearly detached from the continuous built-up area of a defined settlement that are not themselves defined settlements. Policy LP 13: “Quality of Design” Policy LP 15: “Ensuring a High Standard of Amenity” Policy LP 21: “Rural Economy” Policy LP 28: “Biodiversity and Protected Habitats and Species” Policy LP 31: “Heritage Assets and their Settings” 3.5 Supplementary Planning Documents: Huntingdonshire Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document 2007 Huntingdonshire Landscape and Townscape Supplementary Planning Document 2007 Local policies are viewable at https://www.huntingdonshire.gov.uk 4. PLANNING HISTORY Adjoining buildings: 4.1 9001560LBC Demolish front wing and alter part of Barn -consent 1990. 4.2 1000696FUL Change of use from stable block to ancillary residential accommodation (garden room) south of listed barn- approved 2010. 4.3 1200884FUL Change of use from agricultural barn to hospitality suite for farm shoot, demolition of existing 'modern' stables with associated landscaping and parking layout approved 2012. 4.4 1200885LBC Change of use from agricultural barn to hospitality suite for farm shoot, demolition of existing 'modern' stables with associated landscaping and parking layout approved 2012. 4.5 1201246ful convert barn south-west of listed barn to pool and cart shed west of listed and unlisted barns to associated storage- approved. 4.6 1401372FUL and 1401373LBC alterations and change of use of a grade II listed barn to form swimming pool approved 2015. 4.7 1401376FUL Demolition of barn south-west of listed barn- withdrawn. 5. CONSULTATIONS 5.1 DIDDINGTON Parish via BUCKDEN Parish Council- Recommend approve (COPY ATTACHED) 5.2 Cambridgeshire County Council Archaeology – Recommend approve subject to a condition to secure a small works scheme sufficient to allow for the monitoring and recording of this land plot during construction. 6. REPRESENTATIONS 6.1 None received. 7. SUMMARY OF ISSUES 7.1 The main issues for consideration are: the principle of the change of use in the countryside, the impact on the character and appearance of the countryside and conservation area, setting of the listed building, archaeology, protected species. Principle: 7.2 The site lies in open countryside outside the residential curtilage of the dwelling. Policy En17 of the 1995 Local Plan states that development outside the built-up framework will generally be restricted to that which is essential for the efficient operation of local agriculture, horticulture, forestry, permitted mineral extraction, outdoor recreation or public utility services. 7.3 Policy LP11 states that all land outside the built up area is defined as countryside. 7.4 LP21 states that proposals for outdoor leisure or recreation in the countryside will be supported where a countryside location is justified. 7.5 LP22 states that a proposal for leisure development in the countryside will be supported where it is in a location that is well- related to an existing settlement or where there are demonstrable locational or sustainability reasons why it has to be located elsewhere. 7.6 The applicant advises that the site was selected over 50m from the nearest part of the house and 5m from the stables because the site was relatively level and screened by a hedge to the south and barn to the east. The applicant considers that a site closer to the house would ‘potentially have a more significant impact on the setting of the house and the outbuildings’ and involve the loss of lawn, trees and shrubs. 7.7 The applicant’s points have been taken into account but given limited weight as their assertion is unsupported by evidence. The proposal is considered to be unacceptable in principle as although the NPPF is generally supportive of outdoor recreation), the proposal is not ‘essential development’ in the countryside and the loss of part of the field to the tennis court and fence fails to satisfy policy En17 of HLP 1995 and policy LP21 of The Huntingdonshire Draft Local Plan to 2036. 7.8 The application follows preliminary enquiry reference 1407178PENQ for a similar proposal for a tennis court where the applicant was advised on 9th July 2014: ‘There is no justification for a tennis court in the open countryside and therefore this element of your scheme would not gain officer support’. 7.9 The advantages of securing a private leisure facility are outweighed by the harm caused with the loss of part of the countryside. The proposal is considered to be contrary to policy En17 of the Huntingdonshire Local Plan (1995) and policy LP21 of The Huntingdonshire Draft Local Plan to 2036. Character and appearance of the countryside/ conservation area 7.10 The site is currently mown grass in a larger field, part of which was, at the time of the officer site visit, otherwise unmown. The proposal would replace the surface with hard landscaping and introduce a fence and introduce activity into the site. The colour of the court and fence could be controlled by condition. 7.11 The site is part screened by soft landscaping and the stables and the applicant proposes additional soft landscaping which would help to soften the impact when the landscaping matures, although the proposal is to maintain the hedge at approximately 2m in height, which means that the top of the higher part of the fence would be exposed to view from the road. Furthermore, when the existing hedges are not in leaf, the tennis court will be more exposed in this rural setting. 7.12 The main view of the site is from the south west, opposite 21 The Street, due to a gap in the hedges for an access. However, even if a further hedge along part of the roadside was secured, it would not overcome the concern about the harm to the character and appearance of the area caused by the visual intrusion of the court and fence into the field. The proposal would also obscure a view of the pleasingly and traditionally designed stables to the side.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Research Framework Revised.Vp
    Frontispiece: the Norfolk Rapid Coastal Zone Assessment Survey team recording timbers and ballast from the wreck of The Sheraton on Hunstanton beach, with Hunstanton cliffs and lighthouse in the background. Photo: David Robertson, copyright NAU Archaeology Research and Archaeology Revisited: a revised framework for the East of England edited by Maria Medlycott East Anglian Archaeology Occasional Paper No.24, 2011 ALGAO East of England EAST ANGLIAN ARCHAEOLOGY OCCASIONAL PAPER NO.24 Published by Association of Local Government Archaeological Officers East of England http://www.algao.org.uk/cttees/Regions Editor: David Gurney EAA Managing Editor: Jenny Glazebrook Editorial Board: Brian Ayers, Director, The Butrint Foundation Owen Bedwin, Head of Historic Environment, Essex County Council Stewart Bryant, Head of Historic Environment, Hertfordshire County Council Will Fletcher, English Heritage Kasia Gdaniec, Historic Environment, Cambridgeshire County Council David Gurney, Historic Environment Manager, Norfolk County Council Debbie Priddy, English Heritage Adrian Tindall, Archaeological Consultant Keith Wade, Archaeological Service Manager, Suffolk County Council Set in Times Roman by Jenny Glazebrook using Corel Ventura™ Printed by Henry Ling Limited, The Dorset Press © ALGAO East of England ISBN 978 0 9510695 6 1 This Research Framework was published with the aid of funding from English Heritage East Anglian Archaeology was established in 1975 by the Scole Committee for Archaeology in East Anglia. The scope of the series expanded to include all six eastern counties and responsi- bility for publication passed in 2002 to the Association of Local Government Archaeological Officers, East of England (ALGAO East). Cover illustration: The excavation of prehistoric burial monuments at Hanson’s Needingworth Quarry at Over, Cambridgeshire, by Cambridge Archaeological Unit in 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridgeshire Tydd St
    C D To Long Sutton To Sutton Bridge 55 Cambridgeshire Tydd St. Mary 24 24 50 50 Foul Anchor 55 Tydd Passenger Transport Map 2011 Tydd St. Giles Gote 24 50 Newton 1 55 1 24 50 To Kings Lynn Fitton End 55 To Kings Lynn 46 Gorefield 24 010 LINCOLNSHIRE 63 308.X1 24 WHF To Holbeach Drove 390 24 390 Leverington WHF See separate map WHF WHF for service detail in this area Throckenholt 24 Wisbech Parson 24 390.WHF Drove 24 46 WHF 24 390 Bellamys Bridge 24 46 Wisbech 3 64 To Terrington 390 24. St. Mary A B Elm Emneth E 390 Murrow 3 24 308 010 60 X1 56 64 7 Friday Bridge 65 Thorney 46 380 308 X1 To Grantham X1 NORFOLK and the North 390 308 Outwell 308 Thorney X1 7 Toll Guyhirn Coldham Upwell For details of bus services To in this area see Peterborough City Council Ring’s End 60 Stamford and 7 publicity or call: 01733 747474 60 2 46 3 64 Leicester Eye www.travelchoice.org 010 2 X1 65 390 56 60.64 3.15.24.31.33.46 To 308 7 380 Three Holes Stamford 203.205.206.390.405 33 46 407.415.701.X1.X4 Chainbridge To Downham Market 33 65 65 181 X4 Peterborough 206 701 24 Lot’s Bridge Wansford 308 350 Coates See separate map Iron Bridge To Leicester for service detail Whittlesey 33 701 in this area X4 Eastrea March Christchurch 65 181 206 701 33 24 15 31 46 Tips End 203 65 F Chesterton Hampton 205 Farcet X4 350 9 405 3 31 35 010 Welney 115 To Elton 24 206 X4 407 56 Kings Lynn 430 415 7 56 Gold Hill Haddon 203.205 X8 X4 350.405 Black Horse 24.181 407.430 Yaxley 3.7.430 Wimblington Boots Drove To Oundle 430 Pondersbridge 206.X4 Morborne Bridge 129 430 56 Doddington Hundred Foot Bank 15 115 203 56 46.
    [Show full text]
  • Tree-Strategy-Introduction.Pdf
    February 2015 A Tree Strategy for Huntingdonshire Introduction 2 Introduction A TREE STRATEGY FOR HUNTINGDONSHIRE Introduction Foreword by Councillor Douglas Dew Executive Councillor for Strategic Planning & Housing: Huntingdonshire has a varied historic landscape of 350 square miles, with 4 market towns and nearly 100 villages, all within an expanse of attractive, open countryside, farmland, and woodland. Trees play an important role in the rural and urban landscapes of Huntingdonshire, improving the quality of life in many ways. They make a great contribution to our rural and urban areas, adding great beauty and character and creating a sense of place. They enhance and complement the built environment by providing screening, focal points, privacy and perspective. Those in parks and gardens bring nature into the hearts of our towns. Streets planted with trees look better, and they also provide valuable wildlife corridors, connecting open spaces. Trees are the largest and oldest living things in the environment. Trees and woodlands are dominant landscape features, and collectively they form one of Huntingdonshire’s finest features. We need to protect our trees and care for them properly. We also need to make sure we plant new trees to replace those that we have to remove, or which have reached the end of their normal lives, so that future generations can derive the same enjoyment and benefits from trees that we do. This strategy sets out how the Council will do this over the coming years. We aim to have more and better trees than we have at the moment, in an attractive environment which will help make Huntingdonshire a better place in which to live, work, study and spend leisure time.
    [Show full text]
  • Messy Church Launched at Wereham
    ISSUE 49 Spring 2014 Messy Church launched at Wereham Messy Church has been launched at Wereham parish. This is the first time it has taken place in this rural group of In this issue parishes. Some 25 children of all ages attended the after school event Messy Church taking part in arts and crafts, storytelling, worship and drama – all followed up by a sausage and mash supper. The Archdeacon of Cambridge retires The new project has been enabled with a grant of £960 from the diocesan Local Mission Projects Fund. Ashing at Brington Parish priest, the Revd Barbara Burton, said: “We are School delighted that so many children of all ages and some of their parents attended this first session. It’s been a continuation of work with families in our local community Ashes to go following a revamping of our Christmas carol services to Connecting Seminar involve more children who do not normally attend church. That was successful with attendance Clergy Stewardship numbers rising from about 10 in Day the previous year to 209 at last year’s carol service. Obituary of the “Being enabled to set up Messy Venerable James Rone Church helps us to continue to support families in our Plough Sunday community, and I much look forward to seeing how this benefits us all.” Ely’s Director of Mission, the Revd Peter Wood, said: “Wereham parish church has Appointment of seen an increasing number of baptisms and were keen to continue to develop their Rachel Beeson work with families. At the same time, the Village Hall Committee had begun to recognise that school aged children were not being sufficiently provided for.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridgeshire Estimated CO2 Emissions 2017 V2 Per Capita
    Cambridgeshire Estimated CO2 emissions 2017 v2 Per capita Est 2016 Industry, Commercial Indirect Indirect Local authority name Village/Town/Ward Population Total agriculture and agriculture emissions Transport not industry (t) industry not Domestic Grand Cambridge Abbey 9,990 21.1 13.3 8.6 39.9 82.8 Arbury 9,146 19.3 12.2 7.9 36.5 75.8 Castle 9,867 20.8 13.1 8.5 39.4 81.8 Cherry Hinton 8,853 18.7 11.8 7.6 35.3 73.4 Coleridge 9,464 20.0 12.6 8.2 37.8 78.5 East Chesterton 9,483 20.0 12.6 8.2 37.8 78.6 King's Hedges 9,218 19.5 12.3 7.9 36.8 76.4 Market 7,210 15.2 9.6 6.2 28.8 59.8 Newnham 7,933 16.7 10.6 6.8 31.6 65.8 Petersfield 8,402 17.7 11.2 7.2 33.5 69.7 Queen Edith's 9,203 19.4 12.2 7.9 36.7 76.3 Romsey 9,329 19.7 12.4 8.0 37.2 77.4 Trumpington 8,101 17.1 10.8 7.0 32.3 67.2 West Chesterton 8,701 18.4 11.6 7.5 34.7 72.2 Cambridge Total 124,900 263.6 166.2 107.7 498.3 1,035.8 6.2 East Cambridgeshire Ashley 794 2.3 1.2 2.6 3.3 9.3 Bottisham 2,332 6.7 3.5 7.5 9.7 27.4 Brinkley 415 1.2 0.6 1.3 1.7 4.9 Burrough Green 402 1.2 0.6 1.3 1.7 4.7 Burwell 6,692 19.2 9.9 21.6 27.8 78.5 Cheveley 2,111 6.1 3.1 6.8 8.8 24.8 Chippenham 548 1.6 0.8 1.8 2.3 6.4 Coveney 450 1.3 0.7 1.4 1.9 5.3 Downham 2,746 7.9 4.1 8.8 11.4 32.2 Dullingham 814 2.3 1.2 2.6 3.4 9.5 Ely 21,484 61.8 31.9 69.2 89.2 252.2 Fordham 2,876 8.3 4.3 9.3 11.9 33.8 Haddenham 3,547 10.2 5.3 11.4 14.7 41.6 Isleham 2,522 7.3 3.7 8.1 10.5 29.6 Kennett 374 1.1 0.6 1.2 1.6 4.4 Kirtling 347 1.0 0.5 1.1 1.4 4.1 Littleport 9,268 26.6 13.8 29.9 38.5 108.8 Lode 968 2.8 1.4 3.1 4.0 11.4 Mepal 1,042
    [Show full text]
  • Diocese of Ely Directory
    Diocese of Ely Directory Published: 12 February 2021 For comments, corrections or suggestions please email Jackie Williamson on [email protected] Introduction This directory has been ordered alphabetically by Archdeaconry > Deanery > Benefice - and then Church/Parish. For each Church/Parish, the names and contact details (email and telephone) have been included for the Licensed Clergy and Churchwardens. Where known a website and “A Church Near You” link have also been included. Towards the back of the directory, details have also been included that include, where known, the following contact details: • Rural Deans (name, number and email) • Clergy (name, number and email) • Clergy with Permission to Officiate (name, number and email) • General Synod Members from the Diocese of Ely - (name only) • Bishops Council (name only) • Diocesan Synod Members (Ely) (name only) • Assistant Bishops (name only) • Surrogates (name only) • Bishop’s and Archdeacons Office, Ely Diocesan Board of Finance staff, Cathedral Staff How to update or amend details If your details are inaccurate, or you would prefer a change to what is included, please direct your query as follows: • Licensed Clergy: Please contact the Bishop’s Office (https://www.elydiocese.org/about/contact-us/) • Clergy with PTO: Please contact the Bishop’s Office (https://www.elydiocese.org/about/contact-us/) • Churchwardens: Please contact the Archdeacon’s Office (https://www.elydiocese.org/about/contact-us/) • PCC Roles: [email protected] • Deanery/Benefice/Parish/Church names: DAC Office on [email protected] Data Protection The Ely Diocesan Board of Finance considers there to be a legitimate justification for publishing the contact details for Licensed Clergy (including those with PTO), Churchwardens and Diocesan staff (including those in the Archdeacons’ and Bishops’ offices) and key staff in Ely Cathedral in this Directory and on occasion the Diocesan website.
    [Show full text]
  • PJD's Election Address, V2
    Cambridgeshire County Council Election Thursday, May 4th 2017 Peter Downes to stand for the Liberal Democrats in Cambridgeshire Council election I am pleased to have been asked to stand to represent Buckden and Diddington, along with Brampton, Southoe and The Offords, in the new Cambridgeshire County Council from May 2017. I have been a County Councillor for the last 16 years and I have learnt a great deal about how local democracy works, what it can (and cannot!) achieve. On side 2 you will find a summary of the main policy priorities of the Liberal Democrats in Cambridgeshire and a short cv. In this letter, I want to spell out how I see the role of the County Councillor and what I would seek to do if elected. I would aim to keep you fully informed about the key issues facing the County Council as a provider of essential services, for example, care for the elderly, support for vulnerable young *people, highways maintenance and road safety. I would do this through regular Focus newsletters as I have done in Brampton since I first became a councillor They have just received edition no. 126 ! I would make myself as available as possible, in person and by telephone and e-mail, so that you *can raise with me any specific concerns you may have about council services. I do not promise to be able to solve everybody’s problems but I can usually provide guidance and a steer in the right direction, working constructively with council officers. I would work closely with the parish council, helping them to liaise with the County Council, representing local concerns and opinions on proposals coming forward.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lands of the Scottish Kings in England
    THE LANDS OF THE SCOTTISH KINGS IN ENGLAND THE HONOUR OF HUNTINGDON THE LIBERTY OF TYNDALE AND THE HONOUR OF PENRITH BY MARGARET F. MOORE, M.A. (EDINBURGH) (CARNLGIKFELLOW IN PALEOGRAPHY AND EARLY ECONOMIC RIITORY) INTRODUCTION BY P. HUME BROWN, M.A., LL.D., Fraser Profcsaor of Ancient (Scottish) History and Palieography in the University of Edinburgh, and Historiographer- Royal for Scotland LONDON : GEORGE ALLEN & UNWIN LTD- RUSKIN HOUSE, MUSEUM STREET, W.C* CONTENTS PREFACE - - - - - --- - - vii CHAPTERI PAGE THE HISTORY OF THE HONOURS AND LIBERTY - - I CHAPTERI1 THE MEDIRVAL ASPECT OF THE LANDS - - - - 13 CHAPTERI11 THE FEUDAL HISTORY OF THE HOLDINGS - - - 29 CHAPTERIV THE MANORIAL FRANCHISES - - - - - - 48 CHAPTERV THE MANORIAL ECONOMY - ----- 67 CHAPTER VI LOCAL CHURCH HISTORY -..-- - 94 CHAPTERVII STATE OF SOCIETY ---- - 109 MANORIAL ECONOMY OF THE MANOR OF MARKET OVERTON IN THE FOURTEENTH CENTURY --- - 130 PREFACE THIs was completed during the tenure of a Carnegie Research Fellowship and has been published by aid of a grant from the Carnegie Trust. The subject of research, connected as it is with Scottish history, is one which appeals naturally to a Scottish student of English manorial history; for although it is well known that the Scottish kings held certain lands in England during the twelfth and thirteenth centuries little attention has been given to the details of these holdings. The personal association of David I and his heirs and of the ill-fated John Balliol with the Honour of Huntingdon, the Liberty of Tyndale and the Honour of Penrith is usually regarded as an incident of feudal tenure, and the sojourn of the Scottish kings on English soil has left no records other than the allowances and establish- ments of the royal household.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2014
    ROUNDAB UT FEBRUARY 2014 Frozen gravel pit near Diddington Brook - December 2009 Not something we have seen so far this year - but winter is only just beginning! ...serving Buckden, Diddington and Stirtloe REGULAR EVENTS Monday to Buckden Pre-school Playgroup for 2 to 4 year olds in TERM TIME from 9.00 am to Friday 3.00 pm (including lunch club) on Mondays to Thursdays and 9.00 am to 12 noon on Fridays. Contact: Sarah Brown, Supervisor during pre-school hours on: 07941 671 999 Monday Buckden Whist Club at The Towers—7.15pm. New members welcome. 1st Southoe & Buckden Scout Group Beavers (for younger boys and girls) from 6.00 pm to 7.15 pm. The Aragon Singers meet in the Methodist Hall at 7.30 pm. Membership enquiries to Pam Dodman on 812880. Bellringers from 8.00 pm to 9.00 pm in the tower of St Mary’s Church. New members welcome, contact Philip Miles 810027 for information. Tuesday Storytime sessions are free and held weekly during term time at Buckden Library from 2.15 to 2.45 pm for all pre-school children with their carers. Grafham and Ellington Art Group - 1.30 to 4.00pm, weekly at Grafham Village Hall, Van Diemans Way, Grafham, PE28 0BG. Contact for further details: Jackie Woods, on 01480 890279. 1st Buckden Rainbows meet in the Buckden Scout Hut from 4.30 pm - 5.30 pm. Contact Sandra on 810404 for details Buckden Parish Council meets at 7.30 pm in Buckden Village Hall on the second Tuesday of the month except August.
    [Show full text]
  • Parish and Town Council Submissions to the Cambridgeshire County Council Electoral Review
    Parish and Town Council submissions to the Cambridgeshire County Council electoral review This PDF document contains submissions from Parish and Town Councils. Some versions of Adobe allow the viewer to move quickly between bookmarks. Click on the submission you would like to view. If you are not taken to that page, please scroll through the document. Hinds, Alex From: Fuller, Heather Sent: 08 January 2015 11:46 To: Hinds, Alex Subject: FW: ELECTORAL REVIEW OF CAMBRIDGESHIRE Barton PC From: Patrick De Backer [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 08 January 2015 11:04 To: Reviews@ Subject: ELECTORAL REVIEW OF CAMBRIDGESHIRE Barton PC BARTON PARISH COUNCIL Margaret Penston Chair Patrick De Backer Parish Clerk [email protected] ELECTORAL REVIEW OF CAMBRIDGESHIRE The Parish Council has debated the proposed changes. It prefers to keep the status quo for the Hardwick division - at the moment that division serves its constituents well and particularly forms an integral part and serves the needs of the Quarter to Six Quadrant villages and the cooperative work that has gone on among them. Kind regards Patrick De Backer 1 Hinds, Alex From: Egan, Helen Sent: 13 January 2015 16:43 To: Hinds, Alex Subject: FW: Electoral Review of Cambridgeshire Hi Alex, Please see submission below for Cambridgeshire. Helen From: Buckden Parish Clerk [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 13 January 2015 15:04 To: Reviews@ Subject: Electoral Review of Cambridgeshire The Parish Council has considered what it would like to see in the review and that can be simply summed up as: Buckden, Diddington and Southoe should be within the same division.
    [Show full text]
  • 66 Bus Time Schedule & Line Route
    66 bus time schedule & line map 66 Huntingdon - Eaton Socon View In Website Mode The 66 bus line (Huntingdon - Eaton Socon) has 4 routes. For regular weekdays, their operation hours are: (1) Brampton: 7:20 PM (2) Eaton Ford: 5:30 PM (3) Huntingdon: 6:35 AM - 5:20 PM (4) St Neots: 7:20 AM - 4:20 PM Use the Moovit App to ƒnd the closest 66 bus station near you and ƒnd out when is the next 66 bus arriving. Direction: Brampton 66 bus Time Schedule 17 stops Brampton Route Timetable: VIEW LINE SCHEDULE Sunday Not Operational Monday 7:20 PM Bus Station, Huntingdon Princes Street, Huntingdon Tuesday 7:20 PM Millƒeld Park, Huntingdon Wednesday 7:20 PM 3 Brampton Road, Huntingdon Thursday 7:20 PM Railway Station, Huntingdon Friday 7:20 PM Playing Field, Hinchingbrooke Park Saturday Not Operational Scholars Avenue, Huntingdon Snowdonia Way, Hinchingbrooke Park Hinchingbrooke Hospital, Hinchingbrooke Park 66 bus Info Direction: Brampton Snowdonia Way, Hinchingbrooke Park Stops: 17 Trip Duration: 23 min Bromholme Lane, Brampton Line Summary: Bus Station, Huntingdon, Millƒeld Park, Huntingdon, Railway Station, Huntingdon, Church Road, Brampton Playing Field, Hinchingbrooke Park, Snowdonia Way, Hinchingbrooke Park, Hinchingbrooke Hospital, Orchard Lane, Brampton Hinchingbrooke Park, Snowdonia Way, Hinchingbrooke Park, Bromholme Lane, Brampton, Church Road, Brampton, Orchard Lane, Brampton, Evans Close, Brampton Evans Close, Brampton, Crane Street, Brampton, Spinney Close, Brampton Civil Parish Burnaby Close, Brampton, Bernard Road, Brampton, Crane Street,
    [Show full text]
  • A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet Improvements TR010044
    A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet improvements TR010044 Volume 7 7.10 Combined Modelling and Appraisal Report Appendix A: Traffic Data Collection Report Planning Act 2008 Regulation 5(2)(q) Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 26 February 2021 Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010044 Application Document Ref: TR010044/APP/7.10 A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet improvements Appendix A: Traffic Data Collection Report Infrastructure Planning Planning Act 2008 The Infrastructure Planning (Applications: Prescribed Forms and Procedure) Regulations 2009 A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet improvements Development Consent Order 202[ ] Appendix A: Traffic Data Collection Report Regulation Reference: Regulation 5(2)(q) Planning Inspectorate Scheme TR010044 Reference Application Document Reference TR010044/APP/7.10) Author A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet improvements Project Team, Highways England Version Date Status of Version Rev 1 26 February 2021 DCO Application Planning Inspectorate Scheme Ref: TR010044 Application Document Ref: TR010044/APP/7.10 A428 Black Cat to Caxton Gibbet improvements Appendix A: Traffic Data Collection Report Contents 1 Introduction........................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose of Report ................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Scheme Description ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]